Monday, August 22, 2016
Mark Steyn and Sen. Cruz Respond to Sen. Schatz and Admiral Titley at Climate Science Hearing!
The Watermelon People (green on the outside and RED on the inside) have been pushing these global warming lies far too long. Now some of these Marxists want to "lock up" people who will not believe the lies.
The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'
What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?
By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer
May 26, 2014
Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research.
One frequently cited source for the consensus is a 2004 opinion essay published in Science magazine by Naomi Oreskes, a science historian now at Harvard. She claimed to have examined abstracts of 928 articles published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and found that 75% supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.
In 2013, John Cook, an Australia-based blogger, and some of his friends reviewed abstracts of peer-reviewed papers published from 1991 to 2011. Mr. Cook reported that 97% of those who stated a position explicitly or implicitly suggest that human activity is responsible for some warming. His findings were published in Environmental Research Letters.
Mr. Cook's work was quickly debunked. In Science and Education in August 2013, for example, David R. Legates (a professor of geography at the University of Delaware and former director of its Center for Climatic Research) and three coauthors reviewed the same papers as did Mr. Cook and found "only 41 papers—0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent—had been found to endorse" the claim that human activity is causing most of the current warming. Elsewhere, climate scientists including Craig Idso, Nicola Scafetta, Nir J. Shaviv and Nils- Axel Morner, whose research questions the alleged consensus, protested that Mr. Cook ignored or misrepresented their work.
Rigorous international surveys conducted by German scientists Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch—most recently published in Environmental Science & Policy in 2010—have found that most climate scientists disagree with the consensus on key issues such as the reliability of climate data and computer models. They do not believe that climate processes such as cloud formation and precipitation are sufficiently understood to predict future climate change.
Surveys of meteorologists repeatedly find a majority oppose the alleged consensus. Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.
There is no basis for the claim that 97% of scientists believe that man-made climate change is a dangerous problem.
Mr. Bast is president of the Heartland Institute. Dr. Spencer is a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite.
See the Full Article at The Wall Street Journal Here
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Obama, like your pal Al Sharptongue, you must think we igament. We ain’t igament; we jus’ know our American History, which you sure as hell don’t.
You claimed that we aren’t a Christian nation. Wrong, m’ boy. . this nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. How can you, as a professed Constitutional scholar, disagree with it if you never bothered to read it for yourself ? Have someone read The Constitution to you. Seriously.
You claimed that this nation will never go to war against Islam. You must have forgotten to tell us the part about Islam declaring war on us. Huh?
You’ve apologized everywhere you’ve traveled, for what you perceive as the sins we’ve committed against other peoples. Can you tell me precisely who authorized you to shoot off your mouth & lie through your teeth to apologize for this exceptional nation of 330+ million exceptional people?
You claim that Islam and Muslims have contributed all manner of noble and positive things to the United States since its founding. Your claims are fiction. They can’t be found in any recorded history. What R U smoking?
Our Constitution states categorically that no official religion shall be established in this nation. Christ, Moses or Allah have no special place or privileges in the everyday function of this Government, at any level. All legitimate citizens are free to believe and practice their religions as they wish but – in no way are they permitted to force their belief systems on anyone else. Never, ever! Shariah is for lunatics, not Americans.
After your final term as president, you’ll be free to bloviate and lie till the cows come home – you’ll be able to talk, talk, talk until your gums turn blue – no one will givvashit. You’ll be relieved of the burden of traveling the world in Air Force One so, you might consider using your time to educate yourself in the real history of this nation although as I just mentioned, no one will givvashit. You’ll be history, m’boy – and I might add – good riddance.MORT KUFF © 7-4-2016
Monday, June 20, 2016
Once again, our local version of the ‘Three Stooges’ have proven just how bankrupt they are when it comes to logic & common sense, morality, principled policies, love of country and facing radical Islamist terrorism - and just how corrupt they are at playing partisan politics. It is beyond disgusting.
The delusional Democrats who continue to elect & re-elect such fools to represent them in the Congress are in reality, fooling themselves. They deserve what they get but sadly, the rest of us are being terribly mis-represented at the same time, by these same fools. An immoral majority of S.E. Florida voters need to revisit their loyalty to many-times failed Democrat policies. Try thinking.
