Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Sheriff David Clarke on Obama's War on Cops

This is a portion of the transcript of Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke subbing for Glenn Beck on his radio Show. he transcript may have some slight errors.

Let me start with an introduction: I'm your host for today, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. You may know me. You may not know me. It's irrelevant at this point. I'm the host today.

Let me take care of a couple of housekeeping measures first. This is the Glenn Beck Program. Glenn Beck is a brand. Glenn Beck has built this brand. He's worked hard at it. He's good at what he does. Every once in a while, he allows somebody to pilot the ship. I've done it before for him. It's an honor to be with you this morning and to be a part of this brand, the Glenn Beck Program. And I're to the protect the brand. But at the same time, as always, TheBlaze has given me the freedom to express my views, and they may differ from some of the things that Glenn says not many. They may differ from some of the things that you believe and espouse and so on and so forth. And that's okay.

I don't mind discourse. But I'm here to protect the brand. Not only to me, but it's important to Glenn as well, but there may be some times, some rocky moments. But I always remind the people tuning in, don't take it out on Glenn, please. Don't take it out on TheBlaze. Take it out on me. I have big shoulders. I get blamed for a lot of stuff. I get piled on a lot. It's kind of the environment I'm in. I don't whine about it. So if I say something that rubs you the wrong way or whatever, you feel like you want to call in and talk about it, the number is 888-727-BECK. That's 888-727-2325.

What's coming up on the program today? Well, first, we're going to start out with an election wrap-up. I know the election has been over since November 8th, November 9th. And; but there's a lot going on still. Today's a big day. The electoral college meets. That's when they truly pick the president of the United States, by the Constitution, by the law, and that will happen sometime today. All 50 states will gather. Their electors. And they'll make that determination.

If we go by the states that were won on November 8th, Donald Trump should be elected, duly elected, president of the United States, by the electoral college. But, you know, we're in some weird times. And some goofy things have happened and some goofy things will continue to happen. People continue to try to work the electors of the electoral college. Going to talk about that in one of the segments down the road.

Also going to talk about immigration. That is going to be a big issue for this upcoming Congress, the new Congress that will be seated on January 20th as well.

And the first 100 days are always talked about. A president; a new administration comes in. Even if the president is reelected and he starts another term, the first 100 days are important. They set the tone. The first 100 days is an opportunity, if you will, for the incoming president to set the stage, set the vision for the country, get some things going. It's very important they get off to a fast start. That's why they have this concept called the first 100 days. And I'll tell you what, it can make or break an administration. If you get bogged down, you will be that way, and you will struggle. So you've got to get out of the gate fast. Donald Trump plans to do just that, as he's putting his cabinet together. But immigration is one of those things this new Congress is going to have to take up.

It was one of the major platforms of the Trump campaign. Immigration reform. Closing the border. Building the wall. So on and so forth. There's some other things that he wants to address in that first 100 days as well, the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. So we'll talk about the immigration aspect of it because it's going to be big.

And there's many facets to that, as you may know. So I want to hear from you on that. Again, that number is 888-727-BECK. 888-727-2325.

Also, this first hour, we're going to talk about the opioid epidemic sweeping America. Folks, I want to tell you that this thing is touching everybody. It is a crisis. It's not getting all the attention; it's getting some media attention. But it's not getting all the attention that I think it should be. Because we're talking about a generation now of people, specifically young people, who have been gripped by this opioid and heroin epidemic. And we'll talk about that.
Also, I'll be joined by Heather Mac Donald, author of The War on Cops. Heather is a researcher, a Thomas W. Smith fellow at the Manhattan Institute. She's a contributing editor of the City Journal Magazine. She's written several books. Her latest one being The War on Cops. And we're going to talk about an article that was published in the Wall Street Journal over the weekend, how Donald Trump can change the rhetoric in the war on cops. So we'll be joined by her. And we'll have much, much more.

But here's where I want to start: This thing I opened up this program by saying I was not in a real good mood this morning. I learned over the weekend that President Obama in one final move, kicking law enforcement in the teeth by selecting an individual, Abu-Jamal. He's a cop killer. Actually, he didn't appoint Abu-Jamal. But Abu-Jamal is a cop killer, 1981, he killed Danny Faulkner in Philadelphia, a police officer who was 25 years old.

