Showing posts with label stop-sharia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stop-sharia. Show all posts
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Chinese Chutzpah
Don’tcha just love to be lectured by those renowned practitioners of Human Rights, the Chinese, on how we Americans are such practitioners of Human Wrongs?
Now Folks, that’s what I call, ‘Chinese Chutzpah’.
MORT KUFF with more MORT’s meanderings HERE
Labels:
China,
Chutzpah,
MORTs-Meanderings,
Radical-Islam,
re-education-camps,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
torture
Monday, March 12, 2012
United States Constitution Forever
Labels:
Stop-Political-Correctness,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Stop-Terrorists
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Hezbollah Occupied Territory in America
All those supporters of Barry and his Libya and Egypt interventions will be happy. Yes the Muslim Brotherhood is getting stronger in those areas with help from Barry Soetoro. These Terrorists hate us yet the Rev. Wright protegee is not helping the USA. I always ask "What will the Liberal Women do when Sharia Law has them riding in the trunk of cars and covering their bodies with Tents"?
The article below is from the great writer Debbie Schlussel.
Hat tip to Mr. I
Angola Gets Rid of Its Hezbollah Muslims; When Will We?
By Debbie Schlussel
As you know from reading this site, entire Michigan cities, including Dearbornistan and Dearbornistan Heights, are Hezbollah-occupied territory. The large populations of Hezbollah-supporting Shi’ite Muslims are engaged in money-laundering, phony charities, and other financial and moral support to Hezbollah, the terrorist group that murdered over 300 U.S. Marines and civilians in barracks and Embassy bombings in Beirut and worked with Al-Qaeda to murder many more Americans. But the country of Angola knows how to deal with them.
Contrast Angola’s actions with those of our own officials who are in bed with Hezbollah’s Shi’ites, here in America.
Angola on Tuesday expelled 140 foreign nationals, including 16 Lebanese, on suspicions of terrorism and money laundering, a government official said.
“These foreigners were expelled from Angola because of their illegal status and for money laundering and for terrorism,” said Fretas Neto, who heads Angola’s foreign migration office.The action was taken, he explained, “to safeguard the national interest and guarantee the internal security of the Angolan state.”
Police also probed four other Lebanese nationals and plans to expel them shortly, Neto said.
“They will be banned from the country for a period of more than 20 years,” he added.
Since a protracted civil war ended in 2002, Angola has attracted a substantial number of foreigners looking to capitalise on an economic boom fuelled by the flourishing oil industry and the diamond trade.
There are several Lebanese-owned businesses in the capital Luanda, mainly in the import-export sector.
And those businesses are all funding Hezbollah. Bet on it.
That’s how you deal with them. You deport them. Sadly, the way America deals with ‘em is to hold Ramadan Iftar dinners and monthly “dialogue” for them and to give them millions of dollars in government financing for their welfare agencies, which attracts more and more of them to this country to milk the system and suck us dry. And they are laughing at us all the way to the bank . . . and the terrorist-financing hawala.
Alhamdillullah [praise allah].
The article below is from the great writer Debbie Schlussel.
Hat tip to Mr. I
Angola Gets Rid of Its Hezbollah Muslims; When Will We?
By Debbie Schlussel
As you know from reading this site, entire Michigan cities, including Dearbornistan and Dearbornistan Heights, are Hezbollah-occupied territory. The large populations of Hezbollah-supporting Shi’ite Muslims are engaged in money-laundering, phony charities, and other financial and moral support to Hezbollah, the terrorist group that murdered over 300 U.S. Marines and civilians in barracks and Embassy bombings in Beirut and worked with Al-Qaeda to murder many more Americans. But the country of Angola knows how to deal with them.
Contrast Angola’s actions with those of our own officials who are in bed with Hezbollah’s Shi’ites, here in America.
Angola on Tuesday expelled 140 foreign nationals, including 16 Lebanese, on suspicions of terrorism and money laundering, a government official said.
“These foreigners were expelled from Angola because of their illegal status and for money laundering and for terrorism,” said Fretas Neto, who heads Angola’s foreign migration office.The action was taken, he explained, “to safeguard the national interest and guarantee the internal security of the Angolan state.”
Police also probed four other Lebanese nationals and plans to expel them shortly, Neto said.
“They will be banned from the country for a period of more than 20 years,” he added.
Since a protracted civil war ended in 2002, Angola has attracted a substantial number of foreigners looking to capitalise on an economic boom fuelled by the flourishing oil industry and the diamond trade.
There are several Lebanese-owned businesses in the capital Luanda, mainly in the import-export sector.
And those businesses are all funding Hezbollah. Bet on it.
That’s how you deal with them. You deport them. Sadly, the way America deals with ‘em is to hold Ramadan Iftar dinners and monthly “dialogue” for them and to give them millions of dollars in government financing for their welfare agencies, which attracts more and more of them to this country to milk the system and suck us dry. And they are laughing at us all the way to the bank . . . and the terrorist-financing hawala.
Alhamdillullah [praise allah].
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Why do the Left Wingers Hate Babies
Dear Rachel Patron:
Wrong again Rachel. That's quite a stretch to equate the fictitious figure of 15 million starving children with abortion. What has one got to do with another except as just a figment of your imagination?
Why is it that so many women past the child-bearing years, like yourself, are the most staunch supporters of abortion, like that is the most important issue in our lives? Most polls show that abortion availability is way down the list of important issues facing us a nation.
It seems like the venom regarding abortion, is coming mainly from the loony liberal left and not the anti-abortionists, as they and you claim. Maybe secularists, like yourself Rachel, should tone down your condescending rhetoric, especially in condemning people who have religious values, which you don't seem to have. Where is you tolerance for people with opposite opinions? Shame on you for your intolerance.
Sincerely,
Chuck on the Right Side

Wrong again Rachel. That's quite a stretch to equate the fictitious figure of 15 million starving children with abortion. What has one got to do with another except as just a figment of your imagination?
Why is it that so many women past the child-bearing years, like yourself, are the most staunch supporters of abortion, like that is the most important issue in our lives? Most polls show that abortion availability is way down the list of important issues facing us a nation.
It seems like the venom regarding abortion, is coming mainly from the loony liberal left and not the anti-abortionists, as they and you claim. Maybe secularists, like yourself Rachel, should tone down your condescending rhetoric, especially in condemning people who have religious values, which you don't seem to have. Where is you tolerance for people with opposite opinions? Shame on you for your intolerance.
Sincerely,
Chuck on the Right Side

Labels:
Defund-ACORN,
Defund-UN,
fire-coward-holder,
Mr-I,
Political-Correctness,
Radical-Islam,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Regime,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Message to Obama
In case you missed it, Black Entertainment Network founder, Robert Johnson, had some excellent comments on Fox News Sunday. His comments were directed to President Obama. His most poignant comments:
· “You know I grew up in a family of 10 kids. I was the first one to go to college, and I’ve earned my success. I’ve earned my right to fly private if I choose to do so.
· “…by attacking me is not going to convince me that I should take a bigger hit because I happen to be wealthy.”
· “I’ve tried poor and I tried rich and I like rich better. It doesn’t mean that I am a bad guy.”
· “I didn’t go in to business to create a public policy success for either party, Republican or Democrat. I went in to business to create jobs and opportunity…to create value for myself and my investors. And that’s what the President should be praising, not demagoguing us…”
· And my favorite line of all: “…Warren Buffett says he pays more (taxes) than his secretary. He should pay the secretary more and she will pay more (taxes).”
After a week of listening to the publicity given to such Hollywood morons such as Susan Sarandon, Michael Moore, and Rose Ann Barr, it was great to hear such poignant comments delivered by Mr. Johnson.
Conservative Commentary by Jim Pirretti

· “You know I grew up in a family of 10 kids. I was the first one to go to college, and I’ve earned my success. I’ve earned my right to fly private if I choose to do so.
· “…by attacking me is not going to convince me that I should take a bigger hit because I happen to be wealthy.”
· “I’ve tried poor and I tried rich and I like rich better. It doesn’t mean that I am a bad guy.”
· “I didn’t go in to business to create a public policy success for either party, Republican or Democrat. I went in to business to create jobs and opportunity…to create value for myself and my investors. And that’s what the President should be praising, not demagoguing us…”
· And my favorite line of all: “…Warren Buffett says he pays more (taxes) than his secretary. He should pay the secretary more and she will pay more (taxes).”
After a week of listening to the publicity given to such Hollywood morons such as Susan Sarandon, Michael Moore, and Rose Ann Barr, it was great to hear such poignant comments delivered by Mr. Johnson.
Conservative Commentary by Jim Pirretti

Sunday, June 19, 2011
Democratic Party is The Party of Slavery
The MSM (Mainstream Media) so-called News is just another word for Marxist Leftwing Propaganda. Below we have a counter-attack on the Lamestream Media and their push to rewrite History. The Left wants to claim Republicans were the racist and anti-black with Debbie Bigmouth Schultz claiming Republicans want to go back to Jim Crow days. yet the truth is Democrats are the Party of Slavery, the KKK, Jim Crowe, Al Gore's dad and on and on. The Left Wing Marxists are well on their way to the Fundamental Transformation of America.
This portion below from Chuck On The Right Side.
Dear Doug Lyons:
When you use the word "disproportionate" you imply that black people are, in many instances, incarcerated wrongly as compared to whites. Of course, nothing is perfect including our justice system, but do you really think that most all blacks in jails and prisons are locked up because they are black and not guilty of committing a crime?
Two prominent black pundits and professors, Thomas Sowell and Dr. Walter Williams, have addressed this issue and found your implications to be without merit. Just look through you own paper, the Sun-Sentinel, on a regular basis, and you'll see that a high proportion (as compared to their percent of the population) of crimes are committed by black people (mostly males). What does slavery and Jim Crow laws (long gone) have to do with the high incidence of black on black crime or black on white crime (which is much higher than white on black crime)?
