Black on White Violence and the Racial Double Standard of the Left

This is what you don't hear from the Cowards in the MSM (Media Supporting Marxists):
"You Get What You Deserve, White Boy".

A 13-Year-Old was Set on Fire by 2 digusting Lowlifes. This was a horrific Racially Charged Attack that the MSM kept quiet on. The few words they mentioned were surgically scrubbed of the real facts, meaning it was a Hate Crime. Wake up the self-loathing Liberals in the MSM and fight back!

There is plenty more that is scrubbed as we have the most Racially divisive President in the past 100 years.

Actual dragging deaths CENSORED by the cowards known as th mainstream media.
Six year old Jake Robel was ripped from his mother’s arms and dragged to death on a busy highway. The perp, Kim Davis, was a lifelong criminal who had been released from jail despite having an outstanding warrant.

Davis carjacked Robel’s mother. However, when his mother tried to get him out of the car, Davis sped off. Robel was dragged to death on the interstate in Kansas City, Mo in front of hundreds of horrified witnesses. Davis was stopped, when other cars surrounded and blocked him. By this time, Robel’s body had been ripped to shreds.

This horrifying public murder took place in 2000. It was HEAVILY CENSORED by the so-called “mainstream press.”

Two years earlier in Waco, Texas three ex-cons (two white, one Latino) dragged to death a black ex-con over a feud that started in prison. The white ringleader, King, wanted revenge for being gang raped by blacks in prison. To this day, twelve years later, the media still talks about this crime constantly.

Ask yourself, why have you never heard of Jake Robel? Imagine for a second that Jake Robel was black and his killer was white. This would have been the largest news story for Jesse jackson and Al Sharpton. No, instead the MSM quarantined, and censored this story about this innocent Boy. Even when the Missouri legislature passed a law named after Jake Robel, the media continued to hide the story. In instances when it was reported, all references to race were censored and no pictures were shown.

Wasn't the vile Jesse jackson the person who said there are no Hate Crimes against White People? The biggest Hate Crime perpetrated against America is B. Hussein Obama. He and his Mrs. have despised America for years and know have the power with Eric Holder to trample America. Barry Soetoro is openly promoting Racism rather than working to unify a divided country.

Here is more on the double standard with hate Crimes. Below is some of the excellent article from Selwyn Duke.

Was Boy in K.C. Fire Attack a Victim of His School's Racist Teaching?
By Selwyn Duke
The boy raised his hand, eager to answer the question. "What would you know about it?" exclaimed the teacher dismissively. "You're not our race."

This was not dialogue from a Hollywood movie. According to a woman named Melissa Coon, it was what a teacher at East High School in Kansas City told her 13-year-old son, Allen, when he attempted to answer a question during Black History Month. Coon identifies that teacher as Mrs. Karla Dorsey, who is black; Allen is white.

As has already been reported, Allen was a victim of a vicious racial attack last week in which two older black teens doused him with gasoline and set him alight, saying, "This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy." Not surprisingly, Coon has pulled her son out of East High and, concerned about further racial violence, intends to leave the K.C. area.


While this crime is making headlines, Coon states that it was merely the horrible culmination of continual racial harassment her son had to endure at East High. Moreover, after conducting an investigation that included extensive interviews with parents and students, I've learned that Coon's son is not alone. Other white students also report a pattern of racial harassment at the high school at the hands of their peers -- and, shockingly, their teachers.

Another white victim is 15-year-old Ashley Miller, whose family had moved to K.C., MO, from Kansas. Subject to racial harassment, she was called names such as "white b****." She also actually shared a class with Allen Coon, and as the only two white students in the room, they became the target of sexual comments. Moreover, she reports the same experience with race-baiting videos as do the Wildeisens: they would be shown, and an onus would be placed on the white students. Her mother Melissa told me that she now fears for her daughter's safety and, you guessed it, is in the process of withdrawing Ashley from East High. And the rest of the pattern is holding, too: the Millers are contemplating leaving the area.

The Mother of the Boy who was burned says that "he was called every racial slur you can imagine," such as "honkey," "cracker," "whitey," and "guero" (a Spanish slang term for whites that can be used in a derogatory way). He was, she reports, pushed into lockers and was jumped in the bathroom. And even before the recent attack, he was sometimes menaced by groups that would follow him part of the way home.

Even more damning, though, is that multiple educators were complicit in the harassment. Mrs. Coon related an incident in which a teacher she identifies as Ms. Carla Kinder called Allen "Casper" and then "got all the students to get involved." Other times, the students would initiate the harassment, and the teachers would pick up the baton. "They would tease him; people would make fun of him, and they'd chime in," said Coon.

Then, as the Wildeisen girls report, as Ashley Miller reports, there were the race-baiting films. Said Mrs. Coon, "They showed a lot of racial movies. And people would make comments -- lots of comments -- especially at him [Allen], during these things."

And Coon's experience with the local police hasn't been much better. Listening to her testimony I got the feeling that K.C. law enforcement didn't want the arrest and prosecution of two black youths on a hate-crime charge, possibly for fear of the "powder keg." Perhaps this is a job for the DOJ's Civil Rights Division. Oh, yeah, Eric Holder.

Obama with Racists Al Sharpton and Derrick Bell

UNCOVERED: The Close Friend of Soetoro and NBC News Star Al Sharpton's Racist and Homophobic Rants.


Now to another example of why this is a Racist Regime. Barry Soeotoro is very close to Racist Derrick Bell. This Soeotoro Friend is so racist that Thomas Sowell Compares Obama-Endorsed Racist Derrick Bell To Hitler.

Obama Starts Racist Campaign Organization

Dear Friends:

Our great unifying President has organized a group called, "African-Americans for Obama". Can you believe the chutzpah of this fraud in the White House? Click on to the attached video and see for yourself the arrogance of this man. Can you imagine Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich organizing a group and calling it the, "White-Americans for.......". There would be riots in the streets and the word "racist" would shouted from the rooftops. How can he get away with this blatant racist act and not be called on it? Is the media in the tank for him again this time around? Is the Pope Catholic?

