Two Bullys, Garofalo and Rosie O'Donnell

So these 2 low-lifes, Rosie O'Donnell and Jeanie Garofalo are at it again. They usually have racist or Anti-American comments. Back when Garfalo said we (Conservatives/Tea Party Goers) where all Racists. You see we can not point out some of the many faults of Barry Soetero or else we must be Racist.

Then O'Donnell slanders Rush? Do these 2 knuckleheads know their Messiah, Barry was a self-described junkie in his younger years. Yes, as Barry was studying Saul Alinsky and Radical programs to overthrow America, he was doing plenty of drugs. Let me remind these 2 Beauts that Rush is not President either. Rush is not in charge of our Military nor the one Barry wants to create, "civilian national security force" kind of like ACORN with Guns.

I feel O'Donnell is fair game after her comments about our Troops, which I won't repeat. How despicable she is for slandering our great Troops. O'Donnell living in Miami should have some knowledge of Dictatorships. Miami Condos News ought to tell their Owners about vile O'Donnell is loving Dictators. If she listened to many of her neighbors, she would realize how bad a Dictatorship is. O'Donnel would be locked up in Cuba for her sexual whatever you call it this week for Political Correctness. Castro would also take their possessions that O'Donnell and Garofalo scammed from America with their talentless acts.

Yet O'Donnell feels we should never have helped hundreds of thousands of people from getting murdered, raped or beaten by her hero, Sadamn. Should we have sat by while Hitler did his thing? Some Hollywood elites were Hitler worshipers for quite some time.

These 2 slime balls, O'Donnell and Garofalo are not attacking Barry for carrying on with the wars. Yet. O'Donnell feels we, the people should not have Constitutional rights to bear arms. Every time they roll out her 50 pound Dome, attached to her 300 pound so-called body, she gets protection. We are not worthy though.

Notice also how these left wing wackos always attack White People? Hmmm, but they are not self-loathing Racists, right?
I can never forget these attacks on our Troops or the slanderous attacks on the Tea-Parties.

We must Support Our Troops as they are always under attack from the Left Wingers. The Left is in constant mode to de-fund the Troops, the very people who fight s the Left has their Freedoms. The troops are thrown under the bus as lowlifes such as O'Donnell and Garofalo would rather give our money to junkies and thugs.

Paul Ryan schools Soetero

Paul Ryan slams Barry Soetero with "Hiding Spending Doesn't Reduce Spending"! This so-called Summit was just a way for Barry to push his radical Maoist agenda. He lectures the other Politicians. He totally disrespected John McCain. I do not always support McCain's ideas but Barry was just rude. Let's STOP MARXISM and vote all the hateful Democrats out of Office asap!

Liar Al Gore Is Lying Low -- for Good Reason

First off, it is very important to address the fact that Earth is not the only planet to be experiencing some climate change in our solar system. Many astronomers have announced that Pluto has been experiencing global warming, and have suggested that it is a seasonal event, just like how Earth’s seasons change as the various hemispheres alter their inclination to the Sun.
However the Left Wing Nazis think we are so strong that we can dictate the Weather. This Global Warming is a Hoax and the Left's religion. Al Gore and Soetero and other Politicians steal our money to fund this gigantic lie.
Rex McBride writes a great article below.

By Rex McBride
Maybe Al Gore's been advised by legal counsel to lie low. He may be the leader of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) movement, but he's not defending it in public, not even when it's falling apart and his new fortune is based upon it.

Mr. Gore and his financial backers earned millions of dollars in start-up "green" companies and carbon trading schemes. If the scam worked, he could've become the first "carbon billionaire."

"What goes up can fall down" applies to ill-gotten gains in the stock market or "carbon trading" schemes. In such schemes, it's foreseeable that trusting investors will (a) not only get hurt when the scam collapses, but they'll also (b) pursue legal remedies and sue him for fraud.

Mr. Gore's financial gains were based on the contradictory and error-plagued assertion that man's release of the trace gas CO2 will fry the planet.

Once it becomes clear to everyone that the AGW theory is based on cleverly manipulated data twisted by rigged computer models controlled by several dozen IPCC politicians/scientists, we can expect that investors who lose millions by investing in these companies will eventually haul Mr. Gore and the insider IPCC scientists into court.

Over the years, American tax dollars were poured down the fantasyland AGW "rat hole." Sooner or later, Al Gore needs to answer some hard questions. Unfortunately, we'll have to wait for lawsuits from private investors. Today, legal counsel will advise him to remain silent.

It's impossible to predict how many lawsuits, or what kind, might arise once everyone realizes that the AGW scam dwarfs Bernie Madoff's $50-billion Ponzi operation. New studies appear almost daily that further undercut AGW theory. The biggest daily newspaper in the Netherlands vindicated that country's leading AGW critic in the article "Henk Tennekes -- He was right after all."

Dr. Tennekes was fired in the 1990s from a prominent research position and blacklisted for debunking AGW theory. He upset the same IPCC scientists who control the leading "peer review" climate research journals and who blocked the publication of all contrary research in those journals for decades.

As investors learn the extent of the scam, Mr. Gore's start-up "green" companies will lose considerable value, like flaky dot-com companies lacking a real product. Investors in these "green" companies -- who reasonably relied upon Gore's alarming claims -- may pursue several possible remedies:

- derivative shareholder lawsuits, disgorging from Mr. Gore and other senior officers in these companies any illicit gains from any insider trading that could be proven; and/or

- lawsuits against brokers who did not perform the SEC's necessary "due diligence" research before peddling those shares; and/or

- civil RICO lawsuits against Mr. Gore and any IPCC scientists who participated in blocking the publication of contrary research, cooking the data, all of whose annual income skyrocketed from the public hysteria.

On the state level, it's impossible to predict if one or more state attorney generals will look back on the tobacco industry cases and decide, representing the taxpayers of his or her state, to file criminal and/or civil RICO actions against Gore and the enriched IPCC scientists.

(On the federal level, while President Obama is in office, the Justice Department will not file RICO or SEC actions against their buddy Al Gore. Remember, the president originally hoped that Boxer-Kerry cap-and-trade would generate over $600 billion in new corporate taxes -- "emergency" measures justified by fantasy AGW theory.

Remember the joke about the government taxing air? In the Twilight Zone of Boxer-Kerry, say hello to cap-and-trade.)

If Mr. Gore's "green" companies do crash and significantly injure private investors, attorneys in a civil lawsuit could compel Gore to answer questions like:

(1) When you claimed that "the science is settled," did you mean that it's "settled" that you and the IPCC scientists could make quick millions by manipulating the data and fomenting public hysteria?

(2) What does "peer review" mean if none of the IPCC scientists who controlled the academic journals protested that there was no original data to support your frightening claim of accelerated temperature increases after 1995?

(3) If the very scientists that the public trusted to act as the "check and balance" against careless research -- or worse yet, to protect against research fraud -- did not catch a "tiny" problem like not having original supporting data after 1995, does "peer review" mean that IPCC's scientists would secretly work in concert to cover each other's asses and keep the grants coming?

Such questions need answers.

In "The Dog Ate Global Warming", an article at the Cato Institute, Patrick J. Michaels noted that "[i]f there are no data, there's no science. U.S. taxpayers deserve to know the answer."

Obviously, Al Gore cannot be compelled to answer questions in a criminal court under the 5th Amendment. However, his admissible bank and stock portfolio records would prove his skyrocketing wealth, making him a "deep pocket."

Since 1970, the scope of RICO cases has grown far beyond prosecuting mafia operations. The law firm Nixon Peabody explained:

RICO was written in broad terms. To state a claim, a plaintiff must allege four elements: (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity... Each element of a RICO claim requires additional analysis: an "enterprise" is marked by association and control; a "pattern" requires a showing of "continuity" -- continuous and related behavior that amounts to, or poses a threat of, continued criminal violations; and "racketeering activity" involves the violation of designated federal laws ...

RICO lawsuits are now won in a wide variety of civil disputes -- e.g., insurance companies working in concert to delay/shortchange payments owed to dentists.

Other RICO cases resulted in court judgments against the Hell's Angels Motorcycle Club, Catholic sex crimes, and Major League Baseball.

It violates federal law to fake taxpayer-funded research and then manipulate or destroy data to enrich oneself. If an insider group secretly conspires to do so, it looks and smells like RICO.

If more AGW-destroying news rolls in, and if Gore's "green" companies lose significant value, then shareholder derivative lawsuits and/or state RICO lawsuits will follow -- more so as the losses grow.

Mr. Gore is in hiding today -- no longer the "courageous" leader of the AGW movement. Apparently, Planet Earth is "no longer in grave danger" or "needing to be saved," but Gore could lose all of his ill-gotten assets.

If the victim list grows and criminal intent is proven, Mr. Gore could do serious time. After a much smaller scam, Bernie Madoff got 150 years.

What if you want answers about the potential misuse of tax dollars that enriched AGW insiders but didn't invest in one of Al Gore's fantasies?

Call Congress and demand that the GAO audit all climate change grants. GAO has the professional audit expertise to follow the money, gather objective facts, and report on any significant fraud or abuse.

