Saturday, July 31, 2010
Ronald Reagan - A Time For Choosing
This Video above is about 4 minutes of Ronald Reagan's speech in support of Barry Goldwater, where he speaks of a rendezvous with destiny.
Listening to a true Conservative, it saddens me to see people like Lindsey Goober Graham running around with moderate views. A new slogan should be broadcast "Dump all RINOs and Fire every Democrat, Now"!
Labels:
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Democrat-Lies,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Holder,
Racist-Liberals,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Ronald-Reagan,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Friday, July 30, 2010
If The Left Wing Continues, Say Farewell To Blue Skies
A chilling montage of political events and issues over the last couple of years. This brings into perspective the danger America currently faces from the Radical and yes, VIOLENT Left Wing Party, with the power. Our constitution is under attack with the blessings of the main stream media.
We must defeat all Democrats and RINO's at every chance in the Voting booth.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
This California Teacher Talks about Illegal Aliens
This should make everyone think, whether you are a NAZI Democrat, Republican or Independent.
This English teacher has phrased it the best I’ve seen yet “Tomatoes and Cheap Labor.”
CHEAP TOMATOES?
“As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:
I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school, which is, designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels.
Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.
Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking a glass of milk and roll — but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them “Putas”, whores and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.
Free medical, free education, free food, daycare etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?
To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.
Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc. For me, I’ll pay more for tomatoes.
We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won’t have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?
It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and worried about “politically correctness” that we don’t have the will to do anything about it.
If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.
CHEAP LABOR? Isn’t that what the whole immigration issue is about?
Business doesn’t want to pay a decent wage.
Consumers don’t want expensive produce.
Government will tell you Americans don’t want the jobs.
But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase “cheap labor” is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as “cheap labor.”
Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an “earned income credit” of up to $3,200 free.
He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.
He qualifies for food stamps.
He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.
His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.
He requires bilingual teachers and books.
He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.
If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer’s expense.
He doesn’t worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.
Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.
He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.
Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.
The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean up.
Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people!
THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY. ‘AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON’T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!’
THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAIN BECAUSE A FEW DON’T CARE.
And I still have to Press '1' For English.
Please pass this on to as many as possible. Immigration legislation is to be considered in 2010. This is important to working Americans, our economy and our American culture and heritage..
This English teacher has phrased it the best I’ve seen yet “Tomatoes and Cheap Labor.”
CHEAP TOMATOES?
“As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:
I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school, which is, designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels.
Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.
Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking a glass of milk and roll — but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)
I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them “Putas”, whores and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.
Free medical, free education, free food, daycare etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?
To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.
Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc. For me, I’ll pay more for tomatoes.
We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won’t have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?
It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and worried about “politically correctness” that we don’t have the will to do anything about it.
If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.
CHEAP LABOR? Isn’t that what the whole immigration issue is about?
Business doesn’t want to pay a decent wage.
Consumers don’t want expensive produce.
Government will tell you Americans don’t want the jobs.
But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase “cheap labor” is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as “cheap labor.”
Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an “earned income credit” of up to $3,200 free.
He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.
He qualifies for food stamps.
He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.
His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.
He requires bilingual teachers and books.
He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.
If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer’s expense.
He doesn’t worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.
Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.
He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.
Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.
The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean up.
Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people!
THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY. ‘AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON’T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!’
THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAIN BECAUSE A FEW DON’T CARE.
And I still have to Press '1' For English.
Please pass this on to as many as possible. Immigration legislation is to be considered in 2010. This is important to working Americans, our economy and our American culture and heritage..
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Friends of the Regime & The Ethics of Killing all White Babies
Watch this Video to see how sick Barry Soetoro's friends really are!
So when lowlifes like Howard Dean call Glenn Beck a Racist for fighting against this
Marxist regime, think about this Video and the New Black Panthers Video HERE.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Howard Dean Supports the Regime
So Howard Dean explodes and shows his tremendous amount of stupidity on FOX. If Lowlife Dean still supports this Regime, then Dean must be a Racist.
If any White person points out someone or something that is Racist in this Regime, then Dean and Liberals call them a Racist.
I guess all White people should cower in a cave, put on some Birkenstocks, watch "The View" and allow our Country to be completely destroyed.
That is not going to happen with our Proud Infidels!
The Video above was submitted by our Conservative friends from Chuck on The Right Side .
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative-Blog,
Franklin-Raines,
Fringe-Media,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Liberals,
spineless-liberal-women,
Stop-Marxism,
The-regime,
Video
Sunday, July 25, 2010
The Regime Looked at Race of Car Dealers For Closures
Apparently we are better off with a BLACK President. Isn't that what Radical Shirley Sherrod said? Ahh, but she is not a Racist. Her comments were taken out of context. Just like this lowlife shiela jackson lee calling Tea Party members, Racists and members of the KKK. Obama has destroyed Race Relations in America. George Bush did more for Race Relations than Barry Soetoro could ever hope to do.
Please read the eye-opening article below by William Tate. It looks very much like Barry, Coward Holder and their crew of Thugs are stomping Race Relations and America at the same time.
Race Played Role in Obama Car Dealer Closures
By William Tate
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
[D]ealerships were retained because they were recently appointed, were key wholesale parts dealers, or were minority- or woman-owned dealerships. [Emphasis added.]
Thus, to meet numbers forced on them by the Obama administration, General Motors and Chrysler were forced to shutter other, potentially more viable, dealerships. The livelihood of potentially tens of thousands of families was thus eliminated simply because their dealerships were not minority- or woman-owned.
As has been widely reported, the Inspector General's study skewered the Obama Gang for strong-arming the companies into closing 2,000 dealerships, costing an estimated 100,000 people their jobs during a recession.
But the news media has ignored key elements of Barofsky's report -- elements that are far more damaging, if possible, to Obama. As we reported earlier in the week, a top Obama official, manufacturing czar and "Auto Team" leader Ron Bloom admitted that the dealerships could have been kept open, saving those jobs, "but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President's mandate for 'shared sacrifice.'"
Barofsky says the administration insisted on the closings even though a GM official told him
that GM would usually save 'not one damn cent' by closing any particular dealership. ... Furthermore, a GM official stated that removing a dealership from the network does not save money for GM -- it might even cost GM money -- and that savings cannot be attributed or assigned to any one dealership.
And a reading of the IG's study makes plain that some dealership closings forced by the administration were based largely on politics.
The report is highly critical of how dealerships were selected for closure, or termination. Barofsky notes that
experts said that while metro areas were oversaturated with GM and Chrysler dealerships and reductions were needed in these areas, this was not the case in rural areas where GM and Chrysler had an advantage over their import competitors. [...]
Although sales volume in small towns may be lower, the cost of operating dealerships in small towns is lower as well. In addition, closing dealerships in small towns could ruin the "historic relationship" that GM has had with residents in small towns and force buyers to drive to metro areas, where there are more competitors. In the worst case, the loss of market share in small and medium-sized markets could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler, the (the Center for Automotive Research) representative said. Representatives from the National Automobile Dealers Association also concurred that dealership terminations would cause GM and Chrysler to lose market share in rural areas. [Emphasis added.]
Nevertheless, as Barofsky notes, "ultimately close to half of all of the GM dealerships identified for termination were in rural areas."
That is where raw, hard, sewage-filled Chicago politics came into play.
Records indicate that in 2008, Obama lost the vote totals in the nation's 1,300 rural counties by nearly 80%.
The Obama administration's insistence on radical numbers of closures ended up shuttering dealerships in those rural areas disproportionately, while dealerships and jobs in metro areas -- Obama's geographical base -- were left open.
Additionally, it has been widely theorized that dealers targeted for closure as a result of Obama's interference were predominantly those who donated campaign contributions to Republicans. Although evidence to date is largely anecdotal, given what we've already reported about the Obama administration's handling of the auto bailout, such speculation does have considerable grounds for support.
While that last point is leaves room for debate, the details contained in the Barofsky report are not. As Barofsky points out, the Obama administration was given an advance copy, and "Treasury [the Obama Treasury Department] might not agree with how the audit's conclusions portray the Auto Team's decision making or with the lessons that SIGTARP has drawn from those facts, but it should be made clear that Treasury has not challenged the essential underlying facts upon which those conclusions are based."
Included among those undisputed facts:
-"[D]ealerships were retained because they were ... minority- or woman-owned dealerships";
-Thousands of jobs were lost, unnecessarily, due specifically to Obama's "mandate for shared sacrifice";
-A disproportionate number of Obama-forced closings were of rural dealerships, in areas unfriendly to Obama, even though such closures could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler.
The media, of course, remain mute about these serious allegations in the Barofsky report. They have limited their coverage to the job loss numbers and tried to place the blame on Treasury Secretary Turbo-Tax Tim Geithner.
For now.
Before long, we'll be reading that it was somehow Bush's fault.
William Tate is an award-winning journalist and author.
Please read the eye-opening article below by William Tate. It looks very much like Barry, Coward Holder and their crew of Thugs are stomping Race Relations and America at the same time.
Race Played Role in Obama Car Dealer Closures
By William Tate
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration's own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout -- closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler -- were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
[D]ealerships were retained because they were recently appointed, were key wholesale parts dealers, or were minority- or woman-owned dealerships. [Emphasis added.]
Thus, to meet numbers forced on them by the Obama administration, General Motors and Chrysler were forced to shutter other, potentially more viable, dealerships. The livelihood of potentially tens of thousands of families was thus eliminated simply because their dealerships were not minority- or woman-owned.
As has been widely reported, the Inspector General's study skewered the Obama Gang for strong-arming the companies into closing 2,000 dealerships, costing an estimated 100,000 people their jobs during a recession.
But the news media has ignored key elements of Barofsky's report -- elements that are far more damaging, if possible, to Obama. As we reported earlier in the week, a top Obama official, manufacturing czar and "Auto Team" leader Ron Bloom admitted that the dealerships could have been kept open, saving those jobs, "but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President's mandate for 'shared sacrifice.'"
Barofsky says the administration insisted on the closings even though a GM official told him
that GM would usually save 'not one damn cent' by closing any particular dealership. ... Furthermore, a GM official stated that removing a dealership from the network does not save money for GM -- it might even cost GM money -- and that savings cannot be attributed or assigned to any one dealership.
And a reading of the IG's study makes plain that some dealership closings forced by the administration were based largely on politics.
The report is highly critical of how dealerships were selected for closure, or termination. Barofsky notes that
experts said that while metro areas were oversaturated with GM and Chrysler dealerships and reductions were needed in these areas, this was not the case in rural areas where GM and Chrysler had an advantage over their import competitors. [...]
Although sales volume in small towns may be lower, the cost of operating dealerships in small towns is lower as well. In addition, closing dealerships in small towns could ruin the "historic relationship" that GM has had with residents in small towns and force buyers to drive to metro areas, where there are more competitors. In the worst case, the loss of market share in small and medium-sized markets could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler, the (the Center for Automotive Research) representative said. Representatives from the National Automobile Dealers Association also concurred that dealership terminations would cause GM and Chrysler to lose market share in rural areas. [Emphasis added.]
Nevertheless, as Barofsky notes, "ultimately close to half of all of the GM dealerships identified for termination were in rural areas."
That is where raw, hard, sewage-filled Chicago politics came into play.
Records indicate that in 2008, Obama lost the vote totals in the nation's 1,300 rural counties by nearly 80%.
The Obama administration's insistence on radical numbers of closures ended up shuttering dealerships in those rural areas disproportionately, while dealerships and jobs in metro areas -- Obama's geographical base -- were left open.
Additionally, it has been widely theorized that dealers targeted for closure as a result of Obama's interference were predominantly those who donated campaign contributions to Republicans. Although evidence to date is largely anecdotal, given what we've already reported about the Obama administration's handling of the auto bailout, such speculation does have considerable grounds for support.
While that last point is leaves room for debate, the details contained in the Barofsky report are not. As Barofsky points out, the Obama administration was given an advance copy, and "Treasury [the Obama Treasury Department] might not agree with how the audit's conclusions portray the Auto Team's decision making or with the lessons that SIGTARP has drawn from those facts, but it should be made clear that Treasury has not challenged the essential underlying facts upon which those conclusions are based."
Included among those undisputed facts:
-"[D]ealerships were retained because they were ... minority- or woman-owned dealerships";
-Thousands of jobs were lost, unnecessarily, due specifically to Obama's "mandate for shared sacrifice";
-A disproportionate number of Obama-forced closings were of rural dealerships, in areas unfriendly to Obama, even though such closures could "jeopardize the return to profitability" for GM and Chrysler.
The media, of course, remain mute about these serious allegations in the Barofsky report. They have limited their coverage to the job loss numbers and tried to place the blame on Treasury Secretary Turbo-Tax Tim Geithner.
For now.
Before long, we'll be reading that it was somehow Bush's fault.