Always placing the blame on others when the blame should be directed at the perpetrators, is the easy way out for people who want to further a social (racial) agenda. Who has forced the births of children to unwed mothers in the black community (at a 70% rate)? Who collects welfare at a rate higher than other groups - you got it , black families.
Victim hood is the curse of the black community by encouraging many to use it as an excuse to excuse their anti-social behavior.
People like you, Doug, should address the obvious problems facing the black community and stop blaming everything and everyone else. America offers an opportunity to everyone who wants to take advantage of it (including many blacks who are highly successful today). Making excuses is the easy way out of solving the problems of the black community. Doug, you should know better.
This portion below from Chuck On The Right Side.
Dear Doug Lyons:
When you use the word "disproportionate" you imply that black people are, in many instances, incarcerated wrongly as compared to whites. Of course, nothing is perfect including our justice system, but do you really think that most all blacks in jails and prisons are locked up because they are black and not guilty of committing a crime?
Two prominent black pundits and professors, Thomas Sowell and Dr. Walter Williams, have addressed this issue and found your implications to be without merit. Just look through you own paper, the Sun-Sentinel, on a regular basis, and you'll see that a high proportion (as compared to their percent of the population) of crimes are committed by black people (mostly males). What does slavery and Jim Crow laws (long gone) have to do with the high incidence of black on black crime or black on white crime (which is much higher than white on black crime)?
Always placing the blame on others when the blame should be directed at the perpetrators, is the easy way out for people who want to further a social (racial) agenda. Who has forced the births of children to unwed mothers in the black community (at a 70% rate)? Who collects welfare at a rate higher than other groups - you got it , black families.
Victim hood is the curse of the black community by encouraging many to use it as an excuse to excuse their anti-social behavior.
People like you, Doug, should address the obvious problems facing the black community and stop blaming everything and everyone else. America offers an opportunity to everyone who wants to take advantage of it (including many blacks who are highly successful today). Making excuses is the easy way out of solving the problems of the black community. Doug, you should know better.
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Fire-Holder,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Political-Correctness,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Regime,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
What Do People Fear Most and Why Drones Support BHO
This is pathetic, but darn funny when you think about it.
Two magazines, Country Living (95.99% white readership) and Ebony /Jet (99.99% black readership) did surveys on....
"WHAT DO PEOPLE FEAR MOST?"
The results were interesting, to say the least...
Country Living magazine's top three answers were:
1. Nuclear war/terrorist attack in U.S
2. Child/spouse dying
3. Terminal illness
Ebony / Jet magazine's top three answers were:
1. Ghosts
2. Dogs
3. Registered mail
No kidding... And these are the people who put Obama over the top.
AND TO GO ALONG WITH ALL OF THIS, I'LL SHARE TWO QUOTES; ONE PITIFUL AND ONE GREAT!
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me, as we change it."-- Barack Obama
United States of America
Born 1776, Died 2008
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota,
points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals - and they vote - then we can say good-bye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of that happening, then by all means, delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
Is anybody REALLY surprised at this?
We also not that American blacks voted for Obama simply for the color of his skin. Many of them did not know anything about this ACORN Marxist. Then we have the disgusting Left Wing Marxist lowlifes who voted for Barry Soetoro because they hope he will shaft this country more royally than anybody else has so far. The self loathing left wing Nazis have always wanted someone to destroy America and with Barry Soetoro, they claim Racism for any criticism of the Community Organizer.
So now we ask what excuse do the Jews have? The black and the radical leftist vote for Soetoro for reasons we can understand. Obama is black, even if his life experience has no relationship to the average American black person or Black Chamber of Commerce member (in fact didn't Obama's Family from Kenya prosper in selling Slaves?) -- none at all. And Obama is a radical, so even the radicals have a reason to vote for him. However, why does Obama keep his favorable standing with the American Jews? It makes no sense for American Jews to support the Left Wing Nazis. Will History repeat itself?
Two magazines, Country Living (95.99% white readership) and Ebony /Jet (99.99% black readership) did surveys on....
"WHAT DO PEOPLE FEAR MOST?"
The results were interesting, to say the least...
Country Living magazine's top three answers were:
1. Nuclear war/terrorist attack in U.S
2. Child/spouse dying
3. Terminal illness
Ebony / Jet magazine's top three answers were:
1. Ghosts
2. Dogs
3. Registered mail
No kidding... And these are the people who put Obama over the top.
AND TO GO ALONG WITH ALL OF THIS, I'LL SHARE TWO QUOTES; ONE PITIFUL AND ONE GREAT!
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me, as we change it."-- Barack Obama
United States of America
Born 1776, Died 2008
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota,
points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals - and they vote - then we can say good-bye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of that happening, then by all means, delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
Is anybody REALLY surprised at this?
We also not that American blacks voted for Obama simply for the color of his skin. Many of them did not know anything about this ACORN Marxist. Then we have the disgusting Left Wing Marxist lowlifes who voted for Barry Soetoro because they hope he will shaft this country more royally than anybody else has so far. The self loathing left wing Nazis have always wanted someone to destroy America and with Barry Soetoro, they claim Racism for any criticism of the Community Organizer.
So now we ask what excuse do the Jews have? The black and the radical leftist vote for Soetoro for reasons we can understand. Obama is black, even if his life experience has no relationship to the average American black person or Black Chamber of Commerce member (in fact didn't Obama's Family from Kenya prosper in selling Slaves?) -- none at all. And Obama is a radical, so even the radicals have a reason to vote for him. However, why does Obama keep his favorable standing with the American Jews? It makes no sense for American Jews to support the Left Wing Nazis. Will History repeat itself?
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Impeach-Barry,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
mosque,
Radical-Islam,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Regime,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, May 16, 2011
Left Wing Marxists Have SOILED The White House
Please pass this on to everyone you know and even to those you don't know.
We must set our youth in the right direction and clean up America from
those Left Wing Marxists who SOILED it! Just like The White House is being SOILED by lowlife racist Rappers and celebrities supporting the Soetoro Regime.
High School Principal
(Every concerned parent should read this. . .)
We watched Dennis Prager of Colorado , along with Sara Palin and Tom Brokaw on TV a couple of weeks ago....what a dynamic, down to earth speaker. Even though Palin and Brokaw were also guest speakers they did little but nod and agree with him. This is the guy that should be running for President in 2012!
A Speech Every American High School Principal Should Give.... By Dennis Prager.
To the students and faculty of our high school:
I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people.
I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.
First, this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships. The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is American.
This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans. If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity, race and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America , one of its three central values -- e pluribus Unum, "from many, one." And this school will be guided by America 's values. This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness.
Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interested in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.
Second, I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America 's citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English -- but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.
Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school.
Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the f-word, you can't speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as "N&%#@*," even when used by one black student to address another black, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene.
Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago -- by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.
Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will be devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue. There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately lucky -- to be alive and to be an American.
Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.
We must set our youth in the right direction and clean up America from
those Left Wing Marxists who SOILED it! Just like The White House is being SOILED by lowlife racist Rappers and celebrities supporting the Soetoro Regime.
High School Principal
(Every concerned parent should read this. . .)
We watched Dennis Prager of Colorado , along with Sara Palin and Tom Brokaw on TV a couple of weeks ago....what a dynamic, down to earth speaker. Even though Palin and Brokaw were also guest speakers they did little but nod and agree with him. This is the guy that should be running for President in 2012!
A Speech Every American High School Principal Should Give.... By Dennis Prager.
To the students and faculty of our high school:
I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people.
I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.
First, this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships. The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is American.
This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans. If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity, race and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America , one of its three central values -- e pluribus Unum, "from many, one." And this school will be guided by America 's values. This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness.
Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interested in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.
Second, I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America 's citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English -- but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.
Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school.
Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the f-word, you can't speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as "N&%#@*," even when used by one black student to address another black, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene.
Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago -- by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.
Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will be devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue. There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately lucky -- to be alive and to be an American.
Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Impeach-Barry,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
mosque,
Radical-Islam,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Regime,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Friday, May 6, 2011
Should Eric Holder Be Fired?
Should a horse thief be hung? Eric Holder does of course deserve to be fired however, prior to that he should be horse-whipped, shot, drawn & quartered and then, tarred & feathered.
He is as ill-equipped to be Attorney General as Obama is to be the President of the United States. Both are third-tier political hacks, parading as practitioners of the laws of our land - one has already been disbarred, the other has yet to be. Neither of them gives a flying fig about either the Constitution of the United States or the fair and equal application of common law to all citizens of this nation. Nor, have either of them the slightest compunction about contorting the traditional parameters of the offices they hold or exceeding their legal boundaries, when it suits their needs and the expediency of the moment.
What Attorney General Janet Reno was to Bill Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder is to Barack Hussein Obama. Both have functioned quite comfortably as legal whores, holding onto their appointed positions solely to do the bidding of the sitting president and to facilitate his every whim by putting a legal imprimatur on, 'whatever the Prez says'.
In Reno's case, she failed to press charges or prosecute numerous felonious violators of the law. So blatantly obvious was she in either dismissing or simply failing to prosecute, that she should have been brought up on charges of malfeasance in office and dereliction of duty. In my view, she remains an unindicted criminal-at-large, with justice still waiting to be done.
Eric Holder is in many ways, and even worse example of a misfit who has been elevated to an exalted position in our Federal Government. A history of accomplishment in the field of jurisprudence plus the obvious requirement for basic moral and ethical character are among the generally-accepted qualifications for holding the office of Attorney General. Such attributes are a quantum leap beyond any qualifications either real or imagined, that are possessed by the current A.G., Eric Holder. Holder is as corrupt as a Chicago politician - and as crooked as a dog's hind leg.