The Disturbed PROFESSOR Gates Rant On "Racist White Institutions"

Lately I have been hearing the talk of how WE can not call Obama "Professor". I really do not know what that means but I am sure Political Correctness has some reason for it.
Well then a friend sends me this Video of the Racist PROFESSOR Gates. Low life Gates shows his hatred for Judge Clarence Thomas, for Judge Thomas is not down for affirmative action. Affirmative action, Political Correctness, what is going on with America. Stop Marxism and take our country back from these liberal sickos.
Also, why is that Eva Longoria and her despicable ilk (Hollywood Celebs) are always telling us to back Gates or Obama or some other racist?

So, Let's Recap "2009"...what a year! WOW!

Read and be amazed (stunned) what has happened this past year!
Should we even touch on how the First Lady slammed her 2 daughters as "Pudgy Girls"?
With all the pressure on these Young girls and now they have to be extra skinny to get some respect from the Racist (Yes, she sat with Wright, had meetings with Farrakhan's Wife etc.) Mom.

CAN WE REALLY HOLD ON FOR 3 MORE YEARS?? A VERY SERIOUS QUESTION??

So, Let's Recap "2009".........what a year! WOW!!!

1. The American people inaugurate a half-arab president with a total of 142 days experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state (city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office.
The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and make sure
terrorists civil rights are not violated.
(honest mistake?)

2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric Holder, whose law firm we later find out represents seventeen Gitmo Terrorists.
(An honest mistake?!)

3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience, has a daughter Linda, we find out, who is a true radical anti-American activist and a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the western hemisphere.(There were socio-economic factors involved!)

4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a pig, but it still stinks!)

5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file his own taxes for 12 years.
(He misspoke!)

6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.
(Another honest mistake???)

7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under charges.
(Hmmm... another screw-up?)

8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical conduct.
(Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)

9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of cheating on his taxes.
(I'm running out of excuses for these idiots!!)

10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed.
(Dear God, I am getting a headache!)

All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . but who's counting?

America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges ; Barry, Nancy and Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending!!!"

The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion) pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself [stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!

Only with the Liberals...

Pray for our country.



Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR 24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.

Don't you just love hypocrites?

Obama went to the International Olympic Committee to have them choose Chicago for a host city, he failed.

Obama went to Copenhagen to lecture them on global warming, he failed.

Obama went to new Jersey to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed,

Obama went to Virginia to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed.

Obama went to Massachusetts to promote the Democratic candidate for senator, he failed.

Speaking of praying, Obama has now been president for a full year and yet he & wife (first lady) Michelle, the Christian family they claim to be, have not attended church since the inauguration.

Obama is the 1st president in history who did not attend any Christmas religious observance.

He must miss Reverend Wright!

And finally, he is the 1st president to remain on vacation after a terrorist attack.

In these times I'll keep my God, my freedom, my gun and my money.

Anyone that supports this insanity can keep
"THE CHANGE".

Brain-Dead in Berkeley California

Below is an article of a great Writer living in Liberal Land, aka Berkeley. Having lived near that area, one can never be shocked by the insanity of the Nazi Liberals. They would attack the Victim of a brutal rape and beating and then give the Low-Life Thug Criminal sympathy with an "Ohhhhhh, they must have had a hard life growing up to do something like this" statement. Yes, California Liberals are some of the sickest you were ever find.


A week in the life of an ex-leftist:

Disneyland may be the happiest place on earth, but Berkeley is the looniest. Imagine commingling with people who act like Keith Olbermann on steroids. Not a day goes by where I don't scratch my head in utter disbelief -- not just because of the insanity, but because two years ago, I was one of them!

So here is an actual week in the life. I hope that you enjoy this snapshot of living at ground zero, the birthplace of such peace-loving groups as the Black Panthers. All of the following events are true. The names have been changed to prevent my tires from being slashed.

Monday, Monday:
I am in Whole Foods examining some (non-organic) strawberries. Out of nowhere, a woman charges at me like a mad bull. She launches into an impassioned and very scary tirade about nasty pesticides and poisoned farm workers. I feel lucky to get out of there in one piece (but without strawberries).

Tuesday:
I spend fifty minutes staring at Obama -- well not Barack in the flesh, but his likeness on my young client's t-shirt. Fantasize about closing up shop and hanging up my shingle in Texas. But does anyone in those red states actually need a shrink?

Wednesday:
Head over to my local holistic pharmacy for some personal hygiene products. After handing over the cash to the cashier, she stares at me blankly. I look at her, she looks at me, I look at her, she looks at me...until finally I break the stalemate.

I utter the five most scandalous words in Berkeley: "May I have a bag?" What I actually want to say is, "Do you expect me to carry my intimate female products on my head like they do in the third world?!" -- but instead, I simply glare. Upon exiting the store, I am certain I hear snickering.

Thursday:

Over at my local independent bookstore (which, incidentally, isn't so independent that it would deign to carry a single conservative book), I stop in to pick up a Wall Street Journal. The line is long, and I'm in a rush. Though I'm not in a pissy mood, I might be sending out a serious, no-nonsense vibe.

A woman fondling a Noam Chomsky book sprints over to me and asks, all fake and syrupy-like, "Are you okay?" Befuddled, I respond, "Why do you ask?" (After thirty years in Berkeley, I've learned never to answer a stranger's question directly.)

She answers, "Your energy tells me that something is wrong." (Honestly, I could not make this stuff up.)

I say I'm fine; I shed the Wall Street Journal and race back to my office to foil Berkeley's thought police.

Friday:

Terrific day -- best one so far this week. Strangers have not preached to me; I have seen no Obama bumper stickers. No one has foamed at the mouth about tea parties and Sarah Palin.

Of course, I haven't actually been out of the house, as I'm taking a sick day. This sneezing and hacking is a most welcome respite from the real (surreal?) world.

Saturday:
If ever I need a reminder of why I stay underground, today is the day.

I forward an e-mail to a bunch of Jewish friends and family. It says, "Remember the Holocaust," with graphic photos from Nazi Germany. The text informs the reader that the U.K. may eliminate any mention of the Holocaust from its schools in deference to the Holocaust-denying Muslims.

The e-mail ends with a photo of the World Trade Center in flames, with the words, "Let's not forget 9/11 because we don't want to offend the Muslims."

The e-mail seems innocuous enough, so I dispatch it to people, both left and right. Moments later I hear from a Berkeley friend, Laura, who wrote the following, and I quote: "Dear Robin: I am shocked by this mailing. I am not going to pass it along because of the part that talks about the World Trade Center. I think it stirs up racist hatred of practitioners of Islam in this country, and I don't feel comfortable with that."

I'm tempted to write back, "What has radical Islam done for you lately?" I'm not sure which is more disturbing -- the United Kingdom's erasing the Holocaust, or the American Left pooh-poohing 9/11. The bigger question is this: How in the world did radical Islam amass this much power?

Sunday:

The highlight of my week! My sweetie and I hightail it to a magical, foreign land -- the suburbs! After driving thirty minutes, I know that we are heading in the right direction when the car in front of us displays the following bumper sticker: Liberalism is a Mental Disorder. I laugh uproariously while my leftist hubby scowls his disapproval.

It's a whole new world: No one is all up in my business, the streets aren't trashed, and I only see a handful of Obama bumper stickers.

But the pièce de résistance is when I buy shampoo at CVS and the cashier places the product in a bag without even asking. She does so with a warm smile rather than a contemptuous growl! I now know ecstasy!
****
So, friends, welcome to a slice of Berkeley life! If you like what you've heard, please support any and all Obama policies. Because the far left would love nothing more than to export its thought police and green meanies to a neighborhood near you.

A frequent AT contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist and a recovering liberal in Berkeley.

Marco Rubio CPAC Address

"We are witnessing the single greatest political pushback in American history," said Florida Senate candidate Marco Rubio, one of the rising stars in the Republican Party. A true Conservative, and the RINOs need to step aside for Rubio and Allen West.

ClimateGate Global Warming Hoax

Global Warming is obviously a HOAX! These Politicians (Gore & Soetero) have blood on their hands! They have ripped us off for billions. The Goal of the Global Warming Nazis is to have more control over OUR lives. These hypocrite Politicians and the Junkie Celebrities should be wearing Orange Jumpsuits!

Jihad: The Political Third Rail

Regarding the conference, "Jihad: The Political Third Rail -- What They Are Not Telling You", would be a worthy event to attend. It is so important and yet so many Americans would rather listen to Helen Degenerate on American Idol or the disgraceful Oprah. We must wake up the slow, sleeping Americans. The Terrorist attacks or attempts are growing. Only our TOTUS thinks the Tea Party people (PATRIOTS!) are the "Dangerous" people.
Also we should give a hand to Marco Rubio. I only heard a portion of his speech but it was awesome. We need him in Florida! America needs all the Marco Rubios we can find.
Please read this article below for some real insight.

Great writing by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer
The jihad against America is more active and assertive than ever -- and hardly anyone is talking about it. It is time to take action.

