Showing posts with label Illegal-Alien. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illegal-Alien. Show all posts
Friday, March 20, 2015
Immigration Revisions as seen from Orange County, Florida
ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA
For some reason, people have difficulty structuring their arguments when arguing against supporting the currently proposed immigration revisions. This lady made the argument pretty simple. NOT printed in the Orange County Paper!
Newspapers simply won't publish letters to the editor which they either deem politically incorrect (read below) or which do not agree with the philosophy they're pushing on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been published; but, with your help, it will get published via cyberspace!
From: "David LaBonte"
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which, of course, was not printed. So, I decided to "print" it myself by sending it out on the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register:
Dear Editor:
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good-bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.
Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought alongside men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France and Japan. None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people.
When we liberated France, no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German-American or the Irish-American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty, it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.
(signed)
Rosemary LaBonte
KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING. FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET!! LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!!
I sincerely hope this letter gets read by millions of people all across the nation!
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
David-LaBonte,
Florida,
Hitler,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Aliens,
Mr-I,
Mussolini,
Orange-County,
Rosemary-LaBonte
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Korea's New Leader
I am really concerned about North Korea 's appointment of the "dear leader", Kim Jung Ill's youngest son to be the new leader of North Korea-- a nuclear power!
After all, Kim Jung Un (pronounced Kim's young-un?) had NO military experience whatsoever before daddy made him a four-star general in the military. This is a snot-nose twerp who has never accomplished anything in his life that would even come close to military leadership: he hasn't even so much as led a cub scout troop, coached a sports team or commanded a military platoon... ...So, setting that aside, next they make him the "beloved leader" of the country. Terrific!!!
Ooops. Oh, crap! I'm sorry. I just remembered that we did the same thing here. We took a community organizer who has never worn a uniform and made him Commander-in-Chief; a guy who has never led anything more than an ACORN demonstration and made him the leader of this country. I'm sorry I brought this up, never mind. Let us suffer the pain because of the ignorant Democrats shoving this Marxist Leader on America.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
barry-soetoro-against-USA,
Hussein-Obama,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Aliens,
Korea,
left-wing-racists,
New-Leader
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Why Do Liberals Hate America?
If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot!
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Hussein-Obama,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrant,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberal-Racist,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
sharia-law,
Stop-Marxism
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Dirty Obamas Take Your Money
The sleazy Community Organizer and his Food Nazi Wife take your money and want more. They want taxes raised so they can take your money and give small amounts o the poor. Then they take your money and travel. All the while they spit on Middle CLass America. The Dirty Obamas eat the most expensive foods and the fattiest foods and they tell you to eat organic veggies. The Dirty Obamas tell you to drive some tiny Death Trap American car while they take Private Jets, Foreign Made Buses and Limousines. Yes they want to live like Billionaires with the Party's and keep America on the Plantation. Slave Owner B. Hussein Obama deserves nothing from America but a pink slip.
Dirty Obamas Working The System
Wow, she must have been really good at her job.
At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post, January 24, 2009, was a column entitled, "Replacing Michelle" in the National Review, The Week.
Here it is as it appeared:
"Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical Center hired her in 2002 to run 'programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting'.
In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 - nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator.
Her husband, Barak Obama, had just become a U.S. Senator. He requested a $1 million "Earmark" for the UC Medical Center. Way to network, Michelle!
Now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?
Let me add that Michelle's position was a part-time, 20-hours-a-week job.
My thoughts: How did this bit of "quid pro quo" (scratch my back - I'll scratch yours) corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin's garbage and kindergarten files?
I hope this is forwarded so many times that the media will HAVE to cover it..
Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.
Depression is when you lose your job.
Recovery is when Obama loses his job!
Dirty Obamas Working The System
Wow, she must have been really good at her job.
At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post, January 24, 2009, was a column entitled, "Replacing Michelle" in the National Review, The Week.
Here it is as it appeared:
"Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical Center hired her in 2002 to run 'programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting'.
In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 - nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator.
Her husband, Barak Obama, had just become a U.S. Senator. He requested a $1 million "Earmark" for the UC Medical Center. Way to network, Michelle!
Now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?
Let me add that Michelle's position was a part-time, 20-hours-a-week job.
My thoughts: How did this bit of "quid pro quo" (scratch my back - I'll scratch yours) corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin's garbage and kindergarten files?
I hope this is forwarded so many times that the media will HAVE to cover it..
Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.
Depression is when you lose your job.
Recovery is when Obama loses his job!
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Holder has No Interest in Hate Crimes Against Whites
Rush read this excellent article below. If the attackers were all white on black well the Frauds who call themselves the Main Stream Media would be outraged. Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of whites.
The Mob Tears at the Foundations of Civilization in London and America
Porion below written by the great J. Christian Adams.
Watching London burn, one cannot help but sense something has gone awry in the west. London, the cradle of our law, spins toward lawlessness.
The law, the steady framework of our civilization, seems incapable of response. Americans don’t have the luxury anymore of watching the anarchy on television, assuming distance insulates us from the Mob-prowling neighborhoods like Camberwell and Tottenham. The howling rage has even come to our own Midwest.
Hopefully time and wisdom will reveal what has fractured, but for now, we are certain of some things.
We know that the House of Reeves in Croydon, South London, is a pile of ash and rubble. This furniture business had been in the Reeves family for 141 years, surviving even Hitler’s blitz. But the Mob burned it down. “I'm the fifth generation to run this place,” said owner Graham Reeves, “I have two daughters. They would have been the sixth.” It was a fixture in Croydon, which may have been its doom. The Mob loves to devour the fixtures of civilization. The Mob also delights in the destruction of a father’s dream for his daughter. We’ll return shortly to why this may be.
We know that the Mob is forcing victims to undress, to turn over family heirlooms such as wedding rings. We know the weapon of choice for this British Mob is fire.
We now sense that the British government is hopeless. A government that as recently as 1970 made “arson in a royal dockyard” a hanging offense dithers over whether to employ water cannons against the Mob. Americans who, for generations endearingly considered England a model of civility and decorum, know something must have failed catastrophically, but what?
We also now know the Mob has visited America in recent days and years.
Consider the Wisconsin State Fair last week. The 911 tapes reveal a nightmare. “We’re outside the Wisconsin State Fair and there’s a white guy being beaten up by about 100 black people,” the panicked caller cries. “They’re jumping on our cars. . . . My mom just got attacked by a black mob.” Multiple eyewitnesses describe white fairgoers being pulled from cars and beaten by the Mob, all black. The evidence establishes a strong presumption that race was a motivating factor in the attacks. This is America?
Like in England, the law is also failing the victims in Wisconsin. “My wife comes home with a fricking black eye, and you guys ain't doin' (expletive) about it?” another 911 caller complains. “You need to get the (expletive) riot squad over there and haul them off to jail.”
We know that something similar happened in the town of California, Pennsylvania this year. We know that Darnell Harding, a linebacker for the local college football team, and Toni Whiteleather, a defensive back, were charged with attacking Michael Chambers. Chambers was an innocent bystander who had the misfortune of running into the two athletes just before Harding, the linebacker, said he was going to “hit the first white person he saw.”
As in London, the law has failed Chambers. Prosecutors dropped the state hate crimes charges in June after they failed to subpoena the victim to give evidence for a preliminary hearing. The Obama administration has also failed Chambers, as we shall see.
