Sunday, July 31, 2011

We Stand with the Gentleman from Florida

Written by Phil Orenstein

One often hears the endless rants of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-Fl.), the new chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, wailing about liberal causes to the cameras of C-SPAN from the floor of the House of Representatives. In the recent spat between Wasserman Shultz and Congressman West, the congressional Democrats are rallying to show their support for Wasserman Shultz. Now Republicans need to step up to the plate and rally behind a true leader, Congressman Allen West (R-Fl).

On July 18, Wasserman Shultz utilized false scare tactics on the House floor, to excoriate fellow Floridian Congressman West behind his back, for supporting the GOP Cut, Cap and Balance Act alleging that it would “end Medicare as we know it” in order to frighten senior citizens. Targeting West, she said: “Incredulously, the gentleman from Florida, who represents thousands of Medicare beneficiaries, as do I, is supportive of this plan that would increase costs for Medicare beneficiaries. Unbelievable for a member from South Florida.” She went on to play class warfare word games criticizing the bill for “rewarding the wealthy at the expense of our seniors and working families” just as did the Bush tax cuts, she claimed. Without the opportunity to defend himself on the floor, Congressman West immediately fired back a blunt email in response to this apparent stab in the back, after enduring a long string of insults from the congresswoman who serves in the neighboring district in South Florida.

In his email to Wasserman Shultz and the House leadership of both parties, he asked her to address her floor comments directly to his face, not after he departed, “otherwise, shut the heck up.” He said she is “the most vile, unprofessional, and despicable member of the US House of Representatives.” Referring to the history of her relentless past attacks, he asserted that she has proven repeatedly that she is “not a Lady” and he said “understand that I shall defend myself forthright against your heinous characterless behavior……which dates back to the disgusting protest you ordered at my campaign hqs, October 2010 in Deerfield Beach.”

The antagonism between Wasserman Shultz and West goes back to that date in the 2010 congressional campaign when she was an ally of West’s opponent former Rep. Ron Klein, (D-Fl) whom West defeated. It started when she led the protest rally outside the headquarters where she blasted his monthly columns in a biker magazine, “Wheels on the Road,” a publication which features some scantily clad women. During the rally she said: “He thinks it's OK to objectify and denigrate women. He thinks it's OK to take away our reproductive freedom. He thinks it's OK to associate with people who refer to women as oral relief stations.”

In addition to her continued smears as the West campaign began to mount a real threat to Klein’s seat, West’s comments are honest and right on the mark in characterizing Chairwoman Wasserman Shultz’s new role as attack dog of the DNC. She revoltingly played the race card recently, charging the GOP with racism for advocating new requirements for voters to show photo ID’s when registering to vote in order to combat rampant voter fraud, by saying Republicans “want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws.”

Jim Crow laws were discriminatory practices of the segregationist South after the period of Reconstruction which required blacks to sit in the back of buses and use separate restaurants, rest rooms and water fountains. It was a deliberate mean-spirited attack to compare these bigoted practices with the sensible GOP proposal to show photo ID’s, which are now required throughout society from the DMV to airports to the public library.

Her inflammatory performances accusing Republicans of racism and sexism make even fellow Democrats shudder. As her verbal assaults continue to fly, she stated that if they had the chance, Republicans would reinstate segregation and that they are “waging a war on women” while the facts show quite the opposite, that Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and other extraordinary women are the shining stars of the GOP today.

In an interview with Stuart Varney on the O’Reilly Factor on Fox News, Congressman West asserted that he would not apologize for his remarks. Both Varney and O’Reilly came to West’s defense saying he has the right to defend his honor against Wasserman Shultz. Most everybody else seems to think so, except for the liberal Democrats on Capitol Hill. In the latest poll of the Sun Sentinel, a South Florida newspaper with a largely Democrat reader base, over 11,000 readers responded to the question: “Has Allen West gone too far with his criticism of Debbie Wasserman Schultz?” 83% responded saying: “No way. Allen West says it like it is. You go, Congressman. We love you,” while only 2% responded saying: “Yes. West should publicly apologize immediately, if he has any class at all.”

However, Rep. Bruce Braley, (D-Iowa) is showing his support for Wasserman Shultz by wearing a pink button that reads “We Stand With The Lady” and made hundreds of them which he is distributing to congressional Democrats, who are likewise supporting Wasserman Shultz, some of whom are demanding an apology.

However this shows how the Democrats are out of touch with the public majority who see a man of character and principle standing up righteously to defend his honor, who should not apologize for his candid remarks. In fact the congressional Republicans should immediately break their silence and show their support for Congressman West by public statement or by distributing red, white and blue buttons that read: “We Stand With The Gentleman From Florida.”

Beyond the war of words between Wasserman Shultz and West, we see two diametrically opposed visions of America. Wasserman Shultz, a career politician has been living off the taxpayers since she began her career first as a Representative and later a Senator in the Florida State Legislature. She acts as the poster child for the blame and victimization games, often seen crying out for more at the public trough, aiming her animus at Republicans for throwing women, minorities, the poor and seniors under the bus. On the other hand West, who served his country for 22 years in the Armed Forces, a true leader of moral fiber and principle has a different vision of America, one that harkens back to our foundational and pioneering spirit as Americans. But he also is a man of honor who will fight back and valiantly stand against vile smears and despicable charades of political grandstanding and we need to show that we all stand with the gentleman from Florida. Contributor Phil Orenstein is a Republican County Committeeman from Queens, N.Y. and a manufacturing systems manager at Orics Industries Inc., NY. He blogs at

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 30, 2011


The Communists and Progressives efforts are to subvert us from the inside. The Political Correctness movement has given us the most incompetent President ever, in Barack Hussein Obama. The most Anti-American President ever! How could anyone doubt that statement?

Look at what he has done to America. He has Forced Obamacare down our throats. Then Soetoro, aka Obama has loaded the deck on very important Positions, with the most Radical, People who despise America. Coward Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Bill Ayers, Anti-American Military Elana Kagen, Odinga, Racist Sotomayor, the God hating Arlene Ocasio, Van Jones, Jeffrey Crowley, Richard Holbrooke, Carol Brower, Daniel Fried, Todd Stern, Herb Allison, John Brennan, Kevin Jennings, Regime Czar John Holdren and many more. Google any of these People and see their HATE for America, for Israel, For White People, Hate for Capitalism and on and on. This President said he would transform America and we are allowing him to do that. The Sheeple are scared or blind or ignorant or they are in the same belief system of Barry Sostoro.

Below is a list of 45 Commie goals that found their way into the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, you will see how they have played themselves out.

The List below is from "The Naked Communist," written by Cleon Skousen.

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
Sources at end.

In the early hours of November 22nd (1963) we learned of the quiet passing of C.S. Lewis and hours later we were brought to our knees when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated and our nation mourned.

On June 17, 1963 the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that any Bible reciting or prayer, in public schools, was deemed unconstitutional.

While American's have endured great prosperity over the past 40 years we have also lost our moral compass and direction. In reviewing the research, data supports 1963 as a focal point, demonstrating a downward slope in our moral and social decline through 2001.

Please click HERE for The Left Wing Agenda - Grinding America Down from our friends at Chuck On The Right Side.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 29, 2011

MORT's Meanderings:

A picture worth a thousand words?

"As crazy as it might sound, the cartoon on the Opinion page of the 7-26-2011 edition of the SunSentinel, proves the validity of that trite old adage: "A picture is worth a thousand words." By combining a simple line drawing and a few words of text, the Sentinel's resident political cartoonist Chan Lowe, managed to create a cartoon that would require a thousand words to fully explain. Cartoons are not supposed to create confusion on the part of the viewer.

