Showing posts with label Defund-UN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Defund-UN. Show all posts
Saturday, December 15, 2012
The Bush Inheritance? - Get Real Barry!
Hat Tip to Mr. I
The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember the day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(By the way: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
Lowlife BARRY OBAMA and the Democrat Congress
So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving.
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress
since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 &2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, disgusting Democrats in Congress took control of spending. Barack Obama loved these big spending bills which were nothing compared to his catastrophe.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from vile Democrats like himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.
Labels:
barney-frank-crook,
chris-dodd-crook,
coward-democrats,
Defund-UN,
George-Bush,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Marxist-media,
Mr-I,
MSM-Frauds,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Senator Stabenow Porker of the Month
Washington, D.C.) – Today, in recognition of the potfuls of taxpayer gold that have been squandered on subsidizing ill-advised green energy programs, Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) named Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) its March 2012 Porker of the Month.
Sen. Stabenow was chosen for submitting amendment #1812 to S. 1813, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, which would have extended federal subsidies for green energy, including alternative fueling stations, biofuels, refined coal, energy-efficient appliances, and wind power, among others. Many of the initiatives singled out for continued subsidies in Sen. Stabenow’s amendment, such as the Treasury Department’s 1603 grants, the Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit, and the tax credit for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling, were expanded or begun as part of the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (stimulus).
Fortunately, the amendment was defeated on March 13 when it garnered just 49 votes in its favor, 11 short of the 60 it required. Taxpayers need look no further than Advanced Ethanol Council Executive Director Brooke Coleman’s reaction to the amendment’s failure to know that it was a win for their wallets; he claimed that lawmakers “missed an opportunity” by failing to extend the Cellulosic Biofuels Producer Tax Credit, which eases the way for America’s expensive ethanol program.
Sen. Stabenow’s amendment exemplifies the public policy fallacy gripping the Obama administration and many lawmakers, which holds that the key to unlocking a green energy surge is simply more taxpayer money. But as Washington Post columnist Charles Lane put it in his March 5, 2012 column, “Advocates insist that the government should help them crank up mass production of electric vehicles. Once economies of scale kick in, they argue, electric vehicles can compete…Four decades after the 1973 oil crisis, this logic is wearing thin. Any company that figured out how to build a practical mass-market electric car would be swimming in cash. That no one has done so suggests we are bumping up against the limits of nature, not just politics or economics.”
“When the stimulus originally passed, one of the biggest concerns, beyond its exorbitant initial cost, was that supposedly temporary programs would become permanent and waste taxpayer dollars in perpetuity,” said CAGW President Tom Schatz. “Sen. Stabenow has demonstrated that those fears were not unfounded. The past six months have been marred by examples of the futility of picking winners in energy markets, which already have access to private capital. Failures at Solyndra, Ener1, Beacon, Tesla, Amonix, Evergreen Solar, SpectraWatt, SunPower, and others make it obvious that the government has about as much chance of stumbling across a four-leaf clover as it does of being successful as a venture capitalist,” added Schatz. “Not only should these programs not be extended, they should be terminated.”
For attempting to compound the federal government’s costly foray into green energy investment, and doing her best to bury taxpayer greenbacks at the end of the rainbow, Senator Debbie Stabenow is CAGW’s March 2012 Porker of the Month.
CAGW is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government. Porker of the Month is a dubious honor given to lawmakers, government officials, and political candidates who have shown a blatant disregard for the interests of taxpayers.
Sen. Stabenow was chosen for submitting amendment #1812 to S. 1813, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, which would have extended federal subsidies for green energy, including alternative fueling stations, biofuels, refined coal, energy-efficient appliances, and wind power, among others. Many of the initiatives singled out for continued subsidies in Sen. Stabenow’s amendment, such as the Treasury Department’s 1603 grants, the Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit, and the tax credit for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling, were expanded or begun as part of the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (stimulus).
Fortunately, the amendment was defeated on March 13 when it garnered just 49 votes in its favor, 11 short of the 60 it required. Taxpayers need look no further than Advanced Ethanol Council Executive Director Brooke Coleman’s reaction to the amendment’s failure to know that it was a win for their wallets; he claimed that lawmakers “missed an opportunity” by failing to extend the Cellulosic Biofuels Producer Tax Credit, which eases the way for America’s expensive ethanol program.
Sen. Stabenow’s amendment exemplifies the public policy fallacy gripping the Obama administration and many lawmakers, which holds that the key to unlocking a green energy surge is simply more taxpayer money. But as Washington Post columnist Charles Lane put it in his March 5, 2012 column, “Advocates insist that the government should help them crank up mass production of electric vehicles. Once economies of scale kick in, they argue, electric vehicles can compete…Four decades after the 1973 oil crisis, this logic is wearing thin. Any company that figured out how to build a practical mass-market electric car would be swimming in cash. That no one has done so suggests we are bumping up against the limits of nature, not just politics or economics.”
“When the stimulus originally passed, one of the biggest concerns, beyond its exorbitant initial cost, was that supposedly temporary programs would become permanent and waste taxpayer dollars in perpetuity,” said CAGW President Tom Schatz. “Sen. Stabenow has demonstrated that those fears were not unfounded. The past six months have been marred by examples of the futility of picking winners in energy markets, which already have access to private capital. Failures at Solyndra, Ener1, Beacon, Tesla, Amonix, Evergreen Solar, SpectraWatt, SunPower, and others make it obvious that the government has about as much chance of stumbling across a four-leaf clover as it does of being successful as a venture capitalist,” added Schatz. “Not only should these programs not be extended, they should be terminated.”
For attempting to compound the federal government’s costly foray into green energy investment, and doing her best to bury taxpayer greenbacks at the end of the rainbow, Senator Debbie Stabenow is CAGW’s March 2012 Porker of the Month.
CAGW is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government. Porker of the Month is a dubious honor given to lawmakers, government officials, and political candidates who have shown a blatant disregard for the interests of taxpayers.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Hands Off My Health Care Barry!
Americans for Prosperity to Hold Historic “Hands Off My Health Care” Rally in DC as Supreme Court Takes Up Legal Challenge to Obamacare
The rally will be on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 1:00 PM (ET) in Washington, DC
AFP Citizen Activists, Including Nearly 1,000 from New York and New Jersey, Will Descend on DC and Call on Supreme Court to Strike Down Unconstitutional Government Takeover of Health Care
BOGOTA, NJ – Americans for Prosperity, the state’s leading free-market, grassroots organization will deliver close to a thousand citizen activists from the New York/New Jersey area to Washington, D.C. this coming Tuesday, March 27, for the group’s “Hands Off My Health Care” rally.
The rally will take place in Upper Senate Park, near the Supreme Court Building, as the nation’s highest court takes up the most important case in a generation: the multi-state challenge to the constitutionality of the government health care takeover.
The “Hands Off My Health Care” rally is expected to draw thousands of citizen activists from across the country and will be headlined by numerous congressional leaders, including Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Rep. Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota, Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina.
Americans for Prosperity state director Steve Lonegan has issued the following statement in advance of next week’s momentous rally.
“Two years ago, despite months of public opposition and outcry, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the Democratic Congress rammed through their government health care takeover, trampling on the Constitution and violating the right of American citizens to make their own health care choices.
“The burden now falls on the Supreme Court to preserve, protect and defend those precious freedoms bequeathed to us by the framers. The Court must rule the individual mandate, compelling American citizens to purchase health insurance against their will, to be unconstitutional, inseverable from the rest of the law and, thus, strike down this vicious assault on our rights in toto.
“On Tuesday, thousands of patriots from across the country will gather in Washington, D.C. to deliver this very message to the nine Supreme Court justices and to the nation at large: We will not stand for our Constitutional rights and liberties to be infringed. We demand that this law be overturned”
Coalition Co-sponsors include:
60 Plus Association
American Doctors for Truth
Americans for Tax Reform
Concerned Women for America
Doctor Patient Medical Association
Eagle Forum
Family Research Council
Hagerstown Tea Party
Heartland Institute
Institute for Liberty
Let Freedom Ring
Restore America's Voice Now
Smart Girl Politics
Students for Life
The Richmond Patriots
TeaParty.net
Tea Party Express
Tea Party Patriots
Tea Party WDC
The Mommy Lobby
---
Obamacare Will Have Tax Hikes on Young Adults and Children
The jobs-killing Obamacare law contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and employers. Many of these tax increases fall on families making less than $250,000 — a direct violation of candidate Obama’s promise not to raise “any form” of taxes on these families.
Out of the 20 new or higher taxes in Obamacare, there are four that most hurt young adults and children. Every single one of these taxes violates President Obama’s “firm pledge” not to raise any form of taxes on families making less than $250,000.
The first is the “individual mandate” excise tax. Under Obamacare, all young adults must purchase “qualifying health insurance” (defined by unelected federal bureaucrats) or face an excise tax penalty of at least 2.5 percent of adjusted gross income. For many people in their late 20s or early 30s, health insurance may not fit into a budget that includes paying back student loans, starting a family or finding a job. Others might want to obtain health insurance, but find their preferred plan is no longer “qualified” by President Obama’s HHS bureaucrats. Raising taxes on young people is the wrong way to get them to buy health insurance.
The second Obamacare tax hike on young adults and kids is the “medicine cabinet tax.” This tax increase is already in effect. Since January of 2011, young people have not been able to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines from their flex-spending accounts (FSAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs). Since many young people require only light use of medical providers and can treat many illnesses over the counter, this tax increase falls on a large percentage of their actual out-of-pocket health expenditures.
The third Obamacare tax hike on young adults and kids is on FSAs. Many young people and parents of young children participate in flex accounts (FSAs) at work. Obamacare imposes a new cap of $2,500 per year on these accounts, which currently face no limits from the tax code. This will, again, fall largely on parents with young children. Consider braces, for example. A parent needing to buy a $4,000 pair of braces might want to run that cost through their flex account to make it pre-tax. A $2,500 cap makes that impossible for the whole cost.