The law has failed Marty Marshall and his Akron, Ohio, family. On the Fourth of July in 2009, he was watching fireworks in his front yard with his wife and children. A mob of 30 to 50 black teenagers went onto his property and beat up Marshall, his wife, his children and two adult male friends. “This is our world. This is a black world,” they taunted the injured victims. Marshall spent five nights hospitalized in critical care.
Of course there are federal hate crimes laws designed for these violent racially motivated attacks, right? But a law is only as good as the people enforcing it. The Justice Department under Eric Holder has little interest in bringing hate crimes charges to protect white victims. The corrupt dismissal of the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, which I brought, made that plain.
The criminal section of the civil rights division has the responsibility to prosecute racially motivated violence. But Mark Kappelhoff, the chief of the criminal section of the civil rights division, is unlikely to act if the victims are white. He was angry that the DOJ enforced the law on behalf of white victims in the voting rights case of United States v. Ike Brown. According to the sworn testimony of former voting section chief Christopher Coates, Kappelhoff complained equal enforcement of the law to protect whites was causing problems with “its relations with civil rights groups.” He placed greater importance on political relations with civil rights groups than ending discrimination against white voters.
Through Kappelhoff’s attitude, we gain insight into a worldview that excuses wrongdoers because of whom they victimize. We glimpse the opening passages of a rotted storyline with tragic final chapters.
The Mob thrives off such moral equivocation. The Mob is decisive when the law is not.
To some, the Mob is a symptom of disenfranchisement, urban malaise or institutional hurt feelings. The Mob, after all, only awoke after a questionable police shooting in London. Excuses all, of course. Nothing justifies this behavior in nations built on the rule of law. Excuses are paralyzing those with the responsibility of enforcing the law, both in England and the United States.
Let’s return to the question of why. Many have absolute confidence about what we are witnessing. They can surely imagine the whispers of Wormwood to a thousand Patients. Delighted that the Mob has bypassed the gradual path toward evil, they can imagine him basking in the heat of burning double deckers in Peckham. They know who delights in a father’s dream for his daughter destroyed. Others perhaps imagine Legion, who admits in the Gospel of Mark, “We are many,” before being cast into the maniacal herd of pigs by Christ. No longer simply pigs, the maniacal herd for our times now roams London and stalks families in Milwaukee and Akron.
Whatever has fractured, whatever has failed, we need to discover and right it. Law, informed by a reverence for human dignity, has lifted our nation, our civilization, out of the darkness of history. The mayhem and violence we are witnessing provides a glimpse of an uncivilized age beyond our memory, before law ruled.
Perhaps the civilized will outnumber the uncivilized. Or, perhaps the burning and looting provides instead a preview of our future.
Sir Winston Churchill understood this. “Civilization will not last,” he said at the University of Bristol in 1938, “freedom will not survive, peace will not be kept, unless a very large majority of mankind unite together to defend them and show themselves possessed of a constabulary power before which barbaric and atavistic forces will stand in awe.”
That we have a President that contemptuously expelled this great man’s bust from the Oval Office only increases our task.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor J. Christian Adams is an election lawyer who served in the Voting Rights Section at the U.S. Department of Justice. His forthcoming book Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department (Regnery) releases in October. His website is www.electionlawcenter.com.
The Mob Tears at the Foundations of Civilization in London and America
Porion below written by the great J. Christian Adams.
Watching London burn, one cannot help but sense something has gone awry in the west. London, the cradle of our law, spins toward lawlessness.
The law, the steady framework of our civilization, seems incapable of response. Americans don’t have the luxury anymore of watching the anarchy on television, assuming distance insulates us from the Mob-prowling neighborhoods like Camberwell and Tottenham. The howling rage has even come to our own Midwest.
Hopefully time and wisdom will reveal what has fractured, but for now, we are certain of some things.
We know that the House of Reeves in Croydon, South London, is a pile of ash and rubble. This furniture business had been in the Reeves family for 141 years, surviving even Hitler’s blitz. But the Mob burned it down. “I'm the fifth generation to run this place,” said owner Graham Reeves, “I have two daughters. They would have been the sixth.” It was a fixture in Croydon, which may have been its doom. The Mob loves to devour the fixtures of civilization. The Mob also delights in the destruction of a father’s dream for his daughter. We’ll return shortly to why this may be.
We know that the Mob is forcing victims to undress, to turn over family heirlooms such as wedding rings. We know the weapon of choice for this British Mob is fire.
We now sense that the British government is hopeless. A government that as recently as 1970 made “arson in a royal dockyard” a hanging offense dithers over whether to employ water cannons against the Mob. Americans who, for generations endearingly considered England a model of civility and decorum, know something must have failed catastrophically, but what?
We also now know the Mob has visited America in recent days and years.
Consider the Wisconsin State Fair last week. The 911 tapes reveal a nightmare. “We’re outside the Wisconsin State Fair and there’s a white guy being beaten up by about 100 black people,” the panicked caller cries. “They’re jumping on our cars. . . . My mom just got attacked by a black mob.” Multiple eyewitnesses describe white fairgoers being pulled from cars and beaten by the Mob, all black. The evidence establishes a strong presumption that race was a motivating factor in the attacks. This is America?
Like in England, the law is also failing the victims in Wisconsin. “My wife comes home with a fricking black eye, and you guys ain't doin' (expletive) about it?” another 911 caller complains. “You need to get the (expletive) riot squad over there and haul them off to jail.”
We know that something similar happened in the town of California, Pennsylvania this year. We know that Darnell Harding, a linebacker for the local college football team, and Toni Whiteleather, a defensive back, were charged with attacking Michael Chambers. Chambers was an innocent bystander who had the misfortune of running into the two athletes just before Harding, the linebacker, said he was going to “hit the first white person he saw.”
As in London, the law has failed Chambers. Prosecutors dropped the state hate crimes charges in June after they failed to subpoena the victim to give evidence for a preliminary hearing. The Obama administration has also failed Chambers, as we shall see.
The law has failed Marty Marshall and his Akron, Ohio, family. On the Fourth of July in 2009, he was watching fireworks in his front yard with his wife and children. A mob of 30 to 50 black teenagers went onto his property and beat up Marshall, his wife, his children and two adult male friends. “This is our world. This is a black world,” they taunted the injured victims. Marshall spent five nights hospitalized in critical care.
Of course there are federal hate crimes laws designed for these violent racially motivated attacks, right? But a law is only as good as the people enforcing it. The Justice Department under Eric Holder has little interest in bringing hate crimes charges to protect white victims. The corrupt dismissal of the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, which I brought, made that plain.
The criminal section of the civil rights division has the responsibility to prosecute racially motivated violence. But Mark Kappelhoff, the chief of the criminal section of the civil rights division, is unlikely to act if the victims are white. He was angry that the DOJ enforced the law on behalf of white victims in the voting rights case of United States v. Ike Brown. According to the sworn testimony of former voting section chief Christopher Coates, Kappelhoff complained equal enforcement of the law to protect whites was causing problems with “its relations with civil rights groups.” He placed greater importance on political relations with civil rights groups than ending discrimination against white voters.
Through Kappelhoff’s attitude, we gain insight into a worldview that excuses wrongdoers because of whom they victimize. We glimpse the opening passages of a rotted storyline with tragic final chapters.
The Mob thrives off such moral equivocation. The Mob is decisive when the law is not.
To some, the Mob is a symptom of disenfranchisement, urban malaise or institutional hurt feelings. The Mob, after all, only awoke after a questionable police shooting in London. Excuses all, of course. Nothing justifies this behavior in nations built on the rule of law. Excuses are paralyzing those with the responsibility of enforcing the law, both in England and the United States.