I'll try in less than a thousand words, to give you an idea of how Lowe created the confusion. His drawing is divided into two halves by a vertical line down the center. On the left side, a 'Joe-6-pack-everyday-sorta-guy' is viewing the front page of his newspaper. The headline reads, "Norway Terrorist A Christian Radical". The guy comments: "First Oklahoma City, now this . . " On the right side of the cartoon, the same guy is depicted shouting, "They shouldn't be allowed to build churches in this country!" This is a clumsy attempt at drawing a parallel to the loudly-expressed opposition by seriously concerned citizens of neighborhoods all across this nation, to the unprecedented proliferation of Mosque-building in their midst. Some might have gotten that message but, I'm guessing that the majority of folks who viewed this over their morning coffee said, "Whaa-aa-at?"

Here's the background, I believe: Super-sized Mosques are being built in neighborhoods where there is currently scant demand for them but, where they are expected to soon be filled with a huge influx of Muslims, all praying five times a day. Prayer services and teachings are led by Imams of the 'religion of peace', espousing the dictates of Shariah - this is the restrictive doctrine that enforces its terms with a variety of brutal corporal punishments, including sanctioned killing. It is radical Islam's stated goal to replace the freedoms guaranteed under our Constitution of the United States of America, with an insanely rigid set of rules that must be followed to the letter by all Muslims, for fear of their own life and limb and that of their families. All infidels or non-believers are made to disappear.

I am hard put to understand how in this time of super-sensitivity to religious bigotry, this newspaper could approve a cartoon that is so blatantly offensive to Christians. Is anyone willing to bet their bottom dollar that such a cartoon would never have seen the light of day if the word had been 'Muslim' instead of 'Christian'? I'll cover that bet.

Political cartoons are ideally, supposed to combine an easily-comprehended drawing with a minimum of supporting text. If the cartoonist is sufficiently skilled at producing this delicate combination, the viewer will quickly, 'get the picture'. If on the other hand, the cartoonist lacks the ability to grasp the essence of the political situation he wants to depict, it is a given that he will not be able to translate an amorphous concept into a cartoon that will be easily understood by the average viewer. A good cartoon can be an effective tool for making a pointed statement; a bad cartoon only serves to muddle an issue by contributing to confusion on the part of those who view it.

"Viewing Lowe's stuff in the SunSentinel gives me the impression that most of the time, this guy is in over his head. And quite often he is in, waaa-ay over his head."

Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

MORT's Meanderings:

Did I write that?

There was a letter-to-the-editor published in the 7-24-2011 edition of the Palm Beach Post that bore a striking resemblance to a letter I had just submitted to that paper. (You might detect a wee bit of sarcasm, here.)

Several years ago, I decided that sending my impassioned letters to the SunSentinel or the Palm Beach Post was a total waste of effort and only led to elevated blood pressure. Who needs that?

However, I recently received a suggestion from another admirer of Allen West that I write a letter in support of West's response to Dumbie Wasserman Schultz's personal attack on our favorite Congressman. So, I wrote a letter to each of the local newsrags. On Sunday morning, July 24th, I received an e-mail from a friend, who congratulated me my letter in the Palm Beach Post. I had been unaware that my letter had been received, much less published. No doubt, an oversight on the part of the normally crack editorial staff of the PBPost.

Based upon my experience with letters-to-the-editor, I know of the 'rights' newspapers reserve (claim) for themselves and so jealously guard, to edit letters due to space limitations; to reject non-factual statements; to delete obscenities, name-calling and salacious remarks. Plus of course, they rigidly reserve the 'right' to create their own headlines and to place them over the letters they decide to publish. It's good to be King.

My letter appeared under the Post-created heading, "Wasserman Schultz a West attacker from the start". The amount of diddling the editor visited upon this letter went quite beyond all other diddling ever done to one of my letters-to-the-editor. Take a look at this sentence-by-sentence comparison:

MK: "I write in full support of Cong. Allen West and his long overdue response to the unfounded charges, outright lies and personal attacks Debbie W. Schultz has made and continues to make about this military hero and now, duly-elected Congressman from Florida's District 22."

PBP: "I write in full support of U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Plantation, and his long overdue response ("Apology not happening'. Friday article) to the unfounded charges, outright lies and personal attacks Rep. Debbie wasserman Schultz continues to make about this military hero, the duly elected congressman from Florida's 22nd District."

MK Comment: Since when does a newspaper have the right to inject a reference to one of their articles, in my letter to the editor? I don't consider my letter as their free billboard. Both the SunSentinel and PBPost insist on identifying Allen West as an 'R' from 'Plantation'. He resides in Plantation, FL, that's true. But, no geographical identification followed DWS's name. Hmm. I sincerely believe that this is a bit of cutsey-cutsey, oh-so-subtle racism that the left-biased editors of both newsrags find it almost impossible to resist using. If that is taken as an accusation, so be it. Plus, the editor failed to capitalize 'Congressman' however, that might well be a legitimate mistake.

MK: "Schultz wears two hats - one, the Chairwoman of the DNC appointed by Pres. Obama, the other, that of a Representative elected by the people of Florida's District 22 in 2005."

PBP: "Rep. Wasserman Schultz wears two hats - one, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, chosen by President Obama; the other, that of a representative elected by the people of Florida's 20th District in 2004."

MK Comment: I won't quibble with the PBPost editor's quibbling over the proper titles of elected officials - - Congressman (or Congresswoman -*sigh*) vs U. S. Representative - - sometimes capitalized, sometimes not. What do we know? We just elect them. By the way, I got the year of her election 2005, from Debbie's official website. If that's wrong, I'm wrong. And, what is the difference between my word, 'appointed', and the editor's replacement word, 'chosen'? I didn't submit my letter to have it re-interpreted or improved by 'the teacher'. Precisely who in the hell do these editors think they are? Apparently, they don't know the limits of their authority. Whomever this meddling 'quibbler' of an editor is, I hereby award him, her or it - with my most indignant, Harumph!)

MK: "She was obviously selected to lead the Democrat's effort to unseat Cong. West, using any tactics available.

PBP: "She was obviously selected to lead the Democrats' effort to unseat Rep. West, using any tactics available."

MK Comment: Minor correction in my punctuation. Score: PBPost 1, MK 0.


MK: "Congressional decorum or ethical comportment do not seem to be considerations in attaining that result."

PBP: "Congressional decorum or ethical comportment do not seem to be considerations in attaining that result."

MK Comment: Geesch! No change - and, there's nothing wrong with that.


MK: "Falsehoods, racism and personal attacks seem to be the tactics-of-choice of both the ousted former Congressman Klein and MizzSchultz."

PBP: "Falsehoods and personal attacks seem to be the tactics-of-choice of both the ousted Rep. Ron Klein and Rep. Wasserman Schultz."

MK Comment: Evidently, this statement set off all the alarm bells in the Editing Room and resulted in more than a tad of PBP editorial diddling. The word 'racism' was deleted from my sentence. I'd forgotten that this is a banned word that is deemed 'inappropriate' according to the respected Obama Lord&Master version of the U.S.Government's Lexicon of Politically Correct Terminology. My use of, 'ousted former' Congressman Klein too, must have hit a nerve. I guess that 'former' was deemed either redundant or 'inappropriate'. And for whatever reason, there seemed to be a need to insert 'Ron' in front of Klein. And finally, my creatively-sly use of 'MizzSchultz' must have appeared so disparaging to the editor(s) that it drove them over the edge. "Mission Accomplished"


MK: "Two peas in a pod. I believe that Cong. West just might heed Obama's recent advice to Republicans: "Eat your peas".

