Showing posts with label Racist-Oprah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racist-Oprah. Show all posts
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Obama Affair with Larry Sinclair
Barry Soetoro has admitted numerous times of his gay sex and doing drugs. Yet anyone who brings it up is called a Racist. The Liberals are so blind yet they see Barry Soetoro wants to destroy the American way and they support him.
Even the Mother Of Obama’s Murdered Gay Lover has been speaking out. Larry Sinclair's murder was senseless. Yes he was gay and attended the racist Church of Rev. Wright yet that is no reason for Liberal Thugs to kill him.
There were two other openly gay men in Racist Reverend Wright’s church: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer.
In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1½ months, all three men “conveniently” died:
Bland was murdered execution-style on November 17, 2007;
Young was murdered execution-style on December 24, 2007;
Spencer reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV on December 26, 2007
Larry Sinclair, the gay man who claimed to have had two sexual encounters with Obama in Chicago in 1999, wrote a book, “Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder,” in which he states that Obama was linked to Young’s murder. Sinclair wrote that he was in contact with Young shortly before his murder and Young revealed his relationship with Obama
Friday, September 30, 2011
Obama’s Historic Firsts
OBAMA says he’s the the representative for change… He’s historic, alright – Check out the changes below:
First President to refuse to show a valid Birth Certificate.
First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner
First President to have a social security number from a state he’s never even lived in
First President to Preside over a Cut to the Credit Rating of the United States Government
First President to Violate the War Powers Act
First President to Orchestrate the Sale of Murder Weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels
First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for Illegally Obstructing Oil Drilling in the Gulf of Mexico
First President to Defy a Federal Judge’s Court Order to Cease Implementing the ‘Health Care Reform’ Law
First President to Require All Americans to Purchase a Product From a Third Party
First President to Spend a Trillion Dollars on ‘Shovel-Ready’ Jobs– and Later Admit There Was No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Jobs
First President to Abrogate Bankruptcy Law to Turn Over Control of Companies to His Union Supporters
First President to Bypass Congress and Implement the DREAM Act Through Executive Fiat
First President to “Order a Secret Amnesty Program that Stopped the Deportations of Illegal Immigrants Across the US , Including Those With Criminal Convictions”
First President to Demand a Company Hand Over $20 Billion to One of His Political Appointees
First President to Terminate America’s Ability to Put a Man into Space
First President to Encourage Racial Discrimination and Intimidation at Polling Places
First President to Have a Law Signed By an ‘Auto-pen’ Without Being “Present”
First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It
First President to Threaten Insurance Companies if they Publicly Speak out on the Reasons for their Rate Increases
First President to Tell a Major Manufacturing Company In Which State They Are Allowed to Locate a Factory
First President to File Lawsuits Against the States He Swore an Oath to Protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN, etc)
First President to Withdraw an Existing Coal Permit That Had Been Properly Issued Years Ago (He said he will bankrupt the Coal Industry. This will help send many families to become poor and dependent on Government)
First President to Fire an Inspector General of Ameri-corps for Catching One of His Friends in a Corruption Case
First President to Propose an Executive Order Demanding Companies Disclose Their Political Contributions to Bid on Government Contracts
First President to appoint 45 ‘czars’ to replace elected officials in his office.
First President to Golf 73 separate Times in His First Two-and-a-Half Years in Office
First President to hide his medical, educational, and travel records
First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it
First President to coddle America’s enemies while alienating America’s allies
First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the US flag
First President to go on multiple Global apology tours But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs, affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is repaired, etc, etc
First President to go on 17 ‘vacations’, including ‘date nights’ paid for by the taxpayer.
Liberals are by nature liars. Their beliefs are to drive Americans into the hands of the Big Government. Hypocrisy is the middle name of Liberals. Look at how the rich Liberals live and they want to keep the slaves on the plantation.
First President to refuse to show a valid Birth Certificate.
First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner
First President to have a social security number from a state he’s never even lived in
First President to Preside over a Cut to the Credit Rating of the United States Government
First President to Violate the War Powers Act
First President to Orchestrate the Sale of Murder Weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels
First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for Illegally Obstructing Oil Drilling in the Gulf of Mexico
First President to Defy a Federal Judge’s Court Order to Cease Implementing the ‘Health Care Reform’ Law
First President to Require All Americans to Purchase a Product From a Third Party
First President to Spend a Trillion Dollars on ‘Shovel-Ready’ Jobs– and Later Admit There Was No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Jobs
First President to Abrogate Bankruptcy Law to Turn Over Control of Companies to His Union Supporters
First President to Bypass Congress and Implement the DREAM Act Through Executive Fiat
First President to “Order a Secret Amnesty Program that Stopped the Deportations of Illegal Immigrants Across the US , Including Those With Criminal Convictions”
First President to Demand a Company Hand Over $20 Billion to One of His Political Appointees
First President to Terminate America’s Ability to Put a Man into Space
First President to Encourage Racial Discrimination and Intimidation at Polling Places
First President to Have a Law Signed By an ‘Auto-pen’ Without Being “Present”
First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It
First President to Threaten Insurance Companies if they Publicly Speak out on the Reasons for their Rate Increases
First President to Tell a Major Manufacturing Company In Which State They Are Allowed to Locate a Factory
First President to File Lawsuits Against the States He Swore an Oath to Protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN, etc)
First President to Withdraw an Existing Coal Permit That Had Been Properly Issued Years Ago (He said he will bankrupt the Coal Industry. This will help send many families to become poor and dependent on Government)
First President to Fire an Inspector General of Ameri-corps for Catching One of His Friends in a Corruption Case
First President to Propose an Executive Order Demanding Companies Disclose Their Political Contributions to Bid on Government Contracts
First President to appoint 45 ‘czars’ to replace elected officials in his office.
First President to Golf 73 separate Times in His First Two-and-a-Half Years in Office
First President to hide his medical, educational, and travel records
First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it
First President to coddle America’s enemies while alienating America’s allies
First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the US flag
First President to go on multiple Global apology tours But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs, affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is repaired, etc, etc
First President to go on 17 ‘vacations’, including ‘date nights’ paid for by the taxpayer.
Liberals are by nature liars. Their beliefs are to drive Americans into the hands of the Big Government. Hypocrisy is the middle name of Liberals. Look at how the rich Liberals live and they want to keep the slaves on the plantation.
Labels:
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Barbara-Boxer,
Racist-Left,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism
Monday, July 25, 2011
The Messiah Gives Our Money to Hate Groups
Barry Soetoro continues to cry about Debt problems. Well, maybe if he would not give billions who Hate Groups (La Raza, ACORN, etc) and People that were in the Shirley Sherrod Black farmer scam, there would be less debt problems. This is reparations and fuel the poor by taking away from the hard working middle class. Incompetent, Racist and vile is the only way to describe this failing Messiah.
Obama Gives Discriminated Hispanic, Women Farmers $1.3 Billion
A year after giving black farmers $1.25 billion to settle discrimination allegations against the government, the Obama Administration is promoting another huge minority cash giveaway for Hispanic and women farmers.
It’s part of the president’s continued efforts to write a new chapter for civil rights and resolve all allegations of past discrimination in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), according to an agency announcement issued this week. Women and Hispanics who feel the government discriminated against them when seeking USDA farm loans are encouraged to apply for cash to make up for Uncle Sam’s wrongdoing.
In all, the agency is allocating $1.33 billion in “compensation” for women and Hispanics in addition to $160 million in “farm debt relief.” Hispanic or women farmers who provide additional proof and meet other requirements can receive a $50,000 reward, according to the USDA announcement. The goal is to ensure that any Hispanic or woman farmer or rancher who alleges discrimination is aware of the money pot, says the USDA official in charge of the program.
To get the word out the feds have launched an impressive bilingual advertising and public relations campaign that includes national outreach tours by top USDA officials as well as Justice Department bigwigs because that agency is sort of overseeing it. The cash giveaway tour was in South Florida this week assuring that there is no filing fee or other costs to claimants who apply for money.
Those who can’t attend the USDA/DOJ outreach rallies can always register online or contact toll free a special Farmer and Rancher Call Center that will mail out a packet. The USDA has also created videos, in English and Spanish, to promote the program and it published a special flyer advertising the administration's latest civil rights reparation project.
Obama Gives Discriminated Hispanic, Women Farmers $1.3 Billion
A year after giving black farmers $1.25 billion to settle discrimination allegations against the government, the Obama Administration is promoting another huge minority cash giveaway for Hispanic and women farmers.
It’s part of the president’s continued efforts to write a new chapter for civil rights and resolve all allegations of past discrimination in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), according to an agency announcement issued this week. Women and Hispanics who feel the government discriminated against them when seeking USDA farm loans are encouraged to apply for cash to make up for Uncle Sam’s wrongdoing.
In all, the agency is allocating $1.33 billion in “compensation” for women and Hispanics in addition to $160 million in “farm debt relief.” Hispanic or women farmers who provide additional proof and meet other requirements can receive a $50,000 reward, according to the USDA announcement. The goal is to ensure that any Hispanic or woman farmer or rancher who alleges discrimination is aware of the money pot, says the USDA official in charge of the program.