William Tate is an award-winning journalist and author.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Racist-Oprah,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Shariah Law Unconstitutional
To The American People,
I will appreciate your attention and consideration.
The first amendment was not written in stone. It was written on parchment,
and if there is an occurrence when it poses danger to our Constitution, national
security or the safety of people, prudent review and flexibility must be
evaluated to determine its application. Has it not been the case with elimination of
human sacrifice on religious grounds?
Components in Shariah law borders on human sacrifice, more political than
religion. This insipid chauvinistic inserted into Islam is an abomination to human dignity
and has no place in the community of civilized religions!
I the case of the first amendment and Shariah law, defending it will be like
our body's immune system turning on itself. With false hope I wish somebody with
backbone in Congress, will introduce a bill making Shariah law unconstitutional when
in conflict with civil law; nipping it in the bud before it can becoming an issue.
Terrorist, misinterpreters of the Koran and the ACLU will be offended and opposed
to this.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
Please see the Video in the NEXT Post below for more information on Radical Islam or CLICK HERE.
I will appreciate your attention and consideration.
The first amendment was not written in stone. It was written on parchment,
and if there is an occurrence when it poses danger to our Constitution, national
security or the safety of people, prudent review and flexibility must be
evaluated to determine its application. Has it not been the case with elimination of
human sacrifice on religious grounds?
Components in Shariah law borders on human sacrifice, more political than
religion. This insipid chauvinistic inserted into Islam is an abomination to human dignity
and has no place in the community of civilized religions!
I the case of the first amendment and Shariah law, defending it will be like
our body's immune system turning on itself. With false hope I wish somebody with
backbone in Congress, will introduce a bill making Shariah law unconstitutional when
in conflict with civil law; nipping it in the bud before it can becoming an issue.
Terrorist, misinterpreters of the Koran and the ACLU will be offended and opposed
to this.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
Please see the Video in the NEXT Post below for more information on Radical Islam or CLICK HERE.
Know Things About Islam?
Will Liberals across the World ever wake-up to the fact that Radical Islam will destroy them?
Hat Tip to Neil.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrant,
Islam,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Friday, July 23, 2010
Anita MonCrief to File FEC Charges Against Obama Administration
ACORN whistle-blower (HERO) Anita Moncrief held a press conference today and announced that she will press FEC charges against the Obama Administration for the campaign’s illegal coordination with ACORN during the 2008 election.
Labels:
ACORN,
Barry-Soetoro,
Black-Panther-Racist,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Liberal-Fraud,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
Video
Barry Destroys Race Relations
Today I think we should point out to Liberals that they have set America back in Race Relations, by pushing Barry HARVARD Soetoro on us. Soetoro has been a disaster, plain and simple. We have his Thug friends Jesse Jackson, Coward Holder and others just attacking Whites at every turn. Barry supposedly distanced himself, publicly, from that insane Rev. Wright. However, all of Barry's associates seem to be Anti-Semites and anti-White. C'mon, the so-called First Lady goes to NAACP and gives her speeches. What about the "Advancement of American People" instead of "Colored People"? This woman has no class and her contempt for America is very relevant as she is getting power from the Marxist Media .
Below is an excellent article, by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON, on how Obama has hurt Race Relations in America.
America Moves Beyond Race; Will President?
Part below is by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
Weren't we supposed to enter a new age of tolerance with the election of President Barack Obama?
His half-black, half-white ancestry and broad support across racial lines suggested that at last Americans judged each other on the content of our characters — not the color of our skin or our tribal affiliations.
Instead, in just 18 months of the Obama administration, racial discord is growing and relations seem to have been set back a generation. Black voters are galvanizing behind Obama at a time of rapidly falling support. White independents, in contrast, are leaving Obama in droves.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has claimed that the loosely organized Tea Party includes "racist elements." The National Council of La Raza has ripped the state of Arizona for its new anti-illegal alien legislation.
Jesse Jackson characterized aspects of the multimillion-dollar bidding war to acquire basketball superstar LeBron James in terms of masters and slaves. Pundits are arguing whether the fringe racist New Black Panther Party is analogous to the Klan.
In turn, a number of Americans want to know why — nearly a half-century after the Civil Rights Act, affirmative action and Great Society programs — some national lobbying organizations still identify themselves by archaic tribal terms such as "colored people" or "La Raza" ("the race") when it would be taboo for other groups to adopt such racial nomenclature.
Indeed, race seems to be the subtext of almost every contemporary issue, from the soaring deficit and government spending to recent presidential appointments and the enforcement of existing immigration law.
In times of growing deficits, white people are stereotyped as being angry over supposedly paying higher taxes to subsidize minorities, while minorities are stereotyped as being mostly on the receiving end of entitlements.
Why the escalation of racial tension in the supposed post-racial age of Obama?
First, Obama's reputation as a racial healer was largely the creation of the media. In fact, Obama had a number of racially polarizing incidents that probably would have disqualified any other presidential candidate of the past 30 years.
His two-decade apprenticeship at Trinity Church under the racist and anti-Semitic Rev. Jeremiah Wright has never been adequately explained. Obama indulged in racial stereotyping himself when he wrote off the white lower-middle class of Pennsylvania as clueless zealots clinging to their guns, religion and xenophobia.
Obama also characterized his grandmother as a "typical white person" when he implied that her supposed fear of young black males symbolizes the prejudices of the entire white community.
Michelle Obama did not help things when, in clumsy fashion, she indicted America as "just downright mean" — a nation she had not been proud of in her adult life until it embraced the hope and change represented by her husband's candidacy.
Such campaign trash talk did not stop during the first 18 months of the Obama presidency. The race-baiting Van Jones — the short-lived presidential advisor on "green jobs" — should never have been appointed. Then, the president himself criticized Cambridge, Mass., police for acting "stupidly" when they arrested his friend, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates.
Then there was the outburst of Attorney General Eric Holder, who blasted America as "a nation of cowards" for not talking more about race on his terms. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was almost obsessive in self-referencing herself as a "Latina." She also suggested that her racial background and experiences made her "wise" in a way white male colleagues could never be.
Recently, Obama appealed to voters along exclusionary race and gender lines — not traditional political allegiances — when he called upon "the young people, African-Americans, Latinos and women, who powered our victory in 2008."
Yet the country passed the old white/black divide years ago. We are a racially diverse society of Asians, blacks, Hispanics, whites and mixtures of all that and more. In a world of conservative Cubans and liberal whites, race is no longer necessarily a guide to politics.
Who now, exactly, is the racial "Other" deserving of special consideration in hiring and education? A half-Punjabi immigrant whose father owns 500 acres? A three-quarters Puerto Rican who just arrived in New York? A Korean-American son of an orthodontist? The African-American children of a Cabinet official?
The more the president appeals to his base in racial terms, the more his appointees identify themselves as members of a particular tribe, and the more political issues are framed by racial divisions, so all the more such racial obsession creates a backlash among the racially diverse American people.
America has largely moved beyond race. Tragically, our president and a host of his supportive special interests have not.
Written by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
Below is an excellent article, by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON, on how Obama has hurt Race Relations in America.
America Moves Beyond Race; Will President?
Part below is by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
Weren't we supposed to enter a new age of tolerance with the election of President Barack Obama?
His half-black, half-white ancestry and broad support across racial lines suggested that at last Americans judged each other on the content of our characters — not the color of our skin or our tribal affiliations.
Instead, in just 18 months of the Obama administration, racial discord is growing and relations seem to have been set back a generation. Black voters are galvanizing behind Obama at a time of rapidly falling support. White independents, in contrast, are leaving Obama in droves.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has claimed that the loosely organized Tea Party includes "racist elements." The National Council of La Raza has ripped the state of Arizona for its new anti-illegal alien legislation.
Jesse Jackson characterized aspects of the multimillion-dollar bidding war to acquire basketball superstar LeBron James in terms of masters and slaves. Pundits are arguing whether the fringe racist New Black Panther Party is analogous to the Klan.
In turn, a number of Americans want to know why — nearly a half-century after the Civil Rights Act, affirmative action and Great Society programs — some national lobbying organizations still identify themselves by archaic tribal terms such as "colored people" or "La Raza" ("the race") when it would be taboo for other groups to adopt such racial nomenclature.
Indeed, race seems to be the subtext of almost every contemporary issue, from the soaring deficit and government spending to recent presidential appointments and the enforcement of existing immigration law.
In times of growing deficits, white people are stereotyped as being angry over supposedly paying higher taxes to subsidize minorities, while minorities are stereotyped as being mostly on the receiving end of entitlements.
Why the escalation of racial tension in the supposed post-racial age of Obama?
First, Obama's reputation as a racial healer was largely the creation of the media. In fact, Obama had a number of racially polarizing incidents that probably would have disqualified any other presidential candidate of the past 30 years.
His two-decade apprenticeship at Trinity Church under the racist and anti-Semitic Rev. Jeremiah Wright has never been adequately explained. Obama indulged in racial stereotyping himself when he wrote off the white lower-middle class of Pennsylvania as clueless zealots clinging to their guns, religion and xenophobia.
Obama also characterized his grandmother as a "typical white person" when he implied that her supposed fear of young black males symbolizes the prejudices of the entire white community.
Michelle Obama did not help things when, in clumsy fashion, she indicted America as "just downright mean" — a nation she had not been proud of in her adult life until it embraced the hope and change represented by her husband's candidacy.
Such campaign trash talk did not stop during the first 18 months of the Obama presidency. The race-baiting Van Jones — the short-lived presidential advisor on "green jobs" — should never have been appointed. Then, the president himself criticized Cambridge, Mass., police for acting "stupidly" when they arrested his friend, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates.
Then there was the outburst of Attorney General Eric Holder, who blasted America as "a nation of cowards" for not talking more about race on his terms. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was almost obsessive in self-referencing herself as a "Latina." She also suggested that her racial background and experiences made her "wise" in a way white male colleagues could never be.
Recently, Obama appealed to voters along exclusionary race and gender lines — not traditional political allegiances — when he called upon "the young people, African-Americans, Latinos and women, who powered our victory in 2008."
Yet the country passed the old white/black divide years ago. We are a racially diverse society of Asians, blacks, Hispanics, whites and mixtures of all that and more. In a world of conservative Cubans and liberal whites, race is no longer necessarily a guide to politics.
Who now, exactly, is the racial "Other" deserving of special consideration in hiring and education? A half-Punjabi immigrant whose father owns 500 acres? A three-quarters Puerto Rican who just arrived in New York? A Korean-American son of an orthodontist? The African-American children of a Cabinet official?
The more the president appeals to his base in racial terms, the more his appointees identify themselves as members of a particular tribe, and the more political issues are framed by racial divisions, so all the more such racial obsession creates a backlash among the racially diverse American people.
America has largely moved beyond race. Tragically, our president and a host of his supportive special interests have not.
Written by VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Stop Marxism & Keep Shirley Sherrod Unemployed
Shirley Sherrod is now the Victim! Yes that is Marxism and Black Theology at it's best. She was taken out of context with her Racist remarks. Yes, when a Racist Liberal gets caught, it is always "out of context".
Oh, so the real victim, the White Farmer is fine and dandy now so we have to let Sherrod off the hook for being a stinking racist? That is the same agenda the Left Wing Nazis use with Roman Polanski. Oh the Victim said she does not want to press charges so let low life Rapist Polanski off the hook. In fact Rapist Polanski is a cult hero with many Hollywood Crackpots and their Kool-Aid drinkers.
Ever think maybe that WHITE Farmer did not want Barry and his Thugs coming after him? Of course the Farmer does not want the SEIU, ACORN and Coward Eric Holders's New Black Panthers showing up on the farm. Look what the Chicago Gang did to Sarah Palin with lawsuits? The White Farmer might not have “his own people” (Sherrod's words for white people to go to their own people) to help him.
We must Stop Marxism and Black Theology from creeping in further to our Government.
Let's get graphic as we have to make a point. What if that was one of your family members or friends at the Fort Hood Massacre? Again, that is Political Correctness and Marxism terrorizing America.
Sherrod is now asking “WHAT CAN I GET”? She wants to hammer Breitbart. Andrew Breitbart is an American Hero for all he has done. Sherod is still a lowlife Racist left Winger!
Sherrod learned her lesson? Ya, it is okay for a high paid, Government Employee to say “we are better off with a Black President”. That Racist statement may have been the gravy to get her a new job in the Obama Regime.
Of course we are for Freedom of Speech. Yet when a Government Official is making obvious Racist Statements and getting paid with our Tax Dollars. She had to go!
Oh, so the real victim, the White Farmer is fine and dandy now so we have to let Sherrod off the hook for being a stinking racist? That is the same agenda the Left Wing Nazis use with Roman Polanski. Oh the Victim said she does not want to press charges so let low life Rapist Polanski off the hook. In fact Rapist Polanski is a cult hero with many Hollywood Crackpots and their Kool-Aid drinkers.