Abu-Jamal was a Black Panther. And what happened was the officer, Faulkner, made a traffic stop. A scuffle ensued. Abu-Jamal's brother was scuffling with the law enforcement officer. Abu-Jamal saw it. He came over. He shot and killed Officer Faulkner. Officer Faulkner was found face up, bullets in his back. He shot him before he hit the ground, then stood over him, straddled him, and shot him in the forehead. Very famous case.

Abu-Jamal was convicted and sentenced to death. And then in a turn of events, he was granted a new trial because there was an error in the jury instructions on a death penalty. So they settled the case, giving him life in prison without parole.
Anyway, there was an attorney. Debo Adegbile. Debo Adegbile was an attorney for the NAACP, the legal defense fund. He was not representing Abu-Jamal. Abu-Jamal had competent counsel, but he entered a brief into the case; a friend of the court, talking about Debo Adegbile.

Debo Adegbile is a straight-up cop hater and a black racialist. Several times President Obama tried to jam Debo Adegbile down our throats, first by nominating him to be a federal judge and then tried to nominate him; both of these required US Senate confirmation. He tried to nominate him to head the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Now, keep in mind, Debo Adegbile is a straight-up cop hater. He's not a good fit to lead the civil rights division of the United States Department of Justice. He's also not a good fit to be a federal judge.

Because like I said, he's a black racialist. He sees everything through the lens of race. Thinks all whites are racist. The Senate struck down his; his judgeship. And then he withdrew; Adegbile withdrew his name from consideration for the US DOJ Civil Rights Division post because he wasn't going to be confirmed.

Well, in one last move, President Obama put this individual; I got to be careful here. But I said I'm not in a good mood today. But he put him on the US DOJ Civil Rights Division, in an appointment that's going to last six years. A kick in the teeth to every law enforcement officer in the country.

This is who Barack Obama is. Barack Obama is also a straight-up cop hater. I've said that before. I've said that on TV, nationally. And people would ask, ;Do you really believe that President Obama is a cop hater? And I'd look them right back in the eye and go, Yes, I do, and I can prove it. And I'd go on to state these instances. This is just one. But you remember the Cambridge, Massachusetts, case, where a friend of Obama's was arrested by Cambridge Police. And Obama said the police officers academy stupidly in arresting his friend.

No, they didn't. They were doing their job. That started it.

Obama was also very intricate in starting the war on cops. So we'll see how this goes. I think incoming US attorney Jeff Sessions would do well to find a spot, if they can't stop this move — to find some spot in some corner office and have Debo Adegbile counting paper clips. That's kind of what needs to happen. We're going to take a break. On the other side, we're going to come back, and we're going to talk some post-election wrap-up. I'm Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. This is the Glenn Beck Radio Program.


DAVID: Welcome back to the program. I'm your host for today. Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke. This is the Glenn Beck Program.

I'm here with you tomorrow too. I don't know if that's going to be good or bad news for you. Joined us today, I think it will be good news. But I'll let you know as well. Two days, so I can get some stuff going here.

Let me do a little self-promoting before I get into the first topic, which is going to be some post election results.

You can follow me on Twitter @SheriffClarke. And that's C-L-A-R-K-E. Don't forget the e, otherwise, you might get some other Twitter handle. And you'll look, and you'll say, ;What the heck is this; That's the good stuff, folks. That's the stuff the national; the liberal media pays attention to. And they look every time I put out a tweet to try to contort it into something I did not say. But that's okay.

But it's @SheriffClarke. C-L-A-R-K-E. I also have a blog. You can follow me on my blog, and it's ThePeoplesSheriff@Patheos.com. Patheos is P-A-T-H-E-O-S. And I also have a book coming out. My first book is going to be coming out in March of 2017. But you can preorder it now at Amazon, or you can go to Barnes & Noble and get your preorder in.