To get the word out the feds have launched an impressive bilingual advertising and public relations campaign that includes national outreach tours by top USDA officials as well as Justice Department bigwigs because that agency is sort of overseeing it. The cash giveaway tour was in South Florida this week assuring that there is no filing fee or other costs to claimants who apply for money.
Those who can’t attend the USDA/DOJ outreach rallies can always register online or contact toll free a special Farmer and Rancher Call Center that will mail out a packet. The USDA has also created videos, in English and Spanish, to promote the program and it published a special flyer advertising the administration's latest civil rights reparation project.
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Obama Scrapped President Bush's Missile Defense Plan
We want to show you this excellent article below as it shows the results of how Barry Soetoro came out of the gates. Soetoro jumped onto the scene with his Kenyan attitude and set out to punish the Allies of America. England, Poland, Israel and others would be treated like cast-offs from a failed BET Network TV show. We could go on in analyzing the Regime's outreach to Dictators in Cuba, Iran and Venezuela but the Mass still shows support for Obama? The Racist Democrats and white-guilt ridden Masses support this Regime's attack on our Country and Allies.
The article below was written by by Zbigniew Mazurak.
Obama Administration's missile defense proposal 'simply not credible'
Written by Zbigniew Mazurak
In 2009, the Obama Administration scrapped President Bush's plans for missile defense in Europe in an unprecedented act of capitulation to Russia, thus alienating two allies (Poland and the Czech Republic) with whom Washington had signed missile defense hosting agreements just a year earlier.
At the time, the Administration, including then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, claimed that intelligence data indicated that Iran was now developing short-range instead of long-range ballistic missiles and that therefore the systems envisioned by Bush (a radar in the Czech Republic and 10 Ground Based Interceptors in Poland, also known as "third site elements") were not needed. Instead, Gates and Obama offered the deployment of Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)-capable ships and, in the 2018-2020 timeframe, ground-based SM-3 Block IIB interceptors (which have yet to be developed and constructed) intended to intercept long-range ballistic missiles.
At the time, it was already known that such a plan would be 2 times more costly than the Bush plan and would not offer coverage early enough; Iran already possessed, as of 2009, BM25 Musudan-ri IRBMs capable of reaching all European capitals (including London, Dublin, and Lisbon), and the Obama Administration knew this, as cables published by WikiLeaks reveal. CIA veteran Reza Kahlili confirms this. US intel also says that Iran will have ICBMs capable of reaching the United States by 2015.
Last month, testifying before Congress, Secretary Gates lied further, claiming that execution of the Bush Administration's plan was "never going to happen" because, supposedly, Poland and the Czech Republic refused to sign hosting agreements. But this is a blatant lie. In August 2008, Condoleezza Rice, then Secretary of State, signed the relevant agreements with Poland and the Czech Republic. And no sooner was the ink dry that the Vice Chief of the Russian General Staff, threatened these countries with "100% certain" nuclear attack if the third site elements are built.
But, as a recent Defense Science Board (DSB) report reveals, it is the Obama Admin's plan that is unrealistic and unexecutable. The report is classified and only unclassified portions of it have been released and submitted to Congress. Sen. Richard Shelby has obtained a copy.
The DSB dismisses Obama's plan as "simply not credible", saying that the planned SM-3IIB missiles - which currently don't exist and have yet to be constructed and tested - will not be able to intercept enemy missiles in the boost (earliest) phase of flight, as they are being designed to do. Thus, the Obama Administration has bet European missile defense on a nonexistent missile that will never be able to do its job.
By contrast, Bush wanted to deploy existing, tested, proven Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) mid-course interceptors in Poland, the same kind of missiles that are already stationed in Alaska and California. They intercept missiles in the mid phase of flight.
In any case, Central Europe is so far away from the Middle East that any missiles launched from there could intercept ballistic missiles only in the mid phase - exactly as GBIs are designed to do.
Meanwhile, the Czech Republic is so annoyed by how it's been treated by the Obama Administration that it has refused to cooperate in its new BMD scheme. Even if a Republican Administration takes office after 2012, it will be difficult to regain the Czechs' trust.
And Russia? It's still not satisfied. It wants to see no missile defense systems in Europe, and President Medvedev has threatened a new Cold War and a new arms race (typical Russian bluff, but nonetheless telling) if any such systems are deployed. Obama's arms control chief Ellen Tauscher, a longtime opponent of a strong defense in general and missile defense in particular, is drawing up secret agreements with Russia to drastically limit such systems. And Russia's ambassador has dismissed the potential Iranian threat as nonexistent, at the same time his country is helping to grow that threat.
In short, Obama's missile defense plan is bad news. He has scrapped plans to deploy proven, tested interceptors, revoked signed agreements as if they were worthless pieces of paper, alienated 2 allies, and pushed forward a plan based on nonexisten systems that, as the DSB tells Congress, won't work, thus making the Obama plan "simply not credible."
Therefore, Congress should:
1) 1). Hold hearings on this issue and call on high-ranking Administration officials, as well as independent witnesses, such as former Missile Defense Agency Director LTG Henry Obering (ret.) and think-tank analysts, to testify.
2) 2). Refuse to provide funding for the PAA, or "Phased Adaptive Approach," which the DSB says is "simply not credible".
3) 3). Obligate the Administration, by law, to provide coverage to the US and Europe against all classes of ballistic missiles (not just SRBMs as Gates wanted) using proven, existing systems, as well as the promising systems scrapped in 2009 by Gates.
If If the Administration vetoes such legislation, let it put itself on record as overtly opposing plans to protect America. Then, the American people can vote accordingly.
The article below was written by by Zbigniew Mazurak.
Obama Administration's missile defense proposal 'simply not credible'
Written by Zbigniew Mazurak
In 2009, the Obama Administration scrapped President Bush's plans for missile defense in Europe in an unprecedented act of capitulation to Russia, thus alienating two allies (Poland and the Czech Republic) with whom Washington had signed missile defense hosting agreements just a year earlier.
At the time, the Administration, including then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, claimed that intelligence data indicated that Iran was now developing short-range instead of long-range ballistic missiles and that therefore the systems envisioned by Bush (a radar in the Czech Republic and 10 Ground Based Interceptors in Poland, also known as "third site elements") were not needed. Instead, Gates and Obama offered the deployment of Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)-capable ships and, in the 2018-2020 timeframe, ground-based SM-3 Block IIB interceptors (which have yet to be developed and constructed) intended to intercept long-range ballistic missiles.
At the time, it was already known that such a plan would be 2 times more costly than the Bush plan and would not offer coverage early enough; Iran already possessed, as of 2009, BM25 Musudan-ri IRBMs capable of reaching all European capitals (including London, Dublin, and Lisbon), and the Obama Administration knew this, as cables published by WikiLeaks reveal. CIA veteran Reza Kahlili confirms this. US intel also says that Iran will have ICBMs capable of reaching the United States by 2015.
Last month, testifying before Congress, Secretary Gates lied further, claiming that execution of the Bush Administration's plan was "never going to happen" because, supposedly, Poland and the Czech Republic refused to sign hosting agreements. But this is a blatant lie. In August 2008, Condoleezza Rice, then Secretary of State, signed the relevant agreements with Poland and the Czech Republic. And no sooner was the ink dry that the Vice Chief of the Russian General Staff, threatened these countries with "100% certain" nuclear attack if the third site elements are built.
But, as a recent Defense Science Board (DSB) report reveals, it is the Obama Admin's plan that is unrealistic and unexecutable. The report is classified and only unclassified portions of it have been released and submitted to Congress. Sen. Richard Shelby has obtained a copy.
The DSB dismisses Obama's plan as "simply not credible", saying that the planned SM-3IIB missiles - which currently don't exist and have yet to be constructed and tested - will not be able to intercept enemy missiles in the boost (earliest) phase of flight, as they are being designed to do. Thus, the Obama Administration has bet European missile defense on a nonexistent missile that will never be able to do its job.
By contrast, Bush wanted to deploy existing, tested, proven Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) mid-course interceptors in Poland, the same kind of missiles that are already stationed in Alaska and California. They intercept missiles in the mid phase of flight.
In any case, Central Europe is so far away from the Middle East that any missiles launched from there could intercept ballistic missiles only in the mid phase - exactly as GBIs are designed to do.
Meanwhile, the Czech Republic is so annoyed by how it's been treated by the Obama Administration that it has refused to cooperate in its new BMD scheme. Even if a Republican Administration takes office after 2012, it will be difficult to regain the Czechs' trust.
And Russia? It's still not satisfied. It wants to see no missile defense systems in Europe, and President Medvedev has threatened a new Cold War and a new arms race (typical Russian bluff, but nonetheless telling) if any such systems are deployed. Obama's arms control chief Ellen Tauscher, a longtime opponent of a strong defense in general and missile defense in particular, is drawing up secret agreements with Russia to drastically limit such systems. And Russia's ambassador has dismissed the potential Iranian threat as nonexistent, at the same time his country is helping to grow that threat.