Let’s return to the question of why. Many have absolute confidence about what we are witnessing. They can surely imagine the whispers of Wormwood to a thousand Patients. Delighted that the Mob has bypassed the gradual path toward evil, they can imagine him basking in the heat of burning double deckers in Peckham. They know who delights in a father’s dream for his daughter destroyed. Others perhaps imagine Legion, who admits in the Gospel of Mark, “We are many,” before being cast into the maniacal herd of pigs by Christ. No longer simply pigs, the maniacal herd for our times now roams London and stalks families in Milwaukee and Akron.
Whatever has fractured, whatever has failed, we need to discover and right it. Law, informed by a reverence for human dignity, has lifted our nation, our civilization, out of the darkness of history. The mayhem and violence we are witnessing provides a glimpse of an uncivilized age beyond our memory, before law ruled.
Perhaps the civilized will outnumber the uncivilized. Or, perhaps the burning and looting provides instead a preview of our future.
Sir Winston Churchill understood this. “Civilization will not last,” he said at the University of Bristol in 1938, “freedom will not survive, peace will not be kept, unless a very large majority of mankind unite together to defend them and show themselves possessed of a constabulary power before which barbaric and atavistic forces will stand in awe.”
That we have a President that contemptuously expelled this great man’s bust from the Oval Office only increases our task.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor J. Christian Adams is an election lawyer who served in the Voting Rights Section at the U.S. Department of Justice. His forthcoming book Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department (Regnery) releases in October. His website is www.electionlawcenter.com.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
mosque,
racist-eric-holder,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Reclaim America - Fire Barry
Obama now is crying, but not for the Texas teenage girl whom was raped and murdered; Obama cries for the animal Humberto Leal. Obama and the Left Wing Democrats are set up to do severe damage to America.
The aim of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, Moveon.org, the Center for American Progress, the Media Matters for America and other such extremist left-wing organizations is to destroy Capitalism and America as we know it. Even CAIR attempts to use America’s freedoms as a weapon against her. All the while the Appeaser in Chief (BHO) supports these wacko groups, as he flies all over the World spending our money. It is time to Wake Up America!
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Top 12 Reasons People Vote Democrat
When someone cannot explain why they voted for Democrats, give them this list. They can then pick their reasons from this "TOP 12"...
1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of
spending the money I earn than I would.
3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is
offended by it.
4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.
8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.
9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.
11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised "HOPE AND CHANGE" from Sharia Barry.
12. I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my arse, it's
unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.
Yes the Democrats must be punished at the Polls for years to come! They sat by and let this unvetted Community Organizer Thug in as their Candidate. The Democrats never saw his full birth certificate until Trump had the backbone and forced the issue. Hillary and her Camp were the ones to question the ACORN Community Organizer's birth place. Don't you still find it odd that his Grandmother and his so-called Wife, the FOOD NAZI said he was from Kenya? I digress, so any Independents who felt the need for self-loathing and White Guilt trips learned in Public Schools and ultimately voted for this ACORN Thug, well you are guilty also!
1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of
spending the money I earn than I would.
3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is
offended by it.
4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.
8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.
9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.
11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised "HOPE AND CHANGE" from Sharia Barry.
12. I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my arse, it's
unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.
Yes the Democrats must be punished at the Polls for years to come! They sat by and let this unvetted Community Organizer Thug in as their Candidate. The Democrats never saw his full birth certificate until Trump had the backbone and forced the issue. Hillary and her Camp were the ones to question the ACORN Community Organizer's birth place. Don't you still find it odd that his Grandmother and his so-called Wife, the FOOD NAZI said he was from Kenya? I digress, so any Independents who felt the need for self-loathing and White Guilt trips learned in Public Schools and ultimately voted for this ACORN Thug, well you are guilty also!
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Obama Playing Golf At This Time Is Totally Inappropriate
Donald Trump: President Obama Playing Golf At This Time Is "Totally Inappropriate"
Obama, You're FIRED! Let's wake up America!
Donald Trump explains we DO NEED Nuclear energy. The Japan situation is devastating. However, their systems are outdated. We wish the best to Japan.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-Lies,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, March 14, 2011
Put Me In Charge!
Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no
cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and
beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away.
If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.
Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and
piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get
tats and piercings, then get a job.
Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360,
then get a job and your own place.
In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week
or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the
roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we
find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and
your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."
Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all
of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self
esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone
else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning, and
definitely lowered self esteem!
(If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least
attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system
rewards them for continuing to make bad choices).
AND while you are on Government subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. As
long as you are receiving a Government welfare check, you will be removed from the voter registration roles. If you want to vote, then get a job!
cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and
beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away.
If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.
Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and
piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get
tats and piercings, then get a job.
Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360,
then get a job and your own place.
In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week
or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the
roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we
find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and
your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."
Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all
of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self
esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone
else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning, and
definitely lowered self esteem!
(If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least
attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system
rewards them for continuing to make bad choices).
AND while you are on Government subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. As
long as you are receiving a Government welfare check, you will be removed from the voter registration roles. If you want to vote, then get a job!
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-Lies,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law
Sunday, March 6, 2011
The Community Organizer Gives Unions Cover for Corruption
This is a STOP MARXISM, “Must See Video” about The TOTUS, B. Hussein Obama and the Union THUGS. It seems for all the good President Bush did to fight corruption in the Unions, it has gone to waste with this Marxist Regime. Obama and his HenchMan, Deborah Greenfield, are out to see Fat Union Bosses prosper big time and the “Working Man” lose jobs and money. I would describe it as shocking however with this current Marxist Regime, it is no surprise. All in a days work for a Anti-American Community Organizer.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
One Mexico Border Town Had More Civilian Casualties Last Year Than All Afghanistan
When will American Liberals wake up! As the Mexican President says, their hatred for America is growing. Mexico does not allow an Illegal Aliens in their Country yet they want America to bow to Illegal Aliens. Enough already. Janet Big Sis is so far gone, she should check into the nearest Mexican Rehab Center.
Below is a very informative article from the great CNSNews.com.
One U.S-Mexico Border Town Had More Civilian Casualties Last Year Than All Afghanistan
Portion below written by Edwin Mora
(CNSNews.com) - One U.S.-Mexico border town had more civilian casualties in its drug war last year than Afghanistan had in its entire country.
In Ciudad Juarez, Mexico--which sits across the Rio Grande River from El Paso, Texas—3,111 civilians were murdered in 2010. In all of the territory of Afghanistan, where U.S. forces are at war with Taliban insurgents, there 2,421 civilians were killed
More civilians were killed last year in Ciudad Juarez, the Mexican city across the border from El Paso, Texas, than were killed in all of Afghanistan.
There were 3,111 civilians murdered in the city of Juarez in 2010 and 2,421 in the entire country of Afghanistan—the majority of them by anti-government forces including the Taliban.
About one out of every 427 civilian inhabitants was killed in Juarez last year, while about one out of every 12,029 civilian inhabitants was killed in Afghanistan. (There are 1,328,017 people in Juarez, according to Mexico’s 2010 census, and 29,121,286 people in Afghanistant, according to the CIA’s World Factbook.)
The number of civilians killed in Afghanistan was compiled by the Congressional Research Service and published in a CRS report released on Feb. 3. The number of civilians killed in Juarez was compiled by Molly Molloy, a research librarian at New Mexico State University who maintains a count of murders Juarez and published it on the Frontera List Web site. Molloy’s work on civilian murders in Juarez was also referenced in a recent CRS report on Mexican drug cartels.