From,

Chuck On The Right Side


Portion below from STOP MARXISM

This Soetoro is the biggest Racist President in the past 100 years. This Radical Obama always plays with the Marxist Rulebook, class warfare and race baiting. The Idiots, yes I said IDIOTS who voted for him were to blind or too stupid to research the Marxist. Soetoro told us all how he would govern and he has done it.

At this point in time anyone, Black, White or whatever who supports Obama is a Racist. It is that simple. All the Rev Wright and Al Sharpton drones are supporting Racism. Hussein Obama is using the Black People like he uses everyone else who buys into his Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology.

Please show this to all Americans, maybe we can get this racist tactic exposed for the country to see.

Obama’s Historic Firsts

OBAMA says he’s the the representative for change… He’s historic, alright – Check out the changes below:

First President to refuse to show a valid Birth Certificate.

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner

First President to have a social security number from a state he’s never even lived in

First President to Preside over a Cut to the Credit Rating of the United States Government

First President to Violate the War Powers Act

First President to Orchestrate the Sale of Murder Weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels

First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for Illegally Obstructing Oil Drilling in the Gulf of Mexico

First President to Defy a Federal Judge’s Court Order to Cease Implementing the ‘Health Care Reform’ Law

First President to Require All Americans to Purchase a Product From a Third Party

First President to Spend a Trillion Dollars on ‘Shovel-Ready’ Jobs– and Later Admit There Was No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Jobs

First President to Abrogate Bankruptcy Law to Turn Over Control of Companies to His Union Supporters

First President to Bypass Congress and Implement the DREAM Act Through Executive Fiat

First President to “Order a Secret Amnesty Program that Stopped the Deportations of Illegal Immigrants Across the US , Including Those With Criminal Convictions”

First President to Demand a Company Hand Over $20 Billion to One of His Political Appointees

First President to Terminate America’s Ability to Put a Man into Space

First President to Encourage Racial Discrimination and Intimidation at Polling Places

First President to Have a Law Signed By an ‘Auto-pen’ Without Being “Present”

First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It

First President to Threaten Insurance Companies if they Publicly Speak out on the Reasons for their Rate Increases

First President to Tell a Major Manufacturing Company In Which State They Are Allowed to Locate a Factory

First President to File Lawsuits Against the States He Swore an Oath to Protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN, etc)

First President to Withdraw an Existing Coal Permit That Had Been Properly Issued Years Ago (He said he will bankrupt the Coal Industry. This will help send many families to become poor and dependent on Government)

First President to Fire an Inspector General of Ameri-corps for Catching One of His Friends in a Corruption Case

First President to Propose an Executive Order Demanding Companies Disclose Their Political Contributions to Bid on Government Contracts

First President to appoint 45 ‘czars’ to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to Golf 73 separate Times in His First Two-and-a-Half Years in Office

First President to hide his medical, educational, and travel records

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it

First President to coddle America’s enemies while alienating America’s allies

First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the US flag

First President to go on multiple Global apology tours But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs, affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is repaired, etc, etc

First President to go on 17 ‘vacations’, including ‘date nights’ paid for by the taxpayer.

Liberals are by nature liars. Their beliefs are to drive Americans into the hands of the Big Government. Hypocrisy is the middle name of Liberals. Look at how the rich Liberals live and they want to keep the slaves on the plantation.

Still Impossible To Debate About Islam

Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media!


Geert Wilders: "In far too many Western countries, it is still impossible to have a debate about the nature of Islam"

Geert Wilders on his acquittal:

Wilders: In Defense of 'Hurtful' Speech

Wall Street Journal 24 June 2011 (hat tip Ruthfully yours)

In Defense of 'Hurtful' Speech
I was tried for a thought crime despite being an elected politician and the leader of the third-largest party in the Dutch parliament. Yesterday was a beautiful day for freedom of speech in the Netherlands. An Amsterdam court acquitted me of all charges of hate speech after a legal ordeal that lasted almost two years.

The Dutch people learned that political debate has not been stifled in their country. They learned they are still allowed to speak critically about Islam, and that resistance against Islamization is not a crime. I was brought to trial despite being an elected politician and the leader of the third-largest party in the Dutch parliament. I was not prosecuted for anything I did, but for what I said.

My view on Islam is that it is not so much a religion as a totalitarian political ideology with religious elements. While there are many moderate Muslims, Islam's political ideology is radical and has global ambitions. I expressed these views in newspaper interviews, op-ed articles, and in my 2008 documentary, "Fitna."

I was dragged to court by leftist and Islamic organizations that were bent not only on silencing me but on stifling public debate. My accusers claimed that I deliberately "insulted" and "incited discrimination and hatred" against Muslims. The Dutch penal code states in its articles 137c and 137d that anyone who either "publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in any way that incites hatred against a group of people" or "in any way that insults a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their hetero- or homosexual inclination or their physical, psychological or mental handicap, will be punished."

I was dragged to court for statements that I made as a politician and which were meant to stimulate public debate in a country where public debate has stagnated for decades. Dutch political parties see themselves as guardians of a sterile status quo. I want our problems to be discussed. I believe that politicians have a public trust to further debates about important issues. I firmly believe that every public debate holds the prospect of enlightenment.

My views represent those of a growing number of Dutch voters, who have flocked to the Party for Freedom, or PVV. The PVV is the fastest-growing party in the country, expanding from one seat in the 150-seat House of Representatives in 2004, to nine seats in 2006 and 24 seats in 2010. My party's views, however, are so uncommon in the Netherlands that they are considered blasphemous by powerful elites who fear and resent discussion.

That's why I was taken to court, even though the public prosecutor saw no reason to prosecute me. "Freedom of expression fulfills an essential role in public debate in a democratic society," the prosecutors repeatedly said during my trial. "That comments are hurtful and offensive for a large number of Muslims does not mean that they are punishable."

The Netherlands is one of the few countries in the world where a court can force the public prosecutor to prosecute someone. In January 2009, three judges of the Amsterdam Appeals Court ordered my prosecution in a politically motivated verdict that focused on the content of the case. They implied that I was guilty. The case was subsequently referred to the Amsterdam Court of First Instance.

