Thursday, January 31, 2013

Catholic Organizations Affected by HHS Mandate

Gayle Trotter is a Hero! She often stands up to these Marxists such as Obama with his war on Religion.

Last June in 2012, the Catholic Information Center and Catholic Voices USA cosponsored the panel discussion, "Women for Freedom". Gayle Trotter discusses Catholic organizations affected by HHS mandate and Christ's call to help the poor. Obamacare was designed to attack the catholic Religion as Marxist want to destroy the Freedom of Religion and take away our Right to Bear Arms.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Disgusting Diane Feinstein Wants Your Guns

Why sugarcoat it, this Diane Feinstein is a scumbag! She knows that she will be protected with the best guns known to man but not YOU! Yes the regular Middle Class People can get their Home Invaded by an Obama Voter and the middle class should not be allowed to protect themselves.

We know these lowlifes in the Marxist Democrat party will keep going until they take all of our Guns. Let this dirtbag Feinstein explain how Joe Middle Class will defend himself from a group of 4 Obama Supporters as they attack you. Does she think six bullets will be enough to fight these home invaders, aka Obama Voters?

We must stop these Marxists, The Dictator and Gun Control

A List of the 157 Types of Firearms Vile Diane Feinstein Wants to Ban

Here are the makes and models of the firearms that Feinstein wants to ban:

Rifles: All AK types, including the following: AK, AK47, AK47S, AK–74, AKM, AKS, ARM, MAK90, MISR, NHM90, NHM91, Rock River Arms LAR–47, SA85, SA93, Vector Arms AK–47, VEPR, WASR–10, and WUM, IZHMASH Saiga AK, MAADI AK47 and ARM, Norinco 56S, 56S2, 84S, and 86S, Poly Technologies AK47 and AKS

All AR types, including the following: AR–10, AR–15, Armalite M15 22LR Carbine, Armalite M15–T, Barrett REC7, Beretta AR–70, Bushmaster ACR, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Bushmaster MOE series, Bushmaster XM15, Colt Match Target Rifles, DoubleStar AR rifles, DPMS Tactical Rifles, Heckler & Koch MR556, Olympic Arms, Remington R–15 rifles, Rock River Arms LAR–15, Sig Sauer SIG516 rifles, Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles, Stag Arms AR rifles, Sturm, Ruger & Co. SR556 rifles; Barrett M107A1; Barrett M82A1; Beretta CX4 Storm; Calico Liberty Series; CETME Sporter; Daewoo K–1, K–2, Max 1, Max 2, AR 100, and AR 110C; Fabrique Nationale/FN Herstal FAL, LAR, 22 FNC, 308 Match, L1A1 Sporter, PS90, SCAR, and FS2000; Feather Industries AT–9; Galil Model AR and Model ARM; Hi-Point Carbine; HK–91, HK–93, HK–94, HK–PSG–1 and HK USC; Kel-Tec Sub–2000, SU–16, and RFB; SIG AMT, SIG PE–57, Sig Sauer SG 550, and Sig Sauer SG 551; Springfield Armory SAR–48; Steyr AUG; Sturm, Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rife M–14/20CF

All Thompson rifles, including the following: Thompson M1SB, Thompson T1100D, Thompson T150D, Thompson T1B, Thompson T1B100D, Thompson T1B50D, Thompson T1BSB, Thompson T1–C, Thompson T1D, Thompson T1SB, Thompson T5, Thompson T5100D, Thompson TM1, Thompson TM1C; UMAREX UZI Rifle; UZI Mini Carbine, UZI Model A Carbine, and UZI Model B Carbine; Valmet M62S, M71S, and M78; Vector Arms UZI Type; Weaver Arms Nighthawk; Wilkinson Arms Linda Carbine.

All AR–15 types, including the following: American Spirit AR–15 pistol, Bushmaster Carbon 15 pistol, DoubleStar Corporation AR pistol, DPMS AR–15 pistol, Olympic Arms AR–15 pistol, Rock River Arms LAR 15 pistol; Calico Liberty pistols; DSA SA58 PKP FAL pistol; Encom MP–9 and MP–45; Heckler & Koch model SP-89 pistol; Intratec AB–10, TEC–22 Scorpion, TEC–9, and TEC–DC9; Kel-Tec PLR 16 pistol

The following MAC types: MAC–10, MAC–11; Masterpiece Arms MPA A930 Mini Pistol, MPA460 Pistol, MPA Tactical Pistol, and MPA Mini Tactical Pistol; Military Armament Corp. Ingram M–11, Velocity Arms VMAC; Sig Sauer P556 pistol; Sites Spectre

All Thompson types, including the following: Thompson TA510D, Thompson TA5; All UZI types, including: Micro-UZI.

Shotguns: Franchi LAW–12 and SPAS 12; All IZHMASH Saiga 12 types, including the following: IZHMASH Saiga 12, IZHMASH Saiga 12S, IZHMASH Saiga 12S EXP–01, IZHMASH Saiga 12K, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–030, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–040 Taktika; Streetsweeper; Striker 12.

Belt-fed semiautomatic firearms: All belt-fed semiautomatic firearms, including TNW M2HB.

Hat Tip to Mr. I

Source: Fox News

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 28, 2013

Realistic Expectations

Slowly and painfully, we are learning that realistic expectations of winning the battle against cluelessness, stupidity and greed in the short term, is unrealistic.

The Islamo-Lunatics have been waging their war against sanity, peace & tranquility since the seventh century. And they’ve yet to succeed although, given the recent progress of the Muslim Brotherhood among today’s descendants of their original clueless, stupid and greedy targets, they do seem to be on the right track.

We few, we band of Infidel Conservatives – we will continue to fight the battle against Obama and his nest of vipers, until they are totally crushed - - or we are.

As we noted at the outset of this ‘meandering’, this isn’t going to be a short war. Frankly, I don’t expect to see anything like total victory in my lifetime. There are simply too many bad guys and , ‘They’re everywhere; they’re everywhere!.” And while it is unfortunate, it is true - there appears to be a shortage of intelligence, courage and will to survive, among those who still remain free to control their own destiny.

And so, while acknowledging the sobering thought that victory though inevitable, is not as near as we might hope - we shall continue to plod forward in our battle against the seemingly overwhelming evil forces we face worldwide - and now, right here at home.

I have no intention of submitting to these bastards, regardless of how they present themselves or however they attempt to threaten or intimidate the clueless, the stupid and the greedy (the something-for-nothing crowd).

I am an American. I believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. That means something. Barack Obama, his nest of vipers, the Muslim Brotherhood and the aforementioned bastards – they don’t stand for anything I believe in. They are liars and they are evil to the core. They are doomed to failure. And I, along with many other true, patriotic Americans – are their ‘Doom-ees’. Got that?


Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 27, 2013

MSM Ignores Black On White Hate Crimes

This story premiered on the fantastic RED STATE website

White Reporters’ Beating by Norfolk Black Gang Ignored by Media, but Real Question is, What is Happening to America’s Cities?

The “major” news media still has not seen fit to tell the story of the two white reporters attacked by a black mob in Norfolk, Virginia. Bill O’Reilly is virtually alone among major media in reporting on this, and noting that the Norfolk area “Virginia-Pilot” did not see fit to cover the local story.

Denis Finley said it was merely a “simple assault” and his paper doesn’t cover such, despite the attack taking place on two of their own reporters, who were out of work from injuries for an entire week, which the police classified as “not grave injuries.”

In case you missed the story, two white reporters – Dave Forster and Marjon Rostrami – had been stopped at a red light when their car was attacked by a black teen who threw a rock at the car.

When Forster got out of his stopped car to confront the rock thrower (and presumably stop further damage to his stopped car) the nearby crowd of 100 surrounded him and several started beating him violently.

When the female reporter got out of the car to try to help him she too was attacked. She managed to get a call off to police – after four attempts – and the police came to disperse the crowd.

Several things are noteworthy about this incident. I will address this in the order of what I feel is most significant, and the first, has not been addressed even on the Bill O’Reilly show.