Labels:
americans-for-prosperity,
DEFICIT-SPENDING,
Defund-UN,
Democrats-Lie,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
fiscal-Conservative,
obama-bankrupting-America,
Obamacare,
obamas-war-against-women,
Paul-Ryan,
tax-and-spend
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Dismantling Obamacare
Today we have a very important message from Congressman Patrick McHenry with the House Conservatives Fund.
Dear Conservatives of America,
While the rest of the world has been focused on the new iPad this week, conservative Republicans in the House have been focused on IPAB. IPAB -- the Independent Payment Advisory Board -- is the panel of un-elected bureaucrats who will be making decisions about your health under Obamacare.
This week, we scored a major victory in our ultimate goal of full repeal of Obamacare, as two key House Committees under pressure from conservatives in the House voted to repeal IPAB altogether.
IPAB is one of the worst parts (of many) that make up Obamacare. As one expert recently warned before the House Ways and Means Committee, IPAB “absolutely will” lead to rationing health care.
For a more thorough look at how IPAB would ration care under the guise of “cost containment” read this Forbes Op/Ed: “President Obama’s Dangerous New Medical Board”
President Obama is doubling down on one of the most dangerous provisions in his 2010 health overhaul law. In his proposed budget, he plans to give even greater powers to the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a panel created by the new health law to contain Medicare spending.
The IPAB is one of the most egregious parts of ObamaCare because it puts rationing of care on auto pilot. A House subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), is expected to vote today on a bill that would repeal the IPAB entirely. The Ways and Means Committee also will vote, and then it will go to the full House of Representatives for a vote, likely next month. After that, the legislation faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) just introduced an IPAB repeal bill.
Click here to continue reading on Forbes. It is a very informative article.
Whether it’s outright repeal or dismantling Obamacare until it collapses under its own weight, conservatives in the House are 100% committed to ending this disaster. The House Conservatives Fund will only endorse candidates that are also committed to ending Obamacare.
Please take a minute to share the good news about IPAB repeal with your friends on Facebook.
Thanks for your support.
Sincerely,
Congressman Patrick McHenry
House Conservatives Fund
You can Contribute to The House Conservative Fund HERE
Dear Conservatives of America,
While the rest of the world has been focused on the new iPad this week, conservative Republicans in the House have been focused on IPAB. IPAB -- the Independent Payment Advisory Board -- is the panel of un-elected bureaucrats who will be making decisions about your health under Obamacare.
This week, we scored a major victory in our ultimate goal of full repeal of Obamacare, as two key House Committees under pressure from conservatives in the House voted to repeal IPAB altogether.
IPAB is one of the worst parts (of many) that make up Obamacare. As one expert recently warned before the House Ways and Means Committee, IPAB “absolutely will” lead to rationing health care.
For a more thorough look at how IPAB would ration care under the guise of “cost containment” read this Forbes Op/Ed: “President Obama’s Dangerous New Medical Board”
President Obama is doubling down on one of the most dangerous provisions in his 2010 health overhaul law. In his proposed budget, he plans to give even greater powers to the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a panel created by the new health law to contain Medicare spending.
The IPAB is one of the most egregious parts of ObamaCare because it puts rationing of care on auto pilot. A House subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA), is expected to vote today on a bill that would repeal the IPAB entirely. The Ways and Means Committee also will vote, and then it will go to the full House of Representatives for a vote, likely next month. After that, the legislation faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) just introduced an IPAB repeal bill.
Click here to continue reading on Forbes. It is a very informative article.
Whether it’s outright repeal or dismantling Obamacare until it collapses under its own weight, conservatives in the House are 100% committed to ending this disaster. The House Conservatives Fund will only endorse candidates that are also committed to ending Obamacare.
Please take a minute to share the good news about IPAB repeal with your friends on Facebook.
Thanks for your support.
Sincerely,
Congressman Patrick McHenry
House Conservatives Fund
You can Contribute to The House Conservative Fund HERE
Friday, February 24, 2012
Muslims Boycott Jewish Medical Inventions

Why does Barry Soetoro bow to the Muslim Dictators while throwing Israel under the Bus?
Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged Muslims to boycott everything that originates with the Jews.
In response, Meyer M. Treinkman, a pharmacist, out of the kindness of his heart,offered to assist them in their boycott as follows:
"Any Muslim who has Syphilis must not be cured by Salvarsan discovered by a Jew, Dr. Ehrlich. He should not even try to find out whether he has Syphilis, because the Wasserman Test is the discovery of a Jew. If a Muslim suspects that he has Gonorrhea, he must not seek diagnosis, because he will be using the method of a Jew named Neissner.
"A Muslim who has heart disease must not use Digitalis, a discovery by a Jew, Ludwig Traube.
Should he suffer with a toothache, he must not use Novocaine, a discovery of the Jews, Widal and Weil.
If a Muslim has Diabetes, he must not use Insulin, the result of research by Minkowsky, a Jew. If one has a headache, he must shun Pyramidon and Antypyrin, due to the Jews, Spiro and Ellege.
Muslims with convulsions must put up with them because it was a Jew, Oscar Leibreich, who proposed the use of Chloral Hydrate.
Arabs must do likewise with their psychic ailments because Freud, father of psychoanalysis, was a Jew.
Should a Muslim child get Diphtheria, he must refrain from the "Schick" reaction which was invented by the Jew, Bella Schick.
"Muslims should be ready to die in great numbers and must not permit treatment of ear and brain damage, work of Jewish Nobel Prize winner, Robert Baram.
They should continue to die or remain crippled by Infantile Paralysis because the discoverer of the anti-polio vaccine is a Jew, Jonas Salk.
"Muslims must refuse to use Streptomycin and continue to die of Tuberculosis because a Jew, Zalman Waxman, invented the wonder drug against this killing disease.
Muslim doctors must discard all discoveries and improvements by dermatologist Judas Sehn Benedict, or the lung specialist, Frawnkel, and of many other world renowned Jewish scientists and medical experts.
"In short, good and loyal Muslims properly and fittingly should remain afflicted with Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Heart Disease, Headaches, Typhus, Diabetes, Mental Disorders, Polio, Convulsions and Tuberculosis and be proud to obey the Islamic boycott."
Oh, and by the way, don't call for a doctor on your cell phone because the cell phone was invented in Israel by a Jewish engineer.
Meanwhile I ask, what medical contributions to the world have the Muslims made?
Labels:
Defund-UN,
Democrats-Lie,
Enemy-within,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Helen-Thomas,
Media-Supporting-Marxists,
Racist-Liberals,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
stop-sharia-law,
support-Israel,
support-seal-team-six
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Marxist Socialist Mindset of BHO
We have a Letter to the Editor of the "Tico Times" in Costa Rica. Yes the MSM (Media Supporting Marxists) is all across the Globe.
Dear Editor:
I see from your editorial that you think the platitudes that Obama expressed in his State of the Union speech was something that Costa Rica should emulate, but I guess you didn't read his previous State of the Union speeches? Much of what he said wasn't new , it was recycled, tired old policies he didn't follow through on before. He is a president who will not follow through on his high sounding proposals.
Remember, this is the same guy that voted 130 times "present" as a State Senator in Illinois. He will say anything and do anything that might get a vote from a special interest group, just to get re-elected. Many politicians do that, but Obama is particularly adept at saying something, but doing nothing.
Being of a Marxist / Socialist mindset, he thinks that the driving force to prosperity is the government not the free enterprise system. That's why our economy is still stagnant instead of roaring back from a deep recession. It looks like it will have to take a change in leadership for us to finally rebound, and then Costa Rica and the other democratic countries of Latin America, will come along for the ride to prosperity.
Remember, Obama is a narcissist in an empty Armani suit. Don't be fooled by his "silver tongue", because he is actually sticking it out to all of us. You can't polish horse manure.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side

Dear Editor:
I see from your editorial that you think the platitudes that Obama expressed in his State of the Union speech was something that Costa Rica should emulate, but I guess you didn't read his previous State of the Union speeches? Much of what he said wasn't new , it was recycled, tired old policies he didn't follow through on before. He is a president who will not follow through on his high sounding proposals.
Remember, this is the same guy that voted 130 times "present" as a State Senator in Illinois. He will say anything and do anything that might get a vote from a special interest group, just to get re-elected. Many politicians do that, but Obama is particularly adept at saying something, but doing nothing.
Being of a Marxist / Socialist mindset, he thinks that the driving force to prosperity is the government not the free enterprise system. That's why our economy is still stagnant instead of roaring back from a deep recession. It looks like it will have to take a change in leadership for us to finally rebound, and then Costa Rica and the other democratic countries of Latin America, will come along for the ride to prosperity.
Remember, Obama is a narcissist in an empty Armani suit. Don't be fooled by his "silver tongue", because he is actually sticking it out to all of us. You can't polish horse manure.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side

Labels:
Defund-UN,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
fire-sotomayor,
Hillary-supports-Marx,
Left-Wing-Nazis,
Media-Supporting-Marxists,
MSM-Frauds,
Stop-Illegal-Immigration,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
stop-sharia-law
Friday, February 3, 2012
MORT’s Meanderings
Hello, Tea Party:
It has been my observation that very few of the folks I’ve met ‘On the Corner’ with the Ft. Lauderdale TeaParty or at other gatherings of TeaParty folks, are political junkies.
For the most part, they are just plain patriotic American citizens who began to feel uneasy with the policies and direction of Obama & Co. and finally arrived at a point when they realized that our beloved nation and the traditional freedoms we’ve enjoyed since the founding of this country, were being stolen from us. Stolen by our very own elected administration and by our Government, at all levels. These citizens became ‘itchy’, looked around and found that they were not itching alone. They discovered their closest Tea Party group, became active – and began to open their eyes and ears to some of the painful facts of political life. They came alive; they became involved.