As long as Obama holds sway over the forces that are propelling this nation toward the precipice of destruction - and as long as Holder continues to faithfully perform his legal juggling act in support of the omnipotent Obama - and until Obama himself is rejected and ejected, I fear that justice at the Federal level will be thwarted and hideously skewed.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
He is as ill-equipped to be Attorney General as Obama is to be the President of the United States. Both are third-tier political hacks, parading as practitioners of the laws of our land - one has already been disbarred, the other has yet to be. Neither of them gives a flying fig about either the Constitution of the United States or the fair and equal application of common law to all citizens of this nation. Nor, have either of them the slightest compunction about contorting the traditional parameters of the offices they hold or exceeding their legal boundaries, when it suits their needs and the expediency of the moment.
What Attorney General Janet Reno was to Bill Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder is to Barack Hussein Obama. Both have functioned quite comfortably as legal whores, holding onto their appointed positions solely to do the bidding of the sitting president and to facilitate his every whim by putting a legal imprimatur on, 'whatever the Prez says'.
In Reno's case, she failed to press charges or prosecute numerous felonious violators of the law. So blatantly obvious was she in either dismissing or simply failing to prosecute, that she should have been brought up on charges of malfeasance in office and dereliction of duty. In my view, she remains an unindicted criminal-at-large, with justice still waiting to be done.
Eric Holder is in many ways, and even worse example of a misfit who has been elevated to an exalted position in our Federal Government. A history of accomplishment in the field of jurisprudence plus the obvious requirement for basic moral and ethical character are among the generally-accepted qualifications for holding the office of Attorney General. Such attributes are a quantum leap beyond any qualifications either real or imagined, that are possessed by the current A.G., Eric Holder. Holder is as corrupt as a Chicago politician - and as crooked as a dog's hind leg.
As long as Obama holds sway over the forces that are propelling this nation toward the precipice of destruction - and as long as Holder continues to faithfully perform his legal juggling act in support of the omnipotent Obama - and until Obama himself is rejected and ejected, I fear that justice at the Federal level will be thwarted and hideously skewed.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Monday, April 18, 2011
Continued employment of Dr. Alhalabi at Florida Atlantic University
We have another example of Political Correctness destroying America. We had the TRAITOR hassan, at Fort Hood, gun down our own Military Personnel. Coward holder and b. Hussein obama said that we should not jump to conclusions. A real President would want to slam this Radical Islamic Terrorist and Traitor but hussein wants to play patty cake with the Animal. Yes, I say Animal, as that Traitor hassan is a snake. Below we have some information from South Florida. These Radical Muslims should not get a pass especially if they are trying to teach (Brainwash as Liberals do) the young Minds of America. The comments below are from our friends at Chuck On The Right Side.
Dear President Saunders:
Since Dr. Alhalabi has plead guilty to assault, what will be his status as an instructor At FAU in the future? Is this the kind of person who should be teaching at a fine University like FAU? If it was a faculty member of a different religion (a non-Muslim) would they still be holding their position at FAU?
There should not be a double standard in this situation, he is not the type of person you should want as one of your faculty members.
Do the right thing.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Dear President Saunders:
Since Dr. Alhalabi has plead guilty to assault, what will be his status as an instructor At FAU in the future? Is this the kind of person who should be teaching at a fine University like FAU? If it was a faculty member of a different religion (a non-Muslim) would they still be holding their position at FAU?
There should not be a double standard in this situation, he is not the type of person you should want as one of your faculty members.
Do the right thing.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrats-Lie,
FAU,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Friday, March 18, 2011
Terrorists Hate the US so Stop Political Correctness
The topic of Radical Islam seems to always get watered down with some "feel good" story or Political Correctness. It is plain and simple in the eyes of the Terrorists who believe in Radical Islam. Their goal is to take over the World and kill Infidels. They have a very powerful person in the White House to cover for them. Then Radical Islam can rely on coward holder and his team of lawyers to protect them. We must wake up now or face a perilous future!
Please read the article below by the great American Hero, Pamela Geller.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
King Blew It
By Pamela Geller
Investor's Business Daily editorialized Monday that Congressman Peter King (R-NY) "blew it" in his hearings on "Muslim radicalization," and that he "didn't even come close to delivering what he advertised with his investigation." IBD criticized King for calling as a witness Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison (D-MN), a "close ally" of the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Ellison, says the IBD editorial, "stole the show when he broke into tears while retelling the story of a Muslim paramedic who died in the World Trade Center. Ellison used the victim as an example of the "witch hunt" against Muslims in America by claiming he was falsely accused of involvement in the 9/11 plot."
It gives me no pleasure to be right, again. But I wrote on January 18 that King was over his head. I criticized King for calling Ellison and not terror expert Steven Emerson or Islamic expert Robert Spencer, and wrote: "Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, infamous for his pro-Hamas rallies and his pilgrimage to the Hajj in Saudi Arabia, paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, is testifying, but Emerson and Spencer aren't? What can King achieve?"
All this has been proven correct. The entire enemedia coverage was all about Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Hakim Mohammed (aka Keith Ellison)'s bawling and crocodile tears over a fictitious tale. Hakim claimed that the Muslim paramedic killed on 9/11 was accused of terror ties when he went missing after that day, until his remains were found. In fact, the only mentions anywhere of his being accused of terror ties are in leftwing publications criticizing the right for these accusations - but there is no record of anyone on the right ever actually making the accusations.
Also, the media never reported that Hakim Mohammed's hajj was paid for with $13,350 by the Brotherhood, that Hakim was a vocal supporter of the vile Louis Farrakhan, or that Hakim has long time ties Muslim Brotherhood and is a vocal pro-Hamas supporter. King's hearings should have been designed to expose stealth jihadists like Hakim, aka Ellison. But they fell far short of that.
The Muslim victims who testified were the tip of the iceberg, and don't get me started on Jasser.
Yet King, for all his failures, looks great compared to Barack Hussein Obama. Obama has enabled Islamic supremacist infiltration at the highest levels. Arif Alikhan, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security, is affiliated with the Brotherhood-linked Muslim Public Affairs Council, and as deputy mayor of Los Angeles, quashed as "Islamophobic" an LAPD initiative simply to survey the demographics of area mosques.
Rashad Hussain, Obama's envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, characterized the Bush Administration's prosecution of Islamic Jihad leader Sami al-Arian as a witchhunt.
Dalia Mogahed, Obama's chief Muslim adviser, has praised Sharia law on British television, on a show run by the Islamic supremacist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, which is banned in many countries.
But in the age of Obama, we are not merely infiltrated, no...that is so five years ago. They are running the show. Yes, the enemy is in control. Obama confirmed that in March 2011 with one of his most egregious acts of submission to Islam. As Congressman Peter King (R-NY) began his hearings on the radicalization of Muslims in the United States, the Obama Administration issued a statement saying: "We know there are many different reasons why individuals -- from many different faiths == succumb to terrorist ideologies."
What other faiths? It is only Islam that has inspired a terrorist ideology, as demanded, commanded by the Qur'an, Hadith and Sira. For Obama to pretend otherwise is madness. Yet on March 6, 2011, Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser, Denis McDonough, gave a speech at the ADAMS Center, a mosque in Sterling, Virginia. WorldNet Daily reported in February 2008: "Another D.C.-area mosque, the ADAMS Center, was founded and financed by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and has been one of the top distributors of Wahhabist anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma."
Also, Imam Mohamed Magid is the President of the Islamic Society of North America. ISNA has admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case.
Ignorant of or indifferent to all this, McDonough said at the ADAMS Center that Islamic jihadists "falsely claim to be fighting in the name of Islam," and that "we're exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama has stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam." McDonough also said: "We also undermine al Qaeda's ideology by exposing the lie that it is somehow defending Islamic traditions when, in fact, al Qaeda violates the basic tenets of Islam."
Yet there have been over 15,000 Islamic jihad attacks around the world since 9/11, each one carried out with the imprimatur of a Muslim cleric. Just in the last few years, we have seen two Muslims in New Jersey found guilty of going jihad and plotting to kill Americans; the Christmas day underwear bomber on an airplane over Detroit, the Times Square jihad bomber, the Weapons of Mass Destruction bomber in Texas, the Fort Hood jihadi, the Christmas-tree lighting bomber in Portland, Oregon, jihadi pirates off the coast of Somalia, the jihad in Thailand, Hezb'allah's jihad in Lebanon, Islamic slaughter of Christians in Egypt, jihad murder in Ethiopia, Indonesia, Russia, and so many other places. Everywhere there are Muslims, there is a level of conflict.
How absurd, then, for the Obama Administration to claim that terrorists are "individuals" from "many different faiths." What other faiths? Where are the Christians or Jews committing acts of violence and justifying them by reference to their scriptures? This claim from the Obama Administration is deception to advance Islam; this is the same taqiyya we hear from Muslim Brotherhood groups in the US on a daily basis.
What does the mullah in the White House think he is going to achieve with this suicidal propaganda? And what does Peter King hope to achieve by sugarcoating the problem we face? Isn't there anyone on either side of the aisle who will do what is necessary to defend the American people from the jihad?
Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs website and former associate publisher of the New York Observer. She is the author of The Post-American Presidency.
Please read the article below by the great American Hero, Pamela Geller.
Hat Tip to Mr. I
King Blew It
By Pamela Geller
Investor's Business Daily editorialized Monday that Congressman Peter King (R-NY) "blew it" in his hearings on "Muslim radicalization," and that he "didn't even come close to delivering what he advertised with his investigation." IBD criticized King for calling as a witness Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison (D-MN), a "close ally" of the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Ellison, says the IBD editorial, "stole the show when he broke into tears while retelling the story of a Muslim paramedic who died in the World Trade Center. Ellison used the victim as an example of the "witch hunt" against Muslims in America by claiming he was falsely accused of involvement in the 9/11 plot."