Over one-third of the attempted and successful jihad attacks on American soil since 9/11 took place in 2009. This sharp uptick comes at a time when conservative organizations and media figures are talking about jihad and its root causes in Islamic texts and teachings less frequently and less honestly than at any time since 9/11. At the same time, there is a global initiative at the U.N. and elsewhere to muzzle critics of Islam, criminalizing even honest discussion of the Islamic doctrines that terrorists use to justify jihad violence and Islamic supremacism.

Now we have created an organization to stand up against this silence that threatens to our existence and render us defenseless as our freedoms and way of life are eroded away. We are launching the Freedom Defense Initiative, a new activist group, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) 2010, with a conference entitled "Jihad: The Political Third Rail -- What They Are Not Telling You."

Our nation is at war, and yet our politicians pretend that that war isn't happening. Barack Obama is intent upon trying enemy combatants in that war in civilian courts and making concession after concession to our enemies as if those concessions will make them love us. The mainstream media, both liberal and conservative, and the entire government and law enforcement apparatus appear determined to obfuscate and deny the truth about the enemy's ideology and belief system. This has the effect of minimizing in the minds of Americans the threat just as it is greater than ever and of rendering us blind to very real threats from people and groups that officials seem intent upon assuming to be innocuous.

Like it or not, we are engaged in a defense action against an Islamic jihad -- one whose goals and motives are spelled out in the Koran and the teachings of Islam. Politically correct dissembling about this only makes Americans more vulnerable than they could be or should be.

The conference is designed to speak the truths that others will not speak. It will educate Americans about the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration at the highest levels of the U.S. government, as well as its war on free speech: its attempt to silence and discredit those who speak up against the jihad and Sharia encroachment in the West. Emphasis will be on the international character of the jihad against the West and on how the Islamic war on free speech (and the media's self-imposed blackout on this issue, as in the Fort Hood massacre) is part and parcel of the same jihad against the West that terrorists are pursuing by violent means.

This conference will be held at the Mariott Wardman Park Hotel, the site of CPAC, on February 19, from 10AM to noon. It is at the site of CPAC, but it is an independent event supplying the crucial information that the mainstream media (as well as the conservative establishment) ignores. We chose CPAC because it is the largest gathering of conservatives across America, and so it is the most appropriate place to end the near-universal silence about the true nature and magnitude of the jihad threat against our nation.

The principal speakers will be Steve Coughlin and Wafa Sultan. Wafa Sultan shot to international fame after she stood up for human rights against Sharia on Al-Jazeera in a debate with an Islamic cleric on a famous viral video. She is the author of a blistering indictment of Islam's denial of rights to women and non-Muslims, A God Who Hates.

Steve Coughlin is the former Pentagon Islamic law specialist who is making his first public appearance since he was fired from the Defense Department after pressure from Islamic infiltrators. He has startling information about Islamic infiltration in our government.

Other speakers include Simon Deng, a former slave in Sudan and a leading human rights activist against jihad and Islamic supremacism; Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who is facing "hate speech" charges in Austria for telling the truth about Islam and the Islamization of Europe; Anders Gravers of the group Stop the Islamisation of Europe (SIOE); and Lt. Colonel Allen West, a war hero, Congressional candidate (FL 22nd district), and future national leader who offers a real alternative to Obama's socialism at home and appeasement abroad.

This event is supplying truth that you will not hear elsewhere, and on which hangs the very future of our nation.

We hope to see you there.
By Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer

We Need DDT-Day!

Here is some info on the Malaria situation.
As we see President Bush did more for Africa than probably any other President. Maybe that is why the Libs hate him. Their goal (Nazi Liberals) is to destroy most of the population. It appears Liberals have their sights set on killing or getting rid of as many African children as possible.

In 2000, African leaders vowed to reduce malaria deaths by 50% in ten years. Tomorrow marks the ninth anniversary of the vow, and though it hasn't been fulfilled, we are drawing very close to another marker of malaria's toll: 100 million dead from malaria since the Environmental Protection Agency's 1972 ban on DDT, the insecticide best suited to combat malarial mosquitoes.

For comparison, the total number of people killed by cigarette smoking in the twentieth century is thought to be about 60 million, total casualties from World War II perhaps as high as 70 million, and the total killed by Communist regimes about 100 million. Thus, anti-chemical greens (inspired by Rachel Carson's fear-mongering book Silent Spring) may already be humanity's most prolific killers -- and surely the most widely praised.

Africa Malaria Day was declared on April 25, 2000. President Bush noted Malaria Awareness Day on April 25, 2006. The World Health Organization decided in 2007 to begin marking World Malaria Day, with 2008 officially being the first and tomorrow the second -- with just one year to go before the original ten-year deadline is reached.

To make real progress in time for World Malaria Day 2010, instead of gauging progress by government spending or how many times Jimmy Carter praises bed nets, how about simply getting government out of the way and letting DDT (which, at worst, has been accused, likely incorrectly, of thinning some bird eggshells) do its lifesaving work around the world, as it did in once-malarial Europe and America for three decades before the ban? (I made this point back in 2002, in an ACSH piece cited this year in the New York Times bestseller Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin.)

By means such as bed nets and an impending malaria vaccine, we are making commendable strides in fighting malaria, but this is not a fight we should be waging with the most effective weapon needlessly kept beyond our reach. End the ban. Save millions of lives. Not a hard choice.

#####################################

Here is some great script from a Mark Levin interview on Hugh Hewitt. Mark Levin is extremely knowledgeable of the Liberals and the DDT ban.

And so…but what happened, obviously, is in the early 1960s with Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring, which had more phony science and groups like the Sierra Club, in the end, it was banned in the United States, which means it was banned in most of the free world, which means since most of the free world produces it, Africa went without DDT. Southeast Asia went without DDT. And so the environmentalists succeeded in allowing the death of tens of millions, particularly of children in Africa and other parts of the world, because of their adherence to this. And my point in including that and other examples in the book is here we go again with this global warming, where they want to create a regressive situation not only in the United States, but who will be affected the most? The undeveloped third world where they want to have lights, where they want to have running water, where they want to have food, and they want to do all these things. But instead now, here we go again with now it’s global warming.

Katie Couric: Return of the Palin Slayer

Stuart Schwartz has a great article below. His analogy on the dirtbag, Kouric is spot-on! When will we end this nightmare? Kouric, Rather, Lauer, Brokaw and the low-life Letterman are just a few of the Liberal panty waste, who have blood on their hands. Promoting this Marxist, Soetero? These fringe Media types could not pick up a book and read what this Soetero was about. Wouldn't be nice to put the Fringe Media out of business now?
Stop the Marxism!


By Stuart Schwartz
You know they're worried.

Big government, big media, big Barack -- they're all worried. And they've brought in the knight in designer armor, the savior of all that is Washington and New York and Rodeo Drive, privileged and Democratic -- Katie Couric.

Katie the Palin Slayer is back.

The CBS Evening News anchor is on the cover of Harper's Bazaar this month, all progressive chic and mainstream media glitter. And just a week ago, she genuflected before Barack Obama to open the Super Bowl on CBS.

Call her the anti-Palin. In the 2008 election, the Couric interview with Sarah Palin helped put Obama in the White House and gathered a tsunami of accolades culminating in the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Award from the Metropolitan Opera wing of the Democratic Party, also known as mainstream media. With heavily edited snark, Couric stomped the pretender from the wrong side of the glaciers beneath her Christian Louboutin booties ($1,400 a pair at the Dollar General of establishment journalism, Bergdorf Goodman).

Neither her eighth cover for the glamor magazine nor the Super Bowl interview are meant to inform. Instead, in concert with the White House, Katie is hitting the "reset" button on a failing presidency. I'm-Katie-Couric-and-I'm-here-to-admire-you. Barack, Nancy, Harry, Rahm -- don't worry, got you covered.

They need Katie and her media platform. The Tea Party is gaining ground, The U.S. Congress and Obama job approval ratings are at historic lows, newspapers -- long an arm of the Democratic Party -- are failing at a record rate, and the networks -- bastions of liberalism -- are hemorrhaging viewers.

And -- OMG!!! -- Sarah Palin is back! Quick, hand me the wooden stakes and call Katie! Katie Couric isn't doing journalism; rather (or...Rather), she is 911 for the Obama agenda. The natives are restless, and who better to call on than Katie the Palin Slayer?

And so Katie has again swung into action. Hail the "conquering Couric," the Washington Post exults, "a power broker in stiletto heels." Katie's back, and as Robert Browning might have written had he been funded by a grant from the Obama administration, "the condom's back on the banana -- all's right with the world." (The original line read "God's in his heaven"; this is Obama safe schools czar Browning, National Endowment for the Humanities poetry.)

Of course, she had no choice. You see, Katie hearts Barack. They are part of what New York Times columnist David Brooks proudly calls the "intellectual class," a political and media elite that knows what's best for the rest of us.

And when Barack got into trouble -- not, of course, because he is wrong, but because the rest of us are a "nation of dodos" (as it was put by another media grandee, Joe Klein of Time, the Ivy League, and Bill Clinton's tony New York neighborhood), the White House reached out to Katie.

After all, she had made her bones on Palin, urged on by an intellectual class only too happy to indulge its inner "gangsta." And she remained close to the Obama White House, a guest at its first state dinner and the public face of a network advocating the statist agenda of Obama while questioning the legitimacy of anti-tax citizens.

