Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Tale of Two Houses

House #1
A 20 room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400 per month. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern 'snow belt' area. It's in the South.

House #2
Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every 'green' feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground.

The water (usually 67 degrees F) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.


HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; It is the home of CON Artist, I mean the 'Environmentalist' Al Gore.

HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas; it is the residence of the Ex-President of the United States, George W. Bush. A President with CLASS not like our current knuckle-head.

THIS is the definition of an "inconvenient truth"!

I sure hope this gets passed to everyone!

Hat Tip to B, #sgp !!!

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Barry Drops Prosecution of USS Cole

No surprises here? Barry Soetoro lets Muslim terrorists go free? What have the Left Wing Traitors done to America? The people of Illinois who put this Chicago Thug into office as Senator, started this destruction. To the Illinois Voters who backed Barry, you are a bunch of ignorant (Yes, I said Ignorant because so much information was out there on Barry and his low-class associates) politically Correct Traitors!
This article below was in the Great "Atlas Shrugs".

Hat Tip to Mr. I

Obama Drops Prosecution of USS Cole

Obama is dropping the case against the Cole bombing, a jihadist act of war. In October 2000, the Cole was attacked by Muslim terrorists in a homicide attack in the Yemeni post of Aden. Seventeen sailors were killed and thirty-nine were injured, and the ship was damaged.

Today we hear they are dropping the case. Another big fat lie, to what end? To advance what agenda? Whose interests? Certainly it's not America's.

Obama Administration Halts Commission Trial Against Cole Bomber NRO

It’s a sleepy Friday in late August, the president is on another vacation, Congress is out of town, no one is paying much attention. What better time for the Obama administration to pull the plug, once again, on military commissions? This time, it has halted the case of top al-Qaeda operative Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who was to be prosecuted by a military court for the Cole bombing. The Washington Post report is here, and Jen Rubin has thoughts at Contentions.

None of this is terribly surprising. Prosecuting the Cole case by military commission sticks in the Left’s craw because it shows the incoherence of the Obama/Holder position. They want to treat the war like a crime and endow our enemies with all the rights and advantages of civilian courts; yet, they went military in the Cole case, despite the fact that there is a pending Justice Department civilian indictment addressing that attack. There can be only one explanation for that: they are afraid the case against Nashiri is weak and might not hold up under (slightly) more exacting civilian court due process. That is, the Obama/Holder position is not principled — for all their “rule of law” malarkey, they are willing to go where they have the best chance to win. But there were no military commissions when the Cole was bombed, so what is the basis for trying it militarily? Answer: the 9/11 attacks and the ensuing war . . . except the Left doesn’t accept that it’s a war and the administration wants to prosecute the 9/11 plotters in civilian court. None of it makes any sense.

I have been saying for a while now: Keep your eye on the civilian prosecution against Ahmed Ghailani, one of the embassy bombers. That case is now pending in Manhattan federal court before Judge Lewis Kaplan, who has made significant rulings in favor of the government — declining to throw the case out on the grounds of “torture” and delay. As I said back in May:

It is . . . worth noting that Ghailani is not charged just with blowing up the embassies. The indictment against him alleges the overarching al-Qaeda conspiracy to murder Americans — going back to 1991. The same indictment, with a few tweaks to add the terrorist rampages that occurred after the embassy bombings, could easily be used to charge the 9/11 plotters, as well as other enemy combatants.

Despite all the outrage it stirred, Attorney General Holder has not abandoned his push for a civilian trial of [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9/11 plotters] in New York. Don’t be surprised if the Justice Department uses the Ghailani ruling to argue that the naysayers’ concerns about giving KSM a soapbox are overblown. Don’t be surprised if Justice tries to slide the 9/11 attacks right into the embassy-bombing indictment. That would land KSM squarely before Judge Kaplan.

More Andy McCarthy here.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Traitor Reporters Plotted to Help Barry & Rev. Wright

Andrew Breitbart identifies America’s true adversaries for a tea party and that is Lefty traitor reporters.

In one instance, Lowlife, TRAITOR Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with the RACIST Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.” The Saul Alinsky way, Barry's Hero!

Click HERE for the article on TRAITOR media plotting to kill stories about Rev. Racist Jeremiah Wright. You remember Wright, the close spiritual advisor to "Bowing Barry"?

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

2 yrs., 4 months & counting

Putting my thoughts down will probably earn me labels such as, bigot, racists, cynic and some others I hadn't thought of.

Barack Hussein Obama more than likely was born in Hawaii, but because his camp refuses to produce a legitimate copy causes the birther controversy. I also don't believe he is Muslim. I think his up bringing has a tremendous influence on the way he looks at Islam and his relationship with it. I believe at one time he may have followed the Koran due to circumstances in his youth and family condition.

I don't think he is a serious Christian; identifying himself as such only to promote and further his ambitions. He wants to be all things to all people and be loved like a Rap star.

Fidel Castro came down from the hills a hero, but turned into an oppressor, worse than Batista. Obama rose out of Chicago's political machine, to some a Savior. Cuba lost its middle class. We are facing redistribution of our toils.

The people are starting to realize who this man is and with each passing day their enchantment is slowly fading away when his motives and in-competency become more evident.

Two years, four months and counting!

Written by George, A Real Conservative

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 23, 2010

Brit warns we must block the mosque at Ground Zero

Pat Condell articulates everything that's wrong about the mosque at Ground Zero.

Call your Members of Congress and/or family and friends in New York and tell them it's critical that we block the mosque. Stop Marxism and Stop Sharia Law!

