Showing posts with label Townhall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Townhall. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Brent Bozell's Townhall.com Column
Brent Bozell is one of the best lecturers, syndicated columnisst, television commentators, debaters, as well as marketers. Mr. Bozell is also a real businessman, author, publisher and activist. L. Brent Bozell III, 54, is one of the most outspoken and effective national leaders in the conservative movement today.
Brent Bozell is the Founder and President of the Media Research Center which has helped America as the Marxists and Communists try and destroy us. Mr. Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America. Established in 1987, the MRC has made “media bias” a household term, tracking it daily and printing the compiled evidence biweekly in its well-known Notable Quotables, as well as the daily CyberAlert intelligence report on the internet.
Brent Bozell has a recent book, Whitewash: What the Media Won’t Tell You About Hillary Clinton, but Conservatives Will, was released in November of 2007. His previous book, Weapons of Mass Distortion: The Coming Meltdown of the Liberal Media, was released in July of 2004.
Founder and former President of the Parents Television Council, Mr. Bozell established the largest Hollywood-based organization dedicated to restoring responsibility to the entertainment industry.
Mr. Bozell is a nationally syndicated columnist whose work appears in publications such as Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, The New York Post, The L.A. Times, National Review and one of favorites, the Investors Business Daily. He is regularly invited to provide media expertise on news programs by all the major networks and cable affiliates.
Labels:
Brent-Bozell,
Media-Research-Center,
msm-bigots,
msm-cowards,
MSM-Frauds,
No-tyrants,
racist-msm,
Townhall,
Townhall.com
Monday, February 25, 2013
Tax Breaks for The Hollywood Hypocrites
The director Steven Spielberg is not a Patriot. He will take your American dollars yet he openly supported the Regime at Election time. Vile Steven Spielberg could have put the movie “Lincoln” out prior to the election to show how Obama is the complete opposite of Abraham Lincoln. Instead Vile Steven Spielberg help the movie back and too the tax breaks from the Regime.
We also read where Glenn Harlan Reynolds exposed Hollywood hypocrisy over taxes in The Wall Street Journal, chronicling how many recent Oscar-nominated films benefited from tax breaks and how much Lincoln received en route to Oscar night.
All the while, these disgusting celebrity stars plead with government officials to raise taxes on the wealthy.
Of the nine "Best Picture" nominees in 2012, for example, five were filmed on location in states where the production company received financial incentives, including "The Help" (in Mississippi) and "Moneyball" (in California). Virginia gave $3.5 million to this year's Oscar-nominated "Lincoln."
Concerned citizens can see this informative article below from Kevin Glass at Townhall.com
If Hollywood Liberals Want Tax Hikes, They Should Look In the Mirror
If you're settling in to watch the Oscars tonight and want to genuinely enjoy the experience, best not to think of the fact that those Hollywood celebrities do their best to suck the government of all the tax subsidies they can get while simultaneously advocating that taxes be raised - just, you know, not on the movie industry.
Peter Schweizer over at Forbes writes:
Consider a few of this year’s Oscar nominated films. According to a new report by the Government Accountability Institute, Quentin Tarantino’s controversial spaghetti Western, Django Unchained, featuring Jamie Foxx and Leonardo DiCaprio has applied to receive an estimated $8.4 million in film tax credits from the State of Louisiana. Actor-director Ben Affleck and producer George Clooney’s film, Argo, received $6.21 million in tax credits from the California Film Commission. Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, featuring Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, and Tommy Lee Jones, hauled in $3.5 million in tax-free film credits. Silver Linings Playbook bagged a cool $5.6 million.
Indeed, 40 states now have some form of subsidy or incentive that allow filmmakers to defray income and/or sales taxes incurred during filming. Thirteen states even offer so-called “transferrable film tax credits” that allow filmmakers to convert unused credits into cash—at taxpayer expense, of course.
Hollywood celebrities generally skew liberal, of course, and there's no shortage of them on the record as wanting to pay higher taxes. Ben Affleck, the star and director of Argo, one of the most-decorated films of the year, has repeatedly said things like "I don't spend so much that I can't afford to pay a little bit more in taxes."
If these Hollywood stars were serious about paying more in taxes, they'd attack the tax "incentives" for moviemaking. It'd be much more efficient, and they might even get a few conservatives on board!
Unfortunately, the Motion Picture Association of America has one of the most effective lobbyists in the country: Chris Dodd, former Democrat senator from Connecticut. And Dodd's not about to let those juicy tax credits slip through Hollywood's fingers. Dodd claimed that the fight for tax credits is about small businesses and "dry cleaners, restaurants, and florists."
“Not only does film and television production in New York employ the thousands of men and women working on some of the most popular television shows and films, it also supports small businesses in every sector of the economy – dry cleaners, restaurants, florists – who benefit when a production comes to town.”
So while Hollywood enjoys one of its most popular nights and pats itself on the back by giving awards to itself, remember: they're happy to remain blissfully ignorant about how their industry sucks tax revenues out of government coffers.
We also read where Glenn Harlan Reynolds exposed Hollywood hypocrisy over taxes in The Wall Street Journal, chronicling how many recent Oscar-nominated films benefited from tax breaks and how much Lincoln received en route to Oscar night.
All the while, these disgusting celebrity stars plead with government officials to raise taxes on the wealthy.
Of the nine "Best Picture" nominees in 2012, for example, five were filmed on location in states where the production company received financial incentives, including "The Help" (in Mississippi) and "Moneyball" (in California). Virginia gave $3.5 million to this year's Oscar-nominated "Lincoln."