Much of the violence in Juárez is sparked by drug trafficking organizations battling over one of the major smuggling corridors into the United States.
The CRS said that of the 2,421 civilians killed in Afghanistan in 2010, more than 60 percent were killed by “anti-government elements, which include the Taliban and other individuals or groups who engage in armed conflict with the government of Afghanistan or members of the International Military Forces.”
“Pro-government forces caused 21% of the total civilian deaths,” said CRS.
By Edwin Mora
Below is a very informative article from the great CNSNews.com.
One U.S-Mexico Border Town Had More Civilian Casualties Last Year Than All Afghanistan
Portion below written by Edwin Mora
(CNSNews.com) - One U.S.-Mexico border town had more civilian casualties in its drug war last year than Afghanistan had in its entire country.
In Ciudad Juarez, Mexico--which sits across the Rio Grande River from El Paso, Texas—3,111 civilians were murdered in 2010. In all of the territory of Afghanistan, where U.S. forces are at war with Taliban insurgents, there 2,421 civilians were killed
More civilians were killed last year in Ciudad Juarez, the Mexican city across the border from El Paso, Texas, than were killed in all of Afghanistan.
There were 3,111 civilians murdered in the city of Juarez in 2010 and 2,421 in the entire country of Afghanistan—the majority of them by anti-government forces including the Taliban.
About one out of every 427 civilian inhabitants was killed in Juarez last year, while about one out of every 12,029 civilian inhabitants was killed in Afghanistan. (There are 1,328,017 people in Juarez, according to Mexico’s 2010 census, and 29,121,286 people in Afghanistant, according to the CIA’s World Factbook.)
The number of civilians killed in Afghanistan was compiled by the Congressional Research Service and published in a CRS report released on Feb. 3. The number of civilians killed in Juarez was compiled by Molly Molloy, a research librarian at New Mexico State University who maintains a count of murders Juarez and published it on the Frontera List Web site. Molloy’s work on civilian murders in Juarez was also referenced in a recent CRS report on Mexican drug cartels.
Much of the violence in Juárez is sparked by drug trafficking organizations battling over one of the major smuggling corridors into the United States.
The CRS said that of the 2,421 civilians killed in Afghanistan in 2010, more than 60 percent were killed by “anti-government elements, which include the Taliban and other individuals or groups who engage in armed conflict with the government of Afghanistan or members of the International Military Forces.”
“Pro-government forces caused 21% of the total civilian deaths,” said CRS.
By Edwin Mora
Labels:
Arizona,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Janet-Napolitano,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism
Friday, March 4, 2011
Border Agent Was FORCED TO USE BEANBAGS Against Armed Mexican Killers in AZ Before He Was Shot Dead
How many of our Patriotic Americans have to DIE before we get serious about the Border problem. If these people only want to pick lettuce and fruit, then why in hell do they have so many guns? Illegal Aliens kill our Border Patrol Agents and Police at the drop of a hat. Our new President in 2012 MUST be a Conservative and attack the Border problem. Meanwhile we have this lowlife Mexican president scolding us, Americans? And people like Barry Soetoro and Paul McCartney kiss his dirty behind? Liberals are sick and twisted!
Below is a great post from Gateway Pundit.
The outrageous rumors were true.
Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was forced to use beanbags against armed Mexican killers before he was shot dead in Arizona in December.
Agent Brian Terry was forced to defend himself and this country with beanbags.
The Arizona Daily Star reported:
Border Patrol agents shot beanbags at a group of suspected bandits before the men returned fire during a confrontation in a remote canyon, killing agent Brian Terry with a single gunshot, records show.
And an illegal immigrant wounded in the gunbattle who is now the only person in custody linked to the slaying contends he never fired a shot, according to FBI search warrant requests filed in the U.S. District Court in Tucson.
The documents provide the most detailed version yet of what happened in the deadly gunbattle Dec. 14 in Peck Canyon, northwest of Nogales.
The documents say the group of illegal border entrants refused commands to drop their weapons after agents confronted them at about 11:15 p.m. Two agents fired beanbags at the migrants, who responded with gunfire. Two agents returned fire, one with a long gun and one with a pistol, but Terry was mortally wounded in the gunfight.
Border Patrol officials declined to answer questions about protocol for use of force, citing the ongoing investigation.
But Terry’s brother, Kent Terry, said the other agents who were there that night told him that they were instructed to use the non-lethal beanbags first. It’s a policy that doesn’t make sense to Kent Terry.
“You go up against a bandit crew that is carrying AKs, and you walk out there with guns loaded with beanbags – I don’t get it,” Terry said in a phone interview from Michigan. “It’s like going to the Iraqi war with one knife. It boggles my mind. … These guys (Border Patrol agents) are professionals; they should be able to use their judgment call on their own.”
But, don’t worry.
Barack Obama says the border is as safe today as it’s ever been.
Below is a great post from Gateway Pundit.
The outrageous rumors were true.
Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was forced to use beanbags against armed Mexican killers before he was shot dead in Arizona in December.
Agent Brian Terry was forced to defend himself and this country with beanbags.
The Arizona Daily Star reported:
Border Patrol agents shot beanbags at a group of suspected bandits before the men returned fire during a confrontation in a remote canyon, killing agent Brian Terry with a single gunshot, records show.
And an illegal immigrant wounded in the gunbattle who is now the only person in custody linked to the slaying contends he never fired a shot, according to FBI search warrant requests filed in the U.S. District Court in Tucson.
The documents provide the most detailed version yet of what happened in the deadly gunbattle Dec. 14 in Peck Canyon, northwest of Nogales.
The documents say the group of illegal border entrants refused commands to drop their weapons after agents confronted them at about 11:15 p.m. Two agents fired beanbags at the migrants, who responded with gunfire. Two agents returned fire, one with a long gun and one with a pistol, but Terry was mortally wounded in the gunfight.
Border Patrol officials declined to answer questions about protocol for use of force, citing the ongoing investigation.
But Terry’s brother, Kent Terry, said the other agents who were there that night told him that they were instructed to use the non-lethal beanbags first. It’s a policy that doesn’t make sense to Kent Terry.
“You go up against a bandit crew that is carrying AKs, and you walk out there with guns loaded with beanbags – I don’t get it,” Terry said in a phone interview from Michigan. “It’s like going to the Iraqi war with one knife. It boggles my mind. … These guys (Border Patrol agents) are professionals; they should be able to use their judgment call on their own.”
But, don’t worry.
Barack Obama says the border is as safe today as it’s ever been.
Labels:
Arizona,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law
Thursday, March 3, 2011
The Twisted Left Wing and their Misogynistic Ways
We continue to see the Left Wing Liberals with their misogynistic ways and racist behavior. The Liberals want to keep minorities down, so minorities depend on the Large, Obese Government. Oh, the Left Wing Nazis will support a few minorities who make music or play sports, to make money. Then they turn around and push a worthless Community Organizer to the highest position. Is the Left cleansed of their racist ways now after promoting a D Student? Hardly. The Politically Correct plan of Marxists is well under way to destroy America.
Look at how when Lara Logan was being beaten and raped, the Muslim Brotherhood shouted "Jew, Jew, Jew". This was a horrible event yet many Liberals support the Muslim Brotherhood. When Liberal Women are under the thumb of Sharia Law, will they blame BUSH?
Below is an outstanding article by Robin of Berkeley. Robin of Berkeley is a regular at the AmericanThinker. The AmericanThinker.com is a life saver for common sense Conservatives.