PBP: "Two peas in a pod. I believe that Rep. West might want to heed President Obama's recent advice on the budget, that it's time to "eat our peas".

MK Comment: More diddling here by the PBPost's editorial diddler. I wrote precisely what I intended to write and I quoted the President, accurately. The PBP editor in his, her or its wisdom, elected to rearrange my words and thus, their meaning. Okay. The Post's editorial staff runs the Opinion section of that paper but, they don't run me and they sure as hell don't run my keyboard.


Anyone care to venture a guess as to why I gave up writing 'letters-to-the-editor'?
Or, why I am hereby giving it up, once again?

MORT KUFF © 2011 7-26-2011

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

ELECTION 2012 IS COMING - Stop Marxism

A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!

Let's Take a stand and see America Rising Again!

Obama: Gone

Borders: Closed

Language: English only

Culture: Constitution and the Bill of Rights!!!

Drug Free: Make a drug screen mandatory for anyone on welfare and/or food stamps!

NO freebies to Non-Citizens!

We the people are coming.

Will ONLY 86% show this post to their Contacts? It Should be a 100%.

What will you do?

Hat Tip to Neil

Bookmark and Share

Soetoro and Holder Attack Legal Americans

Saul Alinski dedicated his "Rules for radical" book to Lucifer. So we should not be surprised at how Soetor0 and Coward Holder attack real Americans. They do support Traitors (Traitor Hassan), Terrorists, Hate Groups, ACORN and Black Panthers. The Liberals and so-called Moderates who put them in office are as guilty as they are. There was plenty of evidence this was the most Radical Left Wing candidate in the History of America, yet these Liberals and self-loathing Whites were too lazy to read about B. Hussein or just did not care. We will live with the results for years to come and 47% say they will re-elect him?

Obama DOJ Sues “Vocal and Aggressive” Pro Lifer

While Obama’s Justice Department dismissed a critical voter intimidation case against a radical black revolutionary group, it’s going after a pro life advocate the agency calls one of “the most vocal and aggressive anti-abortion protestors.”

Ironically, the administration claims that the pro life advocate, a Maryland man named Richard Retta, intimidated and interfered with women seeking abortions in Washington D.C.-area clinics much like members of the New Black Panther Party did to white voters during the 2008 presidential election. The difference is that the Black Panthers, clad in military attire, used weapons, racial insults and profanity to deter voters.

Judicial Watch obtained records that show political appointees at the DOJ ordered the Black Panther case dismissed after the administration colluded with leftwing groups. JW’s investigation also revealed that the official Obama appointed to head the DOJ’s civil rights division, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez, lied under oath to cover up the Black Panther voter intimidation scandal.
Now Perez is pursuing a pro lifer for violating a Clinton-era law (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act) that prohibits any sort of interference with a woman seeking an abortion. Retta physically obstructed a patient and volunteer escorts attempting to enter the Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, according to a DOJ complaint filed a few days ago. He also “frequently walks very closely beside patients as they walk to the clinic” and he follows them into the street and oncoming traffic. Sometimes he yells at them, the feds claim.

In announcing the lawsuit, Perez vowed to pursue similar cases, saying that “individuals who seek to obtain or provide reproductive health services have the right to do so without encountering hazardous physical obstructions.” If one unarmed guy is considered such a threat, then a barrier of big, muscular, armed men intimidating voters during a presidential election certainly merits attention from the agency charged with enforcing the law and defending the interests of the United States. Yet that case got dismissed.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 25, 2011

The Messiah Gives Our Money to Hate Groups

Barry Soetoro continues to cry about Debt problems. Well, maybe if he would not give billions who Hate Groups (La Raza, ACORN, etc) and People that were in the Shirley Sherrod Black farmer scam, there would be less debt problems. This is reparations and fuel the poor by taking away from the hard working middle class. Incompetent, Racist and vile is the only way to describe this failing Messiah.

Obama Gives Discriminated Hispanic, Women Farmers $1.3 Billion
A year after giving black farmers $1.25 billion to settle discrimination allegations against the government, the Obama Administration is promoting another huge minority cash giveaway for Hispanic and women farmers.

It’s part of the president’s continued efforts to write a new chapter for civil rights and resolve all allegations of past discrimination in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), according to an agency announcement issued this week. Women and Hispanics who feel the government discriminated against them when seeking USDA farm loans are encouraged to apply for cash to make up for Uncle Sam’s wrongdoing.

In all, the agency is allocating $1.33 billion in “compensation” for women and Hispanics in addition to $160 million in “farm debt relief.” Hispanic or women farmers who provide additional proof and meet other requirements can receive a $50,000 reward, according to the USDA announcement. The goal is to ensure that any Hispanic or woman farmer or rancher who alleges discrimination is aware of the money pot, says the USDA official in charge of the program.

To get the word out the feds have launched an impressive bilingual advertising and public relations campaign that includes national outreach tours by top USDA officials as well as Justice Department bigwigs because that agency is sort of overseeing it. The cash giveaway tour was in South Florida this week assuring that there is no filing fee or other costs to claimants who apply for money.
Those who can’t attend the USDA/DOJ outreach rallies can always register online or contact toll free a special Farmer and Rancher Call Center that will mail out a packet. The USDA has also created videos, in English and Spanish, to promote the program and it published a special flyer advertising the administration's latest civil rights reparation project.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 24, 2011

A Liberal Supermajority Not Faring Well in Norway

This article below is very informative and well written. As the great writer, James Lewis, points out that Saul Alinsky dedicated his book "Rules for Radicals" to Lucifer. Does that fact not tell the Liberals who they are dealing with when they support Obama? Many of the Left Wing Extremists know, as they believe in the same ideology, to punish America!

Pandora's Box in Norway
Written by James Lewis

If you destroy civilization, the monsters that fly out will surely destroy you. That is the lesson of the barbarian who killed almost one hundred innocents in Norway last week.

The Left will manage to blame the usual scapegoats, the way it always does. In fact, it is the Left itself that has opened Pandora's Box by systematically destroying the pillars of Western civilization, even bringing in Muslim terror preachers to speed up the destruction of civilized life. Saul Alinsky dedicated Rules for Radicals to Lucifer. Nothing better captures the destructive mind of the cultural Left, and we can see the results all around us.

Last week the Beast came to bite them back.

In recent years Norway has become famous for two supreme absurdities of Political Correctness: Algore's Nobel Prize for spreading the biggest scientific fraud in history, and Obama's Peace Prize for getting elected President -- in effect, Europe's tribute to the most radical Leftist in American history, merely for running while black.

However, if Herman Cain is elected president next year the Norwegian Peace Prize Committee will sit on its hands, because in Norway the only good black people are Leftist black people. The Left's compassion for victims is only for the ones who vote for them.

The Land of the Fjords has now turned into another paradise of PC perversity. But no PC idiocy can justify the regression to barbarism we saw last week, a crime that was supposedly done in the name of fighting the weird orthodoxies of PC. A crime is a crime is a crime. Terrorism against innocents is a crime. This was mass terrorism as surely as 9/11. It deserves a suitable punishment.

But Norway has no death penalty. Norwegian law can't even keep this murderous thug in jail for more than 21 years. Since the killer apparently dreams of starting a Knights Templar war against Islam and cultural Marxism, Norway's PC justice system will give him 21 years to write his manifesto while recruiting alienated skinheads for his cause. PC Norway may do itself in before it harms civilization much more.

Cultural Marxism is holding hands with the most malignant elements of radical Islam. What we saw last week was pure barbarism. I don't care how much this ruthless maniac claims to stand for European civilization, his actions make him a barbarian.

