Sunday, January 31, 2010

No Rules for Radicals. Stop Marxism!

A great, short Video which even shows Barry Hussein Soetero's buddy, Ayers, dirty feet on our American Flag.
What a despicable group, these Radical Democrats. They Despise the Middle Class yet so many self-loathing Americans support this B. Hussein Obama and his #Thugs.

The Video is written, performed & produced by Joe Dan Gorman

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Rush Limbaugh's Letter to President Obama

RUSH rips Barry Soetero a new one with this open letter.
Will Chairman MAObama answer the letter? Don't hold your breath.
Soetero is sending us down 10 Miles of Bad Road!

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Lesson of an Affirmative Action President

This article below is by James Lewis. It is fantastic! I feel some vindication for the notice of this growing trend of Reverse Racism.
Even though Barry Soetero is just making matters worse. People like Soetero and his Thugs are just large type Hypocrites. These liberal slobs rallied for Soetero and this Judge Sotomayor. Not once did these 2 Racists ever apologize for being Racists. They just want us to accept it and move on.
These Marxist Liberal Nazis must be fired or impeached now!

This portion below is written by James Lewis
You don't pick brain surgeons by the color of their skin. You pick them by competence only. Same thing with airplane pilots. But we have allowed the profoundly irrational liberal media to persuade the American public that we are supposed to pick a U.S. president by affirmative action. Obama was elected to universal Hosannas because he is black. It wasn't a secret. That's why the Left around the world went into ecstasies when Obama ran and got elected.

We've been using affirmative action to hire and promote teachers and cops and to popularize movie stars and media heroes. We've had a generation of affirmative action agitprop, 24/7/365. Hillary Clinton was going to dictate racial and gender preferences for medical school admissions under HillaryCare. You can bet that reverse-racism is all over the 2,200 pages of ObamaCare. It's reverse-racism forever!

In America today, competence is suspect, and incompetence gets all the attention. Yet competence is what keeps us alive.

Affirmative action was allowed by the Supreme Court as a temporary exception to the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution until blacks had the same opportunities others did. It has now been about forty years, and the goal posts have just moved farther and farther Left. Today it's not just blacks -- it's women, homosexuals, and illegal aliens. And it's no longer equality of opportunity, but equality of outcome, which was the goal of Communism for seventy years in the Soviet Union, until the whole Soviet Empire crumbled as a result.

In the Soviet Union, everything was politicized. Incompetent people ran agriculture along Stalinist lines. Everything turned into a lie, and lies accelerated as they propagated through the system, in exactly the way the Climategate lies get worse and worse as they get passed along by politically correct bureaucrats and scientists. When political loyalty controls the outcomes, honesty and competence are driven out at every level of society. Nobody can point to Obama's anti-terrorist policies and say that's wildly incompetent -- without fearing they will be accused of racism.

From a temporary policy to give black people a better chance in life, we have now arrived at a Marxist goal of universal equality for everyone -- except for white, male, heterosexual, and excessively normal people. We have reversed racism, but guess what? Reverse-racism is still racism. As a direct result, corruption now pervades the big cities and Washington, D.C. That's because race, gender, and victim status have taken over as the criteria for all the benefits society has to offer.

Obama's election to the nation's most powerful office is the direct outcome of racial reasoning. It was race that put him over the top against Hillary, in a thousand media endorsements, and finally, against John McCain, who was old, male and white. Three strikes against McCain, who for all his faults is vastly more experienced and knowledgeable than the Obamessiah.

Meanwhile, blacks are still suffering from the pervasive social pathology of the inner city -- almost all self-inflicted, with the help of the welfare state. Europe shows exactly the same results, except that the victims of welfarism aren't black, but mostly white and Muslim immigrants. American blacks today are more bitter and more racially enraged than ever before, after forty years of affirmative action. Affirmative action hasn't helped women, who now have to work two jobs, one at home and one for income, especially because so many men have walked away from their families under liberal cultural values. Reverse-racism has actively hurt generations of children, who have grown up in broken homes as a direct result of pernicious social policies which Obama has actually tried to make worse. One of the first things he did was to reverse Clinton's welfare reform so that social pathology in the black community can spread its poison even wider and deeper. Obama isn't good for black people -- but then, blacks consistently vote for those who do them the most harm.

Reverse-racism has hurt Asian-Americans, who don't usually count as disadvantaged non-whites, but who by dint of talent and hard work are now among the largest ethnic groups in many colleges and universities and a majority at Berkeley and UCLA, where race engineering is banned by a California law passed by voters over the objection of the political establishment.

Any time a Muslim tries to explode a bomb on an airplane, Obama sticks his nose in the air and pretends he doesn't know what's up. But he knows, he knows. The next time an airplane blows up in flight, Obama will be history, but he will never blame himself for his own truly stupid and perverse policies. On the contrary, Obama will be around for the next forty years blaming White America for his own folly.

We've now been taught by the media to hire and elect people by the color of their skin, or by gender, or by sexual preferences -- including, in the case of Kevin Jenkins, their ability to peddle gay sexuality to kids and teachers for the Queering of the Elementary Schools.

Is it any surprise that a president who ran as the historic first black -- that is, on affirmative action grounds -- is not just incompetent, but perverse, so that we deliberately don't check the passenger lists for young Muslim males who were brought up in radicalized cultures, even if they are already in the terror database, even if they buy a one-way ticket with untraceable cash and don't check any luggage at all on their one-way flights from Nigeria to Detroit?

Obama's anti-terror policies are not just incompetent. They are suicidal.

They are exactly like all the other social policies that are supposed to help the poor, the disadvantaged, the black, females, homosexuals -- all of which invariably end up punishing and degrading the very people they are supposed to help. Who do you suppose is in the teachers' unions that are keeping black kids from escaping the inner city ghettos? Yes, it's black and liberal teachers. Who do you suppose is actively importing Muslim radicals into Europe and the United States? Who do you suppose has done more to spread HIV? Yes, it is the very Leftists who are always telling us how much compassion they feel for those very people.

The vote in 2008 was even crazier than picking your brain surgeon by the color of his skin. If the knife slips in the surgeon's hand, you might die, but the nation as a whole doesn't. But if the president has a nervous breakdown in the Oval Office, the whole world is at risk. It's a mad, mad, mad idea to elect people on the basis of race or gender.

We have been so PC-whipped as a nation that Obama's election as a black man -- not as a competent black man, not as an experienced and well-qualified black man -- was celebrated by liberals and Leftists around the world. It is the victory of brain-dead ideology over common sense. The guy in the White House today is potentially the most dangerous, mentally fixated, and irresponsible demagogue we have ever known. Those wacky ideas are once again on the rise, not just in the schools and colleges, but even at the very centers of power. The election of Obama was by far the screwiest thing American voters have ever done. It throws doubt on the whole American experiment, because we have inflicted this disaster on ourselves.

The lesson of the Obama presidency is exactly the opposite of what our stuck-on-stupid media are telling us. It is that we must never, ever hire, promote, or elect somebody to a position of power and responsibility merely because of his race. Abraham Lincoln would not have been surprised. Neither would Martin Luther King, Jr. Even the editors of the New York Times choose schools for their kids not by race, but by educational competence. Somehow the American people have forgotten their common sense while Obama was rifling their wallets.

The captain is drunk in the deckhouse, and the ship of state is heading for the rocks. Our enemies are trying to take advantage of our failure to elect even sensible leadership. If you don't think al-Qaeda, Ahmadinejad, and the Russians will try to screw us royally under this perverse and incompetent leadership, just wait a month or two. The Chinese have taken the measure of this guy. So have the other jackals prowling around the small campfire of civilization. They know he's a pushover, and they will act accordingly. The only question is how badly we'll get burned.

The Left have advocated suicidal policies, and now they have found their way to power. But ultimately this is a failure of the American people, of our pathetic excuse for a media, and of the anti-American hatred that pervades the Left.

Yes, God protects orphans, widows, and the United States. But you can rely on pure dumb luck for only a little while before the ship of state comes to grief on that unforgiving iceberg.
By James Lewis

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Glenn Beck -The Revolutionary Holocaust- Live Free.. or Die

Warning: Some of the images in this program may be disturbing to some people.
Viewer Discretion is Advised.