What's this book about? It's called Cop Under Fire. As you may know, we've become an increasingly divided and polarized nation in recent years, growing racial tension. You have animosity toward law enforcement professionals. Government corruption and disregard for our constitutional process. There's no easy answers to these. This book is not just going to be a recitation of things that are problematic in America. I don't say wrong in America. We have some problems. We have some issues. But it's not going to be the same, you know, here are the issues facing America. But what I try to do is take those things that deeply affect us, and I point out in this book, Cop Under Fire, how we can rise above these current troubles and these issues and we can truly become that great nation in pursuit of liberty and justice from all. So, again, that's Cop Under Fire at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. You can preorder that, in you have a law enforcement friend, if you have a law enforcement officer retired or current in your family. It's going to be a must read if you; even citizens in general. It's going to be a fascinating book, not just because I wrote it. But it comes from the heart. And anybody that has listened to me over the last, I don't know, three, four, five, years, you know, I speak from the heart. I don't pull any punches. I don't hold anything back. I just tell you the way I see it. Am I right on everything? Of course not. Do I have all the answers? Not hardly.

However, I put it to you straight. Straight talk is what you're going to get from me. Unvarnished. And I offer some things that are food for thought for a way forward.

Now, let's get into this post election, presidential election. 2016. Happened on November 8th. A lot has been said about it. Much has been talked about, but you haven't heard my perspective on this thing.

We may differ a little bit on some of the things here, but like I said, I don't shy away from that. I believe discourse, differing points of view, different schools of thought, I believe that stuff is healthy in a democracy. We should be able to politely disagree. Some spirited discourse back and forth. Nothing wrong with that. I love that. Like I said, I think it's healthy in a democracy. And it shouldn't denigrate into the name-calling and some of the other things that it does when people differ with somebody else's views. Let's just have educated conversation and skip all the other stuff. You know, I mean, if you say something; for instance, if somebody has different views on gay marriage, all of a sudden you're a homophobe. You know, if you believe that the United States is a Judeo-Christian nation; not to the exclusion of any other religion. Did not say that. But if you believe that the principles that this country are founded on were Judeo-Christian, if you believe that, then you're an Islamophobe. Right? That's what it denigrates into.

And you can go on and on and on. You're a racist if you believe in the Constitution, the rule of law, the Founding Fathers, the history of this nation, you're a racist. And that's what everything seems to end up; where everything seems to end up, and it's very unfortunate. Because like I said, you know, with critical thought, we truly can move this nation forward and become this shining city on the hill that I believe we already are. But we've gotten away from some concepts that have grounded this nation and led it to be that shining city on a hill. But if we just allow people to shut down people we don't agree with, it's not going to be very good.

But, you know, the post election, I look back; and I supported Donald Trump for president of the United States. I supported him after the primary. I stayed out of endorsing anybody in the primary, Republican primary, I'm talking about. First of all, I'm not a member of the Republican Party. I'm not a member of the Democrat Party.

I run as a Democrat. Sheriff in Milwaukee County. I'm elected as a Democrat. But I don't belong to a political party. I don't believe in belonging to a political party. If you do, that's your business. I don't care what your politics are. It's neither here nor there. But that's why I didn't endorse anybody in the Republican Party. I wanted the people — we, the people, the members of that party to select a candidate. So I stayed out of the way. I had numerous candidates ask me to endorse them during the primary. I stayed out of it. I made it clear. I'm keeping my powder dry. But I made this clear to whoever comes out of this process as the nominee for the Republican Party, I will back and I will back 100 percent.
Folks, I'm a man of my word. And when I say something, you can take it to the bank. So Donald Trump obviously was the victor. And he came back around to me and asked for support. And I said to him, Mr. President; he wasn't president at the time. I said, Mr. Trump, I don't know what I can do for you. But I made it clear I'd back whoever won. You are the winner. I will do everything I can. I will fight as hard as I can to help you become the 45th president of the United States. That's how I arrived at my decision.

And I just believe that after that process, the convention, which I spoke at; that was an honor. I thought it was time for conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, some independents, to put all that stuff aside in the name of the country. That's what I did. And that's why I supported Donald Trump. I offered no apology. I'm just trying to tell you where I came from in that decision. But you look at what's happening now with this; this whole process. Election is over. The election is over. We have a president-elect, his name is Donald Trump. He's putting his government together. He's putting his cabinet together.

And he needs our support, folks, for the country. All right? The left even today, with the electoral college, they don't want to believe that the election is over. But it is.

We need to take a break. On the other side, we'll continue this. This is Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke in for Glenn Beck. This is the Glenn Beck Program.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

A Japanese description of the Palestinians.....

