Showing posts with label Al-Gore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al-Gore. Show all posts
Friday, January 11, 2013
Fat Albert and Global Harming
The once handsome but now, grotesquely obese+ugly Al Gore has added yet another iconic ‘charm’’ to his charm bracelet of stupid actions. Actions that have been toxic to humans and harmful to the globe at large. He has sold his soul once again, this time – to Al Jazeera, that paragon publisher of truth, virtue & utter Islamic bullshit.
It seems that Fat Albert Bore (Gore) is currently rollicking in self-gratification at his most recent reincarnation. Who knows what he thinks he is doing this time or who he thinks he is?
He has just sold his share of a failing media mess to Al Jazeera, touting the total compatibility of both their philosophies. Now, isn’t that just too sweet for words?
No need to recount here, all the ways this non-entity has covered himself with a combination of nincompoop and rubber cement. Terribly smelly and quite sticky, I must say. But, for several decades, we’ve all been witness to the many public displays of his prowess as a Kabuki dancer, whose colorful flourishes are painfully symbolic evidence of his wide variety of psychological disorders.
While most of his antics were transparently stupid and likely to merely affect our health and sanity in a bad way, this ‘antic’ is overtly traitorous. It is diabolically calculated to open the door wide to a violently hostile, anti-American purveyor of Islamist-oriented disinformation. And in the process, to provide a national stage for more encroachment and more toxic pollution of our universal information sources. The obvious intent is to do real harm to our national security. Thanks a lot Al, old boy.
This time, ALGORE has crossed the line from being stupidly insipid to being an actual, treasonous tool for use by a sworn enemy of the United States of America. Even though he has sold his interest in this newly enhanced loud-speaker for evil, he says that he will sit on the Board of Al Jazeera. Might we presume that he is remaining available to add to his litany of prostitutions, while still retaining the honor and mantle of a former Vice President of the United States? How cute.
He must be held accountable and made to feel the consequences of his traitorous action. Whatever it takes.
MORT KUFF
More MORT’s meanderings HERE
Labels:
Al-Gore,
Al-Gore-lies,
Global-Warming-Fraud,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Mort-Kuff,
MORTs-Meanderings
Friday, February 25, 2011
Not a Big Al Gore Fan
I read in The Tico Times that the author of “A Convenient Lie” (aka “An Inconvenient Truth”), Al Gore, is coming to Costa Rica to propagandize his fallacious theory of “global warming” (Tico Times, Feb. 18).
Since he began his campaign to scare the world about manmade global warming, he has become a multi-, multi-millionaire by conning many countries into believing that his theories are based on scientific fact.
Most reputable climatologists have said that man is not responsible for any kind of climate change or global warming (by the way, Gore has no scientific background at all).
The consensus is that most changes, if there are any, are a direct result of sunspots, something that man cannot control it in any way whatsoever.
For someone to spend $300 for a ticket to this propaganda event is an exercise in futility and simply a donation to an already rich man.
Look for zero valid information coming from this conference of obfuscation and deceit.
As P.T. Barnum would say, “There’s a sucker born every minute.”
Chuck On The Right Side
Since he began his campaign to scare the world about manmade global warming, he has become a multi-, multi-millionaire by conning many countries into believing that his theories are based on scientific fact.
Most reputable climatologists have said that man is not responsible for any kind of climate change or global warming (by the way, Gore has no scientific background at all).
The consensus is that most changes, if there are any, are a direct result of sunspots, something that man cannot control it in any way whatsoever.
For someone to spend $300 for a ticket to this propaganda event is an exercise in futility and simply a donation to an already rich man.
Look for zero valid information coming from this conference of obfuscation and deceit.
As P.T. Barnum would say, “There’s a sucker born every minute.”
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Al-Gore,
Al-Gore-lies,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Conservative-Women,
Global-Warming-Fraud,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Stop-Marxism
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Tale of Two Houses

House #1
A 20 room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400 per month. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern 'snow belt' area. It's in the South.

House #2
Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every 'green' feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground.
The water (usually 67 degrees F) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.
======================================
HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; It is the home of CON Artist, I mean the 'Environmentalist' Al Gore.
HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas; it is the residence of the Ex-President of the United States, George W. Bush. A President with CLASS not like our current knuckle-head.
THIS is the definition of an "inconvenient truth"!
I sure hope this gets passed to everyone!
Hat Tip to B, #sgp !!!