Ever think maybe that WHITE Farmer did not want Barry and his Thugs coming after him? Of course the Farmer does not want the SEIU, ACORN and Coward Eric Holders's New Black Panthers showing up on the farm. Look what the Chicago Gang did to Sarah Palin with lawsuits? The White Farmer might not have “his own people” (Sherrod's words for white people to go to their own people) to help him.
We must Stop Marxism and Black Theology from creeping in further to our Government.
Let's get graphic as we have to make a point. What if that was one of your family members or friends at the Fort Hood Massacre? Again, that is Political Correctness and Marxism terrorizing America.
Sherrod is now asking “WHAT CAN I GET”? She wants to hammer Breitbart. Andrew Breitbart is an American Hero for all he has done. Sherod is still a lowlife Racist left Winger!
Sherrod learned her lesson? Ya, it is okay for a high paid, Government Employee to say “we are better off with a Black President”. That Racist statement may have been the gravy to get her a new job in the Obama Regime.
Of course we are for Freedom of Speech. Yet when a Government Official is making obvious Racist Statements and getting paid with our Tax Dollars. She had to go!
Labels:
Andrew-Breitbart,
black-farmers-fraud,
Black-Panther-Racist,
Black-theology,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Political-Correctness,
Racist-Liberals,
shirley-sherrod
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
A different side of Frank Sinatra
Good ole Frankie. He did it his way.
Francis Albert Sinatra (1915-1998) may have been one of America 's most famous Italian Catholics, but he kept the Jewish people and the State of Israel close to his heart, manifesting life-long commitments to fighting anti-Semitism and to activism on behalf of Israel . Sinatra stepped forward in the early 1940s, when big names were needed to rouse America into saving Europe's remaining Jews, and he sang at an "Action for Palestine" rally (1947). He sat on the board of trustees of the Simon Wiesenthal Center ; and he donated over $1 million to Jerusalem 's Hebrew University , which honored him by dedicating the Frank Sinatra International Student Center. (The Center made heartbreaking headlines when terrorists bombed it in 2002, killing nine people.) As the result of his support for the Jewish State, his movies and records were banned in some Arab countries
Sinatra helped Teddy Kollek, later the long-serving mayor of Jerusalem but then a member of the Haganah, by serving as a $1 million money-runner that helped Israel win the war. The Copacabana Club, which was very much run and controlled by the same Luciano-related New York mafia crowd with whom Sinatra had become enmeshed, happened to be next door to the hotel out of which Haganah members were operating. In his autobiography, Kollek relates how, trying in March 1948 to circumvent an arms boycott imposed by President Harry Truman on the Jewish fighters in Eretz Yisroel, he needed to smuggle about $1 million in cash to an Irish ship captain docked in the Port of New York. The young Kollek spotted Sinatra at the bar and, afraid of being intercepted by federal agents, asked for help. In the early hours of the morning, the singer went out the back door with the money in a paper bag and successfully delivered it to the pier.
The origins of Sinatra's love affair with the Jewish people are not clear but, for years, the Hollywood icon wore a small mezuzah around his neck, a gift from Mrs. Golden, an elderly Jewish neighbor who cared for him during his boyhood in Hoboken, N.J. (years later, he honored her by purchasing a quarter million dollars' worth of Israel bonds). He protected his Jewish friends, once responding to an anti-Semitic remark at a party by simply punching the offender. Time magazine reported that Sinatra walked out on the christening of his own son when the priest refused to allow a Jewish friend to be the godfather. As late as 1979, he raged over the fact that a Palm Springs cemetery official in California declared that he could not arrange the burial of a deceased Jewish friend over the Thanksgiving holiday; Sinatra again -- threatened to punch him in the nose.
Sinatra famously played the role of a Jewish pilot in Cast a Giant Shadow, the 1966 film filmed in Israel and starring friend Kirk Douglas as Mickey Marcus, the Jewish-American colonel who fought and died in Israel's war for independence (Sinatra dive-bombs Egyptian tanks with seltzer bottles!) He donated his salary for the part to the Arab-Israeli Youth Center in Nazareth , and he also made a significant contribution to the making of Genocide, a film about the Holocaust, and helped raise funds for the film. Less known is Sinatra in Israel (1962), a short 45-minute featurette he made in which he sang In the Still of the Night and Without a Song. He also starred in The House I Live In (1945), a ten-minute short film made to oppose anti-Semitism at the end of World War II, which received an Honorary Academy Award and a special Golden Globe award.
Hat Tip to Neil
Francis Albert Sinatra (1915-1998) may have been one of America 's most famous Italian Catholics, but he kept the Jewish people and the State of Israel close to his heart, manifesting life-long commitments to fighting anti-Semitism and to activism on behalf of Israel . Sinatra stepped forward in the early 1940s, when big names were needed to rouse America into saving Europe's remaining Jews, and he sang at an "Action for Palestine" rally (1947). He sat on the board of trustees of the Simon Wiesenthal Center ; and he donated over $1 million to Jerusalem 's Hebrew University , which honored him by dedicating the Frank Sinatra International Student Center. (The Center made heartbreaking headlines when terrorists bombed it in 2002, killing nine people.) As the result of his support for the Jewish State, his movies and records were banned in some Arab countries
Sinatra helped Teddy Kollek, later the long-serving mayor of Jerusalem but then a member of the Haganah, by serving as a $1 million money-runner that helped Israel win the war. The Copacabana Club, which was very much run and controlled by the same Luciano-related New York mafia crowd with whom Sinatra had become enmeshed, happened to be next door to the hotel out of which Haganah members were operating. In his autobiography, Kollek relates how, trying in March 1948 to circumvent an arms boycott imposed by President Harry Truman on the Jewish fighters in Eretz Yisroel, he needed to smuggle about $1 million in cash to an Irish ship captain docked in the Port of New York. The young Kollek spotted Sinatra at the bar and, afraid of being intercepted by federal agents, asked for help. In the early hours of the morning, the singer went out the back door with the money in a paper bag and successfully delivered it to the pier.
The origins of Sinatra's love affair with the Jewish people are not clear but, for years, the Hollywood icon wore a small mezuzah around his neck, a gift from Mrs. Golden, an elderly Jewish neighbor who cared for him during his boyhood in Hoboken, N.J. (years later, he honored her by purchasing a quarter million dollars' worth of Israel bonds). He protected his Jewish friends, once responding to an anti-Semitic remark at a party by simply punching the offender. Time magazine reported that Sinatra walked out on the christening of his own son when the priest refused to allow a Jewish friend to be the godfather. As late as 1979, he raged over the fact that a Palm Springs cemetery official in California declared that he could not arrange the burial of a deceased Jewish friend over the Thanksgiving holiday; Sinatra again -- threatened to punch him in the nose.
Sinatra famously played the role of a Jewish pilot in Cast a Giant Shadow, the 1966 film filmed in Israel and starring friend Kirk Douglas as Mickey Marcus, the Jewish-American colonel who fought and died in Israel's war for independence (Sinatra dive-bombs Egyptian tanks with seltzer bottles!) He donated his salary for the part to the Arab-Israeli Youth Center in Nazareth , and he also made a significant contribution to the making of Genocide, a film about the Holocaust, and helped raise funds for the film. Less known is Sinatra in Israel (1962), a short 45-minute featurette he made in which he sang In the Still of the Night and Without a Song. He also starred in The House I Live In (1945), a ten-minute short film made to oppose anti-Semitism at the end of World War II, which received an Honorary Academy Award and a special Golden Globe award.
Hat Tip to Neil
Labels:
Anti-Semite-Liberal,
anti-Semitism,
Conservatism,
Conservative-Blog,
Frank-Sinatra,
Nazi-Democrat,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
Stop-Marxism
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Obama's AmeriKa is Thriving?
It seems like everyday is a Left Wing massacre on our Country. Look at the rashid khalidi drama. The LA Times sat on their information all the while knowing khalidi and Barry Soetoro had Anti-Semite connections. Why did the People of America elect this HARVARD Radical?
Here is a brief description below on problems stemming from Left Wingers destruction to our Country.
This portion below is written by Ken Huber.
What Has America Become?
Lets see:
- if we lie to the Congress, it's a felony and if the congress lies to us it's just politics;
- if we dislike a black person, we're racist and if a black dislikes whites, it's their 1st Amendment right;
- the government spends millions to rehabilitate criminals and they do almost nothing for the victims;
- in public schools you can teach that homosexuality is OK, but you better not use the word God in the process;
- you can kill an unborn child, but it's wrong to execute a mass murderer;
- we don't burn books in America, we now rewrite them;
- we got rid of the community and socialist threat by renaming them progressives;
- we are unable to close our border with Mexico, but have no problem protecting the 38th parallel in Korea;
- if you protest against Pres. Obama's policies you're a terrorist, but if you you
- burned an American flag or George Bush in effigy it was your 1st Amendment right.
- we have eliminated all criminals in America, they are now called sick people*
- we can use a human fetus for medical research, but it's wrong to use an animal.
- We take money from those who work hard for it and give it to those who don't want to work;
- we all support the Constitution, but only when it supports our political ideology;
- we still have freedom of speech, but only if we are being politically correct;
- parenting has been replaced with Ritalin and video games;
- the land of opportunity is now the land of hand outs
- And how do we handle a major crisis today? The government appoints a committee to determine who's at fault, then threatens them, passes a law, raises our taxes [and] tells us the problem is solved so they can get back to their reelection campaign.
What has happened to the land of the free and home of the brave?
Written by Ken Huber
Hat Tip to Mr. I
Monday, July 19, 2010
Bill Randall, Candidate for the NC-13 Seat Slams the NAACP
An African American GOP candidate slams the NAACP on their hypocrisy!
Bill Randall, candidate for the NC-13 seat defends the Tea Party and asks the NAACP to present some evidence that their is racism in the Tea Party Movement. Of course this ploy by the NAACP is a Marxist weapon. Barry Soetoro uses these same tactics every day to defend his failure of a Presidency.
Labels:
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Marxist-Left-Wing,
NAACP-Radicals,
RACE-BAITERS,
Racist-Liberals,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Ex-prosecutor: Obama's Kenyan activities may be 'criminal'
Another shocking and eye opening article on Obama and Odinga. The Racist
fringe Media totally ignored this connection during the election. I believe Sean Hannity and Mark Levin were some of the few to expose this radical connection. Thanks to World Net Daily, they have more to say on this subject below.
This portion below is from © 2010 WorldNetDaily
In a new best-selling book connecting Islam and Obama-style socialism, a former top terrorism prosecutor chides the national media for failing to investigate Barack Obama's "borderline criminal" activities in Kenya as a U.S. senator.
Andrew C. McCarthy, the former U.S. attorney who investigated the American embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya, charges that Obama interfered in Kenya's internal politics possibly in violation of the Logan Act.
The centuries-old law bars Americans who are "without authority of the United States" from conducting relations "with any foreign government ... in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States."
In "The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America," McCarthy says Obama undermined U.S. relations with a strong antiterrorism ally in an African region where al-Qaida operates. In 2006, he details in the book how Obama campaigned for a pro-communist candidate running against Nairobi's pro-American government – "in outrageous contravention of U.S. policy and, probably, federal law."
Obama spent six days barnstorming the Kenyan countryside in support of Raila Odinga, the socialist Luo who was seeking the presidency. Appearing with Odinga at campaign stops, Obama gave speeches accusing the sitting Kenyan president of being corrupt and oppressive, leaving the masses in poverty.
Obama's interference "was more than reckless," McCarthy writes. "It was borderline criminal (and that's being generous)."
Earlier, Odinga had visited Obama in the U.S. – in 2004, 2005 and 2006 – and Obama had sent an adviser, Mark Lippert, to Kenya in early 2006 to plan a trip by the senator timed to coincide with Odinga's campaign.
Read about the plans Islam has for America!
McCarthy notes that Obama and Odinga, who named one of his children after Fidel Castro, are "leftist soulmates" whose families go way back. Their fathers belonged to the same Luo tribe – and both Barack Hussein Obama Sr. and the elder Oginga Odinga worked inside the Kenyan government as communist agitators.
There is also an Islamist connection.
On Aug. 29, 2007, Raila Odinga signed a secret Memorandum of Understanding with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya. In exchange for Muslim support, Odinga agreed, among other things, to:
Rewrite the national constitution to install Shariah as the law in all "Muslim declared regions."
Elevate Islam as "the only true religion" and give Islamic leaders an "oversight role to monitor activities of ALL other religions."
Establish Shariah courts in every Kenyan divisional headquarters.
Ban Christian proselytism.
Fire the police commissioner for "allow[ing] himself to be used by heathens and Zionists" to oppress Muslims.
Adopt Islamic dress codes for women.
Ban alcohol and pork.
Even with strong Muslim backing, Odinga (who does business with a wealthy Saudi donor to Osama bin Laden) was defeated in the December 2007 election. But he accused the incumbent president of rigging the vote and incited his supporters to riot in protest.