Hat Tip to Mr. I, a Real Conservative

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Mosque at Ground Zero

Today our local leftist newspaper, the St. Petersburg Times, claimed that the Mosque at Ground Zero is “two long blocks away” from Ground Zero, relying on a report from the Washington Post – which as everyone knows is always 100% correct about everything.

What amazes me is how the leftists in this country have taken up the cause of a culture that threatens to bring us back to the dark ages and how they have completely distorted the facts.

What follows is a letter I wrote to the Times and which, no doubt, will be ignored.

Mosque at Ground Zero
First, for more than 25 years I worked in the Woolworth Building which is next to the World Trade Center and the proposed Mosque (previously Syms and after that the Burlington Coat ). I walked from the PATH station to the Woolworth Building daily and it took me less than a minute. The statement that the Mosque is “two long blocks” away is false: they are two normal city blocks away. Further, the Trade Center was clearly visible from the Burlington Coat Factory store. There are no “long” blocks in that area of downtown Manhattan and I suggest that the St. Petersburg Times would be better off checking facts on its own rather than relying on the Washington Post.

Second, one question that is not addressed is why isn’t St. Nicholas Church, the ONLY church destroyed on 9/11 and across from Ground Zero, getting the same fast track treatment as the Mosque? St. Nicholas existed for many years. Yet the Port Authority and politicians in favor of the Ground Zero mosque have done nothing to help St. Nicholas. Up until now the church has not gotten cooperation from the Port Authority. In fact, former Governor Pataki was recently quoted as saying that he did not understand why the Port Authority has put roadblocks in the way of reconstruction of the church.

Shouldn’t the arguments about religious freedom apply to St. Nicholas, a church with a presence at Ground Zero? Why aren’t liberal politicians, Obama, and the St. Petersburg Times expressing outrage about the treatment St. Nicholas is getting?

From Jim P., a Real Conservative

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 21, 2010

politically catastrophic Obama & GROUND ZERO Mosque

If it talks like a muslim, prays like a muslim & BOWS like a Muslim, it's probably a Muslim!

Yes, we are still saying GROUND ZERO Mosque even though the Politically Correct Nazi Media is trying to stop that term "Ground Zero Mosque". Check This Post On Radical Islam!

The Nazi Media and their Saviors (Democrat Party) will not be happy until Sharia Law is welcomed in every home. I ask again, to the Liberal Women of America. Will you be happy when you are forced to ride in the trunk of a car or be "legally" beaten by your Husband? Liberal Women, you are disgrace to America. Conservative Women Rule!

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 19, 2010

One Picture Worth One Thousand Words

This was hard to post because it's so unbelievable, but there it is...
This one picture says it all...
Ok, all you fighters for immigrants rights. Here is one of the reasons we, as the ones that have to pay for welfare of these illegal immigrants , depriving the natural citizens, have a problem with it. One of the several reasons the U.S.A. is falling apart, too.

"Getter Done Arizona"! Video Link HERE

Click on Picture for better Viewing
Enough said. . .

Hat Tip to George, a Real Conservative

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Why Barry Does Not Address Connecticut Shootings

We have a post regarding the Connecticut Murderer. The question is asked, "why is Barry not commenting on this"? The Murderer happens to be Black and was caught on tape stealing. Now I do not know how racism can be called against Whites if they have the guy stealing caught on tape? I think any Business Owner wants good employees be they black or white. If this Murderer killed all White People, is that not a Hate crime? Of course not, as the Reverend Race Baiters (Sharpton, Jackson etc) get the last word on that. Also mentioned is how Barry was close to Ayers and Rev Wright. Remember we had this Video of Ayers and his sicko gang talking about killing WHITE Babies. Well Eric Holder can just look in the mirror to find a Coward and the same with barry.
The article below is by the great writer, Jack Cashill.

Why Obama Does Not Address Connecticut Shootings
By Jack Cashill

A week ago, as is well enough known, Omar Thornton shot and killed eight of his coworkers while being escorted out of the building after having been terminated by his employer, a Connecticut beer distributor.

As I write this, President Barack Obama has yet to address this subject in any public way. He is not alone in his restraint. The media have soft-pedaled the motive -- the whole shooting, for that matter. Four days after the fact, my wife, who watches CNN and listens to NPR, had not heard about it. Unlike, say, Oklahoma City or even Columbine, the tragedy served no useful political purpose. Just the opposite.

"You probably want to know the reason why I shot this place up," Thornton told the dispatcher in his final 9-11 call. "This place is a racist place. They're treating me bad over here. And treat all other black employees bad over here, too. So I took it to my own hands and handled the problem. I wish I could have got more of the people." For a media desperately seeking a whiff of Tea Party violence, this was not welcome news.

To the degree that the media have covered the subject, they have largely taken Thornton at his word. "Beer warehouse shooter long complained of racism," read the headline of a typically sympathetic Associated Press article. The AP shies from concluding what it should have: The complaints may have been real, but the inspiration for those complaints ranged from the trivial to the imaginary.

During Thornton's well-paid tenure at Hartford Distributors, there had been no claims of "racial insensitivity" made by him or anyone else through the company's anti-harassment policy, the union grievance process, or state and federal agencies. The company asked Thornton to resign only after he had been caught stealing beer.

Given the higher threshold of proof HR managers require for protected classes, especially blacks -- "If you're white, male, and under 40," one HR exec joked to me, "we just kick your butt out" -- Hartford did not terminate Thornton until Thornton was caught on video stealing. It was not his first offense.