The judges who acquitted me yesterday already had a peremptory ruling from the appeals court on their desk. They decided, however, to follow the arguments of the public prosecutor, who during the trial had once again reiterated his position and had asked for a full acquittal.

Though I am obviously relieved by yesterday's decision, my thoughts go to people such as Danish journalist Lars Hedegaard, Austrian human rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and others who have recently been convicted for criticizing Islam. They have not been as fortunate. In far too many Western countries, it is still impossible to have a debate about the nature of Islam.

The biggest threat to our democracies is not political debate, nor is it public dissent. As the American judge Learned Hand once said in a speech: "That community is already in the process of dissolution . . . where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists to win or lose." It has been a tenet in European and American thinking that men are only free when they respect each other's freedom. If the courts can no longer guarantee this, then surely a community is in the process of dissolution.
Legislation such as articles 137c and 137d of the Dutch Penal Code disgraces our democratic free societies. On the basis of such legislation, I was prevented from representing my million-and-a-half voters in parliament because I had to be in the courtroom for several days, sometimes up to three days per week, during the past year and a half. Such legislation should be abolished. It should be abolished in all Western countries where it exists-and replaced by First Amendment clauses.

Citizens should never allow themselves to be silenced. I have spoken, I speak and I shall continue to speak.

Mr. Wilders is a member of the Dutch Parliament and the leader of the Party for Freedom

Hat Tip to Mr. I

Muslims Learn They Don't Need Bombs to Destroy USA

Western civilization is in a fight for survival and our TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States) sits on Broadway to watch Sister Act. Did "Sister Act" make a profit on Broadway? Well if yes, then turn that profit over Marxist whoopie Goldberg! All you Marxists who support Soetoro, well live by your words, now is not the time to make a Profit!

The portion below is by the great Debbie Schlussel


Accident” or Jihad?: Egyptian Pilot’s Near Miss @ JFK Airport

Written by Debbie Schlussel
Hmmm . . . an EgyptAir pilot takes a wrong turn “by accident” and nearly causes a collision with a Lufthansa plane speeding down the runway and about to take off from New York’s JFK airport. “Accident” or deliberate jihad? It wouldn’t exactly be the first time an Egyptian pilot deliberately engaged in jihad and purposefully murdered passengers. And pilots just don’t make boneheaded moves like the one this Muslim pilot made on Monday. Listen to the audio of the pilots, below. Do you really think this Egyptian pilot is such a moron . . . or cold and calculating? I vote the latter.

EgyptAir or JihadAir?: Making the Skies–AND the Runways–Not So Friendly
In November 1999, co-pilot Gamil Al-Batouti deliberately crashed his EgyptAir plane into the ocean, off the coast of Massachusetts, killing more than 200 passengers, after being recorded saying Muslim prayers to Allah. He waited until the captain of the flight left the cabin and disconnected auto-pilot. Although “experts” said it was a suicide, he could have easily committed suicide on his own, rather than take a plane down carrying a number of Americans. It was clearly an act of Islamic terrorism. And there have been a number of other mysterious and suspicious EgyptAir crashes in recent years.

But, no worries, the EgyptAir pilot from the Monday incident took off 90 minutes later, and the pilot is safely away from American reach. Thanks, federal agents, for letting this pilot leave the U.S. without any investigation whatsoever. Only in America. I guarantee you that if an American pilot did this in Egypt, he’d long since have been tortured to death.

A packed Lufthansa jet narrowly avoided a deadly collision with an EgyptAir flight that had taxied into its path at Kennedy Airport, terrifying air traffic control tapes revealed.

“Cancel takeoff! Cancel takeoff plans!” shouted a rattled air traffic controller as the massive Lufthansa Airbus A340 steamrolled toward the EgyptAir Boeing 777 just before 7 p.m. Monday.

“Lufthansa 411 heavy is rejecting takeoff,” the pilot acknowledged as the plane screeched to a halt just moments before the potential disaster.
“All traffic is stopped right now,” the controller informed all planes, according to recordings posted on LiveATC.net.

The narrowly averted disaster came as the Cairo-bound Egyptian airliner had apparently mistakenly turned the wrong way onto Runway 22R.
The error occurred just as the Munich-bound Lufthansa flight was approaching full lift-off speed of 180 mph less than a mile away.

Stunned pilots who witnessed the near tragedy as they circled the airport let out sighs of relief that no one was killed.
“Those two were coming together,” radioed one unidentified pilot.
“That was quite a show. I thought it was going to be a short career,” a Virgin America pilot arriving from Los Angeles radioed in moments later.

If the two planes had collided, it could easily have turned into a catastrophic calamity – the Lufthansa plane was carrying 286 passengers and the EgyptAir flight can carry up to 346.

After screeching to a halt, the Lufthansa flight crew requested maintenance crews come and check their overheated brakes.
“Maybe we have hot brakes right now. Maybe we take a minute,” a flight crew member radioed to the tower.

The flight took off safely about 40 minutes later. The EgyptAir took off 90 minutes later.

It seems very suspicious and hardly an “accident.” And letting this pilot leave the U.S. just an hour and a half later? Truly boneheaded.

Do you think that if an Israeli or British or French pilot nearly murdered hundreds of Americans at an Airport just miles from Ground Zero, the pilot would be gone from America 90 minutes later without any attempt to detain him?

Dream on. But, hey, we gotta be extra-super-nice to the Muslim pilot, ‘cuz–ya know–maybe it will make ‘em like us better.

Hat Tip to Mr. I

Liberal Columbia Professor Pleads Guilty to Incest

Below is an example of what many of the Liberal Universities have installed to brainwash young Adults. Slimeballs like Terrorist Bill Ayers, racist Professor Gates, Marxists Cloward and Piven and now this David Epstein dirtbag. If professor Epstein’s crime is not justified for removal from his position at Columbia University what is? Liberals, Progressives, and Nazi Democrats are destroying America.


Education Liberal Columbia Professor Keeps Job Despite Pleading Guilty to Incest Charge

Last December Columbia University Professor David Epstein was in the headlines. Not for his blog posts at the Huffington Post on issues ranging from torture to Sarah Palin, but rather for his arrest and charge of having participated in a three year sexual relationship with his 24-year-old daughter. The Columbia Spectator’s Jackie Carrero and Mikey Zhong have reported that despite pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge for attempted incest on May 10, Mr. Epstein will remain a Professor at the $40,000+ yearly tuition Ivy League university.