Fast forward to the 2010 election and the stunning achievement of Conservatism taking over the U.S. House of Representatives and replacing some Democrats with of all things - Republicans. We were all flushed with this signal victory over one half the Legislative Branch. Score a big one for the Tea Party. And so many folks, having sent their candidate to Wash, DC, curtailed their activism or slowed their involvement. They sat back to await their victory to bear fruit.
Fast forward again, to the results of several controversial bills voted-on in the House by recently-elected ‘Tea Party’ freshmen. Supporters began to question the votes cast by ‘our’ Reps in Congress. Their votes differed from the gut feelings and unyielding positions of many of the Tea Partiers who voted them into office. Some expressed dismay and wondered aloud, “What the hell is going on, here?”
What was and is going on here, is that the Tea Party freshman are feeling the pressure from the ‘old boy network’ and the boiling cauldron that is, Washington politics. While it is perfectly true that we have every right to expect that each and every one of them will locate his or her backbone and core principles - and act accordingly, it up to each and every one of us as their constituents, to demonstrate to them our faith and support. It is up to us to back them up and to contact them directly to let them know in clear, concise, straight-forward language without rancor, that we are seriously interested in what they are doing. It is called, ‘interaction’. We have that obligation as voting citizens.
We are not privy to all the information they receive, either public or classified. We are not always aware of the pressures they are confronted with on a daily basis. We have no clue as to what other influences might be pressing them. They need to know that we are right behind them. Still, the same Team that voting them into office to represent us. We cannot expect them to perform with honor as our representatives, unless we stay in close touch with them and keep them aware of how we are feeling about the issues they are dealing with. And, we must let them know clearly, what we expect of them. We might not always see them vote as we would like but, there can be no space between we who elected them and those whom we’ve sent to Washington. We owe them that. We owe that to our nation. We owe that to ourselves.
So, I say to my Tea Party brothers and sisters: Stay involved. Stay with our Tea Party ‘freshmen’ and do what it takes to make those men and women, our Tea Party ‘sophomores’.
Steady. Steady.
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2012
Labels:
Conservatism,
Defund-NPR,
Defund-UN,
Democrat-Lies,
Democrats-support-Marxism,
fire-Wasserman-Schultz,
Mort-Kuff,
MORTs-Meanderings,
Support-Our-Troops,
Tea-Party,
Veterans
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Top 5 Failed Barry Soetoro Policies
Obama Promised Big Things, But The Promises He Actually Followed Through On Have Hurt More Than They've Helped
THE STIMULUS
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Keep Unemployment Below 8 Percent As Obama Promised
Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Failed To Keep The Unemployment Rate Below The 8 Percent And Is Nowhere Close To The 6 Percent They Predicted It Would Be At By Now. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12; Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09; Congressional Budget Office, 5/25/11)
Instead, Since The Stimulus Was Passed, The Unemployment Rate Has Increased From 8.2 Percent To 8.5 Percent And Has Remained Above 8 Percent For A Post-WWII Record 35 Straight Months. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Unemployment Rate Peaked At 10.1 Percent In October 2009. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Create The Over 3.5 Million Jobs That His Advisors Predicted It Would Create
PROMISE: Obama's Advisors Predicted That The Stimulus Would Create Over 3.5 Million Jobs And Raise Payroll Employment To Over 137.5 Million By The Fourth Quarter Of 2010. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09)
FAILURE: Since President Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Passed, The Nation Has Lost 1.1 Million Jobs. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
At The End Of 2010, Payroll Employment Was Only 130.3 Million. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Washington Post's Fact Checker: "Obama Is On Track To Have The Worst Jobs Record Of Any President In The Modern Era." "Unless the economy turns around in the next 18 months, Obama is on track to have the worst jobs record of any president in the modern era. That would be an accurate statement." (Glenn Kessler, "Rick Perry's Claim That Obama Has 'Killed More Jobs' Than Any Other President," The Washington Post's "The Fact Checker", 8/22/11)
OBAMACARE
On CBS' "60 Minutes", Obama Called His Health Care Package One Of His Major Accomplishments
CBS' Steve Kroft: "Why do you think you deserve to be reelected? What have you accomplished?"
President Obama: "Not only saving this country from a great depression, not only saving the auto industry, but putting in place a system in which we're going to start lowering health care costs and you're never going to go bankrupt because you get sick or somebody in your family gets sick." (CBS' "60 Minutes," 12/11/11)
Yet ObamaCare Has Failed To Make Health Insurance More Affordable
PROMISE: Obama Promised His Plan "Would Save The Average Family $2,500 On Their Premiums." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks Of Senator Barack Obama's Plan To Fight For Working Families And Take On Special Interests In Washington, Indianapolis, IN, 6/20/08)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare Is Actually Making Health Care "Less Affordable." "At the moment, the new law is making health care slightly less affordable. Independent health care experts say the law has caused some insurance premiums to rise. As we wrote in October, the new law has caused about a 1 percent to 3 percent increase in health insurance premiums for employer-sponsored family plans because of requirements for increased benefits. Last year's premium increases cast even more doubt on another promise the president has made -- that the health care law would 'lower premiums by up to $2,500 for a typical family per year.'" (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Moreover, at this point it is debatable whether the law has made health care more affordable. Insurance premiums have gone up, in part because of new benefits mandated by the law." (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
"The Cost Of Health Insurance Skyrocketed In 2011 After Several Years Of Relatively Small Increases." (Jane M. Von Bergen, "Health Insurance Costs Skyrocketing," The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9/27/11)
Workers Paid An Average Of $132 More For Family Coverage This Year. "Although premiums rose, employers kept the percentage of the premium workers pay about the same: An average of 18 percent for single coverage and 28 percent for family plans. Still, with rising costs, workers paid more, up an average of $132 a year for family coverage. Since 1999, the dollar amount workers contribute toward premiums nationally has grown 168 percent, while their wages have grown by 50 percent, according to the survey." (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
Cost Of Single Employee Coverage Grew 8 Percent According To The Survey. "Family plan premiums hit $15,073 on average, while coverage for single employees grew 8 percent to $5,429, according to a survey released Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust. (KHN is an editorially-independent program of the foundation.)" (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
And Americans Are Losing Their Coverage
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That "If You Like Your Health Care Plan, You Will Be Able To Keep Your Health Care Plan. Period." OBAMA: "So let me begin by saying this: I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage - they like their plan and they value their relationship with their doctor. And that means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what. My view is that health care reform should be guided by a simple principle: fix what's broken and build on what works." (President Barack Obama, Address To The American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 6/15/09)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare "Falls Short Of Making Health Care 'Affordable And Available To Every Single American,' As Promised." "Furthermore, the law falls short of making health care 'affordable and available to every single American,' as promised. The law provides subsidies to help some Americans buy insurance, expands Medicaid and doesn't allow insurance companies to exclude persons with preexisting conditions. But still, the director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected 23 million persons will remain uninsured -- some because they can't afford coverage." (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
FactCheck.org: The White House Ad Promising Medicare "Benefits Will Remain The Same" Is False. "Currently, about 1 in every 4 Medicare beneficiary is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. For many of them, the words in this ad ring hollow, and the promise that 'benefits will remain the same' is just as fictional as the town of Mayberry was when Griffith played the local sheriff." (Brooks Jackson, "Mayberry Misleads On Medicare," FactCheck.org, 7/31/10)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Not Every Single American" Has Health Coverage As Obama Promised. "No matter what one thinks of Obama's health care law, it was certainly a signature legislative achievement--the most sweeping health care law since the creation of Medicare. But notice that Obama said he would bring health care to 'every single American,' but the headline simply says 'more than 30 million Americans.' That translates into 95 percent of non elderly Americans--when the law is fully implemented in 2016. That is certainly an increase over the 82-percent level that would have been expected in the absence of the law, but it is not 'every single American.'" (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
A Survey Found That Only 60 Percent Of Employers Offered Medical Coverage This Year, A 9 Percent Decrease From 2010. "Sixty percent of employers said they offered medical benefits this year, a decrease from 69 percent in 2010." (Jeffrey Young, "Health-Benefit Costs Rise Most In Six Years," Bloomberg, 9/27/11)
GREEN JOBS
"The Obama Administration Has Managed The Nearly Impossible Feat Of Turning Energy Policy Into A Money Loser, Pouring Taxpayer Dollars Into Green-Energy Busts Like Solyndra."(Editorial, "The Non-Green Job Boom," The Wall Street Journal, 11/28/11)
Obama Predicted His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million Jobs
PROMISE: In 2008, Then-Senator Obama Claimed His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million New Jobs. OBAMA: "And I'll invest $150 billion over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power, and solar power, and the next generation of biofuels -- an investment that will lead to new industries and 5 million new jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced."(Sen. Barack Obama, Acceptance Speech Remarks At The Democratic National Convention, Denver, CO, 8/28/08)
FAILURE: The Failure Of Obama's Green Jobs Programs "Gets More Embarrassing By The Day." "The green jobs subsidy story gets more embarrassing by the day. Three years ago President Obama promised that by the end of the decade America would have five million green jobs, but so far some $90 billion in government spending has delivered very few." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
"The Green Economy Is Not Proving To Be The Job-Creation Engine That Many Politicians Envisioned." "In the Bay Area as in much of the country, the green economy is not proving to be the job-creation engine that many politicians envisioned. President Obama once pledged to create five million green jobs over 10 years. Gov. Jerry Brown promised 500,000 clean-technology jobs statewide by the end of the decade. But the results so far suggest such numbers are a pipe dream." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
Green Technology Jobs Account For Just 2 Percent Of Employment Nationwide. "A study released in July by the non-partisan Brookings Institution found clean-technology jobs accounted for just 2 percent of employment nationwide and only slightly more -- 2.2 percent -- in Silicon Valley. Rather than adding jobs, the study found, the sector actually lost 492 positions from 2003 to 2010 in the South Bay, where the unemployment rate in June was 10.5 percent." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
"Federal And State Efforts To Stimulate Creation Of Green Jobs Have Largely Failed." "Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed, government records show. Two years after it was awarded $186 million in federal stimulus money to weatherize drafty homes, California has spent only a little over half that sum and has so far created the equivalent of just 538 full-time jobs in the last quarter, according to the State Department of Community Services and Development." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
