Monday, February 28, 2011

Obama's Juggling Act

When I was a kid, I can remember going to the circus and seeing a juggling act.
The juggler started out with 3 balls, then added another to the applause of the audience. He then added another; spurred on by the applause, another then another until there were too many balls to juggle and the balls scattered everywhere.

Washington is a circus and the juggler is the President. When he entered the center
ring, our national debt was approximately 10.625 trillion dollars. Spurred on by liberal left applause, the debt has risen to almost 14.082 trillion. Almost at the point when it will be impossible to manage, especially when the juggler promises to add more to his act.

If he does, the balls will most certainly scatter, and the tax payer. his children and his children's children will be left to pick up the pieces.

Conservative Commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Tree Huggers

On January 8th, a depraved man shot and wounded Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords,
slaying six others, among them a judge and a 9 year old little girl. The very vocal Liberals wasted no time accusing conservative talk show and the 2nd amendment as the cause in vitriolic terms, that hasn't ceased despite useless rhetoric to quash it.

If you listen to them, it won't be long before we have to walk to the market or butcher store and ask the butcher to tear a piece of our choice of meat off the carcass and learn how to dice vegetables, peel fruit and eat with our hands, because utensils are dangerous.

I recall on February 12th, Maksim Gelman went on a rampage, stabbing to death his step-father, ex-girlfriend and her mother, running down a pedestrian in a stolen car and slashing four other innocent bystanders. By doing a web search on stabbings, you will be surprised to learn how many more stabbings there are than shootings.

If the Tucson massacre is an indication that guns caused the Tucson tragedy, then cars and knives have to be included for causing the slaughter in New York. If liberal mind set blames guns, then cars and knives must also be outlawed.

When tree huggers accept the fact that these are weapons of choice, not instruments looking for somebody to use them. It will be nice if they focus on depriving Islamic Sharia-ists of rocks.

Conservative Commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Union Dos and Don'ts

The fiasco spilling out of Wisconsin into other states shouts for economic reform.
We voted to have our elected official running for, not running from solving the
financial predicament many states are in.

Much of today's improved working conditions can be attributed to the unions, but
they have also created an imbalance between the public and private sector. It is
not unreasonable to ask the public sector to contribute toward their retirement
fund and health services. Collective bargaining for government employees has to
be altered to eliminate the pork, or earmark that eat up municipal, state and
federal budgets. One example is when fire fighters and policemen, through collective
bargaining, are allowed to accumulate unreasonable overtime to enhance the figure
their retirement pay will be based on. In many cases it is more than what their base
pay was before retirement.

This sector of labor doesn't create wealth, it consumes it like a Socialistic state.
Margaret Thatcher said, "The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run
out of other people's money." Those in office now should volunteer for a ten
percent good faith reduction in their compensation. Even if serving one term,
an elected official can receive full retirement pay. This is not right.

Depending in what office they hold and for how long, a reasonable vestment period
should be pro- rated on a 20 year measure to determine compensation.

The thugs infesting the unions, pouring millions into the Democrat party, have
a strangle hold on the government and they don't want to let go

Conservative Commentary by George Giftos

Below is a Breitbart tv - "Uncovered Video of Obama".
Obama Leads SEIU Chant After Vowing to Paint the Nation Purple!

This Video has been taken down numerous times. Why does the Left promote Marxism
and Socialism but don't want us to see the evidence? If liberalism is so great
why are they not proud to stand by it?

Bookmark and Share

Friday, February 25, 2011

Not a Big Al Gore Fan

I read in The Tico Times that the author of “A Convenient Lie” (aka “An Inconvenient Truth”), Al Gore, is coming to Costa Rica to propagandize his fallacious theory of “global warming” (Tico Times, Feb. 18).

Since he began his campaign to scare the world about manmade global warming, he has become a multi-, multi-millionaire by conning many countries into believing that his theories are based on scientific fact.

Most reputable climatologists have said that man is not responsible for any kind of climate change or global warming (by the way, Gore has no scientific background at all).

The consensus is that most changes, if there are any, are a direct result of sunspots, something that man cannot control it in any way whatsoever.

For someone to spend $300 for a ticket to this propaganda event is an exercise in futility and simply a donation to an already rich man.

Look for zero valid information coming from this conference of obfuscation and deceit.

As P.T. Barnum would say, “There’s a sucker born every minute.”

Chuck On The Right Side
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Inhumane Treatment of Elderly Patients on UK Healthcare

We have some results from The Socialized Healthcare system in England. How many times do we have to hear "well EUROPE does this, that or the other, so WE should"? I love England as an Ally. (although Barry Soetoro has spit on the UK and treated them like dirt). However, we are America. We are not Greece, France or Kenya (or are we ruled by a Kenyan? just kidding, wink wink). Also we are not Spain yet, with the Green jobs and 20% unemployment.

If the Slave Owner Regime was so Brilliant, then why didn't they investigate other Countries with obamcare type, government controlled healthcare.

NHS shamed over callous treatment of elderly

The National Health Service is today condemned over its inhumane treatment of elderly patients in an official report that finds hospitals are failing to meet “even the most basic standards of care” for the over-65s.

Portion below written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent

A study of pensioners who suffered appalling treatment at the hands of doctors and nurses says that half were not given enough to eat or drink. One family member said the maltreatment amounted to “euthanasia”.

Some were left unwashed or in soiled clothes, while others were forgotten after being sent home or given the wrong medication.

In several cases considered by the Health Service Ombudsman, patients died without loved ones by their sides because of the “casual indifference” of staff and their “bewildering disregard” for people’s needs.

The damning report warns that extra money will not help the NHS meet required standards of care and that more problems are likely as the population ages.

Ann Abraham, who as health ombudsman carries out independent investigation of complaints against the health service, said: “The findings of my investigations reveal an attitude – both personal and institutional – which fails to recognise the humanity and individuality of the people concerned and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism.

“The reasonable expectation that an older person or their family may have of dignified, pain-free end of life care in clean surroundings in hospital is not being fulfilled. Instead, these accounts present a picture of NHS provision that is failing to meet even the most basic standards of care.

“These often harrowing accounts should cause every member of NHS staff who reads this report to pause and ask themselves if any of their patients could suffer in the same way.

“I know from my caseload that in many cases, the answer must be 'yes’.”

Michelle Mitchell, charity director at Age UK, said: “The inhumane treatment of older people described in this report is sickening and should send shock waves through the NHS and Government.

“It’s difficult to imagine us allowing any other group of people to suffer this indignity and neglect, yet we know this is just the tip of the iceberg. Appalling treatment of older people in the health service is far too common.”

Under Labour, health spending in England tripled to reach more than £100  billion a year. A new “NHS Constitution” set out the service’s commitment to human rights, high-quality care and respect for patients and their families.

Yet the Ombudsman said her office’s investigations into the cases of 10 people over 65, which took place between 2009 and last year, showed the “stark contrast” between the NHS’s stated principles and the treatment patients received.

The patients had all been loving, active people of a generation that “didn’t like to make a fuss”. They had simply wanted to be cared for properly and die peacefully – but they all suffered “unnecessary pain, indignity and distress while in the care of the NHS”. As a result, “they were transformed from alert and able individuals to people who were dehydrated, malnourished or unable to communicate”.

Half of them did not consume adequate food or water, some were not washed, others were discharged in a “shambolic” fashion, while in many cases their suffering was ignored.