But the sheep have become surprisingly reluctant to be shorn, and Katie has been called back into service to lead a media charge designed to prevent the nation from throwing away its best chance at progressive transformation. It is hard for a journalistic establishment engaged in "a slobbering love affair," as conservative press critic Bernard Goldberg calls it, to imagine a citizenry rejecting a president so smart that the Washington Post noted in open-jawed wonder that he has pondered the legal implications of Einstein's theory of relativity (never mind that there are no legal implications).

Katie is only too happy to help a nation stuck on stupid, a nation of Palin-loving simpletons incapable of comprehending the genius that is Barack Obama. After all, as Barack once so wisely explained, "My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways."

Wait -- was that Barack? Or was that God...in that book written by a dead Jew named Isaiah? Well, no matter. God, Barack...same difference, according to Newsweek.

And who better than Katie to understand the embattled president? Harper's Bazaar notes that a photograph of her staring at her reflection in the mirror is "iconic." She adores what she sees, as does the president when he looks in the mirror.

And so Katie suited up for the Super Bowl, making sure, in her words, to take an "appropriate tone" that would showcase the president's firm grasp of all that is good and fair. With a Palin resurgence as the backdrop, Katie attempted to point out a simple truth to Americans: Obama is good and Palin is bad.

And so the CBS news executive guides the Obamamedia team into the 2010 battle. And she, like the president, has a people's touch -- or so Harper's puts it. Her Obama-like concern for the less fortunate is evident in every part of her life. Her appearance, for example, on the magazine cover touting her $14-million salary and million-dollar wardrobe coincides with layoffs in the ailing CBS news division that she leads.

"This is complete insanity!" CBS employees facing unemployment complained. But Katie merely smiled a sympathetic smile and said, "I always feel sexy when I'm in a little black dress."

Barack, Katie -- it's all about me. When a library expansion near her $6.3-million summer home threatened to attract children from surrounding middle-class towns, she was one of the homeowners whose representatives urged the zoning board to stop the project. With Obamaesque sensitivity for the chef-less masses, she wanted to protect the children who would feel out of place in a resort town peopled by the likes of Martha Stewart and Jerry Seinfeld.

Imagine the damage to youthful self-esteem, walking by Tiffany and Ralph Lauren and Sotheby Real Estate and checking out a book, only to return at the end of the day to modest homes Palin-large with family. Oh, the horror -- right out of Charles Dickens! Better that they never come. Reading is overrated, anyway.

Katie the Palin Slayer is back, accessorizing with bias and making the nation safe for Obama...and Gucci.
Stuart H. Schwartz is on the faculty at Liberty University in Virginia.

Climate Change Zealots and Radical Islamics

The Global Warming Lunatics are out spinning and lying and stealing again. When there is less snow, the Nazi Global Warming nuts say that's because of global warming. When there is more snow, they say it's because of global warming. Make up your mind, you thieves!
Below are some more points that compare the RED, I mean Green Zealots with the Radical Islamics.

This portion below by the great Ron Lipsman
"Allah is God, Mohammed is His prophet and the Koran is the message." That commonly-used apothegm encapsulates the core belief of the Muslim religion. Well how about: "The Earth is God, Al Gore is its prophet and Global Warming is the message." I would say that this adage sums up the core belief of the climate change crowd.
The analogy goes further. The adherents of the two aphorisms are animated by a religious fervor that is highlighted by an absolute faith in the truth of their saying's content. The followers in both instances are bent on world domination and conversion of all non-believers to their point of view. Their ultimate goal, in each case, is a totalitarian system in which those at the head of the system will determine all aspects of the lives of their followers. And finally, both systems deem their opponents-infidels in the former, skeptics in the latter-as unworthy, misguided, evil and deserving of no succor, mercy or salvation.

The main difference in the two movements is that the former has shown a deep propensity for violence whereas, thus far, the latter has not. But to those of us who doubt the truth of either, both movements treat us with disdain, condescension and disrespect.

What puzzles me is that no one outside the orb of these vicious, globally-oriented and mind-controlling movements has hit on the following seemingly obvious idea. We need to spark a confrontation between them, a situation in which each of the movements sees the other as their main opponent. If each could be convinced to devote their abundant energy toward attacking the other, perhaps both might deliver a fatal blow. How delicious that would be for the rest of us!
By Ron Lipsman

Dissing America

Schools today concentrate on teaching diversity and fairness and Global Warming and promoting a Racist Soetero. History of our Soldiers and Forefathers is supposed to be bad and we have our CIC apologize for us.
Now we have the Angry Michelle telling our kids what to eat as she throws down plates of Ribs and bottles of Champagne. What a shame! We Must Stop Marxism!
Please read this great post by Lloyd Marcus.

By Lloyd Marcus

I struggled with whether or not to discuss this topic. Our Haitian neighbors are suffering tremendously. I am extremely proud and thank God that we, America, were first on the scene, doing what we always do: come to the rescue of people in need. I questioned, "Lloyd, are you making much ado about nothing?" Well, you be the judge.

I am confident that Indianapolis Colts football player Pierre Garçon meant no disrespect to the USA when he waved the Haitian flag after the Colts' victory over the Jets in the AFC championship game. However, I must confess that it rubbed me the wrong way. Please, this is not a rebuke of the young, excited athlete. He simply wanted to give hope and a shout-out to his homeland. I only wish Garçon had waved both flags: the Haitian flag and Old Glory.

Frankly, I feel that taking pride in being an American simply is not what it used to be. In his 1989 farewell speech, President Ronald Reagan expressed his concern that the kind of patriotism we grew up with was fading away. I call it "patriotism cooling." Reagan said that parents were questioning the necessity to teach their children about the greatness of America and the sacrifices which were made for the freedom and liberty we enjoy. Garçon not even thinking to wave the U.S. flag is testimony of the "patriotism cooling" Reagan saw coming.

Unlike "global warming," "patriotism cooling" is real and extremely dangerous. In our schools, national pride is considered biased, ignorant, and rude. How dare we think of America as exceptional?! Our kids are no longer taught the incredible sacrifice our boys at Normandy made for freedom. I recently read that educators are pushing a new curriculum which would eliminate much of America's early history. The more ignorant our kids are of the value, the struggle, the uniqueness, and the price of freedom, the more passive they are when freedoms are systematically taken away. And yet, our schools are teaching songs about Barack Hussein Obama, mmm...mmm...mmm.

Patriotism cooling did not happen overnight. Incrementally, à la death by a thousand cuts, America has been dissed by television, Hollywood, schools, Democrats, the left, and most outrageously, even the President of the United States. Democrat Congressman Jack Murtha accused our military of rape and murder. Democrat Senator Dick Durbin accused the America's treatment of GITMO detainees as being equal to the Nazis' death camps, the Soviet gulags, and the genocidal campaigns of Pol Pot. President Obama accused the U.S. of arrogance. He chastised us for consuming too much and settings our thermostats too high. Obama travels the world bowing to foreign leaders and apologizing for our country.

Unquestionably, the Left's constant bashing has instilled in some Americans a negative perception of their country. Actor Danny Glover even blamed, believe it or not, the earthquake in Haiti on the U.S. I received the following e-mail from a grandmother who agrees. She wrote, "...we are the ones who are killing the world with our own destructive ways. It just goes to show you we have to change the way we live." Hogwash!

Truth be told, America is the greatest, most generous, and most compassionate nation on the planet.

Private citizens gave an estimated $240.92 billion to aid the victims of hurricane Katrina.

The U.S. has donated billions to Haiti over the years. Thousands of missionary organizations have been attempting to help Haiti for years. Haiti earthquake relief contributions from the U.S. far exceed the contributions of all other countries combined.

A byproduct of the Tea Party movement is a resurgence of patriotism. While I am encouraged and grateful, we still have a long way to go. Our children must be taught American exceptionalism. They must be educated about the cost of freedom, which is extremely precious, fragile, and unique to most of the world.

Americans must stop allowing themselves to be intimidated by the left. Under threat of taking it out on their kids via a lower grade, parents were forced to watch the Al Gore propaganda global warming movie. Gore's film is another "cut" to our country. It contributes to the left's orchestrated, anti-patriotic, "we're the world's bad guys" agenda.

My friends, Lady Liberty deserves much better. Please, stand up for America. Teach your children. I've penned a Haiti relief song titled "Haiti Relief is Who We Are." Sadly, it is unique because it praises America rather than bashes her. My song celebrates the generosity and greatness of America. It is unfortunate that for these reasons, the song will be considered controversial. Nevertheless, I join with Ronald Reagan in seeing America as it truly is: "a shining city on a hill." I pray you will do the same.

-Lloyd Marcus, (black) Unhyphenated American, singer/songwriter, entertainer, author, artist, and Tea Party patriot

Mark Levin On Global Warming

Listen to Mark Levin launch into these Global Warming Nazis!
They blame not enough snow on Global Warming and too much snow on Global Warming.
Enough already, you wacko environmentalists!

Bipartisanship Equals Single-Payer-ship

Below is an article by David Limbaugh. He always hits the nail on the head. Obama hid like a little girl in the corner, all the while calling Republican the "Part of No". As David's brother Rush says, "it's the party of Hell No"!
Soetero is full of tricks he learned from studying Marx and Saul Alinsky. Look how far America has sunk with political correctness pushing a Racist, Marxist CIC on us.