This is a "must watch" documentary on the Left Wing Dictators and brutal Thugs.
It is absurd that our our current Radical President had Che Guevera posters in his Campaign Booths and many of MAObama's czars are fans of MAO.
Barry Soetero has many similarities with Dictators. Soetero even supported the Honduran Thug who tried to become the Dictator.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Bookmark and Share

Obama’s Washington Corruption, Criminality and Insanity Reach New Lows

By Sher Zieve

It’s time to get the corrupt, criminal and insane factions out of government, out of office and out of our lives

The recent Senatorial election and extreme establishment upset in Massachusetts only seems to have had a marginal impact on the elitist rulers in Washington D.C. Instead of acknowledging the first election of a Republican Senator to Massachusetts’ (and this was called leftist “Sen. Ted Kennedy’s seat”) since 1972 as a demand by the people for elected officials to change their Marxist/Totalitarian course of action in the nation’s capitol, leftist Democrats are now spinning it as an election that meant “we haven’t been liberal (AKA totalitarian) enough!”

The Massachusetts’ vote was a clear referendum against ObamaCare and Obama & Co’s continuing secretive meetings to shove bribed votes and spurious legislation down the throats of We-the-People. So deciding to spin the voters’ message as ‘the people really want ObamaCare but, want the government to take it over completely’, Obama and his Dem-controlled Congress are now—yet again—talking about using their “nuclear option” to shove the Obama/Pelosi/Reid Death Plan down the throats of We-the-People.
The plan to use the previously-only-allowed-for-budgetary-proposals “reconciliation” will let the Dem-packed Senate pass the anti-healthcare bill with a simple majority, despite the will of the American people. They simply don’t care what the people have directed them to do. “Our” elected officials in D.C. are bound and determined to continue to steal from the American people so that they can increase and ensure their own ‘lifestyle levels’. It’s what totalitarian regimes ALWAYS do. They steal from the people and place their ill-gotten gains in their own fur-lined pockets. Remember, although our laws do not allow these behaviors if no one enforces them they’re non-existent.

Note: The Devil’s plan is always geared towards the ruin of others, in order to allow itself to live in luxury and totalitarian rule over the subjugated humans.
If there was ever a time to get rid of all Democrat elected officials and all RINOs in D.C., it is now. As an example of the still-growing Dem insanity and after finally having memorized his Obama talking points, in a recent interview with the BBC former Vermont Governor Howard Dean said that the Massachusetts’ election simply showed that the voters were “angry with the wealthy establishment!” Huh??? Dean also said that Democrat internal polls showed that “we weren’t liberal enough.” Double Huh??? Suffice it to say, the vote reflected just the opposite. But, perhaps Dean, Reid, Pelosi and Barack “all the bad stuff is STILL Bush’s fault” Obama will continue to believe that if they just tell the lies long enough and forcefully enough—in multiple ways—they can compel the electorate into buying into them. Hmm…it hasn’t worked so far. By the way, Obama & Co has affected and will continue to affect the same forced methods for every action these community organizers perform; legality and the will of the people be damned.

Folks, we’ve begun to do our part. We’re voting out the totalitarians. But, if not before, it has now become patently obvious that our “leaders” have turned completely and without reservation against us. They plan to rule—not govern—us for as long as they can get away with it. If we allow it, we will become even more of a Stalinistic nation.

For what Stalin really did to the Russian people—instead of the sanitized and polished spin from his supporters—read “Genocide in the 20th Century Stalin’s Forced Famine 1932-1933—7,000,000 Deaths.” The problem is that all totalitarian leaders (AKA tyrants, dictators, despots etc) exterminate those they don’t want in ‘their’ countries. Some tyrants are merely worse than others.

It’s time to get the corrupt, criminal and insane factions out of government, out of office and out of our lives. We’ll do it with our votes. And, if that doesn’t work and they still refuse to go—or find a way to bypass the people’s vote again—we must get them out in (quoting Nancy Pelosi) “anyway possible.”

Retaking our country was never intended to be easy. But, we didn’t pay enough attention to what was happening and let it slide into the mud and sludge of leftist rule. But, reacquiring the USA for We-the-People is the single most important thing we can do as citizens. May God bless and support our cause of taking back our liberties and freedoms.
By Sher Zieve

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Obama's Bank Bashing killing Wealth Creation

Barry Soetero and his gang of Thugs go after Capitalism hard. They read the Marxist handbook and know to take down the Banks and have only a few which will have Barry as CEO.
Will Juan Williams find more reason to support Soetero and blame Bush?
When can we send these Thugs packing?
Read the article below by Ron Lipsman and find out who is happy about Barry's enormous blunders.

By Ron Lipsman
There was a period about ten months ago when every time Obama opened his mouth, the stock market plunged another 100 points. At that time, the Anointed One rarely missed an opportunity to trash the insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, automobile companies and of course big banks. When he wasn't verbally accosting these industries, he was promising sweeping new legislation and regulations that would supposedly rein them in and curtail their abusive practices.
Not surprisingly, the market reacted very negatively to these threats-both to the specific prospects inherent in Obama's threats as well as to the uncertainty caused by their enunciation. Untold hundreds of millions of dollars of asset wealth were destroyed by the resultant decline in the Dow and other indices.

Since more than half of Americans are now shareholders, it is not unfair to lay the blame for a decline in the typical American taxpayer's wealth at Obama's feet. It is ironic that, last year, when too many Americans were still under the illusion that Obama's stimulus program, deficit spending and cap and trade and health care monstrosities were going to help rescue the economy (they aren't any longer), his loose tongue was already diminishing the wealth of the American people. It got so bad that even Bill Clinton had to tell him to button it.

Well, here we go again. This past week his Excellency reprised his repeated thrashing of the banking and insurance industries - with the same result on the stock market! Now, many expected that the recent market surge would yield to a correction. Leave it to our clueless President to initiate the correction and render it more severe than necessary. It's time for Bill to tell him to shut up again.

This is what we get for electing an ignorant community organizer with no expertise in running a newsstand, much less a country. Republicans might be happy that his Presidency is going up in flames, but that brings scant comfort to those whose wealth he is shrinking. As for the Democrats, if I may quote Monty Pelerin in a blog in the Jan 23 issue of this magazine: The only happy Democrat today is Jimmy Carter. He probably senses the chance to pass his heavy mantle of "worst President in my lifetime" on to "The One." By Ron Lipsman

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 23, 2010

O'Reilly on Low-Life Jennifer Lopez Calling Sarah Palin the 'B' Word

Is this RACIST for J Low Class to call Sarah Palin the "B" word?
Where are the Feminists on this issue, thought they hated Women being called the B word.
I guess it is okay to call her the B word if that Woman is a Patriotic American.

O'Reilly tells J Low Class to go back to doing what you do. What does she do, make bad movies, dance like an angry, constipated Racist?
Hey J low Class, just go away.

Bookmark and Share

Terrorist supporting Muslim professors green lighted into the USA

You can read this very informative article below By Ethek Fenig, on how Soetero & Hillary seem to throw their support to Terrorist organizations.
This of course, is another example of how Political Correctness is destroying America. The Fringe MSM will not report on this. They are afraid to offend Obama and the Terrorists yet they make movies about killing President Bush. The Radical Left is the Enemy within, that is all there is to it.

By Ethel C. Fenig
Less than a month after the suicide underwear terrorist bomber almost blew up nearly 300 people in a plane over Detroit; less than a month after all the US security agencies solemnly promised to make us terror proof by stripping travelers of their dignity the US is so blissfully safe that President Barack Obama (D) and his Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, have decided that two Muslim supporting terrorists who have funded terrorist organizations, spread hate America lies, and thus were barred from entering the country are now welcome to the US according to Larry Neumeister of the AP.

Mid East scholar Daniel Pipes rips apart and provides background on the flimsy excuses offered for allowing the Muslim terrorists, who are professors, into the US.

2) Note that this change was ordered from the very top, specifically invoking Obama.
(3) Note also the sleaziness of the State Department spokesman, ascribing Ramadan's exclusion to his "making statements counter to U.S. foreign policy." No, the reason was explicitly his having provided funds to a terrorist-related organization. Why the gratuitous lie, State Department?

