Tuesday, November 15, 2016

A Japanese description of the Palestinians.....

It is so ironic that a Japanese person, from a country we and our allies defeated when they were allies with Germany , wrote so brilliantly about the fatal problems that have been facing Israel since the end of the war in which they were allied with those who wanted to annihilate Jews! This is a brilliant assessment.

By Yashiko Sagamori

If you are so sure that ' Palestine , the country, goes back through most of recorded history,' I expect you to be able to answer a few basic questions about that country of Palestine :

1. When was it founded and by whom?

2. What were its borders?

3. What was its capital?

4. What were its major cities or name one major city?

5. What constituted the basis of its economy?

6. What was its form of government?

7. Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat?

8. Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation?

9. What was the language of the country of Palestine?

10. What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine?

11. What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and tell what was the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against the US dollar, German mark, GB pound, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan on that date.

12. And, finally, since there is no such country today, what caused its demise and when did it occur?

You are lamenting the 'low sinking' of a 'once proud' nation. Please tell me, when exactly was that 'nation' proud and what was it so proud of?

And here is the least sarcastic question of all: If the people you mistakenly call 'Palestinians' are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over -- or thrown out of -- the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War.

I hope you avoid the temptation to trace the modern day 'Palestinians' to the Biblical Philistines: substituting etymology for history won't work here.

The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel ; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it 'the Palestinian people' and installed it in Gaza , Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the 'West Bank' and Gaza, respectively?

The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza , Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so-called 'Palestinians' have only one?motivation: the destruction of Israel , and in?my book that is not sufficient to consider them a nation' -- or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled

In fact, there is only one way to achieve peace in the Middle East . Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel 's ancient sovereignty over Gaza , Judea, and Samaria .

That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again was its beginning?

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Scumbags of the MSM Won't Report the Black Violence against Cops

This article below is written by Colin Flaherty and is loaded with facts. These facts will not be presented by the Traitors of the MSM (Mainstream Media). Some of the language is from the Thugs in the #blackLIESmatter gang so it is offensive. Yet that is how the Left Wingers roll, violent and offensive.

Media Ignore the Tsunami of Black Violence against Cops
By Colin Flaherty

The shootings in Dallas did not make much of a difference. Not to the reporters explaining the protest and the reason behind the assassination of five police officers.

The reason for the demonstration was simple and beyond pushback:

White cops shoot black people all over the country, all the time, for no reason whatsoever.

Everybody knows that. So sad.

Some took it to the next level: The head of a black group called Dallas Action said the killings were a wake up call to let people know how cops are picking on black people.

All the time.

For no reason whatsoever. The local Fox reporter in Dallas took the comments in stride, quickly changing the topic to all the pretty lights on nearby police cars.

Not one reporter at any point even hinted at how black violence is wildly out of proportion.

Not one reporter talked to any cop willing to tell the truth about how police are relentless victims of black hostility and violence and murder — all over the country.

And how black on cop violence and defiance are now the default response.

Not the other way around. A brief magical mystery tour of black on cop violence over the last few weeks.

In Baltimore, one week ago, hundreds of black people took to the streets to celebrate the life of the recently killed rapper Lor Scoota. He was best known for celebrating guns, drugs, money and bitches in his videos and in his life.

Eventually cops showed up: They were greeted with bottles and rocks and threats and taunts when they suggested to the hundreds of black people that destroying property and disobeying the law was not a good idea.

The police chief dutifully defended the rioters, reminding the Baltimore audience that event was largely peaceful.

As was Dallas.

Top political figures in Baltimore made their way to the scene of the crimes to blame police for antagonizing the black people. As usual, the Baltimore Sun and other local media wagged their tails and went along with the story: the greatest hoax of our lifetimes — the lie of black victimization. All documented in that scintillating best seller Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.

In Syracuse on Father’s Day in the ghetto, 500 black people were blowing some weed and shooting some guns when a female cop showed up.

The videos show the crowds fleeing the gunfire as the officer runs towards it. When her backup arrived, they found the cop on the ground, surrounded by a large group of black people beating and kicking her and trying to steal her gun.

One black man was running around, pleading for a gun to shoot the police.

The next night, the cops returned and received similar scorn, hostility and violence.

The local papers pretended they had never heard of anything like that before, when, truth is: That is a regular part of life in Syracuse.

On July 4, on North Beach in South Haven, Michigan, black people threw rocks and bottles at cops, whose only fault was they did not like black people throwing rocks and bottles at beach goers.

In Baton Rouge, the night following the death of Alton Sterling, the saint with a long record of crime and violence who was killed resisting arrest for threatening people with a gun, hundreds of black people took to the streets to sing the new black national anthem: Fuck the Police.

police think they have the authority to kill a minority.

Ice Cube will swarm

On any muthafucka in a blue uniform

Just cuz I'm from the CPT, punk police are afraid of me

A young nigga on a warpath

And when I'm finished, it's gonna be a bloodbath

You remember Ice Cube: He’s the smiling old grandpa of TV and movie fame, still preaching violence against the police.