The Energy Department Has Handed Out $35.2 Billion From The Stimulus, But The Clean Energy Industry Has "Yet To Provide The Boost Many Had Hoped For." "The Energy Department handed out $35.2 billion from the Recovery Act for energy efficiency and other initiatives. At the time, clean energy was seen as a potentially powerful industry for job creation. But the industry has yet to provide the boost many had hoped for." (Vauhini Vara, "Red Flags For Green Energy," The Wall Street Journal, 10/12/11)
Despite Soaring Promises From Obama And His Allies, Green Energy Has Barely Taken Flight And Has Failed To Create Jobs. "New clean-energy sources could address environmental, economic and national security problems all at once. In his 2008 convention speech, Barack Obama promised to create five million green economy jobs. The U.S. Conference of Mayors estimated in April 2009 that green jobs could account for 10 percent of new job growth over the next 30 years. Alas, it was not to be." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
"There's A Wealth Of Other Evidence To Suggest That The Green Economy Will Not Be A Short-Term Jobs Machine. According To Investor's Business Daily, Executives At Johnson Controls Turned $300 Million In Green Technology Grants Into 150 Jobs -- That's $2 Million Per Job." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
The Energy Department's Loan Program Has Fallen Far Short Of The 65,000 Jobs That It Said It Would Create
"In The Understatement Of The Year, The IG Says The Program Failed To 'Assist Those Most Impacted By The Recession." "A new report by the Labor Department's Office of Inspector General examined a $500 million grant under the stimulus program to the Employment and Training Administration to 'train and prepare individuals for careers in 'green jobs.'' So far about $162.8 million has been spent. The program was supposed to train 125,000 workers, but only 53,000 have been 'trained' so far, only 8,035 have found jobs, and only 1,033 were still in the job after six months. Overall, 'only 10% of participants entered employment.' In the understatement of the year, the IG says the program failed to 'assist those most impacted by the recession.'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
Obama's $38 Billion Green Energy Stimulus Program Only Has A Few Thousand Jobs To Show For It. "A $38.6 billion loan guarantee program that the Obama administration promised would create or save 65,000 jobs has created just a few thousand jobs two years after it began, government records show. The program -- designed to jump-start the nation's clean technology industry by giving energy companies access to low-cost, government-backed loans -- has directly created 3,545 new, permanent jobs after giving out almost half the allocated amount, according to Energy Department tallies." (Carol D. Leonnig and Steven Mufson, "Obama Green-Tech Program That Backed Solyndra Struggles To Create Jobs," The Washington Post, 9/14/11)
"The Jobs Record Is Even More Dismal When You Consider That Many Of The Jobs Classified As Green Aren't Even New Jobs, Much Less Green." "The jobs record is even more dismal when you consider that many of the jobs classified as green aren't even new jobs, much less green, according to a report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. They include positions that have been 'relabeled as green jobs by the BLS [Bureau of Labor Statistics].'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
The Cost Of Each Green Job Is $157,000. "This means that bus drivers, Environmental Protection Agency regulators, university professors teaching ecology, and even the Washington lobbyists who secure energy loan guarantees count as green employees for the purposes of government counting. The Oversight Committee finds that even a charitable assessment of the Labor program puts the cost of each green job at $157,000." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
HOME FORECLOSURES
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That His Housing Program Would Prevent 7 To 9 Million Families From Foreclosure. "And we will pursue the housing plan I'm outlining today. And through this plan, we will help between 7 and 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can afford--avoid foreclosure." (President Barack Obama, Remarks On The Home Mortgage Industry In Mesa, Arizona, 2/18/09)
FAILURE: Obama Has Only Helped 1.7 Million Avoid Foreclosure Of The 9 Million Homeowners He Promised. "President Obama pledged at the beginning of his term to boost the nation's crippled housing market and help as many as 9 million homeowners avoid losing their homes to foreclosure. Nearly three years later, it hasn't worked out. Obama has spent just $2.4 billion of the $50 billion he promised. The initiatives he announced have helped 1.7 million people." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
The Administration's Foreclosure Prevention Programs "Have Had Little Impact On The Overall Housing Sector." "The administration is already using taxpayer funds from its $700 billion bank bailout program to help prevent foreclosures and give struggling Americans a reprieve on their mortgage payments. But the programs have had little impact on the overall housing sector." ("White House Says Needs To Deal With Housing Problems," Reuters, 6/5/11)
"To Date, Administration Programs Have Permanently Reduced The Debt Of Just One Tenth Of 1 Percent Of Underwater Borrowers." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama's Housing Programs "Dramatically Underperformed"
This Summer At The White House, Obama Offered A Rare Acknowledgment That His Response To The Housing Crisis Had Fallen Short." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama Said That Housing Has Been The "Most Stubborn In Us Trying To Solve The Problem." "Asked what mistakes he had made in handling the recession and what he would do differently, he said: 'We had to revamp housing several times to try and help people stay in their homes and try to start lifting home values up. Of all the things we've done, that's probably been the area that's been most stubborn in us trying to solve the problem.'" (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
President Obama Said "I'll Be Honest With You, [Housing] Is Probably The Biggest Drag On The Economy Right Now." "'I'll be honest with you, this is probably the biggest drag on the economy right now,' Obama replied to a questioner at an economic forum in Palo Alto, Calif., who lamented that the 'housing crisis will not go away.'" (Abby Phillip, "Housing Crisis Back On President Obama's Agenda," Politico, 7/11/11)
Treasury Secretary Geithner: "But Our Programs Have Dramatically Underperformed What We Thought. ... We Are Very Disappointed And Frustrated By It And We Have A Lot Of Challenges Ahead." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Testimony Before The House Financial Services Committee, Washington, D.C., 10/6/11)
DEFICIT SPENDING
Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit In Half, But Has Failed To Even Present A Plan That Would Bring The Deficit To Those Levels
PROMISE: Obama Pledged To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. OBAMA:"And that's why today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office." (President Barack Obama, Remarks At The Fiscal Responsibility Summit, Washington, D.C., 2/23/09)
"President Barack Obama Plans To Cut The U.S. Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By The End Of His First Term ..." (Hans Nichols, "Obama Plans To Reduce Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By 2013," Bloomberg, 2/21/09)
One White House Official Told Politico "We'll Cut It At Least In Half." "Under White House projections, this year's inherited budget deficit of $1.3 trillion will be cut to $533 billion by fiscal year 2013, the end of the first term. 'So we'll cut it at least in half,' the official said." (Mike Allen, "Obama Vows To Cut Huge Deficit In Half," Politico, 2/22/09)
FAILURE: Even If Every Part Of Obama's Deficit Reduction Proposal Was Enacted, The Deficit At The End Of His First Term Would Still Be $1.33 Trillion, Over Double What He Promised. ("The President's Plan For Economic Growth And Deficit Reduction; Table S-3," Office Of Management And Budget, 9/19/11)
Politifact: "Obama Made A Pledge To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. And He's Falling Short So Far." (Gregory Trotter, "Tim Pawlenty Says President Obama Is Going To Break Promise On Deficit And Will Double It," Politifact, 6/10/11)
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner Said Even If Congress Enacted The President's Budget "We Would Still Be Left With A Very Large Interest Burden And Unsustainable Obligations Over Time." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Remarks Before Senate Budget Committee, Washington, D.C., 2/17/11)
In Doing So The "Undisputed Debt King" Has Put The Economy At Risk
At $15.22 Trillion, The National Debt Has Officially Surpassed 100 Percent Of GDP. (Treasury Direct, Accessed 1/3/12; Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
The Nation's GDP Is $15.18 Trillion. (Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
Politifact: "Obama Is The Undisputed Debt King Of The Last Five Presidents." "So by this measurement -- potentially a more important one -- Obama is the undisputed debt king of the last five presidents, rather than the guy who added a piddling amount to the debt, as Pelosi's chart suggested." ("Nancy Pelosi Posts Questionable Chart On Debt Accumulation By Barack Obama, Predecessors," Politifact, 5/19/11)
"By The Time The Next Election Rolls Around, The Government Will Have Taken On Almost $7 Trillion In Debt Under Obama. It's Hard To Explain Away A Number So Big." "For that reason alone, it is unimaginable that debt doesn't become an even bigger issue in the presidential election. The size-of-government spat is a hard one for the president to win. By the time the next election rolls around, the government will have taken on almost $7 trillion in debt under Obama. It's hard to explain away a number so big." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
By The Next Election Obama Will Have Added "$22,500 In New Debt For Every Man, Woman And Child In The Nation." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
The Government Is In A Debt Trap That Could Be Fueling The Recession. "Our recession may be driven, at this point, by the balance sheet of the government. Repairing that balance sheet by lowering spending may be the only way out of the debt trap. Call it the New Paradox of Thrift: the government can stimulate growth only by refusing to borrow. We need thrift all the way down." (John Carney, "From Jackson Hole: A Defense Of The Debt Ceiling," CNBC, 8/29/11)
CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf: Growing Debt Increases Risk Of "Sudden Fiscal Crisis." "Growing debt also would increase the probability of a sudden fiscal crisis, during which investors would lose confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget and the government would thereby lose its ability to borrow at affordable rates." (Douglas Elmendorf, "CBO's 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook," Congressional Budget Office "Director's Blog", 6/22/11)
Support The RNC
THE STIMULUS
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Keep Unemployment Below 8 Percent As Obama Promised
Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Failed To Keep The Unemployment Rate Below The 8 Percent And Is Nowhere Close To The 6 Percent They Predicted It Would Be At By Now. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12; Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09; Congressional Budget Office, 5/25/11)
Instead, Since The Stimulus Was Passed, The Unemployment Rate Has Increased From 8.2 Percent To 8.5 Percent And Has Remained Above 8 Percent For A Post-WWII Record 35 Straight Months. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Unemployment Rate Peaked At 10.1 Percent In October 2009. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Create The Over 3.5 Million Jobs That His Advisors Predicted It Would Create
PROMISE: Obama's Advisors Predicted That The Stimulus Would Create Over 3.5 Million Jobs And Raise Payroll Employment To Over 137.5 Million By The Fourth Quarter Of 2010. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09)
FAILURE: Since President Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Passed, The Nation Has Lost 1.1 Million Jobs. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
At The End Of 2010, Payroll Employment Was Only 130.3 Million. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Washington Post's Fact Checker: "Obama Is On Track To Have The Worst Jobs Record Of Any President In The Modern Era." "Unless the economy turns around in the next 18 months, Obama is on track to have the worst jobs record of any president in the modern era. That would be an accurate statement." (Glenn Kessler, "Rick Perry's Claim That Obama Has 'Killed More Jobs' Than Any Other President," The Washington Post's "The Fact Checker", 8/22/11)
OBAMACARE
On CBS' "60 Minutes", Obama Called His Health Care Package One Of His Major Accomplishments
CBS' Steve Kroft: "Why do you think you deserve to be reelected? What have you accomplished?"
