Showing posts with label Bill-Ayers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill-Ayers. Show all posts
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Barry Soetoro Obama and Bill Ayers Together Against America
Obama Was Recruited and Trained by Communist Terror Bomber Bill Ayers. Barry Soetoro Obama and Bill Ayers worked on many projects together including the Obama Anti-American Books.
Bill Ayers and his disgusting wife Bernadine Dohrn had a plan to Kill 25 Million Americans. The Weather Underground Organization is a Terrorist Group and America re-elected, Hussein Obama a close ally of this Group?
Democrats get exactly what they deserve with the re-election of this Marxist. However it is a shame the rest of us have to pay the consequence of the choice of racist Liberals.
Labels:
Allen-Hulton,
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetoro,
Bernadine-Dohrn,
Bill-Ayers,
Jerome-Corsi,
John-Murtagh,
Michelle-Obama,
Racist-Michelle-Obama,
The-Weather-Underground-Organization
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Obama is a "Card-Carrying" Marxist
It’s been four years and the mainstream media still refuses to address the fact that Barack Obama is a Marxist. In fact using that word gets you branded as a crazy (guilty but not on this issue) and someone who uses divisive tone.
Some who brand Obama Marxist use as their evidence his policies such as the takeover of the domestic auto business, Obamacare, "redistribution of income" etc. Others examine his associations, from Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers to people he hired such as Van Jones and Rev. Jim Wallis. While valid, the examples above are purely circumstantial.
I use a simpler and more direct method of proving my case. When the President was running for the Illinois State Senate, not only did he run with the endorsement of a local socialist organization, but also he signed a contract with one of them, The New Party. The party was a Marxist Political coalition. This was not guilt by association thing. Senator Obama sought out their nomination. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement which required that he sign a contract with the group.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the "Community Organizing" group ACORN. The party's Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
The New Party's modus operandi included the political strategy of "electoral fusion," where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates' platforms. (Fusion of this type is permitted in seven states -- Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont -- but is common only in New York.)
Though Illinois was not one of the states that permitted electoral fusion, in 1995 Barack Obama nonetheless sought the New Party's endorsement for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers. By 1996, Obama had become a member of the New Party. Who says so? Well the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party and the New Party Said so, at least back then they did:
New Ground 42 (New Ground is the Official Newsletter of the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party) September October 1995. Obama signed a contract promising an visible and open relationship with the Marxist New Party:
About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions.
The NP's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP. The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama. What is the Proof that Obama actually signed the contract? He got the endorsement.
New Ground 46 May-June 1996 DSA Endorsement:
Three out of four candidates endorsed by Chicago DSA in the March primary election won. Only Willie Delgado lost in his effort to win nomination for 3rd General Assembly District; he received only 43% of the vote. Danny Davis walked away with the nomination for the 7th Congressional District; he also had no trouble defeating two candidates for 29th Ward Democratic Committeeman. Patricia Martin's race for Judge of the Circuit Court (7th Subcircuit) was more of a cliffhanger as she won by only 3%. She will have no opposition in November's General Election. Barack Obama won nomination to the Illinois Senate with no opposition. He will have no opposition in November. The 49th Ward non-binding referendum in support of the Jobs and Living Wage Ordinance won with 3,164 votes against 576 "no" votes and 1,140 "abstentions".
New Ground 47 July August 1: New Party Endorsement:
Secondly, the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration. The lone loser was Willie Delgado, in the 3rd Illinois House District. Although Delgado received 45% of the vote, he lost by only 800 votes. Delgado commented that it was due to the NP volunteers that he carried the 32nd Ward. Delgado emphasized that he will remain a visible community activist in Humbolt Park. He will conduct four Immigration workshops and encouraged NP activists to get involved.
New Ground 45 March - April, 1996 Obama is a panelist at Town Hall meeting of Chicago Democratic Socialist Party, the University of Chicago Democratic Socialist of America, and The University Democrats. Obama calls for redistribution of Income:
A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America By Bob Roman Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25 in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled "Employment and Survival in Urban America", the meeting was sponsored by the U of C DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats. The panelists were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago's 4th Ward; Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; Professor William Julius Wilson, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of DSA's National Political Committee.... .... Now the issue is again coming to the front, but he wished the issue was on the Democratic agenda not just on Buchanan's.
One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama's campaign is "what does it take to create productive communities", not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.
The first is "human capital development". By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a "workforce preparation strategy". Public education requires equality in funding. It's not that money is the only solution to public education's problems but it's a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it's also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, childcare and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the "social wage" approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By "workforce preparation strategy", Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.
The state government can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts..... New Ground 69 March-April 2000 Endorsement For Congress:
For Congressman of the 1st Congressional District, the Executive Committee was faced with two very good candidates. As we are not making endorsements but merely recommendations, we felt no conflict in recommending both Bobby Rush and Barak Obama.... Barak Obama is serving only his second term in the Illinois State Senate so he might be fairly charged with ambition, but the same might have be said of Bobby Rush when he ran against Congressman Charles Hayes. Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy. Need a different source? How about Progressive Populist November 1996?
New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.
Or Columbus Free Press? (The New Party's Newsletter): The first NP member heads to Congress, as Danny Davis wins an overwhelming 85% victory yesterday (he got a higher percentage of the vote in that district than the President). NP member and State Senate candidate Barack Obama won uncontested. Here's another little bit of history, not only was ACORN involved with the New Party but so was the SEIU (SEIU 880 was itself an ACORN offshoot). The fact that Obama received the New Party’s endorsement in his first run for office cannot be dismissed as insignificant. On the contrary, Obama’s ties to the New Party and the New Party’s backers at ACORN and the SEIU are long-standing, substantial, and reveal a great deal about his personal political allegiances.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Some who brand Obama Marxist use as their evidence his policies such as the takeover of the domestic auto business, Obamacare, "redistribution of income" etc. Others examine his associations, from Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers to people he hired such as Van Jones and Rev. Jim Wallis. While valid, the examples above are purely circumstantial.
I use a simpler and more direct method of proving my case. When the President was running for the Illinois State Senate, not only did he run with the endorsement of a local socialist organization, but also he signed a contract with one of them, The New Party. The party was a Marxist Political coalition. This was not guilt by association thing. Senator Obama sought out their nomination. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement which required that he sign a contract with the group.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the "Community Organizing" group ACORN. The party's Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
The New Party's modus operandi included the political strategy of "electoral fusion," where it would nominate, for various political offices, candidates from other parties (usually Democrats), thereby enabling each of those candidates to occupy more than one ballot line in the voting booth. By so doing, the New Party often was able to influence candidates' platforms. (Fusion of this type is permitted in seven states -- Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont -- but is common only in New York.)
Though Illinois was not one of the states that permitted electoral fusion, in 1995 Barack Obama nonetheless sought the New Party's endorsement for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers. By 1996, Obama had become a member of the New Party. Who says so? Well the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party and the New Party Said so, at least back then they did:
New Ground 42 (New Ground is the Official Newsletter of the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party) September October 1995. Obama signed a contract promising an visible and open relationship with the Marxist New Party:
About 50 activists attended the Chicago New Party membership meeting in July. The purpose of the meeting was to update members on local activities and to hear appeals for NP support from four potential political candidates. The NP is being very active in organization building and politics. There are 300 members in Chicago. In order to build an organizational and financial base the NP is sponsoring house parties. Locally it has been successful both fiscally and in building a grassroots base. Nationwide it has resulted in 1000 people committed to monthly contributions.
The NP's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP. The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama. What is the Proof that Obama actually signed the contract? He got the endorsement.