Nine of the 10 died while in NHS care or soon afterwards, and the Ombudsman upheld the complaints made about the care received by all 10.

The report says it is “incomprehensible” that the NHS needs to be told that its patients should be provided with clean and comfortable surroundings, assistance with eating, drinking water and the ability to call for help. “Yet the most basic of human needs are too often neglected.”

The “harrowing” cases in the report disclose:

• An 82 year-old died alone because staff did not realise her husband had been waiting to see her for three hours;

• A woman was not washed during 13 weeks in hospital, did not have her wound dressings changed and was denied food and drink;

• A woman was discharged from hospital covered in bruises, soaked in urine and wearing someone else’s clothes;

• The life-support system of a heart attack victim was switched off despite his wife asking to leave it on while she contacted the rest of the family.

The Ombudsman warned that the cases detailed in the report were not exceptional, with almost one in five of the 9,000 complaints it received last year concerning the care of older people.

The report notes that by 2034, 23 per cent of the population will be over 65, with rising levels of dementia placing additional burdens on care. But “extra resource alone will not help” as some staff are guilty of an “ignominious failure to look beyond a patient’s clinical condition”, and an “apparent indifference” to “appalling standards of care”.

The Ombudsman said that “real and urgent change” was needed, including listening to older people and their families, as well as learning from mistakes.

Paul Burstow, the care services minister, said: “This report exposes the urgent need to update our NHS. We need a culture where poor practice is challenged and quality is the watchword. The dignity of frail older people should never be sidelined.”

Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: “Attitudes need to change. Older patients need to be treated with respect and compassion, not as an inconvenience. It is a sick joke that we have an NHS constitution that tells us what rights we have when being treated by the NHS – but it is clear that to the majority of older patients it is not worth the paper it is written on.”

Nigel Edwards, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “It is of course important to put these 10 examples in perspective. The NHS sees over a million people every 36 hours and the overwhelming majority say they receive good care. But I fully appreciate that this will be of little comfort to patients and their families when they have been on the receiving end of poor care.”

Written by Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Why can't Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Read Proficiently?

When the TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States) said "now is not the time to make profits", was that for the Unions too? The TOTUS is in everyone's business yet his budget and ideas are a disaster. It kind of reminds me of someone else, Food Nazi, who tells us what to eat and what not to eat but then she slams down junk food, and huge plates of ribs at every other meal.

We have some evidence below, from the excellent site,, with results on the weasely Unions.

Two-Thirds of Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Can’t Read Proficiently—Despite Highest Per Pupil Spending in Midwest

Written By Terence P. Jeffrey

( - Two-thirds of the eighth graders in Wisconsin public schools cannot read proficiently according to the U.S. Department of Education, despite the fact that Wisconsin spends more per pupil in its public schools than any other state in the Midwest.

In the National Assessment of Educational Progress tests administered by the U.S. Department of Education in 2009—the latest year available—only 32 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned a “proficient” rating while another 2 percent earned an “advanced” rating. The other 66 percent of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders earned ratings below “proficient,” including 44 percent who earned a rating of “basic” and 22 percent who earned a rating of “below basic.”

The test also showed that the reading abilities of Wisconsin public-school eighth graders had not improved at all between 1998 and 2009 despite a significant inflation-adjusted increase in the amount of money Wisconsin public schools spent per pupil each year.

In 1998, according to the U.S. Department of Education, Wisconsin public school eighth graders scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. In 2009, Wisconsin public school eighth graders once again scored an average of 266 out of 500 on the NAEP reading test. Meanwhile, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil expenditures from $4,956 per pupil in 1998 to 10,791 per pupil in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator the $4,956 Wisconsin spent per pupil in 1998 dollars equaled $6,546 in 2008 dollars. That means that from 1998 to 2008, Wisconsin public schools increased their per pupil spending by $4,245 in real terms yet did not add a single point to the reading scores of their eighth graders and still could lift only one-third of their eighth graders to at least a “proficient” level in reading.

The $10,791 that Wisconsin spent per pupil in its public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal year 2008 was more than any other state in the Midwest.

Neighboring Illinois spent $10,353 per student in 2008, Minnesota spent $10,048 per student; Iowa spent $9,520 per student. Among Midwest states, Nebraska was second to Wisconsin in per pupil spending in its public schools, spending $10,565 per student.

Of these nearby states, only Minnesota did slightly better teaching reading to its public school students. In 2009, 39 percent of eighth graders in Minnesota public schools earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score in the state was 270 out of 500.

In Illinois, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average eighth grade reading score was 265 out of 500. In Iowa, only 32 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score was 265 out of 500. In Nebraska, only 35 percent of eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in their public schools, and the average reading score was 267 out of 500.

Nationwide, only 30 percent of public school eighth graders earned a rating of “proficient” or better in reading, and the average reading score on the NAEP test was 262 out of 500.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress explains its student rating system as follows: “Basic denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade. Proficient represents solid academic performance. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Advanced represents superior performance.”

In other words, despite the $10,791 that taxpayers were paying to educate students in Wisconsin public schools, two-thirds of eighth graders in those schools showed at best only a “partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work” at that grade level.

In fiscal 2008, the federal government provided $669.6 million in subsidies to the public schools in Wisconsin.

Written By Terence P. Jeffrey

Bookmark and Share

USA, No Longer a Christian Nation?

In 1952 President Truman established
one day a year as a "National Day of Prayer."

In 1988 President Reagan designated the
First Thursday in May of each year as the National Day of Prayer.

In June 2007 (then) Presidential Candidate Barack Obama
declared that the USA "Was no longer a Christian nation."

This year President Obama canceled the
21st annual National Day of Prayer ceremony
at the WhiteHouse under the ruse
Of "not wanting to offend anyone"


BUT... on September 25, 2009
from 4 AM until 7 PM, a National Day of Prayer
was Held on Capitol Hill,
Beside the White House.
There were over 50,000 Muslims in D.C. that day.



I guess it Doesn't matter
if "Christians"
Are offended by this event -
We obviously
Don't count as "anyone" Anymore.

The direction this country is headed
should strike fear in the heart of every Christian,
especially knowing that the
Muslim religion believes that if Christians cannot be
converted, they should be annihilated.

This is not a Rumor - Go to the website
To confirm this info: islam on capitol hill

Hat Tip to Mr. I
Bookmark and Share

Monday, February 21, 2011

Allen West Rips Koran-Wielding CAIR Lowlife

Allen West Confronted by Koran-Wielding CAIR Executive

At a townhall meeting hosted by Congressman Allen West on Monday evening in Pompano Beach, the Q&A segment of the meeting featured a Koran wielding Nezar Hamze, Executive Director of the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Hamze confronted Congressman West and asked him to point out where in the Koran does it give marching orders to Muslims “to carry out attacks against Americans and innocent people”.

West quickly pointed out that the Koran was written long before America even existed and that it does indeed tell believers to kill infidels, and then proceeded to chronicle a lengthy list of historical Muslim acts of aggression. Congressman West closed his retort by referencing the Fort Hood shootings and 9-11 attacks, saying that his first hand experiences on the battlefield has given him insight into the tactics that Islamists use before telling Hamze not to “try to blow sunshine up my butt” with his criticism of him. West took offense to Hamze’s amateurish criticism of his stance on radical Islam and concluded by telling Mr. Hamze to “put the microphone down and go home.”

