ACORN and Democrats Covered up the Fannie Freddie Scam

Weasels like AARP are the type of Marxist Companies that tell someone to buy a $500,000 home when they can only afford a $80,000 home. Marxist Left Wing explain that you take it, you are entitled to it, etc. So then an Adult (someone like Paul Ryan) comes along and explains that you can only afford an $80,000 home.

So then the Marxists make the Adult person out to be a racist or bad Guy or whatever. It is like when President Bush warned of the Housing Crisis (on Video to prove it) 17 times. President Bush was called a Racist and an idiot. So now we have a worse home crisis than even back in the depression. I don't see how Bush was Racist when probably more Whites are being destroyed by Housing Crisis than anyone else. Democrats caused this crisis on purpose.

Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam

ACORN Community Organizer in the White House

A great article below on Barry;s trip to London. Barry bragged as if he was "Common" that he has a huge entourage and tricked out jet. If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot. So all you White People, grow a backbone and fight back. It does not make you a racist if you vote out the worst and most racist POTUS of all time.


An Entourage Surpassing the Queen's

by Dale McFeatters
President Obama showed up at the G-20 summit in London with everything but the proverbial kitchen sink-although he did bring the White House chef and the kitchen staff.

The heads of government in London for the G-20 summit are discussing serious and weighty issues, which in time will be duly reported on, but right now the British press is entranced by the sheer size of President Obama's traveling entourage. And no wonder.

Obama arrived with 500 staff in tow, including 200 Secret Service agents a team of six doctors, the White House chef and kitchen staff with the President's own food and water.

And, according to the Evening Standard, he also came with "35 vehicles in all, four speech writers and 12 teleprompters." For sure, our president is not going to be at a loss for words.

The press duly reported on Air Force One and all its bells and whistles but also on the presence of the presidential helicopter, Marine One, and a fleet of identical decoys to ferry him from Stansted airport to central London.

Among all those vehicles is the presidential limousine, which one local paper mistakenly called Cadillac One, but is universally referred to as the Beast. The limo, reinforced with ceramic and titanium armor, carries a tear gas cannon, night vision devices and its own oxygen and is resistant to chemical and radiation attack. It is, marveled one reporter, a sort of mobile panic room. The Guardian called it "the ultimate in heavily armored transport."

The president is entitled to all the security, communications and support he feels necessary to do his job but surely, when we're trying to project a more restrained, humble image to the world, the president's huge retinue could be scaled back to something less than the triumphal march from "Aida."

Portion above by Dale McFeatters


But you have already read about this in your local rag, I mean newspaper. Oh no, you didn’t? Okay then, you saw it on CNN? No? You mean the Marxist MSM did not inform America about Barry Soetoro?

You and I may never see healthcare again the way it used to be, but Slave Owner Obama took six doctors with him for a 3 day visit to London – along with 494 other so-called essential staff. Can you imagine the cost to us as taxpayers? And only 50% of us actually pay taxes in this country with more People going bankrupt every day. Are you happy with the abuse of our money? Hell NO! This idiot Community Organizer in the White House, deserved to be charged with theft of government property at a bare minimum. He is a Chicago crook and is drastically changing America to make us a third world Country,

Hat Tip to Mr. I

Not Fit To Be Commander in Chief

Hey Liberals and Left Wing Marxists and Obama Supporter Nazis,

Here is another reason why B. Hussein Obama has GOT to go!

Just how economically illiterate, wait make that economically suicidal, do you have to be to launch the eye-wateringly expensive Obamacare program (not to mention the bailouts and the "stimulus" spending that's directed almost entirely to government workers—just what hard-pressed taxpayers need, more government workers to be kept wallowing in pork) in the midst of the biggest financial crisis America has seen since the 1930s? Just how does recklessly expanding America's debt to the point of near bankruptcy and raising taxes on the productive sector of the economy serve any useful purpose?

No wonder economist Arthur Laffer is predicting a double-dip recession. The recovery won't begin till Obama is out of office—and never let a liberal try to tell you otherwise.

How about further evidence that this was the presidential candidate who's spiritual advisor for 20 years, and the man who married he and his wife, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., is anti-semitic and claims that America supports terrorism, invited the 9/11 attack, invented the HIV virus as a means of genocide against African Americans, blames the Jews for the world's problems and seemingly enjoys the repeated rant of "God Damn America".