New Ground 46 May-June 1996 DSA Endorsement:
Three out of four candidates endorsed by Chicago DSA in the March primary election won. Only Willie Delgado lost in his effort to win nomination for 3rd General Assembly District; he received only 43% of the vote. Danny Davis walked away with the nomination for the 7th Congressional District; he also had no trouble defeating two candidates for 29th Ward Democratic Committeeman. Patricia Martin's race for Judge of the Circuit Court (7th Subcircuit) was more of a cliffhanger as she won by only 3%. She will have no opposition in November's General Election. Barack Obama won nomination to the Illinois Senate with no opposition. He will have no opposition in November. The 49th Ward non-binding referendum in support of the Jobs and Living Wage Ordinance won with 3,164 votes against 576 "no" votes and 1,140 "abstentions".
New Ground 47 July August 1: New Party Endorsement:
Secondly, the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration. The lone loser was Willie Delgado, in the 3rd Illinois House District. Although Delgado received 45% of the vote, he lost by only 800 votes. Delgado commented that it was due to the NP volunteers that he carried the 32nd Ward. Delgado emphasized that he will remain a visible community activist in Humbolt Park. He will conduct four Immigration workshops and encouraged NP activists to get involved.
New Ground 45 March - April, 1996 Obama is a panelist at Town Hall meeting of Chicago Democratic Socialist Party, the University of Chicago Democratic Socialist of America, and The University Democrats. Obama calls for redistribution of Income:
A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America By Bob Roman Over three hundred people attended the first of two Town Meetings on Economic Insecurity on February 25 in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago. Entitled "Employment and Survival in Urban America", the meeting was sponsored by the U of C DSA Youth Section, Chicago DSA and University Democrats. The panelists were Toni Preckwinkle, Alderman of Chicago's 4th Ward; Barack Obama, candidate for the 13th Illinois Senate District; Professor William Julius Wilson, Center for the Study of Urban Inequality at the University of Chicago; Professor Michael Dawson, University of Chicago; and Professor Joseph Schwartz, Temple University and a member of DSA's National Political Committee.... .... Now the issue is again coming to the front, but he wished the issue was on the Democratic agenda not just on Buchanan's.
One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama's campaign is "what does it take to create productive communities", not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left. He felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.
The first is "human capital development". By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a "workforce preparation strategy". Public education requires equality in funding. It's not that money is the only solution to public education's problems but it's a start toward a solution. The current proposals for welfare reform are intended to eliminate welfare but it's also true that the status quo is not tenable. A true welfare system would provide for medical care, childcare and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the "social wage" approach used by many social democratic labor parties. By "workforce preparation strategy", Barack Obama simply meant a coordinated, purposeful program of job training instead of the ad hoc, fragmented approach used by the State of Illinois today.
The state government can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts..... New Ground 69 March-April 2000 Endorsement For Congress:
For Congressman of the 1st Congressional District, the Executive Committee was faced with two very good candidates. As we are not making endorsements but merely recommendations, we felt no conflict in recommending both Bobby Rush and Barak Obama.... Barak Obama is serving only his second term in the Illinois State Senate so he might be fairly charged with ambition, but the same might have be said of Bobby Rush when he ran against Congressman Charles Hayes. Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy. Need a different source? How about Progressive Populist November 1996?
New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.
Or Columbus Free Press? (The New Party's Newsletter): The first NP member heads to Congress, as Danny Davis wins an overwhelming 85% victory yesterday (he got a higher percentage of the vote in that district than the President). NP member and State Senate candidate Barack Obama won uncontested. Here's another little bit of history, not only was ACORN involved with the New Party but so was the SEIU (SEIU 880 was itself an ACORN offshoot). The fact that Obama received the New Party’s endorsement in his first run for office cannot be dismissed as insignificant. On the contrary, Obama’s ties to the New Party and the New Party’s backers at ACORN and the SEIU are long-standing, substantial, and reveal a great deal about his personal political allegiances.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
ACORN,
Bill-Ayers,
Community-Organizing,
dirty-Senator,
Frank-Marshall-Davis,
Illinois-Senate,
Maoists,
Marxist,
Obamacare,
redistribution-of-income,
socialist-organization,
Trotskyists,
Van-Jones
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Marco Rubio Verbally Beats Down Democrats
Sen. Rubio: "Save the Whole House or It Will All Burn Down"
Many People are asking if we can clone this Guy, Senator Marco Rubio. Finally we get someone with common sense, to ask Where Heck is That Damn Budget!!! Two and one half years and Barry Hussein does not produce a Budget. Why is this guy in Office??? Listen to this Lurch Phony, John Kerry try and step up to the plate. He is a sack of garbage who trashes our Veterans and then says WE need to pay more taxes. All the while the solution for sicko Kerry is dodging any taxes that he can.
The Democrats and anyone (Semi Colon Powell) who supported this Guy should be taxed to no end! These Obama supporters have to know by now the damage being done and they are to blame.
Hat Tip to Neil

Labels:
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetero,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Lie,
Marco-Rubio,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
No Tyrants in the White House Again
We hear many people criticize the Republican Candidates. So Rick Perry had a Christian gathering. If Obama had a Muslim gathering would the lowlife main stream media say anything? So Rick perry is a Christian. Is that worse than being a member in the Barack Husein Obama religion with Rev Wright? The great article below is by Ralph Alter. There should be no doubts as to who needs to get the boot from the White House. Let's just say the Marxist Guys needs to go! No tyrants in the White House anymore!
Obama vs. Perry in a nutshell
Written by Ralph Alter
Mark Hemingway at the Weekly Standard uncovered a quote from Texas Governor, Rick Perry, that distills the essence of the consistent, conservative approach that forms the basis for his efficient management of our most successful state:
Government isn't difficult in theory...Don't spend all the money, keep taxes low, have a fair and predictable regulatory climate, keep frivolous lawsuits to a minimum, and fund an accountable education system so that you have a skilled work force available. Then get the hell out of the way and let the private sector do what the private sector does best.
Under Barely the President, we have seen our federal government spend all the current available money and have dipped into the pockets of our children and grandchildren for more. Regulatory budgets in Washington have grown 16% since 2008, topping $54 billion while employment at federal regulatory agencies has climbed 13% under B.O. to 281,000. Obama has imposed more than 75 new major regulatory rules since taking office, adding 18% to the number of pages in the Federal Register and cost the private sector more than $40 billion according to the Heritage Foundation. More than 4,200 new regulations are in the works as well. Incredibly, the genuises in the Obama administration are now proposing a federal "Department of Jobs."
Now the Campaigner-in-Chief is spending an additional $100 million of our money on a bus tour to stump for more Keynesian bloat. Even Jon Stewart sees through the canard that the Obama Under the Bus tour represents B.O. performing official government business.
Rick Perry's succinct prescription for successfully managing government starkly contrasts with B.O. Theory:
Spend all the money. Raise taxes. Impose a hostile and punitive regulatory bureaucracy upon the private sector. Unleash the lawyers and turn the education system over to union hacks. Nationalize failing business models and invent crony socialism.
It looks like we really have a clear choice.
Written by Ralph Alter, He is a regular contributor to American Thinker (americanthinker.com)
Obama vs. Perry in a nutshell
Written by Ralph Alter
Mark Hemingway at the Weekly Standard uncovered a quote from Texas Governor, Rick Perry, that distills the essence of the consistent, conservative approach that forms the basis for his efficient management of our most successful state:
Government isn't difficult in theory...Don't spend all the money, keep taxes low, have a fair and predictable regulatory climate, keep frivolous lawsuits to a minimum, and fund an accountable education system so that you have a skilled work force available. Then get the hell out of the way and let the private sector do what the private sector does best.