In short, Obama's missile defense plan is bad news. He has scrapped plans to deploy proven, tested interceptors, revoked signed agreements as if they were worthless pieces of paper, alienated 2 allies, and pushed forward a plan based on nonexisten systems that, as the DSB tells Congress, won't work, thus making the Obama plan "simply not credible."
Therefore, Congress should:
1) 1). Hold hearings on this issue and call on high-ranking Administration officials, as well as independent witnesses, such as former Missile Defense Agency Director LTG Henry Obering (ret.) and think-tank analysts, to testify.
2) 2). Refuse to provide funding for the PAA, or "Phased Adaptive Approach," which the DSB says is "simply not credible".
3) 3). Obligate the Administration, by law, to provide coverage to the US and Europe against all classes of ballistic missiles (not just SRBMs as Gates wanted) using proven, existing systems, as well as the promising systems scrapped in 2009 by Gates.
If If the Administration vetoes such legislation, let it put itself on record as overtly opposing plans to protect America. Then, the American people can vote accordingly.
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
racist-reverends,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans
Sunday, July 3, 2011
Marxist Chicago Politics and Democrat Cesspool
Just Business As Usual in the Windy City !
Now that Rahm Emanuel is mayor, and with his close ties to Obama, things could get even worse !
My, My don't we have the highest standards. What a cesspool Chicago politics is.
You can't make up stuff better than this!
Isn't politics grand?
Hurray FOR THE DEMOCRATS! Democrats allow and support Black People who are racists.
Jesse Jackson's Newest Staff Member:
Mel Reynolds
Jesse Jackson has added former Chicago Democrat Congressman Mel to Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll. Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud,
and lies to the Federal Election Commission.
He is more notorious, however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.
This is a first in American politics:
An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate
...won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate
...then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate!
His new job? Ready for this??
YOUTH COUNSELOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?
Now that Rahm Emanuel is mayor, and with his close ties to Obama, things could get even worse !
My, My don't we have the highest standards. What a cesspool Chicago politics is.
You can't make up stuff better than this!
Isn't politics grand?
Hurray FOR THE DEMOCRATS! Democrats allow and support Black People who are racists.
Jesse Jackson's Newest Staff Member:
Mel Reynolds
Jesse Jackson has added former Chicago Democrat Congressman Mel to Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll. Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud,
and lies to the Federal Election Commission.
He is more notorious, however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.
This is a first in American politics:
An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate
...won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate
...then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate!
His new job? Ready for this??
YOUTH COUNSELOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-child-molester,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
racist-reverends,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Babies Born Alive During Abortion Don't Survive BHO
After our Memorial Day break we want to report on the Nazi MSM in South Florida again. The MSM in this Country is just an illegitimate arm of the Community Organizer Leader. How many more times do we have to hear why a certain Republican can't be President over a small or past mistake? When will Barry Soetoro be sent packing for ACORN, Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Racist "Common" Rapper, Khalidi, Odinga or voting to leave a baby in a utility closet to die alone!
Yes Oprah and you despicable Obama supporters, this is a man full of hate for America, Israel and England. Also he has added more to the National Debt, in two years, than the previous 43 Presidents combined! Yet these Anti-American MSM knuckleheads want him reelected.

We have another response from Chuck On The Right Side to the local Newspaper Rag in South Florida.
Dear Editor:
In response to Sidney Shapiro's Saturday Forum column in the Sun-Sentinel (May 28), I think he should stop drinking the Obama Kool-Aid.
He proclaims that Obama's speech on the Middle East was "brilliant rhetoric", but he didn't ask the American people or the Israeli's if they concurred with that assessment. All polls said it was looked upon as a disaster.
The old expression, "he cleaned his clock", should be attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu as he gave our inexperienced, clueless president a history lesson on the Middle East. As an American, I was embarrassed for our country and was made more sympathetic to the plight of our Israeli friends. Sidney should get rid of his rose-colored glasses and face reality. Idol worship is now passe.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Yes Oprah and you despicable Obama supporters, this is a man full of hate for America, Israel and England. Also he has added more to the National Debt, in two years, than the previous 43 Presidents combined! Yet these Anti-American MSM knuckleheads want him reelected.

We have another response from Chuck On The Right Side to the local Newspaper Rag in South Florida.
Dear Editor:
In response to Sidney Shapiro's Saturday Forum column in the Sun-Sentinel (May 28), I think he should stop drinking the Obama Kool-Aid.
He proclaims that Obama's speech on the Middle East was "brilliant rhetoric", but he didn't ask the American people or the Israeli's if they concurred with that assessment. All polls said it was looked upon as a disaster.
The old expression, "he cleaned his clock", should be attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu as he gave our inexperienced, clueless president a history lesson on the Middle East. As an American, I was embarrassed for our country and was made more sympathetic to the plight of our Israeli friends. Sidney should get rid of his rose-colored glasses and face reality. Idol worship is now passe.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Bill-Ayers,
Democrat-Lies,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Holder,
Liberals-Lie,
MSM-Frauds,
Nazi-Democrat,
Nazi-MSM,
Obama-ACORN,
Obamacare,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Racist-Sotomayor,
stop-sharia-law
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Hugo Chavez-lite Demagogue Ollanta Humala
Re: Article in Sun Sentinel
Dear Guillermo Martinez:
Let's hope your advice comes true and the Peruvian people will regain their senses, in the run-off election, and throw their support behind Keiko Fujimori. It would be a disaster for the Peruvians to give up their new found prosperity for a Hugo Chavez-lite demagogue like Ollanta Humala.
Humala will say anything to the electorate, whether true or not, to get their votes, but just like the other Latin "phony dictators" like Ortega, Chavez, Motrales, and Correa, once they get power they will revert to the Socialist - Communist plan book. If that happens in Peru, it will be a disaster for one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America.
Let's hope that common sense prevails in that wonderful country of Peru.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Dear Guillermo Martinez:
Let's hope your advice comes true and the Peruvian people will regain their senses, in the run-off election, and throw their support behind Keiko Fujimori. It would be a disaster for the Peruvians to give up their new found prosperity for a Hugo Chavez-lite demagogue like Ollanta Humala.
Humala will say anything to the electorate, whether true or not, to get their votes, but just like the other Latin "phony dictators" like Ortega, Chavez, Motrales, and Correa, once they get power they will revert to the Socialist - Communist plan book. If that happens in Peru, it will be a disaster for one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America.
Let's hope that common sense prevails in that wonderful country of Peru.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Liberals-Lie,
Race-Baiter,
Racist-Oprah,
racist-reverends,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Stop-Terrorists
Monday, February 21, 2011
Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far
Political Correctness has helped to crumble our society. Some pervert like Wanda Sykes can tell how she wants Rush Limbaugh to die. The Racist Liberals and the so-called President, Obama laughed it up. Yet when a 16 year old white guy says that an odd looking statute “looks Gay”, well Wanda Sykes is there to scold the kid and make fun of his mustache? Double Standard? Liberals have no civility. Liberals have a proclivity for Violence.
Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But Effective! Of course the Media Ignores the truth as the MSM is promoting this slave-owner Regime.
Political Correctness is a movement of speech purification which is meant to remove any objectionable content that unfairly differentiates between the speaker and different subgroups. It is also supposed to change behavior by promoting these subgroups. So the Marxist Liberals us it to attack anyone who speaks out against a Gay Person or so-called Minority. Of course the Marxist Liberals use it to "legally" attack Conservatives.
Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But Effective! Of course the Media Ignores the truth as the MSM is promoting this slave-owner Regime.
Political Correctness is a movement of speech purification which is meant to remove any objectionable content that unfairly differentiates between the speaker and different subgroups. It is also supposed to change behavior by promoting these subgroups. So the Marxist Liberals us it to attack anyone who speaks out against a Gay Person or so-called Minority. Of course the Marxist Liberals use it to "legally" attack Conservatives.
Labels:
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Favorite,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Barbara-Boxer,
Racist-Left,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Left-wing Black Activists Commit Race Attacks
We have a article below from the great WorldNetDaily. I realize this is a longtime ploy of Marxists to simply throw down the Race Card. How many Liberals have encountered a disagreement or fight with a Minority, yet they are not RACISTS? Wrong, the liberals are the Racists and/or they want to help destroy America.
Breitbart to NAACP president: 'Go to hell'
Journalist insists black leaders – not tea partiers – are real 'racists'
By Drew Zahn
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Andrew Breitbart
Internet journalist Andrew Breitbart unleashed a tirade on talk radio yesterday, blasting the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People for its condemnation of tea partiers as "racist," instead charging the NAACP itself with racism and telling its president where he can "go."
"Let me say something a tad newsworthy to the president of the NAACP: You can go to hell," Breitbart said. "I have tapes, a tape, of racism, and it's an NAACP dinner. You want to play with fire? I have evidence of racism, and it's coming from the
NAACP."
Breitbart made the explosive comments on the air with Scott Hennen, who hosts a morning talk show on WZFG 1100 AM in Fargo, N.D.
His comments came in response to a resolution adopted by the 101st annual convention of the NAACP earlier this week, condemning the "racism" of the tea-party movement and claiming it could return the nation to the pre-civil-rights era.