One of the “Die Hard” movies showed what would happen to a white who is on foot in a “bad neighborhood”. Our intrepid hero in that movie was forced to set out on foot in Harlem, a “bad” neighborhood – for whites. It was the major opening scene of the movie.

Did anyone complain that this depiction of what would happen to a white who is on foot in Harlem, provoke any complaints that it was exaggerated? If so I missed it.

It is a sad fact in America today that in many cities you don’t want to be white and on foot in “the bad neighborhoods.”

Is it because you are white and those who will attack you are black? Is it because the people there are poor and they perceive you are rich? Is it a territorial thing, ie. you should have known better than to come into the “wrong neighborhood”?

Is this a joke? Is there anyone in America besides The Virginia Pilot’s Denis Finley who says what happened to the reporter is not a hate crime, and who thinks there’s nothing noteworthy about this, nothing worth their reporting on?

In fact, if this is not noteworthy, if this is not worthy of a news story in the Norfolk newspaper or in any national media (except for The Blaze online and Bill O’Reilly on Fox TV) then it proves my first point.

Of course, there’s nothing unusual about this story because everybody knows if you are white and you get out of your car in an inner city, high crime, black neighborhood, you will do well to escape with your life, and you will very likely be beaten and robbed very shortly.

It is nice to see that the police, after a few weeks of news silence on this story, did finally arrest a 16 year old for this crime – and he is now an accused felon.

And, since the outcry generated from Bill O’Reilly’s Fox news report, the editor has at least attempted to make excuses. Finley wrote that he had (at last) discovered that “race has entered the equation.” You think?

And, the solicitous Finley also wrote that he’d not reported on the story earlier because his two suddenly bashful reporters did not want their names in the news. One wonders if he is usually this solicitous with other crime victims?

My further conclusions from this story, aside from the fact that everybody KNOWS it is dangerous to be white and on foot in an inner city in America, and everybody knows you aren’t supposed to say or write this, follows.

First, and most fundamental, is that it is only marginally LESS safe to be a black stranger, dressed upscale, and appearing to NOT BELONG to that neighborhood, and be on foot in a black neighborhood. Black on black crime, like the Rodney King riots of many years ago, is the under reported news in America’s inner cities.

The biggest victims of black criminals are blacks who live in their inner city territory. Not the rare white who happens to have made the mistake of being on foot, or stopped at a traffic light, in such a “territory.”

Second. Bill O’Reilly makes the point that Denis Finley denies: if this were a story in Norfolk, Virginia (or any other city in America) of a gang of whites attacking a nice, young couple who happened to have been stopped at a traffic light, we’d have been seeing 24/7 news coverage of this on al the network news channels, radio stations and newspapers in America, for the last few weeks.

Far LESS of a racial motivation has been shown in the Trayvon Martin case in Florida, but the intensity of the media coverage has been incredible.

Third. There is an underdone to this story, if you read between the lines, that the white couple were stupid to have driven their car in that neighborhood, deserved what happened to them. And that they were extra stupid to have got out of their car.

This “blame the victim” mentality of course, completely excuses the criminal. Of course it is true – if they hadn’t been in that neighborhood, and just drove off (including RUN THE RED LIGHT, ESCAPE!!!!), they would not have been hurt. But this “blame the victim” thing is pretty awful, in my view.

Fourth. The liberal media operates on a double standard. Of course they are not going to cover a story like this. Liberals HATE stories like this because they think it plays into the hands of conservatives who are all male racists (according to them).

A story like this would seem to justify their bad behavior so it should not be covered at all.

Fifth. There is a paternalistic mentality at work here on the part of the liberal media. They think you should not hold black criminals to the same standards as criminal whites. They will excuse behavior of blacks, which they would never excuse for whites, because they actually think blacks are stupid, inferior.

They are pathetically racist with this mentality.

Sixth. Many who read this may be shocked but, there is actually a mentality among the liberal-left that says the crimes of whites against blacks – starting with the crime of slavery – is the reason that blacks have a lesser standard of living in the United States, and that only reparations paid by whites to compensate for the several generations of “criminal conduct” against them, will balance this equation.

This is not the mentality of socialist “spread the wealth around” which we have seen and heard from Barack Obama and other leftists. This is reparations for “crimes” by whites against blacks.

Of course this is silly.

Why would a black who came here from Jamaica or from Nigeria three years ago, need “reparations” to pay for what happened to a black slave over 100 years ago?

Why would an Asian Indian or a Russian who drives a taxi in New York City since they arrived in America five years ago, be required to “pay” for the supposed crimes of whites over 100 years ago?

Why would the descendants of people whose “gave the last full measure of devotion” on the battlefield to end slavery, as commemorated in Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, be required to pay reparations?

Why would the side that won a victory at Gettysburg for the idea that you do not have to pay for the crimes of your parents nor have a title or other “tradition” bestowed on you based upon the accident of your birth, now be told that they must pay “reparations” for the supposed sins of their great grandparents?

How did we get to this point in America where an attack like this is covered up instead of reported for what it is – an indication that there is a problem with the criminal justice system in America, especially in our cities, and that there are too many underage inner city troublemakers roaming about without jobs, without hope, but with plenty of bitterness and rage?

How did we get to the point in America that in most cities, everybody seems to think a crime like this is not a wake up call for us to take action but a sign that two white people were in the wrong place and at the wrong time?

Seventh. The argument was actually offered on camera by someone from the neighborhood to Bill O’Reilly’s producer, that the attack by a black mob on two whites was to get even for the death of black Trayvon Martin in Florida.

This is ridiculous on several levels. First, two wrongs don’t make a right. Second, the facts of the two cases are totally different and in Florida are in dispute but there is no disputing that the two white reporters did not attack the black gang. Third, and most important: there were loud and repeated demands that the white be arrested during 24/7 news coverage of the Trayvon Martin case. There has been a media blackout of the Norfolk, Virginia incident.

Eighth. Finally irony about the story. The girl is from Iran. If a group of whites had attacked her, would that have generated a media firestorm? Would we have seen an outpouring of “Muslim immigrant attacked by American mob” or “Female Iranian Immigrant assaulted by The Ugly Americans” for 24/7? Would we have seen repeated demands that the criminals who assaulted her should be found and arrested?

What happened to Dave Forster and Marjon Rostrami is wrong. Skin color should not enter into this topic except to note that it was clearly a motivation on the part of their attackers.

It is wrong, and we should be asking the question about American cities which Dr. Edward Banfield wrote about in The Unheavenly City (1970) – liberal solutions add to the decay, boost the frustration and bitterness, skyrocket the crime rate and solve nothing.

Banfield was not any kind of a “movement conservative” but if you accept the premise that sometimes, we ought to look at issues from a “right and wrong” perspective, then he offers a lot of reasons why liberalism in American cities doesn’t ever work, and why conservative ideas (such as the enterprise zones his book helped motivate/inspire) should be tried instead.

If you keep boosting taxes in American cities and driving off business and the middle class you end up with an ever increasing number of gangs roaming about, looking for some hapless person to stop at a red light where they can throw a rock or do worse.

Liberals have had virtual monopoly control of most of America’s cities for several generations and the ugly truth is, their ideas don’t work, but make it worse, to the point it is now very dangerous in the cities they control. It isn’t hard to see why there is so much “flight” to the suburbs from the cities of America.

The question isn’t what happened in Norfolk on May 1 to two white reporters. Nor is it, what motivated a gang of troublemakers, nor even why is it liberal media covers up stories like this?

Rather, the question is, what is happening to America’s cities, and what can we do to reverse the trend that makes it dangerous to stop at a red light in the wrong neighborhood in so many cities in America? *

This concludes my third month (12 weeks) writing here at RED STATE 5x a week (on weekdays) where I have offered 130,171 words in 58 articles, averaging 2,224 words each.


HanoverHenry of RED STATE is Pat Henry on Facebook, and he is on the lookout for new friends there

Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 25, 2013

TED NUGENT Verbally Gives Vile Piers Morgan A Beatdown on Gun Control

Also see Violence in England Progressed Since Their Gun Ban

Gun control nuts in England have succeeded in turning law abiding citizens defending themselves within the confines of their own homes into criminals. This is just what the Democrats and Marxist Obama want to do in America.