If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention
One of the reasons I drifted so far left was because of a constant sense of outrage. It was like a steady drumbeat in my head: Capitalism? Patently unfair! Unequal pay for women? Outrageous!
Of course, out here in Berkeley, I was in good company, surrounded by the multitudes up in arms most hours of the day. There's even a popular bumper sticker around town that captures the general vibe: If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention.
However, once I snapped out of my leftist trance, I realized something startling: I was outraged about all of the wrong things. In fact, leftist outrage is derived not from our Higher Selves, but from another place entirely: the lowly self.
This explains why the left can be so apoplectic one minute, and then strangely silent the next. Take, for example, the mass slaughter of our soldiers at Fort Hood. Obama didn't even interrupt his Native American shout-out to denounce the killings.
We hardly hear a peep these days about Ft. Hood, the infiltration of our military (!) by a Jihadist. I recently referred to the atrocity when speaking to a progressive friend; she could barely recall what I was talking about. Yet, when a lone, apparently psychotic young man, created a bloodbath in Tucson, the left was all over this one.
The outrage about Tucson was fast and furious, with fingers pointed directly rightward. The Tea Parties and Sarah Palin were vilified by the MSM and progressive bloggers.
And, yet, when Palin defended herself by labeling the blame game a "blood libel," we all witnessed what happened. People went ballistic; they were outraged!
And now comes the latest abomination, a maniacal mob repeatedly sexually assaulting and beating CBS correspondent, Lara Logan. Logan's ordeal, her abject horror, appears to have fallen on deaf ears. Most of our leaders have barely uttered a peep.
This is no surprise. As I've written many times before, the left considers the abuse of women collateral damage in their revolutionary battles. Another reason for the silence? The savagery threatens to spoil the pristine image of the Egyptian hoodlums as "freedom fighters."
Lara Logan is a well-known journalist; but every day, anonymous Muslim women are stoned, genitally mutilated, and murdered. The madness has infiltrated our country with the beheading of a Muslim woman by her husband. And yet is CNN or Court TV running 24 hour coverage of the trial? Of course not; these events fail to outrage.
The left's outrage is not completely real; it is manufactured; contrived. The faux outrage is as fabricated as those feel-good slogans about Hope and Change.
The left's legendary compassion is politically expedient, though elaborately disguised. Brutalization of journalists, a Jihad against our soldiers...and yet, so little outrage. There is no currency in these events; in fact, they must be swept under the rug to hide the truth about the "Religion of Peace."
But notice how Don't Ask, Don't Tell inflames the masses. Watch sparks fly in the battle for gay marriage. Wisconsin is exploding because unionized teachers want collective bargaining. The left's outrage is self-righteous because it is laser focused on the self.
Not only is the left's outrage ego-based, but it is rooted in greed. Take the left's centerpiece issue, social and economic justice. What do those flowery phrases actually mean, anyway? Aren't they just doublespeak for envy, coveting one's neighbor, and a gimme-gimme mentality?
When an injustice serves progressive ideology, we see the outrage in full-color display. However, at other times, the silence is deafening -- or there is disingenuous posturing.
As Lara Logan recovers from her wounds, President Carter assures us that we have nothing to fear from the Muslim Brotherhood. But why shouldn't we be fearful? Haven't we just seen what this assembly of brothers is capable of doing?
As of this writing, Obama has not yet issued a public statement condemning the violence in Egypt against Lara Logan and other journalists. However, Obama did deliver a fiery speech, where he accused the Republicans in Wisconsin of an "assault on unions."
He sounded outraged.
A frequent American Thinker contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist and a recovering liberal in Berkeley.
Look at how when Lara Logan was being beaten and raped, the Muslim Brotherhood shouted "Jew, Jew, Jew". This was a horrible event yet many Liberals support the Muslim Brotherhood. When Liberal Women are under the thumb of Sharia Law, will they blame BUSH?
Below is an outstanding article by Robin of Berkeley. Robin of Berkeley is a regular at the AmericanThinker. The AmericanThinker.com is a life saver for common sense Conservatives.
If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention
One of the reasons I drifted so far left was because of a constant sense of outrage. It was like a steady drumbeat in my head: Capitalism? Patently unfair! Unequal pay for women? Outrageous!
Of course, out here in Berkeley, I was in good company, surrounded by the multitudes up in arms most hours of the day. There's even a popular bumper sticker around town that captures the general vibe: If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention.
However, once I snapped out of my leftist trance, I realized something startling: I was outraged about all of the wrong things. In fact, leftist outrage is derived not from our Higher Selves, but from another place entirely: the lowly self.
This explains why the left can be so apoplectic one minute, and then strangely silent the next. Take, for example, the mass slaughter of our soldiers at Fort Hood. Obama didn't even interrupt his Native American shout-out to denounce the killings.
We hardly hear a peep these days about Ft. Hood, the infiltration of our military (!) by a Jihadist. I recently referred to the atrocity when speaking to a progressive friend; she could barely recall what I was talking about. Yet, when a lone, apparently psychotic young man, created a bloodbath in Tucson, the left was all over this one.
The outrage about Tucson was fast and furious, with fingers pointed directly rightward. The Tea Parties and Sarah Palin were vilified by the MSM and progressive bloggers.
And, yet, when Palin defended herself by labeling the blame game a "blood libel," we all witnessed what happened. People went ballistic; they were outraged!
And now comes the latest abomination, a maniacal mob repeatedly sexually assaulting and beating CBS correspondent, Lara Logan. Logan's ordeal, her abject horror, appears to have fallen on deaf ears. Most of our leaders have barely uttered a peep.
This is no surprise. As I've written many times before, the left considers the abuse of women collateral damage in their revolutionary battles. Another reason for the silence? The savagery threatens to spoil the pristine image of the Egyptian hoodlums as "freedom fighters."
Lara Logan is a well-known journalist; but every day, anonymous Muslim women are stoned, genitally mutilated, and murdered. The madness has infiltrated our country with the beheading of a Muslim woman by her husband. And yet is CNN or Court TV running 24 hour coverage of the trial? Of course not; these events fail to outrage.
The left's outrage is not completely real; it is manufactured; contrived. The faux outrage is as fabricated as those feel-good slogans about Hope and Change.
The left's legendary compassion is politically expedient, though elaborately disguised. Brutalization of journalists, a Jihad against our soldiers...and yet, so little outrage. There is no currency in these events; in fact, they must be swept under the rug to hide the truth about the "Religion of Peace."
But notice how Don't Ask, Don't Tell inflames the masses. Watch sparks fly in the battle for gay marriage. Wisconsin is exploding because unionized teachers want collective bargaining. The left's outrage is self-righteous because it is laser focused on the self.
Not only is the left's outrage ego-based, but it is rooted in greed. Take the left's centerpiece issue, social and economic justice. What do those flowery phrases actually mean, anyway? Aren't they just doublespeak for envy, coveting one's neighbor, and a gimme-gimme mentality?
When an injustice serves progressive ideology, we see the outrage in full-color display. However, at other times, the silence is deafening -- or there is disingenuous posturing.
As Lara Logan recovers from her wounds, President Carter assures us that we have nothing to fear from the Muslim Brotherhood. But why shouldn't we be fearful? Haven't we just seen what this assembly of brothers is capable of doing?
As of this writing, Obama has not yet issued a public statement condemning the violence in Egypt against Lara Logan and other journalists. However, Obama did deliver a fiery speech, where he accused the Republicans in Wisconsin of an "assault on unions."