It is so ironic that a Japanese person, from a country we and our allies defeated when they were allies with Germany , wrote so brilliantly about the fatal problems that have been facing Israel since the end of the war in which they were allied with those who wanted to annihilate Jews! This is a brilliant assessment.

By Yashiko Sagamori

If you are so sure that ' Palestine , the country, goes back through most of recorded history,' I expect you to be able to answer a few basic questions about that country of Palestine :

1. When was it founded and by whom?

2. What were its borders?

3. What was its capital?

4. What were its major cities or name one major city?

5. What constituted the basis of its economy?

6. What was its form of government?

7. Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat?

8. Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation?

9. What was the language of the country of Palestine?

10. What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine?

11. What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and tell what was the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against the US dollar, German mark, GB pound, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan on that date.

12. And, finally, since there is no such country today, what caused its demise and when did it occur?

You are lamenting the 'low sinking' of a 'once proud' nation. Please tell me, when exactly was that 'nation' proud and what was it so proud of?

And here is the least sarcastic question of all: If the people you mistakenly call 'Palestinians' are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over -- or thrown out of -- the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War.

I hope you avoid the temptation to trace the modern day 'Palestinians' to the Biblical Philistines: substituting etymology for history won't work here.

The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel ; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it 'the Palestinian people' and installed it in Gaza , Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the 'West Bank' and Gaza, respectively?

The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza , Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so-called 'Palestinians' have only one?motivation: the destruction of Israel , and in?my book that is not sufficient to consider them a nation' -- or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled

In fact, there is only one way to achieve peace in the Middle East . Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel 's ancient sovereignty over Gaza , Judea, and Samaria .

That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again was its beginning?

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Scumbags of the MSM Won't Report the Black Violence against Cops

This article below is written by Colin Flaherty and is loaded with facts. These facts will not be presented by the Traitors of the MSM (Mainstream Media). Some of the language is from the Thugs in the #blackLIESmatter gang so it is offensive. Yet that is how the Left Wingers roll, violent and offensive.

Media Ignore the Tsunami of Black Violence against Cops
By Colin Flaherty

The shootings in Dallas did not make much of a difference. Not to the reporters explaining the protest and the reason behind the assassination of five police officers.

The reason for the demonstration was simple and beyond pushback:

White cops shoot black people all over the country, all the time, for no reason whatsoever.

Everybody knows that. So sad.

Some took it to the next level: The head of a black group called Dallas Action said the killings were a wake up call to let people know how cops are picking on black people.

All the time.

For no reason whatsoever. The local Fox reporter in Dallas took the comments in stride, quickly changing the topic to all the pretty lights on nearby police cars.

Not one reporter at any point even hinted at how black violence is wildly out of proportion.

Not one reporter talked to any cop willing to tell the truth about how police are relentless victims of black hostility and violence and murder — all over the country.

And how black on cop violence and defiance are now the default response.

Not the other way around. A brief magical mystery tour of black on cop violence over the last few weeks.

In Baltimore, one week ago, hundreds of black people took to the streets to celebrate the life of the recently killed rapper Lor Scoota. He was best known for celebrating guns, drugs, money and bitches in his videos and in his life.

Eventually cops showed up: They were greeted with bottles and rocks and threats and taunts when they suggested to the hundreds of black people that destroying property and disobeying the law was not a good idea.

The police chief dutifully defended the rioters, reminding the Baltimore audience that event was largely peaceful.

As was Dallas.

Top political figures in Baltimore made their way to the scene of the crimes to blame police for antagonizing the black people. As usual, the Baltimore Sun and other local media wagged their tails and went along with the story: the greatest hoax of our lifetimes — the lie of black victimization. All documented in that scintillating best seller Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.

In Syracuse on Father’s Day in the ghetto, 500 black people were blowing some weed and shooting some guns when a female cop showed up.

The videos show the crowds fleeing the gunfire as the officer runs towards it. When her backup arrived, they found the cop on the ground, surrounded by a large group of black people beating and kicking her and trying to steal her gun.

One black man was running around, pleading for a gun to shoot the police.

The next night, the cops returned and received similar scorn, hostility and violence.

The local papers pretended they had never heard of anything like that before, when, truth is: That is a regular part of life in Syracuse.