For Obama, this should have been a teachable moment. He could have shown black Americans the extraordinary safeguards the corporate world has put into place to protect their rights. He could have explored the historic roots of the deep-seated paranoia that undermines black self-confidence and explained the burden that paranoia puts on black ambition, but he has done no such thing. In that void, many blacks, and not a few whites, will insist on seeing Thornton as more of a martyr than a madman.

Author Shelby Steele, who is biracial himself, has seen these kind of scenarios played out around him from the time he was a boy in a still-segregated world. In his underappreciated 2008 book, The Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can't Win, Steele dissected Obama's soul with more precision than anyone before or since, and he did so before Obama had won a primary. The book's subtitle, by the way, only seems to suggest a miscalculation on Steele's part. The "win" does not refer to the election.

Obama's dilemma, as Steele sees it, is that in his lifelong quest to seem an "authentic" black man, Obama feels compelled to exaggerate the state of black victimization. Rather than fixing problems, many of which are generated within the black community, the newly authentic Obama fixes blame.

When Obama has attempted to address moral issues, some more authentic black leader can be counted on to slap him down, as Jesse Jackson did in July 2008 when he threatened "to cut his nuts off." This posture does not make for a useful governing strategy. Instead, says Steele, it "commits [Obama] to a manipulation of the very society he seeks to lead."

Unfortunately, Obama did not look to Shelby Steele as a potential mentor. For guidance, he looked to people like Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. The good Reverend relentlessly instructed his congregants, says Steele, "to think and act as if the exaggerated poetic truth of white racism is the literal truth." Writing well before anyone had seen those telltale videos, Steele asks a fundamental question: How could Obama "sit every week in a church preaching blackness and not object"?

Ayers, the man who in Dreams From My Father lent Obama his voice on the subject of blackness, gives all appearances of being white. Skin color aside, Ayers and Obama had much in common. Both grew up in comfortable white households, attended idyllic, largely white prep schools, and have struggled to find an identity as righteous black men ever since.

Although Ayers rages at "structural racism" in all of his books, that rage reaches a primal scream stage in Race Course: Against White Supremacy, a book he co-wrote with wife Bernardine Dohrn after Obama's election. One would think that victory would have eased the pain, but it has done no such thing for Ayers and any number of other radicals, black and white.

Among the eternally irritated tenured radicals is Tim Wise, author of Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama. Self-described as an "Angry White Male" in the title of one of his earlier works, Wise penned his jeremiad post-election precisely to deny whites even a moment of self-congratulation.

In his book, Wise quickly reassures his audience that the "deep-seated cultural malady" of racism has been "neither eradicated nor even substantially diminished by Obama's victory." To support his arguments, he marshals the most outlandish set of statistics I have seen in a book that was not self-published.

Wise, like all believers in institutional racism, sees remediation only through "productive anti-racism and social justice work." In a similar spirit, Ayers rejects any easy "end-of-white-supremacy narrative." He fears that Obama's victory may actually set back the cause of social justice by taking black concerns off the table to preserve the illusion of racial harmony.

For Ayers, social justice means nothing less than communism, albeit with a small "c." In 1993, a year before Dreams was finally written, Ayers would concede in an interview for the book Sixties Radicals, Then and Now, "Maybe I'm the last communist who is willing to admit it."

Listening to these radical voices, Steele believes, has kept Obama a "bound man." He is not allowed to extrapolate from his own experience and preach the value of education, marriage, family, hard work, and success. At exactly the wrong moment, Ayers and Wright crawled into Obama's head and shielded their charge from his better angels.

The duo had the chance to help Obama establish himself as his own man, but instead, they insisted that, to be authentic, a black man must rage at the machine -- which is what Omar Thornton did to the very end, violently. If Obama argued for redemption through self-help, his core supporters, black and white, would deny him his authenticity. For someone who has struggled so long and hard to establish an identity as a black man, that denial is scarier than defeat. This is why, implies Steele, "He Can't Win."

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 16, 2010

The President Without A Country

We have our TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States) standing up for the Mosque. At this point in time I guess that is not shocking. The TOTUS will tell nations like Israel how to run their country (be Tolerant to Terrorists) and then tells Arizona to break the Laws (by allowing ILLEGAL Aliens to run amok in the State and not protecting the legal citizens sounds Illegal to me for those sworn to protect us). I don't want to get into the whole Muslim dad story right now or Radical islam believers paying for his college but why does this TOTUS hate America so much?
We have an outstanding post below. It was written by Pat Boone and suggested by our Conservative friends at "Chuck On The Right Side" .


The President Without A Country
By Pat Boone

"We're no longer a Christian nation." - President barack obama, June 2009

" America has been arrogant." - President barack obama

"After 9/11, America didn't always live up to her ideals."- President barack obama

"You might say that America is a Muslim nation."- President barack obama, Egypt 2009

Thinking about these and other statements made by the man who wears the title of president. I keep wondering what country he believes he's president of.

In one of my very favorite stories, Edward Everett Hale's "The Man without a Country," a young Army lieutenant named Philip Nolan stands condemned for treason during the Revolutionary War, having come under the influence of Aaron Burr. When the judge asks him if he wishes to say anything before sentence is passed, young Nolan defiantly exclaims, "Damn the United States ! I wish I might never hear of the United States again!"

The stunned silence in the courtroom is palpable, pulsing. After a long pause, the judge soberly says to the angry lieutenant: "You have just pronounced your own sentence. You will never hear of the United States again.. I sentence you to spend the rest of your life at sea, on one or another of this country's naval vessels - under strict orders that no one will ever speak to you again about the country you have just cursed."