He sounded outraged.
A frequent American Thinker contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist and a recovering liberal in Berkeley.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Why can't Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Read Proficiently?
When the TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States) said "now is not the time to make profits", was that for the Unions too? The TOTUS is in everyone's business yet his budget and ideas are a disaster. It kind of reminds me of someone else, Food Nazi, who tells us what to eat and what not to eat but then she slams down junk food, and huge plates of ribs at every other meal.
We have some evidence below, from the excellent site, CNSNews.com, with results on the weasely Unions.
Two-Thirds of Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Can’t Read Proficiently—Despite Highest Per Pupil Spending in Midwest
Written By Terence P. Jeffrey
(CNSNews.com) - Two-thirds of the eighth graders in Wisconsin public schools cannot read proficiently according to the U.S. Department of Education, despite the fact that Wisconsin spends more per pupil in its public schools than any other state in the Midwest.
In the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests administered by the U.S. Department of Education in 2009—the latest year available—only 32 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned a “proficient” rating while another 2 percent earned an “advanced” rating. The other 66 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned ratings below “proficient,” including 44 percent who earned a rating of “basic” and 22 percent who earned a rating of “below basic.”
The test also showed that the reading abilities of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders had not improved at all between 1998 and 2009 despite a significant inflation-adjusted increase in the amount of money Wisconsin public schools spent per pupil each year.
In 1998, according to the U.S. Department of Education, Wisconsin public school eighth graders scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. In 2009, Wisconsin public school eighth graders once again scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. Meanwhile, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil expenditures from $4,956 per pupil in 1998 to 10,791 per pupil in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator the $4,956 Wisconsin spent per pupil in 1998 dollars equaled $6,546 in 2008 dollars. That means that from 1998 to 2008, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil spending by $4,245 in real terms yet did not add a single point to the reading scores of their eighth graders and still could lift only one-third of their eighth graders to at least a “proficient” level in reading.
The $10,791 that Wisconsin spent per pupil in its public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal year 2008 was more than any other state in the Midwest.
Neighboring Illinois spent $10,353 per student in 2008, Minnesota spent $10,048 per student; Iowa spent $9,520 per student. Among Midwest states, Nebraska was second to Wisconsin in per pupil spending in its public schools, spending $10,565 per student.
Of these nearby states, only Minnesota did slightly better teaching reading to its public school students. In 2009, 39 percent of eighth graders in Minnesota public schools earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score in the state was 270 out of 500.
In Illinois, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score was 265 out of 500. In Iowa, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score was 265 out of 500. In Nebraska, only 35 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in their public schools, and the average reading score was 267 out of 500.
Nationwide, only 30 percent of public school eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score on the NAEP test was 262 out of 500.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress explains its student rating system as follows: “Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance.”
In other words, despite the $10,791 that taxpayers were paying to educate students in Wisconsin public schools, two-thirds of eighth graders in those schools showed at best only a “partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work” at that grade level.
In fiscal 2008, the federal government provided $669.6 million in subsidies to the public schools in Wisconsin.
Written By Terence P. Jeffrey
We have some evidence below, from the excellent site, CNSNews.com, with results on the weasely Unions.
Two-Thirds of Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Can’t Read Proficiently—Despite Highest Per Pupil Spending in Midwest
Written By Terence P. Jeffrey
(CNSNews.com) - Two-thirds of the eighth graders in Wisconsin public schools cannot read proficiently according to the U.S. Department of Education, despite the fact that Wisconsin spends more per pupil in its public schools than any other state in the Midwest.
In the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests administered by the U.S. Department of Education in 2009—the latest year available—only 32 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned a “proficient” rating while another 2 percent earned an “advanced” rating. The other 66 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned ratings below “proficient,” including 44 percent who earned a rating of “basic” and 22 percent who earned a rating of “below basic.”
The test also showed that the reading abilities of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders had not improved at all between 1998 and 2009 despite a significant inflation-adjusted increase in the amount of money Wisconsin public schools spent per pupil each year.
In 1998, according to the U.S. Department of Education, Wisconsin public school eighth graders scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. In 2009, Wisconsin public school eighth graders once again scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. Meanwhile, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil expenditures from $4,956 per pupil in 1998 to 10,791 per pupil in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator the $4,956 Wisconsin spent per pupil in 1998 dollars equaled $6,546 in 2008 dollars. That means that from 1998 to 2008, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil spending by $4,245 in real terms yet did not add a single point to the reading scores of their eighth graders and still could lift only one-third of their eighth graders to at least a “proficient” level in reading.
The $10,791 that Wisconsin spent per pupil in its public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal year 2008 was more than any other state in the Midwest.
Neighboring Illinois spent $10,353 per student in 2008, Minnesota spent $10,048 per student; Iowa spent $9,520 per student. Among Midwest states, Nebraska was second to Wisconsin in per pupil spending in its public schools, spending $10,565 per student.
Of these nearby states, only Minnesota did slightly better teaching reading to its public school students. In 2009, 39 percent of eighth graders in Minnesota public schools earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score in the state was 270 out of 500.
In Illinois, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score was 265 out of 500. In Iowa, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score was 265 out of 500. In Nebraska, only 35 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in their public schools, and the average reading score was 267 out of 500.
Nationwide, only 30 percent of public school eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score on the NAEP test was 262 out of 500.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress explains its student rating system as follows: “Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance.”
In other words, despite the $10,791 that taxpayers were paying to educate students in Wisconsin public schools, two-thirds of eighth graders in those schools showed at best only a “partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work” at that grade level.
In fiscal 2008, the federal government provided $669.6 million in subsidies to the public schools in Wisconsin.
Written By Terence P. Jeffrey
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
"JESUS AND THE DEMOCRAT"
(I don't care what party you like, this one's funny!!)
A Republican, in a wheelchair, entered a restaurant one afternoon and asked the waitress for a cup of coffee. The Republican looked across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus sitting over there?"
The waitress nodded "yes," so the Republican requested that she give Jesus a cup of coffee, on him.
The next patron to come in was a Libertarian, with a hunched back. He shuffled over to a booth, painfully sat down, and asked the waitress for a cup of hot tea. He also glanced across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus, over there?"
The waitress nodded, so the Libertarian asked her to give Jesus a cup of hot tea, "My treat."
The third patron to come into the restaurant was a Democrat on crutches He hobbled over to a booth, sat down and hollered, "Hey there honey! How's about getting me a cold mug of Miller Light?" He too looked across the restaurant and asked, "Isn't that God's boy over there?
The waitress nodded, so the Democrat directed her to give Jesus a cold beer. "On my bill," he said loudly.
As Jesus got up to leave, he passed by the Republican, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Republican felt the strength come back into his legs, got up, and danced a jig out the door.
Jesus passed by the Libertarian, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Libertarian felt his back straightening up and he raised his hands, praised the Lord, and did a series of back flips out the door.
Then, Jesus walked towards the Democrat, just smiling.
The Democrat jumped up and yelled,
"Don't touch me ... I'm collecting disability."
Hat Tip to George
A Republican, in a wheelchair, entered a restaurant one afternoon and asked the waitress for a cup of coffee. The Republican looked across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus sitting over there?"
The waitress nodded "yes," so the Republican requested that she give Jesus a cup of coffee, on him.
The next patron to come in was a Libertarian, with a hunched back. He shuffled over to a booth, painfully sat down, and asked the waitress for a cup of hot tea. He also glanced across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus, over there?"
