Tuesday, February 7, 2017
We feel this is very important for the Country.
Senators' deceptions threaten Court nominee
This is from the Desk Of Mat Staver, Chairman, of Liberty Counsel.
Senate Democrats have launched an intense campaign to demonize Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch by labeling him as being a misogynist, a man who places the rights of big business over individuals, excessively pro-Wall Street, and an extremist.
In spite of all of the threats and hurtful labels, Judge Gorsuch is on a whirlwind schedule this week to meet with a dozen Democrat Senators, including Diane Feinstein, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Feinstein, along with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, will likely spearhead the Democrats' efforts to stop the nomination.
Ironically, this week Judge Gorsuch will be meeting with some of the same senators who helped unanimously confirm him to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2006.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell believes he knows the answer. In an op-ed published by Politico, Sen. McConnell wrote,
"Turns out, much of the opposition we're seeing from far left groups and Democratic senators isn't really about Judge Gorsuch at all. It's about President Donald Trump.
Even before the president announced Gorsuch as his nominee, we read headlines like, 'Democrats Launch Scorched-Earth Strategy Against Trump.' We heard the Democratic leader promise to fight whoever he nominated to the court 'tooth-and-nail.' Now some of Senator Schumer's colleagues are attempting to paint this nominee as an 'extremist' and are calling for a filibuster before the ink is even dry on his nomination."
Contrary the the Democrats' propaganda, Judge Neil Gorsuch will help reestablish the rule of law in our nation, help restore the integrity of the Supreme Court, and help honor the legacy of Antonin Scalia in his rulings.
Now is the time to return this country to the rule of law through which judges interpret the original meaning of the Constitution and the laws before them.
Liberty Counsel's "Save Our Courts, Save Our Nation" campaign includes a citizen petition drive in support of Judge Gorsuch's confirmation. As you likely know, this is going to be an intense confirmation battle and we need as many signatures as possible for maximum impact. Using Liberty Counsel's Rapid Sign technology, one click here and your name will be automatically and immediately added to the petition.
It's about politics, not Judge Gorsuch's record!
As noted by Majority Leader McConnell, one Democrat senator "lauded Judge Gorsuch for his 'sense of fairness and impartiality that is a keystone of being a judge.' In the words of President Obama's law school mentor, "He's a 'brilliant, terrific guy who would do the Court's work with distinction.'"
We would like to deliver our first wave of petitions to the Senate as soon as we have 50,000 signatures with an ultimate goal of 100,000+ petition signatures, but we are less than halfway to our first goal.
Join us by clicking here to have your name immediately and automatically included in this petition.
From the Supreme Court to the state and municipal courts, the role of judges is to judge fairly. Judge Neil Gorsuch has epitomized that judicial philosophy throughout his career. He is self-identified as a constitutional textualist, and precisely what the Supreme Court needs now with Justice Scalia gone.
The petitions will be delivered to key members of the Senate ahead of critical moments of the confirmation process.
Please take a few seconds and join with us HERE!
God bless you. And God bless America.
Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman
P.S. Liberty Counsel will aggressively work to see Judge Neil Gorsuch's confirmation through to a successful conclusion.
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Deneen Borelli | President Obama (#WorstPresidentEver) continues to undermine Trump before he takes office.
#CRlive - Conservative Review.
Deneen Borelli is the author of Blacklash: How Obama and the Left are Driving Americans to the Government Plantation.
Deneen Borelli is also the Chief Political Correspondent at Conservative Review, a website holding politicians accountable through a limited government perspective. Deneen is a regular contributor with Fox News and has appeared regularly on “Hannity,” “America’s Newsroom,” and with The 8 PMer, aka “The O’Reilly Factor,” “Fox & Friends,” and “Your World with Neil Cavuto.” She has also appeared on Fox Business programs such as “Making Money with Charles Payne,” and “Lou Dobbs Tonight.” Deneen has also appeared on TheBlazeTV’s “The Glenn Beck Program.” You might have previously seen Deneen scaring the ignorant Left Wingers on MSNBC, CNN, the BBC and C-SPAN.