In the 18th century European civilization invented political liberty, just in time for the American founders to implement it on this continent. Continental Europe itself fell back into anarchy in the French Revolution, followed by Napoleon's imperialism. Napoleon killed so many Germans and Russians that he ignited a national revenge dynamic between Germany and France, triggering the Franco-Prussian War, World War I, and then the Second World War. Marxism-Leninism is merely another version of European Imperialism -- grandiose, superiorist, and willing to kill to conquer.

Soviet Imperialism fell apart with Gorbachev, but cultural Marxism has continued to make war on Western Civilization.

Last week the pendulum swung back. The monsters of Europe's past are growling again. The enemies of Europe are not its peaceful critics, but they will be blamed, because the Left always needs scapegoats. That's how Obama operates, and he learned his craft from Saul Alinsky, who learned it from the hard Left going back to Karly Marx.

When we see mob media in this country scapegoating Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Clarence Thomas, and anyone who questions the power of the Left, remember that socialism is a European invention. Marx, Lenin, and Stalin were Euro-socialists. Even Mao Zedong was a European export, once removed.

Millions of ordinary Europeans keep wondering what the hell is wrong with their ruling class, which has insulated itself against voter control. They are locked into power, just like Obama is trying to lock in Leftist power in the United States.

But the answer to Politically Correct barbarism is not more barbarism.

The answer is a return to civilized laws and values.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Allen West, a Hero and the Email

So we heard about the fire-storm on supporters (rancid kool-aid drinkers) of debbie lowlife Schultz attacking Allen West. The left is the Beast and they think they cam call Americans Nazis and Jim Crow supporters. Well the far left Nazis and Jim Crow supporters are DEMONcrats or Democrats, whatever you prefer. This Schultz is vile and Allen West tells the truth in his email. Why would he have to apologize for telling the truth and protecting his constituents. The Debbie dirtbag Schultz types are out to destroy the Middle Class. She does back Obamacare right?

Below is the email Rep. Allen West fired off tp respond to attacks by Schultz. People say he should just take the abuse from the Democrats as it is all just Politics. Well the Democratas have messed with the wrong guy. It is not just Politics, it's about America.

From: Z112 West, Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 04:48 PM
To: Wasserman Schultz, Debbie
Cc: McCarthy, Kevin; Blyth, Jonathan; Pelosi, Nancy; Cantor, Eric
Subject: Unprofessional and Inappropriate Sophomoric Behavior from Wasserman-Schultz

Look, Debbie, I understand that after I departed the House floor you directed your floor speech comments directly towards me. Let me make myself perfectly clear, you want a personal fight, I am happy to oblige. You are the most vile, unprofessional ,and despicable member of the US House of Representatives. If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face, otherwise, shut the heck up. Focus on your own congressional district!

I am bringing your actions today to our Majority Leader and Majority Whip and from this time forward, understand that I shall defend myself forthright against your heinous characterless behavior……which dates back to the disgusting protest you ordered at my campaign hqs, October 2010 in Deerfield Beach.

You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!

Steadfast and Loyal

Congressman Allen B West (R-FL)
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 21, 2011

MORT's Meanderings:

Debbie 'Whatevah' Schmutz:

Trashbag in Heels

Obama the Wise, knew precisely what he was doing when he pulled MizzSchmutz from the primordial ooze of the Florida Everglades and anointed her as the Dominate-tricks of the Democrat National Committee. Screaming-Mimi Schmutz is Howard Dean, in bitchy drag. Ain't she cool?

'Debbie Does Malicious' might be effective against run-of-the-mill Republicans however, when she pokes a finger in the eye of Retired U.S. Army LTC. Allen B. West, now Congressman West from Florida's District 22, she has to be ready for the heavy artillery he brings with him. MizzSchmutz will soon realize that the biggest gun Cong. West brings to a fight, is his superior intellect.

She and her sycophant supporters might be under the misapprehension that the target of her verbal venom Congressman West, has stolen the mainstay of Democrat rhetoric, name-calling. If that's what they think, they couldn't be more wrong. His use of descriptive terms such as, 'vicious' and 'despicable', in his now famous e-mail sent to her following her attack on him from the floor of the House of Representatives, is simply a spot-on accurate description of her behavior. Take another look at the videotape of her venomous diatribe. It is pure hate-speech on steroids. It's ugly.

Quite obviously, DWS is the designated leader of the orchestrated Democrat attack on Allen West by Obama and his band of freedom thieves. They are in mortal fear of this freshman Congressman. They know that this man has absolutely no fear of America's sworn enemies, whether they come garbed in Islamic cover-ups dating from the seventh century or, in finely-tailored suits accessorized by Gucci. The very mention of the name Allen West, strikes terror in their souls. Delicious!

They also know they cannot win on the merits of their leftist Liberalism. They've practiced their cruel tax & spend policies every time they've been able to dupe a majority of voters into handing over the control of our Federal Government. And every time, these policies have sunk us deeper in debt and indentured a large segment of our population to the government in the form of unconscionable entitlements. Plus, the implementation of these misguided, bankrupting policies inevitably leads to ever more wide-spread corruption. This particular brand of corruption seems to permeate even the very cornerstones of every Government edifice in our Nation's Capital.

And so, Debbie Whatevah and Obama Howevah and their legions of something-for-nothing complicit thieves of our freedoms and Liberty, are obliged to resort to their favorite tactics-of-choice: bald-faced lies; class warfare; racism; deceitful rhetoric; character assassination; name-calling and of course their all-time favorite - vicious verbage.

Rave on, Lunatics. You've poked your finger in the eye of the wrong retired-warrior-turned-Congressman, this time. Get ready to be out-maneuvered, out-smarted, over-whelmed, out-fought and mortally-wounded. You've initiated this battle and it might very well turn out to be the Waterloo of the Democrat Party. The only battle ribbons you can hope to be awarded for your efforts will be Band-Aids. And sadly for you and yours, they'll be awarded post-humously - - - so to speak.

Can you hear me now?

Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

MORT's Meanderings:

Not 'Fair & Balanced' but, 'Fully-reported', please.

The beat reporters in Washington, DC are just learning what the media in Florida's District 22 (Broward and Palm Beach counties) have known for the past several years. Congressman Allen West (R) is a rock-solid, dependable source for thoughtful assessments on the meaningful issues of the day. What's more, he delivers his thoughts in a clear and concise manner, using plain everyday English.

In a recent interview videotaped on Capitol Hill, the freshman Congressman issued the following statement. He didn't hesitate. He didn't qualify. He didn't equivocate. He simply said:

"The President needs to admit that his economic policies, his tax policies have failed this country."

It came as no surprise to this writer that Cong. West responded to each of the interviewer's questions directly and to the point, with military precision. Nearly all his issue-oriented responses include an example to illustrate his point, that is invariably accompanied by supporting facts and figures.

He does his homework, studies the issues and forms his assessments based upon realistic appraisals and careful analysis. His decisions are arrived at based upon his underpinnings of strong religious faith, ethical principles and his respect for the sworn oath he has taken at each stage of his career to defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States of America.

My question is:

When the totality of factual information on an issue is researched, absorbed, analyzed and used to arrive at a thoughtfully considered assessment that is based upon sound logic, Constitutional principles and has the expressed support of a majority of the American public, do we really need an opposing viewpoint - simply to satisfy somone's notion of, 'fair and balanced'?