On July 4, on North Beach in South Haven, Michigan, black people threw rocks and bottles at cops, whose only fault was they did not like black people throwing rocks and bottles at beach goers.

In Baton Rouge, the night following the death of Alton Sterling, the saint with a long record of crime and violence who was killed resisting arrest for threatening people with a gun, hundreds of black people took to the streets to sing the new black national anthem: Fuck the Police.

police think they have the authority to kill a minority.

Ice Cube will swarm

On any muthafucka in a blue uniform

Just cuz I'm from the CPT, punk police are afraid of me

A young nigga on a warpath

And when I'm finished, it's gonna be a bloodbath

You remember Ice Cube: He’s the smiling old grandpa of TV and movie fame, still preaching violence against the police.

In Oklahoma City, a black high school teacher took to Facebook to declare that all white hillbillies should die in a tornado. The local school discovered the First Amendment, and the local TV news gang said we should forgive him because he said he was sorry.

This kind of generosity is missing, of course, in dozens and dozens of news stories of recent cases around the country where white people make an off hand remark about race and find themselves out of a career.

Like the firefighter in a suburb of Boston in June, who was part of a crew responding to a violent party of 1000 black people who said he wanted to turn the hose on them.


Read the entire article HERE at the American Thinker.


Bookmark and Share

Monday, September 12, 2016

Benghazi 9/11/12: The Obama White House Deception

This is a terrific explanation from Martin Harry on the horrific Benghazi attack on 9/11/12.
Why did the Obama Regime and Hillary Clinton Lie about this attack? Well the terrorist attacks which killed four brave Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/12 threatened Obama's re-election.

After campaigning on the theme that he had decimated al-Qaeda he sought to cover-up al-Qaeda's involvement in the Benghazi attacks. We can all remember that Soetoro sent out the Vile Susan Rice to lie all over TV about this Islamo-Nazi attack. When the cover-up fell apart, the Obama Administration then sought to cover-up the cover-up. This deception continued after the President's re-election.

The attack went on for 13 Hours and there was no sign of Obama. Where was he hiding?

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 22, 2016

Ted Cruz and Mark Steyn Crush Global Warming Lunatics

Mark Steyn and Sen. Cruz Respond to Sen. Schatz and Admiral Titley at Climate Science Hearing!

The Watermelon People (green on the outside and RED on the inside) have been pushing these global warming lies far too long. Now some of these Marxists want to "lock up" people who will not believe the lies.

Also see:

The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'

What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?
By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer
May 26, 2014

Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research.

One frequently cited source for the consensus is a 2004 opinion essay published in Science magazine by Naomi Oreskes, a science historian now at Harvard. She claimed to have examined abstracts of 928 articles published in scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and found that 75% supported the view that human activities are responsible for most of the observed warming over the previous 50 years while none directly dissented.

In 2013, John Cook, an Australia-based blogger, and some of his friends reviewed abstracts of peer-reviewed papers published from 1991 to 2011. Mr. Cook reported that 97% of those who stated a position explicitly or implicitly suggest that human activity is responsible for some warming. His findings were published in Environmental Research Letters.

Mr. Cook's work was quickly debunked. In Science and Education in August 2013, for example, David R. Legates (a professor of geography at the University of Delaware and former director of its Center for Climatic Research) and three coauthors reviewed the same papers as did Mr. Cook and found "only 41 papers—0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent—had been found to endorse" the claim that human activity is causing most of the current warming. Elsewhere, climate scientists including Craig Idso, Nicola Scafetta, Nir J. Shaviv and Nils- Axel Morner, whose research questions the alleged consensus, protested that Mr. Cook ignored or misrepresented their work.

Rigorous international surveys conducted by German scientists Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch—most recently published in Environmental Science & Policy in 2010—have found that most climate scientists disagree with the consensus on key issues such as the reliability of climate data and computer models. They do not believe that climate processes such as cloud formation and precipitation are sufficiently understood to predict future climate change.

Surveys of meteorologists repeatedly find a majority oppose the alleged consensus. Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.

There is no basis for the claim that 97% of scientists believe that man-made climate change is a dangerous problem.

Mr. Bast is president of the Heartland Institute. Dr. Spencer is a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite.

See the Full Article at The Wall Street Journal Here

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 28, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

Obama, like your pal Al Sharptongue, you must think we igament.  We ain’t igament; we jus’ know our American History, which you sure as hell don’t.