It gives me no pleasure to be right, again. But I wrote on January 18 that King was over his head. I criticized King for calling Ellison and not terror expert Steven Emerson or Islamic expert Robert Spencer, and wrote: "Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, infamous for his pro-Hamas rallies and his pilgrimage to the Hajj in Saudi Arabia, paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, is testifying, but Emerson and Spencer aren't? What can King achieve?"
All this has been proven correct. The entire enemedia coverage was all about Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Hakim Mohammed (aka Keith Ellison)'s bawling and crocodile tears over a fictitious tale. Hakim claimed that the Muslim paramedic killed on 9/11 was accused of terror ties when he went missing after that day, until his remains were found. In fact, the only mentions anywhere of his being accused of terror ties are in leftwing publications criticizing the right for these accusations - but there is no record of anyone on the right ever actually making the accusations.
Also, the media never reported that Hakim Mohammed's hajj was paid for with $13,350 by the Brotherhood, that Hakim was a vocal supporter of the vile Louis Farrakhan, or that Hakim has long time ties Muslim Brotherhood and is a vocal pro-Hamas supporter. King's hearings should have been designed to expose stealth jihadists like Hakim, aka Ellison. But they fell far short of that.
The Muslim victims who testified were the tip of the iceberg, and don't get me started on Jasser.
Yet King, for all his failures, looks great compared to Barack Hussein Obama. Obama has enabled Islamic supremacist infiltration at the highest levels. Arif Alikhan, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security, is affiliated with the Brotherhood-linked Muslim Public Affairs Council, and as deputy mayor of Los Angeles, quashed as "Islamophobic" an LAPD initiative simply to survey the demographics of area mosques.
Rashad Hussain, Obama's envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, characterized the Bush Administration's prosecution of Islamic Jihad leader Sami al-Arian as a witchhunt.
Dalia Mogahed, Obama's chief Muslim adviser, has praised Sharia law on British television, on a show run by the Islamic supremacist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, which is banned in many countries.
But in the age of Obama, we are not merely infiltrated, no...that is so five years ago. They are running the show. Yes, the enemy is in control. Obama confirmed that in March 2011 with one of his most egregious acts of submission to Islam. As Congressman Peter King (R-NY) began his hearings on the radicalization of Muslims in the United States, the Obama Administration issued a statement saying: "We know there are many different reasons why individuals -- from many different faiths == succumb to terrorist ideologies."
What other faiths? It is only Islam that has inspired a terrorist ideology, as demanded, commanded by the Qur'an, Hadith and Sira. For Obama to pretend otherwise is madness. Yet on March 6, 2011, Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser, Denis McDonough, gave a speech at the ADAMS Center, a mosque in Sterling, Virginia. WorldNet Daily reported in February 2008: "Another D.C.-area mosque, the ADAMS Center, was founded and financed by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and has been one of the top distributors of Wahhabist anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma."
Also, Imam Mohamed Magid is the President of the Islamic Society of North America. ISNA has admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, and is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case.
Ignorant of or indifferent to all this, McDonough said at the ADAMS Center that Islamic jihadists "falsely claim to be fighting in the name of Islam," and that "we're exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama has stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam." McDonough also said: "We also undermine al Qaeda's ideology by exposing the lie that it is somehow defending Islamic traditions when, in fact, al Qaeda violates the basic tenets of Islam."
Yet there have been over 15,000 Islamic jihad attacks around the world since 9/11, each one carried out with the imprimatur of a Muslim cleric. Just in the last few years, we have seen two Muslims in New Jersey found guilty of going jihad and plotting to kill Americans; the Christmas day underwear bomber on an airplane over Detroit, the Times Square jihad bomber, the Weapons of Mass Destruction bomber in Texas, the Fort Hood jihadi, the Christmas-tree lighting bomber in Portland, Oregon, jihadi pirates off the coast of Somalia, the jihad in Thailand, Hezb'allah's jihad in Lebanon, Islamic slaughter of Christians in Egypt, jihad murder in Ethiopia, Indonesia, Russia, and so many other places. Everywhere there are Muslims, there is a level of conflict.
How absurd, then, for the Obama Administration to claim that terrorists are "individuals" from "many different faiths." What other faiths? Where are the Christians or Jews committing acts of violence and justifying them by reference to their scriptures? This claim from the Obama Administration is deception to advance Islam; this is the same taqiyya we hear from Muslim Brotherhood groups in the US on a daily basis.
What does the mullah in the White House think he is going to achieve with this suicidal propaganda? And what does Peter King hope to achieve by sugarcoating the problem we face? Isn't there anyone on either side of the aisle who will do what is necessary to defend the American people from the jihad?
Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs website and former associate publisher of the New York Observer. She is the author of The Post-American Presidency.
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Radical Islam heinous Acts Against the United States
Dear Sun-Sentinel Editor:
To read some of the complaints in the Sun-Sentinel about the House hearings chaired by Rep. Peter King, you'd think he was conducting a witchhunt without any real purpose in mind. Do we have a problem with certain groups in this country who want to do us harm? Are certain people actively being recruited to engage in heinous acts against the United States, which is you and I?
Of course, there is a need to bring light upon this potential danger, regardless of whether certain people consider it to be politically incorrect or not. A perfect example is right here in our own backyard. Passing by a synagogue or temple on the Jewish sabbath, you'll find armed guards patrolling and checking out the visitors to these places of worship. Why? Everyone knows, or should know, that these places of worship are prime targets for terrorists and extremists.
Only fools would consider this an over reaction in trying to find out who these potential terrorists are and who is recruiting them to do their dirty deeds. I don't think these Jewish places of worship are protecting themselves from Swedish, Costa Rican, South Korean or Lutheran terrorists. Wake up and smell the coffee!
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
To read some of the complaints in the Sun-Sentinel about the House hearings chaired by Rep. Peter King, you'd think he was conducting a witchhunt without any real purpose in mind. Do we have a problem with certain groups in this country who want to do us harm? Are certain people actively being recruited to engage in heinous acts against the United States, which is you and I?
Of course, there is a need to bring light upon this potential danger, regardless of whether certain people consider it to be politically incorrect or not. A perfect example is right here in our own backyard. Passing by a synagogue or temple on the Jewish sabbath, you'll find armed guards patrolling and checking out the visitors to these places of worship. Why? Everyone knows, or should know, that these places of worship are prime targets for terrorists and extremists.
Only fools would consider this an over reaction in trying to find out who these potential terrorists are and who is recruiting them to do their dirty deeds. I don't think these Jewish places of worship are protecting themselves from Swedish, Costa Rican, South Korean or Lutheran terrorists. Wake up and smell the coffee!
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Department of Justice Enforces the Sharia
The current Regime will perform an Anti-American act every time you turn around. The B. Hussein Obama and his coward, eric holder, and the blind janet napolitano just do not dig America. Especially White People who are Infidels, just don't have a chance with this administration. Yes, the current regime will support any Radical who wants to harm America. Radical Islam, Illegal Aliens, new Black Panthers and others.
Below is an oustanding post from Atlas Shrugs. Pamela Geller is a true American Hero!
Department of Justice Enforces the Sharia: Sues Illinois School District for Muslim Teacher Hajj
We continue to suffer Islamic attacks from the Department of Justice. The latest? A lawsuit filed on behalf of a Muslim teacher who wanted to abandon her students to make her once-in-a-lifetime trip to the hajj. The school needed her and said no. The school district denied the teacher's request because the purpose of her leave was not related to her professional duties, nor was it leave for any of the specific purposes set forth in the Professional Negotiations Agreement between the district and the teachers’ union.
Obama's Department of Sharia sued the school system to ensure the kids get screwed but the teacher got the hajj.
This is the same DOJ's Holder who spoke at the Muslim Advocates dinner this past weekend and reassured Muslims of "DOJ's anti-bias focus."
This is the same DOJ's Holder who sued a New Jersey county demanding a correction facility accommodate a Muslim employee's khimar, a religious head covering.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who did nothing about Black Panthers harassing, intimidating and suppressing the vote in 2008.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who did nothing to prosecute the egregious voter fraud committed by ACORN.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who sabotaged/disenfranchised the Military vote.
The Department of Justice sponsored a booth at the Muslim Brotherhood front ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention underwritten by, among others, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked CAIR.
Further, Obama's Department of Justice dropped the "charges" against the Muslims who blew up the USS Cole.
Obama's Department of Justice is still trying to bring the 911 mastermind to New York City for a civilian trial. The new Congress is having none of it. Khalid Sheik Mohammed cannot be tried, due to opposition of lawmakers in Congress and in New York, (more on that at the Washington Post).
FOX news: Do you believe that the DOJ has a policy now of not pursuing cases if the defendant is black and the victim is white?
DOJ lawyer, ADAM: Well, particularly in voting. In voting that will be the case over the next few years, there’s no doubt about it.
Now this.
Justice Department Files Religious Discrimination Lawsuit Against Berkeley School District in Illinois (DoJ press release)
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department today announced it has filed a lawsuit against Berkeley School District, Berkeley, Ill., alleging that the school district violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate the religious practices of Safoorah Khan, a Muslim teacher at McArthur Middle School.
The government’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, alleges that Ms. Khan requested an unpaid leave of absence in December 2008 to perform Hajj, a pilgrimage required by her religion. According to the complaint, Berkeley School District denied Ms. Khan’s request because the purpose of her leave was not related to her professional duties nor was it leave for any of the specific purposes set forth in the Professional Negotiations Agreement between the district and the teachers’ union. The United States further alleges that, because Berkeley School District denied her a religious accommodation, the district compelled Ms. Khan to choose between her job and her religious beliefs, and thus forced her discharge.
The lawsuit is based on a charge of discrimination filed by Ms. Khan with the Chicago District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). After investigating Ms. Khan’s charge, finding reasonable cause to believe that Berkeley School District had discriminated against Ms. Khan, and unsuccessfully attempting to conciliate the matter, the EEOC referred the charge to the Department of Justice. More information about the EEOC is available on its website at www.eeoc.gov.