Concerned citizens can see this informative article below from Kevin Glass at Townhall.com
If Hollywood Liberals Want Tax Hikes, They Should Look In the Mirror
If you're settling in to watch the Oscars tonight and want to genuinely enjoy the experience, best not to think of the fact that those Hollywood celebrities do their best to suck the government of all the tax subsidies they can get while simultaneously advocating that taxes be raised - just, you know, not on the movie industry.
Peter Schweizer over at Forbes writes:
Consider a few of this year’s Oscar nominated films. According to a new report by the Government Accountability Institute, Quentin Tarantino’s controversial spaghetti Western, Django Unchained, featuring Jamie Foxx and Leonardo DiCaprio has applied to receive an estimated $8.4 million in film tax credits from the State of Louisiana. Actor-director Ben Affleck and producer George Clooney’s film, Argo, received $6.21 million in tax credits from the California Film Commission. Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, featuring Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, and Tommy Lee Jones, hauled in $3.5 million in tax-free film credits. Silver Linings Playbook bagged a cool $5.6 million.
Indeed, 40 states now have some form of subsidy or incentive that allow filmmakers to defray income and/or sales taxes incurred during filming. Thirteen states even offer so-called “transferrable film tax credits” that allow filmmakers to convert unused credits into cash—at taxpayer expense, of course.
Hollywood celebrities generally skew liberal, of course, and there's no shortage of them on the record as wanting to pay higher taxes. Ben Affleck, the star and director of Argo, one of the most-decorated films of the year, has repeatedly said things like "I don't spend so much that I can't afford to pay a little bit more in taxes."
If these Hollywood stars were serious about paying more in taxes, they'd attack the tax "incentives" for moviemaking. It'd be much more efficient, and they might even get a few conservatives on board!
Unfortunately, the Motion Picture Association of America has one of the most effective lobbyists in the country: Chris Dodd, former Democrat senator from Connecticut. And Dodd's not about to let those juicy tax credits slip through Hollywood's fingers. Dodd claimed that the fight for tax credits is about small businesses and "dry cleaners, restaurants, and florists."
“Not only does film and television production in New York employ the thousands of men and women working on some of the most popular television shows and films, it also supports small businesses in every sector of the economy – dry cleaners, restaurants, florists – who benefit when a production comes to town.”
So while Hollywood enjoys one of its most popular nights and pats itself on the back by giving awards to itself, remember: they're happy to remain blissfully ignorant about how their industry sucks tax revenues out of government coffers.
Labels:
Hollywood-Hypocrites,
Hollywood-phonies,
Kevin-Glass,
left-wing-elites,
tax-breaks-for-liberals,
Townhall,
vile-Steven-Spielberg
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Obama Disarmed Marines During Inauguration
B. Hussein Obama disarmed the United States Marines during the too torturous to watch inauguration. It looks like arming the Muslim brotherhood is the way to go and then disarm the American Military? Can we see how upside down America is right now?
Read below on the great research from Katie Pavlich. She is a News Editor, at one of the best sites online, Townhall.com.
Marines Were Disarmed for President Obama's Second Inaugural Parade
He's gutted their healthcare, plans to cut their pay and apparently, doesn't trust them either. David Codrea over at Gun Rights Examiner points out that Marines marching in President Obama's second inaugural parade recently were caring rifles without bolts, meaning they were removed.
“Didn't know the Marines had to take the bolts out of their rifles for the Inaugural,” an email forwarded to Gun Rights Examiner from a United States Marine Corps source observed. “Wonder if someone can explain why [they] would be marching in the inaugural parade with no bolts in their rifles!”
The email linked to a YouTube video of the 57th Presidential Inaugural Parade, embedded in this column, featuring Bravo Company Marines from the Marine Barracks Washington. Sure enough, the observation in the email is confirmed by watching the video, with screen shots provided in the photo and slide show accompanying this article.
This prompted an internet search to see if others had also noticed, and the Blur-Brain blog had.
“The bolts have been removed from the rifles rendering them unable to fire a round,” the post stated. “Apparently Obama’s Secret Service doesn’t trust the USMC. Simply searching each guy to make sure he didn’t have a live round hidden on him wasn’t enough, they had to make sure the guns were inoperable.
Wondering if this may be an inauguration policy of long standing that transcends administrations, Gun Rights Examiner made a cursory search and found something even more curious. In the 2009 Inaugural Parade, the United States Navy marched with rifles that had not been so disabled (see 1:24 into that video plus the final slide).
As Gateway Pundit points out, this isn't the first time Marines have been disarmed for an Obama administration event.
“In a sign of the nervousness surrounding Mr. Panetta’s trip, the Marines and other troops who were waiting in a tent for the defense secretary to speak were abruptly asked by their commander to get up, place their weapons — M-16 and M-4 automatic rifles and 9-mm pistols — outside the tent and then return unarmed. The commander, Sgt. Maj. Brandon Hall, told reporters he was acting on orders from superiors.
“All I know is, I was told to get the weapons out,” he said. Asked why, he replied, “Somebody got itchy, that’s all I’ve got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust.”
Normally, American forces in Afghanistan keep their weapons with them when the defense secretary visits and speaks to them. The Afghans in the tent waiting for Mr. Panetta were not armed to begin with, as is typical.”

Labels:
9-mm-pistols,
Afghanistan,
Bravo-Company,
editor,
Gun-Rights,
Katie-Pavlich,
M-16- automatic-rifles,
M-4-automatic-rifles,
Marines,
Marines-Disarmed,
muslim-brotherhood,
news,
Obama,
Panetta,
Seals,
Townhall
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)