You claimed that we aren’t a Christian nation.  Wrong, m’ boy. . this nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles.  How can you, as a professed Constitutional scholar, disagree with it if you never bothered to read it for yourself ?  Have someone read The Constitution to you.  Seriously.
You claimed that this nation will never go to war against Islam.  You must have forgotten to tell us the part about Islam declaring war on us.  Huh?
You’ve apologized everywhere you’ve traveled, for what you perceive as the sins we’ve committed against other peoples. Can you tell me precisely who authorized you to shoot off your mouth & lie through your teeth to apologize for this exceptional nation of 330+ million exceptional people?
You claim that Islam and Muslims have contributed all manner of noble and positive things to the United States since its founding. Your claims are fiction. They can’t be found in any recorded history. What R U smoking?
Our Constitution states categorically that no official religion shall be established in this nation. Christ, Moses or Allah have no special place or privileges in the everyday function of this Government, at any level. All  legitimate citizens are free to believe and practice their religions as they wish but – in no way are they permitted to force their belief systems on anyone else.  Never, ever!  Shariah is for lunatics, not Americans.
After your final term as president, you’ll be free to bloviate and lie till the cows come home – you’ll be able to talk, talk, talk until your gums turn blue – no one will givvashit. You’ll be relieved of the burden of traveling the world in Air Force One so, you might consider using your time to educate yourself in the real history of this nation although as I just mentioned, no one will givvashit.   You’ll be history, m’boy – and I might add – good riddance.
                 MORT KUFF   © 7-4-2016   

Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 20, 2016

Ted Deutch, Lois Frankel & Patrick Murphy

MORT’s meanderings.

Once again, our local version of the ‘Three Stooges’ have proven just how bankrupt they are when it comes to logic & common sense, morality, principled policies, love of country and facing radical Islamist terrorism - and just how corrupt they are at playing partisan politics.  It is beyond disgusting.
The delusional Democrats who continue to elect & re-elect such fools to represent them in the Congress are in reality, fooling themselves. They deserve what they get but sadly, the rest of us are being terribly mis-represented at the same time, by these same fools.  An immoral majority of S.E. Florida voters need to revisit their loyalty to many-times failed Democrat policies. Try thinking.
The knee-jerk reaction of these Three Stooges to the Orlando shooting massacre, follows in the path of their mentor the late, thug-brained Sen.Ted Kennedy.  He never failed to rush to judgment and the conclusion that the answer to Islamist terrorism was more gun control; the answer to failed economic policy was a higher minimum wage and the answer to our failed education system was more ludicrous education policies and oh, don’t forget, publicly-funded abortion.

Deutch, Frankel & Murphy are grossly incompetent at every- thing except corruption, dereliction of duty and malfeasance of office.   Keep that in mind when you vote for Hillary.
                MORT KUFF  © 6-18-2016

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

            Obama is angry.  
He is also living in a mind-set that has zilch  to do with the reality of life on this Earth.
In his third day of speeches following the horrific massacre in the Gay club in Orlando, he went off on a tear that included the usual creation of straw men for him to knock down; accusations against the Republicans in Congress for opposing his policies; and hurling a personal attack against the presumptive (R) candidate Trump, accusing him  inaccurately, of proposing to ban all Muslim immigration.  Obama creates pot holes.
Following his long-established pattern, Obama conjured up false narratives as if they had actually been espoused by someone – and then proceeded to ridicule them with all the acerbic sarcasm of which he is capable. None of it makes any sense. Nada.
He then took off on a wild-eyed tirade about his seven plus years of avoiding the use of the term, “radical Islamist terrorism”.  He posited the non-argument that use of this term wouldn’t change a thing and certainly, wouldn’t stop the extremists from committing their continuing reign of terror against innocent civilians.  No one in this nation has been known to claim such a stupid premise and yet, Obama displayed an off-the-chart outrage at ‘these people’. Obama creates pot holes and then invariably, steps in them.
Then, as if he were ripping the scab off a half-healed wound, he launched into yet, another rant against gun ownership, especially what he referred to as a ‘war weapon’, the AR-15 rifle. What this anti-military Coward-in-Chief doesn’t know about weaponry, would fill a giant, ocean-going container ship.  Just as there is no cure for ‘stupid’, there is no solution readily available for this man’s ‘willful ignorance’.  All serious attempts at educating him to factual reality have ended in utter failure.  He is simply ineducable.
Obama is someone who is boiling over with anger in addition to exhibiting the stunning manifestations of his classic Narcissism.  These maladies, coupled with his outsize arrogance and his urgent need to express his Islamist ideology every-hour-on-the-hour, leave precious little room for his wide-ranging mood swings.
The sooner he leaves the Oval Office with all its responsibilities that he has managed to side-step for 7.5 years, the happier we’ll all be.  If he were to take up residence in Syria, we’d be even more chipper.  At least he’d be in his element.  What a dipshit.