Deneen has written for TheBlaze.com, TheDailyCaller.com, Newsmax Insider, and Fox News Opinion and her commentaries on the importance of freedom and limited government have been published by newspapers such as the Washington Times, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, Chicago Tribune, Sacramento Bee, Baltimore Sun, Washington Examiner and Washington Times.
Monday, January 2, 2017
No one has asked me but . . . .
if they had - I would have told them of my choice for the tailor-made, perfect fit for the extremely vital job of running this nation’s foreign affairs, as Secretary of State, it is . . . John Bolton.
He is hands down, the ideal man for the job – by qualifications, directly-related experience, talent and temperament.
It is my considered assessment that there is no more singularly-suited man for this job. I say, ‘man for this job’ because most recently, we’ve had three women (I include John F. Kerry as one of them) occupying the top Diplomat position at Dept. of State; each has proven spectacularly incompetent.
This is not to infer that there are no women in this nation who would be able to do a creditable job of diplomatic planning and decision-making. Far from it; there are plenty of women who could. However, I believe that in the age we’re living in, the cards are stacked against women. This is primarily due to the bigoted, misogynistic attitudes and practices entrenched in so many of the dozens of backward, Islamist-dominated countries all across the Globe. They hold women, all women, in disdain. So therefore, will never accept them as equals in any regard. Until that situation changes, the Secretary of State must remain, ‘a man’s job’.
At this time, John Bolton is the man of the hour. He has a vast store of knowledge about how diplomacy works. That wisdom spans the gamut of the convoluted ins & outs of international diplomacy. He knows a sizeable segment of the current world leaders on a one-to-one basis. He enjoys the trust and respect of all our allies and a goodly portion of those forces that have declared themselves to be enemies of the United States.
The person who is placed in the driver’s seat of our diplomatic efforts, must be smart, strong, experienced, wily and resolute. John Bolton fits the bill.
MORT KUFF © 11-29-2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
This is a portion of the transcript of Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke subbing for Glenn Beck on his radio Show. he transcript may have some slight errors.
Let me start with an introduction: I'm your host for today, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. You may know me. You may not know me. It's irrelevant at this point. I'm the host today.
Let me take care of a couple of housekeeping measures first. This is the Glenn Beck Program. Glenn Beck is a brand. Glenn Beck has built this brand. He's worked hard at it. He's good at what he does. Every once in a while, he allows somebody to pilot the ship. I've done it before for him. It's an honor to be with you this morning and to be a part of this brand, the Glenn Beck Program. And I're to the protect the brand. But at the same time, as always, TheBlaze has given me the freedom to express my views, and they may differ from some of the things that Glenn says not many. They may differ from some of the things that you believe and espouse and so on and so forth. And that's okay.
I don't mind discourse. But I'm here to protect the brand. Not only to me, but it's important to Glenn as well, but there may be some times, some rocky moments. But I always remind the people tuning in, don't take it out on Glenn, please. Don't take it out on TheBlaze. Take it out on me. I have big shoulders. I get blamed for a lot of stuff. I get piled on a lot. It's kind of the environment I'm in. I don't whine about it. So if I say something that rubs you the wrong way or whatever, you feel like you want to call in and talk about it, the number is 888-727-BECK. That's 888-727-2325.
What's coming up on the program today? Well, first, we're going to start out with an election wrap-up. I know the election has been over since November 8th, November 9th. And; but there's a lot going on still. Today's a big day. The electoral college meets. That's when they truly pick the president of the United States, by the Constitution, by the law, and that will happen sometime today. All 50 states will gather. Their electors. And they'll make that determination.
If we go by the states that were won on November 8th, Donald Trump should be elected, duly elected, president of the United States, by the electoral college. But, you know, we're in some weird times. And some goofy things have happened and some goofy things will continue to happen. People continue to try to work the electors of the electoral college. Going to talk about that in one of the segments down the road.
Also going to talk about immigration. That is going to be a big issue for this upcoming Congress, the new Congress that will be seated on January 20th as well.