Mr. Epstein taught at Columbia University along with his wife, a political science professor, and the two were featured in a 2008 Spectator article on professors who “bring love to work.” Manhattan District Attorney’s office criminal complaint in December read that “professor David Epstein’s incest was committed between July 2006 and June 2009 at University Apartment Housing building on 120th Street,” and the New York Daily News reported that the relationship featured “twisted text messages.”

Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far

Political Correctness has helped to crumble our society. Some pervert like Wanda Sykes can tell how she wants Rush Limbaugh to die. The Racist Liberals and the so-called President, Obama laughed it up. Yet when a 16 year old white guy says that an odd looking statute “looks Gay”, well Wanda Sykes is there to scold the kid and make fun of his mustache? Double Standard? Liberals have no civility. Liberals have a proclivity for Violence.

Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But Effective! Of course the Media Ignores the truth as the MSM is promoting this slave-owner Regime.

Political Correctness is a movement of speech purification which is meant to remove any objectionable content that unfairly differentiates between the speaker and different subgroups. It is also supposed to change behavior by promoting these subgroups. So the Marxist Liberals us it to attack anyone who speaks out against a Gay Person or so-called Minority. Of course the Marxist Liberals use it to "legally" attack Conservatives.

Marxist MSM Attacks Rick Scott, Florida Governor

Dear Stephen L. Goldstein:

Just read another sour grapes column by the political vintner of undrinkable wine, Stephen L. Goldstein. Who'd have thought that Goldstein would write a column against a Republican governor, Rick Scott. I'm "shocked" as Peter Lorre would say in that famous scene from the film Casablanca.

Suppose the Democrats were in charge in Tallahassee - would you be writing a similar column - I think not as your partisanship would take over and condone a Democratic redistricting. right Stephen? Redistricting is either good or bad depending if you are in the majority in the legislative and executive branches of government. It's O.K. if Democrats are "guaranteed" election in "gerrymandered" districts (Ex. Alcee Hastings in the 23rd C.D,), but is "evil" if it favors Republicans, right again Stephen?

Here it is only one month into the Scott administration, and already Stephen L. Goldstein has gotten his DEPENDS all wet and soiled. The governor is already classified, by you, as being autocratic, condescending, and unaccountable. Gee, will the words crook, filthy rich and illegitimate be far behind? You threw out the figure that Scott had only 49% of the vote and that somehow translates into his being illegitimate, but Bill Clinton getting 43% of the vote (year 2000) was a voters mandate and absolutely "legitimate". 49% was pretty damn goods in a 3-way race,don't you think Stephen?

I'm sure Stephen, no matter what Rick Scott does, he'll be fodder for your cheap-shot, slime machine all during his term as governor. You are not overly partisan Stephen, but you are exceedingly irrelevant as well.

Sincerely,

Chuck On The Right Side

Left-wing Black Activists Commit Race Attacks

We have a article below from the great WorldNetDaily. I realize this is a longtime ploy of Marxists to simply throw down the Race Card. How many Liberals have encountered a disagreement or fight with a Minority, yet they are not RACISTS? Wrong, the liberals are the Racists and/or they want to help destroy America.

Breitbart to NAACP president: 'Go to hell'

Journalist insists black leaders – not tea partiers – are real 'racists'
By Drew Zahn

© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Andrew Breitbart

Internet journalist Andrew Breitbart unleashed a tirade on talk radio yesterday, blasting the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People for its condemnation of tea partiers as "racist," instead charging the NAACP itself with racism and telling its president where he can "go."


"Let me say something a tad newsworthy to the president of the NAACP: You can go to hell," Breitbart said. "I have tapes, a tape, of racism, and it's an NAACP dinner. You want to play with fire? I have evidence of racism, and it's coming from the
NAACP."

Breitbart made the explosive comments on the air with Scott Hennen, who hosts a morning talk show on WZFG 1100 AM in Fargo, N.D.

His comments came in response to a resolution adopted by the 101st annual convention of the NAACP earlier this week, condemning the "racism" of the tea-party movement and claiming it could return the nation to the pre-civil-rights era.

According to a report from KMBC television in Kansas City, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous told his organization's members tea parties must "expel the bigots and racists in your ranks or take the responsibility for them and their actions."

"We will no longer allow you to hide like cowards and hide behind signs that say 'lynch our president' or anyone else," Jealous said.

Specific charges within the NAACP resolution, reports the Kansas City Star, include allegations that tea-party supporters have engaged in "explicitly racist behavior," have "displayed signs and posters intended to degrade people of color generally and President Barack Obama specifically" and have used racial epithets in verbally abusing members of Congress.

Breitbart, however, contends that the tea-party movement is about the president's policies, not his race, and that many of the charges of racist behavior at tea-party rallies are exaggerated. Breitbart has also offered a $100,000 reward for any tangible proof of the epithets that were reportedly launched at black U.S. representatives during a tea-party rally protesting Congress' health-care reform efforts – a bounty no one has yet been able to claim.

"You are manufacturing this in a summer in which the economy is the No. 1 issue affecting blacks and whites in this country," Breitbart said of the NAACP. "This country can ill-afford the schism of race to be exploited the way you are, based upon the false premise of the tea party being racist. … This is absolutely manufactured for political gain."

When Hennen brought up a Washington Times story linking the NAACP to the New Black Panther Party, whose Minister King Samir Shabazz not only escaped federal prosecution for voter intimidation amid much controversy but also called for the killing of "some crackers" and "some of their babies" to gain black freedom from white oppression, Breitbart continued his criticism of the NAACP convention.

"Where is the resolution to condemn the racism coming from the [Black Panthers] and killing cracker babies?" Breitbart asked. "Why is the mainstream media ignoring that story while playing up the nonexistent story of the n-word being hurled at congressmen?"

Breitbart joins many voices objecting to the NAACP's denouncement of racism within the tea-party movement.