Home Invasion and violent crime is on a rise in England and People, law-abiding People, can’t defend themselves without fear of being arrested themselves. Liberalism is a disease and it will kill us all!

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Rand Paul Rips The Disgusting Hillary Clinton on Fox News

We know that Hillary Clinton is a blatant Liar. How can a woman who claims to be for women’s rights, disregard the rights of so many women who were abused by her husband? Isn’t Hillary a feminist who cares about women’s rights?

Hillary Clinton could have been a stand up woman and supported Juanita Broaddrick. However two weeks after the rape occurred, Hillary met Juanita Broaddrick and while squeezing her hand said, "I've heard so much about you. I've been dying to meet you", and she thanked her for all she had done for her husband. If Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, how could any woman allow that and say that she is for women's rights.

It’s no wonder Hillary couldn’t recall the name of just one victim whether molested by Bill or working in Benghazi. There were many victims that Bill Clinton molested, or had relationships with. Now look at the crimes in Benghazi, Libya and Hillary Clinton wants a pass? She is a sick person.

Hillary Clinton came out like a Cowboy, telling the Benghazi Viacom's Family members that she will get the Guy with the Video. She is a sick Liar!

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Allen West said it and I believe it

“. . . the one way we win is to become completely engaged and display a steel-like resolve.”

Lunatic Liberalism is carrying the day now that Obama has been given another four years to complete his ‘transformation’ of America. He announced his intention the first time he ran for the Presidency. He won and it soon became evident that the direction he would take this nation was diametrically opposed to the cause of individual freedom that moved the early American Colonists to rebel against the tyranny of King George III.

Obama’s blueprint for change is contained in the handbook, ‘Rules for Radicals’ by the most radical of radicals, Sol Alinsky. Barack Hussein Obama swallowed that entire revolutionary B.S., hook-line-and-sinker. Alinsky’s step-by-step plan was designed to undermine and destroy the Constitution of the United States, create chaos in the streets, destroy the unity and will of the American people – and have Socialists take over total control of the Government. That was Obama’s dream – to destroy our sovereignty and bring the lunacy of Socialist ideology to America.

His idea of ‘redistribution of wealth’ as idiotic and far-fetched as that is, found great appeal and so, strong support among a certain segment of our population. These are the people who for whatever the reasons, have less in their lives than some others. Obama’s plan of providing them with a whole litany of goodies paid for by ‘someone else’, was a winner. His tactic: Class Warfare, pitting one group – the ‘have nots’ – against the ‘undeserving rich’. It is as simple as that. Greed trumps ‘the hard work ethic’, every time.

There was no groundswell for the great ‘Hope & Change’ envisioned by Obama. He wasn’t responding to a demand for sweeping change. He was a snake-oil salesman appealing to the most base trait in the human character. That is, a greed that is always on the lookout for any kind of benefit that comes out of someone else’s pocket. If that ‘someone else’ is the ‘Government’, that’s okay. The thought of getting something- for-nothing that will be paid for by someone else’s hard-earned tax dollars isn’t of the slightest concern to people of low moral character – many of whom never pay taxes in the first place.

What is so unfortunate, so sad and so disappointing, is the disingenuousness of Obama. He is an inveterate liar and is deliberately deceptive in his dealings with the citizens of this nation. He cannot be taken at his word; that is his most egregious

character fault. As if that weren’t sufficient to strike mortal fear into the hearts of Americans, there is another quirk that is highly troublesome. It is his need to ‘get even’. He is by nature, an extremely vindictive person. These are not traits to be desired in a President and Commander-in-Chief.

But that’s it, Folks. We’re stuck with this multi-flawed deviate and his peculiar amalgam of animosity for the next four years, barring the miracle of divine intervention. The problem is that if such a miracle fails to occur, this maniacal Monarch can destroy our nation beyond salvation – and it won’t take him four years to do it. His coziness with the blood-thirsty Muslim Brotherhood will hasten the destruction of our freedoms, our way of life and all we’ve held dear over the past 137 years since our founding. That is an imminent danger, as is his uncontrolled spending, his political intransigence and his unadulterated hatred of Republicans or anyone else who is not in total, lockstep agreement with his lunatic ideology. Obama is an extremely toxic ideologue.

He is a dyed-in-the-wool tyrant right out of the mold of Genghis Kahn, Stalin, Idi Amin and the entire list of the world’s most vicious, violence-prone dictators. He is as smooth and as facile as any tyrant on that list. And, he has chosen to interpret his victory in the recent election as having received a clear mandate ‘from the people’. He has chosen to believe that he has received a green light to ratchet up his rape, plunder and pillage of the Constitution of the United States of America.

It is his plan to move on to his heart’s desire, the leadership of the United Nations. He looks forward to exerting his influence over the affairs of the entire world. But before that dream comes true, it is his intention to hand over total control of our Government to the peace-loving Imams of the Muslim Brotherhood. Again, if this sounds far-fetched to you, did you ever dream the nightmare that he’d be re-elected – to a second term? Will someone – anyone, please step forward and show me that he plans something other than this?

Let me remind you again, of Allen West’s admonition: “ . . . the one way we win is to become completely engaged and display a steel-like resolve.

If we, each one of us, will heed this sound advice, take it to heart and ‘do something’ – we can stop the madness and get our country back on track. If we do not accept the challenge, we are in for 4 more years of Obamacare on steroids – and that ain’t good.


You will feel better if you read more MORT’s meanderings HERE

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Left-wing Terrorists and Murderers

Ecoterrorism: Extremism in the Animal Rights and Environmentalist Movements

During the past two decades, radical environmental and animal rights groups have claimed responsibility for hundreds of crimes and acts of terrorism, including arson, bombings, vandalism and harassment, causing more than $100 million in damage. While some activists have been captured, ecoterror cells - small and loosely affiliated - are extremely difficult to identify and most attacks remain unsolved. Although it has been overshadowed by Islamic terrorist threats since September 11, ecoterrorism remains one of the country's most active terrorist movements.

In recent years, an increasing amount of terrorist activity in the United States has been carried out in the name of animal and environmental protection. Automobile dealerships, housing developments, forestry companies, corporate and university-based medical research laboratories, restaurants, fur farms and other industries are targeted across the country. Although no one has yet been injured in a domestic ecoterror attack, the increasingly violent nature of attacks suggests that someone will be hurt before long.

Example: $50 Million Arson in San Diego, 2003

Since the 1970s, hundreds of groups in the United States have advocated for stricter legal protection for animals and the environment. Change has been incremental. Some activists on the fringes of these causes, frustrated by the pace of legislation, have become violent, creating an underground terrorist movement to combat companies and practices they consider abusive and immoral. During the past two decades, extreme animal rights and environmental activists, or ecoterrorists, have committed hundreds of arsons, bombings and acts of vandalism and harassment, causing more than $100 million in damage.

In recent years, fast-food restaurants have been firebombed and car dealerships and housing developments burned to the ground in the name of "ecology" and "animal rights." Increasingly, people that work for companies perceived as harming animals or destroying the environment are targeted as well.

Influenced to varying degrees by their English predecessors and by segments of the anarchist movement, ecoterrorists operate through autonomous cells, are unconstrained by geographic boundaries and are very difficult to infiltrate and stop. Unlike racial hate groups with established hierarchies and membership requirements, for example, an activist can become a member of the ecoterror movement simply by carrying out an illegal action on its behalf.

While post-September 11 discussions of terrorism tend to focus on Islamic threats, ecoterrorist attacks continue to occur around the country and pose significant problems for law enforcement officials. It is unlikely that this movement will disappear any time soon.


There are so many Left Wing Terrorists that the lowlifes in the MSM try and hide it or lie and move them to being Conservatives

Joe Stack (IRS plane crasher) sums up his “manifesto” with this, a popular Karl Marx quote and a stab at Capitalism...

"The woman accused of killing three colleagues at the University of Alabama in Huntsville [Amy Bishop] was a suspect in a 1993 attempted mail bombing, according to a report by The Boston Globe.