And so it was. Philip Nolan was taken away and spent the next 40 years at sea, never hearing anything but an occasional slip of the tongue about America. The last few pages of the story, recounting Nolan's dying hours in his small stateroom - now turned into a shrine to the country he fore swore - never fail to bring me to tears. And I find my own love for this dream, this miracle called America , refreshed and renewed. I know how blessed and unique we are.

But reading and hearing the audacious, shocking statements of the man who was recently elected our president - a young black man living the impossible dream of millions of young Americans, past and present, black and white - I want to ask him, "Just what country do you think you're president of?"

You surely can't be referring to the United States of America , can you? America is emphatically a Christian nation, and has been from its inception! Seventy percent of her citizens identify themselves as Christian. The Declaration of Independence and our Constitution were framed, written and ratified by Christians. It's because this was, and is, a nation built on and guided by Judeo-Christian biblical principles that you, sir, have had the inestimable privilege of being elected her president.

You studied law at Harvard, didn't you, sir? You taught constitutional law in Chicago ? Did you not ever read the statement of John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and an author of the landmark "Federalist Papers": " Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers - and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation - to select and prefer Christians for their rulers"?

In your studies, you surely must have read the decision of the Supreme Court in 1892: "Our lives and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian."

Did your professors have you skip over all the high-court decisions right up till the mid 1900's that echoed and reinforced these views and intentions? Did you pick up the history of American jurisprudence only in 1947, when for the first time a phrase coined by Thomas Jefferson about a "wall of separation between church and state" was used to deny some specific religious expression - contrary to Jefferson ' s intent with that statement?

Or, wait a minute . were your ideas about America 's Christianity formed during the 20 years you were a member of the Trinity United Church of Christ under your pastor, Jeremiah Wright? Is that where you got the idea that " America is no longer a Christian nation"? Is this where you, even as you came to call yourself a Christian, formed the belief that " America has been arrogant"?

Even if that's the understandable explanation of your damning of your country and accusing the whole nation (not just a few military officials trying their best to keep more Americans from being murdered by jihadists) of "not always living up to her ideals," how did you come up with the ridiculous, alarming notion that we might be "considered a Muslim nation"?

Is it because there are some 2 million or more Muslims living here, trying to be good Americans? Out of a current population of over 300 million, 70 percent of whom are Christians? Does that make us, by any rational definition, a "Muslim nation"?

Why are we not, then, a "Chinese nation"? A "Korean nation"? Even a "Vietnamese nation"? There are even more of these distinct groups in America than Muslims. And if the distinction you're trying to make is a religious one, why is America not "a Jewish nation"? There's actually a case to be made for the latter, because our Constitution - and the success of our Revolution and founding - owe a deep debt to our Jewish brothers.

Have you stopped to think what an actual Muslim America would be like? Have you ever really spent much time in Iran ? Even in Egypt ? You, having been instructed in Islam as a kid at a Muslim school in Indonesia and saying you still love the call to evening prayers, can surely picture our nation founded on the Quran, not the Judeo-Christian Bible, and living under Shariah law. Can't you? You do recall Muhammad's directives [Surah 9:5,73] to "break the cross" and "kill the infidel"?

It seems increasingly and painfully obvious that you are more influenced by your upbringing and questionable education than most suspected.. If you consider yourself the president of a people who are "no longer Christian," who have "failed to live up to our ideals," who "have been arrogant," and might even be "considered Muslim" - you are president of a country most Americans don't recognize.

Could it be you are a president without a country?

All who love their Christian Belief's and your Country. Please point them to this post.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 15, 2010

The Other Side of Shirley Sherrod

I still hear politically correct people speak about how Sherrod was railroaded. Ya, her and her Black Liberation theology preaching Hubby are so sweet. She still spouts out about we are better off with a "Black President" and if you do not follow their Nazi Healthcare (Hitler was big on Socialist Healtcare) then you might be a Racist. Are we ever not Racist in their eyes? Well below you will read more on how the Sherrods treat their so-called own People. (I think of all of us as Americans however El Presidente Barrack Trotsky and his ilk are separating us by skin color for reparations and what not).

The insightful and well written story below is by RON WILKINS.

The Other Side of Shirley Sherrod

Imagine farm workers doing back breaking labor in the sweltering sun, sprayed with pesticides and paid less than minimum wage. Imagine the United Farm Workers called in to defend these laborers against such exploitation by management. Now imagine that the farm workers are black children and adults and that the managers are Shirley Sherrod, her husband Rev. Charles Sherrod, and a host of others. But it’s no illusion; this is fact.

The swirling controversy over the racist dismissal of Shirley Sherrod from her USDA post has obscured her profoundly oppositional behavior toward black agricultural workers in the 1970s. What most of Mrs. Sherrod’s supporters are not aware of is the elitist and anti-black-labor role that she and fellow managers of New Communities Inc. (NCI) played. These individuals under-paid, mistreated and fired black laborers–many of them less than 16 years of age–in the same fields of southwest Georgia where their ancestors suffered under chattel slavery.

When I first noticed the story of her firing and the association of Shirley Sherrod’s name with the rural black poor and concern for “black land-loss”, I wondered if the person being praised was the same Shirley Sherrod whom I knew. One piece posted on the July 23rd Alternet and captioned “Shirley Sherrod and the black Land Struggle” even claimed that she “devoted her entire life to economic justice”. The mistreatment of black workers at NCI under the Sherrods is a matter of record that contradicts this claim.