The Liberals will stand up for Radical Islam as they rape, kill and Bomb innocent Americans.

Bookmark and Share

Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far

Political Correctness has helped to crumble our society. Some pervert like Wanda Sykes can tell how she wants Rush Limbaugh to die. The Racist Liberals and the so-called President, Obama laughed it up. Yet when a 16 year old white guy says that an odd looking statute “looks Gay”, well Wanda Sykes is there to scold the kid and make fun of his mustache? Double Standard? Liberals have no civility. Liberals have a proclivity for Violence.

Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But Effective! Of course the Media Ignores the truth as the MSM is promoting this slave-owner Regime.

Political Correctness is a movement of speech purification which is meant to remove any objectionable content that unfairly differentiates between the speaker and different subgroups. It is also supposed to change behavior by promoting these subgroups. So the Marxist Liberals us it to attack anyone who speaks out against a Gay Person or so-called Minority. Of course the Marxist Liberals use it to "legally" attack Conservatives.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Rethinking Sharia

Maybe Sharia law won't be so bad if adapted here.

Just think. Its application will solve our traffic problems, because women will not be allowed to drive and gasoline consumption will go down with half the cars off the road.

By eliminating prosecution of spouse abuse, the court case loads will ease, because it will be legal to beat your wife.

Not allowing your little girl to go to school will keep class size an education costs down.

We will have green executions, saving energy because stoning will replace all other methods.

Aids will be eliminated, because gays and dope addicts will be eliminated.

Children will be obedient knowing Daddy can bump them off to save his honor.

And lastly, unemployment figures will drop because all the virgins will be gainfully employed.

Conservative Commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, February 19, 2011

The View of a Young Doctor

A young physician by the name of Dr. Starner Jones wrote a short two-paragraph letter to the White House accurately puts the blame on a "Culture Crisis" instead of a "Health Care Crisis". It's worth a quick read.

Dear Mr. President:

During my shift in the Emergency Room last night, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient whose smile revealed an expensive shiny gold tooth, whose body was adorned with a wide assortment of elaborate and costly tattoos, who wore a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and who chatted on a new cellular telephone equipped with a popular R&B ringtone. While glancing over her patient chart, I happened to notice that her payer status was listed as "Medicaid"! During my examination of her, the patient informed me that she smokes more than one costly pack of cigarettes every day and somehow still has money to buy pretzels and beer.

And, you and our Congress expect me to pay for this woman's health care? I contend that our nation's "health care crisis" is not the result of a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. Rather, it is the result of a "crisis of culture", a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on luxuries and vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. It is a culture based in the irresponsible credo that "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me".

Once you fix this "culture crisis" that rewards irresponsibility and dependency, you'll be amazed at how quickly our nation's health care difficulties will disappear.


Hat Tip to Mr. I

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Pinal County Sheriff’s Office Report

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu's Response to 3 Arizona Mayor's who think Janet incompentano Napolitano is a Genius.

So we must wonder if there is a connection between these Latino mayors, voted into office in border towns, and their desire to stifle border control

Pinal County Sheriff’s Office

Paul Babeu

February 14, 2011

Arturo R. Garino, Mayor of Nogales, AZ
Juan C. Escamilla, Mayor of San Luis, AZ
Dr. Michael Gomez, Mayor of Douglas, AZ

Dear Mayors,
Pinal County is the number one pass through county in the United States for drug and human smuggling. Our pursuits and drug seizures tied to drug and human trafficking far exceed those of the all four border counties. The threat from an unsecured border is real, where 241,000 illegals were apprehended last year by the border patrol and an additional 400,000 got away just in Arizona alone! These are failing grades by anyone's score card.

You speak of improved safety, yet Pinal County has doubled the confiscation of drugs, calls to the Border Patrol and has had 340 vehicle pursuits in 2010 - up from 289 the year before and 140 the year prior. We have a serious public safety threat in my county, due to an unsecured border with Mexico and our nation’s citizens should be highly concerned about the more dangerous national security threat that is presented with other than Mexicans (OTM's) and persons from countries of interest (foreign countries that harbor/sponsor terrorist and actively speak against America and our values).

Year / Pounds of Seized Marijuana / Pursuits / Calls to the US Border Patrol

2007 ------- 28,093 ------- 142 ------- 188
2008 ------- 19,619 ------- 140 ------- 169
2009 ------- 44,963 ------- 289 ------- 270
2010 ------- 44,819 ------- 340 ------- 370

Sadly, these numbers do not reflect other violence or violent crimes related to drug smuggling that has taken place during the past year; including, two officer involved shootings, the execution of a drug cartel member in Casa Grande and the killing of two illegals transporting drugs (killed by bandits or competing Cartel), a man who was kidnapped in Phoenix and because he was unable to meet the ransom demand - was shot twice in the back in the Vekol Valley, as well as another victim who was stabbed in Casa Grande as part of a “Cartel Hit.”

On the human smuggling side of this issue, my deputies have acted with great heroism and risked their own lives to save the lives of illegals who have been abandoned by their “Coyotes.” Pinal County Sheriff’s Deputy Russell Warren jumped into a deep canal to save five Hondurans, while five others could not be saved and drowned. Deputy Warren nearly drowned himself as he fought to save the five survivors and said, “Sheriff, the Coyotes ran away from the cries for help and Deputy Hernandez and I ran to help them.” Deputy Warren’s statement sums up the true measure of the men and women that I’m proud to lead. They have been put in increasingly grave danger due to our unsecured border with Mexico.

Another case includes a six and eleven-year-old who were abandoned by “Coyotes” and forced to drink their own urine for two days in order to survive. I forgot to mention they were abandoned along with their parents, since they were too slow for the main group, so they were simply discarded and left to die in the desert. Where is your outrage and concern for these victims and the many other crimes committed against illegal immigrants?

Just this week, the US Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Pinal County has a minimum of 75-100 mountains/high terrain features that are occupied by “Scouts, or lookouts” for the Mexican Drug Cartels. How have we arrived at this point in America that this has become acceptable to have foreign born criminals controlling the safe passage of drugs and other illegal activities in an entire region of our Arizona?

Feel free to “drink the Kool-Aid” of Janet Napolitano, Dennis Burke and Barak Obama all day long, yet this threat to America remains, until our border is secured. Their agenda is clear – they want “immigration reform” and must convince the public that everything is just fine. The complexities of this problem will not be solved by SB1070, employer sanctions, lawsuits, other future interior enforcement measures, or even thousands of new Border Patrol Agents. We must secure the border. This is achieved by the McCain/Kyl 10 Point Border Security Plan. Only then can we have a reasonable discussion about “immigration reform.” For your review, I have included a copy of the McCain/Kyl 10 Point Border Security Plan. (editor note: half way down this Pdf page)

If your intent was to establish dialogue with me, you would have called, or at least waited for your letter to arrive by mail at my office, prior to releasing it to the media. You have done the very thing they accuse me of doing. I do not represent you, or the citizens of your community, yet I do represent the nearly 400,000 citizens of my county and the viewpoint of the solid majority of Arizonans, who laugh at Secretary Napolitano's suggestion that our border is more secure than ever.

Paul Babeu, Sheriff
Pinal County, Arizona

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Misogynistic and Racist Egypt?