Under Barely the President, we have seen our federal government spend all the current available money and have dipped into the pockets of our children and grandchildren for more. Regulatory budgets in Washington have grown 16% since 2008, topping $54 billion while employment at federal regulatory agencies has climbed 13% under B.O. to 281,000. Obama has imposed more than 75 new major regulatory rules since taking office, adding 18% to the number of pages in the Federal Register and cost the private sector more than $40 billion according to the Heritage Foundation. More than 4,200 new regulations are in the works as well. Incredibly, the genuises in the Obama administration are now proposing a federal "Department of Jobs."
Now the Campaigner-in-Chief is spending an additional $100 million of our money on a bus tour to stump for more Keynesian bloat. Even Jon Stewart sees through the canard that the Obama Under the Bus tour represents B.O. performing official government business.
Rick Perry's succinct prescription for successfully managing government starkly contrasts with B.O. Theory:
Spend all the money. Raise taxes. Impose a hostile and punitive regulatory bureaucracy upon the private sector. Unleash the lawyers and turn the education system over to union hacks. Nationalize failing business models and invent crony socialism.
It looks like we really have a clear choice.
Written by Ralph Alter, He is a regular contributor to American Thinker (americanthinker.com)
Labels:
Barry-Soetero,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Hate-USA,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Pelosi,
No-tyrants,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Rick-Perry,
Texas-Conservatives
Sunday, August 14, 2011
Rick Perry For President - No More Community Organizers
Rick Perry: Time to Get America Working Again
Relating to the official presidential announcement, Rick Perry has launched a new, two minute campaign video.
The governor of the great State of Texas is “America’s jobs governor,” and “conservative to the core,” and he is not an incompetent Community Organizer who downgrades America. Rick Perry is someone with “proven executive leadership.” Rick Perry does not run away from social issues but is rooted in concerns about jobs and the economy. America is falling apart with the current ACORN Leadership. We do not need a Rev. Wright Protegee, we need a Fight and a Leader.
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
MORT's Meanderings
Finally. A birth certificate we can believe in.
Thanks to technological repairs and enhancements to the often-maligned but, most spectacular scientific achievement, the Hubble Space Telescope, we have now been provided with one of its most unique revelations.
Peering through galaxies of gaseous space dust, beeelyuns and beeelyuns of stars into that astro-phenomenon, the Milky Way itself, space watchers at the Obama Space Watching Laboratory high atop Mt.Hussein on the island of KillerWhale-ia, Hawaii, have recently made an astounding discovery. You ain't not hardly gonna believe this one.
They've been able to isolate and identify an item that had been buried within all that space flotsam and obscured by the aforementioned gaseous space dust for, by their best estimate, nearly fifty years. What wuz it, you axx? None other than the genuine article: Bayrock Forshame Obammer's birth certificate. No kiddin' - this is it; signed by Moe Hammid, himself and counter-signed by Al Sharpton, Louie Ferrycan and the very Reverend Always Wright. It has since been validated by Snopes, The Huffington Post, the Secretary of Homeland Security, Nancy Pelosi and Casey Anthony. Now, is this the authentic document, or what?
President Obama was informed of the discovery and received the news with no outward change in his cool demeanor. Later in the day, he released a statement through Al Jazeera, promising to study the information and make an announcement regarding his official position a soon as he receives the findings of the Select Commission of sex bi-partisan members of Congress whom he personally chose to investigate the authenticity of this document.
What could be more fair than that?
There is every expectation among both the scientific and academic communities, that he will validate the document and be the first to release the information in what he has always claimed, is the most fully-transparent Administration in our nation's history. This is nothing more than he promised in each one of his beelyuns and beelyuns of campaign speeches.
Before being quoted on any of the above however, I want to check something in my dictionary. I've always confused the terms, 'Telescope' with 'Proctoscope'. And, I do want to be technically correct; it's a thing with me.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
Labels:
Bill-Ayers,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Mort-Kuff,
MORTs-Meanderings,
Proud-Infidels,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans,
WWII
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Suppose It Is Bogus?
Obama's “birth certificate” is pretty far down on my list of things that is wrong with Obama, but since he decided (through prodding by Donald Trump) to present his “birth certificate” to the public for viewing, it is the duty of the public to determine whether or not it is the real McCoy.
At first glance, it looks legitimate and it seems to be filled out fully, but is what is contained the real information or is it bogus?
Well, let's take a close look at what is contained in that Certificate of Live Birth. First off, the document has a file number of 61-106041 and a registration date of August 8, 1961. The day after Obama was born, a set of twins were born on August 5, 1961 (the Nordyke twins). They had file numbers of 61-106037 and 61-106038. Their birth was registered on August 11, i961 (3 days after Obama's). Since the file numbers run consecutively, how come Obama's file number is greater than the Nordyke twins who were born the day after Obama and were registered 3 days after Obama? How could that be?
Another questionable notation on the “birth certificate” is the entry of where his father was born. It states that he was born in Kenya, East Africa, but there was no country called Kenya in 1961. The country now known as Kenya, got its independence in 1963 (two years after Obama was born). In 1961, the place where Obama Sr. was born was known as the British East Africa Protectorate not Kenya. How could that be?
Another entry on that “birth certificate” that does not jibe is the name of the hospital that he claims he was born in. On the purported “birth certificate”, it states that the name of the hospital was Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, but there was no hospital by that name until 1978 when Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with the Kapi'olani Maternity Home and changed its name to Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital the name that appears on the real “birth certificate” presented by Obama. How could that be?
So instead of settling the matter of his birth once and for all and shutting up the “birthers”, it just muddied up the matter even more.
Are the people in charge of handling Obama's public relations and his personal affairs really incompetent and a throw back to the Keystone Kops or are they just arrogant about telling the truth?
A simple thing like a birth certificate, which most of us have, can, in the wrong hands, or by devious people, can cause multiple questions about the integrity of the person it's supposed to represent and who happens to be our president. If we can't trust him to give us a valid “birth certificate” can we trust him in the other things he has to tell us?
I'd like to see some courageous reporter or a news organization ask Obama or his senior staff if they would vouch for the “birth certificate” they presented to the public, and if they can't, why can't they?
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Chuck On The Right Side
At first glance, it looks legitimate and it seems to be filled out fully, but is what is contained the real information or is it bogus?
Well, let's take a close look at what is contained in that Certificate of Live Birth. First off, the document has a file number of 61-106041 and a registration date of August 8, 1961. The day after Obama was born, a set of twins were born on August 5, 1961 (the Nordyke twins). They had file numbers of 61-106037 and 61-106038. Their birth was registered on August 11, i961 (3 days after Obama's). Since the file numbers run consecutively, how come Obama's file number is greater than the Nordyke twins who were born the day after Obama and were registered 3 days after Obama? How could that be?
Another questionable notation on the “birth certificate” is the entry of where his father was born. It states that he was born in Kenya, East Africa, but there was no country called Kenya in 1961. The country now known as Kenya, got its independence in 1963 (two years after Obama was born). In 1961, the place where Obama Sr. was born was known as the British East Africa Protectorate not Kenya. How could that be?
Another entry on that “birth certificate” that does not jibe is the name of the hospital that he claims he was born in. On the purported “birth certificate”, it states that the name of the hospital was Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, but there was no hospital by that name until 1978 when Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with the Kapi'olani Maternity Home and changed its name to Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital the name that appears on the real “birth certificate” presented by Obama. How could that be?
So instead of settling the matter of his birth once and for all and shutting up the “birthers”, it just muddied up the matter even more.
Are the people in charge of handling Obama's public relations and his personal affairs really incompetent and a throw back to the Keystone Kops or are they just arrogant about telling the truth?
A simple thing like a birth certificate, which most of us have, can, in the wrong hands, or by devious people, can cause multiple questions about the integrity of the person it's supposed to represent and who happens to be our president. If we can't trust him to give us a valid “birth certificate” can we trust him in the other things he has to tell us?