There is no question that issues affecting the lives and well-being of America's citizens must be thoroughly discussed in the public forum. 'Fully-reported' information is key to all such discussions. The 'fair and balanced' approach to discussions, particularly on those "We're-almost-out-of-time" TV panel shows driven by dictatorial moderators, are seldom either fair or balanced. Shouted partisan talking points and ear-splitting cacophony in the form of 'everybody-talk-at-once' sessions, invariably muddy the waters rather than providing clear, concise viewpoints (think, Congressman Allen West). Food for thought should be palatable and nourishing. There are no known cases of anyone ever having become obese from ingesting too much food for thought. (Michelle Overbearing, take note)

It seems to me that if an issue has been thoroughly discussed by serious people - and there is majority concurrence that a reasonable, workable, fair resolution has been arrived at on the matter, further jaw-boning is contra-indicated. In other words, to drone on and on with countering viewpoints presented just for the 'contention' value they might offer is in my view, cruel and unusual punishment.

As my wise Father told me on more than one occasion, "Son, when you've finished what you have to say, sit down".

I'm sitting, Dad.

Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011

Bookmark and Share

Allen West Refuses To Back Down from Racist Democrats

Allen West Refuses To Back Down After Email Calling Wasserman Schultz “Vile, Despicable And Cowardly"

This is what we need. A Real Conservative Politician with a backbone. Forget the Politically Correct garbage and bowing to lowlife Left Wing Marxists and Nazis.

Rep Allen West proudly served in Afghanistan and in Iraq. He is not afraid of this Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The Democrats and their scare tactics do not work on real Conservatives, yes the real Americans who criticize the incompetent President Soetoro.

WASHINGTON — Republican Rep. Allen West of Florida is standing by an incendiary email he sent to a Democratic colleague after she criticized him in a speech on the House floor.

“I think it’s important to stake my ground,” West told Fox News when asked about his email to Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee. “It was about enough is enough, and it’s my right to say that. She is the one elevating this.”

West’s email called Wasserman Schultz “vile, despicable and cowardly” after she called into question his stance on Medicare during the debate over a spending cap and balanced budget bill before the House.

In her remarks on the House floor, Wasserman Schultz had said: “The gentleman from Florida, who represents thousands of Medicare beneficiaries, as do I, is supportive of this plan that would increase costs for Medicare beneficiaries. Unbelievable from a member from south Florida.”

She was alluding to a GOP-backed bill to reduce the debt and amend the Constitution to require a balanced federal budget. The House later approved the bill 234-190, but it is unlikely to pass the Democratic Senate.

West, who is in his first term, wasn’t shy about his online outburst. He sent his email to numerous lawmakers, as well as Wasserman Schultz and other congressional leaders. The subject line of the email: “Unprofessional and Inappropriate Sophomoric Behavior from Wasserman Schultz.”

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

MORT's Meanderings:

Where are the Adults?

The headline on the front page of the 7-18-2011 edition of the SunSentinel declared, "Casey Anthony's location unknown". Is this really headline news? Is this what we should be concerned about? Seriously?

I ask you, Where are the adults?

We seem to be so preoccupied with meaningless drivel such as this sordid case and so much of what passes for entertainment or news, that it brings into question whether there are any serious adults left in this country?

The first definition of 'adult', according to my copy of the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language is: "One who has attained maturity or legal age". Reading the newspapers, watching the 'news' on the tube and listening for serious or meaningful conversations at gatherings in contemporary American society, leads me to this conclusion: Apparently, most who have attained 'maturity or legal age', accept the truths as presented by the Harry Potter films and those presented in The Holy Bible as equally authoritative gospel.

Seeking more comfort from my dictionary, I proceeded to the second definition of, 'adult'. Here it is, verbatim:
"A fully grown, mature organism, such as an insect that has completed its final stage of metamorphosis."
Ah, that's more like it.

The final definition of, 'adult' simply reads: "to grow up". Now, why in hell didn't they say that in the first place?
Let me shout that out to all mature, legal age Americans, "GROW UP!" Can you hear me, now?


Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011

Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 18, 2011


This is a true story and the author, Rick Mathes, is a well-known leader in prison ministry.

The man who walks with God always
gets to his destination. If you have a
pulse you have a purpose.

The Muslim religion is the fastest
growing religion per capita in the
United States, especially in the
minority races!

Last month I attended my annual
training session that's required for
maintaining my state prison
security clearance.

During the training session there was a
presentation by three speakers
representing the Roman Catholic,
Protestant and Muslim faiths,
who each explained their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in
what the Islamic had to say.

The Muslim gave a great presentation
of the basics of Islam, complete
with a video.

After the presentations, time was
provided for questions and answers.
When it was my turn, I directed
my question to the Muslim and asked:
'Please, correct me if I'm wrong,
but I understand that most Imams and
clerics of Islam have declared
a holy jihad [Holy war] against the
infidels of the world and, that by
killing an infidel,
(which is a command to all Muslims)
they are assured of a place in heaven.
If that's the case, can you give me
the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my
statements and, without hesitation,
he replied, 'Non-believers!'
I responded, 'So, let me make sure
I have this straight. All followers of
Allah have been commanded to kill
everyone who is not of your faith so
they can have a place in heaven.
Is that correct?'

The expression on his face
changed from one of authority
and command to that of a
little boy who had just been
caught with his hand
in the cookie jar.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have
a real problem trying to
imagine The Pope commanding
all Catholics to kill those of
your faith or Dr.Stanley ordering
all Protestants to do the same
in order to guarantee them
a place in heaven!'
The Muslim was speechless!

I continued, 'I also have a
problem with being your friend
when you and your brother clerics
are telling your followers to
kill me! Let me ask you a question:
Would you rather have your Allah,
who tells you to kill me in
order for you to go to heaven,
or my Jesus who tells me to
love you because I am going
to heaven and He wants you
to be there with me?'

You could have heard a pin
drop as the Imam hung his
head in shame.

Needless to say, the organizers
and/or promoters of the
'Diversification' training seminar
were not happy with my way
of dealing with the Islamic Imam,
and exposing the truth
about the Muslims' beliefs.

In twenty years there will be
enough Muslim voters in the
U.S. to elect the President!

I think everyone in the U.S.
should be required to read this,
but with the ACLU, there is no
way this will be widely
publicized, unless each of us
sends it on! This is your chance
to make a difference....

FOR CHRIST'S SAKE, Please pass this on!

Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 15, 2011

My Census Form

They sent my Census form back!! AGAIN!!!!! In answer to the question, "Do you have any dependents?" I put ....... 12 million illegal immigrants, crack heads, unemployable bastards, the cast of The Jerry Springer Show, 140,000 people in our 133 penal establishments in California , leftovers from Katrina, half of Mexico, some of the Congress and most of the Senate.

................. Apparently this wasn't an acceptable answer.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Racial Mob Violence - MSM is Silent

We want to draw attention to this very informative article below written by John T. Bennett. Our Stop Marxism staff knows all to well the results of Political Correctness and Hate Crimes against Whites, Jews and Asians. The Media is in bed with the Marxist Regime and Barry Soetoro and Coward Holder. where are all the calls for Resignations? O yea, that cannot happen with a so-called Black President or Attorney general who loves Terrorists and Black panthers. These sicko self-loathing Whites will cower in the corner until they are beaten by a Flash Mob. Some of our Stop Marxism staff has associates who were attacked in new York by the coward in a Flash Mob. The majority of these Flash Mobs is just Hate for non-Blacks.

The Knockout Game: Racial Violence and the Conspicuous Silence of the Media

Article written By John T. Bennett

By now, almost everyone has seen one of the semi-amusing videos of black teen mobs rampaging through a store. Maybe we've even seen the non-amusing pictures of the victims, or heard their stories. Most Americans have heard of recent violent "flash mobs," which are the bands of black teens that attack mostly white victims and white businesses, as even the New York Times once noted.