Labels:
Al-Gore,
Al-Gore-lies,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Conservative-Women,
Global-Warming-Fraud,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Stop-Marxism
Monday, June 21, 2010
Cap & Tax will Destroy America! Stop Marxism!
Another great article below. This one was in the New York Post? I guess some more people are waking up to the fact that Obama and his Marxist Cap and Tax will further destroy America.
Bam's climate Rx: All pain, no gain
By PATRICK J. MICHAELS
The cap-and-trade bill that the House passed last summer aims to force Americans to reduce those dreaded carbon emissions by 83 percent in less than four decades -- to the same per-capita level as 1867. Yet, even under the Al Gore-approved climate-science models, the bill would do nothing to stop global warming.
The bill is 1,000-plus pages of rules, regulations, handouts, subsidies and whatever else House leaders deemed necessary. Not one of the 435 members read the whole monstrosity -- because the leadership dropped 300 new pages on their desks the night before they voted.
Yet the central point is clear enough: The bill simply drives up the price of fossil-fuel based energy so high that the nation will have to somehow get along with only 17 percent of the gasoline and fossil-fuel-powered electricity that it uses today.
Don't ask how much it will cost. No one really knows, since you can't put a price on something that has yet to be defined.
Last Tuesday, President Obama cited the BP blowout as reason for the Senate to pass its version of the House bill. But senators know that expensive emission reductions are profoundly unpopular. Congress members found this out last summer when protests erupted nationwide within 24 hours of the bill's passage. Polls also suggest that a vote for the warming bill (especially on top of a vote for the health-care bill) is not a good way to keep a job in Congress this November.
And, again, the bills (neither the House-like Kerry-Lieberman tome, nor the climate-change lite by Indiana's Sen. Richard Lugar) would do nothing measurable about climate change.
The median guess from the United Nations is that, if we do nothing to change our ways, the average world surface temperature will rise about 5 degrees Fahrenheit this century. (In fact, the trends in recent decades strongly suggest that this is an overestimate -- but let's accept it for the sake of the argument.)
Now, if only the United States does change its ways, by adopting something like the House bill, we'd prevent about two-tenths of a degree of that warming, according to the UN's climate calculator. That is, the temperature in 2100 gets reduced to what it would otherwise be in 2096. All pain, no gain.
Even if every nation that has "obligations" under the UN's Kyoto Protocol on global warming also adopts and enforces it, it would cut warming a mere 7 percent below the "business as usual" level, an amount probably too small to measure with confidence.
Why would such drastic action on the part of America, Europe and Japan do so little to change the world? Because the older industrial nations are fast becoming bit players when it comes to global CO2 emissions. America's been pretty stagnant in the last decade -- while China's have been staggering.
In eight years, China's annual totals will be equal to what they emit now plus everything we emit. So if we stopped emitting completely, China completely counters our effort.
Add to that a simple fact which no cap-and-trade bill admits: That legislation would push even more of our industry into migrating to China, India and other nations that have no intention of reducing emissions by making energy more expensive.
Bottom line: This legislation won't lower global temperatures -- but merely make life more expensive. It'll force you to buy things you don't want, like much more expensive cars, and to use energy sources you'd normally bypass, like ethanol, solar and windmills. All have to be massively subsidized -- with your tax dollars -- to compete with today's mix of coal, gasoline and natural gas.
Patrick J. Michaels is Cato Institute senior fellow and a distinguished senior fellow at the School of Public Policy, George Mason University.
Bam's climate Rx: All pain, no gain
By PATRICK J. MICHAELS
The cap-and-trade bill that the House passed last summer aims to force Americans to reduce those dreaded carbon emissions by 83 percent in less than four decades -- to the same per-capita level as 1867. Yet, even under the Al Gore-approved climate-science models, the bill would do nothing to stop global warming.
The bill is 1,000-plus pages of rules, regulations, handouts, subsidies and whatever else House leaders deemed necessary. Not one of the 435 members read the whole monstrosity -- because the leadership dropped 300 new pages on their desks the night before they voted.
Yet the central point is clear enough: The bill simply drives up the price of fossil-fuel based energy so high that the nation will have to somehow get along with only 17 percent of the gasoline and fossil-fuel-powered electricity that it uses today.
Don't ask how much it will cost. No one really knows, since you can't put a price on something that has yet to be defined.
Last Tuesday, President Obama cited the BP blowout as reason for the Senate to pass its version of the House bill. But senators know that expensive emission reductions are profoundly unpopular. Congress members found this out last summer when protests erupted nationwide within 24 hours of the bill's passage. Polls also suggest that a vote for the warming bill (especially on top of a vote for the health-care bill) is not a good way to keep a job in Congress this November.