"For the NAACP to accuse the tea parties of racism is insulting to the great patriots who have participated in this movement and sadly shows just how out of touch that group is with the American people," Tea Party Express spokesman Levi Russell told Politico. "Some of the most compelling leaders of this movement are of many different races – men and women such as William and Selena Owens, Lloyd Marcus, Kevin Jackson and others.

"The racism accusation by the likes of the NAACP has been proved false time and again. Earlier this year, Democrats smeared tea-party activists by claiming members of the Black Caucus were spit on and called the n-word as they paraded through a crowd of tea partiers," he told the publication. "Their blatant lie was proved false by overwhelming evidence from multiple video cameras that recorded the event."

In a blog posted the day before interviewing Breitbart, Hennen expressed similar sentiments.

"In spite of a coordinated bias by the mainstream media, patriotic Americans continue to assemble throughout the nation in protest of big-government policies threatening to undermine our basic liberties," Hennen writes.

"Maybe you're one of the thousands of participants who showed up at one of the tea parties this summer. Take a look in the mirror; what do you see? A racist? Or do you see an average, hard-working American, concerned about the future of this republic?" he asked. "I've met enough of you at these events to virtually guarantee that it's the latter."

Dhimmitude & The Regime

Did you know this was in the health care bill? I didn't. This word is not in my RANDOM HOUSE COLLEGE DICTIONARY. So therefore Google for information. "Dhimmitude"

Word of the Day: Dhimmitude

Has anyone heard of this word? Dhimmitude?
Unbelievable!
I had my doubts so I checked with Snopes. There is an exemption for "certain religious groups" in the Health Care Bill. Obama supporters especially, check it out for yourselves.
Never heard the word before?---Try typing it into Google and start reading. Pretty interesting!!

It seems that Muslims and certain other religions are exempt from the ObamaCare penalties, and their exemptions are supported by law. We are surrendering from within! The prez is leading us right down the path to total Muslim control and most of us don't give a rat's patootie! Maybe we voted for him in good faith, but now yet another "truth" comes out. Perhaps we should rethink what we have done.

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for _tolerating their presence_ AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam. (see >> http://www.dhimmitude.org/)

The ObamaCare bill is the first step in the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims may be not only specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase health insurance, but exempted also from the penalty tax for being uninsured.

Seems that Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking" and "usury" and thus is to be banned. Muslims may be specifically granted an exemption based on this.

How convenient. So John and Jane Smith, as Christians, Jews, Buddhists or whatever, may have crippling IRS liens placed against all of our assets, including real estate, cattle, cars, etc., and even accounts receivables, and could also face hard prison time if we refuse to buy health insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance at our expense. Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. Period. This is Dhimmitude.

Dhimmitude serves two purposes: it enriches the Muslim masters AND over the long haul serves to drive conversions to Islam. In this case, the incentive to convert to Islam will be taken up by those minorities in the inner-cities as well as the godless Generation X, Y and Z types who have no moral anchor or belief in God! If you don't believe in Christ to begin with, it is no problem whatsoever to again sell Him for 30 pieces of silver. "Sure, I'll be a Muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, brother?"

I recommend sending this email to all of your contacts who may actually give a damn about where there this country is heading. This is desperately important and people need to know about it and what the past election has done to all of us!
P.S. Have you heard about the summit Obama is holding this month in DC for the future Muslim business leaders in the US? He wants to increase the ability to begin business opportunities in the US for the Muslim community! Better start looking for a country that doesn't cater to the Muslims such as Australia, because this country will be overrun by Muslims like Europe is currently experiencing. And you thought our problem was the Mexicans!.....That's what they want you to think!!!

Hat Tip to B!

Ohio Car Insurance

Marxist Regime and the Most Anti-Israel President!

Obama has made no secret of the fact that he HATES Jews. Why is that so many Jewish People still support him and his Marxist Regime?
He belongs to the New World Order, he keeps company with Black Panther members, Louis Farrakhan Clan, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and many others. He's stated numerous times that he thinks that the US should withdraw all armed forces from Israel. I just don't see why any Jews would support someone who clearly is against the Jewish cause. So, how in the world do you end up with celebs like Barbara Streisand, who, year after year, support a political candidate who literally wants to wipe the floors with the Jews? We must feel for the great Jewish Patriots such as Mark Levin and many others. I just do not see how any White Person can still support Barry soetoro. Wait until we see all the ant-American and anti-White clauses in the obamacare disaster.
Below we have a great article from Ken Blackwell. He and the American Thinker are so refreshing during these times of living under the Marxist Regime.



Barack Obama: the Most Anti-Israel President!
By Ken Blackwell

With his remarks in Jakarta, Indonesia, President Obama made history once again. Sadly, it's a most unenviable title. I believe he is the most anti-Israel President in U.S. history.


In going to Jakarta, Indonesia, to launch his latest attack, he literally went to the ends of the earth to give voice to his displeasure. He emphasized his opposition to the policies of the elected government of Israel.


He used his Jakarta platform to complain about Israel building apartments for her growing population. Where? In Jerusalem, the capital of Israel.


To make matters even worse, Jakarta is a city no Israeli is allowed to enter! The symbolism of saying what he said in the country and city where he said it is simply atrocious.


He was in Indonesia less than 24 hours. If he had to make such a one-sided and unfair pronouncement, couldn't he at least have waited until he got to South Korea? Touting Indonesia's great tolerance is offensive. We love everyone here in Indonesia, except the Israelis, of course, and except Catholic school girls who get beheaded on their way to school.


What could he have been thinking in traveling to his boyhood home -- in what is widely described as the largest Muslim country in the world -- and sharply criticizing Israel? It's as if he is determined to take an unfriendly stance and to reinforce it with his own biography: This place was a second home to me, and I am telling you, Israel, to knock it off! Those were not his actual words, but how else can we interpret his bizarre sense of time and place?


President Obama's foreign policy puts much greater emphasis on the UN as a world body. He has changed previous policy by bowing to the UN's horrendous Human Rights Council. This is a body that contains Russia, China, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia -- those paragons of human rights. It is to this body that the Obama administration finds it necessary to "report." The reports we have submitted essentially apologize to these brutal despots at the UN for not fully implementing more of the Obama legislative agenda at home.