(4) The Obama administration puts this case into the context of "pursuing a new relationship with Muslim communities based on mutual interest and mutual respect." But it's always been a terrorism case, with no connection to issues of Islam. What amateurs.

(5) Note the term "mutual respect," the hackneyed phrase repeatedly applied to the U.S. government and Muslims - so much so that I have devoted a whole blog to Obama's use of these words.

So, do you feel safer now?

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Massachusetts Earthquake Puts Everything in Play

As Barry Soetero explained that Scott Brown won because people are mad at George Bush, it appears Barry is very far off from reality. What a sicko! Barry is so delusional that he does not realize America has Patriots (you know the type that wants small Government, wants our Country protected. The People that Napolitano and Holder and Hussein hate) who do not want Marxism to further destroy the USA.
Democrats and RINOs beware as we want to send you packing from your cushy jobs.

Awesome article by James Simpson
Scott Brown's stunning electoral victory in Massachusetts yesterday confirms to the world what we have known all along: Patriotism and common sense are alive and well. Real Americans remain a majority in this country, and the massively-funded, corrupt Democrat machine, engorged with our tax dollars, radical billionaire money, and lock-step union support, cannot buy elections even in hardcore Democrat states once the sleeping giant has awoken.

And make no mistake about it: We are wide awake!

The Democrats were certainly hamstrung by choosing an impossibly bad candidate. Martha Coakley made a fool of herself repeatedly, yet through it all carried herself with an astonishing sense of conceited entitlement, seemingly contemptuous of even having to campaign at all. Meanwhile, her campaign took on an air of ugly thuggishness. Two scenes captured on video during this short campaign say it all. Everyone has seen the first one, where a reporter is pushed to the ground by a Coakley supporter while she does nothing to stop it. Remember, she is the Massachusetts attorney general. The second one has received less attention, but is even more telling: a female reporter getting thrown out of a Coakley campaign office with shouts of "Nazi." Someone even used the F-bomb. What class acts!

The real problem is that Coakley's campaign defines what the Democratic Party has become today: arrogant, boorish, incomprehensibly ignorant, and downright thuggish. Former Vermont governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean, for example, reacted to Brown's victory by saying that now Democrats have to get tough and not "deal with Republicans anymore." Stunning. So that's what we've been witnessing all year, with Democrats violating Senate rules, holding closed-door meetings, locking Republicans out of discussions, rejecting outright any Republican proposals, and violating their own promises of "transparency." But they haven't been tough enough. Simply amazing.

Scott Brown's election was certainly about health care. Massachusetts already has its own expensive plan. They don't need or want even more government intrusion. It was also about national security. Brown's own internal polling convinced the campaign that this was true. People feel insecure with this president and his administration, and with good reason.

But it was even more than that. People have had enough. We have had enough of baldfaced lies from Democrats. We have had enough of big spending bills being disingenuously presented as "deficit reducers." We have had enough of massive government programs guaranteed to cripple the economy and lose jobs. We have had enough of an ever more intrusive government attempting to take over every aspect of our daily lives. We have had enough of blatant corruption and the coddling of terrorists. We have had enough of radicals attempting to ram their virulently anti-American agenda down our throats and calling us "domestic terrorists" for objecting.

This election is a game-changer. Make no mistake about it. Not only is the U.S. Senate in play for Republicans in November, but so is the House of Representatives, the state legislatures, and the governors' mansions. Last night, Sarah Palin said to Greta Van Susteren on Fox News that "[w]e just witnessed a wicked political pivot ... This is a tidal wave sweeping the country." She is right.

Now, Republicans have an uncanny ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. We have seen it time and again, and that is a real danger here. So let me tell you what this victory is not. It is not about getting Republicans a seat at the Democrat table. Let me repeat that.

This election is not about getting Republicans a seat at the Democrat table.

If nothing else has become clear over the past year, Republicans have to have at least realized this: Democrats don't share. Any effort to use this victory to give Republicans a better "negotiating position" on Democrat-sponsored bills will simply make it easier for Democrats to pursue their reckless agenda, except now with "bipartisan" support. Come November, voter contempt for Republicans will be as palpable as it is now for Democrats. Republicans will lose.

Going along to get along is out. Compromise is out. And if Republicans don't get it, then they will be repeating the mistakes that put them into the minority in the first place.

The reason We the People are in open revolt is because we finally clearly recognize that the entire Democrat agenda is willfully destructive. Republicans need to get this through their heads. We are not merely dealing with a party of "opposing views." We are dealing with an international movement that will destroy our Republic by snatching our freedoms, our wealth, and our independence, with the ultimate goal of, as Barack Obama said, "fundamentally transforming" our constitutional republic into a socialist dictatorship.

Republicans have no excuse to support or even compromise with that agenda. Their job should be preventing Democrats from imposing this nation-wrecking gameplan while convincingly articulating their reasons for doing so and offering superior alternatives.

As for Martha Coakley, good riddance, and don't let the door smack you on the rear on the way out.
By James Simpson

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Massachusetts win: Obama Vows Retaliation against American People

Yes, MAObama wants to punish Americans! Soetero is fuming over the Liberal Democrats being kicked to the curb in Massachusetts last night.
How dare a Lowly, OM (Obama Motors) Truck driving, Pro-Military Guy win an election even after the Messiah came into help Croakley (Yes if Weasel Kennedy can call her Marcia, then I have every right to call her CRoakley).
A great article below from Sher Zieve of the Canada Free Press.

By Sher Zieve
First of all, on 19 January 2010 We-the-People did it! A virtually unprecedented event occurred yesterday. The almost bluest of blue states turned partially red in its senatorial election to continue the growing revolt against the totalitarian and patently Marxist/Maoists policies of the current Obama Administration in Washington D.C. The election of now-Senator Scott Brown (R-MA), the first since the reelection of Republican Senator Edward William Brooke III in 1972, was a landslide. Thank you Massachusetts and Scott Brown for a great night.

However, according to leftist leaning “news” organizations (CNN and MSNBC) covering the special election, members of the Obama Administration have said that the tyrant will NOT take this defeat lying down. The “leaked” information coming out of the White House is that Obama is now planning to (per Rachel Maddow and others) “double down” in his efforts to shove the ObamaCare Death Plan down the throats of the American people. Even Fox News’ leftist Juan Williams repeated this double-down message. Williams also said that the “majority of the American people” want health care reform. Questions: What is it about leftists that keeps them from seeing reality? Are they crazy or just hoping if the repeat their lies often enough people will actually begin to believe them? Obama appears to hope that if he keeps telling us we really want his Death Plan, we’ll buy it. After all, the constant repetition of the “big lie” worked for Adolph Hitler& Co, didn’t it?

But, tonight’s election in very liberal Massachusetts proved Obama wrong. So, he is now bent upon retaliating against the Massachusetts’ voters for not voting in an Obama and totalitarianism-supporting Democrat and against the rest of us who woke up this morning feeling just a little bit better about our country, ourselves and our future. Obama and the Marxist-Democrat-run Congress are furiously and furtively working to find another clandestine way in which to shove the Obama/Democrat Death Plan down the throats of the American people; not because it’s ’good for them even if they don’t want it’ as The ObamaTyrant suggests but, because it’s the only real and viable way that Obama and his minions can establish a truly tyrannical form of government and once and for all suppress the American people.

Obama & Co will now work even harder to destroy us and our country, folks. He is intensely angry with us for daring to vote into office someone who wants to preserve—not destroy—our worship of God, freedoms and liberties and replace them with himself. Obama is openly on the opposite aside of the American people and he will continue to fight us with his entire arsenal. To Obama, WE are the terrorists and he has told us that multiple times. The real terrorists are protected by The Obama.

Our fight to take back our country is firmly underway and—including the gubernatorial elections in both New Jersey and Virginia—we are winning. But, Obama’s “Plan B’s” include bypassing us—the electorate. He has already announced his intent to pull in the EPA to implement—via his dictatorial fiat—Cap & Tax if We-the-People balk too loudly at its congressional passage. And Obama and his adherents (Pelosi comes readily to mind) have told us that they will pass the Obama Death Plan “one way or another.” We MUST keep fighting them, with every legal means possible until these means no longer work.

Remember that the American people do NOT want the ObamaCare horror; only Obama and his Marxist-ruling class do. The bottom line is Obama and his adherents want to completely and irrevocably control the American people in everything they say and do. And We-the-People refuse to be controlled. It’s just that simple.