The waitress nodded, so the Libertarian asked her to give Jesus a cup of hot tea, "My treat."
The third patron to come into the restaurant was a Democrat on crutches He hobbled over to a booth, sat down and hollered, "Hey there honey! How's about getting me a cold mug of Miller Light?" He too looked across the restaurant and asked, "Isn't that God's boy over there?
The waitress nodded, so the Democrat directed her to give Jesus a cold beer. "On my bill," he said loudly.
As Jesus got up to leave, he passed by the Republican, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Republican felt the strength come back into his legs, got up, and danced a jig out the door.
Jesus passed by the Libertarian, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Libertarian felt his back straightening up and he raised his hands, praised the Lord, and did a series of back flips out the door.
Then, Jesus walked towards the Democrat, just smiling.
The Democrat jumped up and yelled,
"Don't touch me ... I'm collecting disability."
Hat Tip to George
Labels:
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-Lies,
Illegal-Alien,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Allen West Tears Up Soetoro at C.P.A.C.
This Guy is the Real Deal! He is the ANTI-Community Organizer. Barry Soetoro could not carry Allen West's socks.
Stand firm, for this is the dawn of a new America!
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans,
Video
Monday, February 14, 2011
WAKE Up America! Liberals Support Illegals, Not You!
My great great grandfather watched as his friends died in the Civil War, my grandfather watched as his friends died in WW II, and my father watched as my friends died in Vietnam .
None of them died for the Mexican Flag.
Everyone died for the U.S. flag.
In Texas , a student raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole; another student took it down. Guess who was expelled...the kid who took it down.
Kids in high school in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.
Enough is enough.
The below e-mail message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough.
I'm taking a stand.
I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the U.S. flag can't stand up.
And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
Let me make this perfectly clear!
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And, because I make This statement DOES NOT
Mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome! To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
And
6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you. If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM! When will AMERICANS STOP giving away THEIR RIGHTS???
We've gone so far the other way...
bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!
WAKE UP America!!!
If You agree.... Pass this on.
Hat Tip to B!
None of them died for the Mexican Flag.
Everyone died for the U.S. flag.
In Texas , a student raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole; another student took it down. Guess who was expelled...the kid who took it down.
Kids in high school in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.
Enough is enough.
The below e-mail message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough.
I'm taking a stand.
I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the U.S. flag can't stand up.
And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
Let me make this perfectly clear!
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And, because I make This statement DOES NOT
Mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE, IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome! To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
And
6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you. If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Then YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM! When will AMERICANS STOP giving away THEIR RIGHTS???
We've gone so far the other way...
bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!
WAKE UP America!!!
If You agree.... Pass this on.
Hat Tip to B!
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Why Does Barry Hussein Hate Arizona?
A President attacking his own States? The abuse that Arizona has suffered under this Marxist Regime is ridiculous. Planned Parenthood, Muslim Brotherhood, Illegal ALIENS, The SEIU, New Black Panthers and ACORN receive support from the Regime. How long can this continue?
Portion below by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner.
Obama Administration colluded with ACLU to attack Arizona
A leading Washington, DC public-interest group, that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported on Thursday afternoon that it has received documents from Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice that reveal the DOJ worked hand-in-hand with the American Civil Liberties Union in mounting their respective legal challenges to SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough illegal immigration law, according to Judicial Watch public affairs director Jill Farrell.
In her report -- submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police Legislative Committee -- Farrell states that pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed as far back as June 17, 2010, the documents released to Judicial Watch include email exchanges between Justice Department officials and the ACLU's staff.
Included among the documents obtained by Farrell's Judicial Watch colleagues is a July 27, 2010, email exchange between Lucas Guttentag, leader of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and the DOJ’s Edwin Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General:
2:15 pm: Ed
I left a voicemail earlier today about checking in once the district court rules. Would you be available then?
[Redacted statement] And from all of us, thank you again for your argument on behalf of the United States.
Lucas
2:40 pm: Thanks Lucas. We should definitely check in once we hear. We’ll be huddling here as soon as we can. What is your thinking at this point on if/how you will proceed in various possible scenarios?
It was good to see you, even if only briefly, and to be on the same side for once! [Redacted statement] I have a feeling we might be seeing each other again on this case.
Ed
6:14 pm: Thanks Ed. Yes, a real pleasure to be on the same side.
I think we will be strongly inclined to seek an immediate emergency injunction from the 9th Circuit…
Can you share your current thinking with regard to the various scenarios?
Best Lucas
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include email exchanges between ACLU staff and Joshua Wilkenfeld, the Assistant U.S. Attorney who signed the government’s pleadings in the lawsuit, exchanged hearing transcripts and established opportunities to discuss the case. For example, the documents included this July 16, 2010, email from Guttentag to Wilkenfeld:
Josh
…Yes, look forward to talking. I’m getting a fuller briefing on yesterday’s hearing later this morning (Calif. time) and then I am tied up for a short while. Would it work for you to talk at about 4.00 or 4.30p Eastern? If it’s okay with you, I’d like to include two colleagues. By the way, we tried to order a transcript yesterday but understand the US Attorney’s office already did. Can we get a copy directly from you when it’s available?
All best,
Lucas
Assistant U.S. Attorney Wilkenfeld sent the transcript to the ACLU later that day.
"In the aftermath of President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, the White House, the Democrat Party, and the majority of the members of the news media tried to convince Americans that Obama is a moderate or a centrist. Well, if he is a moderate, why is his administration working with an organization that's decidedly far-left?" asks political strategist Mike Baker.
On May 17, 2010, a coalition of “civil rights groups,” including the ACLU, filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona over SB 1070. According to the ACLU’s press release announcing the lawsuit, this coalition included: “…the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.”
On July 6, 2010, the Obama DOJ filed a lawsuit of its own, which has been described by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) as a “cut and paste” version of the ACLU lawsuit, Farrell revealed.
“It is one thing to share the ACLU’s disrespect for the rule of law but it is quite another to collude with the organization on a prosecutorial strategy against the State of Arizona. Frankly, these new documents show it is hard to tell where the ACLU ends and the Justice Department begins,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The Obama Justice Department is supposed to be an independent, nonpartisan law enforcement agency. Many Americans will be disturbed, though maybe not surprised, to find that Eric Holder’s Justice Department is colluding with one of the most leftist organizations in the nation. We know whose ‘side’ this Justice Department is on when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Fitton stated.
According to Ms. Farrell, Judicial Watch is representing Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070, pro bono in the Obama administration’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona law.
Last October, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to Arizona's SB 1070, which Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
Like the ACLU, the majority of judges sitting on the bench of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are far-left ideologues who hold the record for most overturned decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Written by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Portion below by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner.
Obama Administration colluded with ACLU to attack Arizona
A leading Washington, DC public-interest group, that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported on Thursday afternoon that it has received documents from Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice that reveal the DOJ worked hand-in-hand with the American Civil Liberties Union in mounting their respective legal challenges to SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough illegal immigration law, according to Judicial Watch public affairs director Jill Farrell.
In her report -- submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police Legislative Committee -- Farrell states that pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed as far back as June 17, 2010, the documents released to Judicial Watch include email exchanges between Justice Department officials and the ACLU's staff.
Included among the documents obtained by Farrell's Judicial Watch colleagues is a July 27, 2010, email exchange between Lucas Guttentag, leader of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and the DOJ’s Edwin Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General:
2:15 pm: Ed
I left a voicemail earlier today about checking in once the district court rules. Would you be available then?