But the flash mobs, which are more accurately called "race riots" or "racial mob violence," are not the only interesting topic to cover in our national conversation about race. There is also the "knockout game," which is stunning in its brutal simplicity and stark racial significance.

The knockout game involves "unprovoked attacks on innocent bystanders," according to police who have had to deal with it. A retired officer explained, "Normally it was a group of black males, one of which would strike him as hard as he could in the face, attempting to knock him out with one punch," says retired Sgt. Don Pizzo. The victims are typically not robbed, but simply punched with no provocation. Such attacks have been reported in Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, and New Jersey.

The knockout game has claimed at least one life so far. In St. Louis this year, 72-year old Hoang Nguyen was walking with his wife, Yen, when four "young people" attacked. The attacker pushed the old man's face to the side to make a "clear target for his fist," recalled his wife. Nguyen was punched so hard that he fell to the ground and struck his head. Then the attacker turned on Nguyen's 59-year-old wife, punching her so hard that she suffered a broken eye socket. She could only watch as her husband was then kicked repeatedly. Hoang succumbed to his injuries later that day. A young black male, 18-year-old Elex Murphy, is charged with first-degree murder.

In addition, a mob of young black males can be seen playing the game here. The video shows the group attacking a young white man named Adam Taylor, who was left with internal bleeding, bruising of the brain, severe whiplash, and scratches on his face when he was beaten in Columbia, MO in 2009.

Sgt. Pizzo noted that the attacks fit a pattern: "black attackers on a white victim -- and the victim was often an older person walking alone." In a thorough and sensible piece on the subject in a local arts and entertainment magazine, eight of the victims interviewed were white, one was black, and one was Latino. All of the attackers, or "players," were black. Some witnesses claim that they have white relatives who play the game and that therefore the game is not a racial issue. But anyone who reviews the reporting -- when race is revealed, at least -- will see that the attackers are predominantly if not exclusively black.

As one player of the game says, "[w]e used to walk to where a lot of people be at and hit 'em. If one of the homeboys didn't knock him out, then the other would come. Whoever knock him out would be king."

Local media outlets have failed to report on the racial aspect of the attacks. At best, the media will allow the race of attackers to be revealed by mugshots, or quotations from police or victims. This follows a conscious policy of self-censorship that has been openly admitted by major newspapers.

A New York Times editor says that his paper will report on race "only if it's relevant to the story" or if readers would "learn something" from the description. The Chicago Tribune's editor, Gerould Kern, explains his paper's "approach" to concealing the truth: "We do not reference race unless it is a fact that is central to telling the story." Of course, no guilt-ridden white liberal editor will ever admit that race is relevant, unless of course a white is attacking minorities. The Los Angeles Times explains that the media will not report race because they don't want to "unfairly stigmatize racial groups." The Washington Post ombudsman openly admits that the Times's staff "worried about hyping a story that involved race" when blacks brawled on the Metro. Instead of stigmatizing racial groups, the liberal media prefers to condemn minorities via low expectations and preferential, secretive reporting -- which only creates a cloud of ominous suspicion over the race issue. But at least racial groups aren't being stigmatized.

A senior reporter from the Houston Chronicle admits, "We don't ever include race normally -- unless race is made an issue by other people." In other words, if racial interest groups make something of the issue, race will become part of the story. And we all know which racial groups advocate on their own behalf, and which one doesn't.

The liberal media policy of resolute silence about race and crime may strike a reasonable observer as troubling, given the violence and obvious racial aspect of the knockout game and flash mob attacks. The net effect of this Orwellian reporting is to place minority feelings above the public interest in safety. For those of us who are curious about our society and group behavior, who should be able to rely on the professional media, the reporting is worthless.

When the liberal media does touch on the topic of race and flash mobs, it is only to condemn conservative blogs for mentioning race at all. The Village Voice, for instance, thoughtlessly dismisses the concerns about racial mob violence, reasoning that because crime is falling, racial mob violence shouldn't be criticized. The progressive tendency will be to define these stories as isolated incidents -- it is easy extrapolate a social problem, but that could be misleading in the big picture.

But the knockout game must be seen in the context of black-on-white violence in America. The big picture is that black-on-white violence is a social problem that deserves more attention, regardless of whether the overall crime rate is rising or falling. Department of Justice statistics show that 33% of white murder victims are killed by a non-white, while only 8% of black murder victims are killed by a non-black1. Even greater disparities exist in violent crime and robbery2.

Some of those who work with these kids blame boredom and the kids' need to prove their toughness. Those causes will be present for a long time, thus the problem will remain. Moreover, the problem will predictably get worse, as some of the mobs are armed.

Hoang Nguyen will not receive the same attention as Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. After all, Hoang was not the victim of white hatred, so he is not a household name...but he should be.

Written by written By John T. Bennett

1Violent State Prisoners and Their Victims, Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics 5, July 1990 quoted in James B. Jacobs and Kimberly Potter, Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics 17 (1998).

2Ibid., 17.

John Bennett (MA, University of Chicago, MAPSS '07) is a veteran, writer, and law student at Emory University living in Atlanta, GA.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

MORT's Meandering​s - 7/13/2011

Michelle Obama: A glutton for gluten

For some strange reason, I'm reminded of that hoary nursery rhyme:

"Jack sprat could eat no fat, his wife cold eat no lean."

Anyway you look at it, Michelle Obama is a monument to bad taste.

Whether it is in her pretentious public pronouncements; her unflattering funky fashions; her less-than-genteel societal behavior; her overbearing boorishness; her mindless pre-occupation with other people's eating habits; her non-stop slopping at the Government trough as she indulges her every whim and fantasy, at tax-payer's expense; or from my point of view, her choice of husband. While I guess it could be said that for her that latter choice worked out pretty well - for the rest of us - not so much.

After this Awful Precedent and his Foisted Lady are finally evicted from the White House, that venerable 'People's House' will have to be fumigated. Our nation's suffering has been intense and sadly, our proud national symbol will have to tented to remove the taint.

Elections have consequences. The painful lessons we're learning with each passing hour are all the proof conscious folks should need in order to recognize that this is true.

Would it be imprudent of me to remind all our dear readers of the upcoming Presidential election in November 2012?

Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

MORT's Meanderings


The Opinion page of the 7/11/2011 SunSentinel featured a letter from a particularly delusional Dem, who implored President Barack Hussein Obama to, ".. educate the electorate of the importance of voting for their interests and not the interests of the super rich."

Speaking for myself as a committee of one, I want to publicly go on record that I am now further convinced - higher education isn't for everyone. In point of fact, I believe that it can be a major contributor to a syndrome I refer to as, *"Left-headed thinking". The writer of this **'Litter-to-the-Editor' proves my theory.

While Obama-the-Infallable is an acknowledged wiz at reading speeches off Teleprompters; pontificating from the podium with amorphous examples in support of his muddled messages; and pursuing his compulsion for class warfare, pointing the finger of blame and failed-policy rhetoric - an 'educator', he ain't.

Just two of his more ignominious verbal gaffs, '57 states' and 'Navy Corpse-man' are sufficient proof for me, that education - even undocumented higher education - isn't for everyone.

It has been said that - "Those who can - do; those who can't - teach".
While that is obviously untrue in the majority of cases, in the case of our Edumacater-in-Chief, it does seem particularly appropriate.

Conservative Commentary by MORT KUFF © 2011 7/11/2011

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Reclaim America - Fire Barry

Obama now is crying, but not for the Texas teenage girl whom was raped and murdered; Obama cries for the animal Humberto Leal. Obama and the Left Wing Democrats are set up to do severe damage to America.