In the lawsuit, the United States seeks an order requiring Berkeley School District to adopt a policy designed to reasonably accommodate the religious observances, practices and beliefs of employees and prospective employees. In addition, the United States seeks back pay, compensatory damages and reinstatement for Ms. Khan.
"Employees should not have to choose between their religious practice and their livelihood," said Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. "Federal law prohibits employers from treating employees and applicants less favorably because of their religion, and requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for the religious beliefs and practices of their employees."
"The EEOC is committed to ensuring that individuals are protected from religious discrimination at work," said Jacqueline A. Berrien, Chair of the EEOC. "We are pleased to foster this important collaboration with the Department of Justice to enforce the laws that ensure our workplaces are free of bias."
This is the first lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice as a result of a pilot project designed to ensure vigorous enforcement of Title VII against state and local governmental employers by enhancing cooperation between the EEOC and the Civil Rights Division.
The filing of the lawsuit reflects the Civil Right’s Divisions ongoing commitment to actively enforce federal employment discrimination laws.
Below is an oustanding post from Atlas Shrugs. Pamela Geller is a true American Hero!
Department of Justice Enforces the Sharia: Sues Illinois School District for Muslim Teacher Hajj
We continue to suffer Islamic attacks from the Department of Justice. The latest? A lawsuit filed on behalf of a Muslim teacher who wanted to abandon her students to make her once-in-a-lifetime trip to the hajj. The school needed her and said no. The school district denied the teacher's request because the purpose of her leave was not related to her professional duties, nor was it leave for any of the specific purposes set forth in the Professional Negotiations Agreement between the district and the teachers’ union.
Obama's Department of Sharia sued the school system to ensure the kids get screwed but the teacher got the hajj.
This is the same DOJ's Holder who spoke at the Muslim Advocates dinner this past weekend and reassured Muslims of "DOJ's anti-bias focus."
This is the same DOJ's Holder who sued a New Jersey county demanding a correction facility accommodate a Muslim employee's khimar, a religious head covering.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who did nothing about Black Panthers harassing, intimidating and suppressing the vote in 2008.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who did nothing to prosecute the egregious voter fraud committed by ACORN.
This is the same DoJ's Holder who sabotaged/disenfranchised the Military vote.
The Department of Justice sponsored a booth at the Muslim Brotherhood front ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention underwritten by, among others, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked CAIR.
Further, Obama's Department of Justice dropped the "charges" against the Muslims who blew up the USS Cole.
Obama's Department of Justice is still trying to bring the 911 mastermind to New York City for a civilian trial. The new Congress is having none of it. Khalid Sheik Mohammed cannot be tried, due to opposition of lawmakers in Congress and in New York, (more on that at the Washington Post).
FOX news: Do you believe that the DOJ has a policy now of not pursuing cases if the defendant is black and the victim is white?
DOJ lawyer, ADAM: Well, particularly in voting. In voting that will be the case over the next few years, there’s no doubt about it.
Now this.
Justice Department Files Religious Discrimination Lawsuit Against Berkeley School District in Illinois (DoJ press release)
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department today announced it has filed a lawsuit against Berkeley School District, Berkeley, Ill., alleging that the school district violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate the religious practices of Safoorah Khan, a Muslim teacher at McArthur Middle School.
The government’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, alleges that Ms. Khan requested an unpaid leave of absence in December 2008 to perform Hajj, a pilgrimage required by her religion. According to the complaint, Berkeley School District denied Ms. Khan’s request because the purpose of her leave was not related to her professional duties nor was it leave for any of the specific purposes set forth in the Professional Negotiations Agreement between the district and the teachers’ union. The United States further alleges that, because Berkeley School District denied her a religious accommodation, the district compelled Ms. Khan to choose between her job and her religious beliefs, and thus forced her discharge.
The lawsuit is based on a charge of discrimination filed by Ms. Khan with the Chicago District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). After investigating Ms. Khan’s charge, finding reasonable cause to believe that Berkeley School District had discriminated against Ms. Khan, and unsuccessfully attempting to conciliate the matter, the EEOC referred the charge to the Department of Justice. More information about the EEOC is available on its website at www.eeoc.gov.
In the lawsuit, the United States seeks an order requiring Berkeley School District to adopt a policy designed to reasonably accommodate the religious observances, practices and beliefs of employees and prospective employees. In addition, the United States seeks back pay, compensatory damages and reinstatement for Ms. Khan.
"Employees should not have to choose between their religious practice and their livelihood," said Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. "Federal law prohibits employers from treating employees and applicants less favorably because of their religion, and requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for the religious beliefs and practices of their employees."
"The EEOC is committed to ensuring that individuals are protected from religious discrimination at work," said Jacqueline A. Berrien, Chair of the EEOC. "We are pleased to foster this important collaboration with the Department of Justice to enforce the laws that ensure our workplaces are free of bias."
This is the first lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice as a result of a pilot project designed to ensure vigorous enforcement of Title VII against state and local governmental employers by enhancing cooperation between the EEOC and the Civil Rights Division.
The filing of the lawsuit reflects the Civil Right’s Divisions ongoing commitment to actively enforce federal employment discrimination laws.
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Monday, March 7, 2011
Ed Meese: Defend those who Defend us
We often see our Policeman and Troops who are accused of outlandish event that turn out to be lies from our Enemies. Our Policemen and Troops are not highly paid like a kanya west or a kim kardashian or a charlie sheen. Yet many Americans promote the sleazy wanna-be celebrities when our Protectors are thrown to the wolves. We are having our Border Patrol Agents armed with bean bags? Are we living in a Communist Country or what?
Below we have a posting from the great Ed Meese. Ed Meese is standing up for our fine Law Enforcement Officers
Ed Meese: Defend those who Defend us
During the past holiday season, we all became very busy buying gifts and making plans for family dinners. However, today we forget about the gifts we are given and the sacrifices made by public servants every day. Law enforcement officers risk their lives in the line of duty all year long. In my opinion that is the greatest gift a person can give.
My name is Edwin Meese III, the 75th Attorney General of the United States of America. Throughout my entire life and career I have had the utmost respect for police officers who risk their lives to defend our safety. I am a Board Member of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (LELDF), a non-profit organization that defends law enforcement officers unfairly charged for actions taken in the line of duty. It is an outrage that dangerous criminals attempt to ruin the lives and careers of the officer who arrested them. LELDF supports and defends our law enforcement men and women who daily risk their lives to insure the safety of our communities and our families.
All too frequently police officers are wrongfully accused for actions taken in the line of duty. These accusations often come from the very criminal suspects that police officers protect us from, even though the officers have implemented the policies and techniques they were trained to perform. The wrongful accusations are frequently made by criminals to evade prosecution and out of some mistaken belief that if they make enough accusations they will destroy careers and bring financial ruin to the officers.
I am writing about officers that are accused of misconduct by criminals while performing their duties as they have been trained. Sadly these accusations can result in wrongful prosecution. One reason some of these cases are lost is the fact that most police officers simply cannot afford an adequate defense. That is where the LELDF can help.
Criminals, many of them in the country illegally, make outrageous accusations against honest hardworking police officers. Patriotic and thankful Americans, such as ourselves, must help these officers on whom we rely so much. $25, $50, $100 or as much as you can give will allow LELDF to continue defending those who defend our safety by Clicking Here!

For instance, Officer Robert Lawlor, recently acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges, is facing a civil case for wrongful death; Officer Raymond Bunn recently had all charges of murder and manslaughter dismissed on grounds of self defense but is facing a civil trial for wrongful death of a man who tried to run over him with an SUV; Officer Torrey Thompson, facing a criminal trial for murder and manslaughter is now facing a civil trial for wrongful death of a dangerous felon.
LELDF relies on the generosity of thousands of thankful Americans like you to pay the legal fees and expert witness cost for officers that have been wrongly accused. Unfortunately, unlike these criminals, these heroic Police Officers do not have the taxpayers to pay the expenses.
At LELDF we can’t sit by when so many officers are being punished for doing a job they were trained to do .We have long accepted that Law Enforcement Officers are held to a higher standard when it comes to behavior. Is it not time that these officers get equal standards when it comes to their ability to defend actions taken in the line of duty?
That’s why I am asking you to think about the men and women facing unfair criminal prosecutions and civil actions for crimes they didn’t commit. They were doing their job protecting our families all throughout the year. By donating $25, $50, $100 or as much as you can give, you can help LELDF defend those who have defended us.
Sincerely,
Edwin Meese III
former U.S. Attorney General
Below we have a posting from the great Ed Meese. Ed Meese is standing up for our fine Law Enforcement Officers
Ed Meese: Defend those who Defend us
During the past holiday season, we all became very busy buying gifts and making plans for family dinners. However, today we forget about the gifts we are given and the sacrifices made by public servants every day. Law enforcement officers risk their lives in the line of duty all year long. In my opinion that is the greatest gift a person can give.
My name is Edwin Meese III, the 75th Attorney General of the United States of America. Throughout my entire life and career I have had the utmost respect for police officers who risk their lives to defend our safety. I am a Board Member of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (LELDF), a non-profit organization that defends law enforcement officers unfairly charged for actions taken in the line of duty. It is an outrage that dangerous criminals attempt to ruin the lives and careers of the officer who arrested them. LELDF supports and defends our law enforcement men and women who daily risk their lives to insure the safety of our communities and our families.
All too frequently police officers are wrongfully accused for actions taken in the line of duty. These accusations often come from the very criminal suspects that police officers protect us from, even though the officers have implemented the policies and techniques they were trained to perform. The wrongful accusations are frequently made by criminals to evade prosecution and out of some mistaken belief that if they make enough accusations they will destroy careers and bring financial ruin to the officers.