According to a report from KMBC television in Kansas City, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous told his organization's members tea parties must "expel the bigots and racists in your ranks or take the responsibility for them and their actions."
"We will no longer allow you to hide like cowards and hide behind signs that say 'lynch our president' or anyone else," Jealous said.
Specific charges within the NAACP resolution, reports the Kansas City Star, include allegations that tea-party supporters have engaged in "explicitly racist behavior," have "displayed signs and posters intended to degrade people of color generally and President Barack Obama specifically" and have used racial epithets in verbally abusing members of Congress.
Breitbart, however, contends that the tea-party movement is about the president's policies, not his race, and that many of the charges of racist behavior at tea-party rallies are exaggerated. Breitbart has also offered a $100,000 reward for any tangible proof of the epithets that were reportedly launched at black U.S. representatives during a tea-party rally protesting Congress' health-care reform efforts – a bounty no one has yet been able to claim.
"You are manufacturing this in a summer in which the economy is the No. 1 issue affecting blacks and whites in this country," Breitbart said of the NAACP. "This country can ill-afford the schism of race to be exploited the way you are, based upon the false premise of the tea party being racist. … This is absolutely manufactured for political gain."
When Hennen brought up a Washington Times story linking the NAACP to the New Black Panther Party, whose Minister King Samir Shabazz not only escaped federal prosecution for voter intimidation amid much controversy but also called for the killing of "some crackers" and "some of their babies" to gain black freedom from white oppression, Breitbart continued his criticism of the NAACP convention.
"Where is the resolution to condemn the racism coming from the [Black Panthers] and killing cracker babies?" Breitbart asked. "Why is the mainstream media ignoring that story while playing up the nonexistent story of the n-word being hurled at congressmen?"
Breitbart joins many voices objecting to the NAACP's denouncement of racism within the tea-party movement.
"For the NAACP to accuse the tea parties of racism is insulting to the great patriots who have participated in this movement and sadly shows just how out of touch that group is with the American people," Tea Party Express spokesman Levi Russell told Politico. "Some of the most compelling leaders of this movement are of many different races – men and women such as William and Selena Owens, Lloyd Marcus, Kevin Jackson and others.
"The racism accusation by the likes of the NAACP has been proved false time and again. Earlier this year, Democrats smeared tea-party activists by claiming members of the Black Caucus were spit on and called the n-word as they paraded through a crowd of tea partiers," he told the publication. "Their blatant lie was proved false by overwhelming evidence from multiple video cameras that recorded the event."
In a blog posted the day before interviewing Breitbart, Hennen expressed similar sentiments.
"In spite of a coordinated bias by the mainstream media, patriotic Americans continue to assemble throughout the nation in protest of big-government policies threatening to undermine our basic liberties," Hennen writes.
"Maybe you're one of the thousands of participants who showed up at one of the tea parties this summer. Take a look in the mirror; what do you see? A racist? Or do you see an average, hard-working American, concerned about the future of this republic?" he asked. "I've met enough of you at these events to virtually guarantee that it's the latter."
Breitbart to NAACP president: 'Go to hell'
Journalist insists black leaders – not tea partiers – are real 'racists'
By Drew Zahn
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Andrew Breitbart
Internet journalist Andrew Breitbart unleashed a tirade on talk radio yesterday, blasting the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People for its condemnation of tea partiers as "racist," instead charging the NAACP itself with racism and telling its president where he can "go."
"Let me say something a tad newsworthy to the president of the NAACP: You can go to hell," Breitbart said. "I have tapes, a tape, of racism, and it's an NAACP dinner. You want to play with fire? I have evidence of racism, and it's coming from the
NAACP."
Breitbart made the explosive comments on the air with Scott Hennen, who hosts a morning talk show on WZFG 1100 AM in Fargo, N.D.
His comments came in response to a resolution adopted by the 101st annual convention of the NAACP earlier this week, condemning the "racism" of the tea-party movement and claiming it could return the nation to the pre-civil-rights era.
According to a report from KMBC television in Kansas City, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous told his organization's members tea parties must "expel the bigots and racists in your ranks or take the responsibility for them and their actions."
"We will no longer allow you to hide like cowards and hide behind signs that say 'lynch our president' or anyone else," Jealous said.
Specific charges within the NAACP resolution, reports the Kansas City Star, include allegations that tea-party supporters have engaged in "explicitly racist behavior," have "displayed signs and posters intended to degrade people of color generally and President Barack Obama specifically" and have used racial epithets in verbally abusing members of Congress.
Breitbart, however, contends that the tea-party movement is about the president's policies, not his race, and that many of the charges of racist behavior at tea-party rallies are exaggerated. Breitbart has also offered a $100,000 reward for any tangible proof of the epithets that were reportedly launched at black U.S. representatives during a tea-party rally protesting Congress' health-care reform efforts – a bounty no one has yet been able to claim.
"You are manufacturing this in a summer in which the economy is the No. 1 issue affecting blacks and whites in this country," Breitbart said of the NAACP. "This country can ill-afford the schism of race to be exploited the way you are, based upon the false premise of the tea party being racist. … This is absolutely manufactured for political gain."
When Hennen brought up a Washington Times story linking the NAACP to the New Black Panther Party, whose Minister King Samir Shabazz not only escaped federal prosecution for voter intimidation amid much controversy but also called for the killing of "some crackers" and "some of their babies" to gain black freedom from white oppression, Breitbart continued his criticism of the NAACP convention.
"Where is the resolution to condemn the racism coming from the [Black Panthers] and killing cracker babies?" Breitbart asked. "Why is the mainstream media ignoring that story while playing up the nonexistent story of the n-word being hurled at congressmen?"
Breitbart joins many voices objecting to the NAACP's denouncement of racism within the tea-party movement.
"For the NAACP to accuse the tea parties of racism is insulting to the great patriots who have participated in this movement and sadly shows just how out of touch that group is with the American people," Tea Party Express spokesman Levi Russell told Politico. "Some of the most compelling leaders of this movement are of many different races – men and women such as William and Selena Owens, Lloyd Marcus, Kevin Jackson and others.
"The racism accusation by the likes of the NAACP has been proved false time and again. Earlier this year, Democrats smeared tea-party activists by claiming members of the Black Caucus were spit on and called the n-word as they paraded through a crowd of tea partiers," he told the publication. "Their blatant lie was proved false by overwhelming evidence from multiple video cameras that recorded the event."
In a blog posted the day before interviewing Breitbart, Hennen expressed similar sentiments.
"In spite of a coordinated bias by the mainstream media, patriotic Americans continue to assemble throughout the nation in protest of big-government policies threatening to undermine our basic liberties," Hennen writes.
"Maybe you're one of the thousands of participants who showed up at one of the tea parties this summer. Take a look in the mirror; what do you see? A racist? Or do you see an average, hard-working American, concerned about the future of this republic?" he asked. "I've met enough of you at these events to virtually guarantee that it's the latter."
Labels:
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Barbara-Boxer,
Racist-Left,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Failed Policies of Socialism
Dear Doug Lyons (Senior Editorial Writer for the Sun-Sentinel):
Doug, of course, we all would like to see all of our students get a good education, especially the black students and other minorities, but what seems to be the impediment in achieving that goal?
I, as an observer of the passing scene, say that you seem to be correct about the black males who seem to be the one's who do not seem to be getting the education they should be getting. I see, in many of the businesses I frequent around south Florida, that the black females are achieving what the black males should be achieving, namely, getting and keeping a good job. I see many professional looking black females in all kinds of jobs, but very few black males, and being in a "red state" (as you snidely implied) has nothing to do with it. Most of the urban school districts, around the country, with lousy schools are overwhelmingly run by "blue state" mayors and city governments.
Why do black females outperform black males academically? That's the question you should address Doug, not whether the city or state is "red" or "blue". My educated guess would be that the major factor happens to be the absence of a traditional family ( a mother and father together at home) in the black community. A 70% out-of-wedlock birthrate is not a positive statistic. The glorification of sports in place of academics also contributes to the lack of educational excellence among black males. Many black males seem to carry a chip on their shoulder and they denigrate other black males who want to succeed and get a good education by saying that those conscientious students are "acting white". A real insidious put down. In addition, the type of music, that puts down women and authority figures, are not positive factors that are conducive to getting a good education. Also, the grooming habits of the black males (wearing their pants halfway down their butts and dragging on the floor) do not create a climate for learning or for getting a good education. Sloppiness in dress generally fosters an environment for mediocrity Another aspect of the demise of the black youth (mostly males) has been the habit of the black people to vote almost exclusively for Democrats these past 70 years, and still they have not been lifted up socially, educationally, and economically, as a result of that monolithic voting pattern. Capitalism and free enterprise are the means of lifting up the black youth, not the failed policies of Socialism, which the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus espouse.