As the majority of sick and deviant MSM stand up for the Muslim Brotherhood, few people will tell the whole story of Lara Logan. We are lucky to have the and Laura Ingraham to tell the truth of the Racist, Lowlife Muslims. These Radical Muslims will get cover from the MSM and the cowards like eric holder and barry soetoro.

Then there is Nir Rosen, NYU Fellow? How about Fellow Lowlife Liberal piece of garbage! US journalist, Nir Rosen, tweeted that Logan was a "major war monger". Nir Rosen is despicable and thrived in the Radical Leftist Academia that touts barry soetoro as Brilliant. These types of so-described elitists are always the misogynists and Racists, just like slick willie and Rev. Wright's protege, Hussein obama.

This is a very informative article. This portion below is by the excellent writer, Andrew G. Bostom.

Lara Logan and Egyptian Muslim Jew-Hatred
Written by Andrew G. Bostom
Last Friday (2/11/11), Lara Logan, chief foreign correspondent for CBS News, was beaten and raped in Cairo during a thirty minute assault by a frenzied throng of over 200 Egyptians. According to a report in today's New York Post, Logan's attackers were shrieking, "Jew! Jew!," while they assaulted her. Moreover, the day before the assault, Logan informed that she and her crew were harassed by Egyptian soldiers who had accused them of "being Israeli spies." The 39 year-old Logan -- who is based in Washington, where she lives with her 2-year-old daughter, and husband -- is not Jewish.

The horrific fate of Ms. Logan -- as a woman in misogynistic Egypt she fared worse, and was raped -- reminded me of a plaintive letter published in the Egyptian newspaper Akhir Sa'a during 1948 by a "light-skinned" Egyptian Muslim man.

It would seem that most people in Egypt are unaware of the fact that among Egyptian Muslims there are some who have white skin. Every time I board a tram I see people pointing at me saying, "Jew, Jew!" I have been beaten more than once because of this. For that reason I humbly beg that my picture (enclosed) be published with an explanation that I am not Jewish and that my name is Adham Mustafa Galeb.

Such virulent Muslim Jew-hatred, inspired by the core, profoundly Antisemitic motifs of Islam's foundational texts -- the Koran hadith, and sira -- dates from at least the 11th century as documented by Jews under living Muslim rule then, in Egypt, and neighboring areas of the Middle East. S.D. Goitein's seminal analyses of this primary source documentary record of letters revealed a unique strain of Islamic Jew hatred was extant at this time (i.e., up to a millennium ago). The Jewish victims of this Muslim hatred created

...a special word for it and, most significantly, one not found in the Bible or in Talmudic literature (nor registered in any Hebrew dictionary), but one much used and obviously coined in the [11th century] period. It is sin'ūth, "hatred," a [Muslim] Jew-baiter being called sōnē, "a hater."

Incidents of such Muslim Jew-hatred documented by Goitein were particularly frequent in Egypt.

All of the following events which wrought tremendous devastation to Egyptian Jewry under Muslim rule, up to a millennium before the advent of the modern bogeymen of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928: the murderous persecutions of al-Hakim during the early 11th century, one of which was timed for Passover in 1012; Jews in Alexandria and Cairo being pogromed and plundered in 1047, 1168, 1265, and 1324; and Sultan Baybars in the 13th century blaming Jews for starting a plague, and subjecting them to extortion, massacre, and expulsion.

Five hundred years later, the great scholar of Arabic E. W. Lane reported after nearly a decade of residence in both Cairo and Luxor (through 1835), on the difference between the attitude of Egyptian Muslims toward Jews and Christians, highlighting the influence of Koran 5:82:

They [the Jews] are held in the utmost contempt and abhorrence by the Muslims in general, and they are said to bear a more inveterate hatred than any other people to the Muslims and the Muslim religion. It is said, in the Koran [quoting 5:82] "Thou shalt surely find the most violent all men to those who have believed to be the Jews..."

Lane further notes,

It is a common saying among the Muslims in this country, "Such one hates me with the hate of the Jews." We cannot wonder, then, that the Jews are detested far more than are the Christians. Not long ago, they used often to be jostled in the streets of Cairo, and sometimes beaten for merely passing on the right hand of a Muslim. At present, they are less oppressed: but still they scarcely ever dare to utter a word of abuse when reviled or beaten unjustly by the meanest Arab or Turk; for many a Jew has been put to death upon a false and malicious accusation of uttering disrespectful words against the Koran or the Prophet. It is common to hear an Arab abuse his jaded ass, and, after applying to him various opprobrious epithets, end by calling the beast a Jew.

Subsequent 19th century accounts validate and expand upon Lane's narrative regarding the pervasive Egyptian Muslim Jew hatred which was endemic well before the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood. For example, the French surgeon A.B. Clot who resided in Egypt from 1825 to1848, and served Muhammad Ali as a medical adviser, earning the honorific title, "Bey", made these confirmatory observations written in 1840, five years after Lane's travelogue first appeared in 1835:

The Israelite race is the one that the Muslims hate the most. They think that the Jews hate Islam more than any other nation...Speaking of a fierce enemy, the Muslims say: "He hates me the way the Jews hate us." During the past century, the Israelites were often put to death because they were accused rightly or wrongly to have something disrespectful about the Koran.

And three decades later, such hateful attitudes directed at the Jews specifically, persisted among Egyptian Muslims, as recorded in 1873 by Moritz Lüttke:

The Muslim hates no other religion as he hates that of the Jews...even now that all forms of political oppression have ceased, at a time when such great tolerance is shown to the Christian population, the Arabs still bear the same contemptuous hatred of the Jews. It is a commonplace occurrence, for example, for two Arabs reviling each other to call each other Ibn Yahudi (or "son of a Jew") as the supreme should be mentioned that in these cases, they pronounce the word Yahudi in a violent and contemptuous tone that would be hard to reproduce.

Jacob Landau's modern analysis of Egyptian Jewry in the 19th century elucidates the predictable outcome of these bigoted archetypes "constantly repeated in various forms" -- the escalation from rhetorical to physical violence against Jews: is interesting to note that even the fallahin, the Egyptian peasantry (almost all of them Muslim) certainly did not know many Jews at close quarters, but nevertheless would revile them. The enmity some Muslims felt for the Jews incited them to violence, persecution, and physical assault, as in 1882...Hostility was not necessarily the result of envy, for many Jews were poverty-stricken and even destitute and were sometimes forced to apply for financial assistance to their co- religionists abroad.

From the 1930s onward, traditional Egyptian Islamic Jew-hatred was complemented by the influx of European Antisemitism, especially Nazi motifs, which resonated with the Muslim masses. During World War II, after the creation of Israel in 1947-48, and following the Suez war of 1956, anti-Jewish pogroms, riots, and finally government expropriations and expulsions caused the final liquidation of the Egyptian Jewish community.

Jihad and traditional Islamic Jew-hatred in Egypt during the contemporary era have of course been re-focused on the neighboring Jewish State of Israel. Consider a fatwa written January 5, 1956 by then Grand Mufti of Egypt, Sheikh Hasan Ma'moun, and signed by the leading members of the Fatwa Committee of Al Azhar University -- Sunni Islam's Vatican -- and the major representatives of all four Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence. The January, 1956 Al Azhar fatwa's language and arguments are indistinguishable from those employed by Hamas (in its Covenant), revealing the same conjoined motivations of jihad, and conspiratorial Islamic Jew hatred:

Muslims cannot conclude peace with those Jews who have usurped the territory of Palestine and attacked its people and their property in any manner which allows the Jews to continue as a state in that sacred Muslim territory.