I am writing about officers that are accused of misconduct by criminals while performing their duties as they have been trained. Sadly these accusations can result in wrongful prosecution. One reason some of these cases are lost is the fact that most police officers simply cannot afford an adequate defense. That is where the LELDF can help.
Criminals, many of them in the country illegally, make outrageous accusations against honest hardworking police officers. Patriotic and thankful Americans, such as ourselves, must help these officers on whom we rely so much. $25, $50, $100 or as much as you can give will allow LELDF to continue defending those who defend our safety by Clicking Here!

For instance, Officer Robert Lawlor, recently acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges, is facing a civil case for wrongful death; Officer Raymond Bunn recently had all charges of murder and manslaughter dismissed on grounds of self defense but is facing a civil trial for wrongful death of a man who tried to run over him with an SUV; Officer Torrey Thompson, facing a criminal trial for murder and manslaughter is now facing a civil trial for wrongful death of a dangerous felon.
LELDF relies on the generosity of thousands of thankful Americans like you to pay the legal fees and expert witness cost for officers that have been wrongly accused. Unfortunately, unlike these criminals, these heroic Police Officers do not have the taxpayers to pay the expenses.
At LELDF we can’t sit by when so many officers are being punished for doing a job they were trained to do .We have long accepted that Law Enforcement Officers are held to a higher standard when it comes to behavior. Is it not time that these officers get equal standards when it comes to their ability to defend actions taken in the line of duty?
That’s why I am asking you to think about the men and women facing unfair criminal prosecutions and civil actions for crimes they didn’t commit. They were doing their job protecting our families all throughout the year. By donating $25, $50, $100 or as much as you can give, you can help LELDF defend those who have defended us.
Sincerely,
Edwin Meese III
former U.S. Attorney General
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Ed-Meese,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Inhumane Treatment of Elderly Patients on UK Healthcare
We have some results from The Socialized Healthcare system in England. How many times do we have to hear "well EUROPE does this, that or the other, so WE should"? I love England as an Ally. (although Barry Soetoro has spit on the UK and treated them like dirt). However, we are America. We are not Greece, France or Kenya (or are we ruled by a Kenyan? just kidding, wink wink). Also we are not Spain yet, with the Green jobs and 20% unemployment.
If the Slave Owner Regime was so Brilliant, then why didn't they investigate other Countries with obamcare type, government controlled healthcare.
NHS shamed over callous treatment of elderly
The National Health Service is today condemned over its inhumane treatment of elderly patients in an official report that finds hospitals are failing to meet “even the most basic standards of care” for the over-65s.
Portion below written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent
A study of pensioners who suffered appalling treatment at the hands of doctors and nurses says that half were not given enough to eat or drink. One family member said the maltreatment amounted to “euthanasia”.
Some were left unwashed or in soiled clothes, while others were forgotten after being sent home or given the wrong medication.
In several cases considered by the Health Service Ombudsman, patients died without loved ones by their sides because of the “casual indifference” of staff and their “bewildering disregard” for people’s needs.
The damning report warns that extra money will not help the NHS meet required standards of care and that more problems are likely as the population ages.
Ann Abraham, who as health ombudsman carries out independent investigation of complaints against the health service, said: “The findings of my investigations reveal an attitude – both personal and institutional – which fails to recognise the humanity and individuality of the people concerned and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism.
“The reasonable expectation that an older person or their family may have of dignified, pain-free end of life care in clean surroundings in hospital is not being fulfilled. Instead, these accounts present a picture of NHS provision that is failing to meet even the most basic standards of care.
“These often harrowing accounts should cause every member of NHS staff who reads this report to pause and ask themselves if any of their patients could suffer in the same way.
“I know from my caseload that in many cases, the answer must be 'yes’.”
Michelle Mitchell, charity director at Age UK, said: “The inhumane treatment of older people described in this report is sickening and should send shock waves through the NHS and Government.
“It’s difficult to imagine us allowing any other group of people to suffer this indignity and neglect, yet we know this is just the tip of the iceberg. Appalling treatment of older people in the health service is far too common.”
Under Labour, health spending in England tripled to reach more than £100 billion a year. A new “NHS Constitution” set out the service’s commitment to human rights, high-quality care and respect for patients and their families.
Yet the Ombudsman said her office’s investigations into the cases of 10 people over 65, which took place between 2009 and last year, showed the “stark contrast” between the NHS’s stated principles and the treatment patients received.
The patients had all been loving, active people of a generation that “didn’t like to make a fuss”. They had simply wanted to be cared for properly and die peacefully – but they all suffered “unnecessary pain, indignity and distress while in the care of the NHS”. As a result, “they were transformed from alert and able individuals to people who were dehydrated, malnourished or unable to communicate”.
Half of them did not consume adequate food or water, some were not washed, others were discharged in a “shambolic” fashion, while in many cases their suffering was ignored.
Nine of the 10 died while in NHS care or soon afterwards, and the Ombudsman upheld the complaints made about the care received by all 10.
The report says it is “incomprehensible” that the NHS needs to be told that its patients should be provided with clean and comfortable surroundings, assistance with eating, drinking water and the ability to call for help. “Yet the most basic of human needs are too often neglected.”
The “harrowing” cases in the report disclose:
• An 82 year-old died alone because staff did not realise her husband had been waiting to see her for three hours;
• A woman was not washed during 13 weeks in hospital, did not have her wound dressings changed and was denied food and drink;
• A woman was discharged from hospital covered in bruises, soaked in urine and wearing someone else’s clothes;
• The life-support system of a heart attack victim was switched off despite his wife asking to leave it on while she contacted the rest of the family.
The Ombudsman warned that the cases detailed in the report were not exceptional, with almost one in five of the 9,000 complaints it received last year concerning the care of older people.
The report notes that by 2034, 23 per cent of the population will be over 65, with rising levels of dementia placing additional burdens on care. But “extra resource alone will not help” as some staff are guilty of an “ignominious failure to look beyond a patient’s clinical condition”, and an “apparent indifference” to “appalling standards of care”.
The Ombudsman said that “real and urgent change” was needed, including listening to older people and their families, as well as learning from mistakes.
Paul Burstow, the care services minister, said: “This report exposes the urgent need to update our NHS. We need a culture where poor practice is challenged and quality is the watchword. The dignity of frail older people should never be sidelined.”
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: “Attitudes need to change. Older patients need to be treated with respect and compassion, not as an inconvenience. It is a sick joke that we have an NHS constitution that tells us what rights we have when being treated by the NHS – but it is clear that to the majority of older patients it is not worth the paper it is written on.”
Nigel Edwards, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “It is of course important to put these 10 examples in perspective. The NHS sees over a million people every 36 hours and the overwhelming majority say they receive good care. But I fully appreciate that this will be of little comfort to patients and their families when they have been on the receiving end of poor care.”
Written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent
If the Slave Owner Regime was so Brilliant, then why didn't they investigate other Countries with obamcare type, government controlled healthcare.
NHS shamed over callous treatment of elderly
The National Health Service is today condemned over its inhumane treatment of elderly patients in an official report that finds hospitals are failing to meet “even the most basic standards of care” for the over-65s.
Portion below written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent
A study of pensioners who suffered appalling treatment at the hands of doctors and nurses says that half were not given enough to eat or drink. One family member said the maltreatment amounted to “euthanasia”.
Some were left unwashed or in soiled clothes, while others were forgotten after being sent home or given the wrong medication.
In several cases considered by the Health Service Ombudsman, patients died without loved ones by their sides because of the “casual indifference” of staff and their “bewildering disregard” for people’s needs.
The damning report warns that extra money will not help the NHS meet required standards of care and that more problems are likely as the population ages.
Ann Abraham, who as health ombudsman carries out independent investigation of complaints against the health service, said: “The findings of my investigations reveal an attitude – both personal and institutional – which fails to recognise the humanity and individuality of the people concerned and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism.
“The reasonable expectation that an older person or their family may have of dignified, pain-free end of life care in clean surroundings in hospital is not being fulfilled. Instead, these accounts present a picture of NHS provision that is failing to meet even the most basic standards of care.
“These often harrowing accounts should cause every member of NHS staff who reads this report to pause and ask themselves if any of their patients could suffer in the same way.
“I know from my caseload that in many cases, the answer must be 'yes’.”
Michelle Mitchell, charity director at Age UK, said: “The inhumane treatment of older people described in this report is sickening and should send shock waves through the NHS and Government.
“It’s difficult to imagine us allowing any other group of people to suffer this indignity and neglect, yet we know this is just the tip of the iceberg. Appalling treatment of older people in the health service is far too common.”
Under Labour, health spending in England tripled to reach more than £100 billion a year. A new “NHS Constitution” set out the service’s commitment to human rights, high-quality care and respect for patients and their families.
Yet the Ombudsman said her office’s investigations into the cases of 10 people over 65, which took place between 2009 and last year, showed the “stark contrast” between the NHS’s stated principles and the treatment patients received.
The patients had all been loving, active people of a generation that “didn’t like to make a fuss”. They had simply wanted to be cared for properly and die peacefully – but they all suffered “unnecessary pain, indignity and distress while in the care of the NHS”. As a result, “they were transformed from alert and able individuals to people who were dehydrated, malnourished or unable to communicate”.
Half of them did not consume adequate food or water, some were not washed, others were discharged in a “shambolic” fashion, while in many cases their suffering was ignored.
Nine of the 10 died while in NHS care or soon afterwards, and the Ombudsman upheld the complaints made about the care received by all 10.
The report says it is “incomprehensible” that the NHS needs to be told that its patients should be provided with clean and comfortable surroundings, assistance with eating, drinking water and the ability to call for help. “Yet the most basic of human needs are too often neglected.”