The report broke the day after it was learned that Bishop fatally shot her brother in Braintree in 1986. ..." Yes many Left Wing Democrats, Liberals are known for vicious shootings.

"A family source said Bishop, a mother of four children - the youngest a third-grade boy - was a far-left political extremist who was "obsessed" with President Obama to the point of being off-putting."--Boston Herald, February 15, 2010

Unabomber essay urges attacks on 'techno-industrial system'
July 27, 2002 | By Dan Eggen, Dominic Gates, Washington Post

The Unabomber was a big fan of that liar Al Gore. How disgusting is he, selling the TV station to more Radicals?

In an article published this spring by Green Anarchy, a radical environmental newsletter, [unabomber Ted] Kaczynski calls on revolutionaries to "eliminate the entire techno-industrial system" by "hitting where it hurts" and disparages the activities of most radicals as "pointless."

There are many, many more examples of violent Liberals that we will list at another date.


Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 21, 2013

Barry Obama Could Not Pass a Background Check

This information is from a post at the Canada Free Press.

The entire post can be read at

President Barack Obama could not pass a background check if he was applying for a gun permit or a job. Why has this man been allowed to remain in office or take the oath for a second time?

During the 2008 campaign, it was known that:

His official, long form birth records were SEALED.
His Occidental College records were SEALED.
His Columbia College records were SEALED.
His Harvard College records were SEALED.
His College thesis – SEALED.
His Harvard Law Review articles – SEALED.
His Indonesian adoption records – SEALED.
His passport file – SEALED.
His medical records – Unavailable
His baptism records – Unavailable
His papers from his service in the Illinois legislature – Unavailable
His Illinois State Bar Association records - Unavailable
The birth certificate that the White House released is reputed by document experts to be false.

The Social Security number he has used was issued to someone else. He could not pass an E-Verify test. The first three numbers of his Social Security ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049. The number was issued between 1977 and 1979. Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins in Oahu, Hawaii.

Many of the “facts” he cited in his two memoirs have turned out to be questionable, if not outright lies; particularly as regards his birth father, a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth.

A job applicant with Obama’s paper trail would not even pass the smell test, but this man was elected and reelected. The role of journalism is to vet the credentials of anyone running for public office, let alone the highest office in the land. Instead, he has been protected against all inquiries and those making them have been called “birthers” or simply ignored.

In August 2009 he said, “I have not said I was a single-payer supporter”, but in June 2003, as an Illinois state senator, he said, “I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care system.”

In March 2006, he said “Leadership means the buck stops here…I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.” He is now into his second political battle to raise the debt limit. In July 2011, he said “It is not acceptable for us not to raise the debt ceiling and to allow the U.S. government to default.”

In response to a 1996 questionnaire he said “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages, but in November 2008 he said, “I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage.”

He spent his first term blaming the nation’s economic ills on his predecessor, George W. Bush, saying in July 2008, that “he added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion in debt that we are going to have to pay back. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.” Today, the debt stands at more than $16 trillion because Obama added more to the debt than all previous presidents combined. For the first time in U.S. history, our credit rating was reduced and rating services are warning they will reduce it again.

He has a record of using executive orders to bypass the constitutional powers and duties of Congress. His most recent effort was 23 such orders regarding gun control at the same time Americans are buying guns as fast as they can, fearing the loss of the right to own and bear arms. This is the same President who just signed a law granting him and his family lifetime Secret Service protection.

He used “executive privilege” to cover-up the “Fast and Furious” scandal in which guns were allowed to be purchased and transported for use by Mexican drug cartel members.

He lied about the attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed a U.S. ambassador and encouraged members of his staff to spread the lie that it was “spontaneous” and the result of a video no one has seen.

He and the Democratic Party imposed “Obamacare” on the nation and its passage is already undermining the provision of healthcare services, driving up the cost of health insurance, and causing physicians and the providers of testing and other services to leave the profession and close their doors.

He no longer can blame President Bush, so now he blames the Republican Party that has offered solutions to the nation’s economic crisis that has worsened every day he has been in office. His foreign policy has consisted of apologizing for America and standing aside while one nation after another in the Middle East and northern Africa has fallen under the control of Islamist radicals. He is doing nothing to avoid the sequestration cuts that would harm national defense and a range of other government functions.

It has taken four years for a case challenging his right to hold office and the Supreme Court has scheduled a “conference” in February that might decide to ignore a current case.

The mainstream media has failed us and we only hope the courts will not fail us.

He should not be administered the oath of office for a second time.

© Alan Caruba, 2013

Alan has a daily blog called Warning Signs.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Marxist Danny Glover Spreads Lies to Students at a Texas A&M University

We see one of the Hollywood Marxists is going around spreading more false information. Danny Glover is the typical Limousine Liberal who hangs around Dictators and Slave Owners. No, not just Obama, this lowlife Danny Glover hangs around Dictators from Third World Countries.

A meme is going around by a number of people claiming that the Second Amendment — “the right to bear arms” — was put in the Constitution to protect slavery. The following is from actor Danny Glover who spoke to a group of students at a Texas A&M University: “‘I don’t know if you know the genesis of the right to bear arms,’ he said. ‘The Second Amendment comes from the right to protect themselves from slave revolts, and from uprisings by Native Americans.

“‘A revolt from people who were stolen from their land or revolt from people whose land was stolen from, that’s what the genesis of the second amendment is,’ he continued.

If this is true, then it’s obvious that gun ownership was for protection against what people believed was a threat. If there were fears of Indian uprisings and slave revolts, then you would think that Glover would be lobbying for the right of the people to keep and bear arms rather than for the government to restrict gun ownership. Blacks are as much victims of crimes as are whites. Why should they be left defenseless? It doesn’t matter what the perceived threat is.

That threat today consists of marauding thugs and a potentially power-grabbing and rights-denying federal government that one day might use unrestricted force to impose its agenda on the American people.

Unfortunately for Glover and other mythstorians, the history of the Second Amendment is not rooted in the slave trade. It’s rooted in the threat of political tyranny going back centuries.

“The right to have arms in English history is believed to have been regarded as a long-established natural right in English law, auxiliary to the natural and legally defensible rights to life.”

The 1689 English Bill of Rights included a provision that there would be “no royal interference in the freedom of the people to have arms for their own defence.” Under James II, Protestants were denied the right to bear arms. The 1689 Bill of Rights stated: “Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence.”

Debates and laws over bearing arms have a long history in England for some of the same reasons we are debating the topic today. The great English jurist William Blackstone (1723–1780) wrote:

“In these several articles consist the rights, or, as they are frequently termed, the liberties of Englishmen. . . To preserve these from violation, it is necessary that the constitution of parliaments be supported in it’s full vigor; and limits certainly known, be set to the royal prerogative. And, lastly, to vindicate these rights, when actually violated or attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and parliament for redress of grievances; and lastly to the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defence. And all these rights and liberties it is our birthright to enjoy entire; unless where the laws of our country have laid them under necessary restraints. Restraints in themselves so gentle and moderate, as will appear upon farther enquiry, that no man of sense or probity would wish to see them slackened.”

You can see echoes of our own Constitution in these words. For example, in addition to the right to bear arms, the First Amendment uses the phrase “redress of grievances.” These were viewed as “liberties of Englishmen” that were their “birthright to enjoy.”

Notice that nothing is said about slavery.

Also see Stephen P. Halbrook’s The Founders and the Second Amendment: The Origins of the Right to Bear Arms that’s “the first book-length account of the origins of the Second Amendment, based on the Founders’ own statements as found in newspapers” from 1768 to 1826.

It didn’t take me long to find these facts. They are available to anyone who wants to take the time to do the research. Glover knows that he’s appealing to low-information voters.

Read more:

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Elites Protect Themselves with Guns but not American Citizens

What do American presidents and vice-presidents, their wives and children, foreign heads of state, many governors, big city mayors, large company CEOs, prominent directors, actors, singers, and other entertainers, and the children of many wealthy people in Washington, DC, and other wealthy "elites" have in common? They carry guns or have armed guards to keep them from becoming victims of criminals, even when they are in countries, states and cities with some of the most restrictive gun laws in the world.