The President has admitted he and his party took a "shellacking" in the midterm elections. So implementation of that agenda looks increasingly problematic. Shellacking it may be, but you cannot put a high-gloss veneer on what happened November 2nd. Voters streamed into the polling places to render a vote of "no confidence" in this administration.


Interestingly, if the United States had a constitutional system similar to the parliamentary social democracies that Mr. Obama and so many of his liberal allies clearly favor, they would all be out of office. None of the leaders he will encounter in his G-20 meeting in South Korea this week would be appearing in the group photo if their parties had been given such a shellacking by the voters in their countries.


President Obama can thank his stars for the fact that under the United States Constitution, he still has a full two years to try to implement what's left of his program. He'll have a hard time doing it with 60+ new members of the House of Representatives who won their seats touting their staunch opposition to Obama policies.


Here's an idea he might suggest that could help build consensus and restore his frayed mandate: President Obama should announce that the U.S. Embassy in Israel will be moved -- to Jerusalem.


By doing that, he could demonstrate that he is not reflexively anti-Israel. Every other U.S. Embassy in the world is in the host nation's capital city. When Germany united twenty years ago, the new government there designated Berlin as their capital. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn obediently packed up and moved to Berlin in 1999.


By moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, he could reassure Israelis -- only 4% of whom think he is a friend of Israel. And he could show "the Muslim world" that he keeps trying to appease that the United States will not abandon its historic alliance with Israel. It's a sad commentary that such a reassurance is increasingly necessary.

Ken Blackwell is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council. He serves on the board of directors of the Club for Growth, National Taxpayers Union, and National Rifle Association and is co-author of The Blueprint: Obama's Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency.

Why Barry Does Not Address Connecticut Shootings

We have a post regarding the Connecticut Murderer. The question is asked, "why is Barry not commenting on this"? The Murderer happens to be Black and was caught on tape stealing. Now I do not know how racism can be called against Whites if they have the guy stealing caught on tape? I think any Business Owner wants good employees be they black or white. If this Murderer killed all White People, is that not a Hate crime? Of course not, as the Reverend Race Baiters (Sharpton, Jackson etc) get the last word on that. Also mentioned is how Barry was close to Ayers and Rev Wright. Remember we had this Video of Ayers and his sicko gang talking about killing WHITE Babies. Well Eric Holder can just look in the mirror to find a Coward and the same with barry.
The article below is by the great writer, Jack Cashill.

Why Obama Does Not Address Connecticut Shootings
By Jack Cashill

A week ago, as is well enough known, Omar Thornton shot and killed eight of his coworkers while being escorted out of the building after having been terminated by his employer, a Connecticut beer distributor.


As I write this, President Barack Obama has yet to address this subject in any public way. He is not alone in his restraint. The media have soft-pedaled the motive -- the whole shooting, for that matter. Four days after the fact, my wife, who watches CNN and listens to NPR, had not heard about it. Unlike, say, Oklahoma City or even Columbine, the tragedy served no useful political purpose. Just the opposite.


"You probably want to know the reason why I shot this place up," Thornton told the dispatcher in his final 9-11 call. "This place is a racist place. They're treating me bad over here. And treat all other black employees bad over here, too. So I took it to my own hands and handled the problem. I wish I could have got more of the people." For a media desperately seeking a whiff of Tea Party violence, this was not welcome news.


To the degree that the media have covered the subject, they have largely taken Thornton at his word. "Beer warehouse shooter long complained of racism," read the headline of a typically sympathetic Associated Press article. The AP shies from concluding what it should have: The complaints may have been real, but the inspiration for those complaints ranged from the trivial to the imaginary.


During Thornton's well-paid tenure at Hartford Distributors, there had been no claims of "racial insensitivity" made by him or anyone else through the company's anti-harassment policy, the union grievance process, or state and federal agencies. The company asked Thornton to resign only after he had been caught stealing beer.


Given the higher threshold of proof HR managers require for protected classes, especially blacks -- "If you're white, male, and under 40," one HR exec joked to me, "we just kick your butt out" -- Hartford did not terminate Thornton until Thornton was caught on video stealing. It was not his first offense.


For Obama, this should have been a teachable moment. He could have shown black Americans the extraordinary safeguards the corporate world has put into place to protect their rights. He could have explored the historic roots of the deep-seated paranoia that undermines black self-confidence and explained the burden that paranoia puts on black ambition, but he has done no such thing. In that void, many blacks, and not a few whites, will insist on seeing Thornton as more of a martyr than a madman.


Author Shelby Steele, who is biracial himself, has seen these kind of scenarios played out around him from the time he was a boy in a still-segregated world. In his underappreciated 2008 book, The Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can't Win, Steele dissected Obama's soul with more precision than anyone before or since, and he did so before Obama had won a primary. The book's subtitle, by the way, only seems to suggest a miscalculation on Steele's part. The "win" does not refer to the election.


Obama's dilemma, as Steele sees it, is that in his lifelong quest to seem an "authentic" black man, Obama feels compelled to exaggerate the state of black victimization. Rather than fixing problems, many of which are generated within the black community, the newly authentic Obama fixes blame.


When Obama has attempted to address moral issues, some more authentic black leader can be counted on to slap him down, as Jesse Jackson did in July 2008 when he threatened "to cut his nuts off." This posture does not make for a useful governing strategy. Instead, says Steele, it "commits [Obama] to a manipulation of the very society he seeks to lead."


Unfortunately, Obama did not look to Shelby Steele as a potential mentor. For guidance, he looked to people like Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. The good Reverend relentlessly instructed his congregants, says Steele, "to think and act as if the exaggerated poetic truth of white racism is the literal truth." Writing well before anyone had seen those telltale videos, Steele asks a fundamental question: How could Obama "sit every week in a church preaching blackness and not object"?


Ayers, the man who in Dreams From My Father lent Obama his voice on the subject of blackness, gives all appearances of being white. Skin color aside, Ayers and Obama had much in common. Both grew up in comfortable white households, attended idyllic, largely white prep schools, and have struggled to find an identity as righteous black men ever since.