Over the next month, some 1,500 Kenyans were killed and more than 500,000 displaced – with most of the violence led by Muslims, who set churches ablaze and hacked Christians to death with machetes.
All the while, Odinga was in regular communications with Obama, who publicly called for an end to the violence.
"Odinga's strategy, the extortion strategy of Islamist intimidation, worked to a fare-thee-well," McCarthy notes in his book. To appease his angry mob of supporters, he was named prime minister and allowed to share power with the president.
"With Obama's helping hand, leftists and Islamists had combined forces to overwhelm a constitutional democracy," McCarthy says, while decrying the national media's "stubborn disinterest" in the "stunning" chain of events.
The same alliance can be seen in the U.S., he says, as the Obama administration reaches out to the radical Muslim Brotherhood, which, according to the FBI, has a plan to infiltrate and sabotage the U.S. from within. Obama and other Alinsky "revolutionaries" are carrying out a similar plan, he maintains.
McCarthy says that while there's no evidence Obama is a practicing Muslim, he shares Muslim Brotherhood hatred for America and "the Muslim Brotherhood's sabotage strategy."
McCarthy says the administration ignores incontrovertible evidence tying Muslim Brotherhood front groups in America to Hamas and other terrorist groups. One of them, he notes, is the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which claims to be a benign civil-rights organization.
But he says the recent Holy Land Foundation trial – "and the eye-popping publication of 'Muslim Mafia'" – have exposed CAIR "as a farce." Quoting from "Muslim Mafia" – which he adds is an "important book" – the former top terrorism prosecutor further litigates the case against CAIR's "Hamas-tainted leaders."
In another bombshell, McCarthy reveals that he was dropped from the White House Christmas card list following his criticism of the Bush administration's purging of the words "jihad" and "Islamic terrorism" from the official military and homeland-security lexicon.
Like President Bush before him, he says President Obama fails to grasp that Islam is not a "religion of peace" but "a huge part of the problem in combating 'violent extremism,'" which is the new euphemism for Islamic terrorism.
"To be sure, the same ground was staked out by his predecessor, President Bush," McCarthy argues. "They are (both) wrong."
"The need to deal with Islam is unavoidable," he adds, "not because it's an asset, but because it's a liability that can't be written off."
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
fringe Media totally ignored this connection during the election. I believe Sean Hannity and Mark Levin were some of the few to expose this radical connection. Thanks to World Net Daily, they have more to say on this subject below.
This portion below is from © 2010 WorldNetDaily
McCarthy says Obama's foreign dealings as senator possibly illegal
In a new best-selling book connecting Islam and Obama-style socialism, a former top terrorism prosecutor chides the national media for failing to investigate Barack Obama's "borderline criminal" activities in Kenya as a U.S. senator.
Andrew C. McCarthy, the former U.S. attorney who investigated the American embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya, charges that Obama interfered in Kenya's internal politics possibly in violation of the Logan Act.
The centuries-old law bars Americans who are "without authority of the United States" from conducting relations "with any foreign government ... in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States."
In "The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America," McCarthy says Obama undermined U.S. relations with a strong antiterrorism ally in an African region where al-Qaida operates. In 2006, he details in the book how Obama campaigned for a pro-communist candidate running against Nairobi's pro-American government – "in outrageous contravention of U.S. policy and, probably, federal law."
Obama spent six days barnstorming the Kenyan countryside in support of Raila Odinga, the socialist Luo who was seeking the presidency. Appearing with Odinga at campaign stops, Obama gave speeches accusing the sitting Kenyan president of being corrupt and oppressive, leaving the masses in poverty.
Obama's interference "was more than reckless," McCarthy writes. "It was borderline criminal (and that's being generous)."
Earlier, Odinga had visited Obama in the U.S. – in 2004, 2005 and 2006 – and Obama had sent an adviser, Mark Lippert, to Kenya in early 2006 to plan a trip by the senator timed to coincide with Odinga's campaign.
Read about the plans Islam has for America!
McCarthy notes that Obama and Odinga, who named one of his children after Fidel Castro, are "leftist soulmates" whose families go way back. Their fathers belonged to the same Luo tribe – and both Barack Hussein Obama Sr. and the elder Oginga Odinga worked inside the Kenyan government as communist agitators.
There is also an Islamist connection.
On Aug. 29, 2007, Raila Odinga signed a secret Memorandum of Understanding with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum of Kenya. In exchange for Muslim support, Odinga agreed, among other things, to:
Rewrite the national constitution to install Shariah as the law in all "Muslim declared regions."
Elevate Islam as "the only true religion" and give Islamic leaders an "oversight role to monitor activities of ALL other religions."
Establish Shariah courts in every Kenyan divisional headquarters.
Ban Christian proselytism.
Fire the police commissioner for "allow[ing] himself to be used by heathens and Zionists" to oppress Muslims.
Adopt Islamic dress codes for women.
Ban alcohol and pork.
Even with strong Muslim backing, Odinga (who does business with a wealthy Saudi donor to Osama bin Laden) was defeated in the December 2007 election. But he accused the incumbent president of rigging the vote and incited his supporters to riot in protest.
Over the next month, some 1,500 Kenyans were killed and more than 500,000 displaced – with most of the violence led by Muslims, who set churches ablaze and hacked Christians to death with machetes.
All the while, Odinga was in regular communications with Obama, who publicly called for an end to the violence.
"Odinga's strategy, the extortion strategy of Islamist intimidation, worked to a fare-thee-well," McCarthy notes in his book. To appease his angry mob of supporters, he was named prime minister and allowed to share power with the president.
"With Obama's helping hand, leftists and Islamists had combined forces to overwhelm a constitutional democracy," McCarthy says, while decrying the national media's "stubborn disinterest" in the "stunning" chain of events.
The same alliance can be seen in the U.S., he says, as the Obama administration reaches out to the radical Muslim Brotherhood, which, according to the FBI, has a plan to infiltrate and sabotage the U.S. from within. Obama and other Alinsky "revolutionaries" are carrying out a similar plan, he maintains.
McCarthy says that while there's no evidence Obama is a practicing Muslim, he shares Muslim Brotherhood hatred for America and "the Muslim Brotherhood's sabotage strategy."
McCarthy says the administration ignores incontrovertible evidence tying Muslim Brotherhood front groups in America to Hamas and other terrorist groups. One of them, he notes, is the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which claims to be a benign civil-rights organization.
But he says the recent Holy Land Foundation trial – "and the eye-popping publication of 'Muslim Mafia'" – have exposed CAIR "as a farce." Quoting from "Muslim Mafia" – which he adds is an "important book" – the former top terrorism prosecutor further litigates the case against CAIR's "Hamas-tainted leaders."
In another bombshell, McCarthy reveals that he was dropped from the White House Christmas card list following his criticism of the Bush administration's purging of the words "jihad" and "Islamic terrorism" from the official military and homeland-security lexicon.
Like President Bush before him, he says President Obama fails to grasp that Islam is not a "religion of peace" but "a huge part of the problem in combating 'violent extremism,'" which is the new euphemism for Islamic terrorism.
"To be sure, the same ground was staked out by his predecessor, President Bush," McCarthy argues. "They are (both) wrong."
"The need to deal with Islam is unavoidable," he adds, "not because it's an asset, but because it's a liability that can't be written off."
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Fringe-Media,
Obama-Kenya,
Odinga,
Racist-Democrats,
Radical-Islam,
Stop-Marxism,
Stop-Radical-Islam
Saturday, July 17, 2010
Missouri NAACP Rep said Uncle Tom Deserved Beating
This radical left winger, NAACP Representative, mentions this in the Video above:
Back in the day, we used to call someone like that, and I want to remind you, uh, when this incident occurred, I was really struck by a front page picture of this guy, which we called, a Negro, i mean that we call him a Negro in the fact that he works for not for our people but against our people. In the old days, we call him an Uncle Tom.
This lowlife NAACP clown wants to hold Black people down. He does not want free thinking, independent Black people.
Consider what a Real American Hero, Allen West said back in March. I am paraphrasing a bit.
Allen West mentioned Reid’s comments referencing “negro talk” is just indicative of the true thoughts of elitist liberals, and the Democratic party, The Democrats have thought this toward black Americans and hence held them down. The history of the Democrat party is one of slavery, secession, segregation, and now socialism.
This type of socialism was born from the Johnson Great Society programs that have castigated blacks as victims needing government dependency. Just look at the city of Detroit to ascertain what liberal social welfare policies have produced for the inner city, making it the new plantation for black Americans.
The Ku Klux Klan was birthed by the Democrats as a terrorist wing to intimidate blacks, and whites, who sought to promote economic and education independence and social justice for blacks.
Labels:
Allen-West,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Democrat-Lies,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Harry-Reid,
NAACP-Radical,
Racist-Democrats,
Racist-Liberals,
Radical-Left-Wing-Nazis,
Veterans,
Video
Friday, July 16, 2010
Barry Soetoro & Democrats Caused This Disaster
Explosive Audio Unearthed! After the Sub-Prime Crisis already started in 2007 Obama says Sub Prime Mortgages that gave houses to people WHO COULDN'T AFFORD THEM was a GOOD IDEA! Also involved where many Obama cronies and the leader Franklin Raines made huge profits.
Even as it was destroying our economy Obama thinks giving people mortgages who couldn't afford them was a good idea. Then he says spreading the bad debt throughout the financial system was good "in theory" (is Marxism good in Theory to a Chicago Thug?). Obama went as far as to sue Citibank Under Community Reinvestment Modernization Act (CRA) to force it to make Bad Loans.
“I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.” — Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007
Labels:
ACORN,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Franklin-Raines,
Jimmy-Carter-Failure,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Stop-Marxism,
Sub-Prime-Caused-by-Democrats,
Video
Nick DiPaolo on Dennis Miller's Show
Labels:
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Nick-DiPaolo,
No-Political-Correctness,
Political-Correctness,
Support-Our-Troops,
Video
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Unlawful Felonious Intruders
Did you ever have an uninvited guest crash your party; drink all your booze; eat all your food; insult your other guests and swipe some of your silverware?
What do you think Arizona is saying to the Obama administration with the law they just passed? In turn they are told it's against the law to lock your door.
Anyone against that law is ignorant of its content, or intentionally misinterpreting it for political reasons!
What do you think Arizona is saying to the Obama administration with the law they just passed? In turn they are told it's against the law to lock your door.
Anyone against that law is ignorant of its content, or intentionally misinterpreting it for political reasons!
Labels:
Arizona,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrant,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberal-Racist,
Liberals-Lie,
Stop-Marxism
Black Panther Wants to "Kill White Babies" & "Kill Some Crackers"
We are tired of the fringe MSM laying down like the snakes that they are. This story should have blasted across America for the past 2 years.
The Coward Eric Holder let this case drop and it shows the true racist that he is.
This regime must be sent packing as the longer they stay, the more damage they do.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Black-Panther-Racist,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Fire-Barry,
Fire-Holder,
Fringe-Media,
Left-Wing-Marxists,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Video
Planned Parenthood Reveals Startling Discrepancy
Please read this important report below. Whether you support abortion or not, this affects you! Out Tax dollars are being thrown at these liberal based programs and helping to destroy America. The Marxist Enemy within, is bringing us down financing.
GAO Report on Planned Parenthood Reveals Startling Discrepancy
Contact: Katie Walker, American Life League, 540-659-4942
WASHINGTON, /Christian Newswire/ -- "American Life League's STOP Planned Parenthood project analyzed a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office on federal tax money funneled into Planned Parenthood," announced American Life League President Judie Brown.
According to the GAO report, Planned Parenthood Federation of America audits show the organization spent only $657.1 million between 2002 and 2008 from federal government grants and programs when the abortion behemoth's annual reports show it took in $2 billion from government grants and programs during the same time period.
"That leaves $1.3 billion unaccounted for. That's not pocket change," said STOPP national director Rita Diller. "Why the discrepancy? These numbers don't add up and from an organization with a track record like Planned Parenthood's, the American people deserve an explanation."
The report was requested by 31 U.S. senators and representatives. It is the first of its kind since the 2001 figures released by the GAO in 2003. STOPP notes that Planned Parenthood has other sources of government funding - state and local - and that the GAO report for 2001 shows that PPFA expenditures of federal money accounted for 79 percent of its government income. The new report shows PPFA expenditures of federal money comprising an average of only 32 percent of its government income from 2002 through 2008.
"It is simply not believable such a large amount of its funding is from local and state sources," Diller said
Additionally, in just two weeks, Planned Parenthood will complete its 2009-2010 fiscal year. Yet it still has not released its annual report for its 2008-2009 fiscal year.
"So breaking down the situation," Diller said, "At a time when the majority of Americans consider themselves pro-life, Planned Parenthood rakes in over two billion of our tax dollars, inconsistently reports how they spent our tax money and then admits to killing 1,803,302 preborn babies between 2002 and 2008 alone."
"A growing number of Americans are fed up. It's time to defund Planned Parenthood."