I'd like to see some courageous reporter or a news organization ask Obama or his senior staff if they would vouch for the “birth certificate” they presented to the public, and if they can't, why can't they?
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Bill-Ayers,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-Lies,
Facist,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Holder,
Fringe-Media,
Racist-Liberals,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Ronald-Reagan,
Stop-Marxism
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Babies Born Alive During Abortion Don't Survive BHO
After our Memorial Day break we want to report on the Nazi MSM in South Florida again. The MSM in this Country is just an illegitimate arm of the Community Organizer Leader. How many more times do we have to hear why a certain Republican can't be President over a small or past mistake? When will Barry Soetoro be sent packing for ACORN, Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Racist "Common" Rapper, Khalidi, Odinga or voting to leave a baby in a utility closet to die alone!
Yes Oprah and you despicable Obama supporters, this is a man full of hate for America, Israel and England. Also he has added more to the National Debt, in two years, than the previous 43 Presidents combined! Yet these Anti-American MSM knuckleheads want him reelected.

We have another response from Chuck On The Right Side to the local Newspaper Rag in South Florida.
Dear Editor:
In response to Sidney Shapiro's Saturday Forum column in the Sun-Sentinel (May 28), I think he should stop drinking the Obama Kool-Aid.
He proclaims that Obama's speech on the Middle East was "brilliant rhetoric", but he didn't ask the American people or the Israeli's if they concurred with that assessment. All polls said it was looked upon as a disaster.
The old expression, "he cleaned his clock", should be attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu as he gave our inexperienced, clueless president a history lesson on the Middle East. As an American, I was embarrassed for our country and was made more sympathetic to the plight of our Israeli friends. Sidney should get rid of his rose-colored glasses and face reality. Idol worship is now passe.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Yes Oprah and you despicable Obama supporters, this is a man full of hate for America, Israel and England. Also he has added more to the National Debt, in two years, than the previous 43 Presidents combined! Yet these Anti-American MSM knuckleheads want him reelected.

We have another response from Chuck On The Right Side to the local Newspaper Rag in South Florida.
Dear Editor:
In response to Sidney Shapiro's Saturday Forum column in the Sun-Sentinel (May 28), I think he should stop drinking the Obama Kool-Aid.
He proclaims that Obama's speech on the Middle East was "brilliant rhetoric", but he didn't ask the American people or the Israeli's if they concurred with that assessment. All polls said it was looked upon as a disaster.
The old expression, "he cleaned his clock", should be attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu as he gave our inexperienced, clueless president a history lesson on the Middle East. As an American, I was embarrassed for our country and was made more sympathetic to the plight of our Israeli friends. Sidney should get rid of his rose-colored glasses and face reality. Idol worship is now passe.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Bill-Ayers,
Democrat-Lies,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Holder,
Liberals-Lie,
MSM-Frauds,
Nazi-Democrat,
Nazi-MSM,
Obama-ACORN,
Obamacare,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Racist-Sotomayor,
stop-sharia-law
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Letter from Porter Stansberry to BHO
Dear Mr. President,
Welcome to the ashbin of society.
With the speech you gave last week, you have firmly and permanently put yourself in the same garbage bag as all the other communists and socialists of the 20th century.
Your speech sounded like the faint echo of a speech Lenin gave in an icy square in Moscow 100 years ago.
The promises you made, Mr. President, about the government giving people things they can't provide for themselves – a better income, reliable health care, an advanced education, cheaper mortgages, a "shiny, happy" life – have been made time and time again… sometimes by speakers even better than you.
And they have always been lies.
While the government can demand obedience (and taxes), it can't mandate dedication, creativity, or innovation. The fact is, the government itself is nothing more (or less) than the organized ambitions of the people.
Promising something to the people that they don't already have is a logical absurdity. And therein lies the timeless flaw of all collectivist theory: Governments cannot deliver benefits to the people that the people cannot deliver to themselves.
To demonstrate this truth, consider this example… Governments cannot simply mandate higher tax revenue. Any substantial increase to tax rates will reduce total collections, an economic phenomenon known as the "Laffer Curve."
This has been proven countless times in our country and many others. Any sensible person will immediately understand why. Taxes are a disincentive. The higher the marginal rate of tax, the more powerful its impact.
That's why, over many decades (and many different tax structures), U.S. tax revenues have been remarkably stable at around 20% of GDP. That's why, as you surely know, Mr. President, changing the tax code will not result in increased tax revenue.
Taxing only the rich simply doesn't work. It never has. And it never will. To increase the government's revenues, we must first increase the size of the economy. The government cannot tax what the economy doesn't produce.
In another time, most Americans might have simply ignored your speech as the ignorant remarks of yet another handsome, Ivy League-educated, dilettante president. But at this point in our history, my bet is people are going to take you far more seriously than you expect. In fact, I think you're going to get what you deserve – the trash heap. Why will Americans turn on you so rapidly and so completely?
Two things have changed – forever – about American politics.
The first is the media and access to critical information. It's no longer possible for a president's administration to control what people read, see, and think by simply managing the evening news broadcasts.
Thus, all your lies are now exposed almost instantly and broadcast to millions of people via websites and services like the Drudge Report, Twitter, and Facebook. Socialism cannot possibly survive over any long period of time in a society with a free media – because socialism is based on a lie. Facebook means the "half-life" of socialism is now weeks instead of years.
Even mainstream publications like the Wall Street Journal have called you a liar recently. They have no choice. Your lies were broadcast to the entire world long before their op-ed pieces appeared.
Your advisors told you none of these "bloggers" mattered. All you had to do was promise more benefits to more voters and then force fewer voters to pay for it all. I'm sure you did the political calculus. You believed your power to bribe and bamboozle the poor and the ignorant was stronger than the resentment you'd engender among the "rich." And I must admit… since at least World War II, that's been a safe bet in American politics.
But you forgot one critical factor: We simply can't afford this nonsense anymore…
Immediately after your speech, the price of silver went from $39 to a new high above $42. Gold went up, too.
These are signs, Mr. President, that the world is losing confidence in our currency. If our foreign creditors were to call in our debts, America would suffer an economic cataclysm unlike anything we've ever seen in our entire history.
Americans now owe a total of $56 trillion. Without the Fed's money-printing, it's unlikely we could afford even the interest on these existing debts… much less the $1.5 trillion or more in debt you continue to rack up year after year by promising benefits we haven't earned.
Sooner or later, our foreign creditors are going to decide our money-printing amounts to a default, and they will stop buying our bonds. On that day, everyone who trusts you, everyone who believes in your lies, will be wiped out.
But that won't be as many people as you expect.
Almost every American knows in his heart what made this country great for the 200 years between 1776 and 1976. It wasn't the lies of our presidents. It wasn't our ability to print money and rip off our Chinese creditors. It wasn't the modern crybaby mentality of our school system or our unions. It wasn't the baby boomer's dream of a 40-year retirement with free prescription drugs.
And it sure as hell wasn't a suave, made-for-TV version of Karl Marx promising everything to everyone, but with no way to pay for it.
No. What built America was her people's unwavering faith that they were free to enjoy the rewards of their accomplishments.
As our country tumbles into bankruptcy and crisis, the people are going to want their prosperity back, Mr. President. And deep down, they all know… even your most fervent supporters know… you don't have the goods. You don't have the foggiest idea of how to deliver prosperity to America because, really, you don't understand what America is all about.
Regards,
Porter Stansberry
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Welcome to the ashbin of society.
With the speech you gave last week, you have firmly and permanently put yourself in the same garbage bag as all the other communists and socialists of the 20th century.
Your speech sounded like the faint echo of a speech Lenin gave in an icy square in Moscow 100 years ago.