Although Ayers rages at "structural racism" in all of his books, that rage reaches a primal scream stage in Race Course: Against White Supremacy, a book he co-wrote with wife Bernardine Dohrn after Obama's election. One would think that victory would have eased the pain, but it has done no such thing for Ayers and any number of other radicals, black and white.


Among the eternally irritated tenured radicals is Tim Wise, author of Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama. Self-described as an "Angry White Male" in the title of one of his earlier works, Wise penned his jeremiad post-election precisely to deny whites even a moment of self-congratulation.


In his book, Wise quickly reassures his audience that the "deep-seated cultural malady" of racism has been "neither eradicated nor even substantially diminished by Obama's victory." To support his arguments, he marshals the most outlandish set of statistics I have seen in a book that was not self-published.


Wise, like all believers in institutional racism, sees remediation only through "productive anti-racism and social justice work." In a similar spirit, Ayers rejects any easy "end-of-white-supremacy narrative." He fears that Obama's victory may actually set back the cause of social justice by taking black concerns off the table to preserve the illusion of racial harmony.

For Ayers, social justice means nothing less than communism, albeit with a small "c." In 1993, a year before Dreams was finally written, Ayers would concede in an interview for the book Sixties Radicals, Then and Now, "Maybe I'm the last communist who is willing to admit it."

Listening to these radical voices, Steele believes, has kept Obama a "bound man." He is not allowed to extrapolate from his own experience and preach the value of education, marriage, family, hard work, and success. At exactly the wrong moment, Ayers and Wright crawled into Obama's head and shielded their charge from his better angels.

The duo had the chance to help Obama establish himself as his own man, but instead, they insisted that, to be authentic, a black man must rage at the machine -- which is what Omar Thornton did to the very end, violently. If Obama argued for redemption through self-help, his core supporters, black and white, would deny him his authenticity. For someone who has struggled so long and hard to establish an identity as a black man, that denial is scarier than defeat. This is why, implies Steele, "He Can't Win."

Ron Klein's Negative Campaign Attacks Allen West

Those of us in South Florida are tired of despicable Democrats ruining our State. We will not forget we had WexLiar (Wexler) as a local Politician yet where did he reside? Kentucky or Detroit or wherever it was, Florida was not his home. This Klein is in the same mold of WexLiar. They promoted Billy Clinton like he was a savior. Now they believe any criticism thrown at HARVARD Barry Soetoro is Racist. Yet, why is not Racist when a lowlife, weasel Democrat launches a campaign of lies about Allen West? Oh I see, only liberals and self Loathing whites and blacks are victims of Racism.

I hope you will read the letter below which was written by Allen West.

Dear Fellow Patriots:

Over the last couple of weeks, it has become apparent that Ron Klein will run a decidedly negative campaign aimed at character assassination since his policies have been a complete failure to South Floridians. As unemployment continues to rise and foreclosures continue to pile up - all under Klein's watch - he is running from his record and has dispatched his political henchmen to do his dirty work.

Insidious child-like name calling emanating from those on the far left is of no consequence to a professional Soldier who has fought in several combat zones. However, there is a clear hypocrisy when you consider any statement against President Obama's policies results in claims of racism, while a decorated combat veteran gets called a "dangerous extremist." Yet again, we see the fear and desperation of liberals when a minority political figure escapes their modern day plantation and promotes a conservative ideology of individual responsibility and accountability, free market solutions, American values and leadership, and national security.

Maybe Klein and his political hacks need a history lesson. The British once called our Founding Fathers radicals and extremists, but all Americans today call them Patriots.

As Klein and his ultra-Liberal supports try to rob the citizens of South Florida of a campaign based on issues and substance, I will continue to run a campaign that will clearly contrast the choices the voters have on November 2nd. I will go to Congress and cut taxes - Klein has and continues to support tax increases. I aim to cut government spending, while Klein has voted for numerous massive spending increases. I will work tirelessly to enact policies that will unleash the American worker and strengthen small businesses. Klein's policies have stifled our economy.

It comes down to a simple question - are the good people of District 22 better off today than they were in 2007? If not, the choice on November 2nd is clear.

Steadfast and Loyal,

LTC (Ret) Allen B. West
Please support Allen West HERE

Barack The Angry Community Organizer

This Video does not need many words to explain it. HARVARD Barry Soetoro must be stopped politically! He is pursuing the Cloward & Piven strategy right now.

SHOCKING Obama words: Bombshell Anti-White audio uncovered!

The Left Wing continues to shove HARVARD Political Correctness down our throats. More and more we see why Soetoro is not fit to be TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States).


Hat Tip to the Patriot, @genjunky

Marxists & Black Liberation Theology Thuggery

When will the slow thinking Americans who lean left wake up? Lachlan Markay has a very insightful article below on the Left attacking Conservatives and Tea Party Members. The Left shouts "Racist" and the fringe Media gives them some running room with the lies. The Left can re-write history all they want. We know they started the KKK, wanted to keep Slaves and still try and keep the poor under their thumb. Even currently we have the Left spouting all the Racist verbiage. Lowlife Sherrods, Biden, Reid, Maxine Waters , Barbara Boxer, Sheila Jackson Jess Lee and on and on!


Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But 'Effective,' Media Ignore

By Lachlan Markay
What will it take for the media to acknowledge that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, and that liberals have smeared it as such in a naked politicization of race relations? How about a lefty activist admitting just that.

UPenn professor Mary Frances Berry, a leader of the "far-left black political scene," as NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield wrote, penned this astonishing email to Politico, published on July 20:

Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.

Dick Armey could not have said it better.

The strategy is, of course, reprehensible, but members of the Tea Party movement have long suspected that accusations of racism were nothing more than elements of a political ploy motivated by a fear that the movement's influence could spell disaster for Democrats in November and beyond.

Rather than discuss the issues, these smear artists allege racism since it immediately puts political opponents on the defensive, preventing them from pushing lines of argument to which most Americans are sympathetic.

That Berry specifically mentioned joblessness as an issue that can be dodged by crying racism demonstrates just how desperate liberals are to avoid discussing the still-sagging economy. It's a losing issue for Democrats, and their supporters know it. By dubbing the critics of Democratic economic policy racists, they can avoid discussion of the failures of their own policies.