The "tough love", as espoused by Bill Cosby, is mostly shunned by the likes of the "Rhyming Reverends", Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who put forth the the "philosophy of victimization", mainly to keep many of their followers on the "plantation". The opportunities are available for everyone, including blacks and minorities, but it's up to the individual to take advantage of those opportunities, like Lt.Col.Allen West, now Congressman Allen West (R), has done in his life. That's the role model young blacks should try to emulate, not the Jackson's and the Sharpton's of their community.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Doug, of course, we all would like to see all of our students get a good education, especially the black students and other minorities, but what seems to be the impediment in achieving that goal?
I, as an observer of the passing scene, say that you seem to be correct about the black males who seem to be the one's who do not seem to be getting the education they should be getting. I see, in many of the businesses I frequent around south Florida, that the black females are achieving what the black males should be achieving, namely, getting and keeping a good job. I see many professional looking black females in all kinds of jobs, but very few black males, and being in a "red state" (as you snidely implied) has nothing to do with it. Most of the urban school districts, around the country, with lousy schools are overwhelmingly run by "blue state" mayors and city governments.
Why do black females outperform black males academically? That's the question you should address Doug, not whether the city or state is "red" or "blue". My educated guess would be that the major factor happens to be the absence of a traditional family ( a mother and father together at home) in the black community. A 70% out-of-wedlock birthrate is not a positive statistic. The glorification of sports in place of academics also contributes to the lack of educational excellence among black males. Many black males seem to carry a chip on their shoulder and they denigrate other black males who want to succeed and get a good education by saying that those conscientious students are "acting white". A real insidious put down. In addition, the type of music, that puts down women and authority figures, are not positive factors that are conducive to getting a good education. Also, the grooming habits of the black males (wearing their pants halfway down their butts and dragging on the floor) do not create a climate for learning or for getting a good education. Sloppiness in dress generally fosters an environment for mediocrity Another aspect of the demise of the black youth (mostly males) has been the habit of the black people to vote almost exclusively for Democrats these past 70 years, and still they have not been lifted up socially, educationally, and economically, as a result of that monolithic voting pattern. Capitalism and free enterprise are the means of lifting up the black youth, not the failed policies of Socialism, which the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus espouse.
The "tough love", as espoused by Bill Cosby, is mostly shunned by the likes of the "Rhyming Reverends", Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who put forth the the "philosophy of victimization", mainly to keep many of their followers on the "plantation". The opportunities are available for everyone, including blacks and minorities, but it's up to the individual to take advantage of those opportunities, like Lt.Col.Allen West, now Congressman Allen West (R), has done in his life. That's the role model young blacks should try to emulate, not the Jackson's and the Sharpton's of their community.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Maxine Waters' favorite bank violated its pledge to help the poor
Please read this informative article below on Maxine Waters, the Race charlatan, and financial charlatan. Yet another reason that "We the People" have no trust with the lowlife Democrats. It is and has been about justice for just-us (Black Caucus & Marxist Democrats) for far too long. We must clean house this November!
Portion below Written by Ed Lasky
The Boston bank that is at the center of controversy involving Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who intervened with regulators to protect and reward the bank (her husband had a financial interest in the bank), apparently lied about helping poor people, reports the Boston Globe:
Five years ago this month, Mayor Thomas M. Menino stood with community leaders in Roxbury to hail plans for a new OneUnited branch in the neighborhood. The bank's president pledged to make loans worth hundreds of millions of dollars across Boston, with a special emphasis on low-income borrowers.
OneUnited said it would partner with the city to offer the mortgages to first-time and current homeowners, and provide financial literacy training to residents. "As a child of an inner-city community I can tell you, it doesn't get any better than this,'' the bank's president, Teri Williams, told the crowd that day.
But no loan program ever emerged -- one in a long list of failures by the nation's largest minority-owned bank, which is controlled by Williams and her husband, Kevin Cohee, the bank's chairman.
In recent years, regulators have admonished the bank for poor performance and lavish executive pay, and Cohee himself has had personal run-ins with the law in California. And the bank, despite its diminished role as a community lender, sought and received help from US Representative Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, to secure $12 million in federal funds after the bank lost money on risky investments. Waters now faces House ethics charges in the matter because her husband had a stake in the bank.
The spin that the bank would help the poor acquire housing and jobs was just that: spin. A few dollars trickled out to help some poor people -- but not in Boston, Miami, or Los Angeles, where it opened offices. But large sums did go to a wealthy developers in Massachusetts. Meanwhile, executives rewarded themselves with fancy cars and high salaries. The president had run-ins with the law; a sexual assault allegation (dropped) and a drug charge that was dropped after he agreed to counseling. The plight of the poor was a ruse to ransack.
Quiet a crew that Maxine Waters bent -- actually broke -- the rules to help reward with our money. She should be ashamed, instead of defiant. And Congressman Barney Frank logrolled for her -- did favors to help her while attempting to keep her role hidden. He should be ashamed of himself, as well (let alone for his role in creating the housing crisis by his drive to promote home ownership among those who could not afford it).
Written by Ed Lasky
Portion below Written by Ed Lasky
The Boston bank that is at the center of controversy involving Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who intervened with regulators to protect and reward the bank (her husband had a financial interest in the bank), apparently lied about helping poor people, reports the Boston Globe:
Five years ago this month, Mayor Thomas M. Menino stood with community leaders in Roxbury to hail plans for a new OneUnited branch in the neighborhood. The bank's president pledged to make loans worth hundreds of millions of dollars across Boston, with a special emphasis on low-income borrowers.
OneUnited said it would partner with the city to offer the mortgages to first-time and current homeowners, and provide financial literacy training to residents. "As a child of an inner-city community I can tell you, it doesn't get any better than this,'' the bank's president, Teri Williams, told the crowd that day.
But no loan program ever emerged -- one in a long list of failures by the nation's largest minority-owned bank, which is controlled by Williams and her husband, Kevin Cohee, the bank's chairman.
In recent years, regulators have admonished the bank for poor performance and lavish executive pay, and Cohee himself has had personal run-ins with the law in California. And the bank, despite its diminished role as a community lender, sought and received help from US Representative Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, to secure $12 million in federal funds after the bank lost money on risky investments. Waters now faces House ethics charges in the matter because her husband had a stake in the bank.
The spin that the bank would help the poor acquire housing and jobs was just that: spin. A few dollars trickled out to help some poor people -- but not in Boston, Miami, or Los Angeles, where it opened offices. But large sums did go to a wealthy developers in Massachusetts. Meanwhile, executives rewarded themselves with fancy cars and high salaries. The president had run-ins with the law; a sexual assault allegation (dropped) and a drug charge that was dropped after he agreed to counseling. The plight of the poor was a ruse to ransack.
Quiet a crew that Maxine Waters bent -- actually broke -- the rules to help reward with our money. She should be ashamed, instead of defiant. And Congressman Barney Frank logrolled for her -- did favors to help her while attempting to keep her role hidden. He should be ashamed of himself, as well (let alone for his role in creating the housing crisis by his drive to promote home ownership among those who could not afford it).
Written by Ed Lasky
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Impeach Barry Soetoro Party - San Diego
WOW! Some real Conservatives in California again! I lived there in the 90's and saw Political Correctness (Marxism) destroying the once great State. I have to agree with them, Barry Must Go! Too many reasons to list, but his Cloward Piven act will demolish our economy for years to come.
The first Tea Party dedicated to impeaching the usurper, Barack Obama held in San Diego, August 28, 2010. It may be the first in the nation, as far as we have heard. May there be many more, until the usurper is removed from the White House. Sponsored by Stop Obama Now Group.
Obama a Ventriloquist’s Dummy?
POWERFUL AND FRIGHTENING!
Wall Street Journal Sizes Up Obama - They've Got Him Figured Out!
Please read this Article from the Wall Street Journal - by Eddie Sessions:
"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a kind of make-believe
life in which money was provided and doors were opened because at some point early
on somebody or some group took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White House.
In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry. Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams of My Father" was published in 1995when he was only 34 years old. The "Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself. There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.
His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that might be deemed
controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois legislature to the
Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of having Mayor Daley's
formidable political machine at his disposal.
He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the Capital. How, many must wonder,
was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at the Democrat convention that nominated
John Kerry when virtually no one had ever even heard of him before?
He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.
And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole. And then John McCain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female governor from the very distant state of Alaska . It was a ticket that was reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down to defeat.
The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and now over the man. The venom directed against McCain and, in particular, Palin, was extraordinary.
Now, nearly a full year into his first term, all of those gilded years leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.
Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish away" some terrible realities,
not the least of which is the Islamist intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having gained a foothold in Spain .
The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign "world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really bad intentions.
Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a cakewalk, has
positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in Congress because
in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about his communist ideology,
learned at an early age from family, mentors, college professors, and extreme leftist
friends and colleagues.
Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment about a Boston police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.
He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the battlefield against America . He could even instruct his Attorney General to afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even consider such an obscenity.
And he is a man who could wait three days before having anything to say about the
perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on Americans and then have to elaborate
on his remarks the following day because his first statement was so lame.
The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the Bush administration
or he naively seeks to wish away the truth.
Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and manufactured this pathetic individual's life.
When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth certificate, this man has spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts remain hidden.