If confession is good for the soul, then Mrs. Sherrod took a first step toward her redemption by admitting the error of her ways in her earlier attitudes toward poor white farmers. Mrs. Sherrod says she began to see poverty as more central than race. So, should indigent black child farm laborers warrant less reflection by Mrs. Sherrod? What lessons does she have to share from her tenure as management when she had power over her own people working under deplorable conditions at the same New Communities, Inc.(NCI) identified in the current issue? Shirley Sherrod could have included this chapter of her history in the same confession speech. Justice and integrity require at least as much accountability from Mrs. Sherrod to the poor black farm workers of NCI as to the white farmers she came to befriend. This lack of full disclosure of the whole truth is a “sin of omission” that trivializes the suffering of poor black farm workers and exacerbates the offenses of NCI.

Shirley Sherrod was New Communities Inc. store manager during the 1970s. As such, Mrs. Sherrod was a key member of the NCI administrative team, which exploited and abused the workforce in the field. The 6,000 acre New Communities Inc. in Lee County promoted itself during the latter part of the 1960s and throughout the 70s as a land trust committed to improving the lives of the rural black poor. Underneath this facade, the young and old worked long hours with few breaks, the pay averaged sixty-seven cents an hour, fieldwork behind equipment spraying pesticides was commonplace and workers expressing dissatisfaction were fired without recourse.

The unfortunate story of Mrs. Annie Hawkins and her family in particular is instructive. Persuaded by NCI that their lot would be improved, the Hawkins family stole away from the Georgia plantation that they had called home. After suffering abuse meted out to them and others at NCI, Mrs. Hawkins sadly stated that, “We stole away from one plantation, but just ended up on another.” For her courageous role in demonstrations against the Sherrods and NCI management, Annie Hawkins and her family were fired and kicked out of the house that they were promised. My last encounter with an ailing Mrs. Hawkins took place several years ago in a nursing home where she resided.

Worker protest at New Communities eventually garnered some assistance from the United Farm Workers Union in nearby Florida in the person of one of its most formidable organizers, black State Director, the late Mack Lyons. The September 28, 1974 UFW newspaper El Malcriado, page two, reported on the worker’s strike (“Children Farm Workers Strike Black Co-op” www.farmworkermovement.org/ufwarchives) and the UFW stepped in to protect black farm workers from exploitation by NCI. Fearful of both UFW efforts to unionize NCI’s labor force and scrutiny by the Georgia State Wage and Hour Division, the Sherrods and NCI management hastily issued checks in varying amounts to strikers to makeup ostensibly for minimum wage differentials. It is bitter irony that the Sherrods have succeeded in being awarded $300,000 following a discrimination lawsuit, while Mrs. Hawkins and other impoverished NCI black laborers whom NCI exploited were never adequately compensated for their “pain and suffering”.

While it is true that loan discrimination and relentless creditors can be cited for the eventual demise of New Communities Inc. in 1985, NCI’s unfair labor practices and poor leadership, were equally, if not more, to blame. Ask Shirley Sherrod about this part of her history. I know this story well, for I was one of those workers at NCI.

Ron Wilkins is a former organizer in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. In 1974, under an assumed name, he hired-on at New Communities Inc. The Emergency Land Fund, an Atlanta-based black land retention organization, which shared oversight responsibility for NCI’s progress, wanted to know the basis for NCI’s continued poor performance. The author’s secondary purpose was to develop agricultural skills. For his role in organizing NCI’s workers, management eventually fired him from his $40 per week position, evicted him from the rent-free shack on NCI property and orchestrated his arrest, on bogus charges, by FBI agents and Lee County, Georgia Sheriff’s deputies in the midst of an NCI labor protest. The charges were later dropped. Presently he is an Africana Studies professor at California State University, Dominguez Hills. He can be reached at: rwilkins@csudh.edu

Bookmark and Share

Friday, August 13, 2010


Is this true??.... I did some of my own research after reading this. Take the time to read the reasons.....Why was his law license inactivated in 2002?

Why was Michelle's (barry's so-called wife) law license INACTIVATED by court order?

There is only one Barack Hussein Obama (aka. Barry Soetoro) according to the U. S. Census and he has 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases.

The one he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is not ever reported to have lived. No wonder ALL of his 'records' are sealed!!!

It just gets worse!!!

At least we only have 3 years of this mystery man left before we can replace him.

Was He There?

Who IS He?

I have always wondered why NO ONE ever came forward from Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc.

NO ONE, not one person has ever come forward from his past.


This should really be a cause for great concern.

To those who voted for him, YOU HAVE ELECTED THE BIGGEST UNQUALIFIED FRAUD that America has ever known!

This is very interesting stuff. Sort of adds credence to the idea of The Manchurian Candidate thing having happened here!

Stephanopoulos of ABC news said the same thing during the 08' campaign. He too was a classmate of BO's at Columbia class of 1984. He said he never had ONE class with him.

Was he there?

While he is such a great orator, why doesn't ANYONE in Obama's college class remember him?

Maybe he never attended class!

Maybe he never attended Columbia ?

He won't allow Colombia to release his records either.

Suspicious isn't it???

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983.

In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a SINGLE PERSON at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me.

I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. EVER! Nobody recalls him.

"Root adds that he was also, like Obama, "Class of '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that.

Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.

At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack!

And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, the macha who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him.

Is that not strange? It's VERY strange. "Obama's photograph does NOT appear in the school's yearbook.

NOTE: Root graduated as Valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School , then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major (in the same class as Barack Hussein Obama WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN IN).

Can it be that BHO is a complete fraud ??

More intrigue concerning "The Man who WASN'T there."

I'm sure the truth will be found out, but too bad not soon enough!