Coverage of this outrageous statement from the mainstream media: practically zero. Hannity has mentioned it a couple times, and Politico, of course, has acknowledged it.

But almost every other major news outlet - ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, Newsweek, Time - has completely ignored the statement, according to a Nexis search. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund mentioned it on CBS's Face the Nation and on CNN Newsroom, but neither outlet covered the topic on its own, or followed up on Fund's statements. Mary Matalin mentioned it on the Situation Room, but once again, it took a conservative guest for the statement to even be acknowledged, and no one followed up.

And of course, the same media outlets ignoring this story have frequently trumpeted accusations of racism directed at the Tea Party as fact. The most notorious example - the alleged racial slurs shouted at Members of Congress before the health care vote - has even recently been treated as fact, despite the complete absence of evidence supporting the accusation.

Maybe Berry's statement will help convince these journalists that they are aiding and abetting not only political character assassination against an organic, Jeffersonian movement, but that they are in fact aiding the degradation of American race relations, as R. Dozier Gray, spokesman for the black conservative group Project 21 notes:


This willful and purposeful use of the race card for nothing more than political gain is toxic to race relations, and Mary Frances Berry must know that. But she evidently does not care. Based on her comment, political posturing takes primacy over whatever real issues regarding race that she might pretend are her calling cards. I have seen this all before. I find it shameful.

—Lachlan Markay is an associate with Dialog New Media

Don't Be Intimidated By the Race Hustling Democrats

If Barack Obama really is a post-racial president, then why are so many liberals crying racism at those who criticize the president?
Why can't a White Person be able to voice their objection to a Marxist ideology being shoved down their throats without being called a Racist?
Why doesn't Obama or sotomayor ever suggest they are not Racist. They simply use Alinsky tactics and point out other racists.

Hating Whitey Makes Unexpected Comeback

Written by Kyle-Anne Shiver

Here we are only nine months into the ubiquitously proclaimed "post-racial presidency," and all that promised harmony among the races has disappeared faster than a Chicago minute. All it took for addled minds to conjure shadows of racism behind every whitey tree in the whole American forest were voices raised in dissent over the President's far-left policies.

No sooner had congress' summer recess begun -- without the President's hoped-for passage of Obamacare -- than the racist cries began their assent. Nancy Pelosi threw down the "swastika" gauntlet aimed at townhall attendees, which essentially tarred those citizens with white-supremacy slander. In early August an African-American MSNBC newsman actually declared that the word, "socialist," being used to define Obama policies, was a new "code word" for "N**ger."

Then, Joe Wilson's impolite, but factually accurate blurt of "You lie," aimed at the President's claim regarding illegal alien coverage in the healthcare bill, was hailed as racially motivated by liberals at every level. Maureen Dowd penned a wicked screed, swearing she heard Wilson use the word, "Boy," even though no one else did - not even the recording devices. Jimmy Carter doddered forth with his feeble opinion in public, concluding that of course, the outpouring dissent had to be racist. Even Bill Cosby chimed in on the so-called white-racist motivations.

Interestingly enough, before the election, far-left feminist icon, Erica Jong, gave an interview to the Italian press, details of which were reported by the U.K. Telegraph. Jong was taking daily doses of Valium, she said, just to deal with her "pre-election anxiety." If Obama were not elected, she contended, then it would start a "second civil war" and "blood would run in the streets." Jong confided that her writer friends were equally traumatized, that Naomi Wolf was calling her every day, that Ken Follett was "extremely worried" and that Jane Fonda had sent her an email claiming that she "cried all night and can't cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves."

Well, we had the election. White America came through. Now, where's all that absolution, honey?

From anyone's pre-election calculations, an Obama presidency held the promise of relieving America's white citizens of their centuries-long guilt over slavery and civil-rights injustices. Such, however, has not been at all the case and hating whitey is making an unexpected comeback.

There was President Obama's own "teaching moment" on race wherein he reminded us we are still a racist nation where white police officers act "stupidly" against black professor-types just because of the color of their skin. Even the beer-fest afterward left divisive hard feelings and rancor among unjustly accused police officers.

Last week we saw the racist fires stoked against Rush Limbaugh for the "crime" of wishing to purchase part ownership in the St. Louis Rams. Media outlets from coast to coast used false and slanderous quotes to justify the rhetorical lynching of Limbaugh. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both with more than a few anti-Semitic slurs in their pasts, blasted Limbaugh with false racist charges. An MSNBC contributor remarked that many NFL players had said they wouldn't play for a team owned by Limbaugh because he "would just love to say he owned a plantation full of black men."

But the real cake-taker in this poisonous concoction is the proclamation by Louis Farrakhan in Memphis this week. Farrakhan spoke to a hall full of people who were gathered to celebrate the 14th anniversary of his Million Man March (attended by Barack Obama). This week he warned his Nation of Islam followers not to "become complacent" because of the election of the first black president. Speaking of Obama's election, Farrakhan said "This can pacify you and lull you to sleep in a dangerous time, making you think that we live in a post-racial America-when the opposite is true."

Now, I'm not one generally inclined to agree with the audaciously Hitler-celebrating head of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan. But on the matter of a post-racial America he would seem to be nailing it. Anyone still believing in the promise of Barack Obama bringing racial peace, harmony and Christian forgiveness to White America might be suffering from a severe case of willful blindness.

When every utterance of disagreement with a president is framed as bigotry and racism, then the old black separatists' call to hate whitey has made a sure comeback and there isn't a thing Christian about it.

In fact, it would seem a very Jeremiah Wright inspired phenomenon. Lest we forget, Jeremiah Wright bestowed the lifetime service award from his church on Louis Farrakhan. Barack Obama seems to have soaked up a whole lot more from Wright and Farrakhan than he let on during the campaign. If the President is not stoking the resurgence of racial hatred, he certainly has done nothing substantial to stop it either.

Perhaps we should have paid a bit more heed to those racist associations of Barack Obama's, because in the infamous words of Spike Lee's Malcolm X, it certainly appears we whitey Americans have been utterly and thoroughly "bamboozled."
Written by Kyle-Anne Shiver