President Obama: "Not only saving this country from a great depression, not only saving the auto industry, but putting in place a system in which we're going to start lowering health care costs and you're never going to go bankrupt because you get sick or somebody in your family gets sick." (CBS' "60 Minutes," 12/11/11)
Yet ObamaCare Has Failed To Make Health Insurance More Affordable
PROMISE: Obama Promised His Plan "Would Save The Average Family $2,500 On Their Premiums." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks Of Senator Barack Obama's Plan To Fight For Working Families And Take On Special Interests In Washington, Indianapolis, IN, 6/20/08)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare Is Actually Making Health Care "Less Affordable." "At the moment, the new law is making health care slightly less affordable. Independent health care experts say the law has caused some insurance premiums to rise. As we wrote in October, the new law has caused about a 1 percent to 3 percent increase in health insurance premiums for employer-sponsored family plans because of requirements for increased benefits. Last year's premium increases cast even more doubt on another promise the president has made -- that the health care law would 'lower premiums by up to $2,500 for a typical family per year.'" (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Moreover, at this point it is debatable whether the law has made health care more affordable. Insurance premiums have gone up, in part because of new benefits mandated by the law." (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
"The Cost Of Health Insurance Skyrocketed In 2011 After Several Years Of Relatively Small Increases." (Jane M. Von Bergen, "Health Insurance Costs Skyrocketing," The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9/27/11)
Workers Paid An Average Of $132 More For Family Coverage This Year. "Although premiums rose, employers kept the percentage of the premium workers pay about the same: An average of 18 percent for single coverage and 28 percent for family plans. Still, with rising costs, workers paid more, up an average of $132 a year for family coverage. Since 1999, the dollar amount workers contribute toward premiums nationally has grown 168 percent, while their wages have grown by 50 percent, according to the survey." (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
Cost Of Single Employee Coverage Grew 8 Percent According To The Survey. "Family plan premiums hit $15,073 on average, while coverage for single employees grew 8 percent to $5,429, according to a survey released Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust. (KHN is an editorially-independent program of the foundation.)" (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
And Americans Are Losing Their Coverage
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That "If You Like Your Health Care Plan, You Will Be Able To Keep Your Health Care Plan. Period." OBAMA: "So let me begin by saying this: I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage - they like their plan and they value their relationship with their doctor. And that means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what. My view is that health care reform should be guided by a simple principle: fix what's broken and build on what works." (President Barack Obama, Address To The American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 6/15/09)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare "Falls Short Of Making Health Care 'Affordable And Available To Every Single American,' As Promised." "Furthermore, the law falls short of making health care 'affordable and available to every single American,' as promised. The law provides subsidies to help some Americans buy insurance, expands Medicaid and doesn't allow insurance companies to exclude persons with preexisting conditions. But still, the director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected 23 million persons will remain uninsured -- some because they can't afford coverage." (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
FactCheck.org: The White House Ad Promising Medicare "Benefits Will Remain The Same" Is False. "Currently, about 1 in every 4 Medicare beneficiary is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. For many of them, the words in this ad ring hollow, and the promise that 'benefits will remain the same' is just as fictional as the town of Mayberry was when Griffith played the local sheriff." (Brooks Jackson, "Mayberry Misleads On Medicare," FactCheck.org, 7/31/10)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Not Every Single American" Has Health Coverage As Obama Promised. "No matter what one thinks of Obama's health care law, it was certainly a signature legislative achievement--the most sweeping health care law since the creation of Medicare. But notice that Obama said he would bring health care to 'every single American,' but the headline simply says 'more than 30 million Americans.' That translates into 95 percent of non elderly Americans--when the law is fully implemented in 2016. That is certainly an increase over the 82-percent level that would have been expected in the absence of the law, but it is not 'every single American.'" (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
A Survey Found That Only 60 Percent Of Employers Offered Medical Coverage This Year, A 9 Percent Decrease From 2010. "Sixty percent of employers said they offered medical benefits this year, a decrease from 69 percent in 2010." (Jeffrey Young, "Health-Benefit Costs Rise Most In Six Years," Bloomberg, 9/27/11)
GREEN JOBS
"The Obama Administration Has Managed The Nearly Impossible Feat Of Turning Energy Policy Into A Money Loser, Pouring Taxpayer Dollars Into Green-Energy Busts Like Solyndra."(Editorial, "The Non-Green Job Boom," The Wall Street Journal, 11/28/11)
Obama Predicted His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million Jobs
PROMISE: In 2008, Then-Senator Obama Claimed His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million New Jobs. OBAMA: "And I'll invest $150 billion over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power, and solar power, and the next generation of biofuels -- an investment that will lead to new industries and 5 million new jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced."(Sen. Barack Obama, Acceptance Speech Remarks At The Democratic National Convention, Denver, CO, 8/28/08)
FAILURE: The Failure Of Obama's Green Jobs Programs "Gets More Embarrassing By The Day." "The green jobs subsidy story gets more embarrassing by the day. Three years ago President Obama promised that by the end of the decade America would have five million green jobs, but so far some $90 billion in government spending has delivered very few." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
"The Green Economy Is Not Proving To Be The Job-Creation Engine That Many Politicians Envisioned." "In the Bay Area as in much of the country, the green economy is not proving to be the job-creation engine that many politicians envisioned. President Obama once pledged to create five million green jobs over 10 years. Gov. Jerry Brown promised 500,000 clean-technology jobs statewide by the end of the decade. But the results so far suggest such numbers are a pipe dream." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
Green Technology Jobs Account For Just 2 Percent Of Employment Nationwide. "A study released in July by the non-partisan Brookings Institution found clean-technology jobs accounted for just 2 percent of employment nationwide and only slightly more -- 2.2 percent -- in Silicon Valley. Rather than adding jobs, the study found, the sector actually lost 492 positions from 2003 to 2010 in the South Bay, where the unemployment rate in June was 10.5 percent." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
"Federal And State Efforts To Stimulate Creation Of Green Jobs Have Largely Failed." "Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed, government records show. Two years after it was awarded $186 million in federal stimulus money to weatherize drafty homes, California has spent only a little over half that sum and has so far created the equivalent of just 538 full-time jobs in the last quarter, according to the State Department of Community Services and Development." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
The Energy Department Has Handed Out $35.2 Billion From The Stimulus, But The Clean Energy Industry Has "Yet To Provide The Boost Many Had Hoped For." "The Energy Department handed out $35.2 billion from the Recovery Act for energy efficiency and other initiatives. At the time, clean energy was seen as a potentially powerful industry for job creation. But the industry has yet to provide the boost many had hoped for." (Vauhini Vara, "Red Flags For Green Energy," The Wall Street Journal, 10/12/11)
Despite Soaring Promises From Obama And His Allies, Green Energy Has Barely Taken Flight And Has Failed To Create Jobs. "New clean-energy sources could address environmental, economic and national security problems all at once. In his 2008 convention speech, Barack Obama promised to create five million green economy jobs. The U.S. Conference of Mayors estimated in April 2009 that green jobs could account for 10 percent of new job growth over the next 30 years. Alas, it was not to be." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
"There's A Wealth Of Other Evidence To Suggest That The Green Economy Will Not Be A Short-Term Jobs Machine. According To Investor's Business Daily, Executives At Johnson Controls Turned $300 Million In Green Technology Grants Into 150 Jobs -- That's $2 Million Per Job." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
The Energy Department's Loan Program Has Fallen Far Short Of The 65,000 Jobs That It Said It Would Create
"In The Understatement Of The Year, The IG Says The Program Failed To 'Assist Those Most Impacted By The Recession." "A new report by the Labor Department's Office of Inspector General examined a $500 million grant under the stimulus program to the Employment and Training Administration to 'train and prepare individuals for careers in 'green jobs.'' So far about $162.8 million has been spent. The program was supposed to train 125,000 workers, but only 53,000 have been 'trained' so far, only 8,035 have found jobs, and only 1,033 were still in the job after six months. Overall, 'only 10% of participants entered employment.' In the understatement of the year, the IG says the program failed to 'assist those most impacted by the recession.'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
Obama's $38 Billion Green Energy Stimulus Program Only Has A Few Thousand Jobs To Show For It. "A $38.6 billion loan guarantee program that the Obama administration promised would create or save 65,000 jobs has created just a few thousand jobs two years after it began, government records show. The program -- designed to jump-start the nation's clean technology industry by giving energy companies access to low-cost, government-backed loans -- has directly created 3,545 new, permanent jobs after giving out almost half the allocated amount, according to Energy Department tallies." (Carol D. Leonnig and Steven Mufson, "Obama Green-Tech Program That Backed Solyndra Struggles To Create Jobs," The Washington Post, 9/14/11)
"The Jobs Record Is Even More Dismal When You Consider That Many Of The Jobs Classified As Green Aren't Even New Jobs, Much Less Green." "The jobs record is even more dismal when you consider that many of the jobs classified as green aren't even new jobs, much less green, according to a report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. They include positions that have been 'relabeled as green jobs by the BLS [Bureau of Labor Statistics].'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