[as] Jews have taken a part of Palestine and there established their non-Islamic government and have also evacuated from that part most of its Muslim inhabitants... Jihad... to restore the country to its people.. is the duty of all Muslims, not just those who can undertake it. And since all Islamic countries constitute the abode of every Muslim, the Jihad is imperative for both the Muslims inhabiting the territory attacked, and Muslims everywhere else because even though some sections have not been attacked directly, the attack nevertheless took place on a part of the Muslim territory which is a legitimate residence for any Muslim.

Everyone knows that from the early days of Islam to the present day the Jews have been plotting against Islam and Muslims and the Islamic homeland. They do not propose to be content with the attack they made on Palestine and Al Aqsa Mosque, but they plan for the possession of all Islamic territories from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Despite the Sadat era peace agreement -- and in direct violation of its principles -- Egypt's mainstream Islamic institutions, most notably Al-Azhar University itself -- have continued to expound unmitigated, "sacralized" Jew-hatred.

A front page New York Times story published January 10, 2009, included extracts from the Friday sermon (of 1/9/09) at Al Azhar mosque pronounced by Egyptian-government appointed cleric Sheik Eid Abdel Hamid Youssef. Referencing well-established Antisemitic motifs from the Koran (citations provided, below), Sheikh Youssef intoned,

Muslim brothers, God has inflicted the Muslim nation with a people whom God has become angry at [Koran 1:7] and whom he cursed [Koran 5:78] so he made monkeys and pigs [Koran 5:60] out of them. They killed prophets and messengers [Koran 2:61 / 3:112] and sowed corruption on Earth. [Koran 5:33 / 5:64] They are the most evil on Earth. [5:62 /63]

Earlier, on March 22, 2004, Sheikh Atiyyah Saqr, former head of the Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, who previously issued a fatwa (April 15, 2002) declaring Jews "apes and pigs," was asked the following question in an online chat room: "What, according to the Koran, are the Jews' main characteristics and qualities?" Sheikh Saqr answered by highlighting 20 negative, inveterate traits of the Jews as described by the Koran: fabricating (Koran 3:75; 5:64); listening to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and supporting deception (3:78); rebelling against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); hypocrisy (2:44); selfishness (2:87); wishing evil on people (2:105); feeling pain at others' happiness and feeling happiness at others' afflictions (2:120); arrogance and haughtiness (5:18); utilitarianism and opportunism (4:161); rudeness and vulgarity (4:46); murder of innocents, especially prophets (2:61; 3:112); mercilessness and heartlessness (2:74); breaking promises (2:100); rushing to sin and transgress (5:79); cowardice and greed (59:13; 2:96); miserliness (4:53); and distorting divine revelation (2:79). He prefaced this defamatory litany with an upbeat assurance that the perfidious Jews would be vanquished by the Muslim umma:

We would like to note that these are but some of the most famous traits of the Jews as described in the Koran. They have revolted against the divine ordinances, distorted what has been revealed to them and invented new teachings which, they claimed, were much more better [sic] than what has been recorded in the Torah. It was [because of] these traits that they were not warmly received in all the countries where they tried to reside. Instead, they were either driven out, or lived in isolation. It was the Almighty Allah who placed on them His Wrath and [humiliated] them due to their transgression. Almighty Allah told us that He had sent to them those who would pour upon them rain of severe punishment that would last till the Day of Resurrection. All this gives us glad tidings of the coming victory of Muslims over [the Jews], as soon as Muslims cling to strong faith and belief in Allah and adopt modern means of technology.

The continual, monotonous invocation by Al Azhar clerics of such antisemitic motifs from the Koran (and other foundational Muslim texts) is entirely consistent with the published writings and statements of the late Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi-Grand Imam of this pre-eminent Islamic religious institution from1996, till his death in March 2010.

My book The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism includes extensive first time English translations of Tantawi's academic magnum opus, Jews in the Koran and the Traditions. Tantawi wrote these words in his 700 page treatise, rationalizing Muslim Jew hatred:

[The] Koran describes the Jews with their own particular degenerate characteristics, i.e. killing the prophets of Allah [Koran 2:61/ 3:112], [and see Sheikh Saqr's Koranic citations, above] corrupting His words by putting them in the wrong places, consuming the people's wealth frivolously, refusal to distance themselves from the evil they do, and other ugly characteristics caused by their deep-rooted lasciviousness...only a minority of the Jews keep their word...[A]ll Jews are not the same. The good ones become Muslims [Koran 3:113], the bad ones do not.

Tantawi was apparently rewarded for this scholarly effort by being named Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University, a position he held for 14-years. These were the expressed, "carefully researched" views on Jews held by the nearest Muslim equivalent to a Pope -- the head of the most prestigious center of Muslim learning in Sunni Islam, which represents some 85 to 90% of the world's Muslims. And Sheikh Tantawi never mollified such hatemongering beliefs since becoming the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar as his statements on "dialogue" (January 1998) with Jews, the Jews as "enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs" (April 2002), and the legitimacy of homicide bombing of Jews (April 2002) make clear.

Tantawi's statements on dialogue, which were issued shortly after he met with the Israel's Chief Rabbi, Israel Meir Lau, in Cairo, on December 15, 1997, provided him another opportunity to re-affirm his ongoing commitment to the views expressed about Jews in his Ph.D. thesis:

...anyone who avoids meeting with the enemies in order to counter their dubious claims and stick fingers into their eyes, is a coward. My stance stems from Allah's book [the Koran], more than one-third of which deals with the Jews...[I] wrote a dissertation dealing with them [the Jews], all their false claims and their punishment by Allah. I still believe in everything written in that dissertation. [i.e., Jews in the Koran and the Traditions, cited above]

Not surprisingly, according to Pew polling data, at least 95% of Egyptian Muslims currently view Jews "unfavorably."

This is the irrefragable, mainstream Islamic doctrinal and historical context -- uninterrupted for over a millennium -- which explains why those throngs of Muslim men who sexually assaulted Lara Logan shouted, "Jew! Jew!"
Written by Andrew G. Bostom

Bookmark and Share


(I don't care what party you like, this one's funny!!)

A Republican, in a wheelchair, entered a restaurant one afternoon and asked the waitress for a cup of coffee. The Republican looked across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus sitting over there?"

The waitress nodded "yes," so the Republican requested that she give Jesus a cup of coffee, on him.

The next patron to come in was a Libertarian, with a hunched back. He shuffled over to a booth, painfully sat down, and asked the waitress for a cup of hot tea. He also glanced across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus, over there?"

The waitress nodded, so the Libertarian asked her to give Jesus a cup of hot tea, "My treat."

The third patron to come into the restaurant was a Democrat on crutches He hobbled over to a booth, sat down and hollered, "Hey there honey! How's about getting me a cold mug of Miller Light?" He too looked across the restaurant and asked, "Isn't that God's boy over there?

The waitress nodded, so the Democrat directed her to give Jesus a cold beer. "On my bill," he said loudly.

As Jesus got up to leave, he passed by the Republican, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Republican felt the strength come back into his legs, got up, and danced a jig out the door.

Jesus passed by the Libertarian, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Libertarian felt his back straightening up and he raised his hands, praised the Lord, and did a series of back flips out the door.

Then, Jesus walked towards the Democrat, just smiling.