B. Hussein Obama is the president who was endorsed by Louis Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam, the New Black Panther Party and other anti-white and anti-semitic hate groups.

Is it anything less than a double standard and complete bigotry when Obama stereotypes with the phrase "typical white person", knowing that if Hillary Clinton, John McCain or any other non-African American recast the same phrase in the form of 'typical black person' they would themselves be cast a racist and their resignation demanded?

Democrats Brought About the Financial Crisis

As most Conservatives already knew, the Housing debacle was caused by Democrats. Well a fantastic Book is out with specific information that links this Housing Crisis right back to Boxcar Willie. We had suspected that Slick Willie sent Janet Rhino Reno out in the real world to attack banks to they would be forced to give bogus mortgages. No Tyrants are ready to take the blame.

Barney Frank, Henry Cisneros, Nancy Pelosi, ACORN, La Raza, Franklin Raines and James Johnson are all disgusting individuals involved in this Crisis. A side note is that these groups and Left Wing Marxists are all closely tied to Barack Hussein Obama.

We also see that another Obama Supporter, left Wing Marxist Tracy Morgan made some violent statements in front of thousands of People. The Left Wing Democrats have a proclivity for violence. Tracy Morgan made the statement that he would stab his son to death if he said he was gay. The Left Wing Marxists, Obama Supporters, are so tolerant? Vile, Anti-American, and ignorant is the best way to describe the Left Wing Marxists Obama Supporters.

This information below is a great post we saw online.

Book Exposes How Democrats Brought About the Financial Crisis

From the Great Rush Limbaugh

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Folks, there's a new book out, been brought to my attention. I just downloaded it, my iPad on I books. I'm gonna start reading it this afternoon. The book is entitled "Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon," and it's by Gretchen Morgenson (who is an economics writer/business writer to the New York Times) and noted financial analyst Joshua Rosner. And this book apparently is a cover-to-cover indictment of Wall Street and the Democrat Party, Fannie Mae and subprime mortgages. This book answers the question that the American people have: Who is responsible for this debacle?

The American people know somebody really screwed up, but they don't know who. This book provides the answer and in names. One of the big names mentioned is a guy named James Johnson, a huge Democrat Party power broker, facilitator, fundraiser. Barney Frank's name is mentioned. ACORN. La Raza. The Democrat establishment with unbreakable ties to Wall Street. Angelo Mozilo. This book apparently makes it plain that this economic disaster is a pure creation of the Democrat Party and crony capitalist associates on Wall Street. Not the Republican Party. Pure and simple, the Democrat Party. Despite the fact that the lead author is one of the business writers for the New York Times, Gretchen Morgenson.

[Walter Russell Mead] well-known Democrat has reviewed the book. He says that the Republican Party and the Tea Party have just acquired a new weapon of mass destruction (it has nothing to do with Weiner), and that if the deploy the weapon effectively in the next election cycle -- and Mead says it's a big if -- then they've got the biggest opportunity to move the country rightward since Ronald Reagan took the oath of office in 1981. And it is this book, that this book answers the question average Americans have: "Why is what's happening to me happening? Why is my home worthless? Why don't I have a job? Why can't I get a loan? Why is this economy such a mess?"

This book answers it, and answers it with the names of Democrats on Wall Street in the Obama administration: Bill Clinton, Barney Frank, Henry Cisneros, Nancy Pelosi, ACORN, La Raza -- and the big villain: A guy by the name of James Johnson, long one of the most important members of the Democrat establishment. He ran Mondull's campaign with Beckel. He chaired the search of John Kerry (who, by the way, served in Vietnam) for a vice president. He's the guy that settled on the noted anti-poverty warrior, John Edwards. Obama was so impressed with this James Johnson fellow that he reportedly asked him to lead Obama's search in 2008 for a VP, though he withdrew.

Johnson withdrew when word got out that he benefited from the disgraced and disgusting Angelo Mozilo's corrupt program of special mortgages for political people. [Mead] says this story as a killer app for the Republicans. It demonizes Democrats, it lends itself to attack ads, it divides Democrats between their Wall Street and union bases, combines Republican hate figures in ways calculated to unify the Republicans and heighten the intensity of the faithful. "The story illustrates everything the Tea Party thinks about the corrupt Washington establishment and the evils of big government. It demonstrates the limits on the ability of government programs to help the poor. It converts a complicated economic story into a simple morality play -- with Dems as the villain. It allows Republicans to capitalize on public fury at the country’s economic problems. It links the Democrats to Wall Street -- the one part of the private sector that the Republican base loathes. It exposes that mix of incompetence and arrogance that is the hallmark of the modern American liberal establishment and links this condescending cluelessness to the real problems of real American families. It links President Obama (through appointments, associations and friendships) with the worst elements of the Clinton legacy and it blunts some key Democratic talking points."