The promises you made, Mr. President, about the government giving people things they can't provide for themselves – a better income, reliable health care, an advanced education, cheaper mortgages, a "shiny, happy" life – have been made time and time again… sometimes by speakers even better than you.
And they have always been lies.
While the government can demand obedience (and taxes), it can't mandate dedication, creativity, or innovation. The fact is, the government itself is nothing more (or less) than the organized ambitions of the people.
Promising something to the people that they don't already have is a logical absurdity. And therein lies the timeless flaw of all collectivist theory: Governments cannot deliver benefits to the people that the people cannot deliver to themselves.
To demonstrate this truth, consider this example… Governments cannot simply mandate higher tax revenue. Any substantial increase to tax rates will reduce total collections, an economic phenomenon known as the "Laffer Curve."
This has been proven countless times in our country and many others. Any sensible person will immediately understand why. Taxes are a disincentive. The higher the marginal rate of tax, the more powerful its impact.
That's why, over many decades (and many different tax structures), U.S. tax revenues have been remarkably stable at around 20% of GDP. That's why, as you surely know, Mr. President, changing the tax code will not result in increased tax revenue.
Taxing only the rich simply doesn't work. It never has. And it never will. To increase the government's revenues, we must first increase the size of the economy. The government cannot tax what the economy doesn't produce.
In another time, most Americans might have simply ignored your speech as the ignorant remarks of yet another handsome, Ivy League-educated, dilettante president. But at this point in our history, my bet is people are going to take you far more seriously than you expect. In fact, I think you're going to get what you deserve – the trash heap. Why will Americans turn on you so rapidly and so completely?
Two things have changed – forever – about American politics.
The first is the media and access to critical information. It's no longer possible for a president's administration to control what people read, see, and think by simply managing the evening news broadcasts.
Thus, all your lies are now exposed almost instantly and broadcast to millions of people via websites and services like the Drudge Report, Twitter, and Facebook. Socialism cannot possibly survive over any long period of time in a society with a free media – because socialism is based on a lie. Facebook means the "half-life" of socialism is now weeks instead of years.
Even mainstream publications like the Wall Street Journal have called you a liar recently. They have no choice. Your lies were broadcast to the entire world long before their op-ed pieces appeared.
Your advisors told you none of these "bloggers" mattered. All you had to do was promise more benefits to more voters and then force fewer voters to pay for it all. I'm sure you did the political calculus. You believed your power to bribe and bamboozle the poor and the ignorant was stronger than the resentment you'd engender among the "rich." And I must admit… since at least World War II, that's been a safe bet in American politics.
But you forgot one critical factor: We simply can't afford this nonsense anymore…
Immediately after your speech, the price of silver went from $39 to a new high above $42. Gold went up, too.
These are signs, Mr. President, that the world is losing confidence in our currency. If our foreign creditors were to call in our debts, America would suffer an economic cataclysm unlike anything we've ever seen in our entire history.
Americans now owe a total of $56 trillion. Without the Fed's money-printing, it's unlikely we could afford even the interest on these existing debts… much less the $1.5 trillion or more in debt you continue to rack up year after year by promising benefits we haven't earned.
Sooner or later, our foreign creditors are going to decide our money-printing amounts to a default, and they will stop buying our bonds. On that day, everyone who trusts you, everyone who believes in your lies, will be wiped out.
But that won't be as many people as you expect.
Almost every American knows in his heart what made this country great for the 200 years between 1776 and 1976. It wasn't the lies of our presidents. It wasn't our ability to print money and rip off our Chinese creditors. It wasn't the modern crybaby mentality of our school system or our unions. It wasn't the baby boomer's dream of a 40-year retirement with free prescription drugs.
And it sure as hell wasn't a suave, made-for-TV version of Karl Marx promising everything to everyone, but with no way to pay for it.
No. What built America was her people's unwavering faith that they were free to enjoy the rewards of their accomplishments.
As our country tumbles into bankruptcy and crisis, the people are going to want their prosperity back, Mr. President. And deep down, they all know… even your most fervent supporters know… you don't have the goods. You don't have the foggiest idea of how to deliver prosperity to America because, really, you don't understand what America is all about.
Regards,
Porter Stansberry
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Statement from MORT KUFF
Attention: Every Conservative, Independent, Republican, Liberal, Progressive, Democrat who is a qualified, registered voter.
It is up to each and every principled person of voting age in each of the fifty states, to cast his or her vote for the successful Republican nominee for President of the United States..
We must, each and every one of us must do this to assure that never again, will an un-natural disaster like Barack Hussein Obama, be permitted to strike our shores.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
—Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
It is up to each and every principled person of voting age in each of the fifty states, to cast his or her vote for the successful Republican nominee for President of the United States..
We must, each and every one of us must do this to assure that never again, will an un-natural disaster like Barack Hussein Obama, be permitted to strike our shores.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
—Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Labels:
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Hate-USA,
Liberals-Lie,
Mort-Kuff,
MORTs-Meanderings,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Racist-Sotomayor
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Thank You Lt. Col Terry Lakin For Your Service
We should salute this fine Doctor. So our Troops do not need good Doctors during the War? Instead to protect Barry Soetoro, Doctors go to jail. This is a sick Regime! Doctors are put in jail for wanting to know if they are serving a usurper? Hussein not only hates America but he hates our Military. Must be that ACORN and Weatherman with the Weather Underground training.
Doc jailed over Obama’s hidden birth certificate free in less than 3 weeks
Friends of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin are hoping a few hundred people will show up to greet the jailed military doctor when he’s released from prison and returns to Baltimore, Md., on May 14.
Dr. Terry Lakin, an Army doctor who refused to deploy again to Afghanistan when his chain of command refused to verify that Obama legitimately is president, has been serving a six-month term at Ft. Leavenworth in Kansas.
A website has been established to coordinate the welcome event, which convenes at 10:15 a.m. at the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Organizers are asking supporters to preregister their planned attendance – to coordinate with airport security – and to come with small U.S. flags and homemade posters thanking Dr. Lakin for his stand.
“We need a big hurray and lots of applause,” the website states. “He may say a few words. Then we’ll get him to his luggage, to his car and home.”
Let's support our Troops and say NO to Radical Islam and Muslim Terrorists!
Doc jailed over Obama’s hidden birth certificate free in less than 3 weeks
Friends of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin are hoping a few hundred people will show up to greet the jailed military doctor when he’s released from prison and returns to Baltimore, Md., on May 14.
Dr. Terry Lakin, an Army doctor who refused to deploy again to Afghanistan when his chain of command refused to verify that Obama legitimately is president, has been serving a six-month term at Ft. Leavenworth in Kansas.
A website has been established to coordinate the welcome event, which convenes at 10:15 a.m. at the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Organizers are asking supporters to preregister their planned attendance – to coordinate with airport security – and to come with small U.S. flags and homemade posters thanking Dr. Lakin for his stand.
“We need a big hurray and lots of applause,” the website states. “He may say a few words. Then we’ll get him to his luggage, to his car and home.”
Let's support our Troops and say NO to Radical Islam and Muslim Terrorists!
Labels:
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetero,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Hate-USA,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Racist-Kent-Wong,
Stop-Marxism
Friday, April 15, 2011
Can We Get Marco Rubio & Allen West in White House
My deep gratitude to Congressman Allen West
Even before the New York Times Breaking News Alert hit my inbox to let me know that the House of Representatives had passed the "budget deal" in a 260-167 vote, Rep. Allen West had already apprised me of how he voted and why. As I have subscribed to his email list, I received a copy of his Statement for the Congressional Record.
This is it, in its entirety. It may be the first time ever that reading the Congressional Record has made me cry.
Allen West is a superior public servant, and even though I am not one of his fortunate constituents, I am nevertheless deeply grateful for the distinguished and honorable manner in which he comports himself and the seriousness, honesty and transparency with which he serves.