American Life League was cofounded in 1979 by Judie Brown. It is the largest grassroots Catholic pro-life organization in the United States and is committed to the protection of all innocent human beings from the moment of creation to natural death. For more information or press inquiries, please contact Katie Walker at 540.659.4942.
GAO Report on Planned Parenthood Reveals Startling Discrepancy
Contact: Katie Walker, American Life League, 540-659-4942
WASHINGTON, /Christian Newswire/ -- "American Life League's STOP Planned Parenthood project analyzed a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office on federal tax money funneled into Planned Parenthood," announced American Life League President Judie Brown.
According to the GAO report, Planned Parenthood Federation of America audits show the organization spent only $657.1 million between 2002 and 2008 from federal government grants and programs when the abortion behemoth's annual reports show it took in $2 billion from government grants and programs during the same time period.
"That leaves $1.3 billion unaccounted for. That's not pocket change," said STOPP national director Rita Diller. "Why the discrepancy? These numbers don't add up and from an organization with a track record like Planned Parenthood's, the American people deserve an explanation."
The report was requested by 31 U.S. senators and representatives. It is the first of its kind since the 2001 figures released by the GAO in 2003. STOPP notes that Planned Parenthood has other sources of government funding - state and local - and that the GAO report for 2001 shows that PPFA expenditures of federal money accounted for 79 percent of its government income. The new report shows PPFA expenditures of federal money comprising an average of only 32 percent of its government income from 2002 through 2008.
"It is simply not believable such a large amount of its funding is from local and state sources," Diller said
Additionally, in just two weeks, Planned Parenthood will complete its 2009-2010 fiscal year. Yet it still has not released its annual report for its 2008-2009 fiscal year.
"So breaking down the situation," Diller said, "At a time when the majority of Americans consider themselves pro-life, Planned Parenthood rakes in over two billion of our tax dollars, inconsistently reports how they spent our tax money and then admits to killing 1,803,302 preborn babies between 2002 and 2008 alone."
"A growing number of Americans are fed up. It's time to defund Planned Parenthood."
American Life League was cofounded in 1979 by Judie Brown. It is the largest grassroots Catholic pro-life organization in the United States and is committed to the protection of all innocent human beings from the moment of creation to natural death. For more information or press inquiries, please contact Katie Walker at 540.659.4942.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Never Trust a Man With a Marxist Mentor
FOX Economist Gasparino on Obama: Never Trust a Man With a Marxist Mentor.
This is a short and sweet Video that says it all. I want to get back to all the Companies that supported Obama HARVARD and they knew Soetoro's position. They knew Soetoro was anti-Business and ran with Thugs who are all Anti-American, Anti-White and Anti-Semitic.
Labels:
Anti-America,
Anti-Semite-Liberal,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Stop-Marxism,
Video
Allen West to Hold Townhall Meeting
Allen West, A True American Hero and Patriot
For information about Allen West, CLICK HERE.
Townhall Meeting July 15th at 6 pm!
You are invited to have a voice in this upcoming election
Please Join
ALLEN WEST For Congress
For a Townhall Meeting on Education, the Economy, and other Local Issues
When: Thursday, July 15th, 2010
at 6:00 pm
Where: Fort Lauderdale Christian School
in the Gymnasium
6330 NW 31st Ave, Fort Lauderdale FL 33309
For more information, please contact gowest@allenwestforcongress.com
or call 877-906-2010
======================================================
We must elect strong Conservatives like Allen West and Marco Rubio.
The Wex Liars (Wexler) and Ron Kleins (D), and Alcee Hastings Crooks must go now!
To support Marco Rubio please CLICK HERE.
For information about Allen West, CLICK HERE.
Townhall Meeting July 15th at 6 pm!
You are invited to have a voice in this upcoming election
Please Join
ALLEN WEST For Congress
For a Townhall Meeting on Education, the Economy, and other Local Issues
When: Thursday, July 15th, 2010
at 6:00 pm
Where: Fort Lauderdale Christian School
in the Gymnasium
6330 NW 31st Ave, Fort Lauderdale FL 33309
For more information, please contact gowest@allenwestforcongress.com
or call 877-906-2010
======================================================
We must elect strong Conservatives like Allen West and Marco Rubio.
The Wex Liars (Wexler) and Ron Kleins (D), and Alcee Hastings Crooks must go now!
To support Marco Rubio please CLICK HERE.
Labels:
Allen-West,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Racist,
Liberals-Lie,
Marco-Rubio,
No-RINO,
Right,
Stop-Radical-Islam,
Support-Our-Troops
Monday, July 12, 2010
AMERICAN PRESIDENT?
I don't believe many patriotic Americans who voted for Barack Obama realize
what or who they voted for.
Signs from the past and by association with individuals who have not been known
to or have the best interest for America, shared the same thoughts.
By his actions, it is becoming evident his direction to change America has a hidden
agenda to rewrite the Constitution. Foreign affairs by his state department, and
face to face contact with foreign dignitaries by himself, leaves a question whether he is President of these United States.
Our economy is in shambles with devastating unemployment, heading in the direction
of third world status. The conditions are ripe for another Hugo Chavez type leader
to enforce his vision and power.
If you aren't working for the government, you are paying public sector salaries. The
government isn't, we are! Where does the government their money to hire their
employees? They get it from the private sector. When this money tree is depleted, it
will be ripe for Obama to step in and take over and add it to his mortgage monopoly,
the banks and General Motors.
The Media will suffer the same fate by radical liberal suicide supporters.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
what or who they voted for.
Signs from the past and by association with individuals who have not been known
to or have the best interest for America, shared the same thoughts.
By his actions, it is becoming evident his direction to change America has a hidden
agenda to rewrite the Constitution. Foreign affairs by his state department, and
face to face contact with foreign dignitaries by himself, leaves a question whether he is President of these United States.
Our economy is in shambles with devastating unemployment, heading in the direction
of third world status. The conditions are ripe for another Hugo Chavez type leader
to enforce his vision and power.
If you aren't working for the government, you are paying public sector salaries. The
government isn't, we are! Where does the government their money to hire their
employees? They get it from the private sector. When this money tree is depleted, it
will be ripe for Obama to step in and take over and add it to his mortgage monopoly,
the banks and General Motors.
The Media will suffer the same fate by radical liberal suicide supporters.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Democrat-Lies,
Fringe-Media,
Liberal-Fraud,
MSM-Fraud,
Nazi-Democrat,
Nazi-Left-Wing,
Support-Our-Troops,
TOTUS
Jabron James Takes The Money & Michelle Obama Condemning Tea Party
So we have the so-called First Lady going to NAACP meetings to condemn the Tea Party. She has made America out to be full of Racist except when they vote for her dim witted spouse. If anyone continues to support her, especially if you White, then you must be brain dead!
We see these Celebrity Types and some Sports people rake in tons of money and yet they want us, the average American, to tone it down. Barry HARVARD, his disgusting Wife and the Low Life Left Wingers will live high on the Hog and punish us every day!
Please read the outstanding story below on the Chief Race Baiter, Colonel Jesse Michael Jackson, or whatever his name is. J.C. Arenas is a tremendous writer.
One more thing is why aren't any of these Soetoro's and friends going after Coward Eric Holder and his New Black Panther Thugs?
Jesse Jackson plays the race card in LeBron James controversy
Written by J.C. Arenas
Jesse Jackson has come out against Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert for remarks he made after LeBron James's decision last week to leave the Cavs to play for the Miami Heat.
ESPN reports:
Jesse Jackson criticized Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert on Sunday, saying Gilbert sees LeBron James as a "runaway slave" and that the owner's comments after the free-agent forward decided to join the Miami Heat put the player in danger.
Shortly after James announced his decision last week, Gilbert fired off an incendiary letter to Cleveland's fans, ripping the 25-year-old and promising to deliver a title before James wins one. He called James' decision "cowardly" and later told The Associated Press he believes James quit during a handful of Cavaliers playoff games.
"He has gotten a free pass," Gilbert told the AP in a phone interview late Thursday night. "People have covered up for [James] for way too long. Tonight we saw who he really is."
Jackson said Gilbert's comments were "mean, arrogant and presumptuous."
"He speaks as an owner of LeBron and not the owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers," the reverend said in a release from his Chicago-based civil rights group, the Rainbow PUSH Coalition. "His feelings of betrayal personify a slave master mentality. He sees LeBron as a runaway slave. This is an owner employee relationship -- between business partners -- and LeBron honored his contract."
It's funny that Jackson feels compelled to provide his perspective on this situation involving a famous Black American athlete - and use an inflammatory term like "runaway slave" in the process - but doesn't feel it's necessary to criticize liberal politicians who intentionally avoid dealing with issues that disproportionately affect everyday Black Americans, such as unemployment, abortion, and education.
Jackson believes Gilbert had framed in his mind he was LeBron's "owner", but, if he wants to talk about people being owned, there are millions of Americans whose lives are supported solely by government assistance.
That's not an issue Jackson wants to tackle, he's more concerned with how a multi-millionaire Black athlete is being "treated" by the owner of his former team. If there's anything "good" that could be said about these despicable race baiters it's that they are consistent, unfortunately, they are consistently out of touch and useless.
Written by J.C. Arenas
We see these Celebrity Types and some Sports people rake in tons of money and yet they want us, the average American, to tone it down. Barry HARVARD, his disgusting Wife and the Low Life Left Wingers will live high on the Hog and punish us every day!
Please read the outstanding story below on the Chief Race Baiter, Colonel Jesse Michael Jackson, or whatever his name is. J.C. Arenas is a tremendous writer.
One more thing is why aren't any of these Soetoro's and friends going after Coward Eric Holder and his New Black Panther Thugs?
Jesse Jackson plays the race card in LeBron James controversy
Written by J.C. Arenas
Jesse Jackson has come out against Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert for remarks he made after LeBron James's decision last week to leave the Cavs to play for the Miami Heat.
ESPN reports:
Jesse Jackson criticized Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert on Sunday, saying Gilbert sees LeBron James as a "runaway slave" and that the owner's comments after the free-agent forward decided to join the Miami Heat put the player in danger.
Shortly after James announced his decision last week, Gilbert fired off an incendiary letter to Cleveland's fans, ripping the 25-year-old and promising to deliver a title before James wins one. He called James' decision "cowardly" and later told The Associated Press he believes James quit during a handful of Cavaliers playoff games.
"He has gotten a free pass," Gilbert told the AP in a phone interview late Thursday night. "People have covered up for [James] for way too long. Tonight we saw who he really is."
Jackson said Gilbert's comments were "mean, arrogant and presumptuous."
"He speaks as an owner of LeBron and not the owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers," the reverend said in a release from his Chicago-based civil rights group, the Rainbow PUSH Coalition. "His feelings of betrayal personify a slave master mentality. He sees LeBron as a runaway slave. This is an owner employee relationship -- between business partners -- and LeBron honored his contract."
It's funny that Jackson feels compelled to provide his perspective on this situation involving a famous Black American athlete - and use an inflammatory term like "runaway slave" in the process - but doesn't feel it's necessary to criticize liberal politicians who intentionally avoid dealing with issues that disproportionately affect everyday Black Americans, such as unemployment, abortion, and education.
Jackson believes Gilbert had framed in his mind he was LeBron's "owner", but, if he wants to talk about people being owned, there are millions of Americans whose lives are supported solely by government assistance.
That's not an issue Jackson wants to tackle, he's more concerned with how a multi-millionaire Black athlete is being "treated" by the owner of his former team. If there's anything "good" that could be said about these despicable race baiters it's that they are consistent, unfortunately, they are consistently out of touch and useless.
Written by J.C. Arenas
Great Orators of the Democrat Party???
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
"The buck stops here." - Harry S. Truman
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." - John F. Kennedy
And, from today's genius Democrats...
"It depends what your definition of 'Sex' is?'' - Bill Clinton
"That Obama ... I would like to cut his NUTS off." - Jesse Jackson
"Those rumors are false ... I believe in the sanctity of marriage." - John Edwards
"I invented the Internet." - Al Gore
"The next Person that tells me I'm not religious, I'm going to shove my rosary beads up their ASS." - Joe Biden
"America is ... is no longer, uh, what it ... it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was ... uh, and I say to myself, 'uh, I don't want that future, uh, uh for my children." - Barack Obama got into HARVARD?
"I have campaigned in all 57 states." - Barack Hussein Obama (Quoted 2008)
"You don't need God anymore, you have us Democrats." - Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2006)
"Paying taxes is voluntary." - Sen. Harry Reid
"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he." - Hillary Clinton (Quoted 1998)
And the most recent gem of wisdom from the "Mother Moron": "We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it."- Nancy Pelosi (Quoted March, 2010)
HOW LUCKY CAN WE BE - TO HAVE SUCH BRILLIANT MINDS IN CHARGE OF OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY?
''Life's tough ... it's even tougher if you're stupid.'' - John Wayne
Go green - recycle Congress in 2010!