Bipartisanship Equals Single-Payer-ship
By David Limbaugh
It's not a good idea for Republicans to accept President Barack Obama's invitation to a "bipartisan" health care summit, because it would not advance acceptable health care reform. The only thing it likely would advance would be Obama's propaganda message -- and, thus, his socialist agenda.

Everyone knows Obama wouldn't be considering such a move if the American people had not so resoundingly rejected Obamacare.

From the very beginning, he has approached this issue more as a dictator than one interested in hearing genuine input from the other side. Nor has he shown good faith, having broken his cynical promise to televise the debates on C-SPAN and having misrepresented his plan in a number of particulars.

When called on the C-SPAN pledge, he glibly replied that most of the process has been televised in regular sessions of Congress and committee hearings, knowing full well that's not what anyone understood him to mean when he made his promise.

He has been as highhanded and dishonest in dealing with this issue as he has been with any other, which is quite a mouthful. He has ridiculed Republicans for their alleged obstruction and for not offering ideas of their own, when it was Republicans who first called for bipartisan talks last May and who did offer alternative plans, which Obama summarily rejected.

He looked us straight in the eye and told us, disingenuously, that in his plan, there would be no federal funding for abortion, no rationing, no interference in the doctor-patient relationship, no forcing people out of their private plans, no bill that was not budget-neutral, no single-payer plan and no decrease in patient choice with his public option.

As he waltzed unannounced into a news conference after failing to make himself available for one for some seven months, he proceeded, as usual, to decry "the political posturing that often paralyzes this town." I wonder whether he considers himself a participant in such posturing. After all, no modern president has ever engaged in the kind of incessant sniping at his predecessor or his opponents that Obama has. None has failed to take responsibility for his own actions the way Obama has. None has debased a State of the Union address to "call out" his political opponents.

If he wouldn't even square with us in his short statement on the proposed "bipartisan" health care summit, why should we expect him to in the meeting itself?

When he announced that he is "going to continue to seek the best ideas from either party," what were other members of his administration saying?

One White House official told The Washington Post, "This is not starting over. Don't make any mistake about that." And Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that Obama will "absolutely not" reset the legislative process. "I think he sees this as a step to actually accelerating the process forward," she said. "He wants a bill at his desk, and he sees this as kind of closing the loop and let's go."

He views this, just as he did his appearance at the Republican retreat, as an opportunity to use Republicans as a prop, to depict them as partisan obstructers of his magnanimous plan to save our health care system.

Obama says the American people are demanding bipartisanship and "a seriousness of purpose that transcends petty politics."

I don't think so. And I don't think his primary concern is what the American people want. If he were truly listening to the people, he would hear their rejection of Obamacare and the rest of his socialist agenda. He would heed the freshly released Rasmussen poll showing that 61 percent of Americans want him to drop health care reform. Yes, the American people have spoken, but what they're demanding is not bipartisanship. Rather, they want him to cease and desist from his socialist schemes.

Indeed, bipartisan compromise in this case would likely be very detrimental to America's best interests. What Obama means by bipartisanship is that he be allowed to proceed with his plan to expand government control over health care with the fewest possible cosmetic changes necessary to con Republicans into signing on -- a ploy right out of the Saul Alinsky street agitation playbook.

Any bipartisan action on this bill would necessarily result in further government control over health care and move us ever closer to a single-payer system. Yet the only way to improve our health care system is to roll back, not increase government's role. It follows, then, that no reform at all would be vastly superior to so-called bipartisan reform.

Seriously, does anyone believe that Obama will agree to any plan that includes market reforms? Of course not. Republicans -- on behalf of the American people -- should just say "no!"
Written by David Limbaugh

Federal Overreach and the New States' Rights Movement

Another great, insightful article is below by Jon. N. Hall. He talks about the Progressives.
Progressives and Liberals are a mean bunch. They will do whatever, lie, cheat or steal to take away American Citizen's rights.
My saying is to have these Progressives go live in Iran or Commie China or Cuba. Then let's hear them run their big mouths about change and hope.
Punish them at the Polls in 2010!

By Jon N. Hall
Ever since the election of Woodrow Wilson, America has been concentrating more and more power and control in the federal government. With the 2008 elections, the century-long creep towards statism accelerated. America is not only on the wrong track -- she's on an express train to Big Government hell.

One bright spot is that the states are standing up to federal overreach. We see this in the preemptive gun law recently enacted in Montana. Kahrin Deines writes:

Still, much bigger prey lies in Montana's sights: a legal showdown over how far the federal government's regulatory authority extends.

"It's a gun bill, but it's another way of demonstrating the sovereignty of the state of Montana," said Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who signed the bill.

Progressives are troubled that this is nullification, which "holds that state legislators have the capacity to invalidate federal laws to which they are opposed." Nullification goes back to our founding, and latter-day nullifiers cite the 10th Amendment. Providing historical context (and some good links), Chris Weigant contends that

... calling the Tenth Amendment movement a bunch of nutjobs may be premature. They consider themselves in the company of Jefferson and Madison, after all. And they have a few recent Supreme Court decisions to give them hope.

Josh Eboch, a proud "tenther" with the Tenth Amendment Center, writes:

Yet, from the Fugitive Slave Act to REAL ID, American history is replete with examples of states successfully asserting their sovereignty in constitutional disputes with the federal government. And there is every reason to believe that they could do so again with regard to health care, should it prove necessary.

And the states are resisting Obamacare as, in general, a 10th Amendment violation. Some states also object to the specifics of Obamacare, such as the individual mandate, which Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot addressed in this open letter. Columnist George Will weighs in on judicial review of the individual mandate:

The latter kind of conservatives are more truly conservative than the former kind because they have stronger principles for resisting the conscription of individuals, at a cost of diminished liberty, into government's collective projects. So a constitutional challenge to the mandate serves two purposes: It defies a pernicious idea and clarifies conservatism.

Many are appalled by the sleaze of the Nebraska Compromise, which secured Sen. Ben Nelson's key vote, and the Louisiana Purchase, which secured Sen. Mary Landrieu's. (Could this be vote-buying?) The feds have succeeded in pitting state against state. So state AGs are getting restive, and they may sue over unequal treatment.

In a feisty article, John Boldin writes:

Regarding nullification and health care, there's already a growing movement right now. Led by Arizona, voters in a number of states may get a chance to approve State Constitutional Amendments in 2010 that would effectively ban national health care in their states.

Indeed. On February 1, Virginia's Senate passed a bill to outlaw the individual mandate, which seems destined to be signed by their new GOP governor. "Lawmakers in 35 states have filed or proposed amendments to their state constitutions or statutes rejecting health insurance mandates," reports the Associated Press. The states seem to be spoiling for a showdown with the feds over the issue of state sovereignty.

The states' (and the Tea Party movement's) growing resistance to federal overreach may be akin to the Article V movement, which wants a constitutional convention. Larry Sabato lists this as the last item in his 23 proposals to revitalize the Constitution: "23. Convene a new Constitutional Convention using the state-based mechanism left to us by the Framers." The mere threat of an Article V convention might be enough to get Congress to be more responsive to the will of We the People. As Attorney John Armor recently explained at American Thinker, the 17th Amendment was ratified only when Congress was threatened with an Article V convention.

That the states are finally asserting their sovereignty is heartening. But to fully restore their sovereignty and the lost balance between state and federal governments, the states might urge repeal of the 17th Amendment (which this writer has urged) and return to the original arrangement where state legislatures elect U.S. senators.

If the states want to see what loss of sovereignty is all about, then they should look at what's happening to the member states of the European Union. These once-proud states were at one time sovereign nations, even empires. The progressives in Washington want the member states of America to be just like those in the E.U. -- shorn of sovereignty.

It's taken America a century to get in this ditch. Getting out won't be easy. But it is the solemn duty of the states to resist federal overreach.

What nullification and states' rights are all about is constitutionalism, rule of law, and federalism -- the bedrock of America's system.

(Those who need to relearn what America's system is all about might start by viewing these five videos from Judge Andrew Napolitano; they're terrific.)
Jon N. Hall is a programmer/analyst from Kansas City.

Viet Nam, Holder, Obama, and the Christmas Day Terrorist

Days have turned to months to over a year and Soetero is still flapping his gums reading a Teleprompter. Soetero hates the Military at least our Military. Did the degenerate Liberals think Soetero flipped a switch the day he was sworn in and started to love our Troops? Maybe those on an acid trip from the 70's believe it.
Barry and Ayers, Holder and Rev. Wrong Way Wright are disciples of Marxism. Their hatred for our Military runs deep. Why would Barry want a Civilian (Brown Shirts) national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong as our Military.
Punish these Marxist, Politically now!
Please read this terrific article by Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr. below.

By Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr.

On Christmas Day, Attorney General Eric Holder decided to prevent the obtaining of crucial enemy intelligence from airline terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab by granting him the "right" to remain silent. The implicit negative consequences of that decision pertaining to our future safety reminded me of a stark and positive contrast to Holder's dangerous way of dealing with captured enemy combatants.