We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the dummy is President of the United States of America?"
by Eddie Sessions
Wall Street Journal Sizes Up Obama - They've Got Him Figured Out!
Please read this Article from the Wall Street Journal - by Eddie Sessions:
"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a kind of make-believe
life in which money was provided and doors were opened because at some point early
on somebody or some group took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White House.
In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry. Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams of My Father" was published in 1995when he was only 34 years old. The "Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself. There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.
His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that might be deemed
controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois legislature to the
Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of having Mayor Daley's
formidable political machine at his disposal.
He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the Capital. How, many must wonder,
was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at the Democrat convention that nominated
John Kerry when virtually no one had ever even heard of him before?
He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.
And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole. And then John McCain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female governor from the very distant state of Alaska . It was a ticket that was reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down to defeat.
The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and now over the man. The venom directed against McCain and, in particular, Palin, was extraordinary.
Now, nearly a full year into his first term, all of those gilded years leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.
Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish away" some terrible realities,
not the least of which is the Islamist intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having gained a foothold in Spain .
The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign "world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really bad intentions.
Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a cakewalk, has
positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in Congress because
in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about his communist ideology,
learned at an early age from family, mentors, college professors, and extreme leftist
friends and colleagues.
Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment about a Boston police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.
He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the battlefield against America . He could even instruct his Attorney General to afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even consider such an obscenity.
And he is a man who could wait three days before having anything to say about the
perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on Americans and then have to elaborate
on his remarks the following day because his first statement was so lame.
The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the Bush administration
or he naively seeks to wish away the truth.
Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and manufactured this pathetic individual's life.
When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth certificate, this man has spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts remain hidden.
We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the dummy is President of the United States of America?"
by Eddie Sessions
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Liberals-Lie,
Race-Baiter,
Racist-Oprah,
racist-reverends,
sharia-law,
Shoe-Bomb-Terrorist,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Terrorist
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Barry Calls Us MONGRELS!
These Obama FOLKS have zero class. The so-called male obama runs around with a chip on his shoulder and blames Bush for all the problems in the 57 States!
His wife demands Americans eat what she wants us to eat meanwhile she shoves everything under the sun down her large orifice.
So now after Barry Soetoro apologizes for America to every lowlife Dictator and Commie, Barry then calls us Mongrels? Zero Class! Zippo!
This portion below is by Sam Youngman
Obama calls African-Americans a ‘mongrel people’
President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are “sort of a mongrel people.”
The president appeared on ABC’s morning talk show “The View” Thursday, where he talked about the forced resignation of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod, his experience with race and his roots.
When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: "We are sort of a mongrel people."
"I mean we're all kinds of mixed up," Obama said. "That's actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it."
The president did not appear to be making an inflammatory remark with his statement. The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as "of mixed breed, nature, or origin," according to dictionary.com.
The race debate was reignited after Sherrod’s firing. Obama also addressed the issue in his speech to the National Urban League 100th Anniversary Convention in Washington on Thursday morning.
But in his interview on “The View,” which was taped Wednesday but aired Thursday, the president said the Sherrod story was prompted when the media "generated a phony controversy."
"A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration," he said.
By Sam Youngman
His wife demands Americans eat what she wants us to eat meanwhile she shoves everything under the sun down her large orifice.
So now after Barry Soetoro apologizes for America to every lowlife Dictator and Commie, Barry then calls us Mongrels? Zero Class! Zippo!
This portion below is by Sam Youngman
Obama calls African-Americans a ‘mongrel people’
President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are “sort of a mongrel people.”
The president appeared on ABC’s morning talk show “The View” Thursday, where he talked about the forced resignation of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod, his experience with race and his roots.
When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: "We are sort of a mongrel people."
"I mean we're all kinds of mixed up," Obama said. "That's actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it."
The president did not appear to be making an inflammatory remark with his statement. The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as "of mixed breed, nature, or origin," according to dictionary.com.
The race debate was reignited after Sherrod’s firing. Obama also addressed the issue in his speech to the National Urban League 100th Anniversary Convention in Washington on Thursday morning.
But in his interview on “The View,” which was taped Wednesday but aired Thursday, the president said the Sherrod story was prompted when the media "generated a phony controversy."
"A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration," he said.
By Sam Youngman
Monday, August 2, 2010
Marxists & Black Liberation Theology Thuggery
When will the slow thinking Americans who lean left wake up? Lachlan Markay has a very insightful article below on the Left attacking Conservatives and Tea Party Members. The Left shouts "Racist" and the fringe Media gives them some running room with the lies. The Left can re-write history all they want. We know they started the KKK, wanted to keep Slaves and still try and keep the poor under their thumb. Even currently we have the Left spouting all the Racist verbiage. Lowlife Sherrods, Biden, Reid, Maxine Waters , Barbara Boxer, Sheila Jackson Jess Lee and on and on!
Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But 'Effective,' Media Ignore
By Lachlan Markay
What will it take for the media to acknowledge that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, and that liberals have smeared it as such in a naked politicization of race relations? How about a lefty activist admitting just that.
UPenn professor Mary Frances Berry, a leader of the "far-left black political scene," as NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield wrote, penned this astonishing email to Politico, published on July 20:
Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.
Dick Armey could not have said it better.
The strategy is, of course, reprehensible, but members of the Tea Party movement have long suspected that accusations of racism were nothing more than elements of a political ploy motivated by a fear that the movement's influence could spell disaster for Democrats in November and beyond.
Rather than discuss the issues, these smear artists allege racism since it immediately puts political opponents on the defensive, preventing them from pushing lines of argument to which most Americans are sympathetic.
That Berry specifically mentioned joblessness as an issue that can be dodged by crying racism demonstrates just how desperate liberals are to avoid discussing the still-sagging economy. It's a losing issue for Democrats, and their supporters know it. By dubbing the critics of Democratic economic policy racists, they can avoid discussion of the failures of their own policies.
Coverage of this outrageous statement from the mainstream media: practically zero. Hannity has mentioned it a couple times, and Politico, of course, has acknowledged it.
But almost every other major news outlet - ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, Newsweek, Time - has completely ignored the statement, according to a Nexis search. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund mentioned it on CBS's Face the Nation and on CNN Newsroom, but neither outlet covered the topic on its own, or followed up on Fund's statements. Mary Matalin mentioned it on the Situation Room, but once again, it took a conservative guest for the statement to even be acknowledged, and no one followed up.
And of course, the same media outlets ignoring this story have frequently trumpeted accusations of racism directed at the Tea Party as fact. The most notorious example - the alleged racial slurs shouted at Members of Congress before the health care vote - has even recently been treated as fact, despite the complete absence of evidence supporting the accusation.
Maybe Berry's statement will help convince these journalists that they are aiding and abetting not only political character assassination against an organic, Jeffersonian movement, but that they are in fact aiding the degradation of American race relations, as R. Dozier Gray, spokesman for the black conservative group Project 21 notes:
This willful and purposeful use of the race card for nothing more than political gain is toxic to race relations, and Mary Frances Berry must know that. But she evidently does not care. Based on her comment, political posturing takes primacy over whatever real issues regarding race that she might pretend are her calling cards. I have seen this all before. I find it shameful.
—Lachlan Markay is an associate with Dialog New Media
Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But 'Effective,' Media Ignore
By Lachlan Markay
What will it take for the media to acknowledge that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, and that liberals have smeared it as such in a naked politicization of race relations? How about a lefty activist admitting just that.
UPenn professor Mary Frances Berry, a leader of the "far-left black political scene," as NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield wrote, penned this astonishing email to Politico, published on July 20:
Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.
Dick Armey could not have said it better.
The strategy is, of course, reprehensible, but members of the Tea Party movement have long suspected that accusations of racism were nothing more than elements of a political ploy motivated by a fear that the movement's influence could spell disaster for Democrats in November and beyond.
Rather than discuss the issues, these smear artists allege racism since it immediately puts political opponents on the defensive, preventing them from pushing lines of argument to which most Americans are sympathetic.
That Berry specifically mentioned joblessness as an issue that can be dodged by crying racism demonstrates just how desperate liberals are to avoid discussing the still-sagging economy. It's a losing issue for Democrats, and their supporters know it. By dubbing the critics of Democratic economic policy racists, they can avoid discussion of the failures of their own policies.
Coverage of this outrageous statement from the mainstream media: practically zero. Hannity has mentioned it a couple times, and Politico, of course, has acknowledged it.
But almost every other major news outlet - ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, Newsweek, Time - has completely ignored the statement, according to a Nexis search. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund mentioned it on CBS's Face the Nation and on CNN Newsroom, but neither outlet covered the topic on its own, or followed up on Fund's statements. Mary Matalin mentioned it on the Situation Room, but once again, it took a conservative guest for the statement to even be acknowledged, and no one followed up.
And of course, the same media outlets ignoring this story have frequently trumpeted accusations of racism directed at the Tea Party as fact. The most notorious example - the alleged racial slurs shouted at Members of Congress before the health care vote - has even recently been treated as fact, despite the complete absence of evidence supporting the accusation.