Hat Tip to B, a Real Conservative
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
"The buck stops here." - Harry S. Truman
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." - John F. Kennedy
And, from today's genius Democrats...
"It depends what your definition of 'Sex' is?'' - Bill Clinton
"That Obama ... I would like to cut his NUTS off." - Jesse Jackson
"Those rumors are false ... I believe in the sanctity of marriage." - John Edwards
"I invented the Internet." - Al Gore
"The next Person that tells me I'm not religious, I'm going to shove my rosary beads up their ASS." - Joe Biden
"America is ... is no longer, uh, what it ... it, uh, could be, uh, what it was once was ... uh, and I say to myself, 'uh, I don't want that future, uh, uh for my children." - Barack Obama got into HARVARD?
"I have campaigned in all 57 states." - Barack Hussein Obama (Quoted 2008)
"You don't need God anymore, you have us Democrats." - Nancy Pelosi (Quoted 2006)
"Paying taxes is voluntary." - Sen. Harry Reid
"Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he." - Hillary Clinton (Quoted 1998)
And the most recent gem of wisdom from the "Mother Moron": "We just have to pass the Healthcare Bill to see what's in it."- Nancy Pelosi (Quoted March, 2010)
HOW LUCKY CAN WE BE - TO HAVE SUCH BRILLIANT MINDS IN CHARGE OF OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY?
''Life's tough ... it's even tougher if you're stupid.'' - John Wayne
Go green - recycle Congress in 2010!
Hat Tip to B, a Real Conservative
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Democrat-Lies,
Jesse-Jackson-Fraud,
Low-Life-Liberals,
Nazi-Pelosi,
Slick-Willie,
Stop-Marxism
Sunday, July 11, 2010
OBAMA's END GAME REVEALED
From Capitalism to Communism! All Conservatives need to watch this!
Barry Soetoro the RACE BAITER and Socialist / Communist / Marxist / Maoist.
Hat Tip to ImpeachTheIdiot.
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Commie-Paul-McCarthy,
communists,
Community-Organizer,
Conservative-Blog,
Fire-Holder,
Fringe-Media,
Michelle-Obama-Food-Nazi,
Stop-Marxism,
Useful-Idiots,
Video
New Black Panther Party Leader Malik Shabazz Heaping Praise on Bin Laden
One of Barry Soetoro's early supporters reaps praise on Obama Bin laden. This Shabazz is a standard Racist. Yet Eric Holder gives him a his gang a pass. Barry gave us Holder. Shouldn't both Barry and Holder step down now?
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Coward-Holder,
Fire-Holder,
Impeach-Barry,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberal-Racist,
Liberals-Lie,
Nazi-Democrat,
Video
Barry, Thee Affirmative Action Hero!
As the Fringe Media pedaled all their lies about the Smartest President ever, well now moderates are learning the truth. True Conservatives researched this knucklehead and we knew he was just an "Affirmative Action Hero". The Left Wing Nazis and many Moderates were always grasping to find a person of Color to be their true "Affirmative Action Hero".
Conservatives just want a great President, skin color is not a prerequisite.
Rush touched on something the other day. I did not get to hear his ending but he mentioned Business Leaders. There are many Business Leaders who are hoarding cash. Many of these so-called Experts had even supported Barry Soetoro. Now they are scared to death! Think about the next time you buy stock in a Company. Is that Company CEO and Associates the same people who jumped on the "Barry Bandwagon"? These people were putting your hard earned cash on the line and did not research what Barry was really like. Do they not know how he got into HARVARD?
The article below is greatly written by Stuart Schwartz. He points out the fraud in the White House.
The Dumbest President...EVER!
By Stuart Schwartz
Barack Obama is the dumbest president...EVER.
That is a reasonable conclusion once you've assessed the first nineteen months of his presidency and compared it to the definition of intelligence put together by researchers in the field. Although the mainstream media have spent the last two years proclaiming Obama "super-smart" or, as Newsweek put it, "sort of God" in stature and brilliance, the 44th president of the United States is poised to surpass our 15th president, James Buchanan. Jr., as the White House occupant who has made the dumbest moves while in office. With two years left, he is on the fast track to last.
That takes some doing, for the leadership of the hapless Buchanan prior to the Civil War "has led to his consistent ranking by historians as one of the worst Presidents." This is the president who vetoed a college funding bill because "there were already too many educated people" in the young nation. Buchanan's judgment was so wretched that he thought anti-slavery forces could be convinced to give up their opposition by his personal assurances that slaves were "treated with kindness and humanity" and that poverty could be ended by simply printing more money. Sound familiar?
Barack Obama is dumb. How dumb? Alfred E. Newman dumb, says columnist David Limbaugh, who labeled him "President Alfred E. Obama" because of his blithe disregard of the basics of fiscal responsibility. Alfred E. Newman is the Mad magazine mascot, whose answer to every problem is his signature statement: "What, me worry?"
How dumb? How-many-Obamas-does-it-take-to-screw-in-a-light-bulb dumb. And in the answer lies the answer, the key to his pole position in the race to last: It takes 242. One to hold the light bulb, four to turn the ladder, eighteen to assess conformity to OSHA workplace requirements, four to assess the environmental impact of the burnt-out bulb disposal, twelve to participate in a task force to evaluate green energy solutions for a replacement bulb, eight to script his actions, four to script instructions and work the teleprompter, 23 to work with the justice department to sue the light bulb manufacturer...you get the picture. And, Ã la Buchanan, Obama never does get that light bulb changed.
That James Buchanan "fiddled while Rome burned" seems to be the consensus of historians. His approach to the raging controversy over slavery in the decade preceding the Civil War was based on ignoring evidence and acting upon events as he wished them to be, not as they were. Fast-forward to the present: Obama responds to the Gulf crisis by trying to move us toward the collapsed centralized green economy of Spain, ignoring the fact that even Spain acknowledges that "every 'green job' created with government money...came at the cost of 2.2 regular jobs, and only one in 10 of the newly created green jobs became a permanent job."
In all areas of his presidency, Obama has demonstrated a striking disregard of facts, lack of good reasoning, and inability to function at an executive level, all at the core of the textbook definition of intelligence derived from more than a half century of research. Intelligence, the experts tell us, comes down to understanding the meaning of the world around us, and then using that understanding to live skillfully and appropriately (i.e., to get stuff done). One survey of more than fifty researchers in the field of intelligence offers the following definition:
A very special mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings---"catching on", "making sense" of things, or "figuring out" what to do.
Obama is Buchanan-esque in his inability to function as an executive, a key part of intelligence. Even a cursory analysis of history shows that limited government and free markets have produced prosperity; so Obama expands government and takes over private businesses, causing one observer to throw up his hands at another Buchanan moment from Obama and exclaim, "It isn't rocket science, Mr. President!" Hands-on executives and laser focus are business school basics for solving problems; so Obama parties rather than roll up his sleeves, unleashes federal regulators on hapless Gulf state residents rather than cutting through the red tape, and appoints study panels even as the oil washes ashore (e.g., see video timeline). Radical Islamists are waging war against the United States; Obama does a full Buchanan -- or, if you will, an Alfred E. Newman-style "What, me worry?" -- and, denying the existence of Islamic terrorism, asks whom are you going to believe -- me or your lying eyes?
The ability to draw reasonable conclusions from everyday life and then use those conclusions to adapt is fundamental to high intelligence, says cognitive psychologist Robert J. Steinberg, the award-winning Tufts University dean and University of Cambridge fellow. In other words, the scientific community has established good reasoning, learning from past experience, and acting according to those experiences as integral to high intelligence.
It does not include, as David Brooks, tells us, having an exceptional and "perfectly creased pant [leg]" or -- in what Hot Air's Allahpundit calls "a loathsome expression of elitism" -- being able to "talk like us," Brooks, and others of the "smart set." If that were the case, all we would need to increase intelligence in the U.S. Congress is to provide our elected representatives with dry cleaning services. As for the "talk like us" part, it doesn't take intelligence to talk like a self-styled intellectual, a.k.a. a New York Times columnist. Hawkeye Pearce has already shown us the way in the classic "Love Story" episode of television's "Mash." He teaches Radar, the shy Iowa farm boy who has a crush on a nurse who reads the classics and enjoys Bach, to reply with, eyebrows uplifted, "Ahhh...Bach" when she discusses music and throw in the occasional "That's highly significant."
Want to impress David Brooks and others of the media engaging in what Bernard Goldberg calls "a slobbering love affair" with the president? Simple. Reply, as Obama has done, "Ahhh...Burke" to David Brooks, enthralled by a president who expressed appreciation for the "finer points" of political philosophy; or flash your degree to Christopher Buckley, formerly of National Review, awestruck by Obama's "Harvard intellect"; or simply present Marxism and mainline elegance as typical of the academic life, and media academics like Michael Beschloss will gush on mainstream news, "he's probably the smartest guy ever to become President."
But intelligence is as intelligence does, as Forest Gump might remind us. Harvard has produced more than its share of great men and women, but it has also produced the Unabomber, Barney Frank, and Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling...and now, the next James Buchanan.
So the next time Brooks or others in the mainstream media firmament tell you that Barack Obama is a towering intellect, the smartest president ever, just nod your head wisely and say, "Ahhh...pant leg."
Written by Stuart Schwartz, a former retail and media executive, is on the faculty at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.
Conservatives just want a great President, skin color is not a prerequisite.
Rush touched on something the other day. I did not get to hear his ending but he mentioned Business Leaders. There are many Business Leaders who are hoarding cash. Many of these so-called Experts had even supported Barry Soetoro. Now they are scared to death! Think about the next time you buy stock in a Company. Is that Company CEO and Associates the same people who jumped on the "Barry Bandwagon"? These people were putting your hard earned cash on the line and did not research what Barry was really like. Do they not know how he got into HARVARD?
The article below is greatly written by Stuart Schwartz. He points out the fraud in the White House.
The Dumbest President...EVER!
By Stuart Schwartz
Barack Obama is the dumbest president...EVER.
That is a reasonable conclusion once you've assessed the first nineteen months of his presidency and compared it to the definition of intelligence put together by researchers in the field. Although the mainstream media have spent the last two years proclaiming Obama "super-smart" or, as Newsweek put it, "sort of God" in stature and brilliance, the 44th president of the United States is poised to surpass our 15th president, James Buchanan. Jr., as the White House occupant who has made the dumbest moves while in office. With two years left, he is on the fast track to last.
That takes some doing, for the leadership of the hapless Buchanan prior to the Civil War "has led to his consistent ranking by historians as one of the worst Presidents." This is the president who vetoed a college funding bill because "there were already too many educated people" in the young nation. Buchanan's judgment was so wretched that he thought anti-slavery forces could be convinced to give up their opposition by his personal assurances that slaves were "treated with kindness and humanity" and that poverty could be ended by simply printing more money. Sound familiar?
Barack Obama is dumb. How dumb? Alfred E. Newman dumb, says columnist David Limbaugh, who labeled him "President Alfred E. Obama" because of his blithe disregard of the basics of fiscal responsibility. Alfred E. Newman is the Mad magazine mascot, whose answer to every problem is his signature statement: "What, me worry?"
How dumb? How-many-Obamas-does-it-take-to-screw-in-a-light-bulb dumb. And in the answer lies the answer, the key to his pole position in the race to last: It takes 242. One to hold the light bulb, four to turn the ladder, eighteen to assess conformity to OSHA workplace requirements, four to assess the environmental impact of the burnt-out bulb disposal, twelve to participate in a task force to evaluate green energy solutions for a replacement bulb, eight to script his actions, four to script instructions and work the teleprompter, 23 to work with the justice department to sue the light bulb manufacturer...you get the picture. And, Ã la Buchanan, Obama never does get that light bulb changed.
That James Buchanan "fiddled while Rome burned" seems to be the consensus of historians. His approach to the raging controversy over slavery in the decade preceding the Civil War was based on ignoring evidence and acting upon events as he wished them to be, not as they were. Fast-forward to the present: Obama responds to the Gulf crisis by trying to move us toward the collapsed centralized green economy of Spain, ignoring the fact that even Spain acknowledges that "every 'green job' created with government money...came at the cost of 2.2 regular jobs, and only one in 10 of the newly created green jobs became a permanent job."
In all areas of his presidency, Obama has demonstrated a striking disregard of facts, lack of good reasoning, and inability to function at an executive level, all at the core of the textbook definition of intelligence derived from more than a half century of research. Intelligence, the experts tell us, comes down to understanding the meaning of the world around us, and then using that understanding to live skillfully and appropriately (i.e., to get stuff done). One survey of more than fifty researchers in the field of intelligence offers the following definition:
A very special mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings---"catching on", "making sense" of things, or "figuring out" what to do.