In April of 1968, I was a young infantry captain operating near the coast of Quang Nam Province in South Viet Nam. We captured prisoners who meant us grievous harm. Go back there with me for a few minutes, see how we handled that kind of situation, and then we'll return to today and examine Eric Holder's actions with that context in mind.

An enemy sapper battalion, with a method of operation akin to those of today's terrorists, had caused us many casualties and much fear. Operating at night, using pipe bombs, teams of enemy sappers blew gaps in the roads we traveled and booby-trapped the ways around those gaps. Sometimes they booby-trapped the gap itself.

Too often, the sappers planted high explosives under the roadways and waited in concealment for a convoy to enter the kill zone before detonating their bombs. Traveling those roads became a terrifying experience.

Our colonel resolved to attack the enemy battalion's base camp and destroy these sappers. On the first day of our regimental operation, I radioed my superior that my unit had captured three enemies. Within fifteen minutes, a major choppered in to pick up the prisoners -- a very dangerous act for him and the pilot, as we were still in contact with the enemy.

We threw our bound prisoners into the chopper, and it flew off hugging the landscape to avoid enemy fire. The major did not take the prisoners to an ACLU lawyer in the hopes that within a month or so, their parents could be contacted, at which point said parents could hopefully persuade their captured children to talk.

Well-trained military intelligence officers conducted the interrogations, knowing which prisoner to focus on and how to question him. They forced the most vulnerable prisoner to reveal where the sapper battalion's main defenses were, and when the enemy intended to mass there.

Our colonel immediately prepared what is known as a T.O.T., or Time-On-Target. The shells of all our big guns within range (105s, 155s, 175s, and even naval batteries from what I believe was the battleship New Jersey) were plotted to hit the enemy position simultaneously. It was our turn to terrify the sappers.

The effect of this massive artillery barrage exceeded our expectations. We met no resistance when we swept through the area, finding more than thirty enemy killed by shrapnel from the airbursts. Better yet, we found that their command bunker had been penetrated by a shell with a delayed-action fuse, killing all ten of its high-ranking occupants. The terrorizing attacks on our region's roadways ceased.

That was a textbook tactical situation where the prompt interrogation of captured enemy combatants led to successful battlefield results, ultimately saving the lives of many American soldiers, perhaps mine included. We treated prisoners as intelligence assets to be promptly exploited, not as criminal suspects absurdly presumed to be innocent prior to some kind of moronic trial for show.

Let's go back now to the current strategic situation, where the safety of every American civilian is at stake, and where the Attorney General and the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, are responsible for preventing the immediate interrogation of an enemy combatant from taking place.

Terrorist Abdulmutallab's failed bombing attempt on the civilian U.S. airliner on Christmas day led to his immediate capture. Before even an hour had passed, Attorney General Eric Holder, acting under the authority of Barack Hussein Obama, provided an attorney for this enemy combatant, forbidding the gathering of enemy intelligence crucial to the safety of the American people from future terrorist acts.

Holder's decision to protect Abdulmutallab from interrogation has facilitated enemy efforts to continue surprise terror attacks against American citizens at home and abroad. Thus, Holder and Obama have given a measure of aid to our enemies.

Whatever cripples our efforts to close with and destroy our enemies empowers those enemies to kill and maim us. Knowing that their captured comrades will not be subject to standard military interrogations doubtless comes as a great relief to our sworn enemies. Al-Qaeda leaders know full well that the granting of constitutional rights to their fellow terrorists helps keep secret the time, nature, and place of their future attacks. Thus, Holder and Obama have given not only aid to our enemies, but a measure of comfort as well.

Holder and Obama cannot take back or justify what they have done. However hard they may try, their propagandists cannot tinsel over Holder's and Obama's dereliction of duty by cleverly embellishing their excuses. By protecting the terrorist from immediate interrogation, Holder and Obama delivered a sledgehammer blow to the framework of our national security. Who knows how much crucial information on planned enemy strikes has been lost as a result of their ineptitude and betrayal of the public trust?

Upon taking office, Holder solemnly swore that he would "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Yet instead of supporting and defending the Constitution against foreign enemy Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, Holder shielded the terrorist from interrogation, using our founding document as his pretext for doing so. There is no provision in the U.S. Constitution for granting constitutional rights to enemy combatants. By granting Abdulmutallab such rights, Holder has violated his oath of office.

In the event that anyone has missed the point, here is the crux of the matter: Instead of acting to protect us from enemy combatants, Eric Holder acted to protect an enemy combatant from revealing what he knew about planned terrorist operations directed against us. In doing so, Holder has demonstrated an unfathomable indifference to our national security and person safety.

If Obama and Holder had been a major and a captain in my outfit in Viet Nam, they would have compromised our mission, caused casualties to mount, and caused morale to plummet. Think of yourself as a soldier operating today against our enemies in Iraq or Afghanistan. Would you want Obama or Holder in your immediate chain of command? No, you would not.

The sad and tragic truth for us today is that these two incompetents are running the whole show.


By Mr. Johnson, a West Point graduate and an airborne ranger infantry veteran of Viet Nam, is the author of The Parthenon Code: Mankind's History in Marble and Noah in Ancient Greek Art. He is also the inventor of the board game "Obozo's America: Why Bother Working for a Living?"

Obama Lies To America

More Lies caught on tape. Barry was firmly cemented in that Racist Church with his Wife.
Punish these Marxist Politically!

The Real Scoop on Lady Qaeda, Aafia Siddiqi: & How We Blew It

Read another great article below by Debbie Schlussel. Debbie is brilliant and yet our highly paid fringe MSM are afraid to pull their heads out of the sand.
To make matters worse we have this hypocrite Michelle Obama. She and her boy, Barry get up and give some slanted, cryptic speech about Organized Religion.
They don't have the guts to call out the real Terrorists as this would hurt Barry and Holders's client list.
Hat tip to Mr. I

The Real Scoop on Lady Qaeda, Aafia Siddiqi: Her Circle of Boston Friends & How We Blew It

Portion below by Debbie Schlussel
You can read about yesterday’s conviction of Al-Qaeda female operative Aafia Siddiqui in plenty of mainstream news publications and sites. And you can read the regurgitation of the news on a number of bloggers’ and writers’ websites–you know, the ones who claim they are “experts” on “jihad,” when they haven’t a clue.

But here’s the real insight: Siddiqui’s conviction for shooting at U.S. soldiers after they caught her in Afghanistan (with chemicals, a dirty bomb recipe, plans to blow up U.S. gas stations and major New York sites) is really not the story here. The story is Aafia Siddiqui’s part in the early stages of Al-Qaeda around the world, as it was formed by a close circle of friends, who were mostly Muslim students in Boston here on visas in the late 1980s and early to mid-’90s. One of those students, one of those friends, was Aafia Siddiqui, who would later become Al-Qaeda’s designated master terrorist in the U.S., until she was caught in Afghanistan. It’s the story of how America dropped the ball on the inchoate Al-Qaeda world leadership concentrated amongst a few Muslim visa holders concentrated in a major American city. And it’s the story of how America let those people leave the country and did nothing to stop them, even the one they caught after 9/11 and willingly gave up to the Syrians.

That’s the real story behind Aafia Siddiqui that you didn’t hear, amidst the hubbub about her shrieks against Jewish jurors and judges, and the Israelis. But I’m telling the Cliff’s Notes, er . . . “Debbie’s Notes” version of that frightening story here.

It was the late 1980s. Bassam Ahmad Kanj a/k/a Abu A’isha, Nabil Al-Marabh, Raed Hijazi, and Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi fought together as part of Al-Qaeda forces in Afghanistan. At that time, Kanj, as I’ve written, also shared a house in Pakistan with:

* Rabih Haddad–founder of American Al-Qaeda front-group, Global Relief Foundation (he later lived in Ann Arbor, Michigan before being deported, and sources say Siddiqui had immediate relatives living there, too);
* Mohammed Al-Churbaji a/k/a “Abu Salim”–co-founder and #2 in American Al-Qaeda front-group, Global Relief Foundation (who now lives in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as he fights deportation–his son, Salim, was an Obama fundraiser, and he has several terrorist anchor babies with U.S. citizenship). He engaged in a sham marriage and was deported, but apparently paid off a U.S. official, “Sam Libby,” and got back into the U.S. where he married a second wife, Denise a/k/a “Um Salim”);
* Abu Rawdha–a leading mujahideen fighter killed fighting in Afghanistan in 1991 or ‘92; and
* Abu Amatallah–another Islamic terrorist.
Living nearby was Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Osama Bin Laden’s spiritual guru, with whom Bin Laden founded the forerunner to Al-Qaeda, MAK–Maktab Al-Khidamat), and others who were part of the nucleus of the original Qaeda.
All of these people prayed at the same Karachi mosque along with Bin Laden. Siddiqui and her family also lived in the area, and they reportedly assigned her to study germ weapons at MIT. Yup, we trained her and did their bidding.