[Redacted statement] And from all of us, thank you again for your argument on behalf of the United States.
Lucas
2:40 pm: Thanks Lucas. We should definitely check in once we hear. We’ll be huddling here as soon as we can. What is your thinking at this point on if/how you will proceed in various possible scenarios?
It was good to see you, even if only briefly, and to be on the same side for once! [Redacted statement] I have a feeling we might be seeing each other again on this case.
Ed
6:14 pm: Thanks Ed. Yes, a real pleasure to be on the same side.
I think we will be strongly inclined to seek an immediate emergency injunction from the 9th Circuit…
Can you share your current thinking with regard to the various scenarios?
Best Lucas
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include email exchanges between ACLU staff and Joshua Wilkenfeld, the Assistant U.S. Attorney who signed the government’s pleadings in the lawsuit, exchanged hearing transcripts and established opportunities to discuss the case. For example, the documents included this July 16, 2010, email from Guttentag to Wilkenfeld:
Josh
…Yes, look forward to talking. I’m getting a fuller briefing on yesterday’s hearing later this morning (Calif. time) and then I am tied up for a short while. Would it work for you to talk at about 4.00 or 4.30p Eastern? If it’s okay with you, I’d like to include two colleagues. By the way, we tried to order a transcript yesterday but understand the US Attorney’s office already did. Can we get a copy directly from you when it’s available?
All best,
Lucas
Assistant U.S. Attorney Wilkenfeld sent the transcript to the ACLU later that day.
"In the aftermath of President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, the White House, the Democrat Party, and the majority of the members of the news media tried to convince Americans that Obama is a moderate or a centrist. Well, if he is a moderate, why is his administration working with an organization that's decidedly far-left?" asks political strategist Mike Baker.
On May 17, 2010, a coalition of “civil rights groups,” including the ACLU, filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona over SB 1070. According to the ACLU’s press release announcing the lawsuit, this coalition included: “…the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.”
On July 6, 2010, the Obama DOJ filed a lawsuit of its own, which has been described by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) as a “cut and paste” version of the ACLU lawsuit, Farrell revealed.
“It is one thing to share the ACLU’s disrespect for the rule of law but it is quite another to collude with the organization on a prosecutorial strategy against the State of Arizona. Frankly, these new documents show it is hard to tell where the ACLU ends and the Justice Department begins,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“The Obama Justice Department is supposed to be an independent, nonpartisan law enforcement agency. Many Americans will be disturbed, though maybe not surprised, to find that Eric Holder’s Justice Department is colluding with one of the most leftist organizations in the nation. We know whose ‘side’ this Justice Department is on when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Fitton stated.
According to Ms. Farrell, Judicial Watch is representing Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070, pro bono in the Obama administration’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona law.
Last October, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to Arizona's SB 1070, which Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.
Like the ACLU, the majority of judges sitting on the bench of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are far-left ideologues who hold the record for most overturned decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Written by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, February 7, 2011
How can Clinton continue to support Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood?
Oh well, Hillary slaps down Women again. She allowed her Slick Willie blowhard hubby to run wild on young women. How many other women were attacked by Boxcar Willie? The Left gives a pass and Hillary does her best Barry Soetoro impersonation and sits quietly as Radical Muslim Brotherhood Thugs attack. We have a great article below written by M Catharine Evans.
Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below written by M Catharine Evans
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.
From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:
How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.
It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N. The subjugation of women is fine as long as it serves the administration's political ends. Remember President Obama's 2009 Cairo speech where he promised the U.S. would defend Islamic religious teachings:
The US. Government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal."
In the same month the President spoke those words, the State Department set up an office for outreach to the Muslim Communities. Farah Pandith reported directly to Clinton who would "seek a new beginning with Muslims around the world." Did that include the Muslim Brotherhood determined to impose Sharia law around the world? Honor killings and harsh punishments for women emanate from the same law as the hijab. This from Pamela Geller:
Aset Magomadova leaves Calgary court Thursday July 15, 2010, after a judge sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova's killing of daughter Aminat.
Sharia law in Canada. That's all that this is. Period. Islam is crazy? Crazy like a fox?
Clinton is nothing more than an Obama knock-off in her alliance with Islamic groups. Instead of specifically denouncing the Muslim Brotherhood and any other sect that adheres to laws promoting the maiming and killing of girls, the former Senator is silent. Rather, she should refer her disillusioned supporter, Reverend Amy, to one of the many ‘it takes a village' speeches she has been asked to give over the years. In light of her recent stance on the Egyptian crisis, oppressed women under Islamist regimes definitely do not have an ally in Hillary Clinton.
Read more M.Catharine Evans at www.potterwilliamsreport.com
Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below written by M Catharine Evans
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.
From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:
How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.
It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N. The subjugation of women is fine as long as it serves the administration's political ends. Remember President Obama's 2009 Cairo speech where he promised the U.S. would defend Islamic religious teachings:
The US. Government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal."
In the same month the President spoke those words, the State Department set up an office for outreach to the Muslim Communities. Farah Pandith reported directly to Clinton who would "seek a new beginning with Muslims around the world." Did that include the Muslim Brotherhood determined to impose Sharia law around the world? Honor killings and harsh punishments for women emanate from the same law as the hijab. This from Pamela Geller:
Aset Magomadova leaves Calgary court Thursday July 15, 2010, after a judge sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova's killing of daughter Aminat.
Sharia law in Canada. That's all that this is. Period. Islam is crazy? Crazy like a fox?
Clinton is nothing more than an Obama knock-off in her alliance with Islamic groups. Instead of specifically denouncing the Muslim Brotherhood and any other sect that adheres to laws promoting the maiming and killing of girls, the former Senator is silent. Rather, she should refer her disillusioned supporter, Reverend Amy, to one of the many ‘it takes a village' speeches she has been asked to give over the years. In light of her recent stance on the Egyptian crisis, oppressed women under Islamist regimes definitely do not have an ally in Hillary Clinton.
Read more M.Catharine Evans at www.potterwilliamsreport.com
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrants,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
mosque,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law
Monday, January 24, 2011
Allen West Condemns Obama Regime For Allowing PLO Flag To Fly in DC
The Obama Marxist Regime (Soetoro Regime) continues to kiss up to Radical Islam and Terrorists. Why does he hate America? Because Obama follows his Father and Rev, Wright and Bill Ayers. They despise America and would love to see Israel fall. Liberals are blinded by Political Correctness and follow Soetoro no matter what. Self-loathing Liberals will not speak out against Soetoro as he destroys our Country. Loo at the Racist Obama installs to help whittle America down to nothing, Sotomayor and Holder among them. Holder would rather fight FOR Radical Islam and Muslims the do his job of arresting them. Yes, Liberals are that despicable and support the Soetoro Regime.
Many of the Liberals either believe America should fall or they are to scared be called a Racist if they criticize B. Hussein. Remember the MSM and vocal Hollywood Celebrity druggies say that all those who speak out against the Messiah, is a Racist.
Instead, these coward Liberals watch as their Children and grandchildren will live in a third world country or be slaughtered by Radical Islam.
It is time to back People like Allen West and Marco Rubio and Michelle Bachmann. Allen West, R-Plantation, is publicly condemning the Palestine Liberation Organization, or PLO, for raising its flag outside its offices in the nation’s capital.
“By allowing this flag to be flown, the United States is extending a diplomatic right that we refrain from offering to even our own allies, like Taiwan. This action is a diplomatic slap in the face of our greatest of allies, Israel.” Allen West
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans,
Video
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)