Let’s take a little time to enjoy our victory in Massachusetts with the “Scott heard ‘round the world.” But, then it’s on to the next battle of this—at least—2-3 more years war that ends up with the ousting of Obama, his czars and all of the rest of the anti-American and anti-human hordes. In the meantime, thanks again Massachusetts. The rest of We-the-People needed you and you came through!

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Obama ridiculed Brown riding around the state in his truck - a GM product

The Elitist Barry Soetero shows his disdain from real Americans once again. So what Scott Brown does not wear $500 sneakers like Michelle Obama or Puffy Deeddy but Scott Brown cares for America!

From Jim Hoft:
Republican Scott Brown is a regular guy who drives a truck with nearly 200,000 miles on it. He says the truck has brought him closer to the people as he's traveled around Massachusetts during the special election to replace the late Ted Kennedy in the U.S. Senate.
Today Barack Obama campaigned for Martha Coakley in Boston and bashed Scott Brown and truck owners several times during his speech. Obama told the crowd, "Anybody can own a truck."

Brown's immediate response - the sign of a well run campaign - is a classic:

Later Scott Brown responded to the president's attack.
FOX News reported:

Brown took that opportunity to slam the president on government spending..

"Mr. President, unfortunately in this economy, not everybody can buy a truck," Brown said in a statement. "My goal is to change that by cutting spending, lowering taxes and letting people keep more of their own money."

Evidently, the fact that the truck Obama was belittling Brown about is a GMC Canyon -made by a company owned by the Obama administration - went right over the president's head.

Hat Tip: Ed Lasky

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 18, 2010

Michelle Obama: Snakeskin & Skin in the Game

Most People (especially Obama drones) have a very short memory. Michelle Obama sat in that Racist Church for years also. Michelle Obama ate lunch with Farrakhan and Khalidi and hung out with Ayers and Dirtbag Dorne.
I do NOT care how dark or light she is. She is a horrible American representative.
It is tie to send the Obamas and their elitist attitude packing!
Read the very insightful post below by Jeannie DeAngelis.

Written by Jeannie DeAngelis
Based on one full year's worth of observation, it is obvious that Michelle Obama's pronouncements, advice, injunctions, and edicts include a personal exemption for the occupants of the White House Executive Residence. Michelle's attempts at verbally imparting wisdom, if matched against the backdrop of action, expose the First Lady's hypocrisy.

Take for instance Michelle's disingenuous response to reporters pertaining to the issue of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's racial comments about "light skin tone" and "Negro dialect." The First Lady said forgiveness comes easy because, "...she knows Reid so well."

Such a quick dismissal of Reid's sentiments is perplexing coming from a woman known to be intensely aware of race. The First lady's forgiving words put the spotlight on what history reveals abides in her heart. Michelle said, "My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before. ... Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second." Reporters, eager for further insight, learned that Michelle evaluates "people more so on what they do rather than the things they say." Oh really?

Michelle's statement about measuring character on what is done, rather than what is said, presents a moral dilemma for the First Lady and President Obama, both of whom never come close to exemplifying the injunctions both freely impose on everyone else.

One such glaring example was at Saddleback Church, when candidate Obama shared that "America's greatest moral failure" is not abiding by "Whatever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me." Citing America's wealth and power, Obama shared from his perspective that our nation, "still doesn't spend enough time thinking about the least of these."

If moral fiber is measured by what is done rather than what is said, then why, as an example to America, hasn't the First Lady passed on Narcisco Rodriquez and Jimmy Choo and addressed the least of Obama's half-brothers, George Hussein Onyango, who lives in a shanty on less than a dollar a month? Why hasn't she welcomed in the sister of Obama's Kenyan father Aunt Zeituni, living in wretched poverty in a Boston ghetto?

In an article following Obama's soaring inaugural address, David Broder alluded to the rhetoric-versus-deeds quandary, saying, "What speeches can accomplish, they have delivered handsomely for Barack Obama. Now, it will depend on his deeds."

The First Lady is well aware that the President stresses that Americans should surrender personal aspirations for the sake of the collective. "All Americans will have to sacrifice to put the economy back on track," Obama said. "Everybody's going to have to give...Everybody's going to have to have some skin in the game." To date, Michelle's contribution to "skin in the game" is the acquisition of an off-the-shelf, $1,900.00 snakeskin clutch.
Excusing herself, Michelle is of the opinion that "in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system ... someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."

Yet while stressing doing over saying, the First Lady seems averse to relinquish haute couture, and she freely participates in $56,000 worth of accommodations for a two-week Hawaiian vacation. Michelle lives a Robin Leach lifestyle while Americans financially struggle. Michelle boutique shops in Paris for the weekend, enjoys 250,000-dollar date nights and frivolously flies aboard Air Force One at the cost of forty to fifty thousand tax dollars per hour. If the First Lady is correct, and personal principle is exposed by deeds and not words, then she fails her own standard for the Harry Reid "skin tone" and "Negro dialect" test.

Can America ever forget newly-elected Barack Obama swearing that the "election is not about me" and then contradicting those words with actions that disregard the wishes of the majority whom the election supposedly was all about? Moreover, if humility means having a modest opinion of one's own importance, and deeds speak louder than verbal expressions of reticence, then maybe on an upcoming speaking junket, Michelle could explain to America what accepting an undeserved honor reveals about an individual?

Nevertheless, Michelle can't very well censure Barack for what she is also guilty of doing. Prior to Obama being elected, Michelle militantly spoke the words, "Barack will require [emphasis mine] his flock to work." Once in the White House, the First Lady, having no official duties per se, hired a staff of 22 assistants with combined salaries totaling $1.5 million per year to assist her every whim. Michelle's words portended imposed toil on the "flock" while harboring full intent to partake of a sumptuous, power-pampered lifestyle -- regardless of whether the rest of the nation wallowed endlessly in the throes of a Great Recession.

Michelle also said, "Barack will demand [emphasis mine] that America sheds its cynicism." Then, while volunteering at a Washington, D.C. food bank, the First Lady fed the impoverished while shod in $540 Lanvin sneakers. Over the past year, through repeated thoughtless actions, Michelle Obama has contributed greatly to Americans' pervasive distrust of each others' professed integrity and motives.

The First Lady also forewarned, "Barack will demand [emphasis mine] ... that America move out of its comfort zone." Yet if Mrs. Obama expresses a hankering for organic kale, then Washington, D.C. promptly shuts down. Three dozen vehicles set to work, police and Secret Service sweep the area, dogs sniff for bombs, barricades are erected, and fruit stands are staked out with magnetometers and rooftop binoculars. Only then, in an armored limo, can Michelle be ferried to the organic food stand to be welcomed with flower leis and cowbells by extremely uncomfortable people cordoned safely off to the side -- far from their comfort zone.

In the UCLA speech, Michelle uttered rousing words of freedom from oppression and overbearing control, claiming firsthand knowledge of the fact that Americans "are sick and tired of other people telling them how their lives will be." In spite of that, the First Lady heartily approves of dictatorial, liberty-curtailing decrees, enforced governmental management, and a presidential agenda poised to significantly impact everybody's life but her own.

The most poignant Michelle Obama declaration was this: "Barack will never allow [emphasis mine] you to go back to your lives as usual." One year later, after thousands of hours of empty, hypocritical rhetoric, Barack's "requiring," "demanding," and "never allowing" actually appear to be words he plans to back up with action. To do so, he needs Harry Reid, which is probably why the First Lady held her nose and said she absolved the contrite senator.

However, if the past is any indication of the future, then Michelle, like Barack, is first and foremost concerned with personal political expediency, power, and prestige. With that in mind, although the First Lady graciously extended public exoneration toward Harry Reid, in reality, it's highly unlikely that she ever really intended to do what was said.
By Jeannie DeAngelis

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 17, 2010

The Danger to America

“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”

Hat tip to Mr. I

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Detroit in RUINS! (Crowder goes Ghetto)

Have any questions about what our Country will look like with ongoing Politically Correct Liberals in charge? What this video and see how they destroy a vibrant City.
This is very personal to me and many people from the Detroit area.
The City of Detroit has become a crime ridden post for Thugs.