Aafia Siddiqui Partner-in-Jihad Bassam Kanj a/k/a “Abu Aisha”

In the 1990s, Kanj went to Boston, where he was a student at Boston University along with other jihadis who were plotting Al-Qaeda’s worldwide future on our soil. He worked with Al-Marabh, Hijazi, and Elzahabi–his Qaeda comrades in Afghanistan–at a Boston cab company. Meanwhile, their friend and comrade, Aafia Siddiqui was going to grad school at MIT and then Brandeis University (ironically a school founded by and populated with her most hated ethnicity–the JOOOS; so much for the argument about how exposure to Jews and Americans makes Muslims like them). The FBI believed as do other intelligence sources that these Boston-based Qaeda acolytes regularly met and comprised the Boston Cell of Al-Qaeda, planning their future attacks.
Kanj went on to become a well known jihadi fighter and terrorist leader, first fighting for Bin Laden in Afghanistan, then in Chechnya, and, finally, starting Al-Qaeda’s Lebanese splinter group, “Usbat Al-Ansar” [The League of Supporters/Helpers]. He was killed in 2000 by the Lebanese government, as he pulled off a terrorist attack.

Kanj met his American wife, Marlene Earl Kanj Al-Mirabi, at Boston University. While there, he not only conspired with Al-Marabh and the others but he met and consorted with another Boston University Muslim, Mohammed Chehade, who also later worked for the American Al-Qaeda front group, Global Relief Foundation. Both Siddiqui and Kanj worked for CARE at the time.

Aafia Siddiqui’s Boston Al-Qaeda Buddy Nabil Al-Marabh

Al-Marabh, part of the Boston cell, was on the FBI’s five most wanted after the 9/11 attacks, because he was a known Bin Laden right-hand man. Al-Marabh was found driving a cab in Chicago. But he was never prosecuted. In a Detroit apartment where he once lived, members of the Detroit Terror Cell were found by FBI agents, along with videos of Disneyland, sites in Las Vegas, and detailed plans of the U.S. Air Force Base in Incirlik Turkey, including the take-off order of U.S. AWACS and Israeli F-16 planes. Al-Marabh was found with plans to blow up New York’s Lincoln Tunnel.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, at the behest of the Bush Administration, released Al-Marabh to Syria. He was seen thereafter (by a client of mine, a then-FBI informant) at Ein El-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon, organizing for Al-Qaeda in Lebanon as his Boston jihadi buddy, Bassam Kanj, had done at the same camp. He was recruiting Al-Qaeda terrorists to attack U.S. troops in Iraq through the Syrian border. Federal Judge Gerald Rosen forbade prosecutor Richard Convertino from even mentioning Al-Marabh’s name at the Detroit Terror Cell trial, even though the cell members were found at his Detroit digs.

We blew an opportunity to learn more about the Boston terror cell in which Ms. Siddiqui was a part, when we set Al-Marabh free for no reason, other than to appease the Syrians as we prepared to go to war with Iraq. We were rewarded with Syria allowing its borders to be used as a revolving door for Al-Qaeda terrorists recruited by the released Al-Marabh.

We also blew the opportunity, when FBI agents found Marlene Kanj and questioned her. They let her go, and she has never been located again by the feds.
We blew the opportunity, yet again, when airhead Federal Judge Nancy Edmonds (now the judge on the Umar Farouk Abulmutallab case), refused to see that Rabbih Haddad was an Al-Qaeda terrorist and authorities had no choice but to simply deport him.
And, now, will we blow an opportunity to learn more about the Boston cell, as we’ve convicted Aafia Siddiqui, treated her like a regular criminal, and refused to torture her into telling us something? It appears we already have.

The next time I complain about the number of Muslim student visas we issue, think about Aafia Siddiqui, Bassam Kanj, and the Boston terror cell. They were guests in our country, and they planned our future demise at least a decade ahead.
That’s the story you didn’t hear in the Siddiqui trial. And you may never hear about it again. Sadly.
By Debbie Schlussel

Napolitano Girlfriend’s Dysfunctional NY Prisons: Muslim Cleric Smuggled Box Cutters

The story below by Debbie Schlussel is loaded with information on these Radical Left Wingers.
This is further evidence that Barry Hussein Obama is dead set on destroying America. Soetero continues to allow disgusting Eric Holder and despicable Janet NO to receive a pay check, at our expense.
At this point in time, anyone who supports the Racist Barry Soetero is a disgrace to America!
Hat tip to Mr. I

By Debbie Schlussel
Ever since Janet Napolitano became Homeland Security Secretary, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents warned me about her girlfriend, Dora Schriro, whom she brought with her from Arizona (where Schriro headed the Arizona Department of Corrections). Schriro, a bizarre woman with a Ph.D., treated prisoners as “clients,” her name for them, gave them birthday parties and cakes, etc. And Napolitano made Schriro her special advisor on immigration enforcement, particularly detention and removal of illegal aliens. That’s why many of them are now living in hotel facilities and given perks many destitute legal American citizens would die for. Her New Age psychobabble endangered American national security and made immigration enforcement and detention a nearly impossible task.

Sensible Shoes:

J-No & Gal-Pal Dora the Explorer Further Ruined ICE, NYDOC, Jeopardize America

When people ask me why I call Napolitano, “The Lesbionic Woman,” that’s one of several reasons why. J-No hires many butch women with whom she’s had and appears to want to have a relationship–most of whom have zero relevant experience–and they are flushing our border security down the toilet. But while Schriro’s policies at ICE will jeopardize our nation for years–maybe, decades–to come. I will be writing more about Schriro (and what she did to ICE) in the near future. Dr. Schriro (as she insists on being called), quickly left Homeland Security for a job running the New York Department of Correction (her official title is “Commissioner”), thanks to Mayor Michael Bloomberg. And that’s where our story begins.

Under Dora Schriro, an extremist Muslim prison cleric (redundant phrase) snuck in box cutter blades. Oh, and he’s a convicted murderer with a record of sexual assault, who converted to Islam in prison. And–ho apropos!–his chosen new Islamic surname is Abdu-Shahid, which is Arabic for “Slave of the Martyr.” And the violent cycle of radical Islamic conversions in the prisons comes full circle and continues.

A city Department of Correction Muslim chaplain who served 14 years in prison for murder and robbery was arrested today for carrying three utility blades and a pair of scissors into a lower Manhattan jail, authorities said.
The chaplain, Zulqarnain Abdu-Shahid, had the utility blades and scissors in his duffel bag when he arrived at the Manhattan Detention Complex in the morning, according to the city Department of Investigation. . . .
Authorities did not say why Abdu-Shahid was visiting the jail, commonly known as the Tombs, or why he was carrying the scissors and the rectangular blades, which were 1-and-1/2 inches long by three-quarters of an inch wide.
Abdu-Shahid, 58, was arrested at the scene and charged with four counts of first-degree promoting prison contraband — a felony carrying a maximum 7-year prison term — and four counts of the same charge in the second degree, a misdemeanor.
The Staten Island resident, who is married with three children, was ordered held in lieu of $30,000 bail during a hearing in Manhattan Criminal Court last night, where he appeared in a long robe and navy blue skull cap.
His lawyer, James McQueeney said the blades were ‘injector razor blades from an injector razor,” and that when Abdu-Shahid told that to the correction officers who stopped him, “his explanation that he didn’t know there were there [in the duffel bag] was accepted.”
“He was allowed into the” Tombs after the blades were confiscated,” McQueeney said. “Only later were questions raised about this.”

Incredible. They bought his “I didn’t know they were in there” explanation?! Does that work for us non-Muslims, when we get caught taking guns through airport security? How ’bout for a Christian chaplain trying to sneak this into prison? Don’t bet on it.

“Additional steps up to and including dismissal will be pursued consistent with the findings of” DOI, said Schriro, whom sources added has ordered “a thorough review of his hiring.”

The first “hiring review” should be that of Dora Schriro. And then, they should review having Muslim chaplains altogether. Of course, neither of these things will happen because we simply aren’t serious about facing and defeating the threats to this country posed by Muslims and the conversion and radicalization of non-Muslims in prison. And “Dr.” Schriro is too concerned–far more concerned–about the “welfare” of her incarcerated “clients” than she is about New Yorkers.
Abdu-Shahid was hired as a Muslim imam chaplain by the DOC three years ago tomorrow, and has a salary of $49,471 annually.
State Corrections Department records show that he entered state prison in September 1979 to begin serving a sentence of 15-years-to-life for a second-degree murder and a first-degree robbery committed in Manhattan. He was paroled in August 1993, and finished his parole in August 2001.
According to news accounts at the time, the cleric, a Brooklyn resident then known as Paul Pitts, was convicted with three other defendants in 1979 after the longest criminal trial in New York State Supreme Court history – one year, three months and three days.
Pitts and his co-defendants had held up a Harlem supermarket on Dec. 9, 1976, and during the robbery shot and killed a 30-year-old customer named Philip Crawford.
The Post also has learned that his criminal record includes an arrest for sexual assault in Queens, but that case later was dismissed.
Abdu-Shahid’s lawyer, McQueeney, said, “He’s been out of prison since the early ’90s. He’s completely reformed.”

Uh-huh. Sure he is. That’s why he was carrying blades into a prison.

A city Correction source said of Abdu-Shahid’s arrest, “It’s a disgrace that taxpayers are funding Muslim chaplains who not only have criminal records, but also are promoting violence.”
Abdu-Shahid’s boss — head chaplain Umar Abdul-Jalil — himself was hired by the DOC despite having done a 14-year stint in prison for drug dealing.