Mr. Speaker: This past weekend I had an important milestone occur in my life. My oldest daughter, Aubrey, turned 18 years old. It seems like it was only yesterday that I held this small baby in the palm of my hand and now she is a grown mature woman about to start college and begin the next phase of her life.
I flew back to Florida last Saturday so that I could be with her on this very special day in her life. Turning 18 is important for every American. Because at 18 years old, under the law, you are now considered an adult and she was proud to register for the most important right – the right to vote for our elected leaders.
When my daughter was born in 1993 the Federal Government debt was $4.3 trillion. Just 18 years later, I will shortly be faced with a vote on whether to raise the debt limit to over $15 trillion dollars. When I held my daughter as a baby, I never thought that our nation would be in such financial distress and on its way to a major economic catastrophe.
Over the weekend, as I celebrated with my daughter, I thought even harder about what the United States will be like when she will be my age and what would her son or daughter, my grandchildren, think when they look back in the history books at this critical time in our Republic’s history.
Last November, the citizens of the 22nd Congressional District, and millions of Americans, voted for a new direction for our country. They sent a message to our elected representatives that we needed to end out-of-control government spending, reduce our national debt, and get our fiscal house in order.
The Democrat Majority and President Obama over the last two years have produced deficits of $1.4 and $1.25 trillion, and the President has produced a Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 which would add another $1.6 trillion.
The American people know that the federal government is collecting $2.2 trillion and spending $3.7 trillion this year.The American people know that forty cents of every dollar the federal government spends is borrowed, much of it from China. The American people also know our nation is piling up new debt at the rate of $4 billion a day.
The Era of Big Government Spending is Over! In 100 days the debate in Washington has gone from a freeze in government spending to addressing cuts in spending.
As we are all aware, the 111th Congress was controlled by overwhelming Democrat majorities in the House of Representatives and the United States Senate. Yet even with these enormous majorities, Congress failed to pass a budget or any of the Appropriations bills.
Members of the former Majority Party in the House of Representatives have now resorted to the political rhetoric that the Republican Party is trying to kill women, starve seniors, and the budget deal is the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians. They make these statements even after Majority Leader Reid and President Obama recognize that we need to cut federal spending.
This type of political rhetoric is beneath us. We can disagree on the direction we are taking our nation, but let us have a debate on the facts and policies. The American people demand an adult conversation instead of childish name calling.
Mr. Speaker, I want to take a moment to briefly summarize my thoughts and votes during the negotiations for the Budget for Fiscal Year 2011. I voted for the first short term Continuing Resolution in the 112th Congress in order to provide Speaker Boehner the necessary time to negotiate with an intransigent United States Senate and White House.
I voted against the second Continuing Resolution because I believed that we were continuing to kick a can down the road, and that the Obama Administration and Members of the Democrat Party wanted to force the Federal Government into a shutdown in order to win political points. It seems their goal is the hope that by shutting down the Federal Government, the American people will perceive an inflexible Republican Party and return the Democrats to power in the next election.
I voted for the Department of Defense Appropriations bill, which contained another short term Continuing Resolution, in order to support my Brothers and Sisters in uniform. However, I made the Leadership of the Republican Party aware that I believed using the military as a bargaining chip in the negotiations as a way to pass yet another continuing resolution was indefensible.
As the clock approached the time to shut down the Federal Government, an agreement was finally reached. In order to draft the bill and provide time for the American people to review the bill, the House considered, and I voted in favor of another Short Term Continuing Resolution. I always stated it was never my intention to shutdown the Federal Government.
At the Army Airborne school in 1984 I had a black hat instructor say, “If you set the bar low, you will jump low!” Today, I will be voting against the negotiated agreement because I believe that we set the bar too low and it does not fulfill the promise I made to the constituents of the 22nd Congressional District of Florida. While this bill is a step in the right direction, I am voting against the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2011, H.R. 1473 because it is important for elected leaders to stand by the pledges we make to the American People.
It takes five miles to turn an aircraft carrier, I am pleased, that finally, the Republican Leadership has finally taken control of the helm and begun to turn the wheel. However, I believe we need to turn the wheel a little harder. At this moment in our nation’s history, when the facts are so clear and the political hyperbole is so hollow, my vote reflects that we need more to get our ship of state on the right course.
That is what my adult daughter Aubrey expects, that is what my teenage daughter, Austen expects, that is what my wife Angela expects and that is what every American expects.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Even before the New York Times Breaking News Alert hit my inbox to let me know that the House of Representatives had passed the "budget deal" in a 260-167 vote, Rep. Allen West had already apprised me of how he voted and why. As I have subscribed to his email list, I received a copy of his Statement for the Congressional Record.
This is it, in its entirety. It may be the first time ever that reading the Congressional Record has made me cry.
Allen West is a superior public servant, and even though I am not one of his fortunate constituents, I am nevertheless deeply grateful for the distinguished and honorable manner in which he comports himself and the seriousness, honesty and transparency with which he serves.
Mr. Speaker: This past weekend I had an important milestone occur in my life. My oldest daughter, Aubrey, turned 18 years old. It seems like it was only yesterday that I held this small baby in the palm of my hand and now she is a grown mature woman about to start college and begin the next phase of her life.
I flew back to Florida last Saturday so that I could be with her on this very special day in her life. Turning 18 is important for every American. Because at 18 years old, under the law, you are now considered an adult and she was proud to register for the most important right – the right to vote for our elected leaders.
When my daughter was born in 1993 the Federal Government debt was $4.3 trillion. Just 18 years later, I will shortly be faced with a vote on whether to raise the debt limit to over $15 trillion dollars. When I held my daughter as a baby, I never thought that our nation would be in such financial distress and on its way to a major economic catastrophe.
Over the weekend, as I celebrated with my daughter, I thought even harder about what the United States will be like when she will be my age and what would her son or daughter, my grandchildren, think when they look back in the history books at this critical time in our Republic’s history.
Last November, the citizens of the 22nd Congressional District, and millions of Americans, voted for a new direction for our country. They sent a message to our elected representatives that we needed to end out-of-control government spending, reduce our national debt, and get our fiscal house in order.
The Democrat Majority and President Obama over the last two years have produced deficits of $1.4 and $1.25 trillion, and the President has produced a Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 which would add another $1.6 trillion.
The American people know that the federal government is collecting $2.2 trillion and spending $3.7 trillion this year.The American people know that forty cents of every dollar the federal government spends is borrowed, much of it from China. The American people also know our nation is piling up new debt at the rate of $4 billion a day.
The Era of Big Government Spending is Over! In 100 days the debate in Washington has gone from a freeze in government spending to addressing cuts in spending.
As we are all aware, the 111th Congress was controlled by overwhelming Democrat majorities in the House of Representatives and the United States Senate. Yet even with these enormous majorities, Congress failed to pass a budget or any of the Appropriations bills.
Members of the former Majority Party in the House of Representatives have now resorted to the political rhetoric that the Republican Party is trying to kill women, starve seniors, and the budget deal is the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians. They make these statements even after Majority Leader Reid and President Obama recognize that we need to cut federal spending.
This type of political rhetoric is beneath us. We can disagree on the direction we are taking our nation, but let us have a debate on the facts and policies. The American people demand an adult conversation instead of childish name calling.
Mr. Speaker, I want to take a moment to briefly summarize my thoughts and votes during the negotiations for the Budget for Fiscal Year 2011. I voted for the first short term Continuing Resolution in the 112th Congress in order to provide Speaker Boehner the necessary time to negotiate with an intransigent United States Senate and White House.