The Cost Of Each Green Job Is $157,000. "This means that bus drivers, Environmental Protection Agency regulators, university professors teaching ecology, and even the Washington lobbyists who secure energy loan guarantees count as green employees for the purposes of government counting. The Oversight Committee finds that even a charitable assessment of the Labor program puts the cost of each green job at $157,000." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
HOME FORECLOSURES
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That His Housing Program Would Prevent 7 To 9 Million Families From Foreclosure. "And we will pursue the housing plan I'm outlining today. And through this plan, we will help between 7 and 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can afford--avoid foreclosure." (President Barack Obama, Remarks On The Home Mortgage Industry In Mesa, Arizona, 2/18/09)
FAILURE: Obama Has Only Helped 1.7 Million Avoid Foreclosure Of The 9 Million Homeowners He Promised. "President Obama pledged at the beginning of his term to boost the nation's crippled housing market and help as many as 9 million homeowners avoid losing their homes to foreclosure. Nearly three years later, it hasn't worked out. Obama has spent just $2.4 billion of the $50 billion he promised. The initiatives he announced have helped 1.7 million people." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
The Administration's Foreclosure Prevention Programs "Have Had Little Impact On The Overall Housing Sector." "The administration is already using taxpayer funds from its $700 billion bank bailout program to help prevent foreclosures and give struggling Americans a reprieve on their mortgage payments. But the programs have had little impact on the overall housing sector." ("White House Says Needs To Deal With Housing Problems," Reuters, 6/5/11)
"To Date, Administration Programs Have Permanently Reduced The Debt Of Just One Tenth Of 1 Percent Of Underwater Borrowers." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama's Housing Programs "Dramatically Underperformed"
This Summer At The White House, Obama Offered A Rare Acknowledgment That His Response To The Housing Crisis Had Fallen Short." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama Said That Housing Has Been The "Most Stubborn In Us Trying To Solve The Problem." "Asked what mistakes he had made in handling the recession and what he would do differently, he said: 'We had to revamp housing several times to try and help people stay in their homes and try to start lifting home values up. Of all the things we've done, that's probably been the area that's been most stubborn in us trying to solve the problem.'" (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
President Obama Said "I'll Be Honest With You, [Housing] Is Probably The Biggest Drag On The Economy Right Now." "'I'll be honest with you, this is probably the biggest drag on the economy right now,' Obama replied to a questioner at an economic forum in Palo Alto, Calif., who lamented that the 'housing crisis will not go away.'" (Abby Phillip, "Housing Crisis Back On President Obama's Agenda," Politico, 7/11/11)
Treasury Secretary Geithner: "But Our Programs Have Dramatically Underperformed What We Thought. ... We Are Very Disappointed And Frustrated By It And We Have A Lot Of Challenges Ahead." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Testimony Before The House Financial Services Committee, Washington, D.C., 10/6/11)
DEFICIT SPENDING
Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit In Half, But Has Failed To Even Present A Plan That Would Bring The Deficit To Those Levels
PROMISE: Obama Pledged To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. OBAMA:"And that's why today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office." (President Barack Obama, Remarks At The Fiscal Responsibility Summit, Washington, D.C., 2/23/09)
"President Barack Obama Plans To Cut The U.S. Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By The End Of His First Term ..." (Hans Nichols, "Obama Plans To Reduce Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By 2013," Bloomberg, 2/21/09)
One White House Official Told Politico "We'll Cut It At Least In Half." "Under White House projections, this year's inherited budget deficit of $1.3 trillion will be cut to $533 billion by fiscal year 2013, the end of the first term. 'So we'll cut it at least in half,' the official said." (Mike Allen, "Obama Vows To Cut Huge Deficit In Half," Politico, 2/22/09)
FAILURE: Even If Every Part Of Obama's Deficit Reduction Proposal Was Enacted, The Deficit At The End Of His First Term Would Still Be $1.33 Trillion, Over Double What He Promised. ("The President's Plan For Economic Growth And Deficit Reduction; Table S-3," Office Of Management And Budget, 9/19/11)
Politifact: "Obama Made A Pledge To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. And He's Falling Short So Far." (Gregory Trotter, "Tim Pawlenty Says President Obama Is Going To Break Promise On Deficit And Will Double It," Politifact, 6/10/11)
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner Said Even If Congress Enacted The President's Budget "We Would Still Be Left With A Very Large Interest Burden And Unsustainable Obligations Over Time." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Remarks Before Senate Budget Committee, Washington, D.C., 2/17/11)
In Doing So The "Undisputed Debt King" Has Put The Economy At Risk
At $15.22 Trillion, The National Debt Has Officially Surpassed 100 Percent Of GDP. (Treasury Direct, Accessed 1/3/12; Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
The Nation's GDP Is $15.18 Trillion. (Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
Politifact: "Obama Is The Undisputed Debt King Of The Last Five Presidents." "So by this measurement -- potentially a more important one -- Obama is the undisputed debt king of the last five presidents, rather than the guy who added a piddling amount to the debt, as Pelosi's chart suggested." ("Nancy Pelosi Posts Questionable Chart On Debt Accumulation By Barack Obama, Predecessors," Politifact, 5/19/11)
"By The Time The Next Election Rolls Around, The Government Will Have Taken On Almost $7 Trillion In Debt Under Obama. It's Hard To Explain Away A Number So Big." "For that reason alone, it is unimaginable that debt doesn't become an even bigger issue in the presidential election. The size-of-government spat is a hard one for the president to win. By the time the next election rolls around, the government will have taken on almost $7 trillion in debt under Obama. It's hard to explain away a number so big." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
By The Next Election Obama Will Have Added "$22,500 In New Debt For Every Man, Woman And Child In The Nation." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
The Government Is In A Debt Trap That Could Be Fueling The Recession. "Our recession may be driven, at this point, by the balance sheet of the government. Repairing that balance sheet by lowering spending may be the only way out of the debt trap. Call it the New Paradox of Thrift: the government can stimulate growth only by refusing to borrow. We need thrift all the way down." (John Carney, "From Jackson Hole: A Defense Of The Debt Ceiling," CNBC, 8/29/11)
CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf: Growing Debt Increases Risk Of "Sudden Fiscal Crisis." "Growing debt also would increase the probability of a sudden fiscal crisis, during which investors would lose confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget and the government would thereby lose its ability to borrow at affordable rates." (Douglas Elmendorf, "CBO's 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook," Congressional Budget Office "Director's Blog", 6/22/11)
Support The RNC
Monday, January 2, 2012
Rick Santorum Stands Up for America
Rick Santorum takes Dick Gregory to task on Barry Soetoro's appeasement with Terrorists, Dictators and just nasty Racists. I have to give it to Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum as they are not afraid to tell the truth about Obama crushing America. Dick Gregory and the MSM (Media Supporting Marxist) should just put on their Brown Shirts and get it over with. Anyone who supports this Soetoro regime is supporting Racism. Holder, Sotomayor, Rev Wright, Clintons, Khalidi, Chavez and on and on and one.
Friday, December 30, 2011
Hillary Supports The Cult Of Marx & Saul Alinsky
Click on the Picture for an article written by MORT KUFF.
Artwork by MORT KUFF
The United Nations Small Arms Treaty, supported by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, could:
1. Forbid any transfer of gun ownership
2. Ban weapon manufacturers from selling to the public
3. Outlaw excessive weapons
4. Insist that owner information be stamped on every gun
5. Force us to hand over any banned weapons to the government
My gun - or your gun - or any patriotic American's gun - should NEVER be subject to international law. PERIOD!
Rethink your support of Hillary Clinton! She is a Junior Marx supporter, Saul Alinsky supporter and a sellout. She knew her hubby, Box Car Willie, lied on the stand and she did nothing!
Barry Obama, his wife Mooch Elle, Slick Willie Clinton and Hillary have all trashed their alleged Law Degrees!
Labels:
Defund-UN,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
fire-Wasserman-Schultz,
Hillary-supports-Marx,
Hillay-and-Saul-Alinsky,
Mort-Kuff,
Mort-Kuff-art,
seal-team-six,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Conservative Artwork by MORT KUFF
Accolades for MORT KUFF, Artist and Writer
Feel free to click on each picture for an educational, yet hilarious article written by MORT KUFF.





Click on each picture for an article written by MORT KUFF.
Labels:
barney-frank-crook,
Defund-UN,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
fire-Wasserman-Schultz,
Mort-Kuff,
Mort-Kuff-art,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Allen-West,
Support-Our-Troops,
Veterans
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Mort’s Meanderings
‘IN GOD WE TRUST’: ‘In Democrats, We Don’t’
The House of Representatives led by the Republican majority, has just passed a measure by a vote of 396-9, that reaffirms our National Motto, ‘In God We Trust’.
FYI: Here are the names of the 9 who voted against. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY); Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY); Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI); Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA); Rep. Emanuel cleaver (D-MO); Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA); Rep Hank Johnson (D-GA; Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA; Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA). Voting ‘present’: Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) and Rep. Melvin Watt (D-NC). Now we know with certainty, ‘In Whom We Cannot Trust’.
What this proves to me is that there are many seat-warmers in the Congress who raised their right hands and took the oath of office without the slightest notion of what it was they were swearing to - - nor, did they give a damn. As to having their other hands on the Bible as they swore the Oath, all of them might as well have placed their left hands on the Quoran, as did Keith Ellison. When we vote the dregs of society into office, that’s precisely what we get. We cannot reasonably expect anything more.