The aim of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union,, the Center for American Progress, the Media Matters for America and other such extremist left-wing organizations is to destroy Capitalism and America as we know it. Even CAIR attempts to use America’s freedoms as a weapon against her. All the while the Appeaser in Chief (BHO) supports these wacko groups, as he flies all over the World spending our money. It is time to Wake Up America!

Hat Tip to Mr. I
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Obama Scrapped President Bush's Missile Defense Plan

We want to show you this excellent article below as it shows the results of how Barry Soetoro came out of the gates. Soetoro jumped onto the scene with his Kenyan attitude and set out to punish the Allies of America. England, Poland, Israel and others would be treated like cast-offs from a failed BET Network TV show. We could go on in analyzing the Regime's outreach to Dictators in Cuba, Iran and Venezuela but the Mass still shows support for Obama? The Racist Democrats and white-guilt ridden Masses support this Regime's attack on our Country and Allies.

The article below was written by by Zbigniew Mazurak.

Obama Administration's missile defense proposal 'simply not credible'
Written by Zbigniew Mazurak

In 2009, the Obama Administration scrapped President Bush's plans for missile defense in Europe in an unprecedented act of capitulation to Russia, thus alienating two allies (Poland and the Czech Republic) with whom Washington had signed missile defense hosting agreements just a year earlier.

At the time, the Administration, including then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, claimed that intelligence data indicated that Iran was now developing short-range instead of long-range ballistic missiles and that therefore the systems envisioned by Bush (a radar in the Czech Republic and 10 Ground Based Interceptors in Poland, also known as "third site elements") were not needed. Instead, Gates and Obama offered the deployment of Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)-capable ships and, in the 2018-2020 timeframe, ground-based SM-3 Block IIB interceptors (which have yet to be developed and constructed) intended to intercept long-range ballistic missiles.

At the time, it was already known that such a plan would be 2 times more costly than the Bush plan and would not offer coverage early enough; Iran already possessed, as of 2009, BM25 Musudan-ri IRBMs capable of reaching all European capitals (including London, Dublin, and Lisbon), and the Obama Administration knew this, as cables published by WikiLeaks reveal. CIA veteran Reza Kahlili confirms this. US intel also says that Iran will have ICBMs capable of reaching the United States by 2015.

Last month, testifying before Congress, Secretary Gates lied further, claiming that execution of the Bush Administration's plan was "never going to happen" because, supposedly, Poland and the Czech Republic refused to sign hosting agreements. But this is a blatant lie. In August 2008, Condoleezza Rice, then Secretary of State, signed the relevant agreements with Poland and the Czech Republic. And no sooner was the ink dry that the Vice Chief of the Russian General Staff, threatened these countries with "100% certain" nuclear attack if the third site elements are built.

But, as a recent Defense Science Board (DSB) report reveals, it is the Obama Admin's plan that is unrealistic and unexecutable. The report is classified and only unclassified portions of it have been released and submitted to Congress. Sen. Richard Shelby has obtained a copy.

The DSB dismisses Obama's plan as "simply not credible", saying that the planned SM-3IIB missiles - which currently don't exist and have yet to be constructed and tested - will not be able to intercept enemy missiles in the boost (earliest) phase of flight, as they are being designed to do. Thus, the Obama Administration has bet European missile defense on a nonexistent missile that will never be able to do its job.

By contrast, Bush wanted to deploy existing, tested, proven Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) mid-course interceptors in Poland, the same kind of missiles that are already stationed in Alaska and California. They intercept missiles in the mid phase of flight.

In any case, Central Europe is so far away from the Middle East that any missiles launched from there could intercept ballistic missiles only in the mid phase - exactly as GBIs are designed to do.

Meanwhile, the Czech Republic is so annoyed by how it's been treated by the Obama Administration that it has refused to cooperate in its new BMD scheme. Even if a Republican Administration takes office after 2012, it will be difficult to regain the Czechs' trust.

And Russia? It's still not satisfied. It wants to see no missile defense systems in Europe, and President Medvedev has threatened a new Cold War and a new arms race (typical Russian bluff, but nonetheless telling) if any such systems are deployed. Obama's arms control chief Ellen Tauscher, a longtime opponent of a strong defense in general and missile defense in particular, is drawing up secret agreements with Russia to drastically limit such systems. And Russia's ambassador has dismissed the potential Iranian threat as nonexistent, at the same time his country is helping to grow that threat.

In short, Obama's missile defense plan is bad news. He has scrapped plans to deploy proven, tested interceptors, revoked signed agreements as if they were worthless pieces of paper, alienated 2 allies, and pushed forward a plan based on nonexisten systems that, as the DSB tells Congress, won't work, thus making the Obama plan "simply not credible."

Therefore, Congress should:

1) 1). Hold hearings on this issue and call on high-ranking Administration officials, as well as independent witnesses, such as former Missile Defense Agency Director LTG Henry Obering (ret.) and think-tank analysts, to testify.

2) 2). Refuse to provide funding for the PAA, or "Phased Adaptive Approach," which the DSB says is "simply not credible".

3) 3). Obligate the Administration, by law, to provide coverage to the US and Europe against all classes of ballistic missiles (not just SRBMs as Gates wanted) using proven, existing systems, as well as the promising systems scrapped in 2009 by Gates.

If If the Administration vetoes such legislation, let it put itself on record as overtly opposing plans to protect America. Then, the American people can vote accordingly.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Non-Jew Supporting Prime Minister Netanyahu Not Obama

Dear Rabbi Bruce Warshal:

As a non-Jew reading your column in the Jewish Journal (June 22, 2011), I can't believe how blind you are to the realities of the world and to the Middle East in particular.

P.M. Netanyahu, as opposed to your position, is looking out for the citizens of Israel, not playing to the liberal left in his country and ours. Why is negotiation always a one-way street, whereby Israel must give up something, but the Palestinians don't have to give anything in return? They won't even give up the fact that Israel exists and that it should be free from terrorist attacks.

You forgot to mention that in Obama's "road map" for peace, he said Israel should go back to the 1967 borders and negotiate with the Palestinians (with Hamas included at the table) with "mutually agreed upon land swaps". The catch word here is "mutually", which means that if one party does not agree there can be no land swaps. Meanwhile, Israel then must work through the idea that the 1967 borders are a legitimate bargaining chip that cannot be agreed upon, but gives credence to the borders as of 1967. As P.M. Netanyahu said, that's like Israel committing suicide.

How can you be so naive to assume that you can negotiate with an adversary who wants you dead and Israel destroyed? You and your fellow liberal rabbi's are blinded to the facts by your far-left liberal ideology. God help Israel if "wusses" like you ever attain the majority in Israel. You should be ashamed, as you would throw Israel under the bus just like your fellow appeaser, Barack Hussein Obama, but then again it looks like you and Obama have no shame.


Chuck On The Right Side
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 5, 2011


Dear Abby,

My husband has a long record of money problems. He runs up huge credit-card bills and at the end of the month, if I try to pay them off, he shouts at me, saying I am stealing his money. Says pay the minimum and lets our kids worry about the rest, but already we can hardly keep up with the interest. Also he has been so arrogant and abusive toward our neighbors that most of them no longer speak to us.

The few who do are an odd bunch, to whom he has been giving a lot of expensive gifts, running up our bills even more. Also, he has gotten religious. One week he hangs out with Catholics and the next with people who say the Pope is the Anti-Christ, and the next he's with Muslims.