I voted against the second Continuing Resolution because I believed that we were continuing to kick a can down the road, and that the Obama Administration and Members of the Democrat Party wanted to force the Federal Government into a shutdown in order to win political points. It seems their goal is the hope that by shutting down the Federal Government, the American people will perceive an inflexible Republican Party and return the Democrats to power in the next election.
I voted for the Department of Defense Appropriations bill, which contained another short term Continuing Resolution, in order to support my Brothers and Sisters in uniform. However, I made the Leadership of the Republican Party aware that I believed using the military as a bargaining chip in the negotiations as a way to pass yet another continuing resolution was indefensible.
As the clock approached the time to shut down the Federal Government, an agreement was finally reached. In order to draft the bill and provide time for the American people to review the bill, the House considered, and I voted in favor of another Short Term Continuing Resolution. I always stated it was never my intention to shutdown the Federal Government.
At the Army Airborne school in 1984 I had a black hat instructor say, “If you set the bar low, you will jump low!” Today, I will be voting against the negotiated agreement because I believe that we set the bar too low and it does not fulfill the promise I made to the constituents of the 22nd Congressional District of Florida. While this bill is a step in the right direction, I am voting against the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2011, H.R. 1473 because it is important for elected leaders to stand by the pledges we make to the American People.
It takes five miles to turn an aircraft carrier, I am pleased, that finally, the Republican Leadership has finally taken control of the helm and begun to turn the wheel. However, I believe we need to turn the wheel a little harder. At this moment in our nation’s history, when the facts are so clear and the political hyperbole is so hollow, my vote reflects that we need more to get our ship of state on the right course.
That is what my adult daughter Aubrey expects, that is what my teenage daughter, Austen expects, that is what my wife Angela expects and that is what every American expects.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Allen-West,
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetero,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Stop-Marxism,
Veterans
Monday, April 11, 2011
The Marxist Bully and the Birth Certificate
Donald Trump continues his onslaught on Barry Soetoro. FINALLY someone is giving the proper Hardcore attack on the Community Organizer. Liberals are too ignorant, too scared or blinded by the Nazi MSM to question "why is this Anti-American Marxist Bully in the White House". Below is a very informative article by Seth Forman.
Donald Trump Scores an Important Victory... Over the Media
Written by By Seth Forman
Donald Trump is a shameless self-promoter. His prowess as a developer and businessman has been greatly exaggerated. He has crawled around in the muck and mire of what now passes for popular culture, and deserves at least some of the blame for tawdry's victory over grace in that sphere. He is an outsized egotist (about on a par with Obama) whose passion for self-congratulation is the only reliable thing we know about him. And that his future candidacy for president may soon be taken seriously owes to no one so much as it does Barack Obama, whose own candidacy seriously eroded the standards for presidential qualification.
But Trump has achieved something important. His decision to focus like a laser on Obama's failure to produce a birth certificate has highlighted the absolute corruption of the American media on the subject of Obama, and the dangers of power granted in the absence of an unaligned press.
Given that Obama's primary claim to the presidency has been his compelling life story -- his biracialism, his international upbringing, especially the time he spent in Muslim lands -- the media has shown shockingly little interest in several pieces of information about Obama's life which might legitimately concern voters. Nowhere in his biographies, for example, does Obama mention his 1981 trip to Pakistan, where he stayed with influential political leaders from that country at a time when a State Department advisory warned U.S. citizens against travel to Pakistan. There has also been a strange disinterest in Obama's 2006 trip to Kenya where, as a sitting U.S. senator, Obama criticized the incumbent government (a U.S. ally) and barnstormed with a Marxist candidate he supported. So too, there has been nary a peep among media elites over Obama's funding of the radical "education" work of bomb thrower Bill Ayers, or his own work on behalf of the activist group ACORN, the now defunct largest purveyor of voter registration fraud in American history (and, apparently, an enabler of under aged prostitution.).
One of the functions of the media is to protect the public from fraudulent statements made by public figures. The unwillingness of the media to fulfill this role in the case of Obama has led to significant, and probably needless, public tension. Obama's resistance to releasing the long version of his birth certificate, has served not only to raise legitimate speculation about the circumstances surrounding his birth, but to give fodder to anti-Obama extremists.
Gail Collins, the New York Times's most reliably uninteresting liberal attack dog, questioned Trump's sanity just for raising the birth certificate issue. But would she say the same about famed black Vanderbilt University Law Professor and Obama supporter Carol Swain? Swain has said "I think that by not releasing it [the full birth certificate], it makes people much more passionately opposed to the president. Moreover, for a president who was elected on the basis of his personal background, it is troubling that Obama himself would want to withhold such basic information."
The media's curiosity about the background of those running for national office seemed to know no bounds when it came to George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard or the sexual behavior of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's daughter. But during and since the 2008 campaign a virtual wall of silence has been constructed around Obama.
This has important implications for the country. Questions about Obama's family and his relationship to Islam, for example, and hence his world view, remain subjects of speculation. Former CIA officer Larry Johnson, for example, believes that the full birth record from the State of Hawaii was probably amended in 1968 to show Obama was adopted by his step father, the Indonesian Muslim Lolo Soetoro, that he became formally known for a time as "Barry Soetoro," and may even have his religion listed as Muslim. This would completely change what Obama has said about his past and represent a public fraud of a very significant magnitude.
At the very least the full record might help explain Obama's strange discomfort with exercising American power against radical Muslim regimes in Libya and elsewhere, where he has farmed out the defense of American interests to the United Nations, and his insistence on "dialogue" with rogue Muslim regimes in Syria and Iran. All of this while touting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Al Qaeda associated Muslim opposition groups in Libya as democracy craving freedom fighters.
Some of the missing details of Obama's life are doubtlessly trivial. Obama probably has benign explanations for not providing more information about them. Even Trump admits that the evidence strongly suggests Obama was born in Hawaii and is an American citizen. But that Obama has not yet released this information, and that the media refuses to criticize him for not doing so, is a testament not to the insanity of the "birthers," but to Obama's penchant for secrecy, and the dangerous amount of latitude the media has been willing to cede him.
Seth Forman is author of American Obsession: Race and Conflict in the Age of Obama (forthcoming, Booklocker), and blogs at www.mrformansplanet.com
Donald Trump Scores an Important Victory... Over the Media
Written by By Seth Forman
Donald Trump is a shameless self-promoter. His prowess as a developer and businessman has been greatly exaggerated. He has crawled around in the muck and mire of what now passes for popular culture, and deserves at least some of the blame for tawdry's victory over grace in that sphere. He is an outsized egotist (about on a par with Obama) whose passion for self-congratulation is the only reliable thing we know about him. And that his future candidacy for president may soon be taken seriously owes to no one so much as it does Barack Obama, whose own candidacy seriously eroded the standards for presidential qualification.
But Trump has achieved something important. His decision to focus like a laser on Obama's failure to produce a birth certificate has highlighted the absolute corruption of the American media on the subject of Obama, and the dangers of power granted in the absence of an unaligned press.
Given that Obama's primary claim to the presidency has been his compelling life story -- his biracialism, his international upbringing, especially the time he spent in Muslim lands -- the media has shown shockingly little interest in several pieces of information about Obama's life which might legitimately concern voters. Nowhere in his biographies, for example, does Obama mention his 1981 trip to Pakistan, where he stayed with influential political leaders from that country at a time when a State Department advisory warned U.S. citizens against travel to Pakistan. There has also been a strange disinterest in Obama's 2006 trip to Kenya where, as a sitting U.S. senator, Obama criticized the incumbent government (a U.S. ally) and barnstormed with a Marxist candidate he supported. So too, there has been nary a peep among media elites over Obama's funding of the radical "education" work of bomb thrower Bill Ayers, or his own work on behalf of the activist group ACORN, the now defunct largest purveyor of voter registration fraud in American history (and, apparently, an enabler of under aged prostitution.).