The “harrowing” cases in the report disclose:
• An 82 year-old died alone because staff did not realise her husband had been waiting to see her for three hours;
• A woman was not washed during 13 weeks in hospital, did not have her wound dressings changed and was denied food and drink;
• A woman was discharged from hospital covered in bruises, soaked in urine and wearing someone else’s clothes;
• The life-support system of a heart attack victim was switched off despite his wife asking to leave it on while she contacted the rest of the family.
The Ombudsman warned that the cases detailed in the report were not exceptional, with almost one in five of the 9,000 complaints it received last year concerning the care of older people.
The report notes that by 2034, 23 per cent of the population will be over 65, with rising levels of dementia placing additional burdens on care. But “extra resource alone will not help” as some staff are guilty of an “ignominious failure to look beyond a patient’s clinical condition”, and an “apparent indifference” to “appalling standards of care”.
The Ombudsman said that “real and urgent change” was needed, including listening to older people and their families, as well as learning from mistakes.
Paul Burstow, the care services minister, said: “This report exposes the urgent need to update our NHS. We need a culture where poor practice is challenged and quality is the watchword. The dignity of frail older people should never be sidelined.”
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: “Attitudes need to change. Older patients need to be treated with respect and compassion, not as an inconvenience. It is a sick joke that we have an NHS constitution that tells us what rights we have when being treated by the NHS – but it is clear that to the majority of older patients it is not worth the paper it is written on.”
Nigel Edwards, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “It is of course important to put these 10 examples in perspective. The NHS sees over a million people every 36 hours and the overwhelming majority say they receive good care. But I fully appreciate that this will be of little comfort to patients and their families when they have been on the receiving end of poor care.”
Written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Obamacare,
racist-reverends,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, February 14, 2011
WAKE Up America! Liberals Support Illegals, Not You!
My great great grandfather watched as his friends died in the Civil War, my grandfather watched as his friends died in WW II, and my father watched as my friends died in Vietnam .
None of them died for the Mexican Flag.
Everyone died for the U.S. flag.
In Texas , a student raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole; another student took it down. Guess who was expelled...the kid who took it down.
Kids in high school in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.
Enough is enough.
The below e-mail message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough.
I'm taking a stand.
I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the U.S. flag can't stand up.
And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
Let me make this perfectly clear!
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And, because I make This statement DOES NOT
Mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome! To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
And
6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you. If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM! When will AMERICANS STOP giving away THEIR RIGHTS???
We've gone so far the other way...
bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!
WAKE UP America!!!
If You agree.... Pass this on.
Hat Tip to B!
None of them died for the Mexican Flag.
Everyone died for the U.S. flag.
In Texas , a student raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole; another student took it down. Guess who was expelled...the kid who took it down.
Kids in high school in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.
Enough is enough.
The below e-mail message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough.
I'm taking a stand.
I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the U.S. flag can't stand up.
And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
Let me make this perfectly clear!
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And, because I make This statement DOES NOT
Mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome! To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
And
6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you. If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM! When will AMERICANS STOP giving away THEIR RIGHTS???
We've gone so far the other way...
bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!
WAKE UP America!!!
If You agree.... Pass this on.
Hat Tip to B!
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Friday, February 11, 2011
Bolton for President: A ‘Goldwater Conservative’
John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, tells National Review Online that he is seriously considering a 2012 presidential run. “I am a Goldwater conservative,” he says. “I am not a professional politician. I don’t anticipate running a typical kind of campaign, if I do make that decision.”
“I think in the last two years, President Obama has deliberately, consciously downplayed the threats that the United States faces in the world. I don’t think he’s interested in national security,” Bolton continues. “I think it is very important that whoever the Republican nominee turns out to be, they’re able to stand toe-to-toe with the president in the debates in 2012.”
Bolton says that he has been thinking about a 2012 challenge since early 2009, soon after President Obama first took office. “I don’t think he fundamentally believes that it is his job to advance American interests,” he says
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
racist-reverends,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Video
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Why Does Barry Hussein Hate Arizona?
A President attacking his own States? The abuse that Arizona has suffered under this Marxist Regime is ridiculous. Planned Parenthood, Muslim Brotherhood, Illegal ALIENS, The SEIU, New Black Panthers and ACORN receive support from the Regime. How long can this continue?
Portion below by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner.
Obama Administration colluded with ACLU to attack Arizona
A leading Washington, DC public-interest group, that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported on Thursday afternoon that it has received documents from Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice that reveal the DOJ worked hand-in-hand with the American Civil Liberties Union in mounting their respective legal challenges to SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough illegal immigration law, according to Judicial Watch public affairs director Jill Farrell.
In her report -- submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police Legislative Committee -- Farrell states that pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed as far back as June 17, 2010, the documents released to Judicial Watch include email exchanges between Justice Department officials and the ACLU's staff.
Included among the documents obtained by Farrell's Judicial Watch colleagues is a July 27, 2010, email exchange between Lucas Guttentag, leader of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and the DOJ’s Edwin Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General:
2:15 pm: Ed
I left a voicemail earlier today about checking in once the district court rules. Would you be available then?
[Redacted statement] And from all of us, thank you again for your argument on behalf of the United States.
Lucas
2:40 pm: Thanks Lucas. We should definitely check in once we hear. We’ll be huddling here as soon as we can. What is your thinking at this point on if/how you will proceed in various possible scenarios?
It was good to see you, even if only briefly, and to be on the same side for once! [Redacted statement] I have a feeling we might be seeing each other again on this case.
Ed
6:14 pm: Thanks Ed. Yes, a real pleasure to be on the same side.
I think we will be strongly inclined to seek an immediate emergency injunction from the 9th Circuit…
Can you share your current thinking with regard to the various scenarios?
Best Lucas
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include email exchanges between ACLU staff and Joshua Wilkenfeld, the Assistant U.S. Attorney who signed the government’s pleadings in the lawsuit, exchanged hearing transcripts and established opportunities to discuss the case. For example, the documents included this July 16, 2010, email from Guttentag to Wilkenfeld:
Josh
…Yes, look forward to talking. I’m getting a fuller briefing on yesterday’s hearing later this morning (Calif. time) and then I am tied up for a short while. Would it work for you to talk at about 4.00 or 4.30p Eastern? If it’s okay with you, I’d like to include two colleagues. By the way, we tried to order a transcript yesterday but understand the US Attorney’s office already did. Can we get a copy directly from you when it’s available?
All best,
Lucas
Assistant U.S. Attorney Wilkenfeld sent the transcript to the ACLU later that day.
"In the aftermath of President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, the White House, the Democrat Party, and the majority of the members of the news media tried to convince Americans that Obama is a moderate or a centrist. Well, if he is a moderate, why is his administration working with an organization that's decidedly far-left?" asks political strategist Mike Baker.
On May 17, 2010, a coalition of “civil rights groups,” including the ACLU, filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona over SB 1070. According to the ACLU’s press release announcing the lawsuit, this coalition included: “…the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.”
On July 6, 2010, the Obama DOJ filed a lawsuit of its own, which has been described by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) as a “cut and paste” version of the ACLU lawsuit, Farrell revealed.
“It is one thing to share the ACLU’s disrespect for the rule of law but it is quite another to collude with the organization on a prosecutorial strategy against the State of Arizona. Frankly, these new documents show it is hard to tell where the ACLU ends and the Justice Department begins,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The Obama Justice Department is supposed to be an independent, nonpartisan law enforcement agency. Many Americans will be disturbed, though maybe not surprised, to find that Eric Holder’s Justice Department is colluding with one of the most leftist organizations in the nation. We know whose ‘side’ this Justice Department is on when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Fitton stated.
According to Ms. Farrell, Judicial Watch is representing Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070, pro bono in the Obama administration’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona law.
Last October, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to Arizona's SB 1070, which Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
Like the ACLU, the majority of judges sitting on the bench of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are far-left ideologues who hold the record for most overturned decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Written by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Portion below by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner.
Obama Administration colluded with ACLU to attack Arizona
A leading Washington, DC public-interest group, that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported on Thursday afternoon that it has received documents from Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice that reveal the DOJ worked hand-in-hand with the American Civil Liberties Union in mounting their respective legal challenges to SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough illegal immigration law, according to Judicial Watch public affairs director Jill Farrell.
In her report -- submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police Legislative Committee -- Farrell states that pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed as far back as June 17, 2010, the documents released to Judicial Watch include email exchanges between Justice Department officials and the ACLU's staff.
Included among the documents obtained by Farrell's Judicial Watch colleagues is a July 27, 2010, email exchange between Lucas Guttentag, leader of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and the DOJ’s Edwin Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General:
2:15 pm: Ed
I left a voicemail earlier today about checking in once the district court rules. Would you be available then?
[Redacted statement] And from all of us, thank you again for your argument on behalf of the United States.
Lucas
2:40 pm: Thanks Lucas. We should definitely check in once we hear. We’ll be huddling here as soon as we can. What is your thinking at this point on if/how you will proceed in various possible scenarios?
It was good to see you, even if only briefly, and to be on the same side for once! [Redacted statement] I have a feeling we might be seeing each other again on this case.
Ed
6:14 pm: Thanks Ed. Yes, a real pleasure to be on the same side.
I think we will be strongly inclined to seek an immediate emergency injunction from the 9th Circuit…
Can you share your current thinking with regard to the various scenarios?
Best Lucas
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include email exchanges between ACLU staff and Joshua Wilkenfeld, the Assistant U.S. Attorney who signed the government’s pleadings in the lawsuit, exchanged hearing transcripts and established opportunities to discuss the case. For example, the documents included this July 16, 2010, email from Guttentag to Wilkenfeld:
Josh
…Yes, look forward to talking. I’m getting a fuller briefing on yesterday’s hearing later this morning (Calif. time) and then I am tied up for a short while. Would it work for you to talk at about 4.00 or 4.30p Eastern? If it’s okay with you, I’d like to include two colleagues. By the way, we tried to order a transcript yesterday but understand the US Attorney’s office already did. Can we get a copy directly from you when it’s available?