The title of the book is "Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon," and it's still happening. This little exercise here with Obama and coal is one little microcosm, one small little example. James Johnson, as I say, was an official of Fannie Mae -- and for compensation decisions made while he was a board member of United Health Care, one of the nation's biggest medical insurers. So I don't know if you ever heard the name James Johnson but he's one of these apparently huge, behind the scenes (not even so much behind the scenes), big-time Democrat Party power broker. But imagine a book that has the answers is that every American is asking: "Why in the world is this happening to our country?" The book has it in lay terms. You don't need a financial background to understand it, to decipher it -- and then the answers point straight to the Democrat Party and their liberal, crony capitalist buddies on Wall Street.

Time-out, another one. Fastest three hours in media. Speaking of books, Ann Coulter will be here in 45 minutes to discuss her new book, and it's a page-turner, too. It's about the "mob-ocracy" that is the left, the Democrat Party, and how mobs generally define Democrats today and serve as their prime mover.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: By the way, folks, the review of that book, Reckless Endangerment, was actually Walter Russell Mead. Mead reviewed the book and that's from which I was quoting, and it was Pat Caddell who sent Walter Russell Mead's review around. Just to be clear.

Suppose It Is Bogus?

Obama's “birth certificate” is pretty far down on my list of things that is wrong with Obama, but since he decided (through prodding by Donald Trump) to present his “birth certificate” to the public for viewing, it is the duty of the public to determine whether or not it is the real McCoy.

At first glance, it looks legitimate and it seems to be filled out fully, but is what is contained the real information or is it bogus?

Well, let's take a close look at what is contained in that Certificate of Live Birth. First off, the document has a file number of 61-106041 and a registration date of August 8, 1961. The day after Obama was born, a set of twins were born on August 5, 1961 (the Nordyke twins). They had file numbers of 61-106037 and 61-106038. Their birth was registered on August 11, i961 (3 days after Obama's). Since the file numbers run consecutively, how come Obama's file number is greater than the Nordyke twins who were born the day after Obama and were registered 3 days after Obama? How could that be?

Another questionable notation on the “birth certificate” is the entry of where his father was born. It states that he was born in Kenya, East Africa, but there was no country called Kenya in 1961. The country now known as Kenya, got its independence in 1963 (two years after Obama was born). In 1961, the place where Obama Sr. was born was known as the British East Africa Protectorate not Kenya. How could that be?

Another entry on that “birth certificate” that does not jibe is the name of the hospital that he claims he was born in. On the purported “birth certificate”, it states that the name of the hospital was Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, but there was no hospital by that name until 1978 when Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with the Kapi'olani Maternity Home and changed its name to Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital the name that appears on the real “birth certificate” presented by Obama. How could that be?

So instead of settling the matter of his birth once and for all and shutting up the “birthers”, it just muddied up the matter even more.

Are the people in charge of handling Obama's public relations and his personal affairs really incompetent and a throw back to the Keystone Kops or are they just arrogant about telling the truth?

A simple thing like a birth certificate, which most of us have, can, in the wrong hands, or by devious people, can cause multiple questions about the integrity of the person it's supposed to represent and who happens to be our president. If we can't trust him to give us a valid “birth certificate” can we trust him in the other things he has to tell us?

I'd like to see some courageous reporter or a news organization ask Obama or his senior staff if they would vouch for the “birth certificate” they presented to the public, and if they can't, why can't they?

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Chuck On The Right Side

The Marxist Bully and the Birth Certificate

Donald Trump continues his onslaught on Barry Soetoro. FINALLY someone is giving the proper Hardcore attack on the Community Organizer. Liberals are too ignorant, too scared or blinded by the Nazi MSM to question "why is this Anti-American Marxist Bully in the White House". Below is a very informative article by Seth Forman.