And the first 100 days are always talked about. A president; a new administration comes in. Even if the president is reelected and he starts another term, the first 100 days are important. They set the tone. The first 100 days is an opportunity, if you will, for the incoming president to set the stage, set the vision for the country, get some things going. It's very important they get off to a fast start. That's why they have this concept called the first 100 days. And I'll tell you what, it can make or break an administration. If you get bogged down, you will be that way, and you will struggle. So you've got to get out of the gate fast. Donald Trump plans to do just that, as he's putting his cabinet together. But immigration is one of those things this new Congress is going to have to take up.
It was one of the major platforms of the Trump campaign. Immigration reform. Closing the border. Building the wall. So on and so forth. There's some other things that he wants to address in that first 100 days as well, the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. So we'll talk about the immigration aspect of it because it's going to be big.
And there's many facets to that, as you may know. So I want to hear from you on that. Again, that number is 888-727-BECK. 888-727-2325.
Also, this first hour, we're going to talk about the opioid epidemic sweeping America. Folks, I want to tell you that this thing is touching everybody. It is a crisis. It's not getting all the attention; it's getting some media attention. But it's not getting all the attention that I think it should be. Because we're talking about a generation now of people, specifically young people, who have been gripped by this opioid and heroin epidemic. And we'll talk about that.
Also, I'll be joined by Heather Mac Donald, author of The War on Cops. Heather is a researcher, a Thomas W. Smith fellow at the Manhattan Institute. She's a contributing editor of the City Journal Magazine. She's written several books. Her latest one being The War on Cops. And we're going to talk about an article that was published in the Wall Street Journal over the weekend, how Donald Trump can change the rhetoric in the war on cops. So we'll be joined by her. And we'll have much, much more.
But here's where I want to start: This thing I opened up this program by saying I was not in a real good mood this morning. I learned over the weekend that President Obama in one final move, kicking law enforcement in the teeth by selecting an individual, Abu-Jamal. He's a cop killer. Actually, he didn't appoint Abu-Jamal. But Abu-Jamal is a cop killer, 1981, he killed Danny Faulkner in Philadelphia, a police officer who was 25 years old.
Abu-Jamal was a Black Panther. And what happened was the officer, Faulkner, made a traffic stop. A scuffle ensued. Abu-Jamal's brother was scuffling with the law enforcement officer. Abu-Jamal saw it. He came over. He shot and killed Officer Faulkner. Officer Faulkner was found face up, bullets in his back. He shot him before he hit the ground, then stood over him, straddled him, and shot him in the forehead. Very famous case.
Abu-Jamal was convicted and sentenced to death. And then in a turn of events, he was granted a new trial because there was an error in the jury instructions on a death penalty. So they settled the case, giving him life in prison without parole.
Anyway, there was an attorney. Debo Adegbile. Debo Adegbile was an attorney for the NAACP, the legal defense fund. He was not representing Abu-Jamal. Abu-Jamal had competent counsel, but he entered a brief into the case; a friend of the court, talking about Debo Adegbile.
Debo Adegbile is a straight-up cop hater and a black racialist. Several times President Obama tried to jam Debo Adegbile down our throats, first by nominating him to be a federal judge and then tried to nominate him; both of these required US Senate confirmation. He tried to nominate him to head the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice.
Now, keep in mind, Debo Adegbile is a straight-up cop hater. He's not a good fit to lead the civil rights division of the United States Department of Justice. He's also not a good fit to be a federal judge.
Because like I said, he's a black racialist. He sees everything through the lens of race. Thinks all whites are racist. The Senate struck down his; his judgeship. And then he withdrew; Adegbile withdrew his name from consideration for the US DOJ Civil Rights Division post because he wasn't going to be confirmed.
Well, in one last move, President Obama put this individual; I got to be careful here. But I said I'm not in a good mood today. But he put him on the US DOJ Civil Rights Division, in an appointment that's going to last six years. A kick in the teeth to every law enforcement officer in the country.