Almost all these elites who are also Democrats have something else in common; they don't want you to have a gun with which to defend yourself, your family, or other law abiding Americans.

How many of these protected elites are actually murdered annually in the U.S.? Usually none, or nearly none. And, actual attempts to kill them are rare. It is almost exclusively the rest of us, not the elites, who are the victims of violent crime. We are the ones who need guns to protect ourselves and our families. I don't want harm to come to the elite (or anyone else), and I don't begrudge their armed protection. But, the lives of my family members are just as important to me, as are the lives of your family members to you, as are the lives of any of the elites or their family members. We have just as much right to protect ourselves and our families as do the elites.

The political elites write our laws and are supposed to enforce laws to protect American citizens. They are not fulfilling these responsibilities. Did you know that the number of gun prosecutions by President Obama is down 45 percent? Did you know that illegal aliens, people who shouldn't even be here, commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime? Did you know that the elites in charge of America's major cities (almost exclusively Democrats) preside over cities with much higher rates of gun violence than the national average, often despite their very restrictive gun laws?

Why don't the elites enforce current gun laws and put violent criminals in prison permanently? Why does revolving door "justice" prematurely return violent criminals to the streets? Why aren't violent juvenile criminals treated severely? Why don't the police round up the gangs known for much of our violence and confiscate their illegal guns?

Not only are the violent criminals not stopped by the elites, criminals are encouraged by restrictive gun laws that prevent law abiding citizens from being able to defend themselves.

If someone from outer space landed here, he or she or it would think that those in charge want lots of people killed by criminals. Perhaps they would think Americans are playing some sort of a game where armed criminals have the right to hunt disarmed people (hasn't Hollywood made movies like this, e.g., The Most Dangerous Game?). But, after hearing politicians talk about taking guns from law-abiding people while doing little to stop armed criminals, the spacemen might conclude that innocent people are intentionally being sacrificed, to create a crisis which politicians can use to justify political objectives.

The fact is that the elites are not protecting American citizens. Is it because they can't or they won't? If they can't protect us, and it appears they can't prevent criminals from getting guns, then they have no right to take away the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves and their families. History shows taking away guns just makes more victims.

If the elites won't protect us, for whatever reason, and they still want to take away our ability to protect ourselves, then the spacemen's suspicions are probably correct, the politicians are allowing gun violence and sacrificing people, like the children in Newtown, to promote the political elite's goal of controlling the American people.

Leaders lead by example, so here is how I see it. Our elites, i.e., the president, vice-president, senators and congressmen, governors, mayors, CEOs, actors, entertainers, and other rich people, should give up armed protection for themselves, their spouses and their children before the rest of us are asked to give up our Constitutional rights. Until the elites give up their armed protection, politicians and the power of government should focus on taking away the freedoms of people who commit crimes, not the people who don't.

Don Ewing

Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 18, 2013

NRA Ad Shows that Obama Is an Elitist Hypocrite

The idiots and lowlifes at CBS, ABC, NBC and other Marxist Media Outlets are trying to hide from their Nazi roots and point the finger at the NRA?

The MSM (main stream media) are cowards and bigots. The Left Wing Obama supporting Media are the real Nazis. These MSM cowards are after YOUR guns and will do any and all Marxist tactics to get them. The Left Wing Leader, King B. Hussein Obama, is the number one Marxist and he will not stop until we are all slaves.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Vile CNN is Censoring Pro-Gun Views

The liberal media's relentless assault on conservative values and our constitutional rights has reached fever pitch.

CNN, the self-avowed neutral news outlet, is leading the liberal media's anti-Second Amendment crusade and censoring conservative opposition to radical gun control measures.

On the one-month anniversary of the horrific Newtown shooting, CNN invited THIRTEEN anti-gun rights advocates and only TWO pro-gun rights guests on to discuss the issue.  

This hard evidence confirms CNN's undeniable anti-gun bias and they must be held accountable for their partisan agenda.

Please take a moment to contact the office of Janelle Rodriguez, CNN's Vice-President of Programming by phone at (404) 827-5681 or by email at, and tell her to stop censoring the views of pro-gun rights Americans.  

As President Obama was finalizing his liberal anti-gun agenda, his fanatically loyal propagandists in the national "news" media have been working overtime to demand the American public accept anything he proposes - no matter how extreme or impractical - while censoring the truth about the Left's radical anti-gun agenda.  

CNN is leading the charge in this campaign and we must hold them accountable.

Let Janelle Rodriguez know that you won't stand for CNN's blatant anti-gun lobbying. 

Thank you for standing up to the left-wing bullies in the "news" media and please forward this email to your friends and family and ask them to contact Janelle Rodriguez to demand objective reporting. 

P.S.  After you contact Janelle Rodriguez, please chip in a tax-deductible contribution so MRC can continue to battle the so-called "news" media's attempts to censor the news.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Allen West Takes New Media Job With PJ Media

On The Record ~ Allen West announces he will be joining PJ Media

Allen West has announced that he is taking a new media job with PJ Media. PJ Media is an excellent website and media outlet helping combat Left Wing Marxists. Allen West had his announcement on Greta Van Susteren’s Fox News show.

Allen made the announcement during his interview with Greta Van Susteren. Michelle Fields and radio host John Phillips will join him in this new venture.

Once upon a time – 2005 to be specific – Academy Award Nominee Roger L. Simon got together with Charles Johnson (the blogger behind Little Green Footballs) and Glenn Reynolds (the blogger behind Instapundit) to create a new blog that would shed light on issues important to Americans through insightful reporting, commentary and analysis. The mainstream media tried to dismiss them as disgruntled people blogging in their pajamas. They rejected the evaluation but adopted the name, and PJ Media was born.

At last count, 1.4 million unique visitors go to each month and consume 20 million page views of our content. And those big numbers keep getting bigger. We want to count you in that number too.

There’s one more big idea we want to share with you.

Beyond covering and commenting on the news, PJ Media is on a mission. We call it voices from a free America.

PJ Media voices work to …

• keep speech free in our society and media,
• ensure free thinking in our schools and media,
• encourage a free and prosperous economy,
• rid our children of massive government debt and an overreaching government,
• and defend, protect and preserve what made, and will continue to make, America great.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 14, 2013

Democrats Say Kill Gun Owners and Behead Wealthy

What does a peace loving and peace abdicating columnist resort to when he gets really angry? Yes the Liberals have a proclivity for Violence. Liberals love to talk about raping, beating and killing anyone who is a regular Joe.

Peace Loving Columnist Says Kill Gun Owners if Necessary and Drag Legislators Behind Pickup Trucks

Donald Kaul has been a columnist for nearly 50 years and was even nominated for a Pulitzer Prize for his journalist prowess. He is known for his left-winged liberal views and has written against many conservative ideas like gun ownership and constitutional things like that.

Last summer, Kaul suffered a heart attack and retired from his weekly posting at However, the events following the Sandy Hook massacre have brought Kaul’s pen out of retirement long enough to write an opinion for the Des Moines Register. Known as an anti-gun peace loving sort of chap, Kaul spoke out about the violence and the gun control dialog that followed.

He wrote in part:

“Here, then, is my “madder-than-hell-and-I’m-not-going-to-take-it-anymore” program for ending gun violence in America:

• Repeal the Second Amendment, the part about guns anyway. It’s badly written, confusing and more trouble than it’s worth. It offers an absolute right to gun ownership, but it puts it in the context of the need for a “well-regulated militia.” We don’t make our militia bring their own guns to battles. And surely the Founders couldn’t have envisioned weapons like those used in the Newtown shooting when they guaranteed gun rights. Owning a gun should be a privilege, not a right.

• Declare the NRA a terrorist organization and make membership illegal. Hey! We did it to the Communist Party, and the NRA has led to the deaths of more of us than American Commies ever did. (I would also raze the organization’s headquarters, clear the rubble and salt the earth, but that’s optional.) Make ownership of unlicensed assault rifles a felony. If some people refused to give up their guns, that “prying the guns from their cold, dead hands” thing works for me.