And, again, the bills (neither the House-like Kerry-Lieberman tome, nor the climate-change lite by Indiana's Sen. Richard Lugar) would do nothing measurable about climate change.
The median guess from the United Nations is that, if we do nothing to change our ways, the average world surface temperature will rise about 5 degrees Fahrenheit this century. (In fact, the trends in recent decades strongly suggest that this is an overestimate -- but let's accept it for the sake of the argument.)
Now, if only the United States does change its ways, by adopting something like the House bill, we'd prevent about two-tenths of a degree of that warming, according to the UN's climate calculator. That is, the temperature in 2100 gets reduced to what it would otherwise be in 2096. All pain, no gain.
Even if every nation that has "obligations" under the UN's Kyoto Protocol on global warming also adopts and enforces it, it would cut warming a mere 7 percent below the "business as usual" level, an amount probably too small to measure with confidence.
Why would such drastic action on the part of America, Europe and Japan do so little to change the world? Because the older industrial nations are fast becoming bit players when it comes to global CO2 emissions. America's been pretty stagnant in the last decade -- while China's have been staggering.
In eight years, China's annual totals will be equal to what they emit now plus everything we emit. So if we stopped emitting completely, China completely counters our effort.
Add to that a simple fact which no cap-and-trade bill admits: That legislation would push even more of our industry into migrating to China, India and other nations that have no intention of reducing emissions by making energy more expensive.
Bottom line: This legislation won't lower global temperatures -- but merely make life more expensive. It'll force you to buy things you don't want, like much more expensive cars, and to use energy sources you'd normally bypass, like ethanol, solar and windmills. All have to be massively subsidized -- with your tax dollars -- to compete with today's mix of coal, gasoline and natural gas.
Patrick J. Michaels is Cato Institute senior fellow and a distinguished senior fellow at the School of Public Policy, George Mason University.
Labels:
Al-Gore,
Al-Gore-lies,
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetoro,
Cap-and-tax,
cap-and-trade,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberals-Lie,
Stop-Marxism
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Al Gore: A Study in Hypocrisy
Al Gore has told us we must embrace a "carbon-neutral lifestyle." To do otherwise, he says, will result in a cataclysmic catastrophe. "Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb," said Gore in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. "We have just 10 years to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tailspin." Gore tells us to use compact fluorescent light bulbs, use a clothesline, drive a hybrid, use renewable energy, and to dramatically cut back on consumption. Think small, says Gore.
But what he does is something else. Until recently Gore and his wife Tipper lived in two mansions: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, TN and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. He also has a smaller one in Carthage. But hey, why would anyone expect a Hollywood liberal to practice what he preaches. Well, Big Al has really gone overboard now.
According to the L.A. Times, Big Al has added another mansion to his holdings. Click Here For LA Times Article. This one is in Montecito CA. It only cost $8,875,000. It sits on 1.5 acres and has a swimming pool, spa, fountains, six fireplaces, five bedrooms, and nine bathrooms. I am sure that the nine bathrooms will be put to good use since Big Al is full of you know what! Way to go Big Al. Think small. Use those florescent light bulbs for your lighting needs (Question: can you light all those spas, swimming pools, etc. with florescent lights?)
And to think this blow hard almost became President.
I wonder if they give a Nobel Prize for Hypocrisy. If so, Big Al should win it easily.
Written by Jim P.
But what he does is something else. Until recently Gore and his wife Tipper lived in two mansions: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, TN and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. He also has a smaller one in Carthage. But hey, why would anyone expect a Hollywood liberal to practice what he preaches. Well, Big Al has really gone overboard now.
According to the L.A. Times, Big Al has added another mansion to his holdings. Click Here For LA Times Article. This one is in Montecito CA. It only cost $8,875,000. It sits on 1.5 acres and has a swimming pool, spa, fountains, six fireplaces, five bedrooms, and nine bathrooms. I am sure that the nine bathrooms will be put to good use since Big Al is full of you know what! Way to go Big Al. Think small. Use those florescent light bulbs for your lighting needs (Question: can you light all those spas, swimming pools, etc. with florescent lights?)
And to think this blow hard almost became President.
I wonder if they give a Nobel Prize for Hypocrisy. If so, Big Al should win it easily.
Written by Jim P.
Labels:
Al-Gore,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Hypocrisy,
Jim,
Liberal-Hypocrisy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)