This is who Barack Obama is. Barack Obama is also a straight-up cop hater. I've said that before. I've said that on TV, nationally. And people would ask, ;Do you really believe that President Obama is a cop hater? And I'd look them right back in the eye and go, Yes, I do, and I can prove it. And I'd go on to state these instances. This is just one. But you remember the Cambridge, Massachusetts, case, where a friend of Obama's was arrested by Cambridge Police. And Obama said the police officers academy stupidly in arresting his friend.
No, they didn't. They were doing their job. That started it.
Obama was also very intricate in starting the war on cops. So we'll see how this goes. I think incoming US attorney Jeff Sessions would do well to find a spot, if they can't stop this move — to find some spot in some corner office and have Debo Adegbile counting paper clips. That's kind of what needs to happen. We're going to take a break. On the other side, we're going to come back, and we're going to talk some post-election wrap-up. I'm Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. This is the Glenn Beck Radio Program.
DAVID: Welcome back to the program. I'm your host for today. Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. This is the Glenn Beck Program.
I'm here with you tomorrow too. I don't know if that's going to be good or bad news for you. Joined us today, I think it will be good news. But I'll let you know as well. Two days, so I can get some stuff going here.
Let me do a little self-promoting before I get into the first topic, which is going to be some post election results.
You can follow me on Twitter @SheriffClarke. And that's C-L-A-R-K-E. Don't forget the e, otherwise, you might get some other Twitter handle. And you'll look, and you'll say, ;What the heck is this; That's the good stuff, folks. That's the stuff the national; the liberal media pays attention to. And they look every time I put out a tweet to try to contort it into something I did not say. But that's okay.
But it's @SheriffClarke. C-L-A-R-K-E. I also have a blog. You can follow me on my blog, and it's ThePeoplesSheriff@Patheos.com. Patheos is P-A-T-H-E-O-S. And I also have a book coming out. My first book is going to be coming out in March of 2017. But you can preorder it now at Amazon, or you can go to Barnes & Noble and get your preorder in.
What's this book about? It's called Cop Under Fire. As you may know, we've become an increasingly divided and polarized nation in recent years, growing racial tension. You have animosity toward law enforcement professionals. Government corruption and disregard for our constitutional process. There's no easy answers to these. This book is not just going to be a recitation of things that are problematic in America. I don't say wrong in America. We have some problems. We have some issues. But it's not going to be the same, you know, here are the issues facing America. But what I try to do is take those things that deeply affect us, and I point out in this book, Cop Under Fire, how we can rise above these current troubles and these issues and we can truly become that great nation in pursuit of liberty and justice from all. So, again, that's Cop Under Fire at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. You can preorder that, in you have a law enforcement friend, if you have a law enforcement officer retired or current in your family. It's going to be a must read if you; even citizens in general. It's going to be a fascinating book, not just because I wrote it. But it comes from the heart. And anybody that has listened to me over the last, I don't know, three, four, five, years, you know, I speak from the heart. I don't pull any punches. I don't hold anything back. I just tell you the way I see it. Am I right on everything? Of course not. Do I have all the answers? Not hardly.
However, I put it to you straight. Straight talk is what you're going to get from me. Unvarnished. And I offer some things that are food for thought for a way forward.
Now, let's get into this post election, presidential election. 2016. Happened on November 8th. A lot has been said about it. Much has been talked about, but you haven't heard my perspective on this thing.
We may differ a little bit on some of the things here, but like I said, I don't shy away from that. I believe discourse, differing points of view, different schools of thought, I believe that stuff is healthy in a democracy. We should be able to politely disagree. Some spirited discourse back and forth. Nothing wrong with that. I love that. Like I said, I think it's healthy in a democracy. And it shouldn't denigrate into the name-calling and some of the other things that it does when people differ with somebody else's views. Let's just have educated conversation and skip all the other stuff. You know, I mean, if you say something; for instance, if somebody has different views on gay marriage, all of a sudden you're a homophobe. You know, if you believe that the United States is a Judeo-Christian nation; not to the exclusion of any other religion. Did not say that. But if you believe that the principles that this country are founded on were Judeo-Christian, if you believe that, then you're an Islamophobe. Right? That's what it denigrates into.