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Ron Klein's Negative Campaign Attacks Allen West

Those of us in South Florida are tired of despicable Democrats ruining our State. We will not forget we had WexLiar (Wexler) as a local Politician yet where did he reside? Kentucky or Detroit or wherever it was, Florida was not his home. This Klein is in the same mold of WexLiar. They promoted Billy Clinton like he was a savior. Now they believe any criticism thrown at HARVARD Barry Soetoro is Racist. Yet, why is not Racist when a lowlife, weasel Democrat launches a campaign of lies about Allen West? Oh I see, only liberals and self Loathing whites and blacks are victims of Racism.

I hope you will read the letter below which was written by Allen West.

Dear Fellow Patriots:

Over the last couple of weeks, it has become apparent that Ron Klein will run a decidedly negative campaign aimed at character assassination since his policies have been a complete failure to South Floridians. As unemployment continues to rise and foreclosures continue to pile up - all under Klein's watch - he is running from his record and has dispatched his political henchmen to do his dirty work.

Insidious child-like name calling emanating from those on the far left is of no consequence to a professional Soldier who has fought in several combat zones. However, there is a clear hypocrisy when you consider any statement against President Obama's policies results in claims of racism, while a decorated combat veteran gets called a "dangerous extremist." Yet again, we see the fear and desperation of liberals when a minority political figure escapes their modern day plantation and promotes a conservative ideology of individual responsibility and accountability, free market solutions, American values and leadership, and national security.

Maybe Klein and his political hacks need a history lesson. The British once called our Founding Fathers radicals and extremists, but all Americans today call them Patriots.

As Klein and his ultra-Liberal supports try to rob the citizens of South Florida of a campaign based on issues and substance, I will continue to run a campaign that will clearly contrast the choices the voters have on November 2nd. I will go to Congress and cut taxes - Klein has and continues to support tax increases. I aim to cut government spending, while Klein has voted for numerous massive spending increases. I will work tirelessly to enact policies that will unleash the American worker and strengthen small businesses. Klein's policies have stifled our economy.

It comes down to a simple question - are the good people of District 22 better off today than they were in 2007? If not, the choice on November 2nd is clear.

Steadfast and Loyal,

LTC (Ret) Allen B. West
Please support Allen West HERE

Bookmark and Share

Ann Coulter is Brilliant not BARRY!

Ann Coulter brings some common sense to the CBS Early Show. CBS owes apology for lying about T-Party using N'Word! Ann is brilliant not sherod, harry reaid, barry soetoro or his wife.
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Liberals' Proclivity for Violence

STOP MARXISM has an article below by the great, Ann Coulter. She points out the moderates and so-called Republicans playing the middle. I feel there is NO MIDDLE when you consider, protecting our Country, keeping taxes low, stopping Illegal Immigration and fighting the Racist Left Wingers. Reading our past report, Marxist Lefties HERE. You will see the Left using the Marxist rules to attack the Tea Party and Conservatives as Racists. All lies of course.

Portion below by Ann Coulter

While engaging in astonishing viciousness, vulgarity and violence toward Republicans, liberals accuse cheerful, law-abiding Tea Party activists of being violent racists.

Responding to these vile charges, conservative television pundits think it's a great comeback to say: "There is the fringe on both sides."

Both sides? Really? How about: "That's a complete lie"? Did that occur to you simpering morons as a possible reply to the slanderous claim that conservatives are fiery racists?

The most notorious accusations of "racism" at anti-Obama rallies so far has consisted of the allegation that one black congressman was spat on and another called the N-word 15 times at an anti-ObamaCare rally on Capitol Hill last March.

The particularly sensitive Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., perhaps walking too closely to a protester chanting "Kill the Bill," was hit with some spittle -- and briefly thought he was a Freedom Rider! When observers contested Cleaver's account -- with massive video evidence -- he walked back his claim of being spat upon.

The slanderous claim that a protester called the civil rights hero John Lewis the N-word 15 times was an outrageous lie -- never made by Lewis himself -- but promoted endlessly by teary-eyed reporters, most of whom cannot count to 15.

The media never retracted it, even after the N-word allegation was proved false with a still-uncollected $100,000 reward for two seconds of video proof taken from a protest crawling with video cameras and reporters hungry for an act of racism.

When St. Louis Tea Party co-founder Dana Loesch did make the point on CNN that no one spat on any black congressmen at the anti-ObamaCare rally, a liberal on the panel, Nancy Giles, told her to "shut your mouth," while alleged "comedian" Stephanie Miller repeatedly called Tea Party activists "tea baggers."

It's like watching Hitler hysterically denounce Poland for being mean to Nazi Germany while Polish TV commentators defend Poland by saying, "There are mistakes on both sides."

Meanwhile, we do have video proof of the New Black Panthers standing outside a polling station in Philadelphia in 2008 with billy clubs threatening white voters who tried to vote. And there is video footage of Sarah Palin, Karl Rove, Condoleezza Rice as well as a slew of conservative college speakers being assaulted by crazed liberals.

We also have evidence of liberals' proclivity for violence in the form of mountains of arrest records. Liberal protesters at the 2008 Republican National Convention were arrested for smashing police cars, slashing tires, breaking store windows, and for possessing Molotov cocktails, napalm bombs and assorted firearms. (If only they could muster up that kind of fighting spirit on foreign battlefields.)

There were no arrests of conservatives at the Democratic National Convention.

Over the past couple of election cycles, Bush and McCain election headquarters around the country have been repeatedly vandalized, ransacked, burglarized and shot at (by staunch gun-control advocates, no doubt); Bush and McCain campaign signs have been torched; and Republican campaign volunteers have been physically attacked.