                              MORT KUFF  © 6-15-2016

Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 13, 2016


MORT's meanderings.
The White House can't speak.
Has anyone noticed?  The White House. located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., is an edifice made of brick & mortar that has been painted 'white'.  It is a mute structure; it can't speak.  Therefore, statements represented as coming from the White House, are either  statements coming directly from the President or, indirectly from his authorized spokespeeps.
Are you with me so far?  
Why should we be expected to believe any pronouncements that are veiled in anonymity as,  'the authoritative word being handed down, from the White House'?  If the information being sent from 'on high' to the citizens of the United States - who by the way, are the sole  owners of that edifice and have hired its occupants for a limited engagement - is indeed meant to be taken as 'official', then it should be in the form of an official document, signed by its originator.
Are you still with me?
What's the problem here?  The problem is that old bugaboo, the issue of 'Transparency in Government'.  There never seems to be any shyness about taking credit for 'successes'.  But, there seems to be a great deal of reticence when it comes to attaching a name to statements or pronouncements whenever there is concern from 'on high', that the message is calculated to  either generate controversy or worse, is likely not be received  with overwhelming acceptance. Are we clear?

And so, as a natural-born citizen of the United States of America and part-owner of that edifice located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW in Washington, D.C., I have appointed myself as a Committee of One, to hereby demand that every official statement or pronouncement that emanates from 'The White House', be signed by the individual who sent it, accompanied by his or her official title.  Thus, a name and a title indicating that individual's identity and official relationship to the President, will be established and made known to the public.  Got that?
I don't think it is too much to ask that our elected officials and their appointees be required to publically stand behind their 'official' statements - all their statements, every single one.  So please - no more anonymous proclamations, pronouncements or propaganda issued from, The White House.  The White House can't speak - remember?
Attention, complicit Members of the Fourth Estate - that would be alla yez:  Are you able to process the info above?  If not, contact me at mortkuff@bellsouth.net  and I'll 'splain it to you.

MORT KUFF  © 10-15-2013

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

Hillary Robbem Clinton
No more unfit misfit has ever run for the Office of the President of the United States, than Hillary Robbem Clinton.
We’ve had a few more than our share of unfit misfits that have actually been seated in the Oval Office, thanks to a majority of misguided voters.  Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama jump to mind, immediately.     (*Pause to recover*)
I see that Madelyn NotSo Bright and Dick Durbin are supporting Hag Hillary’s ill-conceived run for the candidacy of the Delusional Dumbshit Democraps.  That’s sufficient information for me to prove my point.
Any one of the stage-full of Republican candidates who are currently trying to tear themselves to shreds, would be quantum leaps better than Hillary.  Try and try again as they might, to portray ‘Hag Hill’ as  possessing a rich record of accomplishment in public service, her loyal slugs have been unable to unearth and document even one genuine, positive, legitimate accomplishment,  Pretty sad, huh?
What manner of fools who proudly tag themselves as ‘Progessives’, does it take to rally ‘round a proven, untrustworthy liar who hasn’t a clue how to conduct herself in an interview, much less in public office? The only box she can check is that she thinks she is deserving because she’s been around Washington, D.C. for so long.  If that’s a legitimate qualifier, then the Old Post Office building on Pennsylvania Avenue is equally, if not more deserving as a presidential candidate.
         MORT KUFF   © 2-7-2016

Bookmark and Share

Monday, June 6, 2016

MORT’s meanderings


Would Michelle and Barack allow any
of the Syrian refugees to babysit
for Sasha & Malia?
                                                                                 Hmmm?  Just axxin’.
                                                                                                  MORT KUFF   © 4-22-2016

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Obama as a Speaker

Many people think Pres. Obama is an excellent speaker - a man who can speak without notes.
But to really see his eloquence, you should see this clip. It shows what happens when the
Teleprompter isn't working.