Bookmark and Share

Environmentalist Nazis are anti-human & power-hungry

The largest untapped oil reserve in the world?

North America has plenty of oil. Environmentalist Nazis say we can't have it.

The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April '08 that only scientists and oil men knew was coming. It was a revised report (hadn't been updated since '95) on how much oil was in an area of North America.

The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe Bay and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable -- at $107 a barrel -- we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5.3 trillion.

"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea ..." says Terry Johnson, the Montana Legislature's financial analyst.

"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found in the past 56 years." reports the Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the 'Bakken.' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and into Canada.

For years, U. S. oil exploration was considered a dead end. Even the "Big Oil" companies gave up searching for major oil deposits decades ago. However, a recent
technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. Because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!

That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 41 years straight.

If that didn't throw you on the floor, then this should -- because it's from over three years ago.

"U. S. Oil Discovery- Largest Reserve in the World!" Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is more than 2 TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?

They reported this stunning news: We have more oil inside our borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:

8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia

18-times as much oil as Iraq

21-times as much oil as Kuwait

22-times as much oil as Iran

500-times as much oil as Yemen

and it's all right here in the Western United States ...

How can this be? How can we not be extracting this? Because the environmentalists and others have blocked all efforts to help America become independent of foreign oil. Again, we are letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy.

James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East - more than 2 TRILLION barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today, reports The Denver Post.

This is all true. Check it out at the link below. It will blow your mind.

As usual, Radical Environmentalists and a government that's in bed with them have blocked the extraction of this oil. We are losing our country piece by piece. This is a good example of Political Correctness and Radical Marxists destroying our Country.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Martha Coakley: The Voice for Fat Cats and Corruptocrats

This Martha Coakley is just another Dirty Dog. Massachusetts People have to unite to send these Corrupt Liberals to their destined jail cell.
Remember it was Ted Kennedy's mandate that would restrict the "Common Man" from owning weapons. Meanwhile, Kennedy had vast amounts of armed guards protecting his hide.
As usual, Michelle Malkin writes a brilliant article on the Corrruptocrats.

Written by Michelle Malkin
Democrat Martha Coakley is the voice of the “little people” the way Ted Kennedy was the voice of sobriety. If Massachusetts voters want another privileged liberal who talks a good “social justice” game while ignoring public corruption, pocketing gobs of money from Beltway fat cats and pandering to corporate special interests, Coakley’s the one.

Coakley, the Bay State’s attorney general, has campaigned to replace the late Sen. Kennedy on a law-and-order platform. But she has consistently turned a blind eye to both. When a top aide to Boston Mayor Tom Menino was caught deleting thousands of e-mails in violation of public records law last fall, Coakley punted. Democrat Menino was in the middle of a re-election bid; Coakley was wrapped up in her own senatorial bid.

Instead of expressing any concern about the City Hall information black hole, Coakley refused to investigate. She accused her critics of playing politics: “(W)e get lots of complaints from folks who are adversaries who have a particular agenda.”

But who’s got the agenda? After undertaking Herculean technical efforts to recover the trashed e-mails, Boston city officials discovered e-mail fragments related to an ongoing federal probe of former state Sen. Dianne Wilkerson. Wilkerson attained national infamy as the lawmaker caught on film stuffing thousands of dollars of bribes from an FBI informant down her bra in exchange for her help securing a liquor license for a nightclub. She is currently awaiting federal trial.

Coakley cut an immunity deal with Wilkerson last year, protecting her from prosecution for campaign finance violations. But according to the Boston Herald, the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance reported last month that Wilkerson had failed to comply or only partially complied with 11 of 51 conditions. Coakley allowed Wilkerson to pay a measly $10,000 fine to avoid any legal action. She has failed to make those payments, failed to file ordered paperwork and failed to answer information requests from state campaign finance officials.

Coakley’s response? Meh. Instead, she used the power of her office to herald her new, taxpayer-funded $750,000 cybercrime lab initiative—a picture-perfect, campaign-ready moment—without an ironic pause, and has launched a crackdown on ladies’ gardening clubs for failing to file financial disclosure forms related to their dues and plant sales.

Perhaps if they were in the lingerie business, they might have gotten a pass. Or if they had volunteered for Coakley’s campaign.

While she’s a stickler with the gardeners, Coakley has been mighty sloppy practicing what she selectively enforces. She has siphoned $25,000 out of her state campaign fund for a poll on her federal Senate bid; used another $24,000 from her state account to pay Beltway political consultants advising her on the Senate campaign; and reportedly used a secret asset sale pact between her state and federal campaign committees to use state campaign funds to purchase a fundraising database, redesign her website and obtain $6,000 worth of campaign paraphernalia with her Senate logo.

Then there’s Coakley’s relationship with Massachusetts’ corrupt former House Speaker Sal DiMasi. Bay State records show that Coakley sent annual donations to the beleaguered Democrat over the past three years worth just under $1,000. But the obeisance Coakley has paid to the Democratic machine has been priceless. Last June, DiMasi was indicted on seven counts of mail and wire fraud related to pay-for-play schemes worth tens of thousands of dollars in monthly payments. “Where’s Martha?” asked Republican lawmakers.

Coakley let the feds take on the powerful DiMasi. Only after months of foot-dragging did Coakley’s AG office initiate an investigation into the indictments of one of DiMasi’s top cronies, Richard Vitale, on lobbying and campaign finance crimes.

More recently, Coakley’s GOP opponent Scott Brown blew the whistle on campaign finance shenanigans involving her deep-pocketed supporters at the SEIU. The radical labor organization, saddled with nationwide embezzlement scandals and political thuggery, is “pulling out all the stops” for Coakley, and has dumped more than $200,000 into her campaign for radio ads.

In mid-December, SEIU Local 509, which represents public employees, sent two e-mails to 7,500 state government employees at their government e-mail addresses over public computers endorsing Coakley and urging union members to vote for her. The use of state resources for politicking is forbidden under state ethics laws and subject to both civil and criminal penalties.

Coakley’s office has not responded to the complaint. She’s probably too busy writing thank-you notes to all of the fat-cat lobbyists and donors who threw her a high-priced fundraiser in Washington, D.C., this week. Host committee members each raised $10,000 or more for her coffers. They included representatives from drug companies, health insurers and hospitals who joined the Demcare protection racket. (And Coakley has the nerve to attack “shadowy out-of-state organizations” for running ads supporting Brown.)

Washington is already teeming with Democratic foxes guarding the Cash for Corruptocrats henhouse. Isn’t there a nice gardening club in Massachusetts that can take Coakley in?
By Michelle Malkin

To help support Croakley's opponent, Scott Brown, his donation page is here.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Rep. Charlie Rangel swears at Jason Mattera over scandal questions

Rangel can't stand the heat over his mounting ethical/financial scandals.
How many times do we have to ask "Why are Rangel, Dodd, Boxer, Murtha, Frank, Obama, Reid and Nazi Pelosi still representing America"?
2010 is the year to bury (Politically) these scumbags!

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The Fundamental Transformation of America

When Obama wrote a book and said he was mentored as a youth by "Frank," (Frank Marshall Davis) an avowed Communist,
people said it didn't matter.

When it was discovered that his grandparents were strong socialists, sent Obama's mother to a socialist school, introduced Frank Marshall Davis to young Obama,
People said it didn't matter.

When people found out that he was enrolled as a Muslim child in school and his father and stepfather were both Muslims,
people said it didn't matter.

When he wrote in another book he authored, "I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction,"
people said it didn't matter.

When he admitted in his book that he chose Marxist friends and professors in college,
people said it didn't matter.

When he traveled to Pakistan after college on an unknown national passport,
people said it didn't matter.

When he sought the endorsement of the Marxist party in 1996 as he ran for the Illinois Senate,
people said it doesn't matter.

When he sat in a Chicago church for twenty years and listened to a preacher spew hatred for America and preach black liberation theology,
people said it didn't matter.

When an independent Washington organization that tracks Senate voting records gave him the distinctive title as the "most liberal Senator,"
people said it didn't matter.

When the Palestinians in Gaza set up a fund raising telethon to raise money for his election campaign,
people said it didn't matter.

When his voting record supported gun control,
people said it didn't matter.

When he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done,
people said it didn't matter.