It has long been axiomatic in politics that a majority of the voting public holds the majority of the Congress in contempt, except for their own Congress-person whose name they recognize. Anyone in this part of South Florida who is under the delusion that Debbie Whatevah Schultz, Ted Deutch, Alcee Hastings or any of the other screwed-up leftist Representatives in our area differ in the anti-American stance than those who voted against, ‘In God We Trust’, is kidding himself. Democrats have become as a group, the personification of anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-Capitalism, anti-Christian, anti-freedom, anti-honest work-ethic, anti-Constitution, anti-U.S. history, anti-Founding Fathers, anti-U.S. Military, anti-Ten Commandments, anti-Stars & Stripes - - and just about anti-anything that made this nation ‘great’.
All of which leads me to question: Can you reason with a cockroach? Can you reason with a radical Islamist-terrorist thug who wants to decapitate you? Can you reason with a Chicago-street-trained politician? Can you reason with a Socialist, a Communist, a Marxist, a Clinton-lover or an Obama-lover? Can you reason with a left-hand twisted, college-educated looney who thinks the Government owes him/her a living plus, a new Porsche? Can you reason with someone who has grown up with their entire family on the public dole? Ergo, can you reason with a Democrat? Not very likely. And so, they all must be crushed at the polls in 2012. Or, would you prefer four more years of Obama-CAIR? HELLO?
Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011
Labels:
Defund-UN,
Democrat-Lies,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
Fire-Democrats,
fire-Wasserman-Schultz,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Racists,
Mort-Kuff,
MORTs-Meanderings,
Stop-Illegal-Immigration,
stop-sharia-law
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Christmas Shopping at Sears
Thank you to all our men and women serving & protecting our country and to all the organizations looking out for them & their families while they are away. It takes an amazingly strong person to put themselves into a situation where harm or worse could come to them. God Bless you for being that person!
Sears - Christmas Shopping this year.
I know I needed this reminder, since Sears isn't always my first choice. It's amazing when you think of how long the war has lasted and Sears hasn't withdrawn from their commitment. Could we each buy at least one thing at Sears this year?
How does Sears treat its employees who are called up for military duty? By law, they are required to hold their jobs open and available, but nothing more. Usually, people take a big pay cut and lose benefits as a result of being called up for active duty.
Sears is voluntarily paying the difference in salaries and maintaining all benefits, including medical insurance and bonus programs, for all called up reservist employees for up to two years.
I submit that Sears is an exemplary corporate citizen and should be recognized for its contribution. I suggest we all shop at Sears at least once, and be sure to find a manager to tell them why we are there so the company gets the positive reinforcement & feedback it well deserves.
Please pass this on.
I decided to check this before I sent it forward. So I sent the following e-mail to the Sears Customer Service Department:
I received this e-mail and I would like to know if it is true. If it is, the internet may have just become one very good source of advertisement for your company. I know I would go out of my way to buy products from Sears instead of another store for a like item, even if it's cheaper at that store.
This is their answer to my e-mail:
Dear Customer:
Thank you for contacting Sears. The information is factual. We appreciate your positive feedback.
Sears regards service to our country as one of greatest sacrifices our young men and women can make. We are happy to do our part to lessen the burden they bear at this time.
Bill Thorn
Sears Customer Care
webcenter@sears.com
Please pass this on to all your friends. Sears needs to be recognized for this outstanding contribution and we need to show them as Americans, we do appreciate what they are doing for our military!
We support Seal Team Six NOT BHO!
Sears - Christmas Shopping this year.
I know I needed this reminder, since Sears isn't always my first choice. It's amazing when you think of how long the war has lasted and Sears hasn't withdrawn from their commitment. Could we each buy at least one thing at Sears this year?
How does Sears treat its employees who are called up for military duty? By law, they are required to hold their jobs open and available, but nothing more. Usually, people take a big pay cut and lose benefits as a result of being called up for active duty.
Sears is voluntarily paying the difference in salaries and maintaining all benefits, including medical insurance and bonus programs, for all called up reservist employees for up to two years.
I submit that Sears is an exemplary corporate citizen and should be recognized for its contribution. I suggest we all shop at Sears at least once, and be sure to find a manager to tell them why we are there so the company gets the positive reinforcement & feedback it well deserves.
Please pass this on.
I decided to check this before I sent it forward. So I sent the following e-mail to the Sears Customer Service Department:
I received this e-mail and I would like to know if it is true. If it is, the internet may have just become one very good source of advertisement for your company. I know I would go out of my way to buy products from Sears instead of another store for a like item, even if it's cheaper at that store.
This is their answer to my e-mail:
Dear Customer:
Thank you for contacting Sears. The information is factual. We appreciate your positive feedback.
Sears regards service to our country as one of greatest sacrifices our young men and women can make. We are happy to do our part to lessen the burden they bear at this time.
Bill Thorn
Sears Customer Care
webcenter@sears.com
Please pass this on to all your friends. Sears needs to be recognized for this outstanding contribution and we need to show them as Americans, we do appreciate what they are doing for our military!
We support Seal Team Six NOT BHO!
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
STIMULUS CHECK
Sometime this year, we taxpayers will again may receive another 'Economic Stimulus' payment.
This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it by using a Q & A format:
Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.
Q.. Where will the government get this money?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is giving me back my own money?
A. Only a smidgen of it.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment?
A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China?
A. Shut up.
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S. economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:
* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money will go to China or Sri Lanka.
* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs.
* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or China .
* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala.
* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.
* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.
* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.
Instead, keep the money in America by:
1) Spending it at yard sales, or
2) Going to ball games, or
3) Spending it on prostitutes, or
4) Beer or
5) Tattoos.
(These are the only American businesses still operating in the U.S.)
Conclusion:
Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at a yard sale and drink beer all day!
No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help
Hat Tip to George Giftos writer of Faulty Material

This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it by using a Q & A format:
Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.
Q.. Where will the government get this money?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is giving me back my own money?
A. Only a smidgen of it.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment?
A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China?
A. Shut up.
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S. economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:
* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money will go to China or Sri Lanka.
* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs.
* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India, Taiwan or China .
* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala.
* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea.
* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan.
* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.
Instead, keep the money in America by:
1) Spending it at yard sales, or
2) Going to ball games, or
3) Spending it on prostitutes, or
4) Beer or
5) Tattoos.
(These are the only American businesses still operating in the U.S.)
Conclusion:
Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at a yard sale and drink beer all day!
No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help
Hat Tip to George Giftos writer of Faulty Material

Sunday, November 6, 2011
Faulty Material
President Obama decided to cease operations in Iraq by the end
of the year even though our mission has not been completed there.
He added, "it will enable us to build up our country again", not
acknowledging his responsibility for having torn it down in the first
place, by his inept policies for which he blames others for.
Negative statistics have increased significantly since his tenure,
and positive progress has become stagnant or diminishing under
his administration's Chicago style political guidance; not Iraq,
not Afghanistan, not Bush!
Another four years of him will get us to a point of no return and
a hole we will never be able to dig ourselves out of.
Idiots voted him into office, and you know the old saying,
"Birds of a Feather Flock Together," because they understand
him and he speaks their language.
From the beginning his plan for our country has always been to
tear America down so that he can rebuild it with his own ideological
lumber and bricks; but it turns out the material and construction
methods he wants to incorporate are inferior and unreliable.
Europe's socialist nations, primarily Greece, are structured with the
same philosophical material and they are crumbling under economic
stress. We borrowed the theme of democracy from Greece. Let us not
borrow its destructive ways.
By abandoning Iraq now, we will be leaving an ember waiting to ignite
into a much larger problem to cope with in the future.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
of the year even though our mission has not been completed there.
He added, "it will enable us to build up our country again", not
acknowledging his responsibility for having torn it down in the first
place, by his inept policies for which he blames others for.
Negative statistics have increased significantly since his tenure,
and positive progress has become stagnant or diminishing under
his administration's Chicago style political guidance; not Iraq,
not Afghanistan, not Bush!
Another four years of him will get us to a point of no return and
a hole we will never be able to dig ourselves out of.
Idiots voted him into office, and you know the old saying,
"Birds of a Feather Flock Together," because they understand
him and he speaks their language.
From the beginning his plan for our country has always been to
tear America down so that he can rebuild it with his own ideological
lumber and bricks; but it turns out the material and construction
methods he wants to incorporate are inferior and unreliable.
Europe's socialist nations, primarily Greece, are structured with the
same philosophical material and they are crumbling under economic
stress. We borrowed the theme of democracy from Greece. Let us not
borrow its destructive ways.
By abandoning Iraq now, we will be leaving an ember waiting to ignite
into a much larger problem to cope with in the future.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Labels:
barney-frank-crook,
chris-dodd-crook,
Defund-UN,
Fire-Barry-Soetoro,
George-Giftos,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Marxist-media,
MSM-Frauds
Friday, November 4, 2011
Democrat Party Crushes America
January 3, 2007---Time for a reminder.
Don’t just skim over this, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out.
The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember the day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress
So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving.
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress
since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 &2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: (below)
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
Democrats Brought About the Financial Crisis
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for
and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.
There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!
Hat Tip to George Giftos
Don’t just skim over this, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out.
The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember the day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress
So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving.
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress
since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 &2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: (below)
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
Democrats Brought About the Financial Crisis
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for
and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.
There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!
Hat Tip to George Giftos
Labels:
barney-frank-crook,
chris-dodd-crook,
Defund-UN,
George-Giftos,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Marxist-media,
MSM-Frauds,
Planned-Parenthood-Fraud,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
Stop-Terrorists
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Worm Brains in Washington
Government does not earn money; Government takes money.
Government creates jobs; jobs in the public sector. Government
hires employees for these jobs with no money to pay them,
because the Government does not create income so they have to
borrow money to pay them. In order to repay the loan they take
money from those who create income and if it isn't enough, they
print more money.
If public services are needed and requested by the private sector,
the money is provided by them with no arm twisting. Public service
unions have over blown compensation where it is now not capable
for the earners to continue to support them.