Obama is Buchanan-esque in his inability to function as an executive, a key part of intelligence. Even a cursory analysis of history shows that limited government and free markets have produced prosperity; so Obama expands government and takes over private businesses, causing one observer to throw up his hands at another Buchanan moment from Obama and exclaim, "It isn't rocket science, Mr. President!" Hands-on executives and laser focus are business school basics for solving problems; so Obama parties rather than roll up his sleeves, unleashes federal regulators on hapless Gulf state residents rather than cutting through the red tape, and appoints study panels even as the oil washes ashore (e.g., see video timeline). Radical Islamists are waging war against the United States; Obama does a full Buchanan -- or, if you will, an Alfred E. Newman-style "What, me worry?" -- and, denying the existence of Islamic terrorism, asks whom are you going to believe -- me or your lying eyes?
The ability to draw reasonable conclusions from everyday life and then use those conclusions to adapt is fundamental to high intelligence, says cognitive psychologist Robert J. Steinberg, the award-winning Tufts University dean and University of Cambridge fellow. In other words, the scientific community has established good reasoning, learning from past experience, and acting according to those experiences as integral to high intelligence.
It does not include, as David Brooks, tells us, having an exceptional and "perfectly creased pant [leg]" or -- in what Hot Air's Allahpundit calls "a loathsome expression of elitism" -- being able to "talk like us," Brooks, and others of the "smart set." If that were the case, all we would need to increase intelligence in the U.S. Congress is to provide our elected representatives with dry cleaning services. As for the "talk like us" part, it doesn't take intelligence to talk like a self-styled intellectual, a.k.a. a New York Times columnist. Hawkeye Pearce has already shown us the way in the classic "Love Story" episode of television's "Mash." He teaches Radar, the shy Iowa farm boy who has a crush on a nurse who reads the classics and enjoys Bach, to reply with, eyebrows uplifted, "Ahhh...Bach" when she discusses music and throw in the occasional "That's highly significant."
Want to impress David Brooks and others of the media engaging in what Bernard Goldberg calls "a slobbering love affair" with the president? Simple. Reply, as Obama has done, "Ahhh...Burke" to David Brooks, enthralled by a president who expressed appreciation for the "finer points" of political philosophy; or flash your degree to Christopher Buckley, formerly of National Review, awestruck by Obama's "Harvard intellect"; or simply present Marxism and mainline elegance as typical of the academic life, and media academics like Michael Beschloss will gush on mainstream news, "he's probably the smartest guy ever to become President."
But intelligence is as intelligence does, as Forest Gump might remind us. Harvard has produced more than its share of great men and women, but it has also produced the Unabomber, Barney Frank, and Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling...and now, the next James Buchanan.
So the next time Brooks or others in the mainstream media firmament tell you that Barack Obama is a towering intellect, the smartest president ever, just nod your head wisely and say, "Ahhh...pant leg."
Written by Stuart Schwartz, a former retail and media executive, is on the faculty at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Inflated Salaries and Egos
Too many Americans wear their brain where the sun don't shine.
Celebrity entertainers and athletes command obscene salaries for contributing nil to society. The public is at fault for contributing to the unbalanced compensation by patronizing their events and performances. Heads of companies and professional sports team owners trip over themselves to gain the upper edge over competitors by offering ridiculous contracts to anyone with a sharp business agent and manager.
A college graduate with a degree in biochemistry or astrophysics will never command the money in their life time that an athletic scholarship, liberal arts major will, while team owners with open check books, are waiting for them to graduate.
Ticket prices are getting out of hand because of the exorbitant salaries, and to help absorb the added cost of securing these events, theaters, arenas and stadiums raise the prices at the candy counter and concession stands.
Consumer goods also go up, because somebody has to pay for the millions of dollars in endorsements paid to these blobs for doing nothing except capitalizing on their notoriety.
Because these pseudo idolized creations by Marketers are put on pedestals, they think they are priveleged and moral behavior does not apply to them. I can't think of many of them in these fields of endeavor as role models for good, but I think many can be responsible for the decay of morality.
We can say, "Enough!" with our pocket book.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
Celebrity entertainers and athletes command obscene salaries for contributing nil to society. The public is at fault for contributing to the unbalanced compensation by patronizing their events and performances. Heads of companies and professional sports team owners trip over themselves to gain the upper edge over competitors by offering ridiculous contracts to anyone with a sharp business agent and manager.
A college graduate with a degree in biochemistry or astrophysics will never command the money in their life time that an athletic scholarship, liberal arts major will, while team owners with open check books, are waiting for them to graduate.
Ticket prices are getting out of hand because of the exorbitant salaries, and to help absorb the added cost of securing these events, theaters, arenas and stadiums raise the prices at the candy counter and concession stands.
Consumer goods also go up, because somebody has to pay for the millions of dollars in endorsements paid to these blobs for doing nothing except capitalizing on their notoriety.
Because these pseudo idolized creations by Marketers are put on pedestals, they think they are priveleged and moral behavior does not apply to them. I can't think of many of them in these fields of endeavor as role models for good, but I think many can be responsible for the decay of morality.
We can say, "Enough!" with our pocket book.
Written by George, a Real Conservative
Labels:
astrophysics,
biochemistry,
Conservatism,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberals-Lie
Show Your ID
I'm a legal American citizen and I must show my ID when:
1. Pulled over by the police.
2. Making purchases on my department store credit card.
3. When I show up for a doctor's appointment.
4. When filling out a credit card or loan application.
5. When applying for or renewing a driver's license or passport.
6. When applying for any kind of insurance.
7. When filling out college applications.
8. When donating blood.
9. When obtaining certain prescription drugs.
10. When making some debit purchases, especially if I'm out of state.
11. When collecting a boarding pass for airline or train travel.
I'm sure there are more instances, but the point is that we citizens of the USA are required to prove who we are nearly every day!
Why should people in this country illegally, be exempt!!!!!
Why shouldn't we guard our borders as closely as every other country in the world does?
Support ARIZONA and Stop Marxism!!!
1. Pulled over by the police.
2. Making purchases on my department store credit card.
3. When I show up for a doctor's appointment.
4. When filling out a credit card or loan application.
5. When applying for or renewing a driver's license or passport.
6. When applying for any kind of insurance.
7. When filling out college applications.
8. When donating blood.
9. When obtaining certain prescription drugs.
10. When making some debit purchases, especially if I'm out of state.
11. When collecting a boarding pass for airline or train travel.
I'm sure there are more instances, but the point is that we citizens of the USA are required to prove who we are nearly every day!
Why should people in this country illegally, be exempt!!!!!
Why shouldn't we guard our borders as closely as every other country in the world does?
Support ARIZONA and Stop Marxism!!!
Labels:
Arizona,
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Illegal-Alien,
Illegal-Immigrant,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberal-Racist,
Low-Life-Tom-Hanks,
Stop-Marxism,
Support-Our-Troops
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Obama bashes our Brave Founding Fathers on the 4th of July
Barry Soetoro loves to bash America. He describes our founding Fathers as if they were his Rapper Gang Members. The Racist rappers who helped Barry get elected.
Barry's posse is obsessed with material things and trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Barry won't bash his Thug Rappers, only the brave Founding Fathers of the United States of America.
Below is a great article on Barry's disgusting comments.
He can't resist: Obama bashes Founders on the 4th of July
Written by Jeannie DeAngelis
It appears the President of the United States can't contain his disdain for America's historical roots. On Independence Day, instead of stressing the awesome concepts of the Declaration of Independence, Obama managed to turn a BBQ into an opportunity to disparage our founders, foster class warfare and further division.
On July 4th the Commander-in-Chief invited the military to a White House cookout and then used the occasion to skewer the Founding Fathers. Rather than depicting America as "one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all," once again Barack-the-great-divider separated America into factions and brought up a time in our history where, in his view, America lacked, "civil rights and voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights."
A casually dressed Obama, who couldn't make Memorial Day at Arlington Cemetery, appeared on the balcony high above the active-duty military and their families who were waving flags and wearing red, white and blue face paint. The President, with Michelle at his side, spoke to the group, saying that today may be Independence Day, but "Today we also celebrate all of you, the men and women of our armed forces, who defend this country we love."
While America focused on Cedric the Entertainer, the U.S. Marine band, Sabrett® hot dogs, Obama's short-sleeved polo shirt, and the outstanding potato salad, the thing that was the most telling about the event were Obama's sentiments when he said the following:
We celebrate the principles that are timeless, tenets first declared by men of property and wealth but which gave rise to what Lincoln called a new birth of freedom in America-civil rights and voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights, and the rights of every American. And on this day that is uniquely American we are reminded that our Declaration, our example, made us a beacon to the world.
Eerily comfortable on a balcony delivering a speech to the crowd below, Obama surreptitiously served up the founding fathers of this nation like shish kabob, disparaging them as merely "men of property and wealth." Then Obama, who identifies himself with a great president who freed slaves rather than made new ones, in an underhanded way elevated Abraham Lincoln above the evil white men who dared to own property and accumulate personal wealth with a simple qualifying "but."
For Obama, the "birth of freedom" at our nation's founding doesn't quite cut the hot dog mustard. Instead Barry relishes what followed: "civil rights, voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights," and hopefully soon, illegal immigrants' rights. Apparently, in the president's mind, "social justice" is what makes us "uniquely American."
Obama's words indicate a view that addendums to independence are far superior to the miracle of our nation's birth and the genius of the men who founded this nation.
It is a travesty that an ungrateful, misguided American president implied America's freedom is "a beacon to the world," merely because of women's suffrage and workers' rights.
Our nation's greatness was and is exhibited by the fact that dirt poor men like Samuel Adams and men of "wealth and property" like Thomas Jefferson believed so much in freedom that, unlike Barack Obama, of one mind and one accord America's founders put aside many differences to lay the foundation for our nation's liberty and glorious, God-given independence.
Author's content: www.jeannie-ology.com
Barry's posse is obsessed with material things and trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Barry won't bash his Thug Rappers, only the brave Founding Fathers of the United States of America.
Below is a great article on Barry's disgusting comments.
He can't resist: Obama bashes Founders on the 4th of July
Written by Jeannie DeAngelis
It appears the President of the United States can't contain his disdain for America's historical roots. On Independence Day, instead of stressing the awesome concepts of the Declaration of Independence, Obama managed to turn a BBQ into an opportunity to disparage our founders, foster class warfare and further division.
On July 4th the Commander-in-Chief invited the military to a White House cookout and then used the occasion to skewer the Founding Fathers. Rather than depicting America as "one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all," once again Barack-the-great-divider separated America into factions and brought up a time in our history where, in his view, America lacked, "civil rights and voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights."
A casually dressed Obama, who couldn't make Memorial Day at Arlington Cemetery, appeared on the balcony high above the active-duty military and their families who were waving flags and wearing red, white and blue face paint. The President, with Michelle at his side, spoke to the group, saying that today may be Independence Day, but "Today we also celebrate all of you, the men and women of our armed forces, who defend this country we love."
While America focused on Cedric the Entertainer, the U.S. Marine band, Sabrett® hot dogs, Obama's short-sleeved polo shirt, and the outstanding potato salad, the thing that was the most telling about the event were Obama's sentiments when he said the following:
We celebrate the principles that are timeless, tenets first declared by men of property and wealth but which gave rise to what Lincoln called a new birth of freedom in America-civil rights and voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights, and the rights of every American. And on this day that is uniquely American we are reminded that our Declaration, our example, made us a beacon to the world.
Eerily comfortable on a balcony delivering a speech to the crowd below, Obama surreptitiously served up the founding fathers of this nation like shish kabob, disparaging them as merely "men of property and wealth." Then Obama, who identifies himself with a great president who freed slaves rather than made new ones, in an underhanded way elevated Abraham Lincoln above the evil white men who dared to own property and accumulate personal wealth with a simple qualifying "but."
For Obama, the "birth of freedom" at our nation's founding doesn't quite cut the hot dog mustard. Instead Barry relishes what followed: "civil rights, voting rights, workers' rights and women's rights," and hopefully soon, illegal immigrants' rights. Apparently, in the president's mind, "social justice" is what makes us "uniquely American."
Obama's words indicate a view that addendums to independence are far superior to the miracle of our nation's birth and the genius of the men who founded this nation.
It is a travesty that an ungrateful, misguided American president implied America's freedom is "a beacon to the world," merely because of women's suffrage and workers' rights.
Our nation's greatness was and is exhibited by the fact that dirt poor men like Samuel Adams and men of "wealth and property" like Thomas Jefferson believed so much in freedom that, unlike Barack Obama, of one mind and one accord America's founders put aside many differences to lay the foundation for our nation's liberty and glorious, God-given independence.
Author's content: www.jeannie-ology.com
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative-Blog,
Founding-Fathers,
Liberals-Lie,
Obamas-Rapper-Thugs,
Stop-Marxism
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Stop Marxism & Stop Liberal Kagan!
The U.S. Supreme Court, in rare 8-0 unanimous decision, ruled that Obama court nominee Elena Kagan was wrong to ban ROTC military recruiters from the Harvard campus in 2004-05. Even the liberals on the Court ruled against her.