Finally, the last straw. He's demanding that before anyone can be in the same room with him, they must sign a loyalty oath. It's just so horribly creepy! Can you help?


Lost in DC

Dear Lost:

Stop whining, Michelle. You're getting to live in the White House for free, travel the world, and have others pay for everything for you. You can divorce the jerk any time you want. The rest of us are stuck with the SOB for two more years!



Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 4, 2011

Remember The Meaning of Independence Day - Reclaim America

This has been bothering me for some time and I must address it. This Pierce MorganS guy comes to our Country and insults our traditions? How much money has this Limousine Liberal made off of America? He attacks the Cowboy Hat of John Rich. John Rich is a true American and let this slide as he was helping other People, not just himself. Did Pierce MorganS attack little John for his Dreads?

Send this Pierce MorganS back to Ireland or England or better yet, boot his arse back to Iran. Let the Country Club LIBERAL Pierce MorganS tell some Guy in Iran that the Towel On His Head is very ANNOYING! The Iran People would stone him and feed him to the Goats.

Forget the debt crisis, the budget, the Job Killer EPA growing by 125%, illegal Obamacare, the failing economy and millions of unemployed Americans. All of the White People must be quiet or you are Racist! Let the Community Organizer destroy the Country, you White People just have to give him a chance? NO!

We like Allen West for his ideas, service to the Country and his love of America. We do not care about the color of his skin. We like Michele Bachmann for her intelligence, her fight for what is RIGHT for America! We do not care about the color of her skin!

We have too many Americans cowering to Political Correctness and the Limousine Liberals. There is no further evidence than having People elect the most Racist, Anti-American President simply for the color of his skin. So today on Independence Day let us be reminded that our Fore Fathers fought the Pierce MorganS types and Big Government to start this Great Country. Please do not cower in the corner and hand it over to Radical islam, Big Government and Marxist Liberals.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Marxist Chicago Politics and Democrat Cesspool

Just Business As Usual in the Windy City !

Now that Rahm Emanuel is mayor, and with his close ties to Obama, things could get even worse !

My, My don't we have the highest standards. What a cesspool Chicago politics is.
You can't make up stuff better than this!

Isn't politics grand?
Hurray FOR THE DEMOCRATS! Democrats allow and support Black People who are racists.

Jesse Jackson's Newest Staff Member:

Mel Reynolds

Jesse Jackson has added former Chicago Democrat Congressman Mel to Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll. Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud,
and lies to the Federal Election Commission.

He is more notorious, however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.

This is a first in American politics:
An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate
...won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate
...then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate!

His new job? Ready for this??

YOUTH COUNSELOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, July 2, 2011

The Demise of One Time Icons

It is quite troubling for me to understand why so many editorial
boards of leading newspapers and other journalist media outlets follow the
liberal line. It's a dangerous road to take because through history, I have
learned their influence sways disgruntled masses into mobs giving rise
to totalitarian governments
that take advantage of the turmoil to make
changes detrimental to our freedoms. Using the first amendment irresponsibly
will lose it for all of us.

It doesn't take long for the press to lose independence and become a tool
of government. Maybe a few proponents of drastic liberalism might retain
their positions because they tow the line of state run media. Patsies for

We know who the very liberal main stream media and publications patsies
are in this country, because their views are one sided biased commentaries
that won't allow fair and balanced disagreement. I tried many times to have
my letters to the editor accepted for publication, including this one, to no avail.

My right to express freedom of speech is unacceptable, because it is contrary to
what they preach; therefore I am denied access to contrast my views against
theirs so that their readers and listeners can have a broader opinion view to
judge for themselves. An occasional conservative commentary is sometimes thrown
in to obviously quell criticism.

Publishers and producers do not realize the implication this one sided,
liberal left position can take for their very existence. They are
shooting themselves in the foot. As it is, dwindling circulations
and audiences are taking their toll on these left of center vehicles.

In a similar state is the mainstream broadcasters, CNN and MSNBC. Combined,
they do not enjoy the audience Fox News commands. What do some of these names
have in common? Leslie Marshall, Steve Murphy, Mo Elliethee, Doug Schoen, Lanny
Davis, Alan Colmes, Kristen Powers. Bob Beckel, Michael Brown, Penny Lee, Charlie
Rangel, Al Sharpton and Tamara Holder. They are just a small list of Liberal
Democrats that have appeared on Fox to defend their position. Also employed
by Fox are Juan Williams, Geraldo Rivera and Greta Van Susteren. The full
list would be impossible to fit in these pages. No member of congress is
denied access to Fox and many have taken advantage of it.

Some members of congress are fighting to pass a fairness act;
George Soros and a tax exempt organization Media Matters, funded
by him and the broadcasters mentioned above all want to destroy
Fox News for broadcasting what they choose to ignore because it
is contrary to their agendas and exposes the flaws of the
current administration.

Conservative Commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 1, 2011

Progressives War on Food?

We have another repose from Chuck On The Right Side to the Left Wing Marxist so-called Main Stream Media. We have the Food NAZI Michelle Nobama out there attacking Chubby Kids. The Food Nazi even did a semi-Alec Baldwin and attacked her Daughters. The wannabe Alec Baldwin, Food Nazi Michelle told millions of People that her daughters were chubby. Those poor kids! They have a Father who subjects them to people like Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, rashid khalidi and is destroying their Country. Then they have a Mom who calls them overweight for all to hear.

Well the Left Wing Marxist cannot make up their minds, as they say this week the 15 Million kids have no food?

Dear Rachel Patron:

Isn't it amazing that your column entitled, "Can America sacrifice 15 million hungry kids", can come up with the figure that there are 15 million hungry kids in America? Where did you get this "assumed" figure, from one of the "loony liberal" left websites? Could it not have been 5, 10, 20, or 25 million, or for that matter 100? Who determined that figure of "assumed" hungry children, some Saul Alinsky acolyte trying to put America in a bad light? C'mon Rachel, you should know better than that. Most people are not that gullible or stupid enough to believe that crap.

With all the government help that's available to people and poor people in particular, it is almost impossible to have starving (hungry) children in our midst. We all have been hungry at one time or another in our lives, but to imply that we have a vast army of hungry children is preposterous. Have you seen the size and girth of the children in poor neighborhoods lately? They don't have an under nourishment problem, they have an obesity problem. Many of those "hungry" children come from families that have cars, LCD T.V.'s, cell phones, $150 Nike sneakers, and tattoos to go along with their "empty bellies". I know I'll be classified as being heartless and callous by pooh-poohing your claims of sacrificing hungry children by society, and by politicians who are only looking out to balance the damn budget as these millions of children starve. Hogwash! I will not succumb to the "political correctness" norms put forth by the liberals and neither should you.

Your liberal (or is it Progressive?) slant on this matter is typical of the continuous liberal attack on Republicans, Conservatives, and common sense. The canard that only liberals have the sensitivity and compassion to understand the plight of the poor is downright insulting. It has been your policies starting back in FDR's time and the start of LBJ's "War on Poverty" that has added to our social problems by making more and more people dependent on the government for handouts. Your rant in this column is just that - another anti-American bashing with no basis in fact except some pulled out of the air erroneous figures to justify a non-existent problem.

Is this the kind of rhetoric we can expect from the liberals in this upcoming election season? Already the "class warfare" banner has been unfurled by the Democrats as they can't possibly run on their dismal economic record and failed foreign policy. Make as many of the people dependent on the government to gain their votes, and make the successful (the rich) their oppressors, will be the modus operandi of these self-styled hypocrites called Democrats. I predict that this tactic will fail and we will have a change in leadership for the better in 2012.


Chuck On The Right Side
Bookmark and Share