When he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan and Mummar Kadaffi and Hugo Chavez,
people said it didn't matter.

When it was pointed out that he was a total newcomer and had absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing,
people said it didn't matter.

When he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals,
people said it didn't matter.

When his voting record in the Illinois senate and in the U.S. Senate came into question,
people said it didn't matter.

When he refused to wear a flag lapel pin and did so only after a public outcry,
people said it didn't matter.

When people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools were taught to sing his praises,
people said it didn't matter.

When he stood with his hands down for the playing of the National Anthem and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance,
people said it didn't matter.

When he surrounded himself in the White house with advisors who were pro gun control, pro abortion, pro homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition,
people said it didn't matter.

When he aired his views on abortion, homosexuality and a host of other issues,
people said it didn't matter.

When he said he favors sex education in kindergarten, including homosexual indoctrination,
people said it didn't matter.

When his background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be found about him,
people said it didn't matter.

When the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate,
people said it didn't matter.

When he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco, a man of questionable character who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a sweet deal on the purchase of his home,
people said it didn't matter.

When it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist, spent a ton of money to get him elected,
people said it didn't matter.

When he started appointing czars who were radicals, revolutionaries, and even avowed Marxist/Communists,
people said it didn't matter.

When he stood before the nation and told us that his intentions were to "fundamentally transform this nation" into something else,
people said it didn't matter.

When it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and served as an attorney for ACORN,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed cabinet members and several advisors who were tax cheats and socialists,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed a science czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Cass Sunstein as regulatory czar and he believes in "Explicit Consent," harvesting human organs without family consent, and to allow animals to be represented in court, while banning all hunting,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual, and organizer of a group called Gay, Lesbian, Straight, Education Network, as safe school czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to teenagers,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Mark Lloyd as diversity czar and he believed in curtailing free speech, taking from one and giving to another to spread the wealth and admires Hugo Chavez,
people said it didn't matter.

When Valerie Jarrett was selected as Obama's senior White House advisor and she is an avowed socialist,
people said it didn't matter.

When Anita Dunn, White House Communications director said Mao Tse Tung was her favorite philosopher and the person she turned to most for inspiration,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Carol Browner as global warming czar, and she is a well known socialist working on Cap and Trade as the nation's largest tax,
people said it doesn't matter.

When he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as green energy czar, who since had to resign when this was made known,
people said it didn't matter.

When Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for Health and Human Services Secretary could not be confirmed, because he was a tax cheat,
people said it didn't matter.

When as president of the United States he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia ,
people said it didn't matter.

When he traveled around the world criticizing America and never once talked of her greatness,
people said it didn't matter.

When his actions concerning the Middle East seemed to support the Palestinians over Israel, our longtime friend,
People said it doesn't matter.

When he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States,
people said it doesn't matter.

When he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense system against the Russians,
People said it doesn't matter.

When he played politics in Afghanistan by delaying sending troops the Field Commanders said we had to have to win,
people said it didn't matter.

When he started spending us into a debt that is so big we can never pay it off,
people said it didn't matter.

When he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions and individuals that got him elected,
people said it didn't matter.

When he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc.
people said it didn't matter.

When he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the government,
people said it didn't matter.

When he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control,
people said it didn't matter.

When he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade,
people said it didn't matter.

When he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State ,
people finally woke up........ but it was too late.

Any one of these things, in and of themselves does not really matter. But.... when you add them up one by one you get a phenomenal score that points to the fact that our Obama is determined to make America over into a Marxist/Socialist society. All of the items in the preceding paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very easily. Before you disavow this, do an internet search. The last paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone. You and I will write that paragraph. Will it read as above or will it be a more happy ending for most of America? Personally, I like happy endings.

If you are an Obama supporter, please do not be angry with me because I think our president is a socialist. There are too many facts supporting this. If you seek the truth you will be richer for it. Don't just belittle the opposition. Search for the truth. I did. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Constitutionalist, Libertarians and what have you, we all need to pull together. We all must pull together or watch the demise of a society that we all love and cherish. If you are a religious person, pray for our nation.

Never before in the history of America have we been confronted with problems so huge that the very existence of our country is in jeopardy. Don't rely on most television news and what you read in the newspapers for the truth. Search the internet. Yes, there is a lot of bad information, lies and distortions there too but you are smart enough to spot the fallacies. Newspapers are a dying breed. They are currently seeking a bailout from the government. Do you really think they are about to print the truth? Obama praises all the television news networks except Fox who he has waged war against. There must be a reason. He does not call them down on any specifics, just a general battle against them. If they lie, he should call them out on it but he doesn't. Please, find the truth, it will set you free.

Our biggest enemy is not China, Russia, or Iran; no, our biggest enemy is a contingent of politicians in Washington DC.

(Author unknown)

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 11, 2010

Is Obama A Closet Racist?

This may be a long article below however Steve Baldwin writes brilliantly.

By Steve Baldwin, Exclusive to Western Center for Journalism

A racist is someone who constantly uses race to explain the world we live in and, in the case of activists, exploits it in the course of finding solutions to political issues.

It may come as a surprise to most Americans that throughout Obama’s career, he has been fixated upon race and this obsession has clearly informed all aspects of his worldview. The media did their best to ignore this aspect of Obama as they feared exposing such an agenda would scare voters away from him. Instead, they constantly portrayed Obama as a racial “unifier.”

But the fact remains that whether it is hate crimes, quotas, reparations, bogus “driving while black” statistics, association with black separatists, and so forth, race for Obama appears to be key to the development of his worldview.

It is important to expose this because our goal should be a color-blind society; moreover, race-based decisions always come at the expense of the rights of others. Obama’s use of race in politics will, ironically, create racial dissension—not to mention confuse the American ideal of equality.

Obama’s obsession with race began in his youth and continued throughout his community organizer career, his political career, and is still evident today.

Obama’s first Mentor is a Racist

Obama’s first lessons on race came from a certified racist named Frank Marshall Davis. As Obama even indicates in his book, Dreams from My Father, “Frank,” as the book refers to him, was his mentor and substitute father. This relationship, according to researchers, lasted from age 9 until Obama left for college.

According to FBI documents obtained by Cliff Kincaid of America’s Survival, Davis was identified by Congressional investigators as a key member of the United States Communist Party. He was either under investigation or under surveillance during much of the Cold War due to his pro-Soviet activities. Indeed, Davis continued to be involved with Communist Party activities during the years he was Obama’s mentor.

Davis’s purpose for residing in Hawaii at that time couldn’t be clearer; the Communist Party had targeted Hawaii largely because of its strategic location and the role it played in our defense effort. Ironically, the mainstream media has decided to hide this story.

What’s more, Davis was less than an ideal mentor. He has been identified by researchers as a sex pervert who wrote a memoir titled, Sex Rebel: Black Memoirs of a Gourmet Gash, in which he boasted of his sex life involving group sex, sex with an underage girl, and being urinated on. The book goes further to relay his colorful drug use.

In addition to his poor ethics, Davis was also a racist. Obama himself reported in his book that “Frank” told him that black people “have a reason to hate [white people].”

FBI files on Davis confirm this attitude; one such file contains a message from Davis in which he states:

In addition to muffing a chance for moral leadership, we have given the
colored people of the globe still another count against the US as a nation. The US is considered to be a White Man’s country. You may be sure that the spectacle of white Americans shooting down the Orientals of North Korea will not be ignored by the rest of Asia and Africa who are struggling to throw off the yoke of what they call ‘White Imperialism.’

Davis hated “white America” for coming to the defense of South Korea. FBI files show that one of Davis’s tactics was to incite anti-white, racial-hatred among blacks in Hawaii, apparently as part of an effort to recruit them into the Communist Party. FBI files also relayed that Davis was unable to get his articles published by a union newspaper because they considered him to be an “Haole (Caucasian) hater.”

It seems impossible for Obama to have spent at least 9 years of his life with Davis without being influenced by his racist attitudes. Indeed, you can see the influence of Davis in Obama’s book:

I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites….I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.

Despite attending elite schools alongside whites his entire life and having been given every opportunity possible to succeed, Obama wrote about his hate for whites in this much ignored passage from his book:

That hate hadn’t gone away; it formed a counter narrative buried deep within each person and at the center of which stood white people- some cruel, some ignorant.