All best,
Lucas
Assistant U.S. Attorney Wilkenfeld sent the transcript to the ACLU later that day.
"In the aftermath of President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, the White House, the Democrat Party, and the majority of the members of the news media tried to convince Americans that Obama is a moderate or a centrist. Well, if he is a moderate, why is his administration working with an organization that's decidedly far-left?" asks political strategist Mike Baker.
On May 17, 2010, a coalition of “civil rights groups,” including the ACLU, filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona over SB 1070. According to the ACLU’s press release announcing the lawsuit, this coalition included: “…the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.”
On July 6, 2010, the Obama DOJ filed a lawsuit of its own, which has been described by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) as a “cut and paste” version of the ACLU lawsuit, Farrell revealed.
“It is one thing to share the ACLU’s disrespect for the rule of law but it is quite another to collude with the organization on a prosecutorial strategy against the State of Arizona. Frankly, these new documents show it is hard to tell where the ACLU ends and the Justice Department begins,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The Obama Justice Department is supposed to be an independent, nonpartisan law enforcement agency. Many Americans will be disturbed, though maybe not surprised, to find that Eric Holder’s Justice Department is colluding with one of the most leftist organizations in the nation. We know whose ‘side’ this Justice Department is on when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Fitton stated.
According to Ms. Farrell, Judicial Watch is representing Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070, pro bono in the Obama administration’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona law.
Last October, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to Arizona's SB 1070, which Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
Like the ACLU, the majority of judges sitting on the bench of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are far-left ideologues who hold the record for most overturned decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Written by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, February 7, 2011
How can Clinton continue to support Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood?
Oh well, Hillary slaps down Women again. She allowed her Slick Willie blowhard hubby to run wild on young women. How many other women were attacked by Boxcar Willie? The Left gives a pass and Hillary does her best Barry Soetoro impersonation and sits quietly as Radical Muslim Brotherhood Thugs attack. We have a great article below written by M Catharine Evans.
Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below written by M Catharine Evans
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.
From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:
How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.
It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N. The subjugation of women is fine as long as it serves the administration's political ends. Remember President Obama's 2009 Cairo speech where he promised the U.S. would defend Islamic religious teachings:
The US. Government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal."
In the same month the President spoke those words, the State Department set up an office for outreach to the Muslim Communities. Farah Pandith reported directly to Clinton who would "seek a new beginning with Muslims around the world." Did that include the Muslim Brotherhood determined to impose Sharia law around the world? Honor killings and harsh punishments for women emanate from the same law as the hijab. This from Pamela Geller:
Aset Magomadova leaves Calgary court Thursday July 15, 2010, after a judge sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova's killing of daughter Aminat.
Sharia law in Canada. That's all that this is. Period. Islam is crazy? Crazy like a fox?
Clinton is nothing more than an Obama knock-off in her alliance with Islamic groups. Instead of specifically denouncing the Muslim Brotherhood and any other sect that adheres to laws promoting the maiming and killing of girls, the former Senator is silent. Rather, she should refer her disillusioned supporter, Reverend Amy, to one of the many ‘it takes a village' speeches she has been asked to give over the years. In light of her recent stance on the Egyptian crisis, oppressed women under Islamist regimes definitely do not have an ally in Hillary Clinton.
Read more M.Catharine Evans at www.potterwilliamsreport.com
Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below written by M Catharine Evans
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.
From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:
How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.
It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N. The subjugation of women is fine as long as it serves the administration's political ends. Remember President Obama's 2009 Cairo speech where he promised the U.S. would defend Islamic religious teachings:
The US. Government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal."
In the same month the President spoke those words, the State Department set up an office for outreach to the Muslim Communities. Farah Pandith reported directly to Clinton who would "seek a new beginning with Muslims around the world." Did that include the Muslim Brotherhood determined to impose Sharia law around the world? Honor killings and harsh punishments for women emanate from the same law as the hijab. This from Pamela Geller:
Aset Magomadova leaves Calgary court Thursday July 15, 2010, after a judge sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova's killing of daughter Aminat.
Sharia law in Canada. That's all that this is. Period. Islam is crazy? Crazy like a fox?
Clinton is nothing more than an Obama knock-off in her alliance with Islamic groups. Instead of specifically denouncing the Muslim Brotherhood and any other sect that adheres to laws promoting the maiming and killing of girls, the former Senator is silent. Rather, she should refer her disillusioned supporter, Reverend Amy, to one of the many ‘it takes a village' speeches she has been asked to give over the years. In light of her recent stance on the Egyptian crisis, oppressed women under Islamist regimes definitely do not have an ally in Hillary Clinton.
Read more M.Catharine Evans at www.potterwilliamsreport.com
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
mosque,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Sunday, January 23, 2011
R. Lee Ermey

DOES HE HAVE A VOCABULARY OR WHAT....???
For the few of you who missed him, R. Lee Ermey is the host of The History Channel's "Mail Call" and played the Drill Instructor in the movie, "Full Metal Jacket." He is a retired Marine Gunnery Sergeant and a very plain speaker, as you will soon read. So, for your entertainment, here is Retired Marine Gunnery Sergeant R. Lee Ermey at his first press conference. The main topic of discussion is the Marine in Iraq who shot the Iraq insurgent to death.
We pick up as the reporter asks about how this potential war crime will affect our image in the world:
Ermey: "WHAT KIND OF A PANSY-ASSED QUESTION IS THAT?"
Reporter 1: "Well I think...."
Ermey: "THINK, FANCY BOY?! GET THIS THROUGH THAT SEPTIC TANK ON TOP OF YOUR SHOULDERS, MORON : I DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT YOU THINK, DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?? THAT MARINE SHOT AN ENEMY COMBATANT, SHITHEAD; SO GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS AND DEAL WITH IT BEFORE I MAKE YOU MY OWN PERSONAL PIN CUSHION!!!
NEXT QUESTION: YOU IN THE BLUE SUIT."
Reporter 2: Don't you think that the world's opinion of our operations is important?
Ermey: "OH SURE! YOU DON'T KNOW THE TIMES I HAVE CRIED MYSELF TO SLEEP WORRYING ABOUT WHAT SOME GODDAMNED FRENCH PANSY THINKS! OH THE DAYS I HAVE HAD TO WEEP BECAUSE SOME SHIT EATING TERRORIST SCUMBAG MIGHT BE MAD AT US, BECAUSE WE WENT INTO WHATEVER GOD FORSAKEN HOLE IN THE SHIT THAT HE LIVES IN AND KILLED HIM. WHAT THE HELL KIND OF DUMBASS QUESTION IS THAT YOU PETER-PUFFING JACKASS? WE ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AND WHEN YOU ATTACK US, WE ARE GOING TO COME TO YOUR HOUSE AND BLOW YOUR STINKING CAMEL-LICKING CARCASS INTO PIECES SO SMALL WE WILL BE ABLE TO BURY YOUR SORRY ASS IN A THIMBLE! YEAH, I KNOW WHAT YOU ARE THINKING. YOU ARE PROBABLY AFRAID, THINKING THAT I HAVE SUCH AN "EXTREME" ATTITUDE AND THAT I NEED TO BE MORE "SENSITIVE" TO OTHER PEOPLE'S FEELINGS. WELL LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING YOU POLE-SMOKING PANSY! I DON'T GIVE TWO SHITS WHAT YOU OR ANYBODY ELSE THINKS! THIS IS A DAMN WAR, AND IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THAT, THEN YOU SHOULD GO HOME AND SUCK ON MAMMA'S TIT! DO YOU HEAR ME YOU RUNT? NOW GET THE HELL OUT OF MY PRESS ROOM BEFORE I GO CRAZY AND BEAT THE LIVING SHIT OUT OF YOU!!
NEXT QUESTION: YOU WITH THE UGLY-ASSED TIE, LOOK AT THAT THING! IT IS HIDEOUS!"
Reporter 3: "Aren't you going against the freedom of the press by.."
Ermey: "FREEDOM? WHAT IN BLUE HELL DO YOU KNOW ABOUT FREEDOM? I HAVE SWEATED MY ASS OFF IN JUNGLES, WHILE BEING SHOT AT FOR THIS NATION! WHAT IN THE HELL HAVE YOU DONE YOU LITTLE SHIT-SUCKING WEASEL? WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU PUT YOUR ASS ON THE LINE FOR ANYTHING? AND YET YOU HAVE THE UNMITIGATED TEMERITY TO SHOW UP HERE AND MONDAY-MORNING QUARTERBACK THE ACTIONS OF A BRAVE MARINE, WHO WAS DEFENDING HIMSELF AND HIS UNIT FROM AN ATTACK BY SOME MURDEROUS AL-QUEDA SYMPATHIZER!! YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT, NUMB-NUTS? I AM CONCERNED ABOUT A BUNCH OF GRABASSTIC, ORGANIZED MORONS WITH CAMERAS AND MICROPHONES DOING THEIR BEST TO PORTRAY OUR BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN AS WAR CRIMINALS! I AM CONCERNED ABOUT CHICKEN-SHIT PANSIES THAT WANT US TO NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS AND WHINE ABOUT THEIR PISS-ANT "FREEDOMS"!!
Reporter 3: "I ..."
Ermey: "DID YOU HAVE A BIG BOWL OF STUPID FOR BREAKFAST THIS MORNING, NUMBNUTS? I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANOTHER WORD OUT OF THAT COMMIE CRY HOLE IN THAT SHIT-PILE YOU CALL A HEAD! AND THAT GOES TRIPLE FOR THE REST OF YOU PANSY-ASSED MORONS! NOW GET THE HELL OUT OF MY PRESS ROOM BEFORE I SHOVE MY BOOT SO FAR UP YOUR ASS THAT YOU CHOKE TO DEATH ON MY SHOELACES!!!!"
Marine DI's have a language all their own. God bless them all .
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)