Donald Trump Scores an Important Victory... Over the Media
Written by By Seth Forman

Donald Trump is a shameless self-promoter. His prowess as a developer and businessman has been greatly exaggerated. He has crawled around in the muck and mire of what now passes for popular culture, and deserves at least some of the blame for tawdry's victory over grace in that sphere. He is an outsized egotist (about on a par with Obama) whose passion for self-congratulation is the only reliable thing we know about him. And that his future candidacy for president may soon be taken seriously owes to no one so much as it does Barack Obama, whose own candidacy seriously eroded the standards for presidential qualification.


But Trump has achieved something important. His decision to focus like a laser on Obama's failure to produce a birth certificate has highlighted the absolute corruption of the American media on the subject of Obama, and the dangers of power granted in the absence of an unaligned press.


Given that Obama's primary claim to the presidency has been his compelling life story -- his biracialism, his international upbringing, especially the time he spent in Muslim lands -- the media has shown shockingly little interest in several pieces of information about Obama's life which might legitimately concern voters. Nowhere in his biographies, for example, does Obama mention his 1981 trip to Pakistan, where he stayed with influential political leaders from that country at a time when a State Department advisory warned U.S. citizens against travel to Pakistan. There has also been a strange disinterest in Obama's 2006 trip to Kenya where, as a sitting U.S. senator, Obama criticized the incumbent government (a U.S. ally) and barnstormed with a Marxist candidate he supported. So too, there has been nary a peep among media elites over Obama's funding of the radical "education" work of bomb thrower Bill Ayers, or his own work on behalf of the activist group ACORN, the now defunct largest purveyor of voter registration fraud in American history (and, apparently, an enabler of under aged prostitution.).


One of the functions of the media is to protect the public from fraudulent statements made by public figures. The unwillingness of the media to fulfill this role in the case of Obama has led to significant, and probably needless, public tension. Obama's resistance to releasing the long version of his birth certificate, has served not only to raise legitimate speculation about the circumstances surrounding his birth, but to give fodder to anti-Obama extremists.


Gail Collins, the New York Times's most reliably uninteresting liberal attack dog, questioned Trump's sanity just for raising the birth certificate issue. But would she say the same about famed black Vanderbilt University Law Professor and Obama supporter Carol Swain? Swain has said "I think that by not releasing it [the full birth certificate], it makes people much more passionately opposed to the president. Moreover, for a president who was elected on the basis of his personal background, it is troubling that Obama himself would want to withhold such basic information."


The media's curiosity about the background of those running for national office seemed to know no bounds when it came to George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard or the sexual behavior of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's daughter. But during and since the 2008 campaign a virtual wall of silence has been constructed around Obama.


This has important implications for the country. Questions about Obama's family and his relationship to Islam, for example, and hence his world view, remain subjects of speculation. Former CIA officer Larry Johnson, for example, believes that the full birth record from the State of Hawaii was probably amended in 1968 to show Obama was adopted by his step father, the Indonesian Muslim Lolo Soetoro, that he became formally known for a time as "Barry Soetoro," and may even have his religion listed as Muslim. This would completely change what Obama has said about his past and represent a public fraud of a very significant magnitude.


At the very least the full record might help explain Obama's strange discomfort with exercising American power against radical Muslim regimes in Libya and elsewhere, where he has farmed out the defense of American interests to the United Nations, and his insistence on "dialogue" with rogue Muslim regimes in Syria and Iran. All of this while touting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Al Qaeda associated Muslim opposition groups in Libya as democracy craving freedom fighters.


Some of the missing details of Obama's life are doubtlessly trivial. Obama probably has benign explanations for not providing more information about them. Even Trump admits that the evidence strongly suggests Obama was born in Hawaii and is an American citizen. But that Obama has not yet released this information, and that the media refuses to criticize him for not doing so, is a testament not to the insanity of the "birthers," but to Obama's penchant for secrecy, and the dangerous amount of latitude the media has been willing to cede him.

Seth Forman is author of American Obsession: Race and Conflict in the Age of Obama (forthcoming, Booklocker), and blogs at www.mrformansplanet.com

Sotero's Civilian National Security FARCE

Here was an article that was from July, 2008.
Obviously not enough people read this and voted for the Politically Correct choice, the appeaser, B. Hussein Obama. Is he promoting a civilian force to try and take over the Country in 2012? Obama did side with the Dictator in Honduras, did he not?
Again the Liberal Fringe Media lets Barry go unchecked. They all have Blood on their Hands as well as the Democrat Party.