The Democrat jumped up and yelled,

"Don't touch me ... I'm collecting disability."

Hat Tip to George
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Monday, February 14, 2011

WAKE Up America! Liberals Support Illegals, Not You!

My great great grandfather watched as his friends died in the Civil War, my grandfather watched as his friends died in WW II, and my father watched as my friends died in Vietnam .

None of them died for the Mexican Flag.

Everyone died for the U.S. flag.

In Texas , a student raised a Mexican flag on a school flag pole; another student took it down. Guess who was expelled...the kid who took it down.

Kids in high school in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo because they wore T-shirts with the American flag printed on them.

Enough is enough.

The below e-mail message needs to be viewed by every American; and every American needs to stand up for America
We've bent over to appease the America-haters long enough.
I'm taking a stand.

I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died fighting in wars for this country, and for the U.S. flag can't stand up.

And shame on anyone who tries to make this a racist message.
Let me make this perfectly clear!

And, because I make This statement DOES NOT

Mean I'm against immigration!!!
Welcome! To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!

6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants have in the past!!!

7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you. If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,

We've gone so far the other way...
bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the AMERICAN CITIZEN that's being offended!

WAKE UP America!!!
If You agree.... Pass this on.

Hat Tip to B!

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Arab Contributi​on Adds Up To Zero

Sharia is a primitive law; like a polyp hinged on to Islam. A religion that
was spread by violence and has yet to transform as did Christianity, into an
organization guiding its believers toward peace, decency and love for their
fellow man, evolving from the middle ages to right itself after straying
from it origins. The process is on going.

Islam is still stuck into a middle ages mind set and will not move ahead until
it realizes it is 700 years behind the times and must purge the advocacy of
violence, suppression of free thinking, the demeaning of women and its en-
dorsing honor killing of family members who stray from the chauvinistic goons
under the guise of religion.

In the Judeo-Christian dogma life is precious. The clergy in Islam does not
endorse the sanctity of life. The lives of others are there to be sacrificed for
their benefit, power and position. I have yet to hear of any cleric suicide
bombers. Their misguided beliefs are contrary to God.

Throughout Islam it is evident the radicalism can be mostly associated and
attributed to the Arab world, they having contributed nothing for the betterment
of the human condition since inventing the zero.

Conservative Commentary from George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Friday, February 11, 2011

Bolton for President: A ‘Goldwater Conservative’

John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, tells National Review Online that he is seriously considering a 2012 presidential run. “I am a Goldwater conservative,” he says. “I am not a professional politician. I don’t anticipate running a typical kind of campaign, if I do make that decision.”

“I think in the last two years, President Obama has deliberately, consciously downplayed the threats that the United States faces in the world. I don’t think he’s interested in national security,” Bolton continues. “I think it is very important that whoever the Republican nominee turns out to be, they’re able to stand toe-to-toe with the president in the debates in 2012.”

Bolton says that he has been thinking about a 2012 challenge since early 2009, soon after President Obama first took office. “I don’t think he fundamentally believes that it is his job to advance American interests,” he says

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Obamacare and the Waivers

In our case of 26 states against the federal government regarding the healthcare act. Well we know by now, on January 31, Federal Judge Roger Vinson ruled that the Healthcare Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, is unconstitutional. He pointed to the individual mandate (considered to be the ‘linchpin’ or ‘heart and soul’ of the act) as being unconstitutional, noting that it is inseverable (cannot be pulled out, leaving the rest intact), which means the entire act must be scrapped. However we are dealing with the Corrupt Chicago Political machine!

Are waivers from Obamacare constitutional?

Philip Hamburger, a professor at Columbia Law School, argues that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to be giving out waivers to businesses and unions from the provisions of Obamacare. They have already granted 783 waivers from one of the provisions over organizations and the health insurance they must provide.

This is disturbing for many reasons. At the very least, it suggests the impracticability of the health-care law; HHS gave the waivers because it fears the law will cost many Americans their jobs and insurance.

More seriously, it raises questions about whether we live under a government of laws. Congress can pass statutes that apply to some businesses and not others, but once a law has passed — and therefore is binding — how can the executive branch relieve some Americans of their obligation to obey it?

The dangers of inequity are obvious. Will only corporations and unions get waivers, or can individuals also get them? For example, if a family physician feels financial pressure under the health-care law to fire one of his employees, will he get a waiver to avoid adding to unemployment?

Indeed, can even a small corporation get a waiver? Small businesses provide most new jobs, but the answer is obvious: Waivers are mostly, if not entirely, for politically significant businesses and unions that get the special attention of HHS or the White House. The rest of us must obey the laws.

Hamburger then traces the history of the state dispensing waivers from the law going back into the English background and our own constitutional history and finds no power for the legislature to give the executive branch the dispensing power to select whom a given law should apply to.

Even more strikingly, no American constitution, state or federal, allowed dispensation, let alone its delegation. Nor should this be a surprise. The power to dispense with the laws had no place in a constitution that divided the active power of government into executive and legislative powers. The dispensing power was not a power to make laws, nor even a power to repeal laws, but rather a power to relieve individuals of their obligation under a law that remained in effect. It thus was a power exercised not through and under the law, but above it.

Of course, after a violation of a statute, the executive could refrain from prosecuting the offender or even pardon him. Until the legislature changed the law, however, neither the legislature nor the executive could simply tell a favored person that he was not bound by it.

It's an intriguing argument and one I hadn't seen before. There definitely seems to be something fishy about members of the executive branch to have the power to pick and choose whom a given law should apply to. Take the question away from Obamacare and imagine that it was some other law such as the Civil Rights Act and businesses argued that they could not afford to implement the law. Can you imagine the uproar if any presidential administration tried to pick out which organizations would get waivers from the law? Or pick any law that imposes some sort of burden on organizations - collecting payroll taxes, paying the minimum wage, or following environmental regulations?

We don't know yet which organizations applied for waivers and were turned down, but there could be a very interesting case if such an organization then sued on the basis that Hamburger outlines.

Hat Tip to Mr. I
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Mark Levin on Unconstitutional obamacare

Mark Levin reports: Federal Judge Obamacare Unconstitutional And Can Not Be implemented!!

Can a court ruling stop Obama?? Or is this the lawless Chicago Thug that will continue to destroy America. Barry Soetoro is protected by Political Correctness. Most People are so afraid of denouncing the Community Organizer as they will be called a Racist! It is the typical ploy out of the Marxist Playbook.

Bookmark and Share

Why Does Barry Hussein Hate Arizona?

A President attacking his own States? The abuse that Arizona has suffered under this Marxist Regime is ridiculous. Planned Parenthood, Muslim Brotherhood, Illegal ALIENS, The SEIU, New Black Panthers and ACORN receive support from the Regime. How long can this continue?

Portion below by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner.

Obama Administration colluded with ACLU to attack Arizona
A leading Washington, DC public-interest group, that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported on Thursday afternoon that it has received documents from Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice that reveal the DOJ worked hand-in-hand with the American Civil Liberties Union in mounting their respective legal challenges to SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough illegal immigration law, according to Judicial Watch public affairs director Jill Farrell.

In her report -- submitted to the National Association of Chiefs of Police Legislative Committee -- Farrell states that pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed as far back as June 17, 2010, the documents released to Judicial Watch include email exchanges between Justice Department officials and the ACLU's staff.