Here’s the New York Department of Correction press release downplaying the incident.
Yup, this is Janet Napolitano’s girlfriend’s institution. And so is ICE. Good luck, America.
By Debbie Schlussel

Nazi Pelosi's Last Hurrah

Below is a great article by Jane Jamison.
She points out the atrocity of what we know as Nazi Peolosi.
C'mon California, wake up! I have lived there and know what you are dealing with. You don't have to be a limp-kneed Liberal loser to meet Beautiful women. These guys lose their backbone and become wimps just to get in with the elitist Liberal women. I found plenty of California women who are smart, funny and Beautiful, with Conservative values.
These left wing wackos should be "BOWING like Barry" when they hear Bush or Cheney's name. These guys helped prevent a 9/11 type disaster in LA. If we had that thief Gore or this COWARD Soetero as President we would probably had been hit with more TERRORIST attacks and would have been thrown into a depression for the Country.
Look at what you guys in California give us, Racist Boxer, Nazi Pelosi and that disgusting FrankenFeinstein.
Fix your State problems, find a Michele Bachmann.

Portion below by Jane Jamison
San Francisco's congresswoman of 23 years, the daughter of a Baltimore mayor, has a sense of self-entitlement and extravagance unimagined by most public servants and ordinary folk. Her indulgences charged to American taxpayers are now documented and damning.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has spent or authorized spending at least $3.2 million on trips, hotels, food, high-priced liquor, and military jet rides in the past two years.

Pelosi spent at least $1.1 million of taxpayer funds ushering a delegation of at least 106 people to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen (the "global warming" conference where nothing was decided). The entourage stayed two nights. According to CBS News,

For 15 Democratic and 6 Republican Congressmen, food and rooms for two nights cost $4,406 tax dollars each. That's $2,200 a day...

Total hotel, meeting rooms and "a couple" of $1,000-a-night hospitality suites topped $400,000.

Fifty-nine House and Senate staff flew commercial during the Copenhagen rush. They paid government rates -- $5-10,000 each -- totaling $408,064. Add three military jets -- $168,351 just for flight time -- and the bill tops $1.1 million dollars -- not including all the Obama administration officials who attended: well over 60.

Speaker Pelosi would not comment about the expenses to CBS News. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Malibu) was also on the trip, but he says he "did not know" what expenses were incurred.

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, has just released a report on Speaker Pelosi's extravagant use of government aircraft:

According to the documents, obtained by Judicial Watch through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Speaker's military travel cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a two-year period - $101,429.14 of which was for in-flight expenses, including food and alcohol.

Speaker Pelosi used Air Force aircraft to travel back to her district at an average cost of $28,210.51 per flight. The average cost of an international CODEL is $228,563.33. Of the 103 Pelosi-led congressional delegations (CODEL), 31 trips included members of the House Speaker's family.
One CODEL traveling from Washington, DC, through Tel Aviv, Israel to Baghdad, Iraq May 15-20, 2008, "to discuss matters of mutual concern with government leaders" included members of Congress and their spouses and cost $17,931 per hour in aircraft alone. Purchases for the CODEL included: Johnny Walker Red scotch, Grey Goose vodka, E&J brandy, Bailey's Irish Crème, Maker's Mark whiskey, Courvoisier cognac, Bacardi Light rum, Jim Beam whiskey, Beefeater gin, Dewars scotch, Bombay Sapphire gin, Jack Daniels whiskey, Corona beer and several bottles of wine.
According to a "Memo for Record" from a March 29-April 7, 2007, CODEL that involved a stop in Israel, "CODEL could only bring Kosher items into the Hotel. Kosher alcohol for mixing beverages in the Delegation room was purchased on the local economy i.e. Bourbon, Whiskey, Scotch, Vodka, Gin, Triple Sec, Tequila, etc."
The Department of Defense advanced a CODEL of 56 members of Congress and staff $60,000 to travel to Louisiana and Mississippi July 19-22, 2008, to "view flood relief advances from Hurricane Katrina." The three-day trip cost the U.S. Air Force $65,505.46, exceeding authorized funding by $5,505.46.
Speaker Pelosi has a history of wasting taxpayer funds with her boorish demands for military travel. And these documents suggest the Speaker's congressional delegations are more about partying than anything else," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is rated #8 of Washington's ten most corrupt politicians for 2009.

House Speaker Pelosi is one of the fifteen richest members of Congress, with a net worth between $33 million and $95 million. (So why does she charge us for her family's Grey Goose martinis on Air Force three? Nancy can afford to BYOB.)

There is a moral "disconnect" in the Pelosi family vineyard business. From Investors.com, 2006:

As Peter Schweizer notes in his best-selling expose of liberal hypocrisy, "Do As I Say (Not As I Do)," part of the fortune of this defender of the working man is a Napa Valley vineyard worth $25 million that she owns with her husband. The vineyard produces expensive grapes for high-end wines. Napa grapes bring up to $4,000 a ton compared with $300 a ton for, say, San Joaquin grapes.

But Pelosi, winner of the 2003 Cesar Chavez award from the United Farm Workers, hires only nonunion workers and sells these grapes to nonunion wineries. Schweizer places Pelosi in a chapter titled "Workers of the World Unite Somewhere Else." UFW members need not apply at the Pelosi family vineyards.

With the above facts in mind, Pelosi voted against the Fence Act of 2006 to build a fence along the American-Mexican border, against requiring ID cards for illegal aliens, against electronic data-keeping of illegal aliens, and for driver's licenses for illegal aliens.

CIA "You Lie": Speaker Pelosi was indignant at so-called "torture" of Iraq war detainees by waterboarding. When the CIA produced memos showing that she attended briefings and gave consent before the interrogation tactics were used, Pelosi publicly claimed that President Bush and the CIA lied.

The CIA's displeasure at Pelosi's self-interested slander has caused months of rumors that Steny Hoyer will replace Pelosi as Speaker of the House next year, if she is reelected and if the Democrats still have a majority. Her leadership is privately questioned by her own party.

Pelosi's Poll Pallor

Rasmussen Reports Poll:
Just 35% of voters nationwide share a favorable opinion of Pelosi, though that is the highest level measured since last May. Fifty-seven percent (57%) view Pelosi unfavorably, down from 63% in December.

Field Poll California, January 27, 2010:

Two-thirds of voters here (66%) disapprove of Congress' overall job performance, while only 24% approve.

By a three to one margin (69% to 23%) Californians disapprove of the way Congress has addressed the health care issue.

Voters also have a more negative than positive view of the job that California Democrat Nancy Pelosi is doing as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Currently, 46% disapprove of her performance while 39% approve.

Madame Speaker bullies on. It's not clear if she doesn't care or is just oblivious to the fact that 57% of American voters think that passing nothing would be better than passing the current health care bill. Pelosi told the San Francisco Chronicle that health care would be passed one way or the other:

We will go through the gate. If the gate is closed, we will go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we will pole vault in. If that doesn't work, we will parachute in. But we are going to get health care reform passed for the American people for their own personal health and economic security and for the important role that it will play in reducing the deficit.

From The Less-Significant-But-Still-Very-Weird Department: Code Purple.

Seated behind President Obama at his State of the Union address, House Speaker Pelosi and Vice President Joe Biden were "color-coordinated." Pelosi had a lavender jacket; Biden had a purple-striped tie. Mrs. Obama wore purple. With al-Qaeda terrorists trying to blow up airplanes over American cities with underwear bombs, 10% national unemployment, and a ballooning deficit, why in the world would the second and third in line behind the president have time to think about wearing "matching outfits"?

If Nancy Pelosi were a Republican, she would have been hounded from office on the basis of any of the above. The tail-wagging national media have rarely and barely nipped at any of these Achilles' heels, but that may change soon with the release of the Pelosi expense reports.


Nancy Pelosi's home state now has an unemployment rate of 12.5 %. It has just been announced the state budget, already $21 billion in the red, will likely be out of money by April. Aren't the bluebloods of San Francisco beginning to get at least a teeny twinge of embarrassment from their congresswoman's elitist ramblings and rants? How many sandwiches could be purchased for the homeless people on Market Street in downtown San Francisco with what Pelosi spends boozing on her cross-country flights?

Since the national health care plan is ostensibly to help those same poor, elderly, and "little people" that Democrats are supposedly serving, don't any of Pelosi's liberal friends find this luxurious lollapalooza at public expense unseemly and elitist? Nancy Pelosi's effectiveness and credibility are irreparably harmed due to her own deeds and words. She can't blame Bush. There surely is a liberal "lieutenant" or two in San Francisco to take over the "reign" and run for Pelosi's seat. We can't afford Nancy anymore.

Whenever she retires from the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi will be entitled to her congressional salary and gold-plated health benefits for life, despite the fact she is a multi-millionaire and can certainly afford to fund herself and a small town.

Even so, Nancy Pelosi will be far less expensive for U.S. taxpayers as a retired congresswoman than she is when she is on duty.
Jane Jamison is publisher of the conservative news/commentary blog, UNCOVERAGE.net.