And again from his book:

That’s just how white folks will do you. It wasn’t merely the cruelty involved; I was learning that black people could be mean and then some. It was a particular brand of arrogance, an obtuseness in otherwise sane people that brought forth our bitter laughter. It was as if whites didn’t know they were being cruel in the first place. Or at least thought you deserving of their scorn. White folks.

Community Organizer or Racist Organizer?

When Obama became a community organizer for hard-left causes, he quickly figured out how to use the foundations he worked for to advance his racial agenda. For example, while serving on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, Obama voted to give $6,000 to his own black-separatist church, Trinity United Church of Christ, headed by the racist Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Then Obama co-chaired an alleged “school reform” foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, at which he approved nearly a one million dollar grant to the South Shore African Village Collaborative (SSACV), which stated in its grant application:

Our children need to understand the historical context of our struggles for liberation from those forces that seek to destroy us.

This is a reference to America, the country in which blacks have enjoyed the most freedom and prosperity in the world. One of the trainers hired by the SSACV to instruct teachers, Jacob Carruthers, wrote:

The submission to Western Civilization and its most outstanding offspring, American civilization, is, in reality, surrender to white supremacy.

Carruthers has also written that he believes that when blacks assimilate into American culture, it is comparable to rape. Unsurprisingly, this is not far off from what Obama has written himself:

The Minority assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around.
Only white culture could be neutral and objective. Only white culture could be non-racial, willing to adopt the occasional exotic into its ranks. Only white culture had individuals.

Interestingly enough, while this passage is straight from his book, Dreams from My Father, it was left out of the book’s audio version.

Michelle Shares Obama’s Racism

Obama’s wife, Michelle, also shares these racist attitudes. In her stock speeches to blacks and leftists, she frequently states that America is “downright mean” and is a country “guided by fear” She even infamously remarked that, “for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country.” In context, these statements all imply that America is a racist country. This is strange coming from a woman who grew up in a very nice neighborhood and had more opportunities than most thrown in her face, including the opportunity to attend one of America’s finest universities.

Michelle’s racism came through loud and clear in her Princeton College thesis, a document Obama’s attorneys sought to block, but was finally released by Princeton. In her thesis, she stated that America was founded on “crime and hatred” and that whites were “ineradicably racist.” Her paper discussed two ways that blacks can organize themselves in America: the separationist and integrationist approach, but she clearly identified herself with the separationist school of thought, implying that when blacks integrate with white society they are somehow depriving themselves:

Further integration and/or assimilation into a white culture and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.

And elsewhere in her thesis:

However, with the increasing integration of Blacks into the mainstream society, many ‘integrated Blacks’ have lost touch with the Black culture in their attempts to become adjusted and comfortable in their new culture–the White culture. Some of these Blacks are no longer able to enjoy the qualities which make Black culture so unique or are unable to share their culture openly with other Blacks because they have become so far removed from these experiences and, in some instances, ashamed of them because of their integration.

In other words, integrating with whites somehow makes blacks inferior. This idea is, at its core, a racist idea and it is no different than a KKK leader declaring that whites should separate themselves from all other races so at to not become “contaminated.” She concludes in her thesis that she will spend her life using all her “present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost.” As of now, this is one promise she has kept.

Indeed, Michelle served as the executive director of an activist group called Public Allies, a group allegedly set up to inspire community volunteerism. She, however, turned it into a radical activist training group that taught youngsters that America is essentially a racist country.

What’s more, when questioned early in the presidential primary by MSNBC about why many blacks were supporting Hillary, Michelle said:

First of all, that’s not going to hold – I’m completely confident. Black America will wake up.

Michelle expected all blacks to line up behind her husband, a condescending “blacks have to stick together” notion based on her black separatist ideology.

Obama’s State Senate Career

Obama’s racist attitudes were obvious during his State Senate career. He was obsessed with the rights of criminals, illegal aliens, welfare recipients, etc.–representing everyone except hard-working taxpayers. For example, Obama introduced a bill that created a study intended to analyze the race of people stopped for traffic violations. This notion was based on the outrageous idea that cops are secret racists. In Obama’s world, policemen are supposed to pay attention to the race of potential criminals before they decide to pull them over.

Obama allowed race to influence other bills too, such as one prohibiting home-owners from shooting an intruder in their own home if the gun was not legal. You see, in Chicago, home intruders are disproportionably black, so Obama was simply trying to save “poor black criminals” from being intentionally shot by “evil racist white homeowners.” Obama’s views on race are downright dangerous. They affect the safety and well-being of not just white people, but all Americans.

Indeed, bill after bill dealing with the death penalty, gang violence, and guns, Obama voted on the side benefitting criminals and gangsters. It would seem as though law and order legislation was inherently racist, since they disproportionately affected blacks. He even voted against legislation that would have made gang members eligible for the death penalty if they killed someone to “help their gang.” This is a sign of a racist ideologue, not of a “reformer.”

Racial Reparations

Today, Black separatists believe that to avenge the existence of slavery 145 years ago all whites need to be taxed extra with proceeds going directly to blacks or to their benefit. The idea holds no legal sense—there are no blacks living today who were slaves and no whites living today who had anything to do with slavery. Even more so, most whites are not related to slaveholders, nor are all blacks the descendants of slaves. While the proposal is completely unworkable and probably unconstitutional, this issue is the gold standard for black racists out to seek revenge for the years blacks were enslaved.

Does Obama support such an insane policy? By association, he does. His church, Trinity United Church of Christ passed a resolution in 2001 supporting reparations. The church’s pastor and Obama’s mentor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, was the keynote speaker at a reparations conference. Dr. Iva Carruthers, a member of Obama’s African American Religious Leadership Committee, has been active in pushing black churches to endorse reparations. Another political ally of Obama’s, Chicago Alderman Dorothy Jean Wright Tillman, led an effort on the Chicago City Council to promote reparations. Finally, one of Obama’s key campaign advisors and his former professor, Harvard Law Professor Charles Ogletree, has argued in favor of reparations.

Moreover, as an ACORN attorney, Obama supported the reparations ideology. In a case he was involved with against Citibank, the bank was sued because, according to Obama’s legal team, the bank was approving “more white housing loans,” than “those of black people.” The possibility that the bank was acting purely on financial motives – the whites had, on average, better credit ratings – never seem to enter Obama’s racially obsessed ACORN legal team. The bank lost and was then forced to make more loans to black people regardless of their credit. Not only is this the type of legal harassment which has greatly contributed to the economic crises we’re now it, but it strongly resembles reparations type ideology.

In addition, a bill has already been introduced into Congress by Obama ally, Congressman John Conyers, which creates a commission to study reparation proposals.

Obama’s Racist Church

Most Americans know of Reverend Jeremiah Wright because the media was unable to ignore his incredible rants from the pulpit, including his “God damn America!”statement. Nonetheless, the media gave the impression that such remarks were rare and Obama fed into this lie by acting shocked at such comments. The truth is that such statements were not rare; they were typical. Obama sat through Rev. Wright’s anti-white, anti-American comments for twenty years.

Contrary to Obama’s campaign statements, he considered Reverend Wright one of his mentors. Wright married the Obamas, baptized their daughters and was involved with the Obama campaign until the exposure of his “God damn America” comment forced Obama to pretend like he was distancing himself from Wright.

However, there’s little doubt Wright is an anti-Semite and a racist of the Louis Farrakhan variety. Sunday after Sunday, he would scream about how whites are responsible for creating AIDs as a way of killing off blacks and how America is controlled by “rich white people.” Wright actually went as far as to say that Americans “believe in white supremacy and black inferiority.” He even believes there’s a difference between white and black brains, a staple of white racists. After attending Wright’s church for twenty years, there is no way Obama could have avoided hearing such racist statements. One can only conclude that Obama remained a member of Wright’s church because he believed in Wright’s worldview.

Obama’s church is part of the United Church of Christ, a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual denomination that doesn’t even support many of Christianity’s most basic tenets. It’s more accurately described as a left wing activist group, than a church. Even among UCC congregations, Obama’s church is considered extreme, as it is a part of a movement of black separatist churches that Wright himself says is:

Based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone’s book.