In Oklahoma City, a black high school teacher took to Facebook to declare that all white hillbillies should die in a tornado. The local school discovered the First Amendment, and the local TV news gang said we should forgive him because he said he was sorry.

This kind of generosity is missing, of course, in dozens and dozens of news stories of recent cases around the country where white people make an off hand remark about race and find themselves out of a career.

Like the firefighter in a suburb of Boston in June, who was part of a crew responding to a violent party of 1000 black people who said he wanted to turn the hose on them.


Read the entire article HERE at the American Thinker.


Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 12, 2016

Benghazi 9/11/12: The Obama White House Deception

This is a terrific explanation from Martin Harry on the horrific Benghazi attack on 9/11/12.
Why did the Obama Regime and Hillary Clinton Lie about this attack? Well the terrorist attacks which killed four brave Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/12 threatened Obama's re-election.

After campaigning on the theme that he had decimated al-Qaeda he sought to cover-up al-Qaeda's involvement in the Benghazi attacks. We can all remember that Soetoro sent out the Vile Susan Rice to lie all over TV about this Islamo-Nazi attack. When the cover-up fell apart, the Obama Administration then sought to cover-up the cover-up. This deception continued after the President's re-election.

The attack went on for 13 Hours and there was no sign of Obama. Where was he hiding?

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 22, 2016

Ted Cruz and Mark Steyn Crush Global Warming Lunatics

Mark Steyn and Sen. Cruz Respond to Sen. Schatz and Admiral Titley at Climate Science Hearing!

The Watermelon People (green on the outside and RED on the inside) have been pushing these global warming lies far too long. Now some of these Marxists want to "lock up" people who will not believe the lies.

Also see:

The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'

What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?
By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer
May 26, 2014

Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research.

One frequently cited source for the consensus is a 2004 opinion essay published in Science magazine by Naomi Oreskes, a science historian now at Harvard. She claimed to have examined abstracts of 928 articles published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and found that 75% supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.

In 2013, John Cook, an Australia-based blogger, and some of his friends reviewed abstracts of peer-reviewed papers published from 1991 to 2011. Mr. Cook reported that 97% of those who stated a position explicitly or implicitly suggest that human activity is responsible for some warming. His findings were published in Environmental Research Letters.

Mr. Cook's work was quickly debunked. In Science and Education in August 2013, for example, David R. Legates (a professor of geography at the University of Delaware and former director of its Center for Climatic Research) and three coauthors reviewed the same papers as did Mr. Cook and found "only 41 papers—0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent—had been found to endorse" the claim that human activity is causing most of the current warming. Elsewhere, climate scientists including Craig Idso, Nicola Scafetta, Nir J. Shaviv and Nils- Axel Morner, whose research questions the alleged consensus, protested that Mr. Cook ignored or misrepresented their work.

Rigorous international surveys conducted by German scientists Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch—most recently published in Environmental Science & Policy in 2010—have found that most climate scientists disagree with the consensus on key issues such as the reliability of climate data and computer models. They do not believe that climate processes such as cloud formation and precipitation are sufficiently understood to predict future climate change.

Surveys of meteorologists repeatedly find a majority oppose the alleged consensus. Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.

There is no basis for the claim that 97% of scientists believe that man-made climate change is a dangerous problem.

Mr. Bast is president of the Heartland Institute. Dr. Spencer is a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite.

See the Full Article at The Wall Street Journal Here

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 28, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

Obama, like your pal Al Sharptongue, you must think we igament.  We ain’t igament; we jus’ know our American History, which you sure as hell don’t.

You claimed that we aren’t a Christian nation.  Wrong, m’ boy. . this nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles.  How can you, as a professed Constitutional scholar, disagree with it if you never bothered to read it for yourself ?  Have someone read The Constitution to you.  Seriously.
You claimed that this nation will never go to war against Islam.  You must have forgotten to tell us the part about Islam declaring war on us.  Huh?
You’ve apologized everywhere you’ve traveled, for what you perceive as the sins we’ve committed against other peoples. Can you tell me precisely who authorized you to shoot off your mouth & lie through your teeth to apologize for this exceptional nation of 330+ million exceptional people?
You claim that Islam and Muslims have contributed all manner of noble and positive things to the United States since its founding. Your claims are fiction. They can’t be found in any recorded history. What R U smoking?
Our Constitution states categorically that no official religion shall be established in this nation. Christ, Moses or Allah have no special place or privileges in the everyday function of this Government, at any level. All  legitimate citizens are free to believe and practice their religions as they wish but – in no way are they permitted to force their belief systems on anyone else.  Never, ever!  Shariah is for lunatics, not Americans.
After your final term as president, you’ll be free to bloviate and lie till the cows come home – you’ll be able to talk, talk, talk until your gums turn blue – no one will givvashit. You’ll be relieved of the burden of traveling the world in Air Force One so, you might consider using your time to educate yourself in the real history of this nation although as I just mentioned, no one will givvashit.   You’ll be history, m’boy – and I might add – good riddance.
                 MORT KUFF   © 7-4-2016   

Bookmark and Share