• Then I would tie Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, our esteemed Republican leaders, to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag them around a parking lot until they saw the light on gun control.”

I love how so many anti-gun people turn to guns when it fits them and to violence as bad if not worse than what they claim to abhor. Obama is anti-gun, but is protected by guns everywhere he goes. His kids attend a school with at least 11 armed guards. The Journal News in New York is so anti-gun that they post an interactive map of all pistol permit owners in 2 New York counties, but when they feel threatened, they immediately hire armed security guards.

Read more:

Ad you see the Left wing, Democrats, Progressives always resort back to their KKK days and promote hanging and dragging behind trucks. Why on earth do so many Black People and Jews support Democrats. If obama and democrats had their way, most Americans would be back in chains. Remember Obama's Muslim family SOLD SLAVES. Barry Soetoro Obama has the radical Muslin roots and that is dangerous to America.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Open Letter to New York State Elected Officials Regarding Guns

New York already has some of the most restrictive gun laws and handgun licensing in the nation. The problem is that criminals don't follow the law. When I make a gun purchase, it's a 45 minute transaction as soon as I hand over my ID and start filling out paperwork until the sale is actually made at the register. A criminal merely goes to another state or buys an illegal gun on the streets of NYC, D.C., or Baltimore. Your restrictions may hamper me but they do nothing to impede a criminal.

I live in an area where a 911 call results in a 30-45 minute response time. In a matter of seconds, an armed response may be the difference between the arriving police officers taking statements or cordoning off a crime scene. I would prefer to be able to give verbal statements to a responder rather than leave evidence for crime scene investigators because I couldn't defend myself or my family.

I purchased my guns legally using the current system that's in place in NYS. The fact that gun owners exercise their 2nd Amendment rights does NOT make them "extremists". I am insulted by the Governor's labeling of people who believe in exercising their right to bear arms.

Perhaps the Governor and Mayor Bloomberg will give up their well-armed security detail and lead by example for all New York citizens? Perhaps Sen. Schumer will give up his carry permit and handgun for the same reason? I don't think so.

I was born and raised in New York State and have lived here all my life except for the time I spent in Marine Corps service. If New York State insists on trampling my 2nd Amendment rights further, it will be an impetus for me to move my family and my business to another state. I refuse to give up my rights for a false sense of security.

Hat Tip to Max Tollens Jr

Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 11, 2013

Fat Albert and Global Harming

The once handsome but now, grotesquely obese+ugly Al Gore has added yet another iconic ‘charm’’ to his charm bracelet of stupid actions. Actions that have been toxic to humans and harmful to the globe at large. He has sold his soul once again, this time – to Al Jazeera, that paragon publisher of truth, virtue & utter Islamic bullshit.

It seems that Fat Albert Bore (Gore) is currently rollicking in self-gratification at his most recent reincarnation. Who knows what he thinks he is doing this time or who he thinks he is?

He has just sold his share of a failing media mess to Al Jazeera, touting the total compatibility of both their philosophies. Now, isn’t that just too sweet for words?

No need to recount here, all the ways this non-entity has covered himself with a combination of nincompoop and rubber cement. Terribly smelly and quite sticky, I must say. But, for several decades, we’ve all been witness to the many public displays of his prowess as a Kabuki dancer, whose colorful flourishes are painfully symbolic evidence of his wide variety of psychological disorders.

While most of his antics were transparently stupid and likely to merely affect our health and sanity in a bad way, this ‘antic’ is overtly traitorous. It is diabolically calculated to open the door wide to a violently hostile, anti-American purveyor of Islamist-oriented disinformation. And in the process, to provide a national stage for more encroachment and more toxic pollution of our universal information sources. The obvious intent is to do real harm to our national security. Thanks a lot Al, old boy.

This time, ALGORE has crossed the line from being stupidly insipid to being an actual, treasonous tool for use by a sworn enemy of the United States of America. Even though he has sold his interest in this newly enhanced loud-speaker for evil, he says that he will sit on the Board of Al Jazeera. Might we presume that he is remaining available to add to his litany of prostitutions, while still retaining the honor and mantle of a former Vice President of the United States? How cute.

He must be held accountable and made to feel the consequences of his traitorous action. Whatever it takes.


More MORT’s meanderings HERE

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 10, 2013

TED NUGENT's Open letter to Joe Biden on Guns

‘Gun control’ won’t save lives


Congratulations on your appointment to lead a presidential commission to end gun-related violence.

As a National Rifle Association board member, husband, father, grandfather, law enforcement officer and genuinely concerned American, I too want nothing more than to see evil, senseless massacres stopped. I concur with the president and caring people everywhere: It’s time to end these slaughters.

As you gather your team to study massacres and how to stop them, I offer to you my services and a lifetime of expertise on guns in all their implementations. While I strongly differ with President Obama on many issues, I agree with him that we must work with all we can possibly muster to end these tragedies.

As you begin to formulate your thoughts on how to proceed with your task, I hope your starting point is to provide the president with the facts regarding these slaughters and to offer him common-sense recommendations that are void of a political agenda and will actually make a meaningful difference. If the American people smell a political agenda here, that will only bog down our efforts.

In the spirit of goodwill and a deep desire to end gut-wrenching, incredibly sad and senseless rampages, I offer you the following recommendations:

I encourage you to persuade the president to lead this effort by providing a number of public service announcements. The announcements should include watching out for each other, encouraging parents to be more involved in their children’s lives regarding entertainment choices, and knowing various indicators we should watch for in people who are unstable.

Clearly, the focus on solving these mass murders must be on the mentally ill. In almost every instance of mass killing, there were ample red flags and warning alarms that either were avoided or were not acted upon by mental health professionals, family members, friends and acquaintances. While I deeply respect an individual’s privacy and civil liberties, the American people need basic awareness of what indicators to look for regarding potentially violent, psychotic people. Our collective safety begins with being collectively vigilant.

You will find in your assessment that all of the massacres have occurred in gun-free zones. What gun-free zones create is an environment where good people are unarmed and virtually defenseless against an unstable person intent on committing mass murder. Gun-free zones are modern killing fields. I implore you to recommend that Congress pass a law to ban gun-free zones immediately.

Just like your full-time, armed security detail, qualified citizens with authorized, legal concealed-carry permits should be able to carry weapons virtually everywhere to protect themselves, their loved ones and innocents.

I also implore you to strongly consider recommending that trained school officials have access to weapons to protect students. Just as airline pilots may have access to a weapon to prevent another Sept. 11 mass murder, school officials also should be trained to stop shooting sprees at our schools.

I don’t encourage you to recommend a ban on any weapon, magazine capacity or type of ammunition. That won’t accomplish anything other than prevent the 99.9 percent of responsible, law-abiding Americans from enjoying these modern weapons as we do now. We should never recommend or develop public policy that restricts the rights of the good guys based upon what evil people do or might do. If that were the case, alcohol still would be banned. As you may know, drunk drivers kill an estimated 12,000 Americans each year and hurt tens of thousands more.

I encourage you also to keep this misnamed “gun violence” in perspective. While all deaths are tragic, the vast majority of gun-related murders and violence are committed by gang members who do not use guns that look like — but do not perform like — military assault weapons. The majority of crimes that involve a firearm are committed with handguns. I concurred with you back in 2008 when you stated, “If [Mr. Obama] tries to fool with my Beretta, he’s got a problem.” I trust you still maintain those sentiments.

Again, I offer you my services and a lifetime of expertise. I look forward to hearing from you.


Ted Nugent

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

More Guns Equal Less Homicides

Gun Myths are that More Guns = More Homicides

Gun Myth: You can buy automatic weapons at any gun shop

This is completely and utterly false. Automatic weapons are highly regulated, extremely expensive ($15,000+) and VERY difficult to acquire. They're also extremely rare and have NEVER been used in any school shooting in America.

Just to acquire an "automatic weapon," you must go through extensive background checks and fingerprinting. You must apply to the federal government (ATF) for permission, then wait six months or longer to be "approved" by the ATF.