Printing new money without backing reduces its value. Obama's
worm brains advising him on economics, are creating a double
whammy malady where the price of goods costs more and the
money you have to buy it with is worth less; soon to become
one word, "worthless!"
The above statement I offer is made without benefit of an MBA,
or degree in economics from an ivy league institute. It comes from
the school of common sense.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Government creates jobs; jobs in the public sector. Government
hires employees for these jobs with no money to pay them,
because the Government does not create income so they have to
borrow money to pay them. In order to repay the loan they take
money from those who create income and if it isn't enough, they
print more money.
If public services are needed and requested by the private sector,
the money is provided by them with no arm twisting. Public service
unions have over blown compensation where it is now not capable
for the earners to continue to support them.
Printing new money without backing reduces its value. Obama's
worm brains advising him on economics, are creating a double
whammy malady where the price of goods costs more and the
money you have to buy it with is worth less; soon to become
one word, "worthless!"
The above statement I offer is made without benefit of an MBA,
or degree in economics from an ivy league institute. It comes from
the school of common sense.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Labels:
Coward-Holder,
Defund-UN,
George-Giftos,
Liberal-Frauds,
Planned-Parenthood-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
Stop-Terrorists
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Pelosi Democrats and Crony Socialism
Once again our Friends from Chuck On The Right Side responds to the Lunatic Fringe also known as the Main Stream Media. These Florida Main Stream Media types just carry water for the Hypocrites like Nazi Pelosi and cower in the corner when Barrack Hussein Obama enters the State.
Dear Professor Watson:
Cheap shot columnist, Professor Robert Watson, you are at it again. Your topic was "tax rebellion", but you had to inject your partisan political bias into your screed by claiming that Republicans are self-proclaimed "patriots" (is that cynicism, or what?) who don't want to close loopholes for millionaires and billionaires. In addition, as a pinnacle of "objective" historical thought, you had to take a few shots at the Republican candidates by not agreeing with you and your fellow lefty liberal Democrats regarding ObamaCare, immigration, or rebuilding infrastructure. What has that got to do with "tax rebellion"?
You ask what is happening that Republicans are anti-tax and anti-government, as opposed, I presume, to the Democrat mantra of tax increases, during a recession, and borrowing more money, which we can't afford, for their "crony Socialism"?
Professor Watson, why don't you go to the library to brush up on your partisan historical ignorance. It is pervasive throughout all your writings.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Dear Professor Watson:
Cheap shot columnist, Professor Robert Watson, you are at it again. Your topic was "tax rebellion", but you had to inject your partisan political bias into your screed by claiming that Republicans are self-proclaimed "patriots" (is that cynicism, or what?) who don't want to close loopholes for millionaires and billionaires. In addition, as a pinnacle of "objective" historical thought, you had to take a few shots at the Republican candidates by not agreeing with you and your fellow lefty liberal Democrats regarding ObamaCare, immigration, or rebuilding infrastructure. What has that got to do with "tax rebellion"?
You ask what is happening that Republicans are anti-tax and anti-government, as opposed, I presume, to the Democrat mantra of tax increases, during a recession, and borrowing more money, which we can't afford, for their "crony Socialism"?
Professor Watson, why don't you go to the library to brush up on your partisan historical ignorance. It is pervasive throughout all your writings.
Sincerely,
Chuck On The Right Side
Labels:
chuck-on-the-right-side,
Defund-NPR,
Defund-UN,
Dumbest-President,
Fire-Holder,
Illegal-Aliens,
Planned-Parenthood-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia-law,
Video,
Weathermen-lowlifes
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Why do the Left Wingers Hate Babies
Dear Rachel Patron:
Wrong again Rachel. That's quite a stretch to equate the fictitious figure of 15 million starving children with abortion. What has one got to do with another except as just a figment of your imagination?
Why is it that so many women past the child-bearing years, like yourself, are the most staunch supporters of abortion, like that is the most important issue in our lives? Most polls show that abortion availability is way down the list of important issues facing us a nation.
It seems like the venom regarding abortion, is coming mainly from the loony liberal left and not the anti-abortionists, as they and you claim. Maybe secularists, like yourself Rachel, should tone down your condescending rhetoric, especially in condemning people who have religious values, which you don't seem to have. Where is you tolerance for people with opposite opinions? Shame on you for your intolerance.
Sincerely,
Chuck on the Right Side

Wrong again Rachel. That's quite a stretch to equate the fictitious figure of 15 million starving children with abortion. What has one got to do with another except as just a figment of your imagination?
Why is it that so many women past the child-bearing years, like yourself, are the most staunch supporters of abortion, like that is the most important issue in our lives? Most polls show that abortion availability is way down the list of important issues facing us a nation.
It seems like the venom regarding abortion, is coming mainly from the loony liberal left and not the anti-abortionists, as they and you claim. Maybe secularists, like yourself Rachel, should tone down your condescending rhetoric, especially in condemning people who have religious values, which you don't seem to have. Where is you tolerance for people with opposite opinions? Shame on you for your intolerance.
Sincerely,
Chuck on the Right Side

Labels:
Defund-ACORN,
Defund-UN,
fire-coward-holder,
Mr-I,
Political-Correctness,
Radical-Islam,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Regime,
Stop-Marxism,
stop-sharia,
stop-sharia-law,
Support-Our-Troops
Saturday, July 2, 2011
The Demise of One Time Icons
It is quite troubling for me to understand why so many editorial
boards of leading newspapers and other journalist media outlets follow the
liberal line. It's a dangerous road to take because through history, I have
learned their influence sways disgruntled masses into mobs giving rise
to totalitarian governments that take advantage of the turmoil to make
changes detrimental to our freedoms. Using the first amendment irresponsibly
will lose it for all of us.
It doesn't take long for the press to lose independence and become a tool
of government. Maybe a few proponents of drastic liberalism might retain
their positions because they tow the line of state run media. Patsies for
tyrants.
We know who the very liberal main stream media and publications patsies
are in this country, because their views are one sided biased commentaries
that won't allow fair and balanced disagreement. I tried many times to have
my letters to the editor accepted for publication, including this one, to no avail.
My right to express freedom of speech is unacceptable, because it is contrary to
what they preach; therefore I am denied access to contrast my views against
theirs so that their readers and listeners can have a broader opinion view to
judge for themselves. An occasional conservative commentary is sometimes thrown
in to obviously quell criticism.
Publishers and producers do not realize the implication this one sided,
liberal left position can take for their very existence. They are
shooting themselves in the foot. As it is, dwindling circulations
and audiences are taking their toll on these left of center vehicles.
In a similar state is the mainstream broadcasters, CNN and MSNBC. Combined,
they do not enjoy the audience Fox News commands. What do some of these names
have in common? Leslie Marshall, Steve Murphy, Mo Elliethee, Doug Schoen, Lanny
Davis, Alan Colmes, Kristen Powers. Bob Beckel, Michael Brown, Penny Lee, Charlie
Rangel, Al Sharpton and Tamara Holder. They are just a small list of Liberal
Democrats that have appeared on Fox to defend their position. Also employed
by Fox are Juan Williams, Geraldo Rivera and Greta Van Susteren. The full
list would be impossible to fit in these pages. No member of congress is
denied access to Fox and many have taken advantage of it.
Some members of congress are fighting to pass a fairness act;
George Soros and a tax exempt organization Media Matters, funded
by him and the broadcasters mentioned above all want to destroy
Fox News for broadcasting what they choose to ignore because it
is contrary to their agendas and exposes the flaws of the
current administration.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
boards of leading newspapers and other journalist media outlets follow the
liberal line. It's a dangerous road to take because through history, I have
learned their influence sways disgruntled masses into mobs giving rise
to totalitarian governments that take advantage of the turmoil to make
changes detrimental to our freedoms. Using the first amendment irresponsibly
will lose it for all of us.
It doesn't take long for the press to lose independence and become a tool
of government. Maybe a few proponents of drastic liberalism might retain
their positions because they tow the line of state run media. Patsies for
tyrants.
We know who the very liberal main stream media and publications patsies
are in this country, because their views are one sided biased commentaries
that won't allow fair and balanced disagreement. I tried many times to have
my letters to the editor accepted for publication, including this one, to no avail.
My right to express freedom of speech is unacceptable, because it is contrary to
what they preach; therefore I am denied access to contrast my views against
theirs so that their readers and listeners can have a broader opinion view to
judge for themselves. An occasional conservative commentary is sometimes thrown
in to obviously quell criticism.
Publishers and producers do not realize the implication this one sided,
liberal left position can take for their very existence. They are
shooting themselves in the foot. As it is, dwindling circulations
and audiences are taking their toll on these left of center vehicles.
In a similar state is the mainstream broadcasters, CNN and MSNBC. Combined,
they do not enjoy the audience Fox News commands. What do some of these names
have in common? Leslie Marshall, Steve Murphy, Mo Elliethee, Doug Schoen, Lanny
Davis, Alan Colmes, Kristen Powers. Bob Beckel, Michael Brown, Penny Lee, Charlie
Rangel, Al Sharpton and Tamara Holder. They are just a small list of Liberal
Democrats that have appeared on Fox to defend their position. Also employed
by Fox are Juan Williams, Geraldo Rivera and Greta Van Susteren. The full
list would be impossible to fit in these pages. No member of congress is
denied access to Fox and many have taken advantage of it.
Some members of congress are fighting to pass a fairness act;
George Soros and a tax exempt organization Media Matters, funded
by him and the broadcasters mentioned above all want to destroy
Fox News for broadcasting what they choose to ignore because it
is contrary to their agendas and exposes the flaws of the
current administration.
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Labels:
Coward-Holder,
Defund-UN,
George-Giftos,
Global-Warming-Lies,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Marxist-media,
MSM-Frauds,
Planned-Parenthood-Fraud,
Racist-Sotomayor,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
Stop-Terrorists
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