Maybe Berry's statement will help convince these journalists that they are aiding and abetting not only political character assassination against an organic, Jeffersonian movement, but that they are in fact aiding the degradation of American race relations, as R. Dozier Gray, spokesman for the black conservative group Project 21 notes:
This willful and purposeful use of the race card for nothing more than political gain is toxic to race relations, and Mary Frances Berry must know that. But she evidently does not care. Based on her comment, political posturing takes primacy over whatever real issues regarding race that she might pretend are her calling cards. I have seen this all before. I find it shameful.
—Lachlan Markay is an associate with Dialog New Media
Labels:
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Favorite,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Barbara-Boxer,
Racist-Left,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism
Sunday, July 25, 2010
The Regime Looked at Race of Car Dealers For Closures
Apparently we are better off with a BLACK President. Isn't that what Radical Shirley Sherrod said? Ahh, but she is not a Racist. Her comments were taken out of context. Just like this lowlife shiela jackson lee calling Tea Party members, Racists and members of the KKK. Obama has destroyed Race Relations in America. George Bush did more for Race Relations than Barry Soetoro could ever hope to do.
Please read the eye-opening article below by William Tate. It looks very much like Barry, Coward Holder and their crew of Thugs are stomping Race Relations and America at the same time.
Race Played Role in Obama Car Dealer Closures
By William Tate
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
[D]ealerships were retained because they were recently appointed, were key wholesale parts dealers, or were minority- or woman-owned dealerships. [Emphasis added.]
Thus, to meet numbers forced on them by the Obama administration, General Motors and Chrysler were forced to shutter other, potentially more viable, dealerships. The livelihood of potentially tens of thousands of families was thus eliminated simply because their dealerships were not minority- or woman-owned.
As has been widely reported, the Inspector General's study skewered the Obama Gang for strong-arming the companies into closing 2,000 dealerships, costing an estimated 100,000 people their jobs during a recession.
But the news media has ignored key elements of Barofsky's report -- elements that are far more damaging, if possible, to Obama. As we reported earlier in the week, a top Obama official, manufacturing czar and "Auto Team" leader Ron Bloom admitted that the dealerships could have been kept open, saving those jobs, "but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President's mandate for 'shared sacrifice.'"
Barofsky says the administration insisted on the closings even though a GM official told him
that GM would usually save 'not one damn cent' by closing any particular dealership. ... Furthermore, a GM official stated that removing a dealership from the network does not save money for GM -- it might even cost GM money -- and that savings cannot be attributed or assigned to any one dealership.
And a reading of the IG's study makes plain that some dealership closings forced by the administration were based largely on politics.
The report is highly critical of how dealerships were selected for closure, or termination. Barofsky notes that
experts said that while metro areas were oversaturated with GM and Chrysler dealerships and reductions were needed in these areas, this was not the case in rural areas where GM and Chrysler had an advantage over their import competitors. [...]
Although sales volume in small towns may be lower, the cost of operating dealerships in small towns is lower as well. In addition, closing dealerships in small towns could ruin the "historic relationship" that GM has had with residents in small towns and force buyers to drive to metro areas, where there are more competitors. In the worst case, the loss of market share in small and medium-sized markets could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler, the (the Center for Automotive Research) representative said. Representatives from the National Automobile Dealers Association also concurred that dealership terminations would cause GM and Chrysler to lose market share in rural areas. [Emphasis added.]
Nevertheless, as Barofsky notes, "ultimately close to half of all of the GM dealerships identified for termination were in rural areas."
That is where raw, hard, sewage-filled Chicago politics came into play.
Records indicate that in 2008, Obama lost the vote totals in the nation's 1,300 rural counties by nearly 80%.
The Obama administration's insistence on radical numbers of closures ended up shuttering dealerships in those rural areas disproportionately, while dealerships and jobs in metro areas -- Obama's geographical base -- were left open.
Additionally, it has been widely theorized that dealers targeted for closure as a result of Obama's interference were predominantly those who donated campaign contributions to Republicans. Although evidence to date is largely anecdotal, given what we've already reported about the Obama administration's handling of the auto bailout, such speculation does have considerable grounds for support.
While that last point is leaves room for debate, the details contained in the Barofsky report are not. As Barofsky points out, the Obama administration was given an advance copy, and "Treasury [the Obama Treasury Department] might not agree with how the audit's conclusions portray the Auto Team's decision making or with the lessons that SIGTARP has drawn from those facts, but it should be made clear that Treasury has not challenged the essential underlying facts upon which those conclusions are based."
Included among those undisputed facts:
-"[D]ealerships were retained because they were ... minority- or woman-owned dealerships";
-Thousands of jobs were lost, unnecessarily, due specifically to Obama's "mandate for shared sacrifice";
-A disproportionate number of Obama-forced closings were of rural dealerships, in areas unfriendly to Obama, even though such closures could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler.
The media, of course, remain mute about these serious allegations in the Barofsky report. They have limited their coverage to the job loss numbers and tried to place the blame on Treasury Secretary Turbo-Tax Tim Geithner.
For now.
Before long, we'll be reading that it was somehow Bush's fault.
William Tate is an award-winning journalist and author.
Please read the eye-opening article below by William Tate. It looks very much like Barry, Coward Holder and their crew of Thugs are stomping Race Relations and America at the same time.
Race Played Role in Obama Car Dealer Closures
By William Tate
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
[D]ealerships were retained because they were recently appointed, were key wholesale parts dealers, or were minority- or woman-owned dealerships. [Emphasis added.]
Thus, to meet numbers forced on them by the Obama administration, General Motors and Chrysler were forced to shutter other, potentially more viable, dealerships. The livelihood of potentially tens of thousands of families was thus eliminated simply because their dealerships were not minority- or woman-owned.
As has been widely reported, the Inspector General's study skewered the Obama Gang for strong-arming the companies into closing 2,000 dealerships, costing an estimated 100,000 people their jobs during a recession.
But the news media has ignored key elements of Barofsky's report -- elements that are far more damaging, if possible, to Obama. As we reported earlier in the week, a top Obama official, manufacturing czar and "Auto Team" leader Ron Bloom admitted that the dealerships could have been kept open, saving those jobs, "but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President's mandate for 'shared sacrifice.'"
Barofsky says the administration insisted on the closings even though a GM official told him
that GM would usually save 'not one damn cent' by closing any particular dealership. ... Furthermore, a GM official stated that removing a dealership from the network does not save money for GM -- it might even cost GM money -- and that savings cannot be attributed or assigned to any one dealership.
And a reading of the IG's study makes plain that some dealership closings forced by the administration were based largely on politics.
The report is highly critical of how dealerships were selected for closure, or termination. Barofsky notes that
experts said that while metro areas were oversaturated with GM and Chrysler dealerships and reductions were needed in these areas, this was not the case in rural areas where GM and Chrysler had an advantage over their import competitors. [...]
Although sales volume in small towns may be lower, the cost of operating dealerships in small towns is lower as well. In addition, closing dealerships in small towns could ruin the "historic relationship" that GM has had with residents in small towns and force buyers to drive to metro areas, where there are more competitors. In the worst case, the loss of market share in small and medium-sized markets could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler, the (the Center for Automotive Research) representative said. Representatives from the National Automobile Dealers Association also concurred that dealership terminations would cause GM and Chrysler to lose market share in rural areas. [Emphasis added.]
Nevertheless, as Barofsky notes, "ultimately close to half of all of the GM dealerships identified for termination were in rural areas."
That is where raw, hard, sewage-filled Chicago politics came into play.
Records indicate that in 2008, Obama lost the vote totals in the nation's 1,300 rural counties by nearly 80%.
The Obama administration's insistence on radical numbers of closures ended up shuttering dealerships in those rural areas disproportionately, while dealerships and jobs in metro areas -- Obama's geographical base -- were left open.
Additionally, it has been widely theorized that dealers targeted for closure as a result of Obama's interference were predominantly those who donated campaign contributions to Republicans. Although evidence to date is largely anecdotal, given what we've already reported about the Obama administration's handling of the auto bailout, such speculation does have considerable grounds for support.
While that last point is leaves room for debate, the details contained in the Barofsky report are not. As Barofsky points out, the Obama administration was given an advance copy, and "Treasury [the Obama Treasury Department] might not agree with how the audit's conclusions portray the Auto Team's decision making or with the lessons that SIGTARP has drawn from those facts, but it should be made clear that Treasury has not challenged the essential underlying facts upon which those conclusions are based."
Included among those undisputed facts:
-"[D]ealerships were retained because they were ... minority- or woman-owned dealerships";
-Thousands of jobs were lost, unnecessarily, due specifically to Obama's "mandate for shared sacrifice";
-A disproportionate number of Obama-forced closings were of rural dealerships, in areas unfriendly to Obama, even though such closures could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler.
The media, of course, remain mute about these serious allegations in the Barofsky report. They have limited their coverage to the job loss numbers and tried to place the blame on Treasury Secretary Turbo-Tax Tim Geithner.
For now.
Before long, we'll be reading that it was somehow Bush's fault.
William Tate is an award-winning journalist and author.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Friday, June 18, 2010
Oprah Winfrey's Racist Comments! She supports Barry!