Gun Myth: The Second Amendment is about hunting

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting or personal defense. It has to do with the People of America maintaining a military force for the sole purpose of overthrowing a government that becomes too tyrannical. That is the 100% documented, non-debatable intent of the Second Amendment.

Tench Coxe was one of our nation's founding fathers. He was a consultant to Thomas Jefferson and his newspapers were instrumental in publishing the truth during a time with British troops had DISARMED the colonial populations and banned all guns. Why did they ban guns? So that the people could not fight back against tyranny, of course.

It is too bad the despicable Journal News Publisher and Editors did not take into account this Video.

You can see Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?

A great pro-Second Amendment blogger retaliated to the Marxists of the Journal News. He published the personal information of Journal News staffers.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 7, 2013

Tell Congress Enough is Enough! NO NEW TAXES!

Dear Patriots,

Less than a week ago, in a deal to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff," President Obama and Congress voted to raise taxes on 77% of Americans. But a $620-billion tax hike isn't enough for Democrats in Congress.


They want more of your money to finance their ridiculous efforts to tax and spend America to prosperity. On CBS' "Face the Nation" yesterday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told host Bob Schieffer that Democrats weren't done raising taxes in the wake of the "fiscal cliff" deal:
"The president had said originally he wanted $1.6 trillion in revenue," Pelosi explained. "He took it down to $1.2 as a compromise. In this legislation, we had $620 billion, very significant, high-end tax -- changing the high-end tax rate to 39.6 percent. But that is not enough on the revenue side."
Pelosi also said that, if she were president, she would go around Congress and invoke the 14th Amendment to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling. Click on the image below to watch a portion of her CBS interview:

The former House Speaker's comments raise huge red flags for conservatives:
"This is scary, folks," says Eric Odom, managing director of LibertyNEWS, the official news division of Grassfire Nation. "Pelosi makes it clear that she believes Congress should have no authority to stop President Obama from spending. In typical Leftist fashion, Pelosi ignores the fact that cuts to government can have the same outcome as tax increases. Apparently, scaling back a bloated and unnecessary government is not on her agenda. Blank checks are the name of the Democrat game."
A "fiscal cliff" plan that includes $41 in tax hikes for every $1 in spending cuts -- one that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, raises the deficit by $4 trillion over the next ten years -- still doesn't satisfy President Obama and the Spend-ocrats.

Pelosi and her fellow Democrats want you, the American taxpayer, to finance their spending binges by skirting the U.S. Constitution and forcing you to write them one blank check after another -- for whatever they deem essential to enacting their far-Left agenda.

+ + Tell Congress, "Enough is enough! NO NEW TAXES!"

But Grassfire Nation says enough is enough! We're asking you to join with tens of thousands of fellow team members who are telling Congress, "NO NEW TAXES!"

Last month, we launched a citizen petition that enables you to make your voice heard on Capitol Hill. Go here now to sign our NO NEW TAXES petition:

As of today, we want you to oppose this Congressional money-grab. Grassfire wants to hand-deliver more than 100,000 signatures to key leaders on Capitol Hill this week!

We are so close to our goal. But we won't reach it in time, unless we hear from team members, like you, who are willing to make a difference.

We want Congress to hear the voices of angry patriots calling out, "NO NEW TAXES!" Demand real, principled leadership at this critical time by taking immediate action! Sign Grassfire's important NO NEW TAXES petition by going here now:

+ + Alert Your Friends

After signing, be sure to alert your friends and family members -- urging them to stand with you by signing our citizen petition. This grassroots effort requires our team members to reach out to others who have yet to take action.

Encourage them to click here to be included in this important petition delivery on Capitol Hill.

Thank you for your support.

The Grassfire Team

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Obama’s M.O. (Modus Operandi)

Greetings  Democrats, Progressives, Leftist Liberals, Socialists, Communists, Marxists, Obama Aficionados, Clueless & Careless Voters, Haters of Republicans, those foolish  Founding Fathers and that outdated Constitution:

As a public service to you, this writer offers a brief tutorial to explain how the President you’ve just re-elected views his job and his M.O. – that is, his manner of working.

At the outset, it must be understood that Barack Hussein Obama abhors decision-making.  He much prefers to just ‘wing it’ and make platitude-filled speeches.  To that end, he has over the entire course of his public life, refined his skills at avoiding unpleasant decisions and avoiding the consequences of not making decisions.

Here is a partial list of his avoidance techniques-of-choice:

1   1. Kicking the can down the road so that the clock will run out and no blame can be attached to him.  Some issues might require repeated kicking.
2   2.   Leave town – any excuse will do . . . fund-raising, vacation, fund-raising
3   3.    Tell lies & whoppers and send surrogates out to tell lies & whoppers
4   4.    Blame Republicans in the Congress for being obstructionists
5   5.    Point the finger of blame at the nearest scapegoat, anyone will do
6   6.    Makes speeches railing against the unfair success of the accomplished
7   7.    Threaten new taxes and mandate more Government control over individuals
8   8.    Play the Race Card; always a guaranteed avoidance technique
9   9.    Employ class welfare, pitting poor against rich, illegal against legal, etc.
1   10. If all else fails, pull out ‘old reliable’ – blame George W. Bush

There are of course, many more such avoidance tools in Obama’s bag of tricks however, I did promise to be brief.  Certainly, you must have gotten the picture by now so, if you are awaiting  a decision regarding the multitude of unresolved issues that reach the Oval Office – i.e., breaches to our national security; erratic foreign policies; the wretched economy; the horrendous national debt; the out-of-control spending; the tyrannical taxing; the hidden time-bombs in ObamaCAIR – to name a few. . . I’m afraid you’ll just have to keep on waiting.   The sandy beaches of Hawaii get first priority for this President you decided to re-elect.   

It was a difficult decision for Obama but, he finally made it - - and he’s sticking to it.

Written by MORT KUFF  

Read more MORT’s meanderings HERE

Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 4, 2013

We Must Stop Radical Islam

Islam is the wrong path says an Ex-Muslim.

Muhammad in his Quran permits husbands to beat their wives. Yet Hillary Clinton and Barry Soetoro love to fund these radical Islamists.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Main Stream Media Ignored This Theater Shooting and Gun Bans Don't Reduce Violent Crime

There has been lots of talk about gun control by the scumbags in the main stream media, drug user celebrities and liberals in general. This was anticipated following the shooting in an Aurora, Colorado theater at the opening of The Dark Knight Rises. It escalated over the next couple of months until the shooting that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

Because so many young children were killed, the emotional response was increased, but I’ll bet most people never heard of a shooting that took place at a theater just two days after the one in Newtown and for good reason; it didn’t go with the liberal’s agenda.

On the Sunday of, December 16, 2012 a man entered a movie theater in San Antonio, Texas for the sole purpose of killing his ex-girlfriend, because she had broke up with him. The gunman, 19 year old Jesus Manuel Garcia, apparently did not complete his task. He opened fire in the theater which caused mass panic. People were running for cover and rushing towards exits, according to police and witnesses.

At least two people were wounded in the shooting.

So why was there not widespread news footage covering this event? The shooter was stopped. The Santikos Mayan Palace 14 Movie Theater also houses a small restaurant. The shooting began in the restaurant and as people went for cover, Garcia began to fire outside at an unmarked police car. He then moved to the theater where off duty Bexar County Sheriff Officer, Sgt. Lisa Castellano, who was working the theater, chased Garcia to the back of the theater and cornered him in the men’s room, shooting him several times and taking his gun.

Detective Louis Antu, spokesman for the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office, said, “She took all appropriate action to keep everyone safe in the movie theater.”

Armando Oguin, an off-duty San Antonio Independent School District police officer restrained Garcia with handcuffs. He was then taken to San Antonio Military Medical Center, where he was in stable condition in intensive care the following Monday.

It is, because the shooting was stopped by an off duty officer and the fact that the crime was not committed with an AR-15 has something to do with why this did not get mass coverage. Most of the MSM and so-called journalists are always looking for bad news on Police Officers. The majority of the MSM despise our Military and Law Enforcement Officers. The fact that no one killed probably adds to that. So what was used? A Glock 23, according to this report.

