Saturday, April 5, 2014

MORT's meanderings


Palestinians and their 'Right of Return'.
Quite obviously, the so-called Palestinians who are constantly screaming about their 'right of return' to the homeland they never owned, know nothing of the ancient  'Rules of Retail'.
Since they cannot produce sales slips, printed receipts or any other proof of ownership, the claims of the Johnny-come-lately- so-called-Palestinians are null, void & invalid.  Their claims are treif phony baloney. It doesn't  slice.
The Israelis on the other hand, can show architectural proof of ownership in the form of what remains of the 'Western Wall' plus, the many architectural remains of synagogues buried deep under Muslim mosques and other pagan edifices all over Jerusalem.  Can you dig it, Muzzies?
If pressed, I'm positively certain that among the dusty, crumbling scrolls of Hebraic documents, today's Israeli scholars could produce original written documentation in the form of sales receipts for bricks & mortar purchased to build those ancient synagogues that predate any occupancy claimed by the true descendants of apes & pigs - the Isalameez.
Hamas and the other 'Merchants of Violence' can kick and scream until they are blue in their be-whiskered faces (pronounced 'feces') and will become  dust that blows across the sands of the Arabian peninsula for a few more centuries, before they could ever provide anything resembling valid proof of ownership of the Holy Land.  The lesson to be learned:  
                                        Keep your sales slips.

MORT KUFF  © 4-4-2014




Bookmark and Share

Thursday, April 3, 2014

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?


By Paul Harvey

Conveniently Forgotten Facts.

Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him.

When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbro took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black Panthers?

In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail.

The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College.

Isn't that something!!!

As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean!

Only in America!!!

Erica Huggins was the woman who served the Panthers by boiling the water for Mr. Rackley's torture ... Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easily?

Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of the Panthers.

These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial.

One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the United States Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No, neither!

The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the time. She is now known as The "smartest woman in the world." She is none other than the former Democratic Senator from the State of New York---- the former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And now, as Paul Harvey said; "You know the rest of the story".

This deserves the widest possible press. Also remember it when she runs for President!



Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Saul Alinsky on 8 levels of Control


Born: Saul David Alinsky, January 30, 1909, Chicago, Illinois

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, California

Education: University of Chicago, Ph.B. 1930, University of Chicago Graduate School, criminology, 1930–1932.

Occupation: Community organizer, writer, political activist

Notable works: Reveille for Radicals (1946); Rules for Radicals (1971)

Awards: Pacem in Terris Award, 1969

NOW IT ALL BECOMES CRYSTAL CLEAR!


Saul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. He is often noted for his book Rules for Radicals. From that book here are Saul's thoughts on how to create a social state:

There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people

2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.


Does any of this sound familiar?
The Alinsky student, Barry Soetoro, is well on his way to hammering home these means to control the People. The Evil Genius Behind Obama has planned this for years and the majority of the People accept this.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

A BUMP IN THE ROAD


Hillary Clinton thinks that with 4 dead Americans, "what difference at this point does it make" Sadly, she won't understand this poem. And remember Obama's calloused statement, “a bump in the road”?

I recall, however, the President referring to the Benghazi incident as "a bump in the road". Today I heard an ex-Navy Seal being interviewed regarding a book he has written about how to handle crisis situations in our lives. At the end of the interview he asked if he could make a comment on Benghazi and, of course, the anchor said yes.

He then thanked Fox News for keeping the Benghazi story in the news, since other news organizations are not. He said the Seals who died deserve that the public know the truth about the whole affair . . . but, the way things go these days that seems unlikely.

The poem was written by a MARINE CORPS Officer (ANON). Very thought provoking and poignant.
Please read it and pass it on . . . it's one way to keep the issue alive.


The Battling Boys of Benghazi
We're the Battling Boys of Benghazi,
no fame, no glory, no paparazzi.
Just a fiery death in a blazing hell
defending the country we loved so well.
It wasn't our job, but we answered the call,
fought to the consulate and scaled the wall.
We pulled twenty countrymen from the jaws of fate,
led them to safety and stood at the gate.
Just the two of us, and foes by the score,
but we stood fast to bar the door.
Three calls for reinforcement, but all were denied,
so we fought and we fought and we fought till we died.
We gave our all for our Uncle Sam
but Barack Obama didn't give a damn
just two dead SEALs who carried the load
no thanks to us - we were just "bumps in the road".



This article should be circulated as much as we can possibly keep it going. I think this is the feeling of the general population and it should be pursued until something is done with the incompetency in Washington who literally sat in the White House and State Department watching their execution on live streaming video and did absolutely nothing to save or rescue them.

--

The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living!


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

THE HOMICIDE OF TRADITION


The emergence of vitriolic radical liberalism has created uncivil, hostile reaction toward legitimate disagreements.
To mute anyone in opposition against them, their ploy is to accuse them of racism.

Many prominent members of their ilk are the real racists, because they choose to divide instead of unite, to promote
their ideology with the scent of socialism. In 2008 and 2012, without the white vote, Barack Obama could not be elected;
yet their argument is, he is losing favorability because of the color of his skin. It is not the color, it's the ply. He
is too thin skinned to accept criticism and his followers instinctively circle the wagons to protect his many weaknesses
and blunders. Among his critics are many prominent black conservatives of distinction. Are they to be labeled racists?

Standing in the way of implementing his and their agendas is tradition. It must be destroyed to move ahead. The
methods are visible in the form of legalizing marijuana, same sex marriage, invading individuals privacy, giving
in to foreign influence by following instead of leading, using the IRS against conservative enterprise, recognizing
undisciplined, pervasive, unattractive lifestyle individuals as friends of Barack and his administration who infringe
on the rights of others, using political correctness.

Through his illustrations, Norman Rockwell portrayed Traditional America with warmth of family and the perseverance
of the less fortunate to become a part of the American dream they knew can come with honest labor. Being a traditionalist
I partook in the opportunities that my country offered, up to my capabilities and ambition. It was up to me how much
I was willing to give that governed the heights I could reach. I could have exerted more effort to reach beyond my
present state. The responsibility was mine and not somebody else or the state to provide me with the style I would
have liked.

Tradition is the foundation of conservatism. To be a conservative means, you want to conserve the things our forefathers
fought for. Decency, tolerance, respect, morality, a father, mother family, Judeo-Christian values that transcends
into other legitimate, peaceful religions.

Copying Norman Rockwell, their version would depict a different portrait of America, lacking in the warmth of family
and the perseverance of the down trodden. Instead it will look like a page out of People Magazine, Starbucks, porn
movies passing as artistic endeavor, immodest freaks called celebrities, dirt bag athletes offered as role models,
fatherless households, teenage pregnancies, and the same sex marriage mockery. These are the hues in the liberal
picture.

Not all the blame can be laid on the President's door step. We are in an era of Tech Toys. There are miraculous
happenings in the technological world when used properly, but dangerous when improperly used, in the hands of morons.

Fourteen presidents were real time during my life span, so what I say has backing in offering my assessment of Barack
Obama and his administration. It is incompetency, deceit, blundering and hypocrisy. The media's evaluation differs
from mine, because their bias is part of the problem. Too many in the media with positions to air opinion, are products
of the sixties when nontraditional became fashionable and normal, and the nation's morals started to decline and decay.

I'm witnessing the President's favorability numbers plummeting and wonder why it took five years for academia, media
pundits and others so enamored with him to realize how unfit he is for the office. People like me, whom publishers,
editors, programmers and other so called experts in their tight knit club are ignored because, for them we don't
posses the right credentials they think is criteria for credibility.

Conservative article from George Giftos


Bookmark and Share