This article below was at the great Americanthinker.com .
Obama's Civilian National Security Force
By Lee Cary

Barack Obama's recent words to promote his image as Community Organizer in Chief were not about forming a paramilitary force of volunteer brown shirts. They were about turning America into one, giant, community organizer's sandbox at enormous cost to taxpayers.

Senator Obama was nearly 17 minutes into his July 2 speech (yet another one where naming Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was required) in Colorado Springs, Colorado when he deviated from his pre-released script and performed without the teleprompter net saying,

"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." (emphasis added)

The immediate context for that amazing statement was a preview of parts of his plan to vastly expand community service opportunities for Americans of nearly all ages. He said,

"People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve."

The range of his community service initiatives was outlined in an earlier American Thinker article. In his campaign document entitled "The Blueprint for Change: Barack Obama's Plan For America," Obama's "Service" section runs a close second to "Education" in complexity. But, with his Colorado Springs' statement, it grabbed first place in its projected costs to taxpayers. Obama did the cost projection himself.

He plans to double the Peace Corps' budget by 2011, and expand AmeriCorps, USA Freedom Corps, VISTA, YouthBuild Program, and the Senior Corps. Plus, he proposes to form a Classroom Corps, Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, Veterans Corps, Homeland Security Corps, Global Energy Corps, and a Green Jobs Corps. Here a corps - there a corps - everywhere a corps corps.

So it made sense in Colorado Springs when he said his call to community service "will be a central cause of my presidency." He couldn't be clearer in signaling his intentions, including a Social Investment Fund Network to link local non-profits with the federal government.

The entire plan is breathtaking in its scope. But it does not, as at least one internet writer has suggested, portend a "giant police force." It would be easier to rebut if it did. As it is, it's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams.

Senator Obama aims to tap into the already active volunteerism of millions of Americans and recruit them to become cogs in a gigantic government machine grinding out his social re-engineering agenda. It's Orwellian-like, with a novice social activist's mentality at the helm. In his speech he said,

"Now I know what the cynics will say. I've heard from them all my life."

Has he? Well, given his absence of noteworthy community organizational achievements, perhaps he might have done more listening to the "cynics" for constructive criticism.

It seems clear that he meant to say, in effect, that the security of the nation is as dependent on its unarmed community service providers as it is on its armed military personnel. Even the nomenclature "corps," as in Peace Corps, carries a martial connotation as does the name, Salvation Army. His point: national security begins with civilians. It's a message like the one America's home front heard throughout World War II. Except in his case, he means to marshal volunteers for social service and economic equality while saving the environment.

"Because the future of our nation depends on the soldier at Fort Carson, but is also depends on the teacher in East LA, the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans..."

That is, of course, true. But ultimate national security requires someone to carry, and, if necessary, discharge a deadly weapon with intent to kill. This is something teachers, nurses and after-school workers are typically unaccustomed to doing as part of their service obligations.

Voters haven't paid much attention to his "Service" plan because the old news media has ignored it. That will likely continue, even though Obama attached an approximate price tag to it in Colorado Springs. When Obama said that the "civilian national security force" would be just as "well-funded" as the Armed Forces, he stepped squarely into the giant sandbox and played with the big numbers. As the late Carl Sagan said, "billions and billions" of dollars. Here's how.

The FY 2008 Department of Defense (DoD) budget is about $482 billion. Obama has announced his intentions to cut "tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending," including $9 billion per month spent in Iraq and expenditures for the missile defense system, while increasing the force size of the Army and Marine Corps.

Let's imagine "tens of billions" in cuts eventually adds up to a whopping $150 billion. That would be a near one-third cut in defense spending, taking the DoD budget down to $332 billion. Even in such an extreme case of DoD budget reduction, for his "civilian national security force" to be "just as well-funded" would mean funding his community service initiatives at an equivalent $332 billion.

Consequently, another $332 billion in addition to the Pentagon's reduced budget of $332 billion equals a net increase of $182 billion in the annual federal budget, assuming we sponge-up the already existing expenditures for the relatively meager, by comparison, existing service programs he plans to expand. That's $182,000,000,000 in new federal monies, and that means higher taxes.

In his entire life, Senator Obama has never managed an organization larger than a Senate staff, or that of a law school publication. And, he's never operated a for-profit business or been responsible for any profit center within one. So, while words matter to Senator Obama, it's not clear if math means anything to him at all.


If any supporters of Obama do not believe the truth, listen below with your own set of ears.