It was a good day when George Bush was merely burned in effigy, compared to Hitler or, most innocuously, compared to a monkey.

In the fall of 2008, Obama supporters Mace'd elderly volunteers in a McCain campaign office in Galax, Va. In separate attacks, a half-dozen liberals threw Molotov cocktails at McCain signs on families' front yards in and around Portland, Ore. One Obama supporter broke a McCain sign being held by a small middle-aged woman in midtown Manhattan before hitting her in the face with the stick. These are just a few acts of violence from the left too numerous to catalog.

There were arrests in all these cases. There was, however, absolutely no national coverage of the attacks by Obama supporters.

Obama is in danger from the Tea Partiers! The Poles are mobilizing on the border!

Since Obama became president, the only recorded violence at Tea Parties or Town Halls has been committed by liberals. Last fall, a conservative had his finger bitten off by a man from a MoveOn.org crowd in Thousand Oaks, Calif. Two Service Employees International Union thugs have been charged with beating up an African-American selling anti-Obama bumper stickers at a St. Louis Tea Party in August 2009.

Respected elder statesmen of the Democratic Party have referred to Obama's "Negro dialect" (Harry Reid), said he would be getting them coffee a few years ago (Bill Clinton), and called him "clean" (Joe Biden). And that's not including the former Ku Klux Klan Democratic senator, the late Bob Byrd.

So I'm thinking that maybe when conservatives are called racists on TV, instead of saying, "There are fringe elements on both sides," conservative commentators might want to think about saying, "That is a complete lie."

Liberals explode in rage when we accuse them of being unpatriotic based on 50 years of treasonous behavior. They have zero examples of conservative racism, but the best our spokesmen can think to say when accused of racism is: "Man is imperfect."

Conservatives who prefer to come across on TV as wonderfully moderate than to speak the truth should find another line of work and stop defaming conservatives with their "both sides" pabulum.

I hear BP is looking for a new spokesman.
Written by Ann Coulter

Bookmark and Share

Friday, August 6, 2010

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Barry Calls Us MONGRELS!

These Obama FOLKS have zero class. The so-called male obama runs around with a chip on his shoulder and blames Bush for all the problems in the 57 States!
His wife demands Americans eat what she wants us to eat meanwhile she shoves everything under the sun down her large orifice.
So now after Barry Soetoro apologizes for America to every lowlife Dictator and Commie, Barry then calls us Mongrels? Zero Class! Zippo!

This portion below is by Sam Youngman
Obama calls African-Americans a ‘mongrel people’

President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are “sort of a mongrel people.”
The president appeared on ABC’s morning talk show “The View” Thursday, where he talked about the forced resignation of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod, his experience with race and his roots.
When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: "We are sort of a mongrel people."
"I mean we're all kinds of mixed up," Obama said. "That's actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it."
The president did not appear to be making an inflammatory remark with his statement. The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as "of mixed breed, nature, or origin," according to dictionary.com.
The race debate was reignited after Sherrod’s firing. Obama also addressed the issue in his speech to the National Urban League 100th Anniversary Convention in Washington on Thursday morning.
But in his interview on “The View,” which was taped Wednesday but aired Thursday, the president said the Sherrod story was prompted when the media "generated a phony controversy."
"A lot of people overreacted, including people in my administration," he said.
By Sam Youngman

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Conservative Women Rule!

What is it with Liberal Women and their failure to think for themselves. How many times do I hear that Sherrod's Husband is the Racist, not her. Well didn't she say that "we are better off with a BLACK president" within the past 18 months? I am not privy to her other racist statements as I can not tolerate her ignorant views. Then there is michelle obama and the meetings with Rev. Wright and other Racist wacko friends of Barry's. You mean this so-called brilliant (cough, cough) Woman can not act for herself and stay away from so many Racists and Thugs?
The wives of Blowhard Gore, Slick Willie Clinton, Edwards, Kennedy's and many other liberals are okay to sit by the side of their Man as they help destroy America?
I bet you don't see Laura Ingraham, Michele Bachmann, Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin Ann Coulter and many other Brilliant Conservative Women staying with some blowhard who is destroying America.
Conservative Women can stand on their own 2 feet and not be a spineless twig like these liberal women .

This Story Here is fantastic information on the Real Sherrod Story.

What will happen one day if these Liberal Women wake up and they are forced to ride in the trunk of a car, ruled by sharia law?

Hat Tip to all the great Conservative Women Bloggers and Conservative Tweeters!

Bookmark and Share

Conservatives Needed in South Florida

Dear Conservative Friends:

I'd like to ask a favor of you.
On Tuesday's, I attend a "Current Events" forum at the Delray Beach Library. You might say that I am the "token" Republican/Conservative at the session, especially now that most of the snowbirds are up north. There was a sprinkling of conservative voices among the snowbirds, but during the summer, of the 35-40 people who show up at the session, most all are liberal oriented, some of the "flaming" type.

Of course, my views are not well received by the "great unwashed" and I have to take the barbs thrown my way. I'm a big boy and I can take it as well as give it, but it would be nice if I had some fellow Republicans/conservatives on hand to back up what I have to say. I'd like the discussion to have some other points-of-view (yours) besides mine thereby deflecting the attention away from me.

The P.R. person at the library said that I should get some like minded people like myself to balance off the "loony liberals" (of course, she didn't say that) who try to dominate the conversation.
So, if you could find the time I'd appreciate it if could try to attend the next session:

Tuesday 10:30 AM at the Delray Beach Library on Atlantic Ave.
(across the street from the Delray Tennis Center).