One of the functions of the media is to protect the public from fraudulent statements made by public figures. The unwillingness of the media to fulfill this role in the case of Obama has led to significant, and probably needless, public tension. Obama's resistance to releasing the long version of his birth certificate, has served not only to raise legitimate speculation about the circumstances surrounding his birth, but to give fodder to anti-Obama extremists.
Gail Collins, the New York Times's most reliably uninteresting liberal attack dog, questioned Trump's sanity just for raising the birth certificate issue. But would she say the same about famed black Vanderbilt University Law Professor and Obama supporter Carol Swain? Swain has said "I think that by not releasing it [the full birth certificate], it makes people much more passionately opposed to the president. Moreover, for a president who was elected on the basis of his personal background, it is troubling that Obama himself would want to withhold such basic information."
The media's curiosity about the background of those running for national office seemed to know no bounds when it came to George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard or the sexual behavior of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's daughter. But during and since the 2008 campaign a virtual wall of silence has been constructed around Obama.
This has important implications for the country. Questions about Obama's family and his relationship to Islam, for example, and hence his world view, remain subjects of speculation. Former CIA officer Larry Johnson, for example, believes that the full birth record from the State of Hawaii was probably amended in 1968 to show Obama was adopted by his step father, the Indonesian Muslim Lolo Soetoro, that he became formally known for a time as "Barry Soetoro," and may even have his religion listed as Muslim. This would completely change what Obama has said about his past and represent a public fraud of a very significant magnitude.
At the very least the full record might help explain Obama's strange discomfort with exercising American power against radical Muslim regimes in Libya and elsewhere, where he has farmed out the defense of American interests to the United Nations, and his insistence on "dialogue" with rogue Muslim regimes in Syria and Iran. All of this while touting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Al Qaeda associated Muslim opposition groups in Libya as democracy craving freedom fighters.
Some of the missing details of Obama's life are doubtlessly trivial. Obama probably has benign explanations for not providing more information about them. Even Trump admits that the evidence strongly suggests Obama was born in Hawaii and is an American citizen. But that Obama has not yet released this information, and that the media refuses to criticize him for not doing so, is a testament not to the insanity of the "birthers," but to Obama's penchant for secrecy, and the dangerous amount of latitude the media has been willing to cede him.
Seth Forman is author of American Obsession: Race and Conflict in the Age of Obama (forthcoming, Booklocker), and blogs at www.mrformansplanet.com
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Bill-Ayers,
Civilian-National-Security,
Community-Organizer,
Facist,
Liberal-Fraud,
MSM-Frauds,
Nazi-Democrat,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
Nazi-MSM
Sunday, April 10, 2011
The Racist Left Wing Democrat Party tell White People to DIE!
I know some of you will not be shocked on the Racist comments by Hispanic Leaders. There is "Free Speech" for Nazis and Liberals (I know they are one in the same) but when a Professor at UCLA shouts out to get rid of White People, well we have a major problem. The RACIST Kent Wong wants White People gone from leadership positions. Did RACIST Kent Wong hook up with a Barely Legal Hispanic girl and hear some sob stories, so he wants all White People punished? Did some guy who was White steal RACIST Kent Wong's lunch money so he wants all White People punished?
These Liberal Nazis want Conservatives and White People in the concentration camps or as Barry Soetoro calls them, "re-education camps". Remember Barry Hussein Soetoro called for all Hispanic Women to vote and punish "Republicans"? We all know behind closed doors, RACIST Kent Wong. Racist Rev Wright, Anti-Semitic Al Sharpton and Barry Soetoro rip each other and Whites, especially those who practice the Jewish faith.
"You old white people. It is your duty to die." HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT!
Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die . . Through love of having children, we are going to take over.
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."
Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."
Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it."
Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember
187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."
Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."
Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
THE U.S. VS MEXICO: On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more.
DID YOU KNOW?: Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so? According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members; 98% of which are Mexican and Asian. How's your county doing?
According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households nationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces." Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.
Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."
WHEN I WAS YOUNG: When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breath free. They wanted to become Americans. Now too many immigrants come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges--affirmative action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.
HOW CAN YOU HELP? Send this posting to as many people as possible.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
These Liberal Nazis want Conservatives and White People in the concentration camps or as Barry Soetoro calls them, "re-education camps". Remember Barry Hussein Soetoro called for all Hispanic Women to vote and punish "Republicans"? We all know behind closed doors, RACIST Kent Wong. Racist Rev Wright, Anti-Semitic Al Sharpton and Barry Soetoro rip each other and Whites, especially those who practice the Jewish faith.
"You old white people. It is your duty to die." HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT!
Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die . . Through love of having children, we are going to take over.
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."
Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."
Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it."
Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember
187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."
Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."
Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
THE U.S. VS MEXICO: On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more.
DID YOU KNOW?: Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so? According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members; 98% of which are Mexican and Asian. How's your county doing?
According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households nationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces." Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.
Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."
WHEN I WAS YOUNG: When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breath free. They wanted to become Americans. Now too many immigrants come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges--affirmative action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.
HOW CAN YOU HELP? Send this posting to as many people as possible.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetero,
Bill-Ayers,
Food-Nazi-Michelle-Obama,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Racist-Kent-Wong,
Stop-Marxism,
Weather-Underground
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Friends of the Regime & The Ethics of Killing all White Babies
Watch this Video to see how sick Barry Soetoro's friends really are!
So when lowlifes like Howard Dean call Glenn Beck a Racist for fighting against this
Marxist regime, think about this Video and the New Black Panthers Video HERE.
Labels:
Bill-Ayers,
Black-Panther-Racist,
Conservative-Blog,
Nazi-Democrat,
Race-Baiter,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Friday, June 11, 2010
Ayers' Plan For Re-education Camps & The Need To Kill
This Video is from Larry Grathwohl. Mr. Grathwohl talks about Ayers' plan for American re-education camps and the need to kill millions of Americans.
Barry Hussein Soetero and his so-called Wife, Michele, are personal friends and associates for many years, with low-life Bill Ayers and his disgusting degenerate wife Bernadine Dorhn. Bill Ayers and dirtbag Dorhn helped run the Weather Underground. They was dead serious about their intentions. In 1972 Ayers dedicated the Weather Underground's manifesto, "Prairie Fire", to Sen. Robert Kennedy's assassin, Sirhan Sirhan.
Labels:
Barack-Hussein-Obama,
Barry-Soetero,
Bernadine-Dorhn,
Bill-Ayers,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Obamas-re-education-camps,
Odinga,
Stop-Marxism,
Video,
Weather-Underground
Sunday, January 31, 2010
No Rules for Radicals. Stop Marxism!
A great, short Video which even shows Barry Hussein Soetero's buddy, Ayers, dirty feet on our American Flag.
What a despicable group, these Radical Democrats. They Despise the Middle Class yet so many self-loathing Americans support this B. Hussein Obama and his #Thugs.
The Video is written, performed & produced by Joe Dan Gorman
Labels:
bathhouse-barry,
Bill-Ayers,
Crooked-Democrats,
democrat-bullies,
fight-radical-islam,
terrorist-Bernadine-Dorhn
Monday, November 30, 2009
The Lowdown on The Weathermen
A look into the communist revolutionary Weatherman organization, and two of its leaders, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
Barrack Hussein Obama and Radical Michelle Obama became close friends and worked with the Despicable Ayers & Loathsome Dohrn.
Would any of these Marxist or the Czars be allowed near the White House when Reagan or Bush was President. Have we sunk this low, so fast?
You must punish these Marxist at the Polls in 2010!
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Bill-Ayers,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Democrat-Lies,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Stop-Marxism,
Video,
Weather-Underground,
Weathermen-lowlifes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)