And you can go on and on and on. You're a racist if you believe in the Constitution, the rule of law, the Founding Fathers, the history of this nation, you're a racist. And that's what everything seems to end up; where everything seems to end up, and it's very unfortunate. Because like I said, you know, with critical thought, we truly can move this nation forward and become this shining city on the hill that I believe we already are. But we've gotten away from some concepts that have grounded this nation and led it to be that shining city on a hill. But if we just allow people to shut down people we don't agree with, it's not going to be very good.
But, you know, the post election, I look back; and I supported Donald Trump for president of the United States. I supported him after the primary. I stayed out of endorsing anybody in the primary, Republican primary, I'm talking about. First of all, I'm not a member of the Republican Party. I'm not a member of the Democrat Party.
I run as a Democrat. Sheriff in Milwaukee County. I'm elected as a Democrat. But I don't belong to a political party. I don't believe in belonging to a political party. If you do, that's your business. I don't care what your politics are. It's neither here nor there. But that's why I didn't endorse anybody in the Republican Party. I wanted the people — we, the people, the members of that party to select a candidate. So I stayed out of the way. I had numerous candidates ask me to endorse them during the primary. I stayed out of it. I made it clear. I'm keeping my powder dry. But I made this clear to whoever comes out of this process as the nominee for the Republican Party, I will back and I will back 100 percent.
Folks, I'm a man of my word. And when I say something, you can take it to the bank. So Donald Trump obviously was the victor. And he came back around to me and asked for support. And I said to him, Mr. President; he wasn't president at the time. I said, Mr. Trump, I don't know what I can do for you. But I made it clear I'd back whoever won. You are the winner. I will do everything I can. I will fight as hard as I can to help you become the 45th president of the United States. That's how I arrived at my decision.
And I just believe that after that process, the convention, which I spoke at; that was an honor. I thought it was time for conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, some independents, to put all that stuff aside in the name of the country. That's what I did. And that's why I supported Donald Trump. I offered no apology. I'm just trying to tell you where I came from in that decision. But you look at what's happening now with this; this whole process. Election is over. The election is over. We have a president-elect, his name is Donald Trump. He's putting his government together. He's putting his cabinet together.
And he needs our support, folks, for the country. All right? The left even today, with the electoral college, they don't want to believe that the election is over. But it is.
We need to take a break. On the other side, we'll continue this. This is Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke in for Glenn Beck. This is the Glenn Beck Program.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
It is so ironic that a Japanese person, from a country we and our allies defeated when they were allies with Germany , wrote so brilliantly about the fatal problems that have been facing Israel since the end of the war in which they were allied with those who wanted to annihilate Jews! This is a brilliant assessment.
By Yashiko Sagamori
If you are so sure that ' Palestine , the country, goes back through most of recorded history,' I expect you to be able to answer a few basic questions about that country of Palestine :
1. When was it founded and by whom?
2. What were its borders?
3. What was its capital?
4. What were its major cities or name one major city?
5. What constituted the basis of its economy?
6. What was its form of government?
7. Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat?
8. Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation?
9. What was the language of the country of Palestine?
10. What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine?
11. What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and tell what was the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against the US dollar, German mark, GB pound, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan on that date.
12. And, finally, since there is no such country today, what caused its demise and when did it occur?
You are lamenting the 'low sinking' of a 'once proud' nation. Please tell me, when exactly was that 'nation' proud and what was it so proud of?
And here is the least sarcastic question of all: If the people you mistakenly call 'Palestinians' are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over -- or thrown out of -- the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War.
I hope you avoid the temptation to trace the modern day 'Palestinians' to the Biblical Philistines: substituting etymology for history won't work here.
The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel ; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it 'the Palestinian people' and installed it in Gaza , Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the 'West Bank' and Gaza, respectively?
The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza , Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so-called 'Palestinians' have only one?motivation: the destruction of Israel , and in?my book that is not sufficient to consider them a nation' -- or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled
In fact, there is only one way to achieve peace in the Middle East . Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel 's ancient sovereignty over Gaza , Judea, and Samaria .
That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again was its beginning?