100 West Atlantic Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444-3662
(561) 266-0194

I'd like to show them that not all the people in Delray, Boynton, and Boca are liberal loons and that the really smart people are of a conservative bent.
Hope you can make it on Tuesday.

Conservative Chuck On The Right Side

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Obama Economy

The Obama economy is so bad that:

1. I got a pre-declined credit card in the mail.
2. Wives are having sex with their husbands because they can't afford batteries.
3. I ordered a burger at McDonald's and the kid behind the counter asked, "Can you afford fries with that?"
4. Exxon-Mobil laid off 25 Congressmen.
5. I saw a Mormon polygamist with only one wife.
6. I bought a toaster oven and my free gift with purchase was a bank.
7. Angelina Jolie adopted a child from America.
8. Parents in Beverly Hills are firing their nannies and learning their children's names.
9. A truckload of Americans was caught sneaking into Mexico.
10. Motel Six won't leave the light on anymore.
11. They renamed Wall Street "Wal-Mart Street."
12. When Bill and Hillary travel together, they now have to share a room.
13. The Treasure Island casino in Las Vegas is now managed by Somali pirates.

From Jim P., a Real Conservative

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 2, 2010

Marxists & Black Liberation Theology Thuggery

When will the slow thinking Americans who lean left wake up? Lachlan Markay has a very insightful article below on the Left attacking Conservatives and Tea Party Members. The Left shouts "Racist" and the fringe Media gives them some running room with the lies. The Left can re-write history all they want. We know they started the KKK, wanted to keep Slaves and still try and keep the poor under their thumb. Even currently we have the Left spouting all the Racist verbiage. Lowlife Sherrods, Biden, Reid, Maxine Waters , Barbara Boxer, Sheila Jackson Jess Lee and on and on!

Left-wing Black Activist Acknowledges Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But 'Effective,' Media Ignore

By Lachlan Markay
What will it take for the media to acknowledge that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, and that liberals have smeared it as such in a naked politicization of race relations? How about a lefty activist admitting just that.

UPenn professor Mary Frances Berry, a leader of the "far-left black political scene," as NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield wrote, penned this astonishing email to Politico, published on July 20:

Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.

Dick Armey could not have said it better.

The strategy is, of course, reprehensible, but members of the Tea Party movement have long suspected that accusations of racism were nothing more than elements of a political ploy motivated by a fear that the movement's influence could spell disaster for Democrats in November and beyond.

Rather than discuss the issues, these smear artists allege racism since it immediately puts political opponents on the defensive, preventing them from pushing lines of argument to which most Americans are sympathetic.

That Berry specifically mentioned joblessness as an issue that can be dodged by crying racism demonstrates just how desperate liberals are to avoid discussing the still-sagging economy. It's a losing issue for Democrats, and their supporters know it. By dubbing the critics of Democratic economic policy racists, they can avoid discussion of the failures of their own policies.

Coverage of this outrageous statement from the mainstream media: practically zero. Hannity has mentioned it a couple times, and Politico, of course, has acknowledged it.

But almost every other major news outlet - ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, Newsweek, Time - has completely ignored the statement, according to a Nexis search. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund mentioned it on CBS's Face the Nation and on CNN Newsroom, but neither outlet covered the topic on its own, or followed up on Fund's statements. Mary Matalin mentioned it on the Situation Room, but once again, it took a conservative guest for the statement to even be acknowledged, and no one followed up.

And of course, the same media outlets ignoring this story have frequently trumpeted accusations of racism directed at the Tea Party as fact. The most notorious example - the alleged racial slurs shouted at Members of Congress before the health care vote - has even recently been treated as fact, despite the complete absence of evidence supporting the accusation.

Maybe Berry's statement will help convince these journalists that they are aiding and abetting not only political character assassination against an organic, Jeffersonian movement, but that they are in fact aiding the degradation of American race relations, as R. Dozier Gray, spokesman for the black conservative group Project 21 notes:

This willful and purposeful use of the race card for nothing more than political gain is toxic to race relations, and Mary Frances Berry must know that. But she evidently does not care. Based on her comment, political posturing takes primacy over whatever real issues regarding race that she might pretend are her calling cards. I have seen this all before. I find it shameful.

—Lachlan Markay is an associate with Dialog New Media

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Where The Big Bucks Are

Running and getting elected to public office, it's not unusual to sell half your soul to the political machine and the other half to special interest groups that are the goose that lays the golden egg, to out spend the opposition. Seldom does somebody emerge with enough backbone to serve the public and not the manipulators behind the scene.

It's been a losing battle reminding those we put into office that they are working for us, not we working for them.

Not that long ago, a usual smug female Senator from a far western state, denigrated a high ranking military officer for addressing her as ma am. She was indignant and chastised him because he didn't address her as Senator; after all, she worked so hard to become one. The arrogance of an Elitist at its peak! Hopefully her constituency will feed her humble pie in November.

The T.E.A.'s movement mirrors my anger, frustration and view toward the privileged leeches in office. We have to replace them with dedicated individuals who have the tenacity to serve without self benefit. They don't have to be Mother Teresa; just honest and forthright with the tax payers money. Is this an impossible dream?

Scratching the surface searching for this illusive dream, William Jefferson,
Charles Rangel, John Conyer's spouse and Maxine Waters do not come to mind. Would the Clintons have been able to shell out a million or better bucks for Chelsea's wedding before he became president?

Public office is turning out to be a very lucrative and profitable business.

Written by George, a True Conservative

Bookmark and Share