The knee-jerk reaction of these Three Stooges to the Orlando shooting massacre, follows in the path of their mentor the late, thug-brained Sen.Ted Kennedy. He never failed to rush to judgment and the conclusion that the answer to Islamist terrorism was more gun control; the answer to failed economic policy was a higher minimum wage and the answer to our failed education system was more ludicrous education policies and oh, don’t forget, publicly-funded abortion.
Deutch, Frankel & Murphy are grossly incompetent at every- thing except corruption, dereliction of duty and malfeasance of office. Keep that in mind when you vote for Hillary.
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Obama is angry.
He is also living in a mind-set that has zilch to do with the reality of life on this Earth.
In his third day of speeches following the horrific massacre in the Gay club in Orlando, he went off on a tear that included the usual creation of straw men for him to knock down; accusations against the Republicans in Congress for opposing his policies; and hurling a personal attack against the presumptive (R) candidate Trump, accusing him inaccurately, of proposing to ban all Muslim immigration. Obama creates pot holes.
Following his long-established pattern, Obama conjured up false narratives as if they had actually been espoused by someone – and then proceeded to ridicule them with all the acerbic sarcasm of which he is capable. None of it makes any sense. Nada.
He then took off on a wild-eyed tirade about his seven plus years of avoiding the use of the term, “radical Islamist terrorism”. He posited the non-argument that use of this term wouldn’t change a thing and certainly, wouldn’t stop the extremists from committing their continuing reign of terror against innocent civilians. No one in this nation has been known to claim such a stupid premise and yet, Obama displayed an off-the-chart outrage at ‘these people’. Obama creates pot holes and then invariably, steps in them.
Then, as if he were ripping the scab off a half-healed wound, he launched into yet, another rant against gun ownership, especially what he referred to as a ‘war weapon’, the AR-15 rifle. What this anti-military Coward-in-Chief doesn’t know about weaponry, would fill a giant, ocean-going container ship. Just as there is no cure for ‘stupid’, there is no solution readily available for this man’s ‘willful ignorance’. All serious attempts at educating him to factual reality have ended in utter failure. He is simply ineducable.
Obama is someone who is boiling over with anger in addition to exhibiting the stunning manifestations of his classic Narcissism. These maladies, coupled with his outsize arrogance and his urgent need to express his Islamist ideology every-hour-on-the-hour, leave precious little room for his wide-ranging mood swings.
The sooner he leaves the Oval Office with all its responsibilities that he has managed to side-step for 7.5 years, the happier we’ll all be. If he were to take up residence in Syria, we’d be even more chipper. At least he’d be in his element. What a dipshit.
MORT KUFF © 6-15-2016
Monday, June 13, 2016
The White House can't speak.
Has anyone noticed? The White House. located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., is an edifice made of brick & mortar that has been painted 'white'. It is a mute structure; it can't speak. Therefore, statements represented as coming from the White House, are either statements coming directly from the President or, indirectly from his authorized spokespeeps.
Are you with me so far?
Why should we be expected to believe any pronouncements that are veiled in anonymity as, 'the authoritative word being handed down, from the White House'? If the information being sent from 'on high' to the citizens of the United States - who by the way, are the sole owners of that edifice and have hired its occupants for a limited engagement - is indeed meant to be taken as 'official', then it should be in the form of an official document, signed by its originator.
Are you still with me?
What's the problem here? The problem is that old bugaboo, the issue of 'Transparency in Government'. There never seems to be any shyness about taking credit for 'successes'. But, there seems to be a great deal of reticence when it comes to attaching a name to statements or pronouncements whenever there is concern from 'on high', that the message is calculated to either generate controversy or worse, is likely not be received with overwhelming acceptance. Are we clear?
And so, as a natural-born citizen of the United States of America and part-owner of that edifice located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW in Washington, D.C., I have appointed myself as a Committee of One, to hereby demand that every official statement or pronouncement that emanates from 'The White House', be signed by the individual who sent it, accompanied by his or her official title. Thus, a name and a title indicating that individual's identity and official relationship to the President, will be established and made known to the public. Got that?
I don't think it is too much to ask that our elected officials and their appointees be required to publically stand behind their 'official' statements - all their statements, every single one. So please - no more anonymous proclamations, pronouncements or propaganda issued from, The White House. The White House can't speak - remember?
Attention, complicit Members of the Fourth Estate - that would be alla yez: Are you able to process the info above? If not, contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org and I'll 'splain it to you.
MORT KUFF © 10-15-2013