The Glock 23 is a .40 caliber handgun that holds 13 rounds in its magazine and 1 in the chamber. This is one of hundreds of handguns that would come under Senator Feinstein’s “Assault Weapons Ban” bill. Of course, no AR-15 rifle for the media and the left to call for more bans on alleged “assault weapons” and there was not mental health issues for anyone to jump on either.

This really should speak volumes for the media’s silence. Yes, the person that stopped the shooter was a police officer, but consider she was off duty and allowed to carry her weapon at the theater.

The point is that the good guy, or in this case, the good gal, had a gun to stop the bad guy. Otherwise, everyone else was a potential victim. Sgt. Castellano is to be congratulated for her bravery and ending what could have potentially been a deadly situation.

After contacting the movie theater I learned that they openly display signs, just like at the Aurora theater, which read that concealed weapons are not allowed. Therefore, it seems that once again a theater takes it upon itself to create victims, rather than empower individuals to protect themselves. Obviously the criminal, Mr. Garcia, paid no attention to the law or the signs.

Garcia was charged with attempted capital murder of a police officer, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. His bail was set at $1 million.

Actually, if the Australian Bureau of Criminology can be believed, Americans would be insane to concern themselves with what non-Americans think about American gun rights.

In 2002 — five years after enacting its gun ban — the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner.

Even Australia’s Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:

In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent. Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent. Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.

Moreover, Australia and the United States — where no gun-ban exists — both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:

Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America’s rate dropped 31.7 percent. During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent. Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent. Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent. At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent. Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

So, if the USA follows Australia’s lead in banning guns, it should expect a 42 percent increase in violent crime, a higher percentage of murders committed with a gun, and three times more rape. One wonders if Freddy even bothered to look up the relative crime statistics.

The International Crime Victims Survey, conducted by Leiden University in Holland, found that England and Wales ranked second overall in violent crime among industrialized nations. Twenty-six percent of English citizens — roughly one-quarter of the population — have been victimized by violent crime. Australia led the list with more than 30 percent of its population victimized. The United States didn’t even make the “top 10″ list of industrialized nations whose citizens were victimized by crime.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Mark Levin on the Fascist Party aka the Democrats

Is the Democrat Party becoming a fascist party?

Mark Levin states "I'm starting to think the Democrat Party should rename itself the Fascist Party. Its love of an all powerful, centralized government, and contempt for independent, successful individuals, are traits of a fascist mentality".

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

ObamaCare includes Racial Preferences and Death Panels for Senior Citizens

The New Year starts with a bang as Obamacare aka obamatax kicks in. Obamacare can get rid of the People Obama hates the most. Barry Obama can get rid of Old White People in one fell swoop with Obamacare. The disgusting Marxist Regime has Death Panels and racial preferences loaded up in Obamatax. Should we call it Soetorotax and Soetorocare now?

Yes it is true that ObamaCare includes racial preferences, called "priorities" in the law. When the first version of ObamaCare appeared in a bill, I wrote about the racial preferences in it here for American Thinker on July 21, 2009. Now that we have a final version of the law, it is reasonably safe to elaborate how those preferences have evolved.

Under ObamaCare, if a medical or dental school wants to increase its chances of receiving many different kinds of grants and contracts from the federal government, it should "have a record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities." This is because ObamaCare requires the secretary of health and human services to give priority to the entities that have demonstrated such a record in the awarding of these grants and contracts to medical and dental schools and other entities.

ObamaCare does not state what would qualify as a "record" of such training, so we can expect medical and dental schools and the other entities to do whatever they think they can get away with to train as many "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities" as necessary to have a better "record" in this regard than their competitors. Soetorocare or ObamaCare creates a significant financial incentive for medical and dental schools and other entities to lower admission standards for "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities" if that is what it takes to have the winning "record" of such training.

In Section 5301, ObamaCare states that the HHS secretary:

... may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, ... [a] school of medicine or osteopathic medicine ... which the Secretary has determined is capable of carrying out such grant or contract --

(A) to plan, develop, operate, or participate in an accredited professional training program, including an accredited residency or internship program in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, or general pediatrics for medical students, interns, residents, or practicing physicians as defined by the Secretary[.]

ObamaCare then states that the "[s]ecretary may make grants to or enter into contracts with accredited schools of medicine or osteopathic medicine to establish, maintain, or improve ... programs that improve clinical teaching and research in" the fields defined above, or "programs that integrate academic administrative units in" the fields defined above "to enhance interdisciplinary recruitment, training, and faculty development."

In a subsection entitled "Priorities in Making Awards," ObamaCare states: "In awarding grants or contracts under" the paragraphs quoted above, "the Secretary shall give priority to qualified applicants that ... have a record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups[.]"

ObamaCare's race-based "priorities" extend to dental education as well. Section 5303 of ObamaCare states that the "[s]ecretary may make grants to, or enter into contracts with, a school of dentistry, public or nonprofit private hospital, or a public or private nonprofit entity" for the following purposes:

(A) to plan, develop, and operate, or participate in, an approved professional training program in the field of general dentistry, pediatric dentistry, or public health dentistry for dental students, residents, practicing dentists, dental hygienists, or other approved primary care dental trainees, that emphasizes training for general, pediatric, or public health dentistry;

(B) to provide financial assistance to dental students, residents, practicing dentists, and dental hygiene students who are in need thereof, who are participants in any such program, and who plan to work in the practice of general, pediatric, public heath dentistry, or dental hygiene;

(C) to plan, develop, and operate a program for the training of oral health care providers who plan to teach in general, pediatric, public health dentistry, or dental hygiene;

(D) to provide financial assistance in the form of traineeships and fellowships to dentists who plan to teach or are teaching in general, pediatric, or public health dentistry;

(F) to meet the costs of projects to establish, maintain, or improve predoctoral and postdoctoral training in primary care programs[.]

In a subsection entitled "Priorities in Making Awards" ObamaCare states: "With respect to training provided for under this section, the Secretary shall give priority in awarding grants or contracts to the following ... [q]ualified applicants that have a record of training individuals who are ... from underrepresented minorities."

Apart from the legality of such "priorities" under the U.S. Constitution and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the unfairness to those who are not "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities," ObamaCare will foster the racial preference or "priority" climate that continues to stigmatize and demean those individuals who receive the preferences or "priorities." For example, if you know nothing else about two university students, except that one was probably admitted under a program where intellectual standards were reduced and the student received a preference for being the child of an alumnus, and the other was admitted under more rigorous intellectual standards without receiving any non-merit-based preference, what are you going to think about these two students? Is the answer any different when the preference is based on race rather than an alumni relationship?

A non-merit-based preference program based on an individual's physical appearance or surname is no less a "badge of inferiority" than the one condemned in Brown v. Board of Education. Thanks to ObamaCare's racial preference or "priority" program, which provides a financial incentive for medical and dental schools to lower admission standards for "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" or "from underrepresented minorities," those individuals at these medical and dental schools and other entities, including those who deserved admission without the racial preference or "priority," will wear that badge.

Anyone over 70 will not receive curative care under the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare)"), which has the explicit task of reducing the rate of growth in Medicare expenditures. It will implement the rationing by Medicare reimbursement rates to physicians and hospitals for medical procedures, therapies, drugs and so forth. By setting reimbursement rates prohibitively low, IPAB will have a strangle hold on what treatement is provided to which "units." Although the reimbursement rates established by IPAB are technically only “recommendations,” under the law these “recommendations” automatically go into effect unless Congress overrules the agency’s decisions, a highly unlikely occurrence.

The IPAB rationing board will have unprecedented control over patients’ personal medical decisions, but limited medical expertise. ObamaCare limits IPAB's membership of doctors who have real experience caring for patients, selecting instead numbers-crunchers focused only on costs.

During the past presidential debates, Barry Hussein Obama repeated his support for the controversial Medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) — which can be called “death panels”.

Government bureaucrats, especially Racists and Marxists, should not be making the health decisions that impact millions of Americans

Bookmark and Share