Cone was a rabid black supremacist and Marxist whose works are full of class warfare rhetoric and racist statements. Cone has actually said that if Jesus does not support class struggle, then he is a “white Jesus” and they must “kill him.” He has also said, “Christianity and whiteness are opposites.” He stated, “there will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness.” Cone argues that “the goal of black theology is the destruction of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods.”

Moreover, Wright is friends with Louis Farrakhan, the anti-semantic, racist, Nation of Islam leader and the two actually traveled to Libya together to visit their friend and dictator Muammar Kadafi, along with a plane full of black nationalists.

Obama may have temporarily distanced himself from Wright, but he didn’t distance himself from Wright’s ideology. That would be difficult given that he has been surrounded by people who hold extremist Black Nationalist and black separatist views his entire life. It is for this reason that Farrakhan adores Obama, as evident by this speech he made to a large crowd during the 2008 election:

Brothers and sisters, Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Would God allow Barack to be president of a country that has been so racist, so evil in its treatment of Hispanic, Native Americans, blacks? Obama uses the Presidency to advance his Race-based agenda

Obama’s racial ideology is certainly reflected in his judicial philosophy, a philosophy best exemplified by the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the United States Supreme Court.

Sotomayor’s infamous quote about how a “wise Latina woman… would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male” was repeated over and over by the mainstream media and often treated as a isolated statement, but the reality is that Sotomayor has been issuing race-based opinions – the facts and the law be damned – her entire legal career.

In every case possible, Sotomayor inserted race, oftentimes at the expense of the real issues involved. For example, she ruled that a New York law denying felons the right to vote violated their civil rights because there were disproportionately more blacks and Hispanics in prison! She has even declared that ethnicity should make “a difference in our judging.”

The truth is that ethnicity should never make a difference. Lady Justice is blindfolded for a reason—constitutional principles remain the same regarding of skin color. Sotomayor’s view is the opposite of a color blind society that Martin Luther King fought for. Her racism showed up clearly in the infamous fireman case, in which she threw out a New Haven fireman promotion test because whites happen to perform better than minorities did, even though she was unable to show any evidence whatsoever of bias in the test itself.

Sotomayor was clearly not qualified to be on the court, as dozens of lawyers who knew her have testified to. However, Obama had another agenda and he didn’t care that Sotomayer lacked the intellectual rigor or the proper temperament to be on the court; she was obviously appointed first because of her race and gender, and secondly because she decided cases based on what Obama called “the empathy to understand whit it’s like to be poor, or African-American….” But deciding cases on what someone is, rather than upon the facts and the law, is downright scary, not to mention racist, and it certainly has nothing to do with the application of justice as envisioned by our founding fathers.

The appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General solidifies the idea that Obama intends to use the Federal Government to advanced his race-based agenda on numerous fronts. On Election Day 2008, two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb camped out by a polling place in Philadelphia brandishing a nightstick and yelling racial threats at white voters. The incident was a clear violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the Justice Department prepared to file a civil lawsuit against them. However, the Justice Department suddenly reversed itself and dismissed the charges.

Despite inquiries from Congressmen and the United States Commission on Civil Rights, the Justice Department refuses to discuss the case. We do know that career lawyers at Justice who recommended pursuing the case were overturned by a top political appointee—this could not happen without explicit approval from Holder.

Team Obama has sent their message loud and clear: It is apparently fine for militant anti-white Black Panther activists to intimidate voters at a polling place, but you can be sure that if KKK members were harassing black voters, the full extent of the law would have come crashing down upon their heads immediately.

Based on the appointments of Sotomayor and Holder we can expect a dramatic expansion of the use of racial preferences within the law, which, our course, will make race relations worse, not better. As The New York Times reported in September:

The Obama administration is planning a major revival of high-impact civil rights enforcement against policies, in areas ranging from housing to hiring, where statistics show that minorities fare disproportionately poorly.

This is outrageous. It defies logic to assume that in every area of American life where minorities don’t do as well as others, automatically means the existance of a racist conspiracy. As the San Diego Union editorial puts it:

This editorial page is an ardent believer that disparate treatment of minorities in any avenue of American life is odious. But the problems with the Justice Department going after any business, university or non-profit if they don’t meet a bureaucratically decided ‘disparate impact’ standard are legion….This view is so open-ended that it is an invitation to endless legal wrangling.

The San Diego Union continues:

Eric Holder now has adopted a heavy-handed approach to civil rights enforcement that could put the executive branch on a collision course with the Supreme Court adopting a default view that any statistical disparities reflect unlawful practices.

But the impending harassment of even the private sector for non-compliance with bogus and probably unconstitutional race-based regulations should not come as a surprise to anyone who knows anything about Obama. To Obama, forcing the government to carry out his race-based ideology has always been one of his goals as demonstrated by his own statements and actions throughout his career.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Yes, Be Afraid — Be Very Afraid

Awesome story from IBD Editorials

War On Terror: Our top counterterrorism officials were "shocked" that an "individual" conducted an al-Qaida plot. They must have been asleep when the shoe bomber struck eight years ago. Are they still asleep?

White House counterterrorism czar John O. Brennan and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, the two highest-ranking officials charged with protecting America from terrorist attacks, say they failed to see the tree because they were busy looking at the forest.

The two held a joint White House briefing after the president's statement last Thursday. They were asked, "What was the most shocking, stunning thing that you believe came out of the reviews?"

Their answer is what was stunning.

Brennan said that "we had a strategic sense of sort of where they were going, but we didn't know they had progressed to the point of actually launching individuals here. And we have taken that lesson, and so now we're all on top of it."

According to Secretary Napolitano, "the tactic of using an individual to foment an attack, as opposed to a large conspiracy or a multiperson conspiracy such as we saw in 9/11 ... really emphasizes now the renewed importance on how different intelligence is integrated and analyzed, and threat streams are followed through."

Why is it so hard to envision a young, radicalized African Muslim like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab being willing and able to act alone? Shoe bomber Richard Reid did the same thing in December 2001 on American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami, failing to detonate explosive footwear in his case rather than underwear.

Reid's admitted accomplice, British-born Saajid Badat, at the time had even planned his own suicide bombing of a flight from Amsterdam to the U.S. — just like Abdulmutallab.

The late New York Times columnist and Nixon White House speechwriter William Safire called the 9/11 attacks the result of "a failure of imagination" on the part of the U.S.; Brennan on Thursday said the Christmas Day bombing "was a failure to connect and integrate and understand the intelligence we had."

But how much imagination or integration does it take to be on the lookout for terror plots identical to ones that took place before?

Like a real connect-the-dots game, almost anyone should have been able to figure out that another Reid-style, lone-operative plot was a real possibility.

The only conclusion to be reached is that this country's counterterrorism efforts have been switched to autopilot. After all, top officials from the president on down don't like to refer to our challenges against the world's jihadists as a "global war on terror."

They don't call it a war — and they obviously don't consider it to be a war, but rather a law enforcement issue. So why should anyone expect them — or those they supposedly manage and inspire — to act with an urgency that only a war can demand?

Replacing wartime zeal is the complacent attitude that ultimately says "the lawyers will handle this." Why else would we be absurdly setting the stage for a circuslike spectacle in New York City to try al-Qaida prisoners of war for their roles as 9/11 conspirators?

No doubt there are trial lawyers getting goose bumps at the thought of "the system working" and the most infamous enemies of the U.S. receiving justice the way everyone else does — in a courthouse within the jurisdiction of where their crimes took place.

But it will make the city a tempting target for more attacks. And it will set the stage for a propaganda bonanza for al-Qaida.

POWs, even ones in this new kind of war, aren't burglars or mafia gangsters; they will use all their "rights" and lawyerly stunts in service of their deadly ideology. A military court with limited rights is where they belong.

Legalism is also behind closing Guantanamo Bay and incomprehensibly sending terrorists back to terrorism hotbeds. A new Pentagon classified report is said to have found that one-fifth of released Gitmo detainees have returned to their old terrorist tricks.

If we were really on a war footing, there would be no need to revise our policy and stop sending detainees to Yemen, as the Obama administration announced last week. Indeed, we wouldn't be sending those POWs anywhere.

War is scary. Scarier still is a government in denial that evil people are waging war against our country and our civilization.

Bookmark and Share