This is a short video on Radical Oprah. Her goal growing up was to have "White Folks" work for her. Oprah has "Blood On Her Hands" as she knew darn well that Barry Soetoro went to that Racist Church. Oprah still promotes Barry Soetoro and his racist wife.
I would love to see the numbers on how Oprah became rich. I would bet when Oprah started on a young Chubby Girl (Michelle Obama's words) that Oprah's main audience was White women. The true Oprah came out after she took the money from others and now she can be the Racist she always wanted to be.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Race-Baiter,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Hating Whitey Makes Unexpected Comeback
Written by Kyle-Anne Shiver
Here we are only nine months into the ubiquitously proclaimed "post-racial presidency," and all that promised harmony among the races has disappeared faster than a Chicago minute. All it took for addled minds to conjure shadows of racism behind every whitey tree in the whole American forest were voices raised in dissent over the President's far-left policies.
No sooner had congress' summer recess begun -- without the President's hoped-for passage of Obamacare -- than the racist cries began their assent. Nancy Pelosi threw down the "swastika" gauntlet aimed at townhall attendees, which essentially tarred those citizens with white-supremacy slander. In early August an African-American MSNBC newsman actually declared that the word, "socialist," being used to define Obama policies, was a new "code word" for "N**ger."
Then, Joe Wilson's impolite, but factually accurate blurt of "You lie," aimed at the President's claim regarding illegal alien coverage in the healthcare bill, was hailed as racially motivated by liberals at every level. Maureen Dowd penned a wicked screed, swearing she heard Wilson use the word, "Boy," even though no one else did - not even the recording devices. Jimmy Carter doddered forth with his feeble opinion in public, concluding that of course, the outpouring dissent had to be racist. Even Bill Cosby chimed in on the so-called white-racist motivations.
Interestingly enough, before the election, far-left feminist icon, Erica Jong, gave an interview to the Italian press, details of which were reported by the U.K. Telegraph. Jong was taking daily doses of Valium, she said, just to deal with her "pre-election anxiety." If Obama were not elected, she contended, then it would start a "second civil war" and "blood would run in the streets." Jong confided that her writer friends were equally traumatized, that Naomi Wolf was calling her every day, that Ken Follett was "extremely worried" and that Jane Fonda had sent her an email claiming that she "cried all night and can't cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves."
Well, we had the election. White America came through. Now, where's all that absolution, honey?
From anyone's pre-election calculations, an Obama presidency held the promise of relieving America's white citizens of their centuries-long guilt over slavery and civil-rights injustices. Such, however, has not been at all the case and hating whitey is making an unexpected comeback.
There was President Obama's own "teaching moment" on race wherein he reminded us we are still a racist nation where white police officers act "stupidly" against black professor-types just because of the color of their skin. Even the beer-fest afterward left divisive hard feelings and rancor among unjustly accused police officers.
Last week we saw the racist fires stoked against Rush Limbaugh for the "crime" of wishing to purchase part ownership in the St. Louis Rams. Media outlets from coast to coast used false and slanderous quotes to justify the rhetorical lynching of Limbaugh. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both with more than a few anti-Semitic slurs in their pasts, blasted Limbaugh with false racist charges. An MSNBC contributor remarked that many NFL players had said they wouldn't play for a team owned by Limbaugh because he "would just love to say he owned a plantation full of black men."
But the real cake-taker in this poisonous concoction is the proclamation by Louis Farrakhan in Memphis this week. Farrakhan spoke to a hall full of people who were gathered to celebrate the 14th anniversary of his Million Man March (attended by Barack Obama). This week he warned his Nation of Islam followers not to "become complacent" because of the election of the first black president. Speaking of Obama's election, Farrakhan said "This can pacify you and lull you to sleep in a dangerous time, making you think that we live in a post-racial America-when the opposite is true."
Now, I'm not one generally inclined to agree with the audaciously Hitler-celebrating head of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan. But on the matter of a post-racial America he would seem to be nailing it. Anyone still believing in the promise of Barack Obama bringing racial peace, harmony and Christian forgiveness to White America might be suffering from a severe case of willful blindness.
When every utterance of disagreement with a president is framed as bigotry and racism, then the old black separatists' call to hate whitey has made a sure comeback and there isn't a thing Christian about it.
In fact, it would seem a very Jeremiah Wright inspired phenomenon. Lest we forget, Jeremiah Wright bestowed the lifetime service award from his church on Louis Farrakhan. Barack Obama seems to have soaked up a whole lot more from Wright and Farrakhan than he let on during the campaign. If the President is not stoking the resurgence of racial hatred, he certainly has done nothing substantial to stop it either.
Perhaps we should have paid a bit more heed to those racist associations of Barack Obama's, because in the infamous words of Spike Lee's Malcolm X, it certainly appears we whitey Americans have been utterly and thoroughly "bamboozled."
Written by Kyle-Anne Shiver
Here we are only nine months into the ubiquitously proclaimed "post-racial presidency," and all that promised harmony among the races has disappeared faster than a Chicago minute. All it took for addled minds to conjure shadows of racism behind every whitey tree in the whole American forest were voices raised in dissent over the President's far-left policies.
No sooner had congress' summer recess begun -- without the President's hoped-for passage of Obamacare -- than the racist cries began their assent. Nancy Pelosi threw down the "swastika" gauntlet aimed at townhall attendees, which essentially tarred those citizens with white-supremacy slander. In early August an African-American MSNBC newsman actually declared that the word, "socialist," being used to define Obama policies, was a new "code word" for "N**ger."
Then, Joe Wilson's impolite, but factually accurate blurt of "You lie," aimed at the President's claim regarding illegal alien coverage in the healthcare bill, was hailed as racially motivated by liberals at every level. Maureen Dowd penned a wicked screed, swearing she heard Wilson use the word, "Boy," even though no one else did - not even the recording devices. Jimmy Carter doddered forth with his feeble opinion in public, concluding that of course, the outpouring dissent had to be racist. Even Bill Cosby chimed in on the so-called white-racist motivations.
Interestingly enough, before the election, far-left feminist icon, Erica Jong, gave an interview to the Italian press, details of which were reported by the U.K. Telegraph. Jong was taking daily doses of Valium, she said, just to deal with her "pre-election anxiety." If Obama were not elected, she contended, then it would start a "second civil war" and "blood would run in the streets." Jong confided that her writer friends were equally traumatized, that Naomi Wolf was calling her every day, that Ken Follett was "extremely worried" and that Jane Fonda had sent her an email claiming that she "cried all night and can't cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves."
Well, we had the election. White America came through. Now, where's all that absolution, honey?
From anyone's pre-election calculations, an Obama presidency held the promise of relieving America's white citizens of their centuries-long guilt over slavery and civil-rights injustices. Such, however, has not been at all the case and hating whitey is making an unexpected comeback.
There was President Obama's own "teaching moment" on race wherein he reminded us we are still a racist nation where white police officers act "stupidly" against black professor-types just because of the color of their skin. Even the beer-fest afterward left divisive hard feelings and rancor among unjustly accused police officers.
Last week we saw the racist fires stoked against Rush Limbaugh for the "crime" of wishing to purchase part ownership in the St. Louis Rams. Media outlets from coast to coast used false and slanderous quotes to justify the rhetorical lynching of Limbaugh. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both with more than a few anti-Semitic slurs in their pasts, blasted Limbaugh with false racist charges. An MSNBC contributor remarked that many NFL players had said they wouldn't play for a team owned by Limbaugh because he "would just love to say he owned a plantation full of black men."
But the real cake-taker in this poisonous concoction is the proclamation by Louis Farrakhan in Memphis this week. Farrakhan spoke to a hall full of people who were gathered to celebrate the 14th anniversary of his Million Man March (attended by Barack Obama). This week he warned his Nation of Islam followers not to "become complacent" because of the election of the first black president. Speaking of Obama's election, Farrakhan said "This can pacify you and lull you to sleep in a dangerous time, making you think that we live in a post-racial America-when the opposite is true."
Now, I'm not one generally inclined to agree with the audaciously Hitler-celebrating head of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan. But on the matter of a post-racial America he would seem to be nailing it. Anyone still believing in the promise of Barack Obama bringing racial peace, harmony and Christian forgiveness to White America might be suffering from a severe case of willful blindness.
When every utterance of disagreement with a president is framed as bigotry and racism, then the old black separatists' call to hate whitey has made a sure comeback and there isn't a thing Christian about it.
In fact, it would seem a very Jeremiah Wright inspired phenomenon. Lest we forget, Jeremiah Wright bestowed the lifetime service award from his church on Louis Farrakhan. Barack Obama seems to have soaked up a whole lot more from Wright and Farrakhan than he let on during the campaign. If the President is not stoking the resurgence of racial hatred, he certainly has done nothing substantial to stop it either.
Perhaps we should have paid a bit more heed to those racist associations of Barack Obama's, because in the infamous words of Spike Lee's Malcolm X, it certainly appears we whitey Americans have been utterly and thoroughly "bamboozled."
Written by Kyle-Anne Shiver
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)