Included among the documents obtained by Farrell's Judicial Watch colleagues is a July 27, 2010, email exchange between Lucas Guttentag, leader of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and the DOJ’s Edwin Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General:

2:15 pm: Ed

I left a voicemail earlier today about checking in once the district court rules. Would you be available then?

[Redacted statement] And from all of us, thank you again for your argument on behalf of the United States.


2:40 pm: Thanks Lucas. We should definitely check in once we hear. We’ll be huddling here as soon as we can. What is your thinking at this point on if/how you will proceed in various possible scenarios?

It was good to see you, even if only briefly, and to be on the same side for once! [Redacted statement] I have a feeling we might be seeing each other again on this case.


6:14 pm: Thanks Ed. Yes, a real pleasure to be on the same side.

I think we will be strongly inclined to seek an immediate emergency injunction from the 9th Circuit…

Can you share your current thinking with regard to the various scenarios?

Best Lucas

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include email exchanges between ACLU staff and Joshua Wilkenfeld, the Assistant U.S. Attorney who signed the government’s pleadings in the lawsuit, exchanged hearing transcripts and established opportunities to discuss the case. For example, the documents included this July 16, 2010, email from Guttentag to Wilkenfeld:


…Yes, look forward to talking. I’m getting a fuller briefing on yesterday’s hearing later this morning (Calif. time) and then I am tied up for a short while. Would it work for you to talk at about 4.00 or 4.30p Eastern? If it’s okay with you, I’d like to include two colleagues. By the way, we tried to order a transcript yesterday but understand the US Attorney’s office already did. Can we get a copy directly from you when it’s available?

All best,


Assistant U.S. Attorney Wilkenfeld sent the transcript to the ACLU later that day.

"In the aftermath of President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, the White House, the Democrat Party, and the majority of the members of the news media tried to convince Americans that Obama is a moderate or a centrist. Well, if he is a moderate, why is his administration working with an organization that's decidedly far-left?" asks political strategist Mike Baker.

On May 17, 2010, a coalition of “civil rights groups,” including the ACLU, filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona over SB 1070. According to the ACLU’s press release announcing the lawsuit, this coalition included: “…the ACLU, MALDEF, National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.”

On July 6, 2010, the Obama DOJ filed a lawsuit of its own, which has been described by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) as a “cut and paste” version of the ACLU lawsuit, Farrell revealed.

“It is one thing to share the ACLU’s disrespect for the rule of law but it is quite another to collude with the organization on a prosecutorial strategy against the State of Arizona. Frankly, these new documents show it is hard to tell where the ACLU ends and the Justice Department begins,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“The Obama Justice Department is supposed to be an independent, nonpartisan law enforcement agency. Many Americans will be disturbed, though maybe not surprised, to find that Eric Holder’s Justice Department is colluding with one of the most leftist organizations in the nation. We know whose ‘side’ this Justice Department is on when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Fitton stated.

According to Ms. Farrell, Judicial Watch is representing Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of SB 1070, pro bono in the Obama administration’s lawsuit challenging the Arizona law.

Last October, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that about eleven Latin American countries — Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Chile — are permitted to submit Amicus Briefs (friend-of-the-court briefs) in the U.S. Department of Justice’s challenge to Arizona's SB 1070, which Governor Jan Brewer signed into law in one of the nation’s toughest immigration-enforcement measures.

Like the ACLU, the majority of judges sitting on the bench of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals are far-left ideologues who hold the record for most overturned decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Written by Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner

Hat Tip to Mr. I
Bookmark and Share

Monday, February 7, 2011

How can Clinton continue to support Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood?

Oh well, Hillary slaps down Women again. She allowed her Slick Willie blowhard hubby to run wild on young women. How many other women were attacked by Boxcar Willie? The Left gives a pass and Hillary does her best Barry Soetoro impersonation and sits quietly as Radical Muslim Brotherhood Thugs attack. We have a great article below written by M Catharine Evans.

Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below written by M Catharine Evans
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.

From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:

How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.

It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N. The subjugation of women is fine as long as it serves the administration's political ends. Remember President Obama's 2009 Cairo speech where he promised the U.S. would defend Islamic religious teachings:

The US. Government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal."

In the same month the President spoke those words, the State Department set up an office for outreach to the Muslim Communities. Farah Pandith reported directly to Clinton who would "seek a new beginning with Muslims around the world." Did that include the Muslim Brotherhood determined to impose Sharia law around the world? Honor killings and harsh punishments for women emanate from the same law as the hijab. This from Pamela Geller:

Aset Magomadova leaves Calgary court Thursday July 15, 2010, after a judge sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter. Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova's killing of daughter Aminat.

Sharia law in Canada. That's all that this is. Period. Islam is crazy? Crazy like a fox?

Clinton is nothing more than an Obama knock-off in her alliance with Islamic groups. Instead of specifically denouncing the Muslim Brotherhood and any other sect that adheres to laws promoting the maiming and killing of girls, the former Senator is silent. Rather, she should refer her disillusioned supporter, Reverend Amy, to one of the many ‘it takes a village' speeches she has been asked to give over the years. In light of her recent stance on the Egyptian crisis, oppressed women under Islamist regimes definitely do not have an ally in Hillary Clinton.

Read more M.Catharine Evans at

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Obama’s Approval Rating Plummeting!

We see that Barry Soetoro is sinking in the ratings. The sad thing is that he had a boast from that Tuscon deal. What a horrible atrocity that good Americans were killed by a Nazi Left Winger and the Chicago Thugs use that tragedy to start a Barry Soetoro reelection campaign. The Left is just plain sick!

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -17.

The president’s Approval Index ratings have fallen nine points since Monday as the crisis in Egypt unfolds. Most of the decline comes from a fall in the number who Strongly Approve of the president’s performance (30% on Monday, 23% now). However, for the first time since mid-December, the number who Strongly Disapprove has moved back over the 40% mark for five straight days. The Strongly Disapprove total had been above 40% for most of 2010 but fell to the high-30s after the president and Senate Republicans reached a deal to extend the Bush Administration tax cuts.

Overall, 46% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president’s performance. Fifty-three percent (53%) disapprove.

Gallup is showing the same trend. He got the boost, the Obama honeymoon, and then headed into a steep decline. 45/47 now.

But we know the cause. The rating peaked after the Tucson shooting and his speech to the nation it seemed but its been going down ever since. First his horrible, just horrible, State of the Union speech and then his amateurish reaction to the Egypt crisis. The man demanded an immediate transition and Mubarak flipped him the bird. World leaders must look at this man and be amazed at the stupidity of the American public for putting such a neophyte into office.

Thanks to Flopping Aces for information on polls.

Bookmark and Share

Marxist MSM Attacks Rick Scott, Florida Governor

Dear Stephen L. Goldstein:

Just read another sour grapes column by the political vintner of undrinkable wine, Stephen L. Goldstein. Who'd have thought that Goldstein would write a column against a Republican governor, Rick Scott. I'm "shocked" as Peter Lorre would say in that famous scene from the film Casablanca.

Suppose the Democrats were in charge in Tallahassee - would you be writing a similar column - I think not as your partisanship would take over and condone a Democratic redistricting. right Stephen? Redistricting is either good or bad depending if you are in the majority in the legislative and executive branches of government. It's O.K. if Democrats are "guaranteed" election in "gerrymandered" districts (Ex. Alcee Hastings in the 23rd C.D,), but is "evil" if it favors Republicans, right again Stephen?