She is unqualified and a poison to be spread on America by Barry Soetoro.
A great article below why Kagen is wrong for America.
Why Kagan Is Unqualified -- and Dangerous
By Selwyn Duke
Despite being thoroughly unqualified to occupy the bench, Elena Kagan will most likely be confirmed to the Supreme Court. This is because most of our hundred senators are almost as unqualified to judge a judge as she is to be one. What is the proper criterion to apply? Well, a simple analogy illustrates the point best.
Let's say you needed to hire a football referee. If he said that he was a "pragmatic" referee, who viewed the rule book as "living" and thus would interpret the rules to suit the "times," would he be your man?
Since it's the job of the rule-makers to craft the rules, and the referee's role is only to determine if they've been broken, I think you'd be aghast. It would be obvious that you were dealing with someone who didn't know what his job was or was unwilling to perform it. And you certainly wouldn't want to hire a referee who was giving himself the latitude to say, "This fellow here violated a rule, but since I don't like that rule, I'm going to let his action stand" or "That guy over there has gone by the book, but I don't like something he did, so I'll penalize him anyway."
A judge's job is analogous to a referee's. It is the legislature's (rule-makers') place to make the rules, and the judge's only role is to determine if they've been broken. How he feels about a given law is irrelevant. He is but a gatekeeper.
Yet there is a difference between the two examples: While people could easily grasp this if the matter were a frivolity such as sports, they entertain the most inane rationalizations when the issue is our national rulebook, the Constitution. They then allow judicial con artists to muddy the waters with specious concepts such as the "living document," interpretations that suit the "times" and "pragmatism." They take people such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg seriously when she says the Constitution shouldn't be "stuck in time." (It's not. It's stuck in law, which can be changed through the Amendment Process.) But these are all dodges that distract us from the truth: There aren't constructionists and pragmatists, times-oriented judges and text-oriented ones, living-document ones and originalists. At the end of the day, there are only two kinds of justices:
Good justices and bad justices.
Good justices do their job and abide by the Constitution. Bad ones don't.
And Elena Kagan would be a remarkably bad justice.
Her history and words reveal this clearly. As Phyllis Schlafly recently wrote:
When Kagan was dean of Harvard Law School, she presented a guest speaker who is known as the most activist judge in the world: Judge Aharon Barak, formerly president of the Israeli Supreme Court.
... Barak has written that a judge should "make" and "create" law, assume "a role in the legislative process" and give statutes "new meaning that suits new social needs."
Barak wrote that a judge "is subject to no authority" except himself, and he "must sometimes depart the confines of his legal system and channel into it fundamental values not yet found in it" [emphasis mine].
And how does Kagan feel about this man?
She calls him her "judicial hero."
Now, such judges are often characterized as judicial activists, but that is too kind a term. They are Nullification Jurists -- and they represent a profound danger to our republic. Let's examine why.
John Stuart Mill once said, "I can hardly imagine any laws so bad, to which I would not rather be subject than to the caprice of a man." Well, you can dress the Nullification Jurist fiction up any way you want, but at the end of the day, it is nothing but subjection to the caprice of a man in a black robe.
Think about it: Jurists may say they are interpreting the Constitution to suit the times, but who determines the "times"? The people do. And what are the implications of this "times" philosophy?
First, to abide by the "times" would be to render the Constitution unnecessary, for the very purpose of a constitution is to temper the times with the timeless. That is to say, a good constitution reflects enduring truths, not alluring fashions. It embodies the "votes" of not merely those walking about today, but of all those who have lived since our republic's inception, for it exists only because the founding generation created it and subsequent ones tacitly approved it by allowing it to stand. It represents the democracy of the whole family of man -- including his ancestors.
This stabilizing factor is important because, even collectively, people are prone to fits of emotionalism -- to the caprice of men. And because a good constitution is hard to change, it forces a capricious citizenry to take a deep breath and count to ten, at which point the emotion may have subsided and cooler heads may prevail. It acts as a firewall against the mob-rule phenomenon.
Thus, to truly abide by the times would be to reduce us to what remains when you strip away both the Constitution and the legislature: a straight democracy. That is, a democracy with a little twist.
The votes are inferred by judges, who supposedly are infallible conduits of popular opinion.
This is how it could work in theory, anyway. But the reality is that most Nullification Jurists couldn't care less about the "times." Case in point: In recent years we've seen some state courts divine a right to faux marriage in their state constitutions. But since a majority in every one of those states opposes faux marriage, were the judges really interpreting their constitutions to suit the times? Sure, if it was The New York Times.
The truth is that "living document," the "times," and "pragmatism" are nothing but weasel words that facilitate rationalization and obscure Nullification Jurists' true modus operandi. What is this? Well, since they aren't abiding by the Constitution or the times, there is only one thing left: what feels right to them.
This mindset isn't unusual, as people have always found a rationale for their tyranny. For a long time, we had the Divine Right of Kings, stating that a monarch governed according to God's will and thus wasn't subject to the will of the people, or any other worldly authority, and that he could do no wrong. Relativists are even worse. A person such as Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot deified himself, made his worldview (based on what felt right) the little god's law, and believed he was "subject to no authority except himself." Sound familiar?
It also sounds dangerous. And we should all be enraged. Remember that while government is supposed to derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, the jurists in question are doing nothing less than nullifying our votes. For they are ignoring the law, which reflects the will of the people as expressed through duly elected representatives. These judges aren't channeling democracy -- they are stealing it.
So what is the solution? Note that Nullification Jurists have signaled their contempt for the law loud and clear. And if they won't submit to the rule of law, why should we submit to the rule of lawyers? If they won't accept that the Constitution is "stuck" in law, why should we accept that the law is stuck in courts? Let me be clear: There is neither a moral nor a legal obligation to abide by the rules of the game when judicial oligarchs have brazenly said they will game the rules. Being a Nullification Jurist is a constitution-breaker, a republic-breaker, and, my fellow Americans, a deal-breaker.
The fact that an Elena Kagan could even make it to hearings is already a confirmation. It confirms that most of our leaders haven't a clue as to how a constitutional republic is supposed to work or, worse still, are content to create an oligarchy of like-minded judicial statists. It is unlawful and renders the government illegitimate, but they do it because they can. And unless we Americans wish to be subject to those who are "subject to no authority except themselves," governors and citizens should remember this: Nullification works both ways.
By Selwyn Duke
She is unqualified and a poison to be spread on America by Barry Soetoro.
A great article below why Kagen is wrong for America.
Why Kagan Is Unqualified -- and Dangerous
By Selwyn Duke
Despite being thoroughly unqualified to occupy the bench, Elena Kagan will most likely be confirmed to the Supreme Court. This is because most of our hundred senators are almost as unqualified to judge a judge as she is to be one. What is the proper criterion to apply? Well, a simple analogy illustrates the point best.
Let's say you needed to hire a football referee. If he said that he was a "pragmatic" referee, who viewed the rule book as "living" and thus would interpret the rules to suit the "times," would he be your man?
Since it's the job of the rule-makers to craft the rules, and the referee's role is only to determine if they've been broken, I think you'd be aghast. It would be obvious that you were dealing with someone who didn't know what his job was or was unwilling to perform it. And you certainly wouldn't want to hire a referee who was giving himself the latitude to say, "This fellow here violated a rule, but since I don't like that rule, I'm going to let his action stand" or "That guy over there has gone by the book, but I don't like something he did, so I'll penalize him anyway."
A judge's job is analogous to a referee's. It is the legislature's (rule-makers') place to make the rules, and the judge's only role is to determine if they've been broken. How he feels about a given law is irrelevant. He is but a gatekeeper.
Yet there is a difference between the two examples: While people could easily grasp this if the matter were a frivolity such as sports, they entertain the most inane rationalizations when the issue is our national rulebook, the Constitution. They then allow judicial con artists to muddy the waters with specious concepts such as the "living document," interpretations that suit the "times" and "pragmatism." They take people such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg seriously when she says the Constitution shouldn't be "stuck in time." (It's not. It's stuck in law, which can be changed through the Amendment Process.) But these are all dodges that distract us from the truth: There aren't constructionists and pragmatists, times-oriented judges and text-oriented ones, living-document ones and originalists. At the end of the day, there are only two kinds of justices:
Good justices and bad justices.
Good justices do their job and abide by the Constitution. Bad ones don't.
And Elena Kagan would be a remarkably bad justice.
Her history and words reveal this clearly. As Phyllis Schlafly recently wrote:
When Kagan was dean of Harvard Law School, she presented a guest speaker who is known as the most activist judge in the world: Judge Aharon Barak, formerly president of the Israeli Supreme Court.
... Barak has written that a judge should "make" and "create" law, assume "a role in the legislative process" and give statutes "new meaning that suits new social needs."
Barak wrote that a judge "is subject to no authority" except himself, and he "must sometimes depart the confines of his legal system and channel into it fundamental values not yet found in it" [emphasis mine].
And how does Kagan feel about this man?
She calls him her "judicial hero."
Now, such judges are often characterized as judicial activists, but that is too kind a term. They are Nullification Jurists -- and they represent a profound danger to our republic. Let's examine why.
John Stuart Mill once said, "I can hardly imagine any laws so bad, to which I would not rather be subject than to the caprice of a man." Well, you can dress the Nullification Jurist fiction up any way you want, but at the end of the day, it is nothing but subjection to the caprice of a man in a black robe.
Think about it: Jurists may say they are interpreting the Constitution to suit the times, but who determines the "times"? The people do. And what are the implications of this "times" philosophy?
First, to abide by the "times" would be to render the Constitution unnecessary, for the very purpose of a constitution is to temper the times with the timeless. That is to say, a good constitution reflects enduring truths, not alluring fashions. It embodies the "votes" of not merely those walking about today, but of all those who have lived since our republic's inception, for it exists only because the founding generation created it and subsequent ones tacitly approved it by allowing it to stand. It represents the democracy of the whole family of man -- including his ancestors.
This stabilizing factor is important because, even collectively, people are prone to fits of emotionalism -- to the caprice of men. And because a good constitution is hard to change, it forces a capricious citizenry to take a deep breath and count to ten, at which point the emotion may have subsided and cooler heads may prevail. It acts as a firewall against the mob-rule phenomenon.
Thus, to truly abide by the times would be to reduce us to what remains when you strip away both the Constitution and the legislature: a straight democracy. That is, a democracy with a little twist.
The votes are inferred by judges, who supposedly are infallible conduits of popular opinion.
This is how it could work in theory, anyway. But the reality is that most Nullification Jurists couldn't care less about the "times." Case in point: In recent years we've seen some state courts divine a right to faux marriage in their state constitutions. But since a majority in every one of those states opposes faux marriage, were the judges really interpreting their constitutions to suit the times? Sure, if it was The New York Times.
The truth is that "living document," the "times," and "pragmatism" are nothing but weasel words that facilitate rationalization and obscure Nullification Jurists' true modus operandi. What is this? Well, since they aren't abiding by the Constitution or the times, there is only one thing left: what feels right to them.
This mindset isn't unusual, as people have always found a rationale for their tyranny. For a long time, we had the Divine Right of Kings, stating that a monarch governed according to God's will and thus wasn't subject to the will of the people, or any other worldly authority, and that he could do no wrong. Relativists are even worse. A person such as Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot deified himself, made his worldview (based on what felt right) the little god's law, and believed he was "subject to no authority except himself." Sound familiar?
It also sounds dangerous. And we should all be enraged. Remember that while government is supposed to derive its just powers from the consent of the governed, the jurists in question are doing nothing less than nullifying our votes. For they are ignoring the law, which reflects the will of the people as expressed through duly elected representatives. These judges aren't channeling democracy -- they are stealing it.
So what is the solution? Note that Nullification Jurists have signaled their contempt for the law loud and clear. And if they won't submit to the rule of law, why should we submit to the rule of lawyers? If they won't accept that the Constitution is "stuck" in law, why should we accept that the law is stuck in courts? Let me be clear: There is neither a moral nor a legal obligation to abide by the rules of the game when judicial oligarchs have brazenly said they will game the rules. Being a Nullification Jurist is a constitution-breaker, a republic-breaker, and, my fellow Americans, a deal-breaker.
The fact that an Elena Kagan could even make it to hearings is already a confirmation. It confirms that most of our leaders haven't a clue as to how a constitutional republic is supposed to work or, worse still, are content to create an oligarchy of like-minded judicial statists. It is unlawful and renders the government illegitimate, but they do it because they can. And unless we Americans wish to be subject to those who are "subject to no authority except themselves," governors and citizens should remember this: Nullification works both ways.
By Selwyn Duke
Labels:
Barry-Soetoro,
Conservative,
Conservative-Blog,
Liberal-Fraud,
Liberal-Hypocrisy,
Liberal-Racist,
Low-Life-Tom-Hanks,
Stop-Marxism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)