Jim Pirretti

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 16, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

America, we have a problem.
Sorry to be the one breaking the bad news to you my fellow Americans but, you don’t seem to be aware of what you cannot see or hear. Or is it that you refuse to see or hear the raw facts regarding the critical mass of the mess that confronts us today, in this once exceptional nation?
Maybe it has just escaped your notice since you’ve been so occupied with lives that matter; the climate that is always changing; ignoring the influx of illegal, radical thugs & lunatics bent on our destruction; pondering the stupefying question about which bathroom to use; loudly screaming for an unlimited minimum wage; and blindly supporting this Commander-in-Chief as he continues to cave-in to the bullies of the world who hate us and our way of life - the bad guys who thirst for nuclear weapons and for new ways to destroy the freedoms of the West.
As a nation that is now populated with an inordinately large segment of people that have degenerated into a state of cluelessness, carelessness & something-for-nothing greediness, we have permitted ourselves to become myopic to reason, oblivious to facts and unwilling to confront the truth of what we have brought down upon our own heads.   
If one reviews the list of presidents we’ve hired, beyond those first few who founded this nation, it is easy to see that we’ve chosen some doozies.  With the exception of Lincoln, Reagan and one or two others, we seem to have had a penchant for hiring men who were incompetent, misguided, immoral, venal or worse.  In some cases, we re-elected them because the other choices were even more unacceptable. And so in 2008, we foolishly elected a Son of Islam thinking he was going to be our ‘first black president’ because as all the smart folks knew, that would surely be the answer to all our problems.  Can you say, ‘Suicidal’?
I won’t take the time and space to itemize the litany of ‘fundamental changes’ he promised that turned out to be a non-stop series of oppressive regulations and control-freak power grabs emanating from the Oval Office.  Many were done by Presidential fiat in the middle of the night.  Many are blatantly unconstitutional.  All are squeezing the life out of America.
We now have the choice to elect the ‘first female incompetent’ who promises to continue the reign of ‘ObamaOppression’ and even enhance it with more ‘No Hope & No Change’.  Things are looking up. The only ones apparently having fun are the geniuses in the complicit media.
This presidential election is well on the way to becoming a chaotic mess like no other we’ve seen.  We’ll be faced with nothing but Hobson’s choices. Time to get real, People. Think hard about whom & what you will be voting into office; you owe it to your Grandchildren.
                                        MORT KUFF  © 5-16-2016   

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, April 21, 2016

Letter to the Editor

Good ‘ol, dependable ‘ol, Joe Biden.
You can count on good ‘ol, dependable ‘ol, Joe Biden never to miss an opportunity to keep his big mouth shut.  And, his timing as always, is impeccable.  
Joe, just recently returned from being feted and hosted by PM Netanyahu in our only true ally in all the World, lonely little Israel.  
And while our anti-Semitic, anti-American, devout Muslim Pres. Barack Hussein Obama is in Saudi Arabia prostituting himself and our nation to the Israel+Jew hating Saudi Royal Family - -  and merely hours after we learned the news that some peace-loving, Islamist thugs blew up a bus in Israel, seriously wounding at least 21 innocent Jews - - good ‘ol, dependable ‘ol Joe Biden decided the time was ripe to spew out a litany of things that he believes Israel is doing to make the world a less safe place for themselves and for the United States.  Way to go, Joe, you nitwit.
Good ‘ol, dependable ‘ol Joe chose to deliver his message full of rhetorical gasoline and he chose to throw it onto the raging fire that is the Middle East.  Adding intentional insult to injury, he did it before an audience comprised of 150% Israel-hating, American Jews that call themselves, ‘J-Street’.  Anything to help exacerbate the situation, huh Joe?  You nitwit.
And, this is the Democrat genius waiting in the wings to save the day by jumping into the race for the Presidency, in case both Hillary and Sanders do themselves in with stupidity?     Nitwits, all!

        MORT KUFF  © 4-20-2016

Bookmark and Share