Here it is only one month into the Scott administration, and already Stephen L. Goldstein has gotten his DEPENDS all wet and soiled. The governor is already classified, by you, as being autocratic, condescending, and unaccountable. Gee, will the words crook, filthy rich and illegitimate be far behind? You threw out the figure that Scott had only 49% of the vote and that somehow translates into his being illegitimate, but Bill Clinton getting 43% of the vote (year 2000) was a voters mandate and absolutely "legitimate". 49% was pretty damn goods in a 3-way race,don't you think Stephen?

I'm sure Stephen, no matter what Rick Scott does, he'll be fodder for your cheap-shot, slime machine all during his term as governor. You are not overly partisan Stephen, but you are exceedingly irrelevant as well.


Chuck On The Right Side
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Left-wing Black Activists Commit Race Attacks

We have a article below from the great WorldNetDaily. I realize this is a longtime ploy of Marxists to simply throw down the Race Card. How many Liberals have encountered a disagreement or fight with a Minority, yet they are not RACISTS? Wrong, the liberals are the Racists and/or they want to help destroy America.

Breitbart to NAACP president: 'Go to hell'

Journalist insists black leaders – not tea partiers – are real 'racists'
By Drew Zahn

© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Andrew Breitbart

Internet journalist Andrew Breitbart unleashed a tirade on talk radio yesterday, blasting the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People for its condemnation of tea partiers as "racist," instead charging the NAACP itself with racism and telling its president where he can "go."

"Let me say something a tad newsworthy to the president of the NAACP: You can go to hell," Breitbart said. "I have tapes, a tape, of racism, and it's an NAACP dinner. You want to play with fire? I have evidence of racism, and it's coming from the

Breitbart made the explosive comments on the air with Scott Hennen, who hosts a morning talk show on WZFG 1100 AM in Fargo, N.D.

His comments came in response to a resolution adopted by the 101st annual convention of the NAACP earlier this week, condemning the "racism" of the tea-party movement and claiming it could return the nation to the pre-civil-rights era.

According to a report from KMBC television in Kansas City, NAACP President Benjamin Jealous told his organization's members tea parties must "expel the bigots and racists in your ranks or take the responsibility for them and their actions."

"We will no longer allow you to hide like cowards and hide behind signs that say 'lynch our president' or anyone else," Jealous said.

Specific charges within the NAACP resolution, reports the Kansas City Star, include allegations that tea-party supporters have engaged in "explicitly racist behavior," have "displayed signs and posters intended to degrade people of color generally and President Barack Obama specifically" and have used racial epithets in verbally abusing members of Congress.

Breitbart, however, contends that the tea-party movement is about the president's policies, not his race, and that many of the charges of racist behavior at tea-party rallies are exaggerated. Breitbart has also offered a $100,000 reward for any tangible proof of the epithets that were reportedly launched at black U.S. representatives during a tea-party rally protesting Congress' health-care reform efforts – a bounty no one has yet been able to claim.

"You are manufacturing this in a summer in which the economy is the No. 1 issue affecting blacks and whites in this country," Breitbart said of the NAACP. "This country can ill-afford the schism of race to be exploited the way you are, based upon the false premise of the tea party being racist. … This is absolutely manufactured for political gain."

When Hennen brought up a Washington Times story linking the NAACP to the New Black Panther Party, whose Minister King Samir Shabazz not only escaped federal prosecution for voter intimidation amid much controversy but also called for the killing of "some crackers" and "some of their babies" to gain black freedom from white oppression, Breitbart continued his criticism of the NAACP convention.

"Where is the resolution to condemn the racism coming from the [Black Panthers] and killing cracker babies?" Breitbart asked. "Why is the mainstream media ignoring that story while playing up the nonexistent story of the n-word being hurled at congressmen?"

Breitbart joins many voices objecting to the NAACP's denouncement of racism within the tea-party movement.

"For the NAACP to accuse the tea parties of racism is insulting to the great patriots who have participated in this movement and sadly shows just how out of touch that group is with the American people," Tea Party Express spokesman Levi Russell told Politico. "Some of the most compelling leaders of this movement are of many different races – men and women such as William and Selena Owens, Lloyd Marcus, Kevin Jackson and others.

"The racism accusation by the likes of the NAACP has been proved false time and again. Earlier this year, Democrats smeared tea-party activists by claiming members of the Black Caucus were spit on and called the n-word as they paraded through a crowd of tea partiers," he told the publication. "Their blatant lie was proved false by overwhelming evidence from multiple video cameras that recorded the event."

In a blog posted the day before interviewing Breitbart, Hennen expressed similar sentiments.

"In spite of a coordinated bias by the mainstream media, patriotic Americans continue to assemble throughout the nation in protest of big-government policies threatening to undermine our basic liberties," Hennen writes.

"Maybe you're one of the thousands of participants who showed up at one of the tea parties this summer. Take a look in the mirror; what do you see? A racist? Or do you see an average, hard-working American, concerned about the future of this republic?" he asked. "I've met enough of you at these events to virtually guarantee that it's the latter."

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Failed Policies of Socialism

Dear Doug Lyons (Senior Editorial Writer for the Sun-Sentinel):

Doug, of course, we all would like to see all of our students get a good education, especially the black students and other minorities, but what seems to be the impediment in achieving that goal?

I, as an observer of the passing scene, say that you seem to be correct about the black males who seem to be the one's who do not seem to be getting the education they should be getting. I see, in many of the businesses I frequent around south Florida, that the black females are achieving what the black males should be achieving, namely, getting and keeping a good job. I see many professional looking black females in all kinds of jobs, but very few black males, and being in a "red state" (as you snidely implied) has nothing to do with it. Most of the urban school districts, around the country, with lousy schools are overwhelmingly run by "blue state" mayors and city governments.

Why do black females outperform black males academically? That's the question you should address Doug, not whether the city or state is "red" or "blue". My educated guess would be that the major factor happens to be the absence of a traditional family ( a mother and father together at home) in the black community. A 70% out-of-wedlock birthrate is not a positive statistic. The glorification of sports in place of academics also contributes to the lack of educational excellence among black males. Many black males seem to carry a chip on their shoulder and they denigrate other black males who want to succeed and get a good education by saying that those conscientious students are "acting white". A real insidious put down. In addition, the type of music, that puts down women and authority figures, are not positive factors that are conducive to getting a good education. Also, the grooming habits of the black males (wearing their pants halfway down their butts and dragging on the floor) do not create a climate for learning or for getting a good education. Sloppiness in dress generally fosters an environment for mediocrity Another aspect of the demise of the black youth (mostly males) has been the habit of the black people to vote almost exclusively for Democrats these past 70 years, and still they have not been lifted up socially, educationally, and economically, as a result of that monolithic voting pattern. Capitalism and free enterprise are the means of lifting up the black youth, not the failed policies of Socialism, which the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus espouse.

The "tough love", as espoused by Bill Cosby, is mostly shunned by the likes of the "Rhyming Reverends", Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who put forth the the "philosophy of victimization", mainly to keep many of their followers on the "plantation". The opportunities are available for everyone, including blacks and minorities, but it's up to the individual to take advantage of those opportunities, like Lt.Col.Allen West, now Congressman Allen West (R), has done in his life. That's the role model young blacks should try to emulate, not the Jackson's and the Sharpton's of their community.


